(Bill Ins) 24-OV During PO 99204 25 57 Extend

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Bill Ins) 24-OV During PO 99204 25 57 Extend RIT START: RIT DONE: ARRIVED: DESK UP: WORK-UP START: WORK-UP DONE: □ DILATE □ TEACH TIME DR EXAM START: CK-OUT: CPT (PROCEDURE) CODES NEW E&M OV-no ov in 3yrs MISCELLANEOUS CONTACT LENS SERVICES (INS) MODIFIERS 99205 25 57 Advanced NC No Charge 92311 Fit, Aphakia one eye (Bill Ins) 24-OV during PO 99204 25 57 Extend PO Post-op 92312 Fit, Aphakia both eyes (Bill Ins) 25-OV/SX same day (0-10 PO) 99203 25 57 Interm 99050 After Hrs | 99051 Wknd/Hol CONTACT LENS APHAKIC PRODUCT 50-Bilateral sx (qty 1, dbl price) 99202 25 57 Brief OFFICE VISITS - PT PAY V2500 $ (lens) Aphakic Soft Daily Wear 51-Multi sx(topline) NEW EYE (" "3yrs) NPC New - Extend V2513 $ (lens) Aphakic Gas Perm EW 57-Ov/sx same day (90 PO) 92004 25 57 Extend NPI New - Interm V2599 $ (lens) Bandage CL 79-Sx not related 92002 25 57 Brief NPB New - Brief ESTABLISHED E&M OV EPC Est - Extend PROCEDURES SUPPLIES, OTHER 99215 25 57 Advanced EPI Est - Interm 67820C RT LT 79 Epilation-per eye *Provider, POS = ABO; Location = Clinic 99214 24 25 57 Extend EPB Est - Brief 68810C RT LT 79 Probing of NLD PATCH (cloth-indiv) PT PAY 99213 24 25 57 Interm EPO Est - OVO 65205C RT LT 79 FB Conj, superficial PATCHB (adh-box) PT PAY 99212 24 25 57 Brief TESTS 65210C RT LT 79 FB Conj, embedded V2718 (Fresnell Pr) PT PAY 99211 24 25 57 OVO 92015 Refraction 65222C RT LT 79 FB Cornea WITH SL Provider, POS, Location = ABO ESTABLISHED EYE OV 92015P " " Pt Pay 65220C RT LT 79 FB Cornea w/OUT SL MEDREC (Medical Records) See List for $ 92014 25 57 Extend 92060 Sensorimotor 92012 25 57 Brief 92060F " " DETROIT 92225 EO-Init RT LT EYES: 1 = RIGHT EYE 2 = LEFT EYE 3 = BOTH EYES | A = INITIAL ENCOUNTER D = SUBSEQUENT S = SEQUELA | LIDS: 1 = RUL 2 = RLL 4 = LUL 5 = LLL CONJUNCTIVA/SCLERA GLAUCOMA LIDS/LACRIMAL/ORBIT MUSCLES/MOVEMENTS/BINOCULAR VA + 1X 2X LIDS: 1 = RUL 2 = RLL 4 = LUL 5 = LLL S05.0 Abrasion + A D S EYES: 1 = RIGHT 2 = LEFT 3 = BOTH H52.53 + 1 2 3 Accomodative spasm H10.53 + 1 2 3 Bleph'conjunctivitis, contact Q15.0 Congenital, Infant/Juvenille H01.02 + 1 2 4 5 Blepharitis, squamous H53.01 + 1 2 3 Amblyopia, deprivation H10.45 Conjunctivitis, allergic H40.01 + 1 2 3 Open angle, borderline H01.01 + 1 2 4 5 Blepharitis, ulcerative H53.02 + 1 2 3 Amblyopia, refractive H10.1 + 1 2 3 " " , atopic H40.05 + 1 2 3 Ocular hypertension G24.5 Blepharospasm H53.03 + 1 2 3 Amblyopia, strabismic B30.1 " " , due to Adenovirus H40.00 + 1 2 3 Suspect, Glaucoma H02.52 + 1 2 4 5 Blepharosphimosis H53.04 + 1 2 3 Amblyopia, suspect H10.01 + 1 2 3 " " , follicular, acute Stage: 1=Mild,2=Mod,3=Severe,4=Indeterm H00.03 + 1 2 4 5 Cellulitis/Absess, lid H50.61 + 1 2 Brown's syndrome H10.43 + 1 2 3 " " , follicular, chronic + 1 2 3 H05.01 + 1 2 3 Cellulitis, orbit H40.11 Primary/Chronic, Open ang H10.41 + 1 2 3 " " , GPC + 1 2 3 4 H00.1 + 1 2 4 5 Chalazion B00.53 " " , Herpesviral + 1X 2X 3X + 1X 2X H51.11 Convergence insufficiency H40.3 Secondary, eye trauma S00.1 Contusion, lid (ecchymosis) H10.02 + 1 2 3 " " , mucopurulent + 1 2 3 4 + A D S H53.2 Diplopia P39.1 " " , neonatal + 1X 2X 3X + 1X 2X Contusion, orbital tissue or H51.8 Divergence insufficiency H40.4 Secondary, inflammation S05.1 H10.42 + 1 2 3 " " , simple chronic + 1 2 3 4 + A D S globe H50.81 + 1 2 Duane's syndrome H10.21 + 1 2 3 " " , toxic + 1X 2X 3X H04.43 + 1 2 3 Dacryocele H51.8 DVD/DHD, other binocular H40.5 Secondary, other eye dz H10.44 " " , vernal (no cornea invol) + 1 2 3 4 H04.32 + 1 2 3 Dacryocystitis, acute H50.51 Esophoria H15.11 + 1 2 3 Episcleritis IRIS/PUPIL/ANT CHAM L20.89 Dermatitis, atopic (other) H50.43 Esotropia, ACCOMODATIVE + 1X 2X Q13.1 Aniridia Q10.1 Ectropion, congenital T15.1 Foreign body + A D S H57.02 Anisocoria H02.12 + 1 2 4 5 Ectropion, mechanical H50.05 Esotropia, ALTERNATING H11.3 + 1 2 3 Hemorrhage Q13.0 Coloboma, iris Q10.2 Entropion, congenital H50.06 " ", A Pattern + 1X 2X Q13.2 Congenital malform, iris H02.02 + 1 2 4 5 Entropion, mechanical H50.07 " ", V Pattern S05.3 Laceration + A D S H21.32 + 1 2 3 Cyst, iris and/or ant chamb H04.21 + 1 2 3 Epiphora, excess lacrimation H50.32 " ", Intermittent D31.0 + 1 2 Neoplasm/Dermoid/Nevus H21.23 + 1 2 3 Heterochromia H04.22 + 1 2 3 Epiphora, insufficient drainage H50.01 + 1 2 Esotropia, MONOCULAR H11.13 + 1 2 3 Pigmentation H21.0 + 1 2 3 Hyphema + 1 2 H50.02 + 1 2 " ", A Pattern S02.3XX Fracture, orbital floor H15.01 + 1 2 3 Scleritis, anterior + 1X 2X + A B D G K S H50.03 + 1 2 " ", V Pattern S05.1 Hyphema, traumatic H15.03 + 1 2 3 Scleritis, posterior + A D S Initial: A = Closed, B = Open | S = SequelaH50.31 + 1 2 " ", Intermittent H20.05 + 1 2 3 Hypopyon Subsequent: D = Healing, G = Delayed healing, K = nonunionH50.52 Exophoria CORNEA H20.01 + 1 2 3 Iritis/Uveitis, primary D18.01 Hemangioma, skin/subcutan H50.15 Exotropia, ALTERNATING + 1X 2X H20.1 + 1 2 3 " ", Chronic D18.09 Hemangioma, other H50.16 " ", A Pattern S05.0 Abrasion + A D S H44.11 + 1 2 3 " ", Panuveitis H00.01 + 1 2 4 5 Hordeolum, externum H50.17 " ", V Pattern H18.82 + 1 2 3 Disorder from CLs H30.2 + 1 2 3 " ", Posterior cyclitis H00.02 + 1 2 4 5 Hordeolum, internum H50.34 " ", Intermittent H16.22 + 1 2 3 Dry Eye Syndrome, Sicca H20.03 + 1 2 3 " ", Secondary, infectious B00.59 HSV, dermatitis only H18.59 Dystrophy, hereditary H20.04 + 1 2 3 " ", Secondary, non-infect S01.11 + 1 2 Laceration, lid H18.23 + 1 2 3 Edema, secondary H44.13 + 1 2 3 " ", Sympathetic + A D S H50.11 + 1 2 Exotropia, MONOCULAR H18.21 + 1 2 3 Edema, secondary to CL H44.53 + 1 2 3 Leukocoria Q11.2 Microphthalmos H50.12 + 1 2 " ", A Pattern + 1X 2X Q07.8 Marcus-Gunn pupil B08.1 Molloscum contagiosum H50.13 + 1 2 " ", V Pattern T15.0 Foreign body + A D S H21.4 + 1 2 3 Membrane, pupillary D23.1 + 1 2 Neoplasm/Dermoid, lid H50.33 + 1 2 " ", Intermittent B00.52 Keratitis-HSV-dendritic H57.04 Mydriasis D31.6 + 1 2 Neoplasm/Dermoid, orbit H50.2 + 1 2 Hypertropia, vertical H16.14 + 1 2 3 Keratitis, punctate D31.4 + 1 2 Nevus, iris H04.55 + 1 2 3 NLDO, acquired/stenosis H55.01 Nystagmus, congenital LENS Q10.5 NLDO, congenital H55.02 Nystagmus, latent H18.42 + 1 2 3 Keratopathy, band H27.0 + 1 2 3 Aphakia H55.03 Nystagmus, visual deprivation H59.01 + 1 2 3 Keratopathy, bullous aphakic H27.11 + 1 2 3 Dislocated/Subluxation lens Q10.0 Ptosis, congenital H49.0 + 1 2 3 Palsy, 3rd nerve H16.29 + 1 2 3 Keratoconjunctivitis, other Z96.1 Pseudophakia H02.41 + 1 2 3 Ptosis, mechanical H49.1 + 1 2 3 Palsy, 4th nerve H16.25 + 1 2 3 " ", phlyctenular H26.49 + 1 2 3 Secondary cataract H02.42 + 1 2 3 Ptosis, myogenic H49.2 + 1 2 3 Palsy, 6th nerve D31.1 + 1 2 Neoplasm/Dermoid/Nevus H26.13 + 1 2 3 Total traumatic cataract H02.43 + 1 2 3 Ptosis, paralytic G51.0 Palsy, 7th (Bell's) H17.1 + 1 2 3 Opacity, central Juvenille/Infantile Cataracts H49.3 + 1 2 3 Palsy, Total H17.82 + 1 2 3 Opacity, peripheral H26.06 + 1 2 3 Combined Forms H49.81 + 1 2 3 Palsy, Kearns-Sayre H16.01 + 1 2 3 Ulcer, central H26.01 + 1 2 3 Cortical/Lamellar/Zonular H02.05 + 1 2 4 5 Trichiasis without entropion Q10.3 Pseudostrabismus H16.04 + 1 2 3 Ulcer marginal H26.03 + 1 2 3 Nuclear B07.8 Viral warts, unspecified PAYMENT: □ CASH H26.04 + 1 2 3 Subcapsular polar, anterior $ □ CHARGE H26.05 + 1 2 3 Subcapsular polar, posterior □ CHECK □ DICTATED: □ SAVE CHART □ SCHED SX: EYES: 1 = RIGHT EYE 2 = LEFT EYE 3 = BOTH EYES | A = INITIAL ENCOUNTER D = SUBSEQUENT S = SEQUELA RESEARCH/STUDIES NEURO/OPTIC NERVE HIGH RISK MEDS SYSTEMIC Q07.8 Anomaly, optic nerve Z79.2 Long term (current) use, antibiotics If this is your only diagnosis, must use H47.21 + 1 2 3 Atrophy, optic (primary) Z79.52 " ", systemic steroids only the E&M codes (don't use Eye Codes) H47.09 + 1 2 3 Asymetry, optic nerve Z79.899 " ", drug therapy F90.9 ADD/ADHD H47.31 + 1 2 3 Coloboma, optic disc *If applicable, also code any therapeutic drug E70.310 Albinism, X-linked Z51.81 H47.32 + 1 2 3 Drusen, optic nerve level monitoring. E70.311 " ", autosomal recessive D33.3 Glioma, optic nerve MISCELLANEOUS E70.318 " ", other G90.2 Horner's Syndrome T74.4XX + A D S Abuse, Shaken Baby F84.0 Autism disorder H47.03 + 1 2 3 Hypoplasia, optic nerve T76.12X + A D S Abuse, suspected L81.3 Café au lait spot G70.00 Myasthenia Gravis, w/o exac Z04.72 Abuse, suspected (ruled-out) G80.9 Cerebral Palsy G70.01 Myasthenia Gravis, w/ exac H54.0 Blindness, both eyes G93.5 Chiari malformation D33.3 Neoplasm, optic nerve H54.11 Blind RT, Low-va LT Q87.0 Craniofacial, Apert/Goldenhar/Moebius D35.2 Neoplasm, pituitary gland H54.12 Blind LT, Low-va RT Q75.1 Craniofacial, Crouzon H46.0 + 1 2 3 Neuritis, optic (papillitis) H54.41 Blind RT, WNL LT Q75.4 Craniofacial, Treacher Collins H46.1 + 1 2 3 Neuritis, optic retrobulbar H54.42 Blind LT, WNL RT Q75.0 Craniofacial, stenosis H47.01 + 1 2 3 Neuropathy, ischemic optic H47.61 + 1 2 Blindness, cortical H90.5 Deafness, sensorineural H47.11 Papilledema, high ICP H44.52 + 1 2 3 Blindness, hypotensive eye R62.50 Developmentally Delayed G93.2 Pseudotumor cerebri + 1X 2X E10.9 Diabetes, Type I (w/o complication) S05.1 Contusion, eye R29.891 Torticollis, ocular + A D S E11.9 Diabetes, Type II (w/o complication) RETINA/VITREOUS H53.45 + 1 2 3 Defect, visual field (peripheral) Z79.4 Diabetes, Insulin Dependent Q14.8 Coloboma, retina H53.53 Deficit, color (deuteranomaly) Q75.1 Dysostosis, craniofacial H35.41 + 1 2 3 Degeneration, retina (lattice) H53.8 Disturbance, blurred vision Q90.0 Down's Syndrome H44.2 + 1 2 3 Degenerative, myopia (malig) H53.16 Disturbance, psychophysical R48.0 Dyslexia H33.01 + 1 2 3 Detachment, retina (single) H53.19 Disturbance, subjective G40.822 Epilepsy spasms, infants H33.02 +
Recommended publications
  • Optic Disc Drusen in Differential Diagnosis of Optic Neuritis Optik Nörit Ayrıcı Tanısında Optik Disk Druzeni
    DO I:10.4274/tnd.56514 Images in Clinical Neurology Optic Disc Drusen in Differential Diagnosis of Optic Neuritis Optik Nörit Ayrıcı Tanısında Optik Disk Druzeni Erkingül Shugaiv1, Elif Aksoy Güzeller2, Sait Alim2 1Tokat State Hospital, Clinic of Neurology, Tokat, Turkey 2Tokat State Hospital, Clinic of Diases Eye, Tokat, Turkey Optic disc drusen is a condition where a hyaline-like calcific object is accumulated on the optical nerve ending, often bilaterally (1). Its prevalence in the general population is 0.34-3.7%. It can be confused with optic papillitis since it blurs the papillary border at the bottom of the eye. Drusens can be seen as opacity in B-scan ultrasonography and computerized tomography (2). Optic disc drusens present with slowly progressing visual field defects. The 21-year-old patient who complained of blurry vision on both eyes did not have a history of disease. Her vision was blurry for the past 10 days, especially on the left side. There was no history of eyeball pain, headache, infection or trauma. Her vision was 0.2 on the right and 0.1 on the left side. The papillary borders were undefined on both sides in the examination of the base of Figure 1. Optic disc drusen on both sides: Discs are protruded due the eyes (Figure 1). Due to the slow clinical decline over 10 days, to the drusen and their borders are not clearly defined. cranial and spinal magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in order to address any possible demyelinating disease but did not produce any remarkable findings. After this, cranial and orbital tomography was conducted with the pre-diagnosis of optic disc drusen.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophthalmological Findings in Children and Adolescents with Silver Russell
    Ophthalmological findings in children and adolescents with Silver Russell Syndrome Marita Andersson Gronlund, Jovanna Dahlgren, Eva Aring, Maria Kraemer, Ann Hellstrom To cite this version: Marita Andersson Gronlund, Jovanna Dahlgren, Eva Aring, Maria Kraemer, Ann Hellstrom. Oph- thalmological findings in children and adolescents with Silver Russell Syndrome. British Journal of Ophthalmology, BMJ Publishing Group, 2010, 95 (5), pp.637. 10.1136/bjo.2010.184457. hal- 00588358 HAL Id: hal-00588358 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00588358 Submitted on 23 Apr 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ophthalmological findings in children and adolescents with Silver Russell Syndrome M Andersson Grönlund, MD, PhD1, J Dahlgren, MD, PhD2, E Aring, CO, PhD1, M Kraemer, MD1, A Hellström, MD, PhD1 1Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology/Ophthalmology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 2Institute for the Health of Women and Children, Gothenburg Paediatric Growth Research Centre (GP-GRC), The Sahlgrenska
    [Show full text]
  • Approved and Unapproved Abbreviations and Symbols For
    Facility: Illinois College of Optometry and Illinois Eye Institute Policy: Approved And Unapproved Abbreviations and Symbols for Medical Records Manual: Information Management Effective: January 1999 Revised: March 2009 (M.Butz) Review Dates: March 2003 (V.Conrad) March 2008 (M.Butz) APPROVED AND UNAPPROVED ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS FOR MEDICAL RECORDS PURPOSE: To establish a database of acceptable ocular and medical abbreviations for patient medical records. To list the abbreviations that are NOT approved for use in patient medical records. POLICY: Following is the list of abbreviations that are NOT approved – never to be used – for use in patient medical records, all orders, and all medication-related documentation that is either hand-written (including free-text computer entry) or pre-printed: DO NOT USE POTENTIAL PROBLEM USE INSTEAD U (unit) Mistaken for “0” (zero), the Write “unit” number “4”, or “cc” IU (international unit) Mistaken for “IV” (intravenous) Write “international unit” or the number 10 (ten). Q.D., QD, q.d., qd (daily) Mistaken for each other Write “daily” Q.O.D., QOD, q.o.d., qod Period after the Q mistaken for Write (“every other day”) (every other day) “I” and the “O” mistaken for “I” Trailing zero (X.0 mg) ** Decimal point is missed. Write X mg Lack of leading zero (.X mg) Decimal point is missed. Write 0.X mg MS Can mean morphine sulfate or Write “morphine sulfate” or magnesium sulfate “magnesium sulfate” MSO4 and MgSO4 Confused for one another Write “morphine sulfate” or “magnesium sulfate” ** Exception: A trailing zero may be used only where required to demonstrate the level of precision of the value being reported, such as for laboratory results, imaging studies that report size of lesions, or catheter/tube sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Squint Caroline Hirsch, MD, FRCPS As Presented at the College of Family Physicians of Canada’S 50Th Anniversary Conference, Toronto, Ontario (November 2004)
    Practical Approach Childhood Strabismus: Taking a Closer Look at Pediatric Squint Caroline Hirsch, MD, FRCPS As presented at the College of Family Physicians of Canada’s 50th Anniversary Conference, Toronto, Ontario (November 2004). trabismus, colloquially known as squint, is a com- Table 1 S mon pediatric problem with an incidence of three Strabismus manifestations per cent to four per cent in the population. It is fre- quently associated with poor vision because of ambly- Latent (phoria) Manifest (tropia) opia and is occasionally a harbinger of underlying neu- Convergent Esophoria Esotropia rologic or even life-threatening disease. The family Divergent Exophoria Exotropia physician has a vital role in identifying strabismus Vertical (up) Hyperphoria Hypotropia patients and re-enforcing treatment, ensuring followup Hypophoria Hypotropia and compliance once treatment is started. Comitant (the angle Non-comitant The different manifestations of strabismus derive Vertical (down) is the same in all (differs in all their name from the direction of occular deviation, as directions of gaze) directions of gaze) well as whether it is latent or manifest (Table 1). Congenital (very soon Acquired after birth) Congenital strabismus out by rotating the baby to elicit abduction nystagmus, Although babies will not outgrow strabismus, many or by “Doll’s head” quick head turn, both of which will infants have intermittent strabismus, which resolves by move the eyes into abduction. Congenital exotropia is four months, due to their immature visual system. seen infrequently, but is similar in features to congen- Therefore, it is best to delay referral for strabismus for tial esotropia. the first four to six months of an infant’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction
    OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction OPTOMETRY: THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION Doctors of optometry are independent primary health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. There are approximately 36,000 full-time-equivalent doctors of optometry currently in practice in the United States. Optometrists practice in more than 6,500 communities across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care providers in more than 3,500 communities. The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all of which enhance the quality of life. OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH ACCOMMODATIVE AND VERGENCE DYSFUNCTION Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D., Principal Author Carole R. Burns, O.D. Susan A. Cotter, O.D. Kent M. Daum, O.D., Ph.D. John R. Griffin, M.S., O.D. Mitchell M. Scheiman, O.D. Revised by: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D. December 2010 Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Posterior Uveitis Signs
    Uveitis unplugged: sorting out infectious uveitis Hobart 2017 Peter McCluskey Save Sight Institute Sydney Eye Hospital Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney Australia No financial or proprietary interest in any material discussed Immunosuppression for IED The fundamental principle for managing uveitis: Is the disease: infective inflammatory neoplastic What is the worst, most acute threat to vision this could be? Immunosuppression for IED The fundamental principle for managing uveitis: Is the disease: infective inflammatory neoplastic What is the worst, most acute threat to vision this could be? usually infection! Common Causes of Uveitis in Sydney 2015 Idiopathic 505 (50%) • idiopathic 424 Infective 203 (20%) • Fuchs 26 • Herpetic 105 • WDS 55 - anterior 83 - posterior 22 Inflammatory 358 (35%) • HLA B27 188 TB 40 (+systemic B27) 46 • • Toxoplasmosis 38 • sarcoid 56 • syphilis 10 (25) • Behcets 18 4 Assessing the patient with uveitis How do I sort this out??? • clinical assessment + carefully selected tests • clinical assessment is the key investigation • critical to take as comprehensive a history and review of systems as possible plus • thorough careful complete examination of each eye Sorting out Uveitis: anterior uveitis signs Anterior Uveitis Signs: • comprehensive a history and systems review • there are some unofficial “rules” can’t diagnose anterior uveitis without a normal fundus on dilated exam • anterior uveitis: mostly non specific signs • KPs, iris and pupil: useful clues Sorting out Uveitis: posterior uveitis
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Background Case Summary Treatment and Management Discussion Conclusion References
    Converging Cars: Adult Acute Onset Diplopia and the Treatment and Management with Fresnel Prism - Jessica Min, OD • Shmaila Tahir, OD, FAAO 3241 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60616 Illinois Eye Institute, Chicago, Illinois ABSTRACT DISCUSSION FIGURE 1a FIGURE 2a FIGURE 2b Herpes simplex keratitis is an ocular condition which possesses a The question of whether this patient had a decompensation of an standard protocol for treatment and management. This case report existing esophoria that was exacerbated by the uncontrolled diabetes highlights the use of Prokera Cryopreserved Amniotic Membranes was largely considered. No prior eye exams were performed at the (PCAM) to treat herpes simplex keratitis and examines its unanticipated, same clinic, strabismus was denied, and old photos were not provided previously unreported, anti-viral effect. to support this. Interestingly, the Fresnel prism could have helped increase his fusional vergences similar to the effects of vision therapy so that he could compensate the residual amount of 12▵ IAET. BACKGROUND Adult patients with an acute onset diplopia all share the same problem CONCLUSION of functional disability. When appropriate, prism can be a great tool to minimize symptoms and restore binocularity. This can improve quality It is important for clinicians to realize the value in utilizing prism of life. This case explores the treatment and management of an adult compared to occlusion. When fitting the Fresnel, choose the patient’s patient with an acute acquired esotropia with Fresnel prism. most useful direction of gaze, set realistic expectations, and closely monitor with frequent follow- up exams CASE SUMMARY REFERENCES A 55 year old male presented with a sudden onset of constant horizontal diplopia.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Trauma Vision Syndrome in the Combat Veteran Abstract
    Post Trauma Vision Syndrome in the Combat Veteran Abstract: A 43-year-old Hispanic male with history of traumatic brain injury presents with progressively worsening vision. Vision, stereopsis were decreased and visual field constricted to central 20° OU. Ocular health was unremarkable. I. Case History • Patient demographics: 43 year old Hispanic male • Chief complaint: Distance/near blur, peripheral side vision loss; he has stopped driving for the past year to avoid accidents. Also reports severe photophobia and must wear sunglasses full-time indoors and outdoors. Patient has had ongoing issues of anger, is easily irritable, frequently bumps into objects, and suffers from insomnia. • Ocular history: o Diabetes Type 2 without retinopathy or macular edema o Chorioretinal scar of the right eye o Cataracts o Photophobia o Esophoria with reduced compensating vergence ranges ▪ Only able to sustain reading for 10 minutes before eye fatigue, strain. Unable to concentrate, skips and loses his place while reading o Myopia, Presbyopia • Medical history: o Hyperlipidemia, diabetes type 2, sleep apnea, PTSD, chronic headaches, low back pain, vertigo o History of TBI/encephalomalacia: ▪ 1997: Sustained crown injury via a heavy bar while on ship. Subsequently right side of head hit mortar, then patient fell head first onto metal platform. Underwent loss of consciousness for ~10 minutes. ▪ 1999-2002: Exposure to several blasts while in the service. • Medications: amitriptyline, atorvastatin, capsaicin, metformin, naproxen, sumatriptan II. Pertinent findings
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Cerebral Granuloma and Optic Papillitis Due to Brucella Sp
    Hindawi Case Reports in Infectious Diseases Volume 2020, Article ID 5216249, 3 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5216249 Case Report A Case of Cerebral Granuloma and Optic Papillitis due to Brucella sp. A. Chiappe-Gonzalez 1,2 and A Solano-Loza2 1Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo, Lima, Peru 2Cl´ınica Angloamericana, San Isidro, Peru Correspondence should be addressed to A. Chiappe-Gonzalez; [email protected] Received 21 December 2019; Revised 18 April 2020; Accepted 29 June 2020; Published 18 July 2020 Academic Editor: Larry M. Bush Copyright © 2020 A. Chiappe-Gonzalez and A Solano-Loza. ,is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We document a case of a 24-year-old woman who presented with cerebral granuloma and optic papillitis associated to Brucella sp. infection, whose diagnosis was made with a brain biopsy and serology tests, with clinical improvement following specific antibiotic therapy. ,e patient was followed up for over a year without evidence of relapse. 1. Introduction Seven months prior to presentation, she had been eval- uated for this complaint; a head computed tomography (CT) Brucellosis is a common zoonotic infection in many angiography was performed which showed a hypodense, right countries, including Mediterranean and Middle Eastern occipital lesion with ill-defined borders and peripheral con- countries. In Peru, the prevalence of brucellosis has been trast enhancement (Figure 1); the study was followed by a poorly documented, with higher frequency in the cities of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which confirmed Lima, Callao, and Ica probably due to the informal goat the presence of a solid cortical formation of about 0.7 cen- farming in these regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Strabismus: a Decision Making Approach
    Strabismus A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indiana Published originally in English under the title: Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach. By Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston Published in 1994 by Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, MO Copyright held by Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the authors. Copyright © 2010 Table of Contents Foreword Preface 1.01 Equipment for Examination of the Patient with Strabismus 1.02 History 1.03 Inspection of Patient 1.04 Sequence of Motility Examination 1.05 Does This Baby See? 1.06 Visual Acuity – Methods of Examination 1.07 Visual Acuity Testing in Infants 1.08 Primary versus Secondary Deviation 1.09 Evaluation of Monocular Movements – Ductions 1.10 Evaluation of Binocular Movements – Versions 1.11 Unilaterally Reduced Vision Associated with Orthotropia 1.12 Unilateral Decrease of Visual Acuity Associated with Heterotropia 1.13 Decentered Corneal Light Reflex 1.14 Strabismus – Generic Classification 1.15 Is Latent Strabismus
    [Show full text]
  • Eye-Strain and Functional Nervous Diseases
    EYE-STRAIN AND Functional Nervous diseases. BY J. H. WOODWARD, M. D„ Prof, Diseases of Eye and Ear, Med, Dep, U, V, M, BURLINGTON, VERMONT. 1890. Eye-Strain and Functional Nervous Diseases.* J. H. WOODWARD, M. D., BURLINGTON, VT. Professor of Diseases of the Eye and Ear, University of Vermont, Mu. President—Gentlemen :— I have chosen to speak to you of Eye-Strain and Functional Nervous Dis- eases, because the discussion will take us into the field of practice in which the general practitioner and the opthalmologist have common interests. We are both engaged in the attempt to relieve the same class of patients. You have no doubt seen in medical literature extending over the past four or five years, many references to this particular subject, and you will no doubt remem- ber that the discussion of it has been animated and extremely acrimonious. The most noteworthy contributions to it have come from the pen of Dr. George T. Stevens, of New York, who was the first to direct attention to its import- ance, and who has done more than any other investigator in this department to advance our knowledge. During the past four years, I have devoted considerable time to the study of eye-strain and its effects on the general system, and I desire to lay before you now the first preliminary report of the results of my observations. In the first place, you will ask, what is eye-strain ? What does the term signify ? In the normal state, distinct vision is obtained by a minimum expenditure of nervous energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-Igg-Positive Recurrent Bilateral Optic Papillitis with Serous Retinal Detachment: a Case Report
    doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9840-17 Intern Med Advance Publication http://internmed.jp 【 CASE REPORT 】 Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-IgG-positive Recurrent Bilateral Optic Papillitis with Serous Retinal Detachment: A Case Report Tomoya Kon 1, Hiroki Hikichi 1, Tatsuya Ueno 1, Chieko Suzuki 1, Jinichi Nunomura 1, Kimihiko Kaneko 2, Toshiyuki Takahashi 2,3, Ichiro Nakashima 2 and Masahiko Tomiyama 1 Abstract: Autoantibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) have been detected in inflamma- tory demyelinating central nervous system diseases. A 30-year-old woman had blurred vision, marked optic nerve disc swelling, serous retinal detachment at the macular on optic coherence tomography, and MOG-IgG seropositivity. The patient was thought to have optic papillitis associated with MOG-IgG. Her symptoms rap- idly improved after high-dose methylprednisolone therapy. We hypothesize that serous retinal detachment was secondary, arising from optic papillitis. This is the first report of the concurrence of optic papillitis with MOG-IgG and serous retinal detachment. MOG-IgG should be tested in patients with marked optic disc swelling. Key words: IgA nephropathy, MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, optic neuritis, optic papillitis, serous retinal detachment (Intern Med Advance Publication) (DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9840-17) inflammatory diseases, such as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada dis- Introduction ease, sarcoidosis, and Behçet’s disease, disrupt the blood- retinal barrier, resulting in the development of serous retinal Autoantibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycopro- detachment (4, 5). However, to our knowledge, serous reti- tein (MOG-IgG) have been detected in patients with central nal detachment in a patient with MOG-IgG-positive optic nervous system demyelinating diseases, including acute dis- neuritis has not been reported to date.
    [Show full text]