DOCSLIB.ORG

A Frame-Based Theory of Information Behavior: a Grounded Theory Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Frame-Based Theory of Information Behavior: a Grounded Theory Study A Frame-Based Theory of Information Behavior: A Grounded Theory Study Charles M. Naumer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2012 Reading Committee: Karen Fisher, Chair Michael Crandall David Hendry Hans J. Scholl Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Information School © Copyright 2012 Charles Naumer University of Washington Abstract A Frame-Based Theory of Information Behavior: A Grounded Theory Study Charles M. Naumer Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Karen E. Fisher, Professor Information School Information needs is a difficult phenomenon to understand as well as to define (Case, 2012). Understanding the way people identify their information needs is considered very difficult to assess given that they exist in someone’s head (Belkin & Vickery, 1985). Indeed, Wilson (1981) suggests “it may be advisable to remove the term ‘information needs’ from our professional vocabulary and to speak instead of information seeking towards the satisfaction of needs” (p. 9). Leading in this direction, Taylor’s (1968) foundational theory of information need has been criticized for its receipt of little empirical validation (Nicolaisen, 2009). Therefore, the question is how does one study information need and where does it fit within the field’s theoretical understanding of information behavior. This question leads to a primary research objective directed at exploring the relationship between the way people frame a problem and the way they define their information needs. The concept of framing - used in many cognate fields - has not been widely applied in information science. The use of framing as a knowledge representation construct is explored in terms of how it might relate to information needs and inherent concepts of information seeking and use. i A multi-dimensional, in-depth, long-term case study methodology was employed to collect data. The complex problem environment chosen was parents’ sensemaking behavior when choosing a school for their child. As part of this methodology, software was developed to capture or surface participants’ mental activity associated with framing the problem and defining their information needs. Participants used the software for a seven to ten week period as they attempted to make sense of the issue of school choice. Participants also kept journals documenting their thought processes and were interviewed every other week throughout the study. As a result, data supporting the study consisted of software usage logs, journal entries, user generated knowledge maps, and extensive interview data. A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to guide data collection and analysis, and theory development. Using this approach the frame-based theory of information behavior emerged. This theory explains information behavior in terms of four key concepts: frames, information needs, information and context. These four concepts are described as continually evolving through processes of development and reflection. The proposed frame-based theory identifies frames as knowledge representation constructs that offer a way of understanding information needs in the context of making sense of complex problems. Key implications of this research include: 1) frames as a key concept for understanding information behavior, 2) the definition of information needs as a filter between a person’s framing of an issue and the information environment, 3) integration of the concept of context into our understanding of information behavior, 4) development and reflection loops as a means of describing the interaction between the ii four key elements of the model, 5) a way of connecting and extending information science to other disciplines through the construct of a frame, and 6) an approach to informing the development of systems and resources that support sensemaking. iii Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY .................................................................................................... 1 RESEARCH MOTIVATION AND ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................................................ 1 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................. 2 RESEARCH JUSTIFICATION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Information Needs Research .......................................................................................................................... 4 Problem Framing Research ............................................................................................................................ 5 Information Framing and Information Needs Development Research .......................................................... 6 Public Policy Research .................................................................................................................................... 7 RESEARCH PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................................ 8 DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS ................................................................................................................... 9 Complex Problems ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Framing ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 Sensemaking ................................................................................................................................................ 10 SCOPE OF STUDY ................................................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH GROUNDING ................................................................... 12 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 INFORMATION NEED .............................................................................................................................................. 13 The Definition of “Need” in Cognate Fields .................................................................................................. 14 Information Needs and IS ............................................................................................................................ 15 Historical Evolution of Information Need Research within IS ...................................................................... 17 Information Paradigms and Models ............................................................................................................ 22 Social Constructionist or Social View ........................................................................................................... 25 New Inquiries ............................................................................................................................................... 28 A working definition of “information needs” ............................................................................................... 28 iv SENSEMAKING ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Information Science and Communications: Dervin ...................................................................................... 32 The ontological-epistemological divide: the in-between ......................................................................................... 34 “Verbing” as a primary ontological category ............................................................................................................ 34 Individuals as Theorists ............................................................................................................................................ 35 Discontinuity and Continuity .................................................................................................................................... 35 Linear vs. non-linear representations ....................................................................................................................... 37 Singular vs. multiple (complexity) ............................................................................................................................ 38 Purposive and Individual .......................................................................................................................................... 38 HCI Perspective: Russell, Steffik, Card, Pirolli ............................................................................................... 39 Cognitive Problem Solving Perspective: Klein et al. ..................................................................................... 40 Organizational Studies: Weick and Snowden .............................................................................................. 43 Karl Weick’s conception of sensemaking ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Everyday Life Information Seeking
    Everyday Life Information Seeking Reijo Savolainen Department of Information Studies and Interactive Media, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland Folksonomies Ethiopia– Abstract Information seeking may be analyzed in two major contexts: job-related and nonwork. The present entry concentrates on nonwork information seeking, more properly called everyday life information seeking (ELIS). Typically, ELIS studies discuss the ways in which people access and use various information sources to meet information needs in areas such as health, consumption, and leisure. The entry specifies the concept of ELIS and characterizes the major ELIS models. They include the Sense-Making approach (Dervin), the Small world theory (Chatman), the ecological model of ELIS (Williamson), ELIS in the context of way of life (Savolainen), the model of information practices (McKenzie), and the concept of information grounds (Fisher). ELIS practices tend to draw on the habitualized use of a limited number of sources which have been found useful in previous use contexts. Since the late 1990s, the Internet has increasingly affected the ELIS practices by providing easily accessible sources. Even though the popularity of the networked sources has grown rapidly they will complement, rather than replace, more traditional sources and channels. INTRODUCTION THE CONCEPT OF ELIS Information seeking is a major constituent of information Thus far, a rich variety of themes have been explored in behavior or information practices, that is, the entirety of ELIS studies. They have focused on people belonging to ways in which people seek, use, and share information in diverse groups such as the following: different contexts.[1,2] Information seeking may be ana- lyzed in two major contexts: job-related and nonwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development
    Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development Carole L. Palmer Lauren C. Teffeau Carrie M. Pirmann Graduate School of Library & Information Science (GSLIS) Center for Informatics Research in Science & Scholarship (CIRSS) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign A publication of OCLC Research Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development Carole L. Palmer, Lauren C. Teffeau and Carrie M. Pirmann for OCLC Research © 2009 OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. All rights reserved January 2009 OCLC Research Dublin, Ohio 43017 USA www.oclc.org ISBN: 1-55653-408-6 (978-1-55653-408-9) OCLC (WorldCat): 298733494 Please direct correspondence to: Constance Malpas Program Officer [email protected] Suggested citation: Palmer, Carole L., Lauren C. Teffeau and Carrie M. Pirmann. 2009. Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development. Report commissioned by OCLC Research. Published online at: www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2009-02.pdf Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope of the literature .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inst Xxx: Information User Needs & Assessment
    INST408A_Consumer_Health_Informatics_Syllabus_Fall2019_StJean&Jardine_Final INST 408A-0101 Special Topics in Information Science: Consumer Health Informatics College of Information Studies, University of Maryland Mondays, 2:00 – 4:45 PM (Hornbake Library, North Wing, Room 0302H) Fall 2019 Co-Instructors: Beth St. Jean, Associate Professor Fiona Jardine, Doctoral Candidate Hornbake Building, Room 4117K Hornbake Building, Room 4105 301-405-6573 301-602-3936 [email protected] [email protected] Office Hours: Beth St. Jean: Mondays, 5:00 to 6:00 PM, or by appointment. Fiona Jardine: Fridays 12:00 to 1:00 PM, or by appointment. Our Liaison Librarian: Rachel Gammons, Head of Teaching and Learning Services, 4100C McKeldin Library, [email protected], 301-405-9120. [Research Guide: https://lib.guides.umd.edu/information_studies] Catalog Description [Prerequisite: INST 201 (Introduction to Information Science)] In this course, we will investigate the fields of Consumer Health Informatics and Information Behavior, focusing most heavily on their intersection – Consumer Health Information Behavior. We will explore people’s health-related information needs and whether, how, and why people seek out and use (or do not seek out and use) health information and the types of health information they find useful. We will also cover the important and interrelated topics of information avoidance, health behaviors, health literacy, digital health literacy, doctor-patient communication, and patient-to-patient communication through support groups and online communities. Throughout the course, we will also focus on the important concept of health justice – an ideal state in which everyone has an adequate and equitable capability to be healthy. We will identify populations that frequently experience social injustice and explore the information-related causes and broader consequences of the health inequities members of these populations tend to face.
    [Show full text]
  • What's in a Mental Model of a Dynamic System? Conceptual Structure and Model Comparison
    What’s in a mental model of a dynamic system? Conceptual structure and model comparison Martin Schaffernicht Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales Universidad de Talca Avenida Lircay s/n 3460000 Talca, CHILE [email protected] Stefan N. Groesser University of St. Gallen Institute of Management System Dynamics Group Dufourstrasse 40a CH - 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland Tel: +41 71 224 23 82 / Fax: +41 71 224 23 55 [email protected] Contribution to the International System Dynamics Conference 2009 Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A. Abstract This paper deals with the representation of mental models of dynamic systems (MMDS). Improving ’mental models’ has always been fundamental in the field of system dynamics. Even though a specific definition exists, no conceptual model of the structure of a MMDS has been offered so far. Previous research about the learning effects of system dynamics interventions have used two methods to represent and analyze mental models. To what extend is the result of these methods comparable? Can they be used to account for a MMDS which is suitable for the system dynamics methodology? Two exemplary MMDSs are compared with both methods. We have found that the procedures and results differ significantly . In addition, neither of the methods can account for the concept of feedback loops. Based on this finding, we propose a conceptual model for the structure of a MMDS, a method to compare them, and a revised definition of MMDS. The paper concludes with a call for more substantive research. Keywords : Mental models, dynamic systems, mental model comparison, graph theory, mental model measurement Introduction Mental models have been a key concept in system dynamics from the beginning of the field (Forrester, 1961).
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology, Meaning Making and the Study of Worldviews: Beyond Religion and Non-Religion
    Psychology, Meaning Making and the Study of Worldviews: Beyond Religion and Non-Religion Ann Taves, University of California, Santa Barbara Egil Asprem, Stockholm University Elliott Ihm, University of California, Santa Barbara Abstract: To get beyond the solely negative identities signaled by atheism and agnosticism, we have to conceptualize an object of study that includes religions and non-religions. We advocate a shift from “religions” to “worldviews” and define worldviews in terms of the human ability to ask and reflect on “big questions” ([BQs], e.g., what exists? how should we live?). From a worldviews perspective, atheism, agnosticism, and theism are competing claims about one feature of reality and can be combined with various answers to the BQs to generate a wide range of worldviews. To lay a foundation for the multidisciplinary study of worldviews that includes psychology and other sciences, we ground them in humans’ evolved world-making capacities. Conceptualizing worldviews in this way allows us to identify, refine, and connect concepts that are appropriate to different levels of analysis. We argue that the language of enacted and articulated worldviews (for humans) and worldmaking and ways of life (for humans and other animals) is appropriate at the level of persons or organisms and the language of sense making, schemas, and meaning frameworks is appropriate at the cognitive level (for humans and other animals). Viewing the meaning making processes that enable humans to generate worldviews from an evolutionary perspective allows us to raise news questions for psychology with particular relevance for the study of nonreligious worldviews. Keywords: worldviews, meaning making, religion, nonreligion Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Raymond F.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Information Seeking Behavior and Library Use Pattern of Researchers in the Banasthali University
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln March 2013 Study of Information Seeking Behavior and Library Use Pattern of Researchers in the Banasthali University A.K. Pareek Banasthali University, [email protected] Madan S. Rana Assam University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Pareek, A.K. and Rana, Madan S., "Study of Information Seeking Behavior and Library Use Pattern of Researchers in the Banasthali University" (2013). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 887. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/887 Study of Information Seeking Behavior and Library Use Pattern of Researchers in the Banasthali University A.K.Pareek* Madan S. Rana** Abstract This study was undertaken to determine the information seeking behavior and library use by research scholars at the Banasthali University. The overall purpose of the study was to determine what their information requirements and also determine their awareness of library services available to them. The study collected data on the information requirements of researchers. Data were gathered from 100 researchers out of 150 through open and closed questionnaire. Findings indicate that guidance in the use of library resources and services is necessary to help researchers meet some of their information requirements. Keywords: Information seeking behavior; Library resources; e-resources; Inter-Library Loan (ILL); Documentary delivery. Introduction In library and information science research is a substantial body of work addressing information-related behavior, including information needs, information seeking and use of information resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Holistic Mental Model Confrontation in Driving Conceptual Change
    Learning and Instruction xxx (2011) 1e15 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Learning and Instruction journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/learninstruc Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change Soniya Gadgil a,*, Timothy J. Nokes-Malach a, Michelene T.H. Chi b a Department of Psychology, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, United States b Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, United States article info abstract Article history: Prior research on conceptual change has identified multiple kinds of misconceptions at different levels of Received 17 July 2010 representational complexity including false beliefs, flawed mental models, and incorrect ontological Received in revised form categories. We hypothesized that conceptual change of a mental model requires change in the system of 5 June 2011 relations between the features of the prior model. To test this hypothesis, we compared instruction aimed Accepted 8 June 2011 at revising knowledge at the mental model level called holistic confrontation e in which the learner compares and contrasts a diagram of his or her flawed mental model to an expert model e to instruction Keywords: aimed at revising knowledge at the false belief level e in which the learner is prompted to self-explain Learning Conceptual change the expert model alone. We found evidence that participants who engaged in holistic confrontation were Comparison more likely to acquire a correct mental model, and a deeper understanding of the systems of relations in Mental models the model than those who were prompted to self-explain the expert model. The results are discussed in Self-explanation terms of their implications for science instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Information-Seeking Behaviour of Undergraduate Extension Program Students in Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln Winter 2-1-2021 Understanding Information-Seeking Behaviour of Undergraduate Extension Program Students in Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia Indah Perdana Kusuma Universitas Indonesia, [email protected] Taufik Asmiyanto Universitas Indonesia, [email protected] Rahmi Rahmi Universitas Indonesia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Kusuma, Indah Perdana; Asmiyanto, Taufik; and Rahmi, Rahmi, "Understanding Information-Seeking Behaviour of Undergraduate Extension Program Students in Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia" (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5060. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5060 Understanding Information-Seeking Behaviour of Undergraduate Extension Program Students in Faculty of Administrative Science, Universitas Indonesia Indah Perdana Kusuma1, Taufik Asmiyanto2, and Rahmi3 1 Undergraduate Student (graduated in August 2020), Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia [email protected] 2 Corresponding author, 2,3 Lecturer in Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: The information
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Models in Expert Physics Reasoning. INSTITUTION California Univ., Berkeley
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 285 736 SE 048 324 AUTHOR Roschelle, Jeremy; Greeno, James G. TITLE Mental Models in Expert Physics Reasoning. INSTITUTION California Univ., Berkeley. SPONS AGENCY Office of Naval Research, Washington, D.C. Personnel and Training Branch. REPORT NO GA-2 PUB DATE Jul 87 CONTRACT N00014-85-K-0095 NOTE 29p.; For related documents, see SE 048 323-327. PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Physics; *Problem Solving; Science Education; *Science Instruction; Sciences IDENTIFIERS *Experts; *Mental Models ABSTRACT Proposed is a relational framework for characterizing experienced physicists' representations of physics problem situations and the process of constructing these representations. A representation includes a coherent set of relations among: (1) a mental model of the objects in the situation, along with their relevant properties and relations; (2) a mental model of theoretical idealizations of objects; and (3) parameter histories based on mental simulations of both models. Evidence from protocols and a small experiment support a conclusion that experienced physicists' processes of representing problem situations (a) use informal commonsense knowledge, including envisionment of objects in the situations, and (b) are interactive, with mutual. influences between informal knowledge and their technical, theorc.t.cal knowledge. Also described are characteristics of the mental models that represent problem situations and the process of constructing them, drawing from work by artificial intelligence researchers on qualitative process models, and specifying several categories of rules that would be needed for an implementation of the system as a simulation program. (Author/RH) ********************k****2********************************************* Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Information Retrieval Behavior: a Case Study in Students of Philosophy
    Actas del I Congreso Español de Recuperación de Información (CERI 2010), Madrid, España, 15 y 16 de junio de 2010 Scientific information retrieval behavior: A case study in students of Philosophy Jesús Tramullas, Ana Sánchez Casabón Deparment of Information Sciences, University of Zaragoza Ciudad Universitaria s/n 50009, Zaragoza (Spain) {tramullas, asanchez}@unizar.es Abstract. The behavior and patterns of recovery and processing of digital information by users is a recurring theme in the literature. The study of these behaviors are carried out through observation techniques and analysis of processes, actions and decisions undertaken by users in different situations. This paper presents the data resulting from the study of patterns of recovery and management of reference information of three consecutive courses of a specialized subject. The findings obtained showed a clear difference between patterns of information retrieval and obtained prior to the end of the training process, but there has been a significant change in the ultimate goal of users or appreciable changes in their prospects for application in other environments Keywords: Information seeking behavior, information user studies, information literacy 1 Studies into information behaviour The analysis and study of users’ information behaviours is a classic theme which has been widely covered by investigation into information and documentation sciences and is reflected in the corresponding scientific publications. These studies have been covered with different methodological approaches [1] over a 50­year period, and have been extensively dealt with by Wilson [2], [3]. An international conference has been consolidated which is specifically dedicated to such studies, this being ISIC (Information Seeking in Context).
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Mental Model Paradigms for Teaching Electronic Resources
    Volume 2, 1999 Approved January 1999 ISSN: 1523-4320 www.ala.org/aasl/slr Constructing Mental Model Paradigms for Teaching Electronic Resources Julie I. Tallman, Associate Professor, Department of Instructional Technology, The University of Georgia, and Lyn Henderson, Senior Lecturer, School of Education, James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia Library media specialists activate numerous mental models when teaching electronic information literacy database access, research, and retrieval in the context of authentic school assignments. The paper identifies these models and examines what occurred when the mental models in a study sample interconnected in the complex changing environment of a lesson. Discussion focuses on the changes to the mental models the library media specialists held with respect to the electronic database, the role of the library media specialist, the lesson goals, and their teaching strategies. Findings suggest that (a) most of the library media specialists’ mental models of teaching with electronic databases were influenced by their models of teaching access, research, and retrieval with print resources and (b) even though many library media specialists identified the necessity to incorporate mental model changes for more effective teaching, these were not sufficient to counteract their habituated teaching behaviors. New policy thrusts in education are increasing the range of electronic learning technologies for use by students, placing them as central to the core curriculum, and calling for equitable access to information via these technologies (Tallman 1998). Part of this equity includes individualized instruction to help students “develop a systematic mode of inquiry to gain physical and intellectual access to information and ideas that reflect diversity of experiences, opinions, and social and cultural perspectives” (American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1988, 29).
    [Show full text]
  • Information-Seeking Behavior in the Digital Age: a Multidisciplinary Study of Academic Researchers
    Information-Seeking Behavior in the Digital Age: A Multidisciplinary Study of Academic Researchers Xuemei Ge This article focuses on how electronic information resources influence the information-seeking process in the social sciences and humanities. It examines the information-seeking behavior of scholars in these fields, and extends the David Ellis model of information-seeking behavior for social scientists, which includes six characteristics: starting, chaining, brows- ing, differentiating, monitoring, and extracting. The study was conducted at Tennessee State University (TSU). Thirty active social sciences and humanities faculty, as well as doctoral students, were interviewed about their use of electronic information resources for research purposes, their perception of electronic and print materials, their opinions concerning the Ellis model, and ways the model might apply to them. Based on the interview results, the researcher provides suggestions on how current information services and products can be improved to better serve social sciences and humanities researchers. The author makes recommenda- tions for improving library services and technologies to better meet the needs of social sciences and humanities scholars. odern modes of technology 4. FTP (file transfer protocol) have changed the information 5. Online catalogs environment in which social 6. Electronic journals sciences and humanities re- 7. Databases searchers work. The pursuit of knowledge 8. Web portals has been revolutionized, mainly through David Ellis proposed a behavior model the vast expansion of data accessible via of information-seeking behavior based the Internet. Increased knowledge of the on observations of social scientists. The information-seeking behaviors of social model includes six fundamental charac- sciences and humanities researchers is teristics of information seeking: starting, crucial to meeting their information needs.
    [Show full text]