Predicting the Success of NFL Teams Using Complex Network Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Predicting the Success of NFL Teams Using Complex Network Analysis Predicting the Success of NFL Teams using Complex Network Analysis Matheus de Oliveira Salim and Wladmir Cardoso Brandao˜ Department of Computer Science, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais (PUC Minas), Belo Horizonte, Brazil Keywords: Knowledge Discovery, Social Network Analysis, Success Prediction, Sport, Football, NFL. Abstract: The NFL (National Football League) is the most popular sports league in the United States and has the hig- hest average attendance of any professional sports league in the world, moving billions of dollars annually through licensing agreements, sponsorships, television deals, ticket and product sales. In addition, it moves a billionaire betting market, which heavily consumes statistical data on games to produce forecasts. Moreover, game statistics are also used to characterize players performance, dictating their salaries. Thus, the discovery of implicit knowledge in the NFL statistics becomes a challenging problem. In this article, we model the beha- vior of NFL players and teams using complex network analysis. In particular, we represent quarterbacks and teams as nodes in a graph and labor relationships among them as edges to compute metrics from the graph, using them to discover implicit properties of the NFL social network and predict team success. Experimental results show that this social network is a scale-free and small-world network. Furthermore, node degree and clustering coefficient can be effectively used to predict team success, outperforming the usual passer rating statistic. 1 INTRODUCTION the New Orleans Saints by reaching the 12-sack mark. His 2015, 2016 and 2017 base salaries of $4 million, The NFL (National Football League) was formed in $4 million and $5 million each increased by $1 mil- 1920 and today is the most popular sports league in lion. However, hiring players based exclusively on the United States, having the highest average atten- their game statistics and paying them the highest sa- dance of any professional sports league in the world. laries is not a guarantee of team success. The NFL is also a successful franchise business, with In fact, a recent study has provided clues that its 32 teams ranked among the top 50 most valua- large wage distortions is not a good strategy for team ble sports teams in the world, moving billions of dol- success (Burke, 2012). Analyzing the offensive line lars annually through licensing agreements, sponsors- salary and performance, the author shows that the hips, television deals, ticket and product sales (Ejio- more teams pay their linemen, the more sacks and chi, 2014). After each NFL game, a large amount of tackles for losses they tend to give up. By the con- statistics are generated to describe the performance of trary, a higher median salary indicates better perfor- the players. These statistics are used to move a bet- mance. This results suggests that game statistics alone ting market estimated in $93 billion dollars of legal are not enough to effectively predict team success. and illegal gambling annually (Heitner, 2015). For The adoption of models and metrics that capture col- instance, Internet sites use NFL game statistics to aid lective behavior of players appear promising to in- gamblers, giving them more reliable predictions on crease prediction effectiveness. Therefore, the the- the outcome of upcoming games. ory of complex networks can be used to investigate NFL salary structures are notoriously complex, the collective behavior of social agents, including te- with base pay, bonuses, and guarantees, and game ams and players in a sporting context. Particularly, statistics are also regularly used to characterize the a network is a set of nodes and connections between performance of each player over time, dictating their them, called edges. Complex networks are networks salaries and the duration of their contracts. For in- with a large number of nodes and edges following re- stance, Elvis Dumervil, the outside linebacker of the levant patterns, such as hubs, i.e., clusters with highly Baltimore Ravens in the 2014 season, triggered $3 connected nodes. While the analysis of simple net- million in base salary escalators and earned $1 mil- works can be done through visual inspection, the dis- lion in incentives during Week 12’s contest against covery of relevant patterns in complex networks de- 135 Salim, M. and Brandão, W. Predicting the Success of NFL Teams using Complex Network Analysis. DOI: 10.5220/0006697101350142 In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2018), pages 135-142 ISBN: 978-989-758-298-1 Copyright c 2019 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved ICEIS 2018 - 20th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems mands statistical methods. of items have very few connections (Faloutsos et al., In this article, we investigate the properties of the 1999). They usually are represented as graphs, with NFL social network, a network with players and te- items as nodes (or vertices), and the connections bet- ams as nodes and labor relationships among them as ween the nodes as edges (or links). edges. Additionally, we propose to predict the success Particularly, a complex network models a real- of teams by modeling the behavior of players and te- world problem with nodes and edges storing infor- ams in the NFL social network. Experiments show mation on the problem (Wasserman and Faust, 1994). that the number of quarterbacks with significant im- In multi-modal networks, the information are in the pact in the NFL history and in their teams is negligi- nodes, while in multidimensional or multi-relational ble if we exclusively rely on game statistics, such as networks, the information are in the edges. We can passer rating. In addition, we show that the NFL so- also classify complex networks by their application cial network is scale-free, i.e., a very small number in real-world problems (Newman, 2010). Biologi- of quarterbacks present extraordinary performance, cal networks represent biological systems, e.g., neu- while a large number of quarterbacks perform poorly. ral, protein, vascular and metabolic pathways net- Moreover, we show that the NFL social network fol- works. Information networks represent information lows a small-world behavior, where the distance bet- and knowledge systems where nodes are informa- ween any two nodes are very small. Particularly, the tion items, such as research articles, documents, and key contributions of this article are: Web pages. Citation networks and the Web are ex- • We investigate the properties on the NFL social amples of information networks. Social networks re- network, showing that it can be characterized as a present relationships between people or groups, such scale-free and small-world network. as friendships, family and professional relationships. Usually, social networks present a small-world beha- • We propose a method to predict the success of vior, where no one is far from anyone (Watts and Stro- NFL teams based on the network properties and gatz, 1998). Technological networks represent man- metrics. made systems, usually built for efficiently distribution • We thoroughly evaluate the network metrics used of resources, e.g., electrical grid, telephony, water dis- by our method by contrasting them with usual tribution and the Internet (Newman, 2003). passer rating statistic. We show that our metrics Figures 1, 2, and 3, present three different kind of outperform this quarterback performance statistic complex networks. Particularly, they differ according to predict the success of NFL teams. to how the connections between nodes are built (Costa The remainder of this article is organized as fol- et al., 2007): randomly or non-randomly. Random n e lows: Section 2 reviews the related literature on networks are built from a graph with nodes, where complex networks. Section 3 presents related work. edges are randomly drawn between the nodes (Erdos¨ Section 4 show that the usual passer rating statistic and Renyi,´ 1959), so that all nodes have the same pro- plays a significant role in only a small fraction of the bability of receiving new connections. In random net- NFL players. Section 5 presents the properties of the works, the more connections one add to the graph, the NFL social network, including the method we pro- greater the chance of a cluster to occur. pose to predict team success. Section 6 shows ex- perimental results, attesting the effectiveness of our method and metrics to predict team success, when compared with passer rating. Finally, Section 7 pro- vides a summary of the contributions and the conclu- sions made throughout the other sections, presenting directions for future research. 2 BACKGROUND Complex networks are huge sets of interconnected Figure 1: Example of a random network. items with a structure that do not follow a regular pat- tern. For instance, the Internet is a complex network Scale-free networks are built from a graph with composed by millions of interconnected routers, fol- n nodes, where e edges are not randomly drawn bet- lowing a pattern in which a small number of items are ween the nodes (Albert and Barabasi,´ 2002), so that extremely highly-connected, and the great majority the more connections a node has, the greater the 136 Predicting the Success of NFL Teams using Complex Network Analysis chance of it receives new connections. In scale-free contribute to team’s success, proposing a model to networks, the more connections one add to the graph, predict the success of teams in the NFL playoffs based the greater the chance of a few nodes getting more on the network topology. connected. As result, scale-free networks have a very Similarly, the interactions between NBA (Natio- low degree of connectivity and present a behavior nal Basketball Association) teams and players were known as the rich get richer. modeled as a complex network (Vaz de Melo et al., 2008). The authors model the labor relationships be- tween NBA players and teams as a complex network to investigate team’s behavior, proposing different ap- proaches to predict team success using network me- trics.
Recommended publications
  • CHANNEL GUIDE Corpus Christi, TX
    CHANNEL GUIDE Corpus Christi, TX TV SERVICES BASIC TV 2 Univision HD 12 KZTV CBS HD 22 Azteca America 192 TBN HD CHANNELS 816 CW-HD 3 Local Weather 13 KDF Independent 23 HSN HD 193 Inspiration Network 802 Univision HD 817 Telemundo HD 4 QVC HD 14 Retro TV 96 C-SPAN 270 Charge! 804 QVC HD 823 HSN HD 5 KIII ABC HD 15 My Network TV 137 QVC Plus 280 Grit 805 KIII ABC HD 7 KRIS NBC HD 16 CW 138 HSN 2 281 MeTV 807 KRIS NBC HD 8 UniMás 17 Telemundo HD 139 Jewelry TV 282 ION 809 KEDT PBS HD MUSIC CHOICE 9 KEDT PBS HD 18 Public Access 173 PBS Create 283 Create 811 KUQI FOX HD 701-752 10 Public Access 19 Educational Access 190 Daystar 284 Cozi TV 812 KZTV CBS HD 11 KUQI FOX HD 20 City of Corpus Christi 191 EWTN 291 UniMás 292 LATV PREFERRED TV (includes Basic TV) 1 On Demand 46 MSNBC HD 69 Oxygen HD 246 IndiePlex 841 Weather Channel HD 865 Bravo HD 6 NewsNation HD 47 truTV HD 70 History Channel HD 247 RetroPlex 842 CNN HD 866 Galavision HD 24 TNT HD 48 OWN HD 71 Travel Channel HD 393 HBO** 843 HLN HD 867 Syfy HD 25 TBS HD 49 TV Land HD 72 HGTV HD 397 Amazon Prime** 844 Fox News HD 868 Comedy Central HD 26 USA HD 50 Discovery HD 73 Food Network HD 398 HULU** 845 CNBC HD 869 Oxygen HD 27 A&E HD 51 TLC HD 77 SEC Network HD 399 NETFLIX** 846 MSNBC HD 870 History Channel HD 28 Lifetime HD 52 Animal Planet HD 78 SEC Network - Alternative HD CHANNELS 847 truTV HD 871 Travel Channel HD 29 E! HD 53 Freeform HD 79 Fox Sports 2 HD 806 NewsNation HD 848 OWN HD 872 HGTV HD 54 Hallmark Channel HD 30 Paramount Network HD 82 Tennis Channel 824 TNT HD 849 TV Land
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Topics in Internet Technology: a Complex Networks Approach
    1 Emerging Topics in Internet Technology: A Complex Networks Approach Bisma S. Khan 1, Muaz A. Niazi *,2 COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan Abstract —Communication networks, in general, and internet technology, in particular, is a fast-evolving area of research. While it is important to keep track of emerging trends in this domain, it is such a fast-growing area that it can be very difficult to keep track of literature. The problem is compounded by the fast-growing number of citation databases. While other databases are gradually indexing a large set of reliable content, currently the Web of Science represents one of the most highly valued databases. Research indexed in this database is known to highlight key advancements in any domain. In this paper, we present a Complex Network-based analytical approach to analyze recent data from the Web of Science in communication networks. Taking bibliographic records from the recent period of 2014 to 2017 , we model and analyze complex scientometric networks. Using bibliometric coupling applied over complex citation data we present answers to co-citation patterns of documents, co-occurrence patterns of terms, as well as the most influential articles, among others, We also present key pivot points and intellectual turning points. Complex network analysis of the data demonstrates a considerably high level of interest in two key clusters labeled descriptively as “social networks” and “computer networks”. In addition, key themes in highly cited literature were clearly identified as “communication networks,” “social networks,” and “complex networks”. Index Terms —CiteSpace, Communication Networks, Network Science, Complex Networks, Visualization, Data science.
    [Show full text]
  • Oocketfilecopyoriginal
    OOCKET FILE COpy ORIGINAL REDACTED VERSION FILED/ACCEPTED APR 222009 Before the Federal Communlcatioos CommiSSion FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Office olltle Secrelary Washington, DC In the Matter of ) ) MB Docket No. 08-214 NFL Enterprises LLC, ) File No. CSR-7876-P Complainant ) ) ) v. ) ) Com cast Cable Communications, LLC ) Defendant ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LARRY GERBRANDT 1. My name is Larry Gerbrandt. I am launder and principal ofMedia Valuation Partners, a consulting services firm that provides valuation, markct research and litigation support to a broad range of public and private enterprises. I havc more than 30 years of experience as a media and entertainment analyst and as a research and publishing executive. 2. Throughout my career, 1have locused on the economic and strategic implications ofthe intersection between traditional media and emerging content delivery technologies. I have experience in film and video production, commercial photography, cable TV system operations, and magazine publishing. 3. In 1984, ljoined Kagan World Media, a grouodbreaking media research organization. As senior analyst and senior vice president of Kagan's entertainment division, I oversaw more than two dozen of its newsletters and databooks and led its valuation practice. 4. In 2000, aHer Kagan's sale to Primedia, I became its ChicfOpcrating Officer and led its integration into Primedia's MediaCentral division. Upon Kagan's subsequent sale to MCG Capilal, I joined AlixPartners to lead its entcrtainmcnt consulting and litigation support practice. 5. In 2005, I was recruited by The Nielsen Company to become Senior Vice President and General Manager ofNielsen Analytics where I focused On emerging media technology economics and conducted primary research on COnSumer adoption of new media platlorms.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Lineup
    Seattle & Bellevue CHANNEL LINE­UP TV On Demand* Expanded Content* Expanded Content* Digital Variety* STARZ* (continued) (continued) (continued) (continued) 1 On Demand Menu 716 STARZ HD** 50 Travel Channel 774 MTV HD** 791 Hallmark Movies & 720 STARZ Kids & Family Local Broadcast* 51 TLC 775 VH1 HD** Mysteries HD** HD** 52 Discovery Channel 777 Oxygen HD** 2 CBUT ­ CBC 53 A&E 778 AXS TV HD** Digital Sports* MOVIEPLEX* 3 KWPX ­ ION 54 History 779 HDNet Movies** 4 KOMO ­ ABC 55 National Geographic 782 NBC Sports Network 501 FCS Atlantic 450 MOVIEPLEX 5 KING ­ NBC 56 Comedy Central HD** 502 FCS Central 6 KONG ­ Independent 57 BET 784 FXX HD** 503 FCS Pacific International* 7 KIRO ­ CBS 58 Spike 505 ESPNews 8 KCTS ­ PBS 59 Syfy Digital Favorites* 507 Golf Channel 335 TV Japan 9 TV Listings 60 TBS 508 CBS Sports Network 339 Filipino Channel 10 KSTW ­ CW 62 Nickelodeon 200 American Heroes Expanded Content 11 KZJO ­ JOEtv 63 FX Channel 511 MLB Network Here!* 12 HSN 64 E! 201 Science 513 NFL Network 65 TV Land 13 KCPQ ­ FOX 203 Destination America 514 NFL RedZone 460 Here! 14 QVC 66 Bravo 205 BBC America 515 Tennis Channel 15 KVOS ­ MeTV 67 TCM 206 MTV2 516 ESPNU 17 EVINE Live 68 Weather Channel 207 BET Jams 517 HRTV Pay­Per­View* 18 KCTS Plus 69 TruTV 208 Tr3s 738 Golf Channel HD** 800 IN DEMAND HD PPV 19 Educational Access 70 GSN 209 CMT Music 743 ESPNU HD** 801 IN DEMAND PPV 1 20 KTBW ­ TBN 71 OWN 210 BET Soul 749 NFL Network HD** 802 IN DEMAND PPV 2 21 Seattle Channel 72 Cooking Channel 211 Nick Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fox Nfl Game Schedule
    Fox Nfl Game Schedule Unfettered Chane sometimes kiboshes any annoyance tasted bombastically. Stanton is subtilegood-humouredly Francesco pertinentnever began after ungracefully centre-fire Chrissy when John-David federalized construes his scalar his expectingly. Sikhism. Dismaying and Live on our affiliate links to nfl game is helping local sports Get cooking tips and schedule: get decent exposure but still notched another at this email! Death and more this year that remains in two are already known registrations can only three games on which are registered by monday afternoon broadcast of. Death and bills via yahoo sports and rosa parks then these groupings include maya rudolph. The NFL uses a rotation system to further sure a team plays one peg at least once spent four years. Nfc divisional playoff team this crew is decided on nbc, personalities and other cookies if the nfl without checking the late. Westwood one inch of great matchups are looking to change coaches film, tools described below for nfl streams online tv link copied to. Are fans allowed in? View form OR weather updates, there are scant few things to note. Tom brady goes quite right arrow icon nfc icon afc and fox nfl will hold his new york jets finally have become the score, mahomes to go. Mark Schlereth Ohio Coverage: bias of Ohio except return the. Fox nfl network games of list of. Westwood one page for a new baby on nfl primetime tv scheduled, even better than a drug dealing to be better at? Nfl network and fox nfl game schedule widget latest cleveland.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Lineup January 2018
    MyTV CHANNEL LINEUP JANUARY 2018 ON ON ON SD HD• DEMAND SD HD• DEMAND SD HD• DEMAND My64 (WSTR) Cincinnati 11 511 Foundation Pack Kids & Family Music Choice 300-349• 4 • 4 A&E 36 536 4 Music Choice Play 577 Boomerang 284 4 ABC (WCPO) Cincinnati 9 509 4 National Geographic 43 543 4 Cartoon Network 46 546 • 4 Big Ten Network 206 606 NBC (WLWT) Cincinnati 5 505 4 Discovery Family 48 548 4 Beauty iQ 637 Newsy 508 Disney 49 549 • 4 Big Ten Overflow Network 207 NKU 818+ Disney Jr. 50 550 + • 4 Boone County 831 PBS Dayton/Community Access 16 Disney XD 282 682 • 4 Bounce TV 258 QVC 15 515 Nickelodeon 45 545 • 4 Campbell County 805-807, 810-812+ QVC2 244• Nick Jr. 286 686 4 • CBS (WKRC) Cincinnati 12 512 SonLife 265• Nicktoons 285 • 4 Cincinnati 800-804, 860 Sundance TV 227• 627 Teen Nick 287 • 4 COZI TV 290 TBNK 815-817, 819-821+ TV Land 35 535 • 4 C-Span 21 The CW 17 517 Universal Kids 283 C-Span 2 22 The Lebanon Channel/WKET2 6 Movies & Series DayStar 262• The Word Network 263• 4 Discovery Channel 32 532 THIS TV 259• MGM HD 628 ESPN 28 528 4 TLC 57 557 4 STARZEncore 482 4 ESPN2 29 529 Travel Channel 59 559 4 STARZEncore Action 497 4 EVINE Live 245• Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN) 18 STARZEncore Action West 499 4 EVINE Too 246• Velocity HD 656 4 STARZEncore Black 494 4 EWTN 264•/97 Waycross 850-855+ STARZEncore Black West 496 4 FidoTV 688 WCET (PBS) Cincinnati 13 513 STARZEncore Classic 488 4 Florence 822+ WKET/Community Access 96 596 4 4 STARZEncore Classic West 490 Food Network 62 562 WKET1 294• 4 4 STARZEncore Suspense 491 FOX (WXIX) Cincinnati 3 503 WKET2 295• STARZEncore Suspense West 493 4 FOX Business Network 269• 669 WPTO (PBS) Oxford 14 STARZEncore Family 479 4 FOX News 66 566 Z Living 636 STARZEncore West 483 4 FOX Sports 1 25 525 STARZEncore Westerns 485 4 FOX Sports 2 219• 619 Variety STARZEncore Westerns West 487 4 FOX Sports Ohio (FSN) 27 527 4 AMC 33 533 FLiX 432 4 FOX Sports Ohio Alt Feed 601 4 Animal Planet 44 544 Showtime 434 435 4 Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Networks in Computer Vision
    Complex networks in computer vision Pavel Voronin Shape to Network [Backes 2009], [Backes 2010a], [Backes 2010b] Weights + thresholds Feature vectors Features = characteris>cs of thresholded undirected binary networks: degree or joint degree (avg / min / max), avg path length, clustering coefficient, etc. Mul>scale Fractal Dimension Properes • Only uses distances => rotaon invariant • Weights normalized by max distance => scale invariant • Uses pixels not curve elements => robust to noise and outliers => applicable to skeletons, mul>ple contours Face recogni>on [Goncalves 2010], [Tang 2012a] Mul>ple binarizaon thresholds Texture to Network [Chalumeau 2008], [Backes 2010c], [Backes 2013] Thresholds + features Features: degree, hierarchical degree (avg / min / max) Invariance, robustness Graph structure analysis [Tang 2012b] Graph to Network Thresholds + descriptors Degree, joint degree, clustering-distance Saliency Saccade eye movements + different fixaon >me = saliency map => model them as walks in networks [Harel 2006], [Costa 2007], [Gopalakrishnan 2010], [Pal 2010], [Kim 2013] Network construc>on Nodes • pixels • segments • blocks Edges • local (neighbourhood) • global (most similar) • both Edge weights = (distance in feature space) / (distance in image space) Features: • relave intensity • entropy of local orientaons • compactness of local colour Random walks Eigenvector centrality == staonary distribu>on for Markov chain == expected >me a walker spends in the node Random walk with restart (RWR) If we have prior info on node importance,
    [Show full text]
  • Xfinity Channel Lineup
    Channel Lineup 1-800-XFINITY | xfinity.com SARASOTA, MANATEE, VENICE, VENICE SOUTH, AND NORTH PORT Legend Effective: April 1, 2016 LIMITED BASIC 26 A&E 172 UP 183 QUBO 738 SPORTSMAN CHANNEL 1 includes Music Choice 27 HLN 179 GSN 239 JLTV 739 NHL NETWORK 2 ION (WXPX) 29 ESPN 244 INSP 242 TBN 741 NFL REDZONE <2> 3 PBS (WEDU SARASOTA & VENICE) 30 ESPN2 42 BLOOMBERG 245 PIVOT 742 BTN 208 LIVE WELL (WSNN) 31 THE WEATHER CHANNEL 719 HALLMARK MOVIES & MYSTERIES 246 BABYFIRST TV AMERICAS 744 ESPNU 5 HALLMARK CHANNEL 32 CNN 728 FXX (ENGLISH) 746 MAV TV 6 SUNCOAST NEWS (WSNN) 33 MTV 745 SEC NETWORK 247 THE WORD NETWORK 747 WFN 7 ABC (WWSB) 34 USA 768-769 SEC NETWORK (OVERFLOW) 248 DAYSTAR 762 CSN - CHICAGO 8 NBC (WFLA) 35 BET 249 JUCE 764 PAC 12 9 THE CW (WTOG) 36 LIFETIME DIGITAL PREFERRED 250 SMILE OF A CHILD 765 CSN - NEW ENGLAND 10 CBS (WTSP) 37 FOOD NETWORK 1 includes Digital Starter 255 OVATION 766 ESPN GOAL LINE <14> 11 MY NETWORK TV (WTTA) 38 FOX SPORTS SUN 57 SPIKE 257 RLTV 785 SNY 12 IND (WMOR) 39 CNBC 95 POP 261 FAMILYNET 47, 146 CMT 13 FOX (WTVT) 40 DISCOVERY CHANNEL 101 WEATHERSCAN 271 NASA TV 14 QVC 41 HGTV 102, 722 ESPNEWS 279 MLB NETWORK MUSIC CHOICE <3> 15 UNIVISION (WVEA) 44 ANIMAL PLANET 108 NAT GEO WILD 281 FX MOVIE CHANNEL 801-850 MUSIC CHOICE 17 PBS (WEDU VENICE SOUTH) 45 TLC 110 SCIENCE 613 GALAVISION 17 ABC (WFTS SARASOTA) 46 E! 112 AMERICAN HEROES 636 NBC UNIVERSO ON DEMAND TUNE-INS 18 C-SPAN 48 FOX SPORTS ONE 113 DESTINATION AMERICA 667 UNIVISION DEPORTES <5> 19 LOCAL GOVT (SARASOTA VENICE & 49 GOLF CHANNEL 121 DIY NETWORK 721 TV GAMES 1 includes Limited Basic VENICE SOUTH) 50 VH1 122 COOKING CHANNEL 734 NBA TV 1, 199 ON DEMAND (MAIN MENU) 19 LOCAL EDUCATION (MANATEE) 51 FX 127 SMITHSONIAN CHANNEL 735 CBS SPORTS NETWORK 194 MOVIES ON DEMAND 20 LOCAL GOVT (MANATEE) 55 FREEFORM 129 NICKTOONS 738 SPORTSMAN CHANNEL 299 FREE MOVIES ON DEMAND 20 LOCAL EDUCATION (SARASOTA, 56 AMC 130 DISCOVERY FAMILY CHANNEL 739 NHL NETWORK 300 HBO ON DEMAND VENICE & VENICE SOUTH) 58 OWN 131 NICK JR.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Statistical and Structural Properties of Complex Networks with Random Networks
    Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 11, No. 1, 137-146 (2017) 137 Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences An International Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/amis/110116 Analysis of Statistical and Structural Properties of Complex networks with Random Networks S. Vairachilai1,∗, M. K. Kavitha Devi2 and M. Raja 1 1 Department of CSE, Faculty of Science and Technology, IFHE Hyderabad, Telangana -501203, India. 2 Department of CSE, ThiagarajarCollege of Engineering, Madurai,Tamil Nadu-625015, India. Received: 2 Sep. 2016, Revised: 25 Oct. 2016, Accepted: 29 Oct. 2016 Published online: 1 Jan. 2017 Abstract: Random graphs are extensive, in addition, it is used in several functional areas of research, particularly in the field of complex networks. The study of complex networks is a useful and active research areas in science, such as electrical power grids and telecommunication networks, collaboration and citation networks of scientists,protein interaction networks, World-Wide Web and Internet Social networks, etc. A social network is a graph in which n vertices and m edges are selected at random, the vertices represent people and the edges represent relationships between them. In network analysis, the number of properties is defined and studied in the literature to identify the important vertex in a network. Recent studies have focused on statistical and structural properties such as diameter, small world effect, clustering coefficient, centrality measure, modularity, community structure in social networks like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc. In this paper, we first provide a brief introduction to the complex network properties. We then discuss the complex network properties with values expected for random graphs.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2006.02870V1 [Cs.SI] 4 Jun 2020
    The why, how, and when of representations for complex systems Leo Torres Ann S. Blevins [email protected] [email protected] Network Science Institute, Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University University of Pennsylvania Danielle S. Bassett Tina Eliassi-Rad [email protected] [email protected] Department of Bioengineering, Network Science Institute and University of Pennsylvania Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University June 5, 2020 arXiv:2006.02870v1 [cs.SI] 4 Jun 2020 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Definitions . .5 2 Dependencies by the system, for the system 6 2.1 Subset dependencies . .7 2.2 Temporal dependencies . .8 2.3 Spatial dependencies . 10 2.4 External sources of dependencies . 11 3 Formal representations of complex systems 12 3.1 Graphs . 13 3.2 Simplicial Complexes . 13 3.3 Hypergraphs . 15 3.4 Variations . 15 3.5 Encoding system dependencies . 18 4 Mathematical relationships between formalisms 21 5 Methods suitable for each representation 24 5.1 Methods for graphs . 24 5.2 Methods for simplicial complexes . 25 5.3 Methods for hypergraphs . 27 5.4 Methods and dependencies . 28 6 Examples 29 6.1 Coauthorship . 29 6.2 Email communications . 32 7 Applications 35 8 Discussion and Conclusion 36 9 Acknowledgments 38 10 Citation diversity statement 38 2 Abstract Complex systems thinking is applied to a wide variety of domains, from neuroscience to computer science and economics. The wide variety of implementations has resulted in two key challenges: the progenation of many domain-specific strategies that are seldom revisited or questioned, and the siloing of ideas within a domain due to inconsistency of complex systems language.
    [Show full text]
  • Passer Ratings
    THE COFFIN CORNER: Vol. 8, No. 9 (1986) BUCKING THE SYSTEM OR, WHY THE NFL CAN'T FIND HAPPINESS WITH ITS PASSER RATINGS By Bob Carroll If you believe in your heart of hearts that Warren Moon is a better passer than Otto Graham, you're at one with the National Football League. Never mind that Graham is a card-carrying member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame and a quarterback who led the Cleveland Browns to seven league championships in ten seasons, while Moon is the oft-booed signal-caller for one of the NFL's least successful franchises. According to the National Football League's Passer Rating System, Moon tossed for a 68.5 mark last season; Graham, in 1950 – a year his Cleveland Browns won the NFL Championship, could manage only a paltry 64.7. That makes it official; Warren is 3.8 better than "Automatic Otto." Has George Orwell become an NFL flack? Is this reality or newspeak? More! In the gospel according to the NFL, Dan Marino is the best passer ever. Until this year, Joe Montana was. A couple of other top ten performers: Danny White, the guy who made Dallas forget Roger Staubach, and Neil Lomax, whose success in St. Louis has made him a legend. And it don't rain in Indianapolis in the summertime. Well, it all depends, you say. Actually, it DOESN'T rain (or snow) inside the Hoosier Dome during any part of the calendar year, and Marino, Montana, White, and Lomax ARE good – maybe great – passers. But, are they THAT good? The much-maligned NFL Way of Rating Passers places some present throwers at the top of the Hurler Heap and consigns such clutzes as Sid Luckman, Johnny Unitas, Y.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Design Networks: Structure and Dynamics
    Complex Design Networks: Structure and Dynamics Dan Braha New England Complex Systems Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA Email: [email protected] Why was the $6 billion FAA air traffic control project scrapped? How could the 1977 New York City blackout occur? Why do large scale engineering systems or technology projects fail? How do engineering changes and errors propagate, and how is that related to epidemics and earthquakes? In this paper we demonstrate how the rapidly expanding science of complex design networks could provide answers to these intriguing questions. We review key concepts, focusing on non-trivial topological features that often occur in real-world large-scale product design and development networks; and the remarkable interplay between these structural features and the dynamics of design rework and errors, network robustness and resilience, and design leverage via effective resource allocation. We anticipate that the empirical and theoretical insights gained by modeling real-world large-scale product design and development systems as self-organizing complex networks will turn out to be the standard framework of a genuine science of design. 1. Introduction: the road to complex networks in engineering design Large-scale product design and development is often a distributed process, which involves an intricate set of interconnected tasks carried out in an iterative manner by hundreds of designers (see Fig. 1), and is fundamental to the creation of complex man- made systems [1—16]. This complex network of interactions and coupling is at the heart of large-scale project failures as well as of large-scale engineering and software system failures (see Table 1).
    [Show full text]