Physics 721, Fall 2005 Josh Erlich Problem Set 1: the Dirac Equation Due Thursday, September 8
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Physics 721, Fall 2005 Josh Erlich Problem Set 1: The Dirac Equation Due Thursday, September 8 1. Lorentz transformation of products of Dirac spinors Under a Lorentz transformation, ª(x) S(¤)ª(x); ! where the matrix S(¤) satis¯es, 1 1 ¹ ¹ º S¡ = γ0 Sy γ0; S¡ γ S = ¤ º γ : In class we demonstrated that ªª is a Lorentz scalar, and ªγ¹ª is a Lorentz 4-vector. a.) Show that ªγ¹1 γ¹n ª transforms as a Lorentz tensor of rank n. ¢ ¢ ¢ b.) Show that (ªγ¹1 γ¹n1 ª) (ªγº1 γºn2 ª) transforms as a Lorentz ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ tensor of rank n1 + n2. Hence, even though the γ¹ are just matrices and do not transform under Lorentz transformations, the transformation properties of spinor bilinears (and products of spinor bilinears) are what you would expect if you were to think of γ¹ as a 4-vector. Always keep in mind that it is really ª(x) that is transforming, not γ¹. 2. Free particle solutions to the Dirac equation In class we found plane wave solutions to the Dirac equation in the Weyl basis for particles moving in the z^-direction with arbitrary helicity (spin along the direction of motion). The positive helicity solution was, pE p3 0 ¡ 1 B 0 C p B C : ª( ) = B 3 C B pE + p C B C B C @ 0 A Since the helicity operator commutes with rotations, a helicity eigenstate corresponding to a particle moving in an arbitrary direction can be ob- tained by applying two rotations to the state above. 1 What is the positive helicity plane wave solution to the Dirac equation cor- responding to a particle moving with momentum p in a direction de¯ned by (θ; Á) in the usual polar coordinates? 3. Weyl and Majorana fermions In the Weyl representation, the gamma matrices are, i 0 0 1 0 σ γ = 0 1 ; γi = 0 1 : 1 0 σi 0 @ A @ ¡ A a.) Show that the gamma matrices in the Weyl representation satisfy the Cli®ord algebra, γ¹; γº = 2´¹º. f g b.) Write the 4-component Dirac spinor as, à ª = 0 L 1 ; @ ÃR A where ÃL and ÃR each have two components and are called Weyl spinors. Write the Dirac equation, (ih¹ @ mc)ª = 0 in terms of ÃL and ÃR. 6 ¡ c.) Show that if m = 0 then the Dirac equation decomposes into indepen- dent equations for ÃL and ÃR. d.) Dirac argued that a spinor satisfying the Dirac equation cannot have two components because the four matrices ¯ and ®i must mutually anticommute, and there are only three independent Hermitian anti- commuting 2 2 matrices σi. £ If m = 0 then you derived an equation for the two-component spinor ÃL. How did you get around Dirac's apparent need for a four-component object? e.) Consider an alternative equation (the Majorana equation) for a two- component spinor  which transforms as the top two components of the Dirac spinor (ÃL) in the Weyl basis: ¹ 2 ih¹ σ @¹Â imcσ ¤ = 0; ¡ where σ¹ = (1; σi). ¡ 2 Show that each component of  satis¯es the Klein-Gordon equation, 2 ¹ 2 2 h¹ @¹@  = m c Â: ¡ f.) Show that the Majorana equation is relativistically invariant. A two-component spinor satisfying this equation is called a Majorana spinor. Neutrinos may be Majorana spinor ¯elds satisfying an equa- tion of this type. 3.