DOCSLIB.ORG

Kennebec River Influence on Nutrient Regimes and Phytoplankton Communities in Harpswell Sound

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kennebec River Influence on Nutrient Regimes and Phytoplankton Communities in Harpswell Sound Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Honors Projects Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2020 Living Upstream: Kennebec River Influence on Nutrient Regimes and Phytoplankton Communities in Harpswell Sound Siena Brook Ballance Bowdoin College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Biochemistry Commons, Climate Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Hydrology Commons, Oceanography Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Ballance, Siena Brook, "Living Upstream: Kennebec River Influence on Nutrient Regimes and Phytoplankton Communities in Harpswell Sound" (2020). Honors Projects. 209. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/209 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Living Upstream: Kennebec River Influence on Nutrient Regimes and Phytoplankton Communities in Harpswell Sound An Honors Paper for the Department of Earth and Oceanographic Science By Siena Brook Ballance Bowdoin College, 2020 ©2020 Siena Brook Ballance Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the help from my advisor, Collin Roesler and my two Honors committee members, Michelle Fame and Michèle LaVigne. Thank you for all of your help and support this year and throughout my time in the Earth and Oceanographic Science Department at Bowdoin College. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... ii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Harpswell Sound and the Kennebec River ........................................................................................... 2 Questions and Hypotheses ...................................................................................................................... 6 Background .................................................................................................................................... 8 Phytoplankton Classes ............................................................................................................................ 8 Gulf of Maine, Harpswell Sound, and Kennebec River Phytoplankton ............................................................... 8 Controls on Phytoplankton Functional Types ...................................................................................... 9 Nutrients ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 River Flow Regime............................................................................................................................................. 10 River versus Ocean Influence on the Gulf of Maine and Harpswell Sound .................................... 11 Kennebec River Influence .................................................................................................................................. 11 Ocean Influence .................................................................................................................................................. 15 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Sample Collection and Processing ....................................................................................................... 16 Kennebec River .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Harpswell Sound ................................................................................................................................................ 17 Phytoplankton Pigment as a Proxy for Phytoplankton Taxonomy .................................................. 17 Data Analyses ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Lag Correlation Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 19 Hierarchical Cluster Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 20 Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) Analysis ................................................................................................ 20 Results........................................................................................................................................... 21 Kennebec Watershed Bedrock and Land Use .................................................................................... 21 Nutrient Concentration and Composition .......................................................................................... 23 Spatial Trends ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 Temporal Trends ................................................................................................................................................ 25 Phytoplankton Pigment Concentration and Composition................................................................. 28 Spatial Trends ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Temporal Trends ................................................................................................................................................ 30 Kennebec River Phytoplankton Communities ................................................................................... 32 Kennebec River Cluster Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 32 Kennebec River Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis ................................................................................ 32 EOF Spatial Trends ............................................................................................................................................ 33 EOF Temporal Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 34 Upstream Kennebec River Phytoplankton Communities ................................................................. 37 Upstream Cluster Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 37 iii Upstream Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis .......................................................................................... 38 EOF Spatial Trends ............................................................................................................................................ 38 EOF Temporal Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 39 Harpswell Sound Nutrient Regime ...................................................................................................... 42 EOF Temporal Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 42 Harpswell Sound Phytoplankton Communities ................................................................................. 44 Harpswell Sound Cluster Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 44 Harpswell Sound Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis 2011-2013 ............................................................ 44 EOF Temporal Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 45 Harpswell Sound Long Term Trends .................................................................................................. 47 Harpswell Sound Nutrient Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis 2008-2017.............................................. 47 Harpswell Sound Pigment Empirical Orthogonal Function Analysis 2008-2017.............................................. 49 Discussion..................................................................................................................................... 52 Distinct River and Ocean Nutrient Regimes and Phytoplankton Communities ............................. 52 Upstream, Freshwater Nutrients and Phytoplankton Communities ................................................ 53 Downstream, Tidal Nutrients
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? The Kennebec Estuary Focus Area contains more than 20 percent of Maine’s tidal marshes, a significant percentage of Maine’s sandy beach and associated dune Biophysical Region habitats, and globally rare pitch pine • Central Maine Embayment woodland communities. More than two • Cacso Bay Coast dozen rare plant species inhabit the area’s diverse natural communities. Numerous imperiled species of animals have been documented in the Focus Area, and it contains some of the state’s best habitat for bald eagles. OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION » Work with willing landowners to permanently protect remaining undeveloped areas. » Encourage town planners to improve approaches to development that may impact Focus Area functions. » Educate recreational users about the ecological and economic benefits provided by the Focus Area. » Monitor invasive plants to detect problems early. » Find ways to mitigate past and future contamination of the watershed. For more conservation opportunities, visit the Beginning with Habitat Online Toolbox: www.beginningwithhabitat.org/ toolbox/about_toolbox.html. Rare Animals Rare Plants Natural Communities Bald Eagle Lilaeopsis Estuary Bur-marigold Coastal Dune-marsh Ecosystem Spotted Turtle Mudwort Long-leaved Bluet Maritime Spruce–Fir Forest Harlequin Duck Dwarf Bulrush Estuary Monkeyflower Pitch Pine Dune Woodland Tidewater Mucket Marsh Bulrush Smooth Sandwort
    [Show full text]
  • American Eel Distribution and Dam Locations in the Merrymeeting Bay
    Seboomook Lake American Eel Distribution and Dam Ripogenus Lake Locations in the Merrymeeting Bay Pittston Farm North East Carry Lobster Lake Watershed (Androscoggin and Canada Falls Lake Rainbow Lake Kennebec River Watersheds) Ragged Lake a d a n Androscoggin River Watershed (3,526 sq. miles) a C Upper section (1,363 sq. miles) South Twin Lake Rockwood Lower section (2,162 sq. miles) Kokadjo Turkey Tail Lake Kennebec River Watershed (6,001 sq. miles) Moosehead Lake Wood Pond Long Pond Long Pond Dead River (879 sq. miles) Upper Jo-Mary Lake Upper Section (1,586 sq. miles) Attean Pond Lower Section (3,446 sq. miles) Number Five Bog Lowelltown Lake Parlin Estuary (90 sq. miles) Round Pond Hydrology; 1:100,000 National Upper Wilson Pond Hydrography Dataset Greenville ! American eel locations from MDIFW electrofishing surveys Spencer Lake " Dams (US Army Corps and ME DEP) Johnson Bog Shirley Mills Brownville Junction Brownville " Monson Sebec Lake Milo Caratunk Eustis Flagstaff Lake Dover-Foxcroft Guilford Stratton Kennebago Lake Wyman Lake Carrabassett Aziscohos Lake Bingham Wellington " Dexter Exeter Corners Oquossoc Rangeley Harmony Kingfield Wilsons Mills Rangeley Lake Solon Embden Pond Lower Richardson Lake Corinna Salem Hartland Sebasticook Lake Newport Phillips Etna " Errol New Vineyard " Madison Umbagog Lake Pittsfield Skowhegan Byron Carlton Bog Upton Norridgewock Webb Lake Burnham e Hinckley Mercer r Farmington Dixmont i h s " Andover e p Clinton Unity Pond n i m a a Unity M H East Pond Wilton Fairfield w e Fowler Bog Mexico N Rumford
    [Show full text]
  • The Forks ATV Trails
    Ragged Norcross Lake Mountain Tomhegan Pond p oo h L nc ra B th r o Big Spencer N Mountain d a o R o m e Spencer D Pond Lucky Lake Kokadjo Rockwood Black Brassua Brook Hill Lake d a o First Roach R Jackman o Pond L m o e Jackman ng n Little Po D d Loop Brassua Lake Little Big 668-2691 Wood Pond Moosehead Lake Long Pond Wood Pond Long Pond Mountain Attean Overlook d a o Lily Bay R Owls Head l Mountain t a i Moosehead p a Attean C Lily Bay Pond State Park Attean Mountain Burnham Pond Pa Prong Catheart rli Burnt Jacket n L o Pond Mountain o Mountain p Indian B-52 Crash Site Parlin Pond Mtn View Pond Pond Upper Road d ncer a Wilson Pond Spe o R Whipple y a Pond B Blue y l i Lower Ridge L d a Wilson Pond o Trout Pond R l a it Mountain p a Cold C Stream Falls Coburn Greenville Mountain d a o R Greenville Fish m Enchanted a Pond D s Pond i r r a H 911 West Forks RESCUE A Baker Pond 15 Mile Lodge & Outfitters 10 Spencer Moxie Falls Lake Lake RESCUE E Onawa King and Hawk’s Nest Lodge C.Moxie Gore Outfitters, Inc. Bartlett Lake 8 9 West Forks r Shi l e y R o a d Ledge Hill ake xie Ro Shirley Mills L Mo a d 911 RESCUE B Marshalls 7 Inn by the River 6 The Forks T r o RESCUE D u t d a l e Grand Falls Upper R o Eustis a Pierce Pond d RESCUE C Lake Basin 911 Monson Moxie Hebron Mountain Pond Northern Outdoors Lodge 5 Pleasant Pond Mountain Bald Mountain Pierce Blanchard Pond Fl a Pond Pleasant Kennebec River g s t Pond a Ice Jam Flagstaff f f Mountain R o a Spring Moosehorn d Flagstaff Lake Caratunk Lake Backcountry Expeditions 4 Moxie Mtn Balsamwoods
    [Show full text]
  • Kennebec Floodplain- Madison and Anson Beginning with Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Habitat Kennebec Floodplain- Madison and Anson
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Kennebec Floodplain- Madison and Anson Beginning with Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Habitat Kennebec Floodplain- Madison and Anson Biophysical Region • Central Maine Embayment WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? Rare Animals This focus area hosts a concentration of ecological features Bald Eagle associated with the flooding regime of the Kennebec and Brook Floater Carrabassett Rivers. The rich alluvial soils of floodplain forest Wood Turtle provide unique habitat conditions for several rare plants. Rare Plants The presence of rare animals such as the brook floater Bottlebrush Grass mussel and wood turtle attest to the presence of good Long-leaved Bluet water quality and unfragmented habitat. In total, the river, MacGregor’s Rye islands, and floodplain in this focus area support two rare Wild Garlic natural communities, five rare plant species and three rare Wild Leek animal species, all within a relatively small area around the Rare and Exemplary intersection of these two large rivers. Natural Communities Silver Maple Floodplain Forest OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION Upper Floodplain Hardwood Forest » Encourage best management practices for forestry, vegeta- tion clearing, and soil disturbance activities near significant Significant Wildlife Habitats Inland Wading Bird and Waterfowl features. Habitat » Encourage landowners to maintain enhanced riparian buf- Deer Wintering Area fers. » Encourage town planners to improve approaches to devel- opment that may impact focus area functions. » Monitor and remove any invasive plant populations. » Work with landowners to encourage sustainable forest management practices on remaining privately owned lands. Public Access Opportunities » Boat launches near North For more conservation opportunities, visit the Beginning Anson, Madison and Savage with Habitat Online Toolbox: www.beginningwithhabitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States 1915 Part I
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 401 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES 1915 PART I. NORTH ATLANTIC SIOPE DRAINAGE BASINS NATHAN C. GROVES, Chief Hydraulic Engineer C. H. PIERCE, C. C. COVERT, and G. C. STEVENS. District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with the States of MAIXE, VERMONT, MASSACHUSETTS, and NEW YORK WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1917 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 401 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES 1915 PART I. NORTH ATLANTIC SLOPE DRAINAGE BASINS NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer C. H. PIERCE, C. C. COVERT; and G. C. STEVENS, District Engineers Geological Prepared in cooperation with the States MAINE, VERMONT, MASSACHUSETTS^! N«\f Yd] WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPEBINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE "WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 15 CENTS PER COPY V CONTENTS. Authorization and scope of work........................................... 7 Definition of terms....................................................... 8 Convenient equivalents.................................................... 9 Explanation of data...................................................... 11 Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 12 Cooperation..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood of April 1987 in Maine
    FLOOD OF APRIL 1987 IN MAINE By Richard A. Fontaine and Joseph P. Nielsen U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 92-141 Prepared in cooperation with the MAINE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Augusta, Maine 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR ., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL S0RVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director For additional information write: Copies of report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division U.S. Geol Dgical Survey 26 Canneston Drive Box 25425 Federal Center Augusta, ME 04330 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 1 Purpose and scope .............................................. 2 Acknowledgments................................................ 2 Hydrometeorologic setting............................................ 2 Physiography and geology....................................... 2 Antecedent hydrologic conditions ............................... 4 Runoff................................................... 13 Storage.................................................. 15 Storm characteristics.......................................... 17 Precipitation............................................ 18 Temperature.............................................. 22 Description of flood................................................. 23 Flood discharge and frequency.................................. 24 Flood crests..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 2003 People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J. Michor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Michor, Daniel J., "People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine" (2003). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 188. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/188 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVlRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE BY Daniel J. Michor B.A. University of Wisconsin, 2000 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2003 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor of History, Advisor Howard Segal, Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology Alexander Huryn, Associate Professor of Aquatic Entomology PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE By Daniel J. Michor Thesis Advisor: Dr. Richard Judd An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) May, 2003 The quality of a river affects the tributaries, lakes, and estuary it feeds; it affects the wildlife and vegetation that depend on the river for energy, nutrients, and habitat, and also affects the human community in the form of use, access, pride, and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Chapter
    Natural Resources Chapter (For review – September 8, 2015) Vision: Richmond residents are responsible stewards of our natural resources, including open space, forest, water bodies and wetlands. We balance growth and development with the preservation, promotion and continued accessibility of our resources for recreation, wildlife habitat, agriculture, and scenic values. Introduction This chapter provides a summary about the natural systems which comprise Richmond’s physical environment. The following areas will be discussed to determine how our natural features relate to the overall health and vitality of the town and its future development and land use patterns: geology, topography, soils, surface and ground water, land cover, and unique natural areas and wildlife habitat. A realistic assessment and appreciation of our environmental features will allow us to both identify constraints on development and to identify areas appropriate for development where negative impacts to natural resources are minimal and costs are lower for construction. The town’s natural resources are regulated by a combination of federal, state and local laws and regulations and often address the same feature. Some resources require multiple levels of review and approval before land development may occur while others are less restrictive. The information provided in this chapter is designed to help the community understand its natural resources and make sure land use planning and development occurs in such a way that future generations can enjoy the values and beauty of the town. Watersheds Richmond is divided into eight major watersheds, each with its own physical characteristics, natural environments and patterns of development. All of the land area within the town eventually drains into the Kennebec River.
    [Show full text]
  • 109167-Moxiebro-12-Sc.Pdf
    e MAINE WILDERNESS OVERNIGHTS AND SUPER TRIPS O Overnight river trips are a wonderful way to explore the wild rivers of Maine. Two days of paddling and camping on the river. We start our adventure inflatable kayaking with rapids up to Class III. Your guides with give you pointers along the way, and before you know it you will be searching out waves to run and holes to surf. We stop for a lunch and a hike to one of the area waterfalls or swimming holes, and then we switch to our historic 10 person voyageur canoes to paddle to a remote camping site along the Kennebec River and Wyman Lake. Our riverside camp is set up so you can just relax, and enjoy the scenery, while your guides are preparing dinner. The stars at night are just spectacular from camp. Day two we raft on the exciting Class IV and V rapids of the Kennebec River Gorge. A steak/chicken barbecue is served riverside before we return to Lake Moxie Base Camp. This trip OutdoorOutdoor is all-inclusive: river and camping gear, shuttles and hearty meals optional Maine Lobster bake. Minimum group size required. Our Maine Super Trip is based out of Lake Moxie Camps in platform tents and includes all of the above plus a floatplane AdventuresAdventures Moose Safari! Cabin upgrades available. LOwer KennebeC infLatabLe KayaK “funyaKs” yageur Can yageur This very scenic 7-mile section of river with swift moving water up to class II is perfect for Funyaking. The rapids are easy and fun and the scenery is beautiful.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Breaching of the Edwards Dam, July 1, 1999 The Kennebec River is the third largest river in Maine consolidating the flows from many large lakes in north-central Maine, then flowing south through agricultural areas and small towns and cities of the central part of the state to merge with the Androscoggin River at Merrymeeting Bay. Introduction Geography The Kennebec River originates at Moosehead Lake flowing 145 miles to Merrymeeting Bay where it joins the Androscoggin River, then to the Atlantic Ocean at Phippsburg and Georgetown. The upper Kennebec flows from Moosehead Lake about 4 miles before reaching Indian Pond, the first of many impoundments. Flowing out of Indian Pond through Harris Dam, a major hydroelectric station, its passes through the Kennebec gorge then runs south draining into Wyman Lake, and through Wyman Dam, another large hydroelectric impoundment. From there it passes through urban and industrial areas of Madison, Skowhegan, Waterville-Winslow, and, with the Biomonitoring Retrospective 78 Maine DEPLW1999-26 Dec. 1999 removal of the Edwards Dam in Augusta in July, 1999, the Kennebec head of tide now occurs between Augusta and Sidney. The river eventually empties into Merrymeeting Bay in Richmond. Six major tributaries enter the river: the Moose River is the major tributary of Moosehead Lake, Dead River, Sandy River, Sebasticook River, Messalonskee Stream and Cobbosseecontee Stream. The basin covers approximately 5,893 square miles with approximately 3,850 miles of rivers and streams. Basin Summary Statistics Biomonitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States 1914 Part I
    U. 8, GFOL SURVEY H . HYO. RESEARCH ki A ^CITY, IOWA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 381 SURFACE WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES 1914 PART I. NORTH ATLANTIC SLOPE DRAINAGE BASINS NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer C. C. COVERT, C. H. PIERCE, and G. C. STEVENS, District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with the States of MAINE, VERMONT, MASSACHUSETTS, and NEW YORK WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 u. A «tUU SURVEY C/0 IOWA INST. HYD, RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR G1TY' I(WA FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 381 SDRFACE WATER SUPPLY OF THE UNITED STATES^*1 Geolosicil Survey, 1014 Box /r^] |_ PART I. NORTH ATLMTIC SLOPE ' NATHAN C. GROVER, Chief Hydraulic Engineer C. C. COVERT, C. H. PIERCE, and G. C. STEVENS, District Engineers Prepared in cooperation with the States of MAINE, VERMONT, MASSACHUSETTS, and NEW YORK WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 15 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Authorization and scope of work........................................... 7 Definition of terms......................................................... 8 Convenient equivalents.................................................... 9 Explanation of data........................................................ 11 Accuracy
    [Show full text]
  • Whitewater Boating Program
    Whitewater Boating Program 2020 Annual Warden Corporal Steve Allarie Report Whitewater Boating Specialist Whitewater Boating Program 2020 Annual Report on: Maine Warden Service Whitewater Boating Program Commercial Rafting Industry 130th Legislature – First Regular Session Dated: January 1, 2021 • In Maine, there are approximately 20 licensed Commercial Whitewater Outfitters providing whitewater boating trips among our6 Rapidly Flowing Rivers. The rivers include stretches of the upper Kennebec River, West Branch of the Penobscot River, South Branch of the Penobscot River, Dead River, Rapid River and the Magalloway River. • In Maine, the commercial whitewater industry provided professional services to approximately 24,639 commercial rafting passengers during the 2020 rafting season (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020). The low numbers reflect COVID-19 pandemic concerns and restrictions in early spring. The Commercial industry did not receive state approval to operate until the first week in June. The outfitters reported significant cancelations in the spring, which affected commercial numbers throughout the season. • The commercial whitewater rafting industry continues to be a tremendous economic asset to the State of Maine. The industry is complex and requires a significant investment of time by the Department to fulfill the responsibilities required by the State. In 1999, the Department hired a full-time Game Warden to work as a Whitewater Boating Specialist to enforce whitewater rafting rules and regulations and manage the administrative duties associated with the whitewater rafting industry. • Title 12, section 10259-B; states that all money from the Whitewater Rafting Fund shall be expended solely for purposes related to river recreation, with primary emphasis on those activities that relate to whitewater trips, including, but not limited to, administration, regulation, safety education, enforcement, mitigation of environmental and safety problems and mitigation of any adverse effect on competing use of the river.
    [Show full text]