DOCSLIB.ORG

Value Chain Analysis of the Wood Processing Industry in the Philippines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Israel, Danilo C; Bunao, David Feliks M. Working Paper Value chain analysis of the wood processing industry in the Philippines PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2017-05 Provided in Cooperation with: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Philippines Suggested Citation: Israel, Danilo C; Bunao, David Feliks M. (2017) : Value chain analysis of the wood processing industry in the Philippines, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2017-05, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Quezon City This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/173582 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Philippine Institute for Development Studies Surian sa mga Pag-aaral Pangkaunlaran ng Pilipinas Value Chain Analysis of the Wood Processing Industry in the Philippines Danilo C. Israel and David Feliks M. Bunao DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES NO. 2017-05 The PIDS Discussion Paper Series constitutes studies that are preliminary and subject to further revisions. They are being circulated in a limited number of copies only for purposes of soliciting comments and suggestions for further refinements. The studies under the Series are unedited and unreviewed. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute. Not for quotation without permission from the author(s) and the Institute. February 2017 For comments, suggestions or further inquiries please contact: The Research Information Staff, Philippine Institute for Development Studies 18th Floor, Three Cyberpod Centris – North Tower, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, 1100 Quezon City, Philippines Tel Nos: (63-2) 3721291 and 3721292; E-mail: [email protected] Or visit our website at http://www.pids.gov.ph Value Chain Analysis of the Wood Processing Industry in the Philippines Danilo C. Israel and David Feliks M. Bunao Abstract Wood processing is an important downstream activity of the forestry sector of the Philippines because it adds economic value to log, diversifies the products that can be produced from it, and increases the incomes and employment of involved communities. Despite its many economic contributions, however, the wood processing industry has been on the decline for many years now. This study analyzed the wood processing industry concentrating on its value chain, the major issues and problems it is facing, and the recommend actions to address the problems and issues. Among others, the study found that the wood processing industry is constrained by various technical, financial, economic, marketing, environmental, institutional, and research- related problems and issues. To address these individually, specific recommendations were put forward. In terms of research, in particular, the study suggested the gathering of more detailed and complete data and information on the wood processing sector by relevant government agencies and the conduct on relevant studies not just the whole processing sector but also on specific wood processing activities. Keywords: Philippines, CARAGA region, wood processing, value chain, problems and issues Value Chain Analysis of the Wood Processing Industry in the Philippines Danilo C. Israel and David Feliks M. Bunao1 I. Introduction Wood processing2 is an important downstream activity of the forestry sector because it adds economic value to log, diversifies the products that can be produced from it, and increases the incomes and employment of involved communities. The total national income and employment from wood processing are not known with certainty but in the log producing CARAGA Region (Region 13), alone, the wood processing industry directly employed close to 10,000 workers, mostly in the Agusan provinces (Paqueo and Silfverberg 2016). This employment does not include those in the upward and forward linkages of the industry such as the thousands of tree growers and workers in tree plantations and those involved in the marketing of wood products. Despite its economic contributions, however, the wood processing industry of the Philippines has been on the decline for many years now. Of late, a perceived reason behind this is the imposition of Executive Order (EO) 23 or total log ban. Issued in February 2011, this order declared an indefinite moratorium on the cutting and harvesting of timber in the natural and residual forests. With the implementation of this EO, the number of wood processing firms in the country fell. In the case of the Caraga region, it went down from 119 firms in 2010 to only 27 firms in 2015. There is no study that looked in detail into the value chain in the wood processing industry in the Philippines, identify the major and current issues and problems it is facing, and recommend specific actions to address them. In this light, this paper a) reviews the relevant foreign and domestic literature on wood processing; b) discusses the wood processing value chain in the Philippines; c) analyzes its economic performance in the last ten years; d) identifies the various issues and problems constraining its development; and e) recommends specific policies and other actions that can be undertaken to address them. This paper hopes to contribute to the sparse literature on the wood processing industry in the country and its more effective development in the coming years. The study uses primary data and information sourced through key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with related private sector and government stakeholders and secondary data and information from published and unpublished records of private and government institutions. 1 The authors are Senior Research Fellow and Research Analyst II of the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). 2Official Philippine statistics has no definition of wood processing. A wood processing plant is described as a mechanical device, machine, combination of machines or set-up used for the treatment of poles and piles or conversion of logs, and other wood raw materials into lumber, veneer, plywood, wallboard, blockboard, paperboard, pulp, paper or other finished wood products. (PFS 2014). The other available and official definitions relevant to wood processing are provided in the Appendix. II. Review of related literature International studies on wood processing There have been a number of country-specific studies conducted on wood processing in other countries3. Palus et al. (2015) studied the trade performance and competitiveness of the wood processing industry of the Slovak Republic vis-à-vis neighboring countries using 2003-2012 data from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Forest Products Statistics (FPS). Among others, the study found that the Slovak wood processing industry has a comparative advantage in coniferous and non-coniferous sawn wood, and paper and paperboard products and a comparative disadvantage in wood based panels and pulp wood. It also has an increasing trend in comparative advantage until 2008 when the trend started to decline due to an economic crisis. FAO (2013) looked into the wood processing industry in the Congo Basin using data gathered from four workshops organized from September 2010 to June 2011 in Cameroon, Congo. Firstly, the study asserted that there should be a firm political will and favorable business environment for wood processing investors. Secondly, security of land tenure, clear guidelines on sustainable level of forest extraction, and access to financial services should exist to ensure that businesses will continue to invest in wood processing. Thirdly, there should be buildup of profitable formal markets through the promotion of wood. Lastly, a structured wood processing industry value chain should be created. The study further recommended that government, with the help of business organizations, should integrate various industries including big and small- scale businesses should be tied-up and the informal sector of the wood processing should be convened. Putzel et al. (2012) assessed the wood processing industry in the province of Binh Dinh, Vietnam by interviewing 21 private companies and forestry department officials. The study suggested that the national government should provide attention to smallholders in Vietnam. Also, efforts should be made to promote the segmentation of the supply chains for woodchips and timbers for furniture at the plantation level. There
Recommended publications
  • Mean Annual Volume Increment of Selected Industrial Species

    Mean Annual Volume Increment of Selected Industrial Species

    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Plantations Thematic Papers MEAN ANNUAL VOLUME INCREMENT OF SELECTED INDUSTRIAL FOREST PLANTATION SPECIES Based on the work of Luis Ugalde and Osvaldo Pérez Consultants Edited by D. J. Mead April 2001 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FP/1 Forest Resources Division FAO, Rome (Italy) Forestry Department 2 Disclaimer The Forest Plantation Thematic Papers report on issues and activities in forest plantations as prepared for FRA 2000. These working papers do not reflect any official position of FAO. Please refer to the FAO website (http://www.fao.org/forestry) for official information. The purpose of these papers is to provide early information on on-going activities and programmes, and to stimulate discussion. Comments and feedback are welcome. For further information please contact: Mr. Jim Carle, Senior Forestry Officer (Plantations and Protection), Forest Resources Development Service Forest Resources Division Forestry Department FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla I-00100 Rome (Italy) e-mail: [email protected] For quotation: FAO (2001). Mean annual volume increment of selected industrial forest plantation species by L Ugalde & O Pérez. Forest Plantation Thematic Papers, Working Paper 1. Forest Resources Development Service, Forest Resources Division. FAO, Rome (unpublished). 3 ABSTRACT This paper provides a global overview of forest plantation growth rates, with a particular focus on mean annual volume increment (MAI) of the main species planted in developing countries. Documented growth data from both trials and plantations is presented, and the difficulty of translating trial data to commercial scale is highlighted. The main technical issues and pitfalls relating to MAI measurement and the preparation and growth models used are included.
  • Tree Care Handbook

    Tree Care Handbook

    Minnesota SWCD Forestry Association Tree Handbook Dear Tree Planter. With headlines reporting the continuing deforestation of the tropical rain forest, one may ask the question: Are America’s forests in danger of disappearing? Because people such as yourself practice reforestation, our forested acres are actually growing in size. About one-third of the United States, or 731 million acres is covered with trees. That’s about 70 percent of the forest that existed when Columbus discovered America. Almost one third of this is set aside in permanent parks and wilderness areas. Minnesotans’ have planted an average of 12 million trees annually; enough trees to cover over 15,000 acres per year. Good land stewards are planting trees for many good reasons. The results of their efforts can be seen in reduced soil erosion, improved air and water quality, healthy forest industries, enhanced wildlife habitat and generally a more attractive surrounding for us to live in. Aspen has become the most prominent tree in Minnesota’s forests. After clearcutting, aspen regenerates readily by sprouting from its root system or by drifting seeds onto disturbed sites. Most of the other major species in Minnesota need some help from tree planters to ensure that they make up a part of the new forest. The following pages will help explain how to plant and care for a tree seedling. There is a section on the general characteristics and planting requirements of the tree and shrub species commonly planted for conservation purposes in Minnesota. The professionals working in conservation throughout Minnesota thank you for planting, nurturing and wisely using one of Minnesota’s greatest treasures its renewable trees.
  • Code of Practice for Wood Processing Facilities (Sawmills & Lumberyards)

    Code of Practice for Wood Processing Facilities (Sawmills & Lumberyards)

    CODE OF PRACTICE FOR WOOD PROCESSING FACILITIES (SAWMILLS & LUMBERYARDS) Version 2 January 2012 Guyana Forestry Commission Table of Contents FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Wood Processing................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Development of the Code ................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Scope of the Code ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Objectives of the Code ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Implementation of the Code ............................................................................................................. 10 2.0 PRE-SAWMILLING RECOMMENDATIONS. ............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Market Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 General ..........................................................................................................................................
  • Sustainability Report for Georgia's Forests

    Sustainability Report for Georgia's Forests

    Executive Summary Georgia’s forests are being sustainably managed to meet the numerous needs of our state today. To ensure our forests will continue to meet the needs of present generations and the projected demands for future generations, many challenges must be addressed. Forest sustainability is dependent on both environmental and economic sustainability. A challenge to either element is a challenge to both elements. Success will depend on proactive decisions by our state leaders and the entire forestry and conservation communities addressing a myriad of forestry-related issues. Georgia boasts more than 24 million acres of forestland. Georgia’s forest inventory volumes are at an all-time high. We have 49 percent more cubic feet of wood growing in Georgia than we did 40 years ago. However, the state’s population is increasing at a record rate. Urbanization continues to be a threat to forest sustainability. Further, recent increases in population and changing land-use patterns have made ongoing forest management more difficult in some areas of the state. These and other trends threaten forest sustainability and the numerous economic, environmental, and social benefits that our forests provide. This report describes both forestland (all forests including those not available for commercial harvest – 24.6 million acres) and timberland (all forests that are available for commercial harvest – 23.9 million acres). (GFC 2016) Georgia’s forest area has remained stable over the past 50 years at about 24 million acres. Approximately 91 percent of this acreage is privately owned, giving Georgia more privately-owned acres of timberland than any other state in the nation.
  • Regulation on Forest Products Processing and Marketing

    Regulation on Forest Products Processing and Marketing

    Forestry Development Authority Regulation No. 112-08 Regulation on the Forest Products Processing and Marketing WHEREAS, the National Forestry Reform Law of 2006 establishes a transparent framework, for the use, management and protection of forest resources that balances the commercial, community, and conservation priorities of the Republic; and WHEREAS, the economic potential of processed wood products has not been appreciated, there has been too much exportation of crude round logs with evidence of low percentage of primary processed wood for both domestic and export market, no value-added wood product, low recovery rate of wood processing industry, problem of waste disposal; and WHEREAS, industrialization of the wood industry in general and the processing of wood into secondary/value-added products in particular are essential elements for the realization of the potential sustainable utilization of Liberia‘s forest resources; and WHEREAS, sustainable utilization of forest resources concept is not only to maintain the value of forest resources, but rather it also has a huge potential for creating employment, income and wealth for the Liberia populations; and WHEREAS, local small-scale wood enterprises are not fully capacitated and unregulated which in essence has resulted into unsustainable use and marketing of wood products, wastage of wood products, constant exposure of wood products to deteriorating agents; and WHEREAS, the lack of standard units of measurement for Liberia domestic wood market and unregulated import of wood products,
  • Urban Wood and Traditional Wood

    Urban Wood and Traditional Wood

    FNR-490-W AGEXTENSIONRICULTURE Authors Daniel L. Cassens, Professor of Wood Products and Extension Urban Wood and Traditional Wood: Specialist, Purdue University Edith Makra, Chairman, A Comparison of Properties and Uses Illinois Emerald Ash Borer Wood Utilization Team Trees are cultivated in public and private wood. This publication describes some key landscapes in and around cities and differences between wood products from towns. They are grown for the tremendous traditional forests and those available from contributions they make both to the urban forests. Because the urban wood environment and the quality of people’s lives. industry is emerging and the knowledge In this urban forest, trees must be removed base is still sparse, conclusions drawn in the when they die or for reasons of health, safety, publication are based on knowledge of urban or necessary changes in the landscape. The forestry and of the traditional forest products wood from these felled landscape trees industry. could potentially be salvaged and used to manufacture wood products, but not in the Forest Management same way as forest-grown trees. Traditional forests are either managed specifically to produce commodity wood or The traditional forest products industry is to meet stewardship objectives compatible based on forest-grown trees; its markets with responsible harvesting, such as for and systems don’t readily adapt to this new watershed and wildlife. Harvesting is source of urban wood. The urban forest typically done in accordance with long-term grows different trees in a different manner forest management plans that sustain forest than the traditional forest, and the wood health and suit landowner objectives.
  • Wood As a Sustainable Building Material Robert H

    Wood As a Sustainable Building Material Robert H

    CHAPTER 1 Wood as a Sustainable Building Material Robert H. Falk, Research General Engineer Few building materials possess the environmental benefits of wood. It is not only our most widely used building mate- Contents rial but also one with characteristics that make it suitable Wood as a Green Building Material 1–1 for a wide range of applications. As described in the many Embodied Energy 1–1 chapters of this handbook, efficient, durable, and useful wood products produced from trees can range from a mini- Carbon Impact 1–2 mally processed log at a log-home building site to a highly Sustainability 1–3 processed and highly engineered wood composite manufac- tured in a large production facility. Forest Certification Programs 1–3 As with any resource, we want to ensure that our raw ma- Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) 1–4 terials are produced and used in a sustainable fashion. One Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) 1–4 of the greatest attributes of wood is that it is a renewable resource. If sustainable forest management and harvesting American Tree Farm System (ATFS) 1–4 practices are followed, our wood resource will be available Canadian Standards Association (CSA) 1–5 indefinitely. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) Schemes 1–5 Wood as a Green Building Material Over the past decade, the concept of green building1 has Additional Information 1–5 become more mainstream and the public is becoming aware Literature Cited 1–5 of the potential environmental benefits of this alternative to conventional construction. Much of the focus of green building is on reducing a building’s energy consumption (such as better insulation, more efficient appliances and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems) and reducing negative human health impacts (such as con- trolled ventilation and humidity to reduce mold growth).
  • Energy Efficiency Measures in the Wood Manufacturing Industry

    Energy Efficiency Measures in the Wood Manufacturing Industry

    Energy Efficiency Measures in the Wood Manufacturing Industry B. Gopalakrishnan, A. Mate, Y. Mardikar, D.P. Gupta and R.W. Plummer, West Virginia University, Industrial Assessment Center B. Anderson, West Virginia University, Division of Forestry ABSTRACT The objectives of the research are to examine the energy utilization profile of the wood manufacturing industry with respect to system level production parameters and investigate the viability of specific energy efficiency measures. The Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) has conducted energy assessments in the wood manufacturing industrial sector in the State for several years. The energy utilization profile of several wood processing facilities is analyzed and reported. The production system parameters in terms of throughput and nature of manufacturing operations are examined in relation to the overall energy utilization, specific energy consumption, and potential for implementation of energy efficiency measures (EEM). Introduction Energy management is the application of engineering principles to the control of energy costs at a facility. It is a continuous process that requires consistent efforts for identifying potential areas for conservation, formulation of proposals and implementation. There are many energy efficient technologies and practices, both currently available and under development, that could save energy if adopted by industry. Energy and energy management have been in the limelight in various manufacturing and service operations across the industries in the US. Although large quantities of wood are utilized as fuel, pulpwood, and railroad ties, lumber is by far the most important form in which wood is used. In the US, the volume of wood converted into lumber exceeds the volume used for all other purposes.
  • Cost-Efficient Production in the Wood- Working and Wood Processing

    Cost-Efficient Production in the Wood- Working and Wood Processing

    Cost-efficient production in the wood- working and wood processing industry Source: Homag Group AG The production processes in your industry are as varied as the natural raw material, wood. Machines with innovative automation technology bring about crucial cost advantages here. Benefit from a competitive advantage Festo’s core business includes applied automation technology for a wide variety of machines, from entry- level to fully automated high-end ones. A key technological feature of our solutions is pneumatics as a sturdy and low-cost medium. It has long established itself as the standard for primary woodworking and secondary wood processing in wood-based products technology, sawing or planing technology as well as in production machines and plants for furniture production, the components industry and carpentry and joinery. Discover new dimensions for your company. We will help you to achieve your goals, because cost optimisation, maximum productivity, global presence and close partnerships with our customers are the hallmarks of Festo. Source: Homag Group AG Large number of standard products suitable for the working space and resistant to dust and chips Complemented by an industry-specific product offer and application-optimised solutions Global network of specialists for on-site support Consistent quality of products and services – worldwide Long-term, reliable partnership You have high standards, we ensure you meet them The company nobilia with around 3,000 employees production, it supplies almost one in three kitchens has been exclusively producing its products in sold throughout Germany, employing a high level Germany for 70 years. The two plants in Verl in of automation to guarantee a constant level of East Westphalia are among the most modern and quality.
  • Proceedings of the 9Th International Christmas Tree Research & Extension Conference

    Proceedings of the 9Th International Christmas Tree Research & Extension Conference

    Proceedings of the 9th International Christmas Tree Research & Extension Conference September 13–18, 2009 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ John Hart, Chal Landgren, and Gary Chastagner (eds.) Title Proceedings of the 9th International Christmas Tree Research & Extension Conference IUFRO Working Unit 2.02.09—Christmas Trees Corvallis, Oregon and Puyallup, Washington, September 13–18, 2009 Held by Oregon State University, Washington State University, and Pacific Northwest Christmas Tree Growers’ Association Editors John Hart Chal Landgren Gary Chastagner Compilation by Teresa Welch, Wild Iris Communications, Corvallis, OR Citation Hart, J., Landgren, C., and Chastagner, G. (eds.). 2010. Proceedings of the 9th International Christmas Tree Research and Extension Conference. Corvallis, OR and Puyallup, WA. Fair use This publication may be reproduced or used in its entirety for noncommercial purposes. Foreword The 9th International Christmas Tree Research and Extension Conference returned to the Pacific Northwest in 2009. OSU and WSU cohosted the conference, which was attended by 42 Christmas tree professionals representing most of the major production areas in North America and Europe. This conference was the most recent in the following sequence: Date Host Location Country October 1987 Washington State University Puyallup, Washington USA August 1989 Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon USA October 1992 Oregon State University Silver Falls, Oregon USA September 1997
  • Rexroth for Woodworking Machinery

    Rexroth for Woodworking Machinery

    Industrial Electric Drives Linear Motion and Service Mobile Hydraulics and Controls Assembly Technologies Pneumatics Automation Hydraulics Rexroth for woodworking machinery The Drive & Control Company From rough timber to the finished product: Drive, control and move with Rexroth Whether it’s forestry, sawmills or furniture production – the requirements of the wood industry facing both man and machine are more demanding than in virtually any other branch of industry. In order to overcome the com- petition, many factors must work together in perfect excellence. Higher material throughput, better exploitation of material, greater flexibility and low processing tolerances are what the market demands from modern, eco - nomical concepts for wood processing and woodworking. And hardly any provider can satisfy the expectations of machine manufacturers like Rexroth does: through branch-specific application expertise, innovative products and the philosophy of offering not just individual components but, above all, system solutions that incorporate numerous technologies. These solutions include powerful components and systems, which themselves work reliably under the toughest conditions, but also innovative techniques for achieving high productivity coupled with maximum flexibility. Rexroth offers the woodworking and wood-processing industries convincing answers to practically all questions about drive, motion and control technology. More speed thanks to dynamic, electrohydraulic positioning systems, highly dynamic linear motors and linear guides and high-speed spindle drives and recirculating ball screws. More precision thanks to high-precision electric, hydraulic and pneumatic motion axes – precisely guided by profile rail guides and optionally equipped with pneumatic or hydraulic weight compensation. More safety for man and machine through electric drive technology with integral, certified safety func- tions.
  • Understanding Key Issues of Sustainable Wood Production in the Pacific Northwest

    Understanding Key Issues of Sustainable Wood Production in the Pacific Northwest

    United States Department of Agriculture Understanding Key Issues of Forest Service Sustainable Wood Production Pacific Northwest Research Station in the Pacific Northwest General Technical Report PNW-GTR-626 January 2005 The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W. Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. EDITORS Robert L. Deal is a research forester and Seth M. White is a science writer- editor, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Focused Science Delivery Program, 620 SW Main St., Suite 400, Portland, OR 97205. White is also a graduate student in the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife at Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331.