Jean-Claude Risset to Compare the Playing of the Pianist Own Research Led Him to Successfully (1938–2016) to a Sporting Act

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jean-Claude Risset to Compare the Playing of the Pianist Own Research Led Him to Successfully (1938–2016) to a Sporting Act News Jean-Claude Risset to compare the playing of the pianist own research led him to successfully (1938–2016) to a sporting act. In parallel with synthesize copper trumpet sounds his scientific studies, Jean-Claude and various other natural sounds, [Editor’s note: We thank Evelyn Risset took private lessons to train under the watchful eye and ear of Gayou of the Institut National de himself in music. From 1961 to 1964 Edgard Varese.` In 1968, Jean-Claude l’Audiovisuel Groupe de Recherches he studied the piano with Robert Tri- Risset composed his first work that Musicales (INA-GRM) for writing maille and Huguette Goullon (pupils used sounds synthesized by com- Computer Suite from Little this obituary and tribute.] of Alfred Cortot), harmony and coun- puter: Boy Born in Le Puy-en-Velay, France, terpoint with Suzanne Demarquez, . It was precisely to illustrate the in 1938, Jean-Claude Risset (see and composition with Andre´ Jolivet endless fall of the bomb, “Little Boy,” Figure 1) would become not only a (pupil of Edgard Varese).` In 1962 and that he began to work on “paradox- musician recognized by the interna- 1963, he attended the Jolivet summer ical sounds” and acoustic illusions: tional artistic community, but also an course at the French Center of Mu- sounds that rise or fall perpetually, undisputed theorist of the technolog- sical Humanism in Aix-en-Provence glissandi that go up and down at the ical musical adventure of the second where he met Darius Milhaud, Henri same time. In 1968, during his second half of the 20th century. Dutilleux, and Lejaren Hiller. Ris- stay at Bell Labs (1967–1969), Risset As a student at the Ecole´ Normale set was already impassioned by all attended John Chowning’s demon- Superieure´ (ENS) in Paris from 1957 that was new in music. He also ap- stration of the results of his first to 1964, he obtained an Aggregation proached Pierre Schaeffer’s Groupe experiments on frequency modula- of Physics in 1961 under the direc- de Recherches Musicales (GRM) and tion (FM). Chowning communicated ´ tion of Professor Pierre Grivet, on met Abraham Moles, Emile Leipp, to Risset his synthesis data; the latter the subject of “Analysis, Synthesis, and Michel Philippot; the latter put would soon use them to animate the Mutations Perception of Sounds, Studied with him in contact with Pierre Barbaud sounds in his work . the Help of Electronic Computers.” (an eminent French representative of All these pioneers of computer As a sportsman, he participated in automatic music composition). From music become friends at work but student athletics and basketball com- his first steps as a musician, Risset also in life, and forever. A year would petitions at ENS, which led him later kept a taste for elaborate tones and not pass without one crossing the timbres, but also a rigor in his work, Atlantic to find his friends for a doi:10.1162/COMJ e 00418 instilled by his various professors. colloquium, a symposium, exchanges It was also his professor Grivet (an on their research work, master classes influential advocate of electronics in universities in the four corners of research in France) who encouraged the world, or even a family holiday. him to join Max Mathews and his In 1969, the GRM under Scha- team at the Bell Telephone Laborato- effer in Paris, through its research ries in New Jersey to pursue research engineer Enrico Chiarucci (in charge in the framework of his thesis. There, of emerging technologies), received after much hesitation about his fu- from Jean-Claude Risset a copy of ture, torn between art and science, Max Mathews’s Music V software. he finally saw his contribution to the This gift would allow the GRM to field as undertaking a unique path bridge the gap in computer music simply combining art and science on and embark on a great adventure a daily basis. The year was 1964. of computer-based sound-processing During his first stay at Bell Labs developments guided by the concepts in 1964–1965, he notably met not of musique concrete` .Franc¸ois Bayle, only Edgard Varese` but also John R. director of the GRM after Schaeffer, Pierce, Newman Guttman, and, of then commissioned a piece from course, Max Mathews. From then on, Jean-Claude Risset, which became the synthesis of sounds by computer the masterpiece Mutations (for two would be one of his major centers tracks, synthesized at Bell Laborato- Figure 1. Jean-Claude of interest. Risset began by assisting ries and mixed at the GRM). Risset. (Photo: Rozenn Mathews in the development of the Finally, very Schaefferian in his Risset.) Music V software and, in 1965, his musical approach (as he was more News 7 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/COMJ_e_00418 by guest on 30 September 2021 interested in the effects of sound than In 1979, Jean-Claude Risset ex- In 1990, he received the National its causes), Risset composed works pressed the wish to return to his post Grand Prize of Music, which he that played with perception. At the in Marseille-Luminy to get away from perceived as a true affirmation of his same time, however, he did not deny the hectic life of IRCAM. He assessed musical work. To crown his years of the instrumental world. Mutations that he was too burdened with public research, in 1999, Risset received the II, in 1973, incorporated elements of communication tasks (a consequence Gold Medal of the CNRS, one of the the tracks synthesized at Bell Labs of IRCAM’s success) and that his most significant awards attributed to for Mutations and four acoustic in- research had suffered. So he returned scientific researchers in France. He struments. He composed Dialogues to Luminy, then to the Laboratoire had been research director at CNRS (1975) for flute, clarinet, piano, and de Mecanique´ et d’Acoustique of the since 1985. two-track tape synthesized by com- Centre National de la Recherche Sci- From the early 2000s, Jean-Claude puter in Marseille. After his return entifique (CNRS) in Marseille from Risset increasingly devoted him- to France in 1969, Risset joined the 1985 to 1999. From 1993 to 1999, he self to musical creation, alternat- Aix-Marseille University Faculty of helmed the national DEA (master’s ing mixed works, electroacoustic, Sciences at Luminy. There, he high- degree) in “Acoustics, Signal Process- instrumental—interactive or not, lighted the difference in perception ing and Computer Science Applied to sometimes spatial—until finally con- of sounds according to their pitch Music,” taught at IRCAM jointly by fronting the orchestra: Escalas (2001) or spectral height, depending on the the University of the Mediterranean and Schemes` (2007). cerebral hemispheres. He also worked and the University of Paris VI. Jean-Claude Risset kept in touch on nonlinear distortion synthesis, During this time, Jean-Claude with his pioneering companions in temporal slowing without transpo- Risset never stopped composing— computer music. Since the late 1980s, sition, synthesis by Gabor grains, mainly mixed works: Mixte (1982), he was regularly invited to Stanford hybrid synthesis, wavelets . his Passages (1982), Aventure de lignes University in California, where he contributions are innumerable. (1981), and others. On the other hand, continued his research and musical It was quite natural that in 1972 for the composition of Sud, in 1985, compositions between disciplines Pierre Boulez proposed to Jean-Claude an electroacoustic work in four tracks without hiatus. Stanford’s Center for Risset the position of director of the made at the GRM, Jean-Claude Risset Computer Research in Music and computer department of the future started from concrete` sounds recorded Acoustics (CCRMA, founded by John Institut de Recherche et de Coordina- in nature near Marseille and gradually Chowning in 1975) benefited also tion Acoustique/Musique (IRCAM) in hybridized them to synthetic sounds from the contributions of John Pierce Paris; he would occupy this post until following a grid of pitches. This piece and Max Mathews, who, following 1979 (IRCAM was officially inaugu- won the Ars Electronica Golden Nica their professional retirement, became rated in 1975). Boulez insisted that all Award in 1987. Jean-Claude Risset involved with the institution, thus the heads of departments should be also liked composing with voice: for encouraging contact and regular not only good scientists or engineers instance, L’autre face (1983), Sola interaction with the professors and but also composers. This is how Ger- (1985), Derives´ (1985), La nouvelle students. In 1993, the University of ald Bennett, head of IRCAM’s “diago- Atlantide (1988), and Etre (1989). The California, Berkeley, welcomed Risset nal” department, called on the young year 1989 was also marked by his as Kennedy Lecturer. These United and talented American artist and work Huit esquisses en duo pour un States–based engagements deeply scientist David Wessel, who would pianiste [Eight Sketches in Duet for marked Risset, who said he found now become part of the wider circle One Pianist] where Risset, the pianist, there the best working conditions of of pioneers and friends. Jean-Claude played live on a Yamaha Disklavier his life. His last visit to Stanford was Risset spent several exciting years at in duet with a computer program. in 2015. IRCAM. In addition to conducting This was the first piece in which the Risset was a Knight of the Legion research, he composed several im- computer is sensitive to the playing of Honor, Officer of Arts and Letters, portant works: Inharmonique (1977), of the human pianist. Risset had a member of many learned societies, Moments newtoniens (1977), Mirages developed the computer program a member of editorial boards in Eu- (1978), Distances (1979), and Songes that same year at the Massachusetts rope and in the world, and a man (1979).
Recommended publications
  • Navigating the Landscape of Computer Aided Algorithmic Composition Systems: a Definition, Seven Descriptors, and a Lexicon of Systems and Research
    NAVIGATING THE LANDSCAPE OF COMPUTER AIDED ALGORITHMIC COMPOSITION SYSTEMS: A DEFINITION, SEVEN DESCRIPTORS, AND A LEXICON OF SYSTEMS AND RESEARCH Christopher Ariza New York University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences New York, New York [email protected] ABSTRACT comparison and analysis, this article proposes seven system descriptors. Despite Lejaren Hiller’s well-known Towards developing methods of software comparison claim that “computer-assisted composition is difficult to and analysis, this article proposes a definition of a define, difficult to limit, and difficult to systematize” computer aided algorithmic composition (CAAC) (Hiller 1981, p. 75), a definition is proposed. system and offers seven system descriptors: scale, process-time, idiom-affinity, extensibility, event A CAAC system is software that facilitates the production, sound source, and user environment. The generation of new music by means other than the public internet resource algorithmic.net is introduced, manipulation of a direct music representation. Here, providing a lexicon of systems and research in computer “new music” does not designate style or genre; rather, aided algorithmic composition. the output of a CAAC system must be, in some manner, a unique musical variant. An output, compared to the 1. DEFINITION OF A COMPUTER-AIDED user’s representation or related outputs, must not be a ALGORITHMIC COMPOSITION SYSTEM “copy,” accepting that the distinction between a copy and a unique variant may be vague and contextually determined. This output may be in the form of any Labels such as algorithmic composition, automatic sound or sound parameter data, from a sequence of composition, composition pre-processing, computer- samples to the notation of a complete composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Wendy Reid Composer
    WENDY REID COMPOSER 1326 Shattuck Avenue #2 Berkeley, California 94709 [email protected] treepieces.net EDUCATION 1982 Stanford University, CCRMA, Post-graduate study Workshop in computer-generated music with lectures by John Chowning, Max Mathews, John Pierce and Jean-Claude Risset 1978-80 Mills College, M.A. in Music Composition Composition with Terry Riley, Robert Ashley and Charles Shere Violin and chamber music with the Kronos Quartet 1975-77 Ecoles D’Art Americaines, Palais de Fontainbleau and Paris, France: Composition with Nadia Boulanger; Classes in analysis, harmony, counterpoint, composition; Solfege with assistant Annette Dieudonne 1970-75 University of Southern California, School of Performing Arts, B.M. in Music Composition, minor in Violin Performance Composition with James Hopkins, Halsey Stevens and film composer David Raksin 1 AWARDS, GRANTS, and COMMISSIONS Meet The Composer/California Meet The Composer/New York Subito Composer Grant ASMC Grant Paul Merritt Henry Award Hellman Award The Oakland Museum The Nature Company Sound/Image Unlimited Graduate Assistantship California State Scholarship Honors at Entrance USC National Merit Award Finalist National Educational Development Award Finalist Commission, Brassiosaurus (Tomita/Djil/ Heglin):Tree Piece #52 Commission, Joyce Umamoto: Tree Piece #42 Commission, Abel-Steinberg-Winant Trio: Tree Piece #41 Commission, Tom Dambly: Tree Piece #31 Commission, Mary Oliver: Tree Piece #21 Commission, Don Buchla: Tree Piece #17 Commission, William Winant: Tree Piece #10 DISCOGRAPHY LP/Cassette: TREE PIECES (FROG RECORDS,1988/ FROG PEAK) CD: TREEPIECES(FROG RECORDS, 2002/ FROGPEAK) TREE PIECES volume 2 (NIENTE, 2004 / FROGPEAK) TREE PIECE SINGLE #1: LULU VARIATIONS (NIENTE, 2009) TREE PIECE SINGLE #2: LU-SHOO FRAGMENTS (NIENTE, 2010) 2 PUBLICATIONS Scores: Tree Pieces/Frog On Rock/Game of Tree/Klee Pieces/Glass Walls/Early Works (Frogpeak Music/Sound-Image/W.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus EMBODIED SONIC MEDITATION
    MUS CS 105 Embodied Sonic Meditation Spring 2017 Jiayue Cecilia Wu Syllabus EMBODIED SONIC MEDITATION: A CREATIVE SOUND EDUCATION Instructor: Jiayue Cecilia Wu Contact: Email: [email protected]; Cell/Text: 650-713-9655 Class schedule: CCS Bldg 494, Room 143; Mon/Wed 1:30 pm – 2:50 pm, Office hour: Phelps room 3314; Thu 1: 45 pm–3:45 pm, or by appointment Introduction What is the difference between hearing and listening? What are the connections between our listening, bodily activities, and the lucid mind? This interdisciplinary course on acoustic ecology, sound art, and music technology will give you the answers. Through deep listening (Pauline Oliveros), compassionate listening (Thich Nhat Hanh), soundwalking (Westerkamp), and interactive music controlled by motion capture, the unifying theme of this course is an engagement with sonic awareness, environment, and self-exploration. Particularly we will look into how we generate, interpret and interact with sound; and how imbalances in the soundscape may have adverse effects on our perceptions and the nature. These practices are combined with readings and multimedia demonstrations from sound theory, audio engineering, to aesthetics and philosophy. Students will engage in hands-on audio recording and mixing, human-computer interaction (HCI), group improvisation, environmental film streaming, and soundscape field trip. These experiences lead to a final project in computer-assisted music composition and creative live performance. By the end of the course, students will be able to use computer software to create sound, design their own musical gears, as well as connect with themselves, others and the world around them in an authentic level through musical expressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial: Alternative Histories of Electroacoustic Music
    This is a repository copy of Editorial: Alternative histories of electroacoustic music. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/119074/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Mooney, J orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-9634, Schampaert, D and Boon, T (2017) Editorial: Alternative histories of electroacoustic music. Organised Sound, 22 (02). pp. 143-149. ISSN 1355-7718 https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577181700005X This article has been published in a revised form in Organised Sound http://doi.org/10.1017/S135577181700005X. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Cambridge University Press Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ EDITORIAL: Alternative Histories of Electroacoustic Music In the more than twenty years of its existence, Organised Sound has rarely focussed on issues of history and historiography in electroacoustic music research.
    [Show full text]
  • 62 Years and Counting: MUSIC N and the Modular Revolution
    62 Years and Counting: MUSIC N and the Modular Revolution By Brian Lindgren MUSC 7660X - History of Electronic and Computer Music Fall 2019 24 December 2019 © Copyright 2020 Brian Lindgren Abstract. MUSIC N by Max Mathews had two profound impacts in the world of music ​ synthesis. The first was the implementation of modularity to ensure a flexibility as a tool for the user; with the introduction of the unit generator, the instrument and the compiler, composers had the building blocks to create an unlimited range of sounds. The second was the impact of this implementation in the modular analog synthesizers developed a few years later. While Jean-Claude Risset, a well known Mathews associate, asserts this, Mathews actually denies it. They both are correct in their perspectives. Introduction Over 76 years have passed since the invention of the first electronic general purpose computer,1 the ENIAC. Today, we carry computers in our pockets that can perform millions of times more calculations per second.2 With the amazing rate of change in computer technology, it's hard to imagine that any development of yesteryear could maintain a semblance of relevance today. However, in the world of music synthesis, the foundations that were laid six decades ago not only spawned a breadth of multifaceted innovation but continue to function as the bedrock of important digital applications used around the world today. Not only did a new modular approach implemented by its creator, Max Mathews, ensure that the MUSIC N lineage would continue to be useful in today’s world (in one of its descendents, Csound) but this approach also likely inspired the analog synthesizer engineers of the day, impacting their designs.
    [Show full text]
  • DSP Class III: Digital Electronic Music Concepts Overview (Part III) ADC and DAC Analog-To-Digital Conversion
    TECH 350: DSP Class III: Digital Electronic Music Concepts Overview (Part III) ADC and DAC Analog-to-Digital Conversion Parameters of ADC: • Sampling Rate (fs) = rate at which analog signal is ^ captured (sampling) (in Hertz) Intensity v • Bit Depth = number of values for each digital sample (quantization) (in bits) Time -> Limitations/Issues with Sampling Distortion caused by sampling, AKA ALIASING (or foldover) How can we rectify (or at least describe) this phenomenon? Sampling (Nyquist) Theorem •Can describe the resultant frequency of aliasing via the following (rough) formula, iff input freq. > half the sampling rate && < sampling rate: resultant frequency = sampling frequency (fs) - input frequency For example, if fs = 1000Hz and the frequency of our input is at 800Hz: 1000 - 800 = 200, so resultant frequency is 200Hz (!) •Nyquist theorem = In order to be able to reconstruct a signal, the sampling frequency must be at least twice the frequency of the signal being sampled •If you want to represent frequencies up to X Hz, you need fs = 2X Hz Ideal Sampling Frequency (for audio) •What sampling rate should we use for musical applications? •This is an on-going debate. Benefits of a higher sampling rate? Drawbacks? •AES Standards: •Why 44.1kHz? Why 48kHz? Why higher (we can’t hear up there, can we?) •For 44.1kHz and 48kHz answer lies primarily within video standard considerations, actually… •44.1kHz = 22 · 32 · 52 · 72, meaning it has a ton of integer factors •>2 * 20kHz is great, as it allows us to have frequency headroom to work with, and subharmonics (and interactions of phase, etc.) up in that range are within our audible range Anti-Aliasing Filters + Phase Correction •How to fix aliasing? Add a low-pass filter set at a special cutoff frequency before we digitize the signal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Path to Half Life
    The Path to Half-life Curtis Roads A composer does not often pause to explain a musical path. When that path is a personal break- through, however, it may be worthwhile to reflect on it, especially when it connects to more gen- eral trends in today’s musical scene. My electronic music composition Half-life por- trays a virtual world in which sounds are born and die in an instant or emerge in slow motion. As emerging sounds unfold, they remain stable or mutate before expiring. Interactions between different sounds sug- gest causalities, as if one sound spawned, trig- gered, crashed into, bonded with, or dis- solved into another sound. Thus the introduc- tion of every new sound contributes to the unfolding of a musical narrative. Most of the sound material of Half-life was produced by the synthesis of brief acoustic sound particles or grains. The interactions of acoustical particles can be likened to photo- graphs of bubble chamber experiments, which were designed to visualize atomic inter- actions. These strikingly beautiful images por- tray intricate causalities as particles enter a chamber at high speed, leading to collisions in which some particles break apart or veer off in strange directions, indicating the pres- ence of hidden forces (figure 1). Figure 1. Bubble chamber image (© CERN, Geneva). Composed years ago, in 1998 and 1999, Half-life is not my newest composition, nor does it incor- porate my most recent techniques. The equipment and software used to make it was (with exception of some custom programs) quite standard. Nonetheless this piece is deeply significant to me as a turning point in a long path of composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years of Computer Music: Ideas of the Past Speak to the Future
    Fifty Years of Computer Music: Ideas of the Past Speak to the Future John Chowning1 1 CCRMA, Department of Music, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 [email protected] Abstract. The use of the computer to analyze and synthesize sound in two early forms, additive and FM synthesis, led to new thoughts about synthesizing sound spectra, tuning and pitch. Detached from their traditional association with the timbre of acoustic instruments, spectra become structured and associated with pitch in ways that are unique to the medium of computer music. 1 Introduction In 1957, just fifty years ago, Max Mathews introduced a wholly new means of mak- ing music. An engineer/scientist at Bell Telephone Laboratories (BTL), Max (with the support of John Pierce, who was director of research) created out of numbers and code the first music to be produced by a digital computer. It is usually the case that a fascination with some aspect of a discipline outside of one’s own will quickly con- clude with an experiment without elaboration. But in Max’s case, it was the begin- ning of a profoundly deep and consequential adventure, one which he modestly in- vited us all to join through his elegantly conceived programs, engendering tendrils that found their way into far-flung disciplines that today, 50 years later, continue to grow without end. From the very beginning Max’s use of the computer for making music was expan- sive. Synthesis, signal processing, analysis, algorithmic composition, psychoacous- tics—all were within his scope and all were expressed and described in great detail in his famous article [1] and the succession of programs MUSIC I-V.1 It is in the nature of the computer medium that detail be elevated at times to the forefront of our thinking, for unlike preceding music technologies, both acoustic and analogue, computers require us to manage detail to accomplish even the most basic steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastman Computer Music Center (ECMC)
    Upcoming ECMC25 Concerts Thursday, March 22 Music of Mario Davidovsky, JoAnn Kuchera-Morin, Allan Schindler, and ECMC composers 8:00 pm, Memorial Art Gallery, 500 University Avenue Saturday, April 14 Contemporary Organ Music Festival with the Eastman Organ Department & College Music Department Steve Everett, Ron Nagorcka, and René Uijlenhoet, guest composers 5:00 p.m. + 7:15 p.m., Interfaith Chapel, University of Rochester Eastman Computer Wednesday, May 2 Music Cente r (ECMC) New carillon works by David Wessel and Stephen Rush th with the College Music Department 25 Anniversa ry Series 12:00 pm, Eastman Quadrangle (outdoor venue), University of Rochester admission to all concerts is free Curtis Roads & Craig Harris, ecmc.rochester.edu guest composers B rian O’Reilly, video artist Thursday, March 8, 2007 Kilbourn Hall fire exits are located along the right A fully accessible restroom is located on the main and left sides, and at the back of the hall. Eastman floor of the Eastman School of Music. Our ushers 8:00 p.m. Theatre fire exits are located throughout the will be happy to direct you to this facility. Theatre along the right and left sides, and at the Kilbourn Hall back of the orchestra, mezzanine, and balcony Supporting the Eastman School of Music: levels. In the event of an emergency, you will be We at the Eastman School of Music are grateful for notified by the stage manager. the generous contributions made by friends, If notified, please move in a calm and orderly parents, and alumni, as well as local and national fashion to the nearest exit.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter 264KB
    Memorial Tributes: Volume 16 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 16 MAX V. MATHEWS 1926–2011 Elected in 1979 “For contributions to computer generation and analysis of meaningful sounds.” BY C. GORDON BELL MAX VERNON MATHEWS, often called the father of computer music, died on April 21, 2011, at the age of 84. At the time of his death he was serving as professor (research) emeritus at Stanford University’s Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics. Max was born in Columbus, Nebraska, on November 13, 1926. He attended high school in Peru, Nebraska, where his father taught physics and his mother taught biology at the state teachers college there. Peru High School was the training school for the college. This was during World War II (1943– 1944). One day when Max was a senior in high school, he simply went off to Omaha (strictly on his own volition) and enlisted in the U.S. Navy—a fortunate move because he was able to have some influence on the service to which he was assigned, and after taking the Eddy Aptitude Test, he was selected for radar school. Radar, however, was so secret, that Max was designated a “radio technician.” After basic training he was sent to Treasure Island, San Francisco, where he met Marjorie (Marj), who became his wife. After returning from the war, Max applied to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). On graduating with a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Caltech in 1950, he went to MIT to earn a doctorate in 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • MTO 20.1: Willey, Editing and Arrangement
    Volume 20, Number 1, March 2014 Copyright © 2014 Society for Music Theory The Editing and Arrangement of Conlon Nancarrow’s Studies for Disklavier and Synthesizers Robert Willey NOTE: The examples for the (text-only) PDF version of this item are available online at: http://www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.14.20.1/mto.14.20.1.willey.php KEYWORDS: Conlon Nancarrow, MIDI, synthesis, Disklavier ABSTRACT: Over the last three decades a number of approaches have been used to hear Conlon Nancarrow’s Studies for Player Piano in new settings. The musical information necessary to do this can be obtained from his published scores, the punching scores that reveal the planning behind the compositions, copies of the rolls, or the punched rolls themselves. The most direct method of extending the Studies is to convert them to digital format, because of the similarities between the way notes are represented on a player piano roll and in MIDI. The process of editing and arranging Nancarrow’s Studies in the MIDI environment is explained, including how piano roll dynamics are converted into MIDI velocities, and other decisions that must be made in order to perform them in a particular environment: the Yamaha Disklavier with its accompanying GM sound module. While Nancarrow approved of multi-timbral synthesis, separating the voices of his Studies and assigning them unique timbres changes the listener’s experience of the “resultant,” Tenney’s term for the fusion of multiple voices into a single polyphonic texture. Received January 2014 1. Introduction [1.1] Conlon Nancarrow’s compositional output from 1948 until his death in 1997 was primarily for the two player pianos in his studio in Mexico City.
    [Show full text]
  • 43558913.Pdf
    ! ! ! Generative Music Composition Software Systems Using Biologically Inspired Algorithms: A Systematic Literature Review ! ! ! Master of Science Thesis in the Master Degree Programme ! !Software Engineering and Management! ! ! KEREM PARLAKGÜMÜŞ ! ! ! University of Gothenburg Chalmers University of Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering Göteborg, Sweden, January 2014 The author grants Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg the non-exclusive right to publish the work electronically and in a non-commercial purpose and to make it accessible on the Internet. The author warrants that he/she is the author of the work, and warrants that the work does not contain texts, pictures or other material that !violates copyright laws. The author shall, when transferring the rights of the work to a third party (like a publisher or a company), acknowledge the third party about this agreement. If the author has signed a copyright agreement with a third party regarding the work, the author warrants hereby that he/she has obtained any necessary permission from this third party to let Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg store the work electronically and make it accessible on the Internet. ! ! Generative Music Composition Software Systems Using Biologically Inspired Algorithms: A !Systematic Literature Review ! !KEREM PARLAKGÜMÜŞ" ! !© KEREM PARLAKGÜMÜŞ, January 2014." Examiner: LARS PARETO, MIROSLAW STARON" !Supervisor: PALLE DAHLSTEDT" University of Gothenburg" Chalmers University of Technology" Department of Computer Science and Engineering" SE-412 96 Göteborg" Sweden" !Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000" ! ! ! Department of Computer Science and Engineering" !Göteborg, Sweden, January 2014 Abstract My original contribution to knowledge is to examine existing work for methods and approaches used, main functionalities, benefits and limitations of 30 Genera- tive Music Composition Software Systems (GMCSS) by performing a systematic literature review.
    [Show full text]