DOCSLIB.ORG

OFFICE of the ATTORNEY GENERAL for IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Michael Pennington January 31, 2002 (775) 684-1112 ATTORNEY GENERA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OFFICE of the ATTORNEY GENERAL for IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Michael Pennington January 31, 2002 (775) 684-1112 ATTORNEY GENERA STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA Telephone (775) 684-1100 THOMAS M. PATTON Attorney General Fax (775) 684-1108 First Assistant Attorney General WEBSITE: http://ag.state.nv.us E-Mail: [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Michael Pennington January 31, 2002 (775) 684-1112 ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS NEW PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER Carson City—Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa is pleased to announce that Tom Sargent has been tapped as Public Information Officer for the Attorney General’s office. Tom comes to the position with communications, technology and management experience in both the public and private sector, most visibly as the Director of TMCC’s Institute for Business and Industry. He will be the liaison between the Attorney General’s office and the media, as well as managing special projects during the remainder of her term. “Tom has an interesting mix of experience that will be of particular value now as we work to fulfill our commitment to citizens and consumers over this coming year. In addition to assisting us with keeping the public informed, we have a number of projects for him that will benefit the State both now and in the future,” Del Papa said. Tom will operate from the Attorney General’s Carson City office. He fills the position vacated by Steve George, who has since taken a position with Secretary of State Dean Heller. ### STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA Telephone (775) 684-1100 THOMAS M. PATTON Attorney General Fax (775) 684-1108 First Assistant Attorney General WEBSITE: http://ag.state.nv.us E-Mail: [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Tim Terry January 31, 2002 (775) 687-4704 COMPANY AND PRESIDENT PLEAD GUILTY TO MEDICAID FRAUD Las Vegas—Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa announced today that Reliable Medical Care, Inc. and its President, Lilliana Vazquez Mirchou, appeared in Clark County District Court, Department XI, Judge Michael L. Douglas presiding, to plead guilty to Medicaid Fraud allegations. Ms. Mirchou, both individually and as the officer of Reliable Medical Care, Inc. along with her brother, Rogelio Vazquez, were originally charged with four counts of Felony Medicaid Fraud - Submitting False Claims and two counts of Gross Misdemeanor Medicaid Fraud. Each felony carried a potential of four years incarceration and a $5,000.00 fine. “When a company agrees to provide services for Medicaid recipients, it enters into a position of trust with all Nevadans,” Del Papa said. “When a company violates that trust, the operators may be held personally liable.” Reliable Medical Care, Inc., pled guilty to single counts of both Felony Medicaid Fraud and Conspiracy to Commit Medicaid Fraud. Additionally, Ms. Mirchou entered a no contest plea to a single gross misdemeanor count of Medicaid Fraud: Failure to Maintain Records. Judge Douglas accepted the pleas and rendered both defendants guilty. Sentencing will be on July 16, 2002. Ms. Mirchou will also pay the State of Nevada $400,000 for restitution, penalties, and costs. Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU) Director Tim Terry said the charges stem from an investigation into allegations that Mirchou’s company was improperly billing for services that either did not occur or were provided by someone other than the person listed on the billing claim. Rogelio Vasquez was allegedly employed in the billing department and has an outstanding warrant for his arrest. Anyone with questions about Medicaid fraud or the Attorney General’s policy towards those who are voluntary self-reporters of provider fraud is urged to contact the MFCU in Carson City at (775) 687-4704 or in Las Vegas at (702) 486-3420. Medicaid fraud information can also be found on the Attorney General’s web site at http://ag.state.nv.us. # # # # STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 100 North Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA Telephone (775) 684-1100 THOMAS M. PATTON Attorney General Fax (775) 684-1108 First Assistant Attorney General WEBSITE: http://www.ag.state.nv.us E-Mail: [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Kateri Cavin January 30, 2002 (775) 684-1218 ATTORNEY GENERAL FILES SUIT ON BEHALF OF SECRETARY OF STATE AGAINST DELINQUENT CANDIDATES Carson City—Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa announced today that her office has filed suit against 18 candidates who either failed to file Contribution and Expenditure Reports (C&E Reports) during the 2000 election cycle, or filed their C&E Report late and have failed to pay fines imposed by Secretary of State Dean Heller. These candidates have also failed to respond to correspondence from the Attorney General’s office. “One of the responsibilities of this office is to represent constitutional officers, so on behalf of the Secretary of State we are pursuing these lawsuits,” Del Papa stated. Heller said, “As the state’s chief elections officer, I take my responsibility to require candidates to adhere to Nevada’s disclosure statutes very seriously. I believe very strongly in the public’s right to know and have worked hard during my tenure as Secretary of State to pass legislation requiring full financial disclosure by candidates.” Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 294A.120 and 294.200 require every candidate for state, district, county or township office to file a C&E Report. Each candidate in the state of Nevada is presumed to have knowledge of the laws when he/she files their declaration of candidacy. At that time, each candidate receives instructions from the filing officer notifying the candidate of his/her requirement to file timely C&E Reports. Additionally, at the time candidates file for office, they are provided with and sign an acknowledgement wherein they swear that they understand that: (1) they received the required forms and filing date schedule; (2) they must file the forms by the specified statutory date for each reporting period; (3) a violation of the reporting requirements set forth in NRS chapter 294A may result in a civil penalty of up to $5,000 for each violation, in addition to payment of court costs and attorney’s fees; and (4) they must file the required reports even though they neither received campaign contributions nor made campaign expenditures, withdrew their candidacy, had no opposition, lost the primary, or their name did not appear on either the primary or general election ballot. -more- “Protecting Citizens, Solving Problems, Making Government Work” Prior to referring the cases to the Attorney General’s office, the Secretary of State’s office sent several notices to each of the delinquent candidates informing them of the need to file their C&E Reports and that they risked the possibility of additional fines if they failed to do so. # # # # List of candidates attached. C&Es – Court Complaints Filed Marion Bennett ($5,750) – did not file #3 Assembly – Clark Vickie Cross ($3,275) – filed #2 late School Board – Nye Chuck Geshlider ($15,000) – no filings Pahrump Town Board - Nye Byron Goynes ($5,150) – filed all three late Assembly – Clark Christopher Grant ($25) – filed #2 late Assembly – Clark Craig Jorgenson ($15,000) – no filings District Judge - Nye Robert Koger ($5,000) – did not file #3 Fire District – Humboldt Danny Lunsford ($10,050) – did not file #2 and #3 Fernley Town Board - Lyon Carol McCracken ($50) – filed #3 late School Board - Storey Verla Purdy ($75) – filed #2 late Public Administrator - Nye Chester Richardson ($15,000) – no filings Assembly – Clark Sean Ryan ($225) – filed #1 late Fernley Swim Pool GID - Lyon Bradley Smith ($225) – filed #2 late Assembly – Clark Diane Titus ($15,000) – no filings Fernley Swim Pool GID – Lyon Roland Weddell ($11,775) – filed all 3 late Justice of the Peace – Carson City Jeff White ($5,100) – did not file #3 County Commission – Clark Lee Wilson ($525) – filed #1 late School Board - Storey Jane Wisdom ($25) – filed #1 late Pahrump Town Board - Nye C&E press 102 STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 FRANKIE SUE DEL PAPA Telephone (775) 684-1100 THOMAS M. PATTON Attorney General Fax (775) 684-1108 First Assistant Attorney General WEBSITE: http://ag.state.nv.us E-Mail: [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Marta Adams January 25, 2002 (775) 684-1237 ATTORNEY GENERAL CITES TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD’S FINDING AS MORE EVIDENCE OF DOE’S PREMATURE ACTION Carson City—Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa cites a finding of the President’s Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board as more evidence that the Department of Energy is moving forward with the Yucca Mountain Project without an adequate scientific foundation. In a letter from the Board to the Secretary of Energy, the Board states that “when the DOE’s technical and scientific work is taken as a whole, the Board’s view is that the technical basis for the DOE’s repository performance estimates is weak to moderate at this time.” “The Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board’s assessment of the weak foundation upon which the DOE is proceeding, combined with the recent findings of the General Accounting Office, show that DOE is not proceeding on sound science but is instead rushing to a judgment that is not supported by science at all,” stated Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa. “Certainly, if Secretary of Energy Abraham goes ahead with a site recommendation, as he has indicated he will, his action takes place with an incomplete and weak to moderate technical basis,” explained Del Papa.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2019
    The Department of Health and Human Services And The Department of Justice Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2019 June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary 1 II. Statutory Background 3 III. Program Results and Accomplishments 5 Monetary Results 5 Expenditures 7 Overall Recoveries 8 Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team 8 Health Care Fraud Prevention Partnership 10 Strike Forces 10 Opioid Fraud and Abuse Detection Unit 13 Highlights of Successful Criminal and Civil Investigations 14 IV. Department of Health and Human Services 39 Office of Inspector General 39 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 61 Administration on Community Living 85 Office of the General Counsel 88 Food and Drug Administration Pharmaceutical Fraud Program 91 V. Department of Justice 95 United States Attorneys 95 Civil Division 96 Criminal Division 102 Civil Rights Division 107 Department of Justice Office of Inspector General 110 VI. Appendix 112 Federal Bureau of Investigation 112 Return on Investment Calculation 116 Total HCFAC Resources 117 VII. Glossary of Terms 118 GENERAL NOTE All years are fiscal years unless otherwise stated in the text. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) established a national Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program (HCFAC or the Program) under the joint direction of the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),1 acting through the Inspector General, designed to coordinate federal, state and local law enforcement activities with respect to health care fraud and abuse. In its twenty-third year of operation, the Program’s continued success confirms the soundness of a collaborative approach to identify and prosecute the most egregious instances of health care fraud, to prevent future fraud and abuse, and to protect program beneficiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All Times EDT
    AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All times EDT THURSDAY 7/16: 11:30am – 2:30pm EDT (2 panels) • 11:30am – 12:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Impacts and Adaptations by Innovators and Industry, Consumer Warnings and State Government Oversight Roles (60 min) Moderator: Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General, Oregon Attorney General’s Office o Lev Kubiak, Vice President and Deputy Chief Security Officer, Pfizer o Haley Schaffer, Senior Legal Counsel, 3M o Speaker TBD, Lowe’s Summary: Price gouging laws typically apply to prices of essential items needed in an emergency. Price gouging occurs when a seller increases the price of goods, services or commodities to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. Hear how Attorneys General and industry continue working together to identify and stop this practice during the pandemic. The internet has driven a dramatic increase in the expansion of the counterfeit drug market. Learn about the low- risk/high-reward nature of this criminal industry, and how regulators are stepping up to combat it. • 1pm-2:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Price Gouging Issues (90 min) Moderator: William Tong, Attorney General, Connecticut o Clayton Friedman, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP o Paul Singer, Senior Counsel for Public Protection, Texas AGO o Victoria Butler, Director, Consumer Protection Division, Florida AGO o Nicholas Trutanich, US Attorney, District of Nevada Summary: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Attorneys General have been on the watch for price gouging. As a result, several large companies have become subject to Attorney General investigations, and others have been named defendants in class action lawsuits brought by unhappy consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Elko County Nevada Water Resource Management Plan 2017
    Elko County Nevada Water Resource Management Plan 2017 Echo Lake - Ruby Mountains Elko County Board of Commissioners Elko County Natural Resource Management Advisory Commission December 6, 2017 Executive Summary The Elko County Water Resource Management Plan has been prepared to guide the development, management and use of water resources in conjunction with land use management over the next twenty-five (25) years. Use by decision makers of information contained within this plan will help to ensure that the environment of the County is sustained while at the same time enabling the expansion and diversification of the local economy. Implementation of the Elko County Water Resource Management Plan will assist in maintaining the quality of life enjoyed by residents and visitors of Elko County now and in the future. Achievement of goals outlined in the plan will result in water resources found within Elko County being utilized in a manner beneficial to the residents of Elko County and the State of Nevada. The State of Nevada Water Plan represents that Elko County will endure a loss of population and agricultural lands over the next twenty-five years. Land use and development patterns prepared by Elko County do not agree with this estimated substantial loss of population and agricultural lands. The trends show that agricultural uses in Elko County are stable with minimal notable losses each year. Development patterns represent that private lands that are not currently utilized for agricultural are being developed in cooperation and conjunction with agricultural uses. In 2007, Elko County was the largest water user in the State of Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREG-1710 Vol 1 History of Water
    NUREG-1710 Vol. 1 History of Water Development in the Amargosa Desert Area: A Literature Review i I I I I I I I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste Washington, DC 20555-0001 AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS 7 NRC Reference Material Non-NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access Documents available from public and special technical NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at libraries include all open literature items, such as NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at books, journal articles, and transactions, Federal http://www.nrc.pov/reading-rm.html. Register notices, Federal and State legislation, and Publicly released records include, to name a few, congressional reports. Such documents as theses, NUREG-series publications; Federal Register notices; dissertations, foreign reports and translations, and applicant, licensee, and vendor documents and non-NRC conference proceedings may be purchased correspondence; NRC correspondence and internal from their sponsoring organization. memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers and their attachments. Copies of industry codes and standards used in a substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC maintained at- regulations, and Title 10, Energy, in the Code of The NRC Technical Library Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one Two White Flint North of these two sources. 11545 Rockville Pike 1. The Superintendent of Documents Rockville, MD 20852-2738 U.S. Government Printing Office Mail Stop SSOP Washington, DC 20402-0001 These standards are available in the library for Intemet: bookstore.gpo.gov reference use by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Hot Topics in Fraud and Abuse Enforcement Involving Health Care Providers
    Hot Topics in Fraud and Abuse Enforcement Involving Health Care Providers Stephen C. Payne (moderator) Winston Y. Chan John D. W. Partridge Jonathan M. Phillips September 22, 2016 Agenda • Applicable Law • Enforcement Trends • Enforcement Theories • Recent Legal Developments • Questions 2 Applicable Law The False Claims Act (FCA) • The FCA, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733, is the federal government’s primary weapon to redress fraud against government agencies and programs. • The FCA provides for recovery of civil penalties and treble damages from any person who knowingly submits or causes the submission of false or fraudulent claims to the United States for money or property. “It seems quite clear that the objective of Congress was broadly • Under the FCA, the Attorney General, through DOJ to protect the funds attorneys, investigates and pursues FCA cases (except in and property of the declined qui tam cases). Government from fraudulent claims ….” Rainwater v. United States, 356 U.S. 590 (1958) 4 FCA – Key Provisions 31 U.S.C. Statutory Prohibition Summary § 3729(a)(1) (A) Knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, False/Fraudulent Claim a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval (B) Knowingly makes, uses or causes to be made or False used, a false record or statement material to a Record/Statement false or fraudulent claim (C) Knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly “Reverse” False Claim avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government (G) Conspires to violate a liability provision of
    [Show full text]
  • White Collar Crime by Health Care Providers Pamela H
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 67 | Number 4 Article 7 4-1-1989 Fraud by Fright: White Collar Crime by Health Care Providers Pamela H. Bucy Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Pamela H. Bucy, Fraud by Fright: White Collar Crime by Health Care Providers, 67 N.C. L. Rev. 855 (1989). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol67/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FRAUD BY FRIGHT: WHITE COLLAR CRIME BY HEALTH CARE PROVIDERSt PAMELA H. Bucyt Fraudby health care providers is one of the most deleterious of all white collar crimes. It is also one of the most difficult to prosecute. In her Article, ProfessorBucy comparesfraud by health care providers with other types of white collar crime and analyzes the theories offraud his- torically used to prosecute health careproviders. She concludes that the strongest theory--prosecutionfor providing unnecessary or substandard health care-is the theory that has been used the least. ProfessorBucy suggests ways for prosecutors to use this theory more often and more effectively in order to combat a problem that ravishes human dignity and personal health as well as the nationalpocketbook "I will apply measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice." Portion of Oath of Hippocrates, Sixth Century B.C.- First Century A.D.; currently administered by many medical schools to graduating medical students.1 "[I c]ould make a million dollars out of the suckers .....
    [Show full text]
  • Spatially-Explicit Modeling of Modern and Pleistocene Runoff and Lake Extent in the Great Basin Region, Western United States
    Spatially-explicit modeling of modern and Pleistocene runoff and lake extent in the Great Basin region, western United States Yo Matsubara1 Alan D. Howard1 1Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia P.O. Box 400123 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4123 Abstract A spatially-explicit hydrological model balancing yearly precipitation and evaporation is applied to the Great Basin Region of the southwestern United States to predict runoff magnitude and lake distribution during present and Pleistocene climatic conditions. The model iteratively routes runoff through, and evaporation from, depressions to find a steady state solution. The model is calibrated with spatially-explicit annual precipitation estimates and compiled data on pan evaporation, mean annual temperature, and total yearly runoff from stations. The predicted lake distribution provides a close match to present-day lakes. For the last glacial maximum the sizes of lakes Bonneville and Lahontan were well predicted by linear combinations of decrease in mean annual temperature from 0 to 6 °C and increases in precipitation from 0.8 to 1.9 times modern values. Estimated runoff depths were about 1.2 to 4.0 times the present values and yearly evaporation about 0.3 to 1 times modern values. 2 1. Introduction The Great Basin of the southwestern United States in the Basin and Range physiographic province contains enclosed basins featuring perennial and ephemeral lakes, playas and salt pans (Fig. 1). The Great Basin consists of the entire state of Nevada, western Utah, and portions of California, Idaho, Oregon, and Wyoming. At present it supports an extremely dry, desert environment; however, about 40 lakes (some reaching the size of present day Great Lakes) episodically occupied the Great Basin, most recently during the last glacial maximum (LGM) [Snyder and Langbein, 1962; Hostetler et al., 1994; Madsen et al., 2001].
    [Show full text]
  • 173-14: Annual Report FY 2014, 7/1/2013 to June 30/2014
    173-14 Annual Report Fiscal Year 2014 July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 State of Nevada Office of State Treasurer Kate Marshall OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER September 28, 2014 Dear Gov. Sandoval and Members of the Legislature: As required by NRS 226.120, it is my pleasure to present you with the State Treasurer’s Office Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2014 (FY14). As we began the process of updating what will be my final Annual Report as State Treasurer, I couldn’t help but think about what we have accomplished during my eight years in office. I am extremely proud of the many programs we have instituted that are and will continue to make a significant difference in the lives of Nevadans, as well as the vast improvements we have incorporated that save taxpayer dollars while at the same time increasing efficiency. When I was first elected to office in 2006, I ran on a platform I called the “Marshall Plan,” which included seven main points. The basic tenets were simple: improve and implement programs that would save taxpayer dollars; reduce spending by becoming more efficient; and identify innovative methods for increasing economic development in our state. It gives me a deep sense of satisfaction that with the help of my staff and many partners, we have been able to fulfill the basic tenets I laid out nearly eight years ago. As administrator of the Nevada College Savings Plans, I am enormously satisfied to report that during my term, the number of Nevadans saving for college through the establishment of 529 accounts has risen by 52%.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Dietary Supplements Hearing
    S. HRG. 108–997 REGULATION OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION OCTOBER 28, 2003 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 20–196 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:04 May 24, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\20196.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina, CONRAD BURNS, Montana Ranking TRENT LOTT, Mississippi DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN B. BREAUX, Louisiana GORDON SMITH, Oregon BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois RON WYDEN, Oregon JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada BARBARA BOXER, California GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire MARIA CANTWELL, Washington FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JEANNE BUMPUS, Republican Staff Director and General Counsel ROBERT W. CHAMBERLIN, Republican Chief Counsel KEVIN D. KAYES, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel GREGG ELIAS, Democratic General Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:04 May 24, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\20196.TXT JACKIE C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on October 28, 2003 .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    Attorney General Doug Peterson News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 5, 2019 Attorney General Peterson Urges Congress to Take Action Against Robocalls Lincoln – Today, Attorney General Peterson urged the U.S. Senate to enact the Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence (TRACED) Act, legislation to curb illegal robocalls and spoofing. A coalition of 51 attorneys general, led by Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson, North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein, New Hampshire Attorney General Gordon J. MacDonald, and Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, sent a letter to the U. S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation supporting the TRACED Act. The legislation is sponsored by Sens. John Thune and Ed Markey. Attorney General Peterson said, “State attorneys general are on the front lines of helping consumers who are harassed and scammed by unwanted calls. For years, we have worked with both our federal counterparts and industry participants to encourage the adoption of technological solutions in the fight against these calls. I am proud to support this legislation.” In their letter, the attorneys general state that the TRACED Act enables states, federal regulators, and telecom providers to take steps to combat these illegal calls. The legislation will require voice service providers to participate in a call authentication framework to help block unwanted calls and creates an interagency working group to take additional actions to reduce robocalls and hold telemarketers and robocallers accountable. More than 48 billion robocalls were made in 2018, making them the number one source of consumer complaints to the FTC and the FCC and resulting in millions in consumer losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of State and Local Government
    DIRECTORY OF STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT Prepared by RESEARCH DIVISION LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU 2020 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Please refer to the Alphabetical Index to the Directory of State and Local Government for a complete list of agencies. NEVADA STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ............................................. D-9 CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION ............................................................................................. D-13 DIRECTORY OF STATE GOVERNMENT CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS: Attorney General ........................................................................................................................ D-15 State Controller ........................................................................................................................... D-19 Governor ..................................................................................................................................... D-20 Lieutenant Governor ................................................................................................................... D-27 Secretary of State ........................................................................................................................ D-28 State Treasurer ............................................................................................................................ D-30 EXECUTIVE BOARDS ................................................................................................................. D-31 NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Law Powers of the Nevada Attorney General: Ryan V
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\14-3\NVJ315.txt unknown Seq: 1 21-MAY-14 10:00 THE COMMON LAW POWERS OF THE NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL: RYAN V. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT Robert Stewart* The office of the attorney general derived from thirteenth-century England and voyaged with the American settlers across the Atlantic, ultimately taking root in each of the thirteen original colonies.1 There, the colonial attorneys general took on a wide variety of duties,2 many of which originated from the common law, such as being “intrusted with the management of all legal affairs and the prosecution of all suits, civil and criminal, in which the crown was interested.”3 Time passed, the nation expanded, and now every state wields an attorney general.4 The majority of states uphold their attorneys general’s com- mon law powers5—while simultaneously authorizing legislatures to withdraw * Juris Doctorate Candidate, May 2014, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Articles Editor, Nevada Law Journal Volume 14. 1 See William P. Marshall, Break Up the Presidency? Governors, State Attorneys General, and Lessons from the Divided Executive, 115 YALE L.J. 2446, 2449–50 (2006). 2 For example, in 1708, the duties of the South Carolina Attorney General were specified as follows: [T]o Act, Plead, Implead, Sue and Prosecute all and every Person & Persons whatsoever, for all Debts, Fines, Amerciaments, Forfeitures, Escheats Claims and Demands whatsoever which now is or may or Shall be Due and in Arrears to Us upon any Account whatsoever whither Rents, Revenues or otherwise howsoever, And to Prosecute all Matters Criminall as well as Civill Giv- ing and hereby Granting unto You full Power and authority and the Premises therein to Deal Doe Execute and Performe in as large and Ample manner to all Intents and Purposes as to the Said office of Attorney Generall doth in any way Appertaine & bellong .
    [Show full text]