DOCSLIB.ORG

A Tale of Five Protocols

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Tale of Five Protocols A tale of five Ebook protocols The ultimate guide to the IoT wireless communication Revision 3.0 landscape February 2018 2018 EDITION Ebook by Silvair Table of Contents In pursuit of interoperability 3 Can we talk? 5 Why not Wi-Fi? 8 Riding the Z-Wave 13 ZigBee – is the sting still sharp? 19 THREADing the way through a connected home 24 Bluetooth: a technology in transition 30 And the winner is... 40 Copyright © 2018. All rights reserved. page 2 Ebook by Silvair Introduction: 1 In pursuit of interoperability Companies venturing into the IoT market are facing some difficult choices. One of the crucial de- cisions they need to make relates to the wireless communication technology their future smart products will employ. At the most basic level, the IoT is all about connectivity. The idea is that countless numbers of smart devices are able to communicate seamlessly, producing massive benefits across all aspects of our lives and having a remarkable impact on our society. The reality, however, is still far from that concept. At this early stage of market development, the Internet of Things is heavily fragmented and lacks interoperability. A recent report from McKinsey Global Institute predicts that the global economic impact of the IoT could reach even up to $11.1 trillion per year by 2025, representing 11% of the entire world economy. But at the same time, it identifies several major obstacles on the road to this IoT promised land. Topping the list is the problem of varying standards which prevent devices and systems from communicating with each other. According to the report, interoperability is required to capture roughly 40% – and in some cases, as much as 60% – of the potential value across IoT applications. The matter of interoperability does not revolve solely around connectivity protocols. Barriers also include lack of standard data formats or common software interfaces. Yet, getting smart devices to talk to one another and interoperate is an elementary need that must be met to make the connected world a reality. page 3 Ebook by Silvair A number of wireless communication technologies have attempted to dominate the smart home and connected building automation market, but so far none has emerged as a clear leader in this race. Each brings certain attributes to the table, and each approaches the challenge of interoperability in its own way. In fact, the differences between them are often so fundamental that drawing a direct comparison is virtually impossible. And while it’s still uncertain whether all the specific needs of various industries and environments can be addressed by a single universal connectivity solution, only the fittest will survive, eventually becoming the global standards for the IoT. This will benefit vendors and end users alike, contributing to further market growth and accelerating mass adoption of connected products. This situation mirrors the challenges faced by the technology industry in the early days of network- ing. A number of competing protocols proliferated back then, including IBM’s SNA, Xerox’ XNS, Novell’s IPX/SPX, Apple’s AppleTalk and many others, but it was TCP/IP that emerged as the protocol of choice for most networking applications, eventually becoming basically synonymous with the technical definition of the Internet. Without agreed-upon protocols and standards, the Internet and the World Wide Web would not have become what they are today. With the Internet of Things, history is repeating itself, although on an incomparably larger scale. Eventually, the “things” of the IoT will also learn to communicate with each other, but until that hap- pens, device makers are forced to make bets in an immature environment. This creates both certain complications and risks, as well as big opportunities. Some of the communication technologies will inevitably fade away over time, forcing all the companies utilizing them to retool and switch to other solutions, in the meantime withdrawing their products from the market. But those who bet on the winning horse will enjoy all the benefits of being ahead of the curve. So which of the available communication protocols is most reliable? Which offers the most for man- ufacturers of smart products, and has the greatest potential to survive the standards war, eventually becoming the go-to technology to connect the IoT? These are some of the questions we will try to answer here. We feel that we’ve learned several important lessons that we can share on this matter, since we also had to face the same exact dilemma, being fully aware of how significant the conse- quences of our decision would be. Wireless connectivity is behind everything we do, so we have put an enormous effort to ensure that we know each of the available solutions inside out, and that we are able to identify all of their strengths and weaknesses in particular applications. Our goal is not to promote one or another communication technology. Our goal is to make every- thing connectable, and interoperability is the only way to get there. So our guide to wireless com- munication protocols is, in fact, a guide to interoperability. Hopefully, these resources will prove valuable to manufacturers who are aching to get into the exciting market of connected devices, but still hesitate, being unsure of which technology to embrace. page 4 Ebook by Silvair Can we 2 talk? First things first. What are communication protocols and why do we need them to make our homes and offices smart? Simply put, a protocol is a set of predefined rules that are followed by two or more devices in a network to establish reliable communication and successfully exchange data between each other. For the Internet of Things to become a reality, an enormous part of this com- munication has to be wireless, and so a wide range of machine-to-machine wireless connectivity technologies have emerged over the past years. Features most of them have in common include low energy and low bandwidth requirements, as this radically extends battery life and allows mul- tiple devices to be used within a limited space. With radio being a shared medium, frequency bands are very scarce resources. In order to accommodate many devices in a given frequency band, the requirement for them to be low bandwidth is extremely important. Since many popular radio protocols have numerous overlapping qualities, at first glance it might seem that all of them basically do the same job. But as we already mentioned, there are fundamental differences between them. Some wireless communication technologies do completely different things than the other ones, and were developed with different goals and assumptions in mind. This becomes clear once we look at how they relate to the OSI reference model. page 5 Ebook by Silvair The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) developed the Open Systems Interconnec- tion (OSI) model back in the 80s to provide a framework for the coordination of communications standards development. To this day, it remains the primary reference model for network commu- nication. The OSI framework breaks the network communication process down into a manageable hierarchy of seven layers. Each of them has a specific function and deals with clearly defined tasks, interfacing with the layers located directly below and above it. The 7-layer OSI reference stack looks as follows: Application Presentation Session Transport Network Data Link Physical The name of each layer tells a bit about the types of services provided there. We won’t describe all these services and tasks at this point; the OSI model has been around for ages and there is plenty of detailed information about it all over the Internet. However, we will keep returning to the above stack in this document, explaining where on the OSI model a particular connectivity solution op- erates, and what consequences this entails both for end users and manufacturers. That’s because the OSI model is where the fundamental differences between individual protocols originate from. Some of the standards aspiring to connect the IoT define only a small part of the 7-layer OSI refer- ence model, while relying on other available technologies to take care of the remaining aspects of communication. Others go all the way from the physical layer up to the application layer. By itself, this does not make any of them better or worse. What it means is that they are often based on com- pletely different principles, and this is something one should be aware of when trying to answer the question “which technology will be the best one for my application?”. Another important thing is that there is no perfect technology. Different applications have different requirements, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Back to the OSI, in order to better visualize this 7-layer concept and how the protocols fit into this model, you can think of it as a framework for communication between humans. This might not be something we pay any attention to, but two persons who want to communicate with each other must share certain clearly specified rules. Just like protocols. Similarly as in the OSI reference model, these rules can be easily broken down into a number of layers. Starting from the lowest one, i.e. the physical layer, humans also need what can be called a physical infrastructure for their communica- tion. In the case of verbal communication, this would include such mediums as voice or sound in general. Human speech organs would also fit somewhere in the lower part of the OSI layer, and as we move towards the top, our communication rules would become more narrow, specifying phones, phonemes, words with their various meanings, grammatical structures, and so on.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vision of the Smart Home, the Services Concepts That Will Emerge and the Capabilities Needed to Support These Services on a Commercially Viable Basis
    Vision of Smart Home The Role of Mobile in the Home of the Future Contents Foreword Foreword Over the past decade, consumers the These services address consumers desire to manage their home 1 Executive Summary 1 world over have rapidly embraced mobile environment while becoming greener through lower energy telecommunications; connectivity has consumption and greater awareness of their CO2 footprint. The smart 2 Introduction 3 home concept, while it is still in its infancy, is set to become one of the allowed them to stay more and more in 3 Smart Home Vision 5 most significant consumer lifestyle developments of this decade. touch with their friends and colleagues. Smart Home Services 6 The smart home market is forecast to exceed $44bn in five years’ Stages in the Evolution of Smart Home Services 9 Now, the addition of connectivity to home time, bringing with it new opportunities for mobile network 4 Smart Home Landscape 13 appliances and the arrival of new online operators and the rest of the mobile ecosystem. The ubiquity of Supplier Ecosystem 13 energy management tools are creating mobile networks makes them indispensable for connecting smart home devices and Technology and Interoperability Landscape 17 the right environment for a new market in home energy management gateways, just as mobile phones are emerging as the main interface for home energy management applications. Smart Home - Growth Prospects in Vertical Segments 20 smart home services. 5 Smart Home Services and Requirements 25 We recognise, however, that the conversion of a home to a “smart” ecosystem is not going to happen without collaboration and cross-industry effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded (Thus Far, by More Than 262 Million People) Software Such As Skype
    Consortium Standards Bulletin A ConsortiumInfo.org publication February 2006 Vol V, No. 2 FEATURE ARTICLE CASE STUDY: THE UNRULY EMERGENCE OF THE DIGITAL HOME Andrew Updegrove Abstract: Although basic electrical devices like thermostats, phones and radios entered our dwellings many decades ago, the long-awaited vision of the "digital home" is only now becoming a reality. The emergence of the futuristic home, controlled by and for the fulfillment of the comfort, safety and enjoyment of its owners, has become possible only with the development of the hundreds of telecommunications, wireless, data format, networking and other standards that have been created by scores of accredited standards development organizations and unaccredited consortia, some venerable, and others new and created specifically for this purpose. An examination of how this new standards development ecosystem has evolved demonstrates how complex standards infrastructures come into existence through the reordering of relationships among existing, and the formation of new, standard setting organizations. Such a review also illustrates how participants behave when commercial opportunities are great, and the stakes for success (or failure) are high. Introduction: Through the coincidental maturation of a variety of technologies, the New Year has brought a rash of news stories and product announcements relating to innovations in digital home technology. All at once, multi-year research, standards development and commercialization efforts in video delivery and storage technology, wireless services (both "last mile" and in-home), multiple types of display technology, and new PC capabilities are converging at roughly the same time, allowing long- anticipated innovations in home services and systems to become available to consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • VIVINT SMART HOME, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2020 Registration No. 333-236340 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FORM S-3 ON FORM S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 VIVINT SMART HOME, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 98-1380306 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 4931 North 300 West Provo, Utah 84604 (404) 504-7474 (Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices) Shawn J. Lindquist Chief Legal Officer 4931 North 300 West Provo, Utah 84604 (404) 504-7474 (Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service) Copies to: Igor Fert Mark Brod Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 (212) 455-2000 Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after the effective date of this registration statement. If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box. ☒ If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ☐ If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecting Smart Home Environments for Healthcare: a Database-Centric Approach
    Architecting Smart Home Environments for Healthcare: A Database-Centric Approach Wagner Ourique de Morais DOCTORAL THESIS | Halmstad University Dissertations No. 15 Architecting Smart Home Environments for Healthcare: A Database-Centric Approach © Wagner Ourique de Morais Halmstad University Dissertations No. 15 ISBN 978-91-87045-33-2 (printed) ISBN 978-91-87045-32-5 (pdf) Publisher: Halmstad University Press, 2015 | www.hh.se/hup Printer: Media-Tryck, Lund Abstract The development of system architectures and applications for smart homes and ambient assisted living has been the main activity of a number of academic and industrial research projects around the world. Existing system architec- tures for smart environments usually employ different architectural styles in a multi-layer logical architecture to support the integration and interoperation of heterogeneous hardware and software technologies, which are subsequently used to provide two major functionalities: monitoring and assistance. It is also usual among existing architectures that the database management system is the most common but the least exploited architectural component, existing in the periphery of the system and devoted exclusively for data storage and re- trieval. However, database technology has advanced and matured considerably over the years, and, as a result, current database management systems can be and do more. This thesis considers the hypothesis of several features of modern database management systems being employed to address functional (e.g. well-being and security monitoring, automated control, data processing) and non-functional (e.g. interoperability, extensibility, data security and privacy) requirements of smart environments, i.e. the database management system serves as a platform for smart environments.
    [Show full text]
  • EM Analysis in the Iot Context: Lessons Learned from an Attack on Thread∗
    EM Analysis in the IoT Context: Lessons Learned from an Attack on Thread∗ Daniel Dinu1 and Ilya Kizhvatov2 1 SnT, University of Luxembourg, dumitru-daniel.dinu@uni.lu 2 Digital Security Group, Radboud University Nijmegen, i.kizhvatov@science.ru.nl Abstract. The distinguishing feature of the Internet of Things is that many devices get interconnected. The threat of side-channel attacks in this setting is less understood than the threat of traditional network and software exploitation attacks that are perceived to be more powerful. This work is a case study of Thread, an emerging network and transport level stack designed to facilitate secure communication between heterogeneous IoT devices. We perform the first side-channel vulnerability analysis of the Thread networking stack. We leverage various network mechanisms to trigger manipulations of the security material or to get access to the network credentials. We choose the most feasible attack vector to build a complete attack that combines network specific mechanisms and Differential Electromagnetic Analysis. When successfully applied on a Thread network, the attack gives full network access to the adversary. We evaluate the feasibility of our attack in a TI CC2538 setup running OpenThread, a certified open-source implementation of the stack. The full attack does not succeed in our setting. The root cause for this failure is not any particular security feature of the protocol or the implementation, but a side-effect of a feature not related to security. We summarize the problems that we find in the protocol with respect to side-channel analysis, and suggest a range of countermeasures to prevent our attack and the other attack vectors we identified during the vulnerability analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Assistants for Smart Homes
    Smart assistants for smart homes KATHARINA RASCH Doctoral Thesis in Electronic and Computer Systems Stockholm, Sweden 2013 TRITA-ICT/ECS AVH 13:16 KTH School of Information and 1653-6363 Communication Technology KTH/ICT/ECS/AVH-13/16-SE SE 164-40 Kista 978-91-7501-837-9 SWEDEN Akademisk avhandling som med tillstånd av Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan framlägges till offentlig granskning för avläggande av teknologie doktorsexamen i elektronik och datorsystem den 11 Oktober 2013 klockan 13 i Sal E, Forum Isafjordsgatan 39, Kista, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan. © Katharina Rasch, September 2013 Tryck: Universitetsservice US AB iii Abstract The smarter homes of tomorrow promise to increase comfort, aid elderly and disabled people, and help inhabitants save energy. Unfortunately, smart homes today are far from this vision – people who already live in such a home struggle with complicated user interfaces, inflexible home configurations, and difficult installation procedures. Under these circumstances, smart homes are not ready for mass adoption. This dissertation addresses these issues by proposing two smart assistants for smart homes. The first assistant is a recommender system that suggests useful services (i.e actions that the home can perform for the user). The recommended services are fitted to the user’s current situation, habits, and preferences. With these recommendations it is possible to build much simpler user interfaces that highlight the most interesting choices currently available. Configuration becomes much more flexible: since the recommender system automatically learns user habits, user routines no longer have to be manually described. Evaluations with two smart home datasets show that the correct service is included in the top five recommendations in 90% of all cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishing a Need for a Protocol for the Interoperability of Heterogeneous Iot Home Devices
    Georgia Southern University Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of Spring 2018 Establishing a Need for a Protocol for the Interoperability of Heterogeneous IoT Home Devices Jenna Bayto Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd Part of the Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Bayto, Jenna, "Establishing a Need for a Protocol for the Interoperability of Heterogeneous IoT Home Devices" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1742. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/1742 This thesis (open access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies, Jack N. Averitt College of at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@georgiasouthern.edu. ESTABLISHING A NEED FOR A PROTOCOL FOR THE INTEROPERABILITY OF HETEROGENEOUS IOT HOME DEVICES by JENNA BAYTO (Under the Direction of Christopher Kadlec) ABSTRACT The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to the field of connecting devices consumers use every day to the internet. As the world relies on more and more internet-driven technological devices to control functions within the home, issues with compatibility of those devices are surfacing. This research was created to establish the need for standardization of IoT devices within the home. INDEX WORDS: Internet of
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Houses
    Smart Houses: From Managing the House at a Distance to the Management of Life Itself Name: Liliana Bounegru Student number: 5904552 Email: l.bounegru@student.uva.nl Supervisor: Richard Rogers Second reader: Edward Shanken Institution: University of Amsterdam Department: Media Studies New Media (MA) Date: 23 rd of August 2009 1 Abstract The smart house has been around for more than a century as a technological vision of future domestic spaces, always falling short of materialization. However, smart homes underwent a revival in the late 1990s until the present. This thesis takes as its object of study the “arrangements of power” which underlie the contemporary smart homes in pre-production in academic research laboratories in the United States, as well as the mode of domesticity and subjectivity which they engender, with a particular focus on smart homes for the elderly. By applying on three case studies of smart house prototypes notions which appear in the work of late Foucault, and from which a recent subfield of cultural studies, namely governmentality studies emerges, I discuss the role of smart houses as potential technologies of government in the neoliberal political rationality of governing at a distance. The contemporary smart homes shift focus from automating physical activities of the inhabitants to disciplining their minds by becoming advisory or persuasive agents in order to make individuals self-governing and self- sufficient from the domestic space. In smart houses for the elderly, the posthuman mode of domesticity engendered by managing everyday domestic life with intelligent agents, takes the management of life itself as its focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Home As a Smart Real Estate a State of the Art Review
    Smart Home as a smart real estate A state of the art review Erfaneh Allameh, Mohammadali Heidari Jozam, Bauke de Vries, Harry Timmermans and Jakob Beetz Architecture, Building and Planning Department, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O.Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands {e.allameh, m.heidari.jozam, b.d.vries, h.j.p.timmermans, J.Beetz } @tue.nl Abstract. In this paper, we review an emerging type of dwelling, indicated as Smart Home, with a focus on future user lifestyles, needs and preferences. Researchers envision a future information society stemming from the convergence of ubiquitous computing, ubiquitous communication and intelligent environments, especially residential environment. Smart Homes have noble aims; they are said to be able to support different ranges of activities such as tele-working, tele-shopping, tele- communicating, tele-educating, tele-caring, etc. in the home environment. Moving from the industrial society to the information society will transfer homes from only being a sleeping accommodation towards being the most important hub of human life. A change that will dramatically affect the design of social places, work places, residential places, cities and future real estate business and maintenance models. In this paper, we investigate the major challenges of Smart Homes as a new dwelling concept. Surveys have shown that user acceptance of any changes in personal spaces is linked to user needs and preferences. In turn, user preferences are directly related to user lifestyles. Therefore, inspired by research in the field of user centered design and future lifestyles, we redefine the concept of housing to increase the acceptance and marketing of Smart Homes as future housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Struggle Customers, Companies, and the Internet of Things by BRENNA SNIDERMAN and MICHAEL E
    ISSUE 17 | 2015 Complimentary article reprint Power struggle Customers, companies, and the Internet of Things BY BRENNA SNIDERMAN AND MICHAEL E. RAYNOR > ILLUSTRATION BY ALEX NABAUM About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see www. deloitte.com/about for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms. Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. With a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries and territories, Deloitte brings world-class capabilities and high-quality service to clients, delivering the insights they need to address their most complex business challenges. Deloitte’s more than 200,000 professionals are committed to becoming the standard of excellence. This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms, or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte Network”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. No entity in the Deloitte network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication. © 2015. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. 84 Deloitte Review | DELOITTEREVIEW.COM POWER STRUGGLE 85 Power struggle Customers, companies, and the Internet of Things BY BRENNA SNIDERMAN AND MICHAEL E. RAYNOR > ILLUSTRATION BY ALEX NABAUM s the Internet of Things (IoT) permeates people’s daily lives, potentially useful information can now be created every time someone adjusts a thermostat or turns an ignition key or pedals a home-gym exercise bike.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilitee Market Analysis Report – First Version”
    Ref. Ares(2018)5602201 - 31/10/2018 Utility Business Model Transformation through human-centric behavioural interventions and ICT tools for Energy Efficiency D6.3 UtilitEE Market Report – First Version Version number: 0.7 Dissemination Level: PU Lead Partner: SOLINTEL Due date: 31/10/2018 Type of deliverable: R STATUS: Final Copyright © 2018 UtilitEE Project This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 768600 D6.3 UtilitEE Market Report – First Version Published in the framework of: UtilitEE - Utility Business Model Transformation through human-centric behavioural interventions and ICT tools for Energy Efficiency UtilitEE website: www.utilitee.eu Authors: Hugo Grasset – Solintel Dimitris Panopoulos – Suite 5 Evangelos Zacharis – Hypertech Eva Muñoz – ETRA I+D Revision and history chart: VERSION DATE EDITORS COMMENT Creation of ToC for consolidation of market 0.1 31/08/2018 Solintel analysis and research Assessment of ToC and contribution on utility 0.2 20/09/2018 Solintel level solutions. 0.3 10/10/2018 Solintel First draft of D6.3 0.3 12/10/2018 Suite 5 Comments and feedback to be addressed 0.4 26/10/2018 Solintel Final version for review 0.5 30/10/2018 Suite 5 Final comments and additions 0.6 31/10/2018 ETRA Review process 0.7 31/10/2018 Hypertech E.C. Submission Disclaimer: This document reflects only the author’s views and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained there 2 D6.3 UtilitEE Market Report – First Version Table of content 1 Executive summary ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forwarding Strategies for 6Lowpan-Fragmented Ipv6 Datagrams
    Forwarding Strategies for 6LoWPAN-Fragmented IPv6 Datagrams Vom Promotionsausschuss der Technischen Universit¨atHamburg-Harburg zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor-Ingenieur (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigte Dissertation von Andreas Weigel aus Potsdam, Deutschland 2017 Date of Oral Examination September 05th, 2017 Chair of Examination Board Prof. Dr. Heiko Falk Institute of Embedded Systems Hamburg University of Technology First Examiner Prof. Dr. Volker Turau Institute of Telematics Hamburg University of Technology Second Examiner Prof. Dr. Andreas Timm-Giel Institute of Communication Networks Hamburg University of Technology Acknowledgment Several people supported me in the long, difficult and sometimes frustrating process of finishing this dissertation. I want to seize the opportunity to express my deeply felt gratitude towards them. First, I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Turau for his guidance, encourage- ment and intellectual input, but also for being the kind of superior he is. I would like to thank my colleagues, who made everydays work at the institute a pleasant experience. Special thanks go to my \roommates" Bernd-Christian Renner, Martin Ringwelski and Florian Kauer for bearing with me and my curses and com- plains and for providing so much valuable input. Further, I'd like to thank Stefan Untersch¨utzand Martin Ringwelski for their implementation work on CometOS and its 6LoWPAN module and the numerous fruitful discussions. I want to thank my parents for their genes and the continuous support I experienced throughout my life. And finally: Thanks Susanne, for your encouragement and help and for taking on life together with me. Andreas Weigel L¨uneburg,November 2017 Abstract Recent efforts towards a fully standardized protocol stack (RPL, CoAP, 6LoWPAN) for \low power and lossy networks" (LLNs) contribute to realize the vision of the Internet of Things.
    [Show full text]