DOCSLIB.ORG

Napster and Its Effects on the Music Industry: an Empirical Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Napster and Its Effects on the Music Industry: an Empirical Analysis Journal of Social Sciences 6 (3): 303-309, 2010 ISSN 1549-3652 © 2010 Science Publications Napster and its Effects on the Music Industry: An Empirical Analysis 1Patrick Mooney, 1Subarna Samanta and 2Ali H.M. Zadeh 1Department of Economics, College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA 2Department of Management, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA, 17870, USA Abstract: Problem statement: In the mid to late 1990s the rise of the internet has led to the development of Peer-to-Peer networks (P2P), which allows for increased and rapid connectivity between individuals and has made the transfer of information and files as simple as clicking a button. Approach: The ability to connect so easily has had its share of positive and negative effects on the music industry. Results: One potentially negative effect in particular has been the charge made by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), a trade group representing the music industry, that P2P networks have enabled individuals to effectively steal and share music, which is concomitant with decreasing CD sales. Still others claim that the availability of free music on applications such as Napster and Kazaa, among others, has actually helped the music industry by exposing individuals to artists they might not have otherwise become aware of. This study attempts to empirically identify and measure the effects of illegal downloading on CD sales and the music industry as a whole, using semi- annual time series data for the years 1990 through 2007. Conclusion/Recommendations: Our regression results showed that we cannot establish illegal downloading as the main culprit for decline in CD sales. There appears to be a number of factors driving down the sale of CDs, the largest of which is the sale of vinyl singles. The rise of legal online downloading since 2002 will also be accounted for the online electronic transfer and its effect on CD sales. Key words: Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks, illegal downloading, Napster, vinyl, regression INTRODUCTION recording artists individually and the music industry as a whole. It has also led to disputes over copyright The global economic climate has experienced infringement upon the rights of music artists. dramatic changes over the last two decades as a result Proponents of these types P2P networks (that facilitate of the personal computer and increased Internet music file sharing) claim that the ability to download connectivity. This rapid advancement of technology has music for free has had an innocuous effect on CD and created new business opportunities and allowed for vast paid electronic sales. Still others claim that the improvements in communication. Despite the multitude availability of free music on applications such as of positive effects being reaped from the internet, there Napster and Kazaa, among others, has actually helped also exist issues that have upset many people. In the the music industry by exposing individuals to artists mid to late 1990s the rise of the internet has led to the they might not have otherwise become aware of, or has development of Peer-to-Peer networks (P2P), which allowed sampling of music prior to purchase. The allows for increased and rapid connectivity between purpose of our research project is to identify the extent individuals and has made the transfer of information to which these P2P networks have contributed to the and files as simple as clicking a button. The ability to overall decline in CD sales and, also, to identify the connect so easily with masses of individuals has had its effects of enacted legislature against illegal file sharing share of positive and negative effects. One potentially and the increase in access to legal digital downloads negative effect, in particular, has led to much have helped curb this issue. The study is organized as controversies in our society: the Recording Industry follows: firstly this study briefly explains the nature of Association of America (RIAA, 2009), a trade group the recorded music industry and its history, the nature representing the music industry, has charged that P2P and function of P2P networks and legislation imposed networks have enabled individuals to effectively steal to protect intellectual property. Secondly this study and share music, leading to a significant reduction of briefly reviews the literature. In fourth part, this study CD sales and illegally appropriate the profits of details the hypotheses to be tested and discusses the Corresponding Author: Ali H.M. Zadeh, Department of Management, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA 17870, USA 303 J. Social Sci., 6 (3): 303-309, 2010 data and econometric methodology. In fifth part, this The digital revolution of the musical world study discusses empirical results and implications. appeared to happen very quickly. However, the music Finally conclusion is given. industry’s infrastructure and institutional legislation protecting the rights of the artists lagged far behind the A brief history of the recorded music industry: The innovative changes taking place. Before the record recorded music industry consists of several groups who companies could begin putting into place online are involved in the creation, recording and distribution marketplaces, others were already creating their own of music. In the nineteenth century, the music industry P2P software to share music free of charge. This was dominated by live music or the sale of sheet music. created the problematic issue of the P2P networks. The creation of the phonograph marked the Although the development of P2P networks has establishment of a new market: recorded music, which changed the climate of the internet and has led to some currently dominates the industry in this day and age. excellent innovations, however, these P2P networks The industry saw many changes over time, generally, as have also enabled online communities to connect and a result of technological innovation. Some of the groups illegally share copyrighted music without any payment involved in this industry include musicians, producers, to the artists. In order to understand the effects these A & R agents, publishers, labels and retail music stores. P2P networks can potentially have on the music However, for most of the later part of the 20th and into industry, it is important to first develop an the 21st century, the music industry consisted primarily understanding of how they function. (on the supply side) of two major groups. These groups P2P networks are online communities that are able are major record labels which are dominated by the to connect to one another’s computers to search, share “big four” record groups (Sony, BMG, EMI, Universal and download files. These P2P networks capabilities and Warner). The other group is comprised of smaller can easily be extended to movies, pictures and independent labels producing and distributing music on computer programs. A distinct characteristic separating a much smaller scale. These two groups spent a long P2P networks from other more traditional networks is period of time at odds with one another, but each the lack of a central server or client severs, but rather played an integral role in the industry’s development shared peer nodes which provide the bandwidth. Most and expansion. Independent labels boasted the ability to online business networks derive from a central server serve artists’ interests and not be part of the corporate where a client would initiate a download and the server “sell out” of major labels. They were able to spend time would react to satisfy the request. In most P2P networks break in new artists and genres creating and feeding the individual computers initiate downloads directly expanding demand for music. Major labels were able to from one another usually through host software. Thus, amass large quantities of capital that allowed them to as more users begin to use these P2P networks, their finance the recording process and expand to have global system capacity increases along with the number of distribution chains that served to feed global demand files available for sharing. for recorded music. Furthermore, labels are supposed to P2P networks, despite the fact that they pose a protect the intellectual property of their clients, threat to some industries, have been used to break new preventing piracy and unlicensed distribution. The ground in innovation and assisted in the distribution of 1980s led to most independent labels using major labels information. For example, many computer for their distribution and, therefore, independent labels programmers will make their programs and program came to serve the interests of major labels (Throsby, codes available on P2P networks for other individuals 2002). to test, adjust and improve the programs. Furthermore, P2P file sharing did not mark the first threat to the many colleges have become a part of online academic rights and profits of the music industry and the artists P2P networks that allow colleges and higher education they represent. The ability to copy tapes, burn CDs, or institutions to legally share files. The largest of these purchase pirated music from street vendors has long academic P2P networks is the Penn State’s LionShare. plagued the music industry. However, the burning of LionShare allows secure and legal file sharing of CDs and copying of tapes took place on a relatively academic content. Another attractive feature of small scale in comparison to the online sharing. The LionShare is its commitment to disclosure of the online climate of sharing allowed people all over the identity of sharing peers and movement away from world to access a person’s music library, where burning anonymous sharing. It is clear therefore why it is a CD would require one to know an individual who has important to understand how P2P networks function the music they want and who is generally in a very and facilitate illegal file sharing (Felix and Strumpf, close geographical proximity (Harrower, 2005). 2004).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Napster: Winning the Download Race in Europe
    Resolution 3.5 July/Aug 04 25/6/04 12:10 PM Page 50 business Napster: winning the download race in Europe A lot of ones and zeros have passed under the digital bridge on the information highway since November 2002, when this column reviewed fledgling legal music download services. Apple has proved there’s money to be made with iTunes music store, street-legal is no longer a novelty, major labels are no longer in the game ... but the Napster name remains. NIGEL JOPSON N RESOLUTION V1.5 Pressplay, co-owned by UK. There’s an all-you-can-download 7-day trial for Universal and Sony, received top marks for user UK residents who register at the Napster.co.uk site. Iexperience. Subscription service Pressplay launched While Apple has gone with individual song sales, with distribution partnerships from Microsoft’s MSN Roxio has stuck to the subscription model and service, Yahoo and Roxio. Roxio provided the CD skewed pricing accordingly. ‘We do regard burning technology. In November 2002, Roxio acquired subscription as the way forward for online music,’ the name and assets of the famed Napster service (which Leanne Sharman told me, ‘why pay £9.90 for 10 was in Chapter 11 protective bankruptcy) for US$5m songs when the same sum gives you unlimited access and 100,000 warrants in Roxio shares. Two months to over half a million tracks?’ earlier, Napster’s sale to Bertelsmann had been blocked Subscription services have come in for heavy — amid concerns the deal had not been done in good criticism from many informed commentators — mostly faith — this after Thomas Middlehoff had invested a multi-computer and iPod owning techno journalists like reputed US$60m of Bertelsmann’s money in Napster.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Music Labels in the Digital Era of Music: Live Concerts and Streaming Platforms
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLS\7-1\HLS101.txt unknown Seq: 1 28-MAR-16 12:46 Financing Music Labels in the Digital Era of Music: Live Concerts and Streaming Platforms Loren Shokes* In the age of iPods, YouTube, Spotify, social media, and countless numbers of apps, anyone with a computer or smartphone readily has access to millions of hours of music. Despite the ever-increasing ease of delivering music to consumers, the recording industry has fallen victim to “the disease of free.”1 When digital music was first introduced in the late 1990s, indus- try experts and insiders postulated that it would parallel the introduction and eventual mainstream acceptance of the compact disc (CD). When CDs became publicly available in 1982,2 the music industry experienced an un- precedented boost in sales as consumers, en masse, traded in their vinyl records and cassette tapes for sleek new compact discs.3 However, the intro- duction of MP3 players and digital music files had the opposite effect and the recording industry has struggled to monetize and profit from the digital revolution.4 The birth of the file sharing website Napster5 in 1999 was the start of a sharp downhill turn for record labels and artists.6 Rather than pay * J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School, Class of 2017. 1 See David Goldman, Music’s Lost Decade: Sales Cut in Half, CNN Money (Feb. 3, 2010), available at http://money.cnn.com/2010/02/02/news/companies/napster_ music_industry/. 2 See The Digital Era, Recording History: The History of Recording Technology, available at http://www.recording-history.org/HTML/musicbiz7.php (last visited July 28, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Recorded Music Since Napster: Evidence Based on The
    Digitization and the Music Industry Joel Waldfogel Conference on the Economics of Information and Communication Technologies Paris, October 5-6, 2012 Copyright Protection, Technological Change, and the Quality of New Products: Evidence from Recorded Music since Napster AND And the Bands Played On: Digital Disintermediation and the Quality of New Recorded Music Intro – assuring flow of creative works • Appropriability – may beget creative works – depends on both law and technology • IP rights are monopolies granted to provide incentives for creation – Harms and benefits • Recent technological changes may have altered the balance – First, file sharing makes it harder to appropriate revenue… …and revenue has plunged RIAA Total Value of US Shipments, 1994-2009 16000 14000 12000 10000 total 8000 digital $ millions physical 6000 4000 2000 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Ensuing Research • Mostly a kerfuffle about whether file sharing cannibalizes sales • Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf (2006),Rob and Waldfogel (2006), Blackburn (2004), Zentner (2006), and more • Most believe that file sharing reduces sales • …and this has led to calls for strengthening IP protection My Epiphany • Revenue reduction, interesting for producers, is not the most interesting question • Instead: will flow of new products continue? • We should worry about both consumers and producers Industry view: the sky is falling • IFPI: “Music is an investment-intensive business… Very few sectors have a comparable proportion of sales
    [Show full text]
  • AT&T MOBILE MUSIC: Take Control of Your Music
    AT&T MOBILE MUSIC: Take Control of Your Music AT&T Mobile Music is the only service that lets you bring subscription music services to your wireless phone, and it offers the largest collection of mobile music content available today from leading music retailers, such as Napster, Yahoo!® Music and eMusic. Designed to deliver “your music, your way,” AT&T Mobile Music puts you in touch with all things music directly from the handset. Available on select handsets, such as the Samsung a717 and a727, AT&T Mobile Music is the ultimate mobile music experience and provides one-click access to a complete suite of music-related content. Music Player Rip music from your CD collection, load it to your phone and select handsets, or play tracks that are accessible from digital music stores. You’ll need a data cable, memory card and stereo headset to fully rock your phone. Shop Music Show your style by downloading ringtones and Answer Tones™. Buy tracks from leading digital music stores, such as Napster, Yahoo! Music and eMusic on select handsets. Streaming Music When you need a change from your music, dozens of commercial-free channels stream the latest tunes in rock, hip-hop, jazz, Latin and other favorites. Add XM Radio or MobiRadio for $8.99 a month. Music Video With an AT&T 3G phone, you can watch your favorite music videos anytime, anywhere. The dancing, the amazing effects, the hot hits — all in the palm of your hand. MusicID “Who sings this?” “What’s this song called?” Know in a flash just by holding up your phone to the music.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Napster, Beyond the United States: the Technological and International Legal Barriers to On-Line Copyright Enforcement
    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 46 Issue 1 Judge Jon. O. Newman: A Symposium Celebrating his Thirty Years on the Federal Article 10 Bench January 2003 BEYOND NAPSTER, BEYOND THE UNITED STATES: THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BARRIERS TO ON-LINE COPYRIGHT ENFORCEMENT Jeffrey L. Dodes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Communications Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Litigation Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey L. Dodes, BEYOND NAPSTER, BEYOND THE UNITED STATES: THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BARRIERS TO ON-LINE COPYRIGHT ENFORCEMENT, 46 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. (2002-2003). This Note is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. \\server05\productn\N\NLR\46-1-2\NLR102.txt unknown Seq: 1 11-FEB-03 13:48 BEYOND NAPSTER, BEYOND THE UNITED STATES: THE TECHNOLOGICAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BARRIERS TO ON-LINE COPYRIGHT ENFORCEMENT I. INTRODUCTION Courts in the United States and throughout the world are faced with great challenges in adjudicating legal conflicts created by the rapid development of digital technologies. The proliferation of new technologies that allow for fast, reliable and widespread transmission of digital files has recently created a swell of litigation and media cover- age throughout the world. Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • To Stream, to Spend, Or to Steal? Alexa Koch University
    RUNNING HEAD: THE DIGITALIZATION OF MUSIC 1 The Digitalization of Music: To Stream, To Spend, or To Steal? Alexa Koch University of Miami RUNNING HEAD: THE DIGITALIZATION OF MUSIC 2 Abstract A music-streaming format delivers audio files or radio waves on a continuous basis, often through a subscription or verified user account. Streaming can be hosted traditionally, on a computer or Internet-enabled device, or via Bluetooth or other connectivity technology. Today, audio streaming accounts for almost one-third of the music industry; this forces record labels, organizations, and legislators, amongst others, to question the role played by music pirates in an industry so dominated by technological means of transmission. Critics suggest that there may be a link between streaming and piracy, such that the former enables the latter and that the two can coexist in a world dominated by music- streaming services. This link might exist within, and be more prevalent within, certain demographics, such as male millennials, but there is no evidence that all music streamers and paid subscribers. Keywords: music streaming, P2P file-sharing, music piracy, sound culture RUNNING HEAD: THE DIGITALIZATION OF MUSIC 3 The Digitalization of Music: To Stream, To Spend, or To Steal? Introduction Music streaming continues to grow, a force to be reckoned with, even as the rise in sales of vinyl has gone up in the last few years. Total revenue from all streaming services, which includes both passive and active streaming media, surpassed that of paid downloads by $1 million last year (Rosenblatt, 2016). According to the Recording Industry Association of America’s (RIAA) 2016 Mid-Year Report on Music Shipment and Revenue Statistics, streaming music revenues from the first half of 2016 totaled $1.6 billion, “up 57% year-over-year, and accounted for 47% of industry revenues compared with 32% [in the first half of 2015],” a figure that includes revenues from subscription services, streaming radio services, and non-subscription on-demand services.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: P2P Networks for Content Sharing
    Title: P2P Networks for Content Sharing Authors: Choon Hoong Ding, Sarana Nutanong, and Rajkumar Buyya Grid Computing and Distributed Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia (chd, sarana, raj)@cs.mu.oz.au ABSTRACT Peer-to-peer (P2P) technologies have been widely used for content sharing, popularly called “file-swapping” networks. This chapter gives a broad overview of content sharing P2P technologies. It starts with the fundamental concept of P2P computing followed by the analysis of network topologies used in peer-to-peer systems. Next, three milestone peer-to-peer technologies: Napster, Gnutella, and Fasttrack are explored in details, and they are finally concluded with the comparison table in the last section. 1. INTRODUCTION Peer-to-peer (P2P) content sharing has been an astonishingly successful P2P application on the Internet. P2P has gained tremendous public attention from Napster, the system supporting music sharing on the Web. It is a new emerging, interesting research technology and a promising product base. Intel P2P working group gave the definition of P2P as "The sharing of computer resources and services by direct exchange between systems". This thus gives P2P systems two main key characteristics: • Scalability: there is no algorithmic, or technical limitation of the size of the system, e.g. the complexity of the system should be somewhat constant regardless of number of nodes in the system. • Reliability: The malfunction on any given node will not effect the whole system (or maybe even any other nodes). File sharing network like Gnutella is a good example of scalability and reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Napster Case: the Whole World Is Listening, 15 Transnat'l Law
    Global Business & Development Law Journal Volume 15 Issue 2 Symposium: Beyond Napster -- The Future of Article 7 the Digital Commons 1-1-2002 The aN pster Case: The Whole World is Listening Grace J. Bergen General Counsel for MTS, Inc. d/b/a Tower Records Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/globe Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Grace J. Bergen, The Napster Case: The Whole World is Listening, 15 Transnat'l Law. 259 (2002). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/globe/vol15/iss2/7 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global Business & Development Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Napster Case: The Whole World is Listening Grace J. Bergen* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION: IS NAPSTER DEAD? ................................... 260 A. Napsterand Its Progeny ......................................... 260 B. The Recording Industry Dilemma ................................. 261 1I. BACKGROUND OF THE NAPSTER DECISION ............................. 261 A. The District CourtDecision ...................................... 261 1. Napster's "Safe Harbor"Arguments .......................... 262 2. Napster's FairUse Arguments ................................ 263 i. Works on NapsterAre Not "Transformative".............. 263 ii. Negative Economic Impact...............................
    [Show full text]
  • It's Really Important That You Think About How We Can Move
    “ It’s really important that you think about how we can move faster, how we can do things better, and not be satisfied that just because we did it in the way we used to do it, that we should Daniel Ek continue to do it so ” lv Co-Founder and CEO of Spotify Summary Daniel Ek is co-founder and CEO of the online music service Spotify. The Anglo-Swedish company launched to subscribers in 2008, and by 2011 had some 10 million registered users. It boasts former Facebook president Sean Parker as one of its board members. As with any internet business, it’s hard to put a value on Spotify, but estimates hover around the $1 billion mark, despite the fact that it’s not yet in profit. Among the factors behind Spotify’s rapid growth are timing, technical excellence, a business model that has managed to attract more than 2.5 million paying subscribers plus revenues from advertising, and a passion for continuous innovation and improvement. Spotify 104 Timeline Profile 2006 Daniel Ek and Martin Daniel Ek started to develop Spotify in 2006, together with fellow Lorentzon start to develop Spotify Swede Martin Lorentzon. Both had previous experience of setting 2008 Spotify launches for up internet businesses but Spotify was something bigger and public access more ambitious. They wanted to change the way people listened 2009 The service becomes to music, and to offer a legal and more convenient alternative to available on the App Store, and launches music piracy. on iPhone and Android Ek and Lorentzon launched Spotify in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Mechanical Sources Songtrust
    Global Mechanical Sources 2018 Songtrust optimizes global collection from streaming services and other sources of mechanical royalties. Below is a selection of common revenue sources. Songtrust continues to grow and develop its collection network ​ ​ and provide this global service to its clients and partners. Anyone who owes you or your writers mechanical royalties can process payments through Songtrust. Spotify KODA Legacy Productions Apple Music Rdio Virgin America Apple iTunes Smule Grooveshark Amazon Wimp Music Channel 4 YouTube VEVO Sprint Mobile Google Play Ingrooves National'nyj Tsifrovoj Agregator Tidal MediaNet BT VISION SUBSC Microsoft PFIVE Entertainment Mexico BEAT A/S Microsoft Groove PLR NETWORKS, LLC TDC A/S - PLAY XBox BUMA STEMRA FNAC Deezer 7Digital Euromediashack BeatPort LOVE FILM Premium Elite Slacker Nokia Library Ideas MixRadio Bell Mobility Inc. Playnet MySpace IMATCH Real Networks Napster Editores Mexicanos De Musica IMVU YouSee Play A.C. VIDZONE Harry Fox Agency Tdc A/s - Play BIBZOOM Music Reports Livewire ONMOBILE Mood Media Legacy Productions Incorporated Neurotic Media LLC Sony BEAT A/S PlayNetwork MixRadio EMusic Clear Channel Universal AMI Entertainment Discover Rhapsody Music Choice TDC A/S Lyricfind Limelight HOOPLA MCPS Rogers Packetvideo METROPCS STIM Headline Entertainment YONDER MUSIC CMRRA Zuus OSA SGAE BLINKBOX AOL AMCOS MUVE MUSIC STEINWAY, INC. SACM Cricket Ediciones Clippers ACUM YANDEX BT VISION LIMIT TEOSTO Tellus Mobility Labels SUISA Omnifone Distribution Companies NCB Stingray Music CONTACT Songtrust Founded in 2010 by Downtown Music Publishing CEO, Justin HQ: Soho, New York City Kalifowitz, Songtrust has been named a "Top Music Startup" by 485 Broadway, 3rd Floor ​ Billboard, and now powers the publishing administration technology New York, NY 10013 www.songtrust.com for CD Baby Pro, The Orchard, Downtown Music Publishing, and over E.
    [Show full text]
  • 31295019800852.Pdf (1.481Mb)
    IMPACT OF PAY-FOR-PLAY DOWNLOADING ON THE MUSIC INDUSTRY by James Robert Law A SENIOR THESIS in GENERAL STUDIES Submitted to the General Studies Council in the College of Arts and Sciences at Texas Tech University in Partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of BACHELOR OF GENERAL STUDIES Approved BLOOD Choo~~~~s~~ unications of Thesis Committee ~- THOMAS HUGHES School o-f Visual and Performing Arts Accepted DR. ~MICHAEL SCHOENECKE Director of General Studies MAY 2005 -r3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ^ooS ,,-) < I would like to thank Dr. Youngblood and Dr. Hughes CxO.c^ for their incredible assistance and patience. Your help is much appreciated, and I could not have finished this without the incredible amount of time and energy you both put forth. I would like to consider you both not only valuable mentors in my life, but also friends. I would like to thank my girlfriend, Michele Stephens, for her incredible encouragement that motivated me when I was so near completion. Thank you for understanding my one-track mind. Thanks for letting me talk out my ideas with you to solidify them. Finally, thanks to my mother, whose support I will always appreciate. Her prayers and concerns were always felt and well received. Without the sacrifices she made, I would not have had the time or the wits to finish this. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. TECHNOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 3 What Is the MP3 File Format 3 What Is a Peer-to-Peer Network 5 What Makes a Download Legal/Illegal 7 What Is a Pay-for-Play Downloading Program...
    [Show full text]
  • Essay the Evolution and Revolution
    Essay The Evolution and Revolution of Napster* By PETER JAN HONIGSBERG** As I TURNED the corner onto Seventh Street from Mission Street in San Francisco on that Monday morning, October 1, 2000, I knew I was watching history unfold. The satellite dishes, the neon-bright lights set atop the media vans, and members of the press fidgeting anxiously had replaced the homeless who usually encamp near the main en- trance to the Federal Court of Appeals building. As many as two hun- dred members of the national and international media had arrived that day, some as early as 4:15 A.M., although the music industry's law- suit against Napster was scheduled to begin at 11:00 A.M.I A television reporter was interviewing a balding man in a blue striped suit, the artificial lamps barely making a dent in the gray, dull natural light. I. Piracy-the Word of the Day While I watched the reporters lining up at the door to the court- house, I could not help but see the "P" word flashing overhead. The five major record companies ("the majors") and the Recording Indus- try Association of America ("RIAA")-the association that represents the companies-had paid their publicity agents and lawyers well. Piracy was the word of the day. Actually, at least where Napster was concerned, it was the word of the entire millennium year of 2000, and continued to be the word after the Ninth Circuit issued its unanimous * Just like the technology upon which this essay is based, the essay itself will be out of date the moment the typing stops.
    [Show full text]