Download 149.72 KB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

SUMMARY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION REPORT Supplementary Appendix to the Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors on the GRAIN PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT UZBEKISTAN The IEE is available on request. 14 November 2003 Supplementary Appendix H 1 PART I: SUMMARY INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION A. INTRODUCTION 1. This report summarizes the results of the initial environmental examination (IEE), which investigated the Project’s negative and positive environmental effects. Quantitative descriptions will be given where the data allow. B. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 2. The Project is an agricultural improvement project that aims at increasing the efficiency and productivity of wheat cultivation in an economically and environmentally sustainable manner. The Project is classified as a category B project. 3. The proposed Project scope comprises four components: (i) wheat varietal selection and seed production; (ii) enhancement of farm management; (iii) agricultural enterprise development, including provision of farm machinery services; and (iv) project management. The last component will have no environmental impacts and is excluded from this examination. 4. The Project activities will center on three focus rayons (districts) of Kuyi-Chirchik (in Tashkent oblast), Zamin (Djizak) and Katakurgan (Samarkand). The areas of the three rayons are 146,778 ha, 286,000 ha and 56,000 ha, respectively. The Project will provide broader assistance (introduction to new varieties, seed production quality control, extension technologies) to five provinces (oblasts) of Uzbekistan. These are Tashkent, Syrdarya, Djizak, Samarkand, and Kashkadarya. They are located in the central-east and south-eastern regions of the country. C. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1 Physical and Ecological Resources 5. The focus rayon of Kuyi-Chirchik is located in the southern end of the Tashkent oblast. The Chirchik River, a tributary of the Syrdaya that originates in the Kyrgyz Republic, traverses through the district. The land is mostly a gentle sloping plain in which alluvial sediments are the main constituents of the soil, classified by in the local system as sierozems and meadow soils. The admixture of aeolian deposits with sandy alluvium from the mountains has produced moderately fertile soils. The greater part of the irrigable land to the northwest of the district receives water from the Chirchik River. The Angrien River, the upstream and parallel tributary of the Syrdarya, bounds the district to the southeast and provides irrigation water to the southeast zone. 6. The focus rayon of Zamin is the eastern most district in the Djizak oblast. Zamin is bounded to the south and east by the mountains bordering Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Much of the district is mountainous, with a nature reserve and national park in the higher elevation outside the cultivated agricultural areas. The main cultivated area in the district is the irrigated plain that slopes down gradually from the higher piedmont zone in the south northwards toward the Syrdarya River. The cultivated area is divided into three zones, with the southern most end being marginally1 irrigable. The soil of the area is predominantly sierozem, changing from gray to brown down the slope. Colluvium and alluvium from the hills have 1 Marginally irrigated areas are those that now do not receive any irrigation water or that receive only enough to supplement rainfall. Supplementary Appendix H 2 formed well-drained, sandy and loamy soils in the upper zone, where the water table is 2-4m deep and too deep to cause salinity problems. Much of the mid-zone is under-lain by a thick and impermeable gypsum horizon at 1.5 to 2 m deep. This horizon interrupts the natural leaching of salts by rain and irrigation water so that not only is the water table in summer about 1.5m deep, but secondary salinity has created a moderate level of salinity over a considerable area. The lower zone receives lateral drainage of groundwater from above so the water table during summer is 1 to 1.5m deep, and a serious level of secondary salinity is common, due to failure of the drainage system. 7. The rayon of Katakurgan is the most westerly district in the Samarkand oblast. The district receives most of its water from the Zarafshan River, a major tributary of the Amudarya that originates in Tajikistan and flows westwards. The central zone of the district is the meadowlands and interfluves of the two rivers; it has flat and fertile alluvial land. The district soils are loams and sandy loams, with relatively high infiltration rate. Most of the land in the district is non-saline. Sixteen percent of riverine land has a summer water table between 1 and 2 m deep and is only slightly saline. 8. Five project oblasts included under the Project cover three of Uzbekistan’ main climatic zones, which are the low plains and dry steppes, foothills, and mountains. Nearly all cultivated lands are in the low plain and steppes zone which is between 400 m mean sea level (MSL) to 1,200 m MSL. Average precipitation in this zone ranges from 250 mm to less than 400 mm per year, with maximum precipitation occurring in March and April, with August and September as driest months. Winter is short and produces little snow cover. Snowfall totals around 2 to 11 cm. Spring is likewise short and can begin as early as late February. The growing season starts in early March in the south, and late March/early April in the Tashkent oblast. Summers are hot and dry and last from early June until September. The hottest months are July and August. 9. Almost 100 percent of surface water resources in the Project area are found in the drainage basins of the two major rivers of Syrdarya and Amudarya flow from east to west with upper watersheds in the Kyrgyz Republic and Tajkistan, respectively. The Tashkent, Syrdarya, and Djizak oblasts are in the Syrdarya basin, downstream (i.e., west) of the most fertile agricultural region of Fergana valley in the eastern part of the country (which is outside the Project area). The oblasts of Samarkand, and Kaskadarya, in the southern half of the Project area, are in the Amudarya basin. For the Syrdaya, of the total flow of 46 million m3/year, 28 percent (13 m3) is estimated to be diverted to the oblasts of Tashkent, Syrdarya and Djizak. Of the average total flow of 70 million m3/year on the Amudarya, 15 percent (11 million m3) is diverted to the oblasts of Kaskadarya and Samarkand. More than 95 percent of the surface water diversions are for irrigation. 10. In 2000, the five Project oblasts had a total of 852,700 hectares (ha) of wheat cultivation area distributed to both irrigated and rain fed areas as shown in Table 1. The Table shows that 43.5 per cent of the land cultivated in 2000 was planted to wheat; 28.6 percent was irrigated and 15.0 percent under the rain fed system. Supplementary Appendix H 3 Table 1: Wheat Production in Project Area in 2000 Total Wheat Area Wheat Wheat Total WheatAgricultural as % of Total Oblast Area Yield Production Land Ag. Land Ha t/ha Tons ha % Irrigated Wheat Djizak 108,500 2.2 239,900 396,000 27.40 Kashkadariya 152,000 2.1 320,560 478,000 31.80 Samarkand 100,000 2.6 260,100 448,000 22.32 Syrdariya 93,700 2.0 190,211 265,000 35.36 Tashkent 105,500 3.3 345,050 372,000 28.36 Total 559,700 1,355,821 1,959,000 28.57 Dryland/Rainfed Wheat Djizak 110,000 0.6 66,000 396,000 27.77 Kashkadariya 92,000 0.6 55,200 478,000 19.25 Samarkand 74,000 0.6 44,400 448,000 16.52 Syrdariya 0 0.6 0 265,000 0.00 Tashkent 17,000 0.6 10,200 372,000 4.57 Total 293,000 175,800 1,959,000 14.96 2 Human and Economic Development 11. Wheat is produced by all types of farms. Wheat is a very common crop on shirkat and private farms. In the case of house plot owners, about 70 percent of house plot owners in Djizak, Samarkand, and Karkadarya grow wheat principally to meet the subsistence needs of poorer households2. 12. Kuyi-Chirchik. The area has a relatively high density of population and is visibly more prosperous than the national average. Although it is within daily commuting distance of the city of Tashkent, the economy of the district is predominantly agricultural. Of the 56,000ha of arable land, 37,500ha is irrigable, with 40% of cotton and 39% of wheat. Population is estimated at 96,000, giving an average density of 2.6 persons per irrigable ha or about 1.7ha of irrigable land per family. 13. Zamin. Some 124,000 people live in the 286,000 km2 of the district, mostly concentrated in the piedmont and lower zones of irrigable land, about 338 km2. Average population density is 3.7 per ha of irrigated land or about 1.4 ha of irrigated land per family. The district has large tracts of rangeland grazing that supports privately owned flocks and herds but there is little employment other than agricultural labor. The district is probably below average in terms of family income. 14. Katakurgan. The total population of 180,000 is fairly densely distributed, many in the urban zone and most of the remainder on the lowland farms. Average population density is 6.8 persons/irrigated ha or about 0.7ha of irrigated land per family. This density is greater than the other two districts but doubtless is weighted by including the large urban population 2 The Ministry of Health, Tashkent annual norm for consumption of bread products per capita was established as 98.6 kg in 0ctober 1990.
Recommended publications
  • Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan

    Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan

    Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of Kashmir in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy (M. Phil) In History By Farooq Ahmad Rather Under the Supervision of Prof. Aijaz A. Bandey CENTRE OF CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES University of Kashmir, Srinagar- 190006 JAMMU AND KASHMIR, INDIA September, 2012 Centre of Central Asian Studies University of Kashmir, Srinagar “A” Grade NAAC Accredited CERTIFICATE Certified that the thesis entitled “Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan” submitted by Farooq Ahmad Rather for the Degree of M. Phil in the discipline of History is an original piece of research work. This work has not been submitted fully or partially so far anywhere for the award of any degree. The scholar worked under my supervision on whole time basis for the period required under statues and has put in the required attendance in the Centre. Prof. Aijaz A. Bandey (Supervisor) Countersigned (Prof. G. R. Jan) Director Declaration I solemnly declare that the Dissertation entitled “Status of Russian Ethnic Minority in Independent Tajikistan” submitted by me in the discipline of History under the supervision of Prof. Aijaz A. Bandey embodies my own contribution. This work, which does not contain piracy, has not been submitted, so far, anywhere for the award of any degree. Dated Signature 5 October 2012 Farooq Ahmad Rather CCAS University of Kashmir, Srinagar CONTENTS Page No. Preface i Chapter-I Introduction 1
  • The University of Chicago Old Elites Under Communism: Soviet Rule in Leninobod a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Di

    The University of Chicago Old Elites Under Communism: Soviet Rule in Leninobod a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Di

    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OLD ELITES UNDER COMMUNISM: SOVIET RULE IN LENINOBOD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY FLORA J. ROBERTS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................. ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One. Noble Allies of the Revolution: Classroom to Battleground (1916-1922) . 43 Chapter Two. Class Warfare: the Old Boi Network Challenged (1925-1930) ............... 105 Chapter Three. The Culture of Cotton Farms (1930s-1960s) ......................................... 170 Chapter Four. Purging the Elite: Politics and Lineage (1933-38) .................................. 224 Chapter Five. City on Paper: Writing Tajik in Stalinobod (1930-38) ............................ 282 Chapter Six. Islam and the Asilzodagon: Wartime and Postwar Leninobod .................. 352 Chapter Seven. The
  • Birth of Tajikistan : National Identity and the Origins of the Republic

    Birth of Tajikistan : National Identity and the Origins of the Republic

    THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN i THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN ii THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN For Suzanne Published in 2007 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com In the United States of America and Canada distributed by Palgrave Macmillan a division of St. Martin's Press, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © Paul Bergne The right of Paul Bergne to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by the author in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. International Library of Central Asian Studies 1 ISBN: 978 1 84511 283 7 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: available Printed and bound in India by Replika Press Pvt. Ltd From camera-ready copy edited and supplied by the author THE BIRTH OF TAJIKISTAN v CONTENTS Abbreviations vii Transliteration ix Acknowledgements xi Maps. Central Asia c 1929 xii Central Asia c 1919 xiv Introduction 1 1. Central Asian Identities before 1917 3 2. The Turkic Ascendancy 15 3. The Revolution and After 20 4. The Road to Soviet Power 28 5.
  • Women in Uzbekistan Prepared in 1999 by Dinara Alimdjanova, Former Gender Specialist at ADB’S Uzbekistan Resident Mission

    Women in Uzbekistan Prepared in 1999 by Dinara Alimdjanova, Former Gender Specialist at ADB’S Uzbekistan Resident Mission

    Country Briefing Paper Women in the Republic of Uzbekistan Prepared by Wendy Mee FEBRUARY 2001 Acknowledgments This Country Briefing Paper on the status of Women in the Republic of Uzbekistan would not have been possible without the assistance and guidance of many people. In particular, I must thank Mekhri Khudayberdiyeva from ADB’s Resident Mission in Uzbekistan. Ms. Khudayberdiyeva proved a valuable research colleague, whose fluency in Russian, Uzbek and English, and organizational skills made the research possible. Furthermore, her good judgment and sense of humor made the research highly enjoyable. The report also benefited from her very helpful feedback on the draft report and her help in the preparation of the two appendices. I also owe a debt of gratitude to all the people in Uzbekistan who gave so generously of their time and experience. In particular, I would like to thank those who allowed me to interview them, observe training days, or participate in other related activities. I would also like to thank the participants of the Gender and Development consultative meeting held at ADB’s Resident Mission in Tashkent on 16 November 2000. I am deeply grateful to the following individuals: Dilbar Gulyamova (Deputy Prime Minister, Republic of Uzbekistan) Dilovar Kabulova (Women’s Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan) Sayora Khodjaeva (Deputy Hokim, Tashkent Oblast) Nariman Mannapbekov (Cabinet of Ministries) Galina Saidova (Cabinet of Ministries) Gasanov M. and Jurayeva Feruza Tulkunovna (Institute for Monitoring Acting Legislation
  • Thesis Final

    Thesis Final

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository Entrepreneurship and Business in Uzbekistan: Historical Perspective and Current Obstacles A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Economics By Toshtemir Majidov December 2007 DECLARATION In accordance with the Regulations for Higher Degrees by Research, I hereby declare that the whole thesis now submitted for the candidature of Doctor of Philosophy is a result of my own research and independent work except where reference is made to published literature. I also hereby certify that the work embodied in this thesis has not already been submitted in any substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree from any other institute of higher learning. I am responsible for any errors and omissions present in the thesis. Candidate: _______________________________ Toshtemir Majidov Acknowledgements Now, having completed the work of four long years, it is a pleasure to thank the many people who made this thesis possible. My greatest debt is to Dipak Ghosh, my principle supervisor, who offered support and guidance well beyond his academic responsibilities. His insightful comments and sharp observations helped to shape, what was a raw idea, into this thesis. I am especially grateful to Sheila Dow, my second supervisor, for her valuable advices and encouragement. She has always been there for me during the whole period and I could not thank her enough for the amount of favours she has done for me. I would also like to thank all the members of staff at the Department of Economics for making my time at the Department a very enjoyable one.
  • CAUCASUS, CENTRAL and SOUTH ASIA Uzbekistan Reopens Border Checkpoints with Tajikistan

    CAUCASUS, CENTRAL and SOUTH ASIA Uzbekistan Reopens Border Checkpoints with Tajikistan

    CAUCASUS, CENTRAL AND SOUTH ASIA Uzbekistan Reopens Border Checkpoints with Tajikistan OE Watch Commentary: The President of Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, has made improving relations “Over the past eight years only two border checkpoints with neighboring states a priority since taking office operated between the two countries – Tursunzade-Sariosiyo in December 2016. The accompanying excerpts from Uzbek and Tajik sources report on the government of and Fotekhobod-Oybek.” Uzbekistan’s recent decision to reopen several checkpoints Source: “Узбекистан обустраивает старые и открывает новые КПП on the Uzbek-Tajik border after years of remaining closed (Uzbekistan is equipping old and opening new border checkpoints),” Anhor, 24 under former President Islam Karimov. This could be February 2018. https://anhor.uz/news/uzbekistan-obustraivaet-starie-i-otkrivaet- the most significant of Mirziyoyev’s efforts to improve novie-kpp relations in the region, as Uzbekistan’s relationship with The government of Uzbekistan reached a decision on the resumption of activities Tajikistan under Karimov stood as the worst compared to of some border checkpoints on the Uzbek-Tajik border…Another important relationships with other regional governments. announcement is that a new checkpoint will be set up in the Samarkand The article from Anhor, a Russian language news Oblast, located in the village of Jartepa, Urgut District…a number of different website in Uzbekistan, reports on the recent decision disagreements regularly took place between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, including the demarcation of the border. However, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, after coming to and that “a new checkpoint will be set up in the power, engaged in a “reset” of relations with neighboring states, in particular Samarkand Oblast, located in the village of Jartepa, Urgut Tajikistan… District.” The article also notes that there were regular disagreements between the Tajik and Uzbek governments Source: Yuldashev, Avaz.
  • Migration and Ethnic Diversity in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space

    Migration and Ethnic Diversity in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space

    The London School of Economics and Political Science Migration and Ethnic Diversity in the Soviet and Post-Soviet Space Youngook Jang A thesis submitted to the Department of Economic History of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, September 2018 1 Declaration I, Youngook Jang, certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 42,588 words, including footnotes and tables, but excluding front matter, bibliography, and appendices. 2 Acknowledgement I have been lucky to have many people helping me finish one of the hardest challenges in my life – having Dr in front of my name. My main supervisor, Professor Chris Minns, has always been there when I sought his wise advice, which guided me in the right direction during the whole process of writing a PhD thesis. The second supervisor, Professor Oliver Volckart, has also given me useful and eye-opening comments, many of which I would not have thought up for myself.
  • Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945

    Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945

    Making Ivan-Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945 By Charles David Shaw A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair Professor Victoria Frede-Montemayor Professor Victoria E. Bonnell Summer 2015 Abstract Making Ivan-Uzbek: War, Friendship of the Peoples, and the Creation of Soviet Uzbekistan, 1941-1945 by Charles David Shaw Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair This dissertation addresses the impact of World War II on Uzbek society and contends that the war era should be seen as seen as equally transformative to the tumultuous 1920s and 1930s for Soviet Central Asia. It argues that via the processes of military service, labor mobilization, and the evacuation of Soviet elites and common citizens that Uzbeks joined the broader “Soviet people” or sovetskii narod and overcame the prejudices of being “formerly backward” in Marxist ideology. The dissertation argues that the army was a flexible institution that both catered to national cultural (including Islamic ritual) and linguistic difference but also offered avenues for assimilation to become Ivan-Uzbeks, part of a Russian-speaking, pan-Soviet community of victors. Yet as the war wound down the reemergence of tradition and violence against women made clear the limits of this integration. The dissertation contends that the war shaped the contours of Central Asian society that endured through 1991 and created the basis for thinking of the “Soviet people” as a nation in the 1950s and 1960s.
  • REPORT of the Authorized Person of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan for Human Rights (Ombudsman) for 2006

    REPORT of the Authorized Person of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan for Human Rights (Ombudsman) for 2006

    REPORT of the Authorized Person of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan for Human Rights (Ombudsman) for 2006 Tashkent – 2007 2 CONTENTS of the Report of the Authorized Person of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan for Human Rights (Ombudsman) for 2006 pages Introduction 3 – 4 I. Improvement of the Human Rights Legislation of Uzbekistan and Monitoring of its Enforcement 4 – 12 II. Practices of Reviewing Individual Complaints and Redressing their 12 – 38 Violated Rights and Liberties III. Performance of Ombudswoman’s Regional Representatives 38 – 45 IV. Cooperation with Government Institutions and Public Sector 45 – 48 V. Information and Awareness-raising Activities 48 – 52 VI. International Human Rights Cooperation 52 - 59 Conclusion 59 -60 Annexes 61 - 69 © Authorized Person of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan for Human Rights (Ombudsman), 2007. 3 Introduction Past Year 2006 was an intensive and event-rich year in the life of our country. Democratic course of development of our nation was reflected in the positive shifts in the judicial and legal reforms, which translated into enhanced role, independence and specialization of the courts, development of civil society spurred by the increasing public and political engagement of citizens, more robust involvement of political parties in nation-building, and advancing multilateral international cooperation featuring active economic contacts and humanitarian relations. New initiatives by Mr. Islam Karimov, the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan to advance the profile of political parties reflected new facets of the concept of democratization and public renewal, and ultimate objectives of reforming and modernizing the nation in the long-run have reaffirmed Uzbekistan’s commitment to the welfare-oriented model of its development.
  • Literary Culture and Social Change Among the Northern Kyrgyz, 1856-1924

    Literary Culture and Social Change Among the Northern Kyrgyz, 1856-1924

    Visions of Community: Literary Culture and Social Change among the Northern Kyrgyz, 1856-1924 Jipar Duishembieva A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Elena Campbell, Chair Glennys Young Ali Igmen Program Authorized to offer Degree: Near and Middle Eastern Studies Program ©Copyright 2015 Jipar Duishembieva University of Washington Abstract Visions of Community: Literary Culture and Social Change among the Northern Kyrgyz, 1856-1924 Jipar Duishembieva Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Elena Campbell, Associate Professor Department of History This dissertation examines the transformations in the northern Kyrgyz society and culture between the mid-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. I explore how a deeply-held and territorially-oriented sense of collective belonging among the Kyrgyz developed within the Russian imperial context through the efforts of the Kyrgyz poets and intellectuals during the late tsarist period. I search for this sense of collective belonging in the literary culture of the northern Kyrgyz. In the absence of written culture, oral tradition served as the primary depository of the northern Kyrgyz collective memory. Oral poets were the ones who shaped group identities and created various versions of Kyrgyzness based on culture, lifestyle, religious belief, social practices, and moral values. By the late imperial period, these existing conceptions of Kyrgyzness served as a fertile ground for the first generation of Kyrgyz intellectuals to develop their own visions of Kyrgyz community. They started collecting and writing what they believed to be the history of their people, thus contributing to the creation of the nationalistic narrative and participating in a broader discourse on the nation in the intellectual circles of the Central Asian elites.
  • Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses The Russian advance in Central Asia and the British response 1834 - 1884. Tealakh, Gali Oda How to cite: Tealakh, Gali Oda (1991) The Russian advance in Central Asia and the British response 1834 - 1884., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1516/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Abstract THE RUSSIAN ADVANCE IN CENTRAL ASIA AND THE BRITISH RESPONSE 1834 - 1885 by Gali Oda Tealakh Supervisor Dr. David W. Sweet This thesis is a study of Russia's expansion at the expense of the Khanates of Central Asia in the nineteenth century, beginning with the early exploratory missions of the 1 830s and 1 840s, continuing with the conquest of Kokand and Bukhara in the 1860s, the subjection of Khiva in 1873, and concluding with the fall of Mery in 1884.
  • Mutual Relations and Perceptions of Russians and Central Asians: Preliminary Notes for Comparative Imperial Studies

    Mutual Relations and Perceptions of Russians and Central Asians: Preliminary Notes for Comparative Imperial Studies

    Mutual Relations and Perceptions of Russians and Central Asians: Preliminary Notes for Comparative Imperial Studies UYAMA Tomohiko Recently, similar interests have emerged among historians of various empires and colonies. Growing attention is being paid to the multiconfessional and multinational characters of empires, interactions between imperial powers and local communities, the invention of traditions, and Orientalism and its internalization by Oriental people themselves. However, this trend has appeared either coincidentally or as a result of independent adoption of common theoretical concepts, rather than from collaboration between historians of different empires. As we have launched comparative research on empires in the framework of a project on major regional powers in Eurasia,1 I would like to present, for the sake of further research, some very preliminary observations on how to recognize and analyze similarities and differences between Russian Central Asia and other colonies and empires, especially British India and the Ottoman Empire, in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. My analysis mainly addresses mutual perceptions of colonizers and colonized, although I deal with this topic not merely as a problem of representation and discourse, but also as one that is linked with the policies and strategies of both sides. Who is better for Russia: “savage” nomads, or “fanatical” Muslims? The first point I would like to focus on is that, while postcolonial studies have contributed much to the studies of empires and colonies, they have exaggerated the dichotomy of colonizer and colonized. At least in the Russian Empire, the relations between the authorities and local people were constructed in parallel with manipulation of interethnic relations, and it is essential to analyze the authorities’ attitude to two or more groups of people simultaneously.