Obsidian Studies in the Truckee Meadows, Nevada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Obsidian Studies in the Truckee Meadows, Nevada REPORTS 151 Obsidian Studies in the Truckee population movements. For example, in a land­ Meadows, Nevada mark study of obsidian procurement patterns in northeastern California and south-central Oregon, JAMES HUTCHEVS and DWIGHT D. Hughes (1986) established that the identified obsid­ SIMONS ian sources represented are more numerous and Kautz Environmental Consultants, Inc., 5200 Neil Rd., more distant in skes characterized by temporally Suite 200, Reno, NV 89502. diagnostic EUco series projectile points than in skes dated to earlier or later periods. The Truckee Meadows is a well-watered val­ The relative abundance of obsidian from diverse ley in western Nevada with archaeological evi­ and distant sources provided the basis for suggest­ dence of aboriginal human occupation extend­ ing that the obsidian was procured indkectly by ex­ ing fi-om 150 B.P. to about 10,000 B.P. Obsid­ change through an extensive obsidian trade net­ ian samples from 27 archaeological sites in and around the Truckee Meadows (401 individual work which flourished during Elko times, but was specimens) have been analyzed for geochemical less expansive at other times (Hughes 1986). source determination, and 183 of these obsidian Using similar data, diachronic variability in rela­ specimens have been analyzed for hydration rind thicknesses. A total of 20 different obsid­ tive abundance of obsidian from diverse and distant ian sources in seven distinct geographic locali­ sources at skes in Drews Valley in south-central ties is represented in the combined obsidian Oregon has been explained by shifting settlement samples. Despite this great diversity, 46% of patterns and population movements of people who the sample obsidian was derived from local sources, while 38% was derived from the Mono are assumed to have procured their obsidian direct­ Basin in southeast California. The remainder of ly at the sources, rather than indirectly through ex­ the sample obsidian (16%) was derived from change (Connolly and Jenkins 1997). sources scattered throughout northeast Califor­ nia and northwest Nevada, as well as from sev­ A number of obsidian studies has been conduct­ eral unidentified sources. No temporal trends ed ki the Tmckee Meadows, producing specific ob­ or shifts in the utilization of particular obsidian sidian source information for 363 specimens, as sources are apparent in the sample. Hydration weU as 183 hydration rind measurements. This re­ rind thicknesses vary from 0.8 p to 9.8 p, but the data for Sutro Springs obsidian suggest that hy­ port synthesizes the results of these studies in order dration rind thickness is an unreliable tech­ to characterize the obsidian data recovered from nique for determining the age of obsidian arti­ sites wkhin and around the Tmckee Meadows. In facts, whether relative or absolute. the foUowing sections, we provide a brief overview of the Tmckee Meadows, present a summary of the currently available obsidian data, and discuss ap­ DURING the last two decades, obsidian studies parent trends in the data. have become increasingly important in the archae­ THE TRUCKEE MEADOWS ology of far westem North America, especially in northem and central California (see Taylor 1976 The Tmckee Meadows (Figs. 1 and 2) is named Earle and Ericson 1977; Ericson and Earle 1982 for the Tmckee River, which flows through the Hughes 1982, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1989, 1994 valley from west to east, takkig water from Lake Hughes and Bettkiger 1984; Hughes and Benny- Tahoe to Pyramid Lake (Glancy et al. 1984; Gates hofifl986; Jackson 1986, 1988; Whiteet al. 1993; and Walters 1992). It is one of several well- Baugh and Ericson 1994). Many obsidian studies watered, lushly vegetated valleys located along the have provided the foundations for archaeological east front of the northem Sierra Nevada. The inferences regarding dynamics of prehistoric land Truckee Meadows is approxknately 19 km. (12 use, patterns of frade and exchange, ethnicity, and mi.) north/south by 16 km. (10 mi.) east/west, and 152 JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA AND GREAT BASIN ANTHROPOLOGY Fig. 1. Location of the Tmckee Meadows in westem Nevada. is bounded on the west by the Carson Range, (completed ki 1868) followed the Truckee River whose highest point is Mount Rose (3,285 m. through the Truckee Meadows, promoting the ini­ [10,776 ft.]). To the north is Peavine Mountain tial growth of the cities of Reno and Sparks along (2,519 m. [8,266 ft.]), surrounded by lower hills. the river. The eastem boundary of the Truckee Meadows Prehistoric human occupancy of the Tmckee basin is formed by the Virgkiia Range, which has Meadows and envkons appears to have begun a number of peaks above 6,000 ft. (1,830 m.), such about 10,000 B.P. with the pre-Archaic Period as Louse Peak (2,092 m. [6,862 ft.]). The Steam­ Washoe Lake Phase, represented by isolated finds boat HUls at the southern aid of the Truckee Mead­ of fluted pokits (Elston 1986; Elston et al. 1994, ows have a maxknum elevation of 1,883 m. (6,178 1995). Great Baski Stemmed series pokits typify ft.). The floor of the Tmckee Meadows has an aver­ the subsequent Tahoe Reach Phase, which lasted age elevation of 1,372 m. (4,500 ft.). Spanish from ca. 10,000 to 8,000 B.P. The Spooner Phase Springs VaUey and Lemmon VaUey lie knmediately (8,000 to 5,000 B.P.) marks the Early Archaic north of the Tmckee Meadows, while Pleasant Val­ Period, durkig which adaptive sfrategies kivolvkig ley and Washoe Valley are situated to the south. less mobility and more kitensive reliance upon The route of the historic Cenfral Pacific Raikoad plant foods and small game began to emerge. REPORTS 153 SP.-OflSH SPRINGS VALLEY KEY H HulTiktr Hllll 1 26W.65 2 26WJ2211 3 26WE58«3 4 26Wi3017 5 2«W«5190 6 26Wa5I86 7 26W.5I83 8 26Wi5204 9 26W.3197 and 26Wt520S 10 26Wil450 M MWi4331 i: :6Wi4330 13 26Wil4a8/14<9 14 26Wa4319 IS 26Wa5949 16 26W13944 17 26W.5897 IS 26Wa59U 19 26Wa2016 :o 26W,5K3 PLEASANT :i :6WJ2014 22 :6Wa5929 VALLEY 23 26Wa59:4 Slide Mtn. 24 26Wi99 25 26W11414 ' Washoe 26 26Wa2(U8 ro Lake r^-dS^ Fig. 2. Archaeological sites contributing to obsidian studies. A dramatic kicrease ki archaeological visibility the bow and arrow; an apparent preference for characterizes the Middle Archaic Period Martis chert (i.e., cryptocrystallkie silicates) toolstone; re­ Phase (5,000 to 1,300 B.P.). It is distinguished by duction ki tool size; possible reduction ki house a weU-developed biface reduction trajectory, char­ size; kifroduction of bedrock mortars and hullers as acterized by Martis series and Elko series dart a consequence of the development of the acom/pki- points, and a variety of bifaces, retouched flakes, yon complexes; and establishment of more perma­ and perforators/gravers, often made from basak nent, established whiter base camps (Elston 1986; (Elston 1986; Elsasser and Gortiier 1991). A Elston et al. 1995). The Late Archaic Period is plethora of Martis Phase sites occurs, often con- divided kito two temporal phases. Rosegate series tainmg associated features such as houses, cache and Gunther series projectile pokits are typical of pks, and hearths. The frequent presence of sub­ the Early Kkigs Beach Phase (1,300 to 700 B.P.). stantial quantities of ground stone artifacts at Mar­ These are replaced durkig the Late Kings Beach tis Phase sites, especially manos and metates/mill- Phase (700 to 150 B.P.) by Desert series pokits. kig stones, attests to the knportance of plant foods. The Late Kings Beach Phase cokicides with the The subsequent Late Archaic Period is marked Terminal Archaic Period defined for the westem by a number of cultural changes: kifroduction of Great Baski ki general. It has been argued that the 154 JOURNAL OF CALIFORNIA AND GREAT BASIN ANTHROPOLOGY Table 1 OBSIDIAN SOURCES IN THE COMBINED SAMPLE Geographic Area Obsidian Source* No. of Specimens % of Total Truckee Meadows Sutro Springs 148 36.9 C. B. Concrete 37 9.2 Patrick 0 0.0 Mono Basin Bodie Hills 79 19.7 Mount Hicks 53 13.2 Pine Grove Hills 16 4.0 Casa Diablo 2 0.5 Queen 1 0.25 Northwest Nevada Fox Mountain 6 1.5 Homecamp A B 4 1.0 Majuba Mountain 3 0.75 Duck Flat 2 0.5 Paradise Valley 0.25 Warner Mountains South Warners 4 1.0 Buck Mountain 0.25 Sugar Hill 0.25 ledicine Lake Highlands East Medicine Lake 0.25 Grasshopper Flat/ Lost Iron Wells 0.25 North Coast Ranges Mount Konocti 0.25 Napa Valley 0.25 Sacramento Valley Tuscan 0.25 multiple areas unidentified sources 38 9.5 ALL SOURCES 401 100 " Source determinations were performed by Geochemical Research Laboratory or by Biosystems Analysis, Inc. Hydration rind thicknesses were measured by the Obsidian Hydration Laboratory at the Anthropological Studies Center, Sonoma State University, or by Biosystems Analysis, Inc. Late Archaic peoples kihabitkig the Truckee Mead­ (1996), Delacorte (1997), Hutchins et al. (1997a, ows and environs were the ancestors of the ethno- 1997b), Sknons (1997a, 1997b), and Mires and historic and present-day Washoe, for whom the HutchuB (1998). Many of the obsidian specimens Tmckee Meadows was (and is) part of their core were also analyzed to measure hydration rind territory (e.g.. Price 1962, 1980; Downs 1966; thicknesses. The combined resuks of obsidian d'Azevedo 1986; Elston etal. 1994, 1995). source determinations are summarized ki Table 1. A total of 20 different obsidian sources from OBSIDLVN STUDIES seven distinct geographic localkies was identified Obsidian samples from 27 sites within and from the samples. Obsidian was derived from around the Truckee Meadows have been analyzed sources as far north as Sugar Hill (160 mi.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain
    Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain, Co-Ordinator TrailSafe Nevada 1285 Baring Blvd. Sparks, NV 89434 [email protected] Nev. Dept. of Cons. & Natural Resources | NV.gov | Governor Brian Sandoval | Nev. Maps NEVADA STATE PARKS http://parks.nv.gov/parks/parks-by-name/ Beaver Dam State Park Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park Big Bend of the Colorado State Recreation Area Cathedral Gorge State Park Cave Lake State Park Dayton State Park Echo Canyon State Park Elgin Schoolhouse State Historic Site Fort Churchill State Historic Park Kershaw-Ryan State Park Lahontan State Recreation Area Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park Sand Harbor Spooner Backcountry Cave Rock Mormon Station State Historic Park Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort State Historic Park Rye Patch State Recreation Area South Fork State Recreation Area Spring Mountain Ranch State Park Spring Valley State Park Valley of Fire State Park Ward Charcoal Ovens State Historic Park Washoe Lake State Park Wild Horse State Recreation Area A SOURCE OF INFORMATION http://www.nvtrailmaps.com/ Great Basin Institute 16750 Mt. Rose Hwy. Reno, NV 89511 Phone: 775.674.5475 Fax: 775.674.5499 NEVADA TRAILS Top Searched Trails: Jumbo Grade Logandale Trails Hunter Lake Trail Whites Canyon route Prison Hill 1 TOURISM AND TRAVEL GUIDES – ALL ONLINE http://travelnevada.com/travel-guides/ For instance: Rides, Scenic Byways, Indian Territory, skiing, museums, Highway 50, Silver Trails, Lake Tahoe, Carson Valley, Eastern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southeast95 Adventure, I 80 and I50 NEVADA SCENIC BYWAYS Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 Is a Mountainous, Deeply Dissected, and Westerly Tilting Fault Block
    5 . S i e r r a N e v a d a Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 is a mountainous, deeply dissected, and westerly tilting fault block. It is largely composed of granitic rocks that are lithologically distinct from the sedimentary rocks of the Klamath Mountains (78) and the volcanic rocks of the Cascades (4). A Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, Vegas, Reno, and Carson City areas. Most of the state is internally drained and lies Literature Cited: high fault scarp divides the Sierra Nevada (5) from the Northern Basin and Range (80) and Central Basin and Range (13) to the 2 2 . A r i z o n a / N e w M e x i c o P l a t e a u east. Near this eastern fault scarp, the Sierra Nevada (5) reaches its highest elevations. Here, moraines, cirques, and small lakes and quantity of environmental resources. They are designed to serve as a spatial within the Great Basin; rivers in the southeast are part of the Colorado River system Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the Ecoregion 22 is a high dissected plateau underlain by horizontal beds of limestone, sandstone, and shale, cut by canyons, and United States (map): Washington, D.C., USFS, scale 1:7,500,000. are especially common and are products of Pleistocene alpine glaciation. Large areas are above timberline, including Mt. Whitney framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and those in the northeast drain to the Snake River.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Ed
    Spring 2019 WATERSHED ED Promoting watershed education and stewardship in Nevada STEM Education in Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak’s top priority is education, and the State’s STEM Advisory Council’s vision is that “every student in Nevada will have access and opportunities to experience a high-quality science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, with the ultimate objective that students are prepared to thrive in the New Nevada economy…” All schools are encouraged to adopt practices that engage and expose students to real-world problem solving, creative design, innovation, critical thinking, and career opportunities through STEM-focused formal and informal education. Schools in Nevada that meet the highest standards of STEM instruction are identified and recognized as STEM schools, as outlined in the Governor’s Designated STEM School Action Guide. Look Inside The Governor and his wife recently visited and 1 Stem Education in Nevada participated in Bordewich Bray Elementary School’s Family Science Night presented by Sierra Nevada 2 2019 Golden Pinecone Awards Journeys in Carson City. He spoke about how important education is to Nevada and how he was 3 Featured Watershed committed to supporting teachers, educators, students and families around the State. 4 NDOW Aquatic Fauna—Beaver It’s not just the schools that must recognize and 6 Science Career Highlight participate in the STEM experience. Families, businesses, industry and the community at large are 8 Opportunities/Events also encouraged to help drive STEM curriculum and experiences. 9 Resources/Contact (Continued on page 5) FEATURED Science Career Learn what it’s like to be a water quality scientist (see page 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Committee for the Review and Oversight of the TRPA and the Marlette Lake Water System
    STATE OF NEVADA Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Steve Sisolak, Governor Bradley Crowell, Director Charles Donohue, Administrator MEMORANDUM DATE: December 11, 2019 TO: Committee for the Review and Oversight of the TRPA and the Marlette Lake Water System THROUGH: Charles Donohue, Administrator FROM: Meredith Gosejohan, Tahoe Program Manger SUBJECT: California spotted owls in Nevada The following information on the California spotted owl in Nevada is in response to questions from the Committee during the meeting held on November 19, 2019. Currently, there is only one known nesting pair of spotted owls in the State of Nevada. The pair were discovered in Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park in 2015 and have occupied the same territory every year since. The territory is monitored annually by the Nevada Tahoe Resource Team’s (NTRT) biologist from the Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW). The pair has successfully fledged one juvenile from the nest in three different years: 2015, 2017, and 2018. There have also been five documented incidental spotted owl sightings in other parts of the Carson Range since 2015. These spotted owls are a subspecies called the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis). There are two other subspecies in the western United States (Northern and Mexican), both of which are federally listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The California spotted owl was recently petitioned for federal listing as well, but the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) announced in November 2019, that listing was not warranted at this time. (Click here to read the decisions summary) Spotted owls are native to the Tahoe Basin, though they have been relatively rare on the Nevada side and are typically observed on the California side or other parts of the Sierra Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip Summary Report for Sierra Nevadas, California: Chico NE, SE
    \ FIElD TRIP SUMMARY FOR SIERRA NEVADAS, CALIFORNIA CHICO NE, SE AND SACRAMENTO NE I. INTRODUCTION Field reconnaissance of the work area is an integral part for the accurate interpretation of aerial photography. Photographic signatures are compared to the actual wetland's appearance in the field by observing vegetation, soil and topo~raphy. This information is weighted with seasonality and conditIOns at both dates of photography and ground truthing. The project study area was located in northern California's Sierra Nevada Mountains. Ground truthing covered the area of each 1:100,000: Chico NE, Chico SE, and Sacramento NE. This field summary describes the data we were able to collect on the various wetland sites and the plant communities observed. II. FIELD MEMBERS Barbara Schuster Martel Laboratories, Inc. Dennis Peters U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service III. FIELD DATES July 27 - August 2, 1988 IV. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY Type: Color Infrared Transparencies Scale: 1:58,000 V. COLLATERAL DATA U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangles Soil Survey of HI Dorado Area. California, 1974. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Soil Survey of Nevada County Area. California, 1975. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. 1 Soil Survey of Sierra Valley Area. California. Parts of Sierra. Plumas. and Lassen Counties, 1975. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Soil Survey - Tahoe Basin Area. California and Nevada, 1974. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Soil Survey - Amador Area. California, 1965. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan O the Sky Highway T
    Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Highway to the Sky CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE & VISION PURPOSE & VISION 1 PLAN PURPOSE 2 CORRIDOR SETTING 3 VISION & GOALS 6 STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC OUTREACH 7 CHAPTER 2: MOUNT ROSE SCENIC BYWAY’S INTRINSIC VALUES INTRINSIC VALUES 19 TERRAIN 20 OWNERSHIP 22 LAND USE & COMMUNITY RESOURCES 24 VISUAL QUALITY 26 CULTURAL RESOURCES 30 RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 34 HYDROLOGY 40 VEGETATION COMMUNITIES & WILDLIFE 42 FUEL MANAGEMENT & FIRES 44 CHAPTER 3: THE HIGHWAY AS A TRANSPORTATION FACILITY TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 47 EXISTING ROADWAY CONFIGURATION 48 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES & TRENDS 49 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES 50 EXISTING BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 50 EXISTING TRAFFIC SAFETY 50 EXISTING PARKING AREAS 55 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 55 CHAPTER 4: ENHANCING THE BYWAY FOR VISITING, LIVING & DRIVING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES & ACTION ITEMS 57 PRESERVE THE SCENIC QUALITY & NATURAL RESOURCES 59 BALANCE RECREATION ACCESS WITH TRANSPORTATION 68 & SAFETY NEEDS CONNECT PEOPLE WITH THE CORRIDOR 86 PROMOTE TOURISM 94 CHAPTER 5: CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP CORRIDOR STEWARDSHIP 99 MANAGING PARTNERS 100 CURRENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS 102 | i This Plan was funded by an On Our Way grant from the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and a Federal Scenic Byway Grant from the Nevada Department of Transportation. ii | Mount Rose Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan CHAPTER ONE 1 PURPOSE & VISION Chapter One | 1 The Corridor PLAN PURPOSE The Mount Rose Scenic Byway is officially named the “Highway to the Management Sky” and offers travelers an exciting ascent over the Sierra Nevada from Plan identifies the sage-covered slopes of the eastern Sierra west to Lake Tahoe. Not only goals, objectives does the highway connect travelers to a variety of recreation destinations and cultural and natural resources along the Byway, it also serves as a and potential minor arterial connecting both tourists and commuters from Reno to Lake enhancements to Tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Truckee River 2007
    NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORT F-20-54 2018 TRUCKEE RIVER WESTERN REGION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT Table of Contents SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 3 PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................... 3 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................... 5 MANAGEMENT REVIEW ............................................................................................. 17 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 18 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT State: Nevada Project Title: Statewide Fisheries Program Job Title: Truckee River Period Covered: January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 SUMMARY On April 1, 2018, the designated end of the snow-measuring season, the snowpack in the Truckee River Basin stood at 75% of the median for that date and the amount of precipitation for the year stood at 90% of average. While the 2017/18 winter was slightly
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Plan
    CONSERVATION PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS City Council Robert Cashell, Mayor Pierre Hascheff, At-Large Dan Gustin, Ward One Sharon Zadra, Ward Two Jessica Sferrazza, Ward Three Dwight Dortch, Ward Four David Aiazzi, Ward Five Office of the City Manager Charles McNeely, City Manager Mary Hill, Assistant City Manager Susan Schlerf, Assistant City Manager Donna Dreska, Chief of Staff Planning Commission Jim Newberg, Chair Kevin Weiske, Vice Chair Doug Coffman Lisa Foster Dennis Romeo Jason Woosley Community Development Department John B. Hester, AICP, Community Development Director John Toth, P.E., Assistant Community Development Director Claudia Hanson, AICP, Deputy Community Development Director - Planning Nathan Gilbert, Associate Planner Amended by City Council October 22, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Plan Organization ............................................................................................1 Boundary .........................................................................................................1 Time Frame .....................................................................................................1 Relationship to Other Plans .............................................................................1 Need for Conservation Plan.............................................................................1 Truckee River...................................................................................................2 Development Constraints............................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Introduction
    Carson Range Fuel Reduction and Wildfire Prevention Strategy Section 1: Introduction Purpose of this Plan This comprehensive fuels reduction and wildfire prevention plan is a unified, multi-jurisdictional strategic synopsis of the planning efforts of local, county, state, tribal, and federal entities. The proposed projects in this plan provide a 10-year strategy to reduce the risk of large and destructive wildfire in the Carson Range planning area. The plan’s outcome is to 1) propose projects that create “community defensible space”, 2) comprehensively display all proposed fuel reduction treatments, and 3) facilitate communication and cooperation among those responsible for plan implementation. If implemented, this plan will provide greater protection to the people, infrastructure, and resources in the planning area. This plan was developed to comply with the White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-432 [H.R.6111]), which amended the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-263) to include the following language: “development and implementation of comprehensive, cost-effective, multi- jurisdictional hazardous fuels reduction and wildfire prevention plans (including sustainable biomass and biofuels energy development and production activities) for the Lake Tahoe Basin (to be developed in conjunction with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency), the Carson Range in Douglas and Washoe Counties and Carson City in the State, and the Spring Mountains in the State, that are-- (I) subject to approval by the Secretary; and (II) not more than 10 years in duration” This comprehensive plan is supported by 15 partners who each have a role in wildland fuels or fire management in the planning area (see “Agencies Involved” below).
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Fire Commissioners, Truckee Meadows Fire
    BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS TRUCKEE MEADOWS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TUESDAY 9:00 A.M. NOVEMBER 10, 2020 PRESENT: Bob Lucey, Chair Marsha Berkbigler, Vice Chair* Kitty Jung, Commissioner (via telephone) Vaughn Hartung, Commissioner Jeanne Herman, Commissioner Janis Galassini, County Clerk Charles Moore, Fire Chief David Watts-Vial, Deputy District Attorney (via Zoom) The Board convened at 9:00 a.m. in regular session in the Commission Chambers of the Washoe County Administration Complex, 1001 East Ninth Street, Reno, Nevada. Following the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our Country, the Clerk called the roll and the Board conducted the following business: 20-153F AGENDA ITEM 3 Public Comment. There was no response to the call for public comment. 20-154F AGENDA ITEM 4 Announcements/Reports. Truckee Meadows Fire Protection District Chief Charles Moore said green waste pile burning was slated to begin in December and would continue through January or February 2021. An announcement would soon be released regarding whether owners with large properties would be allowed to burn green waste on their land. Commissioner Hartung expressed appreciation for a letter of support for an advanced signal warning system to be installed near the intersection of Pyramid Highway and Calle de la Plata. An update was expected from the Nevada Department of Transportation regarding the possibility of installing systems along the entire Pyramid Highway corridor, as well as in the Mount Rose Highway area. Commissioner Hartung expressed a desire to work proactively on any potential safety issues. Commissioner Jung wondered whether a permit would be required for the open burning mentioned by Chief Moore and what the minimum acreage required for property owners to burn green waste on-site would need to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan
    Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan PREPARED BY SUSTAIN ENVIRONMENTAL INC FOR THE California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region December 2009 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE rptfic'iii Printed on sustainable paper products COVER: Appleton Utopia Forest Stewardship Council certified by Smartwood (a Rainforest Alliance program), ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, EPA SmartWay Transport Partner Interior pages: Navigator Hybrid 85%-100% recycled post consumer waste blended with virgin fiber, Forest Stewarship Council certified chain of custody, ISO 14001 Registered Environmental Management System, 80% energy from renewable resources Divider pages (main body): Domtar Colors Sustainable Forest Initiative fiber sourcing certified, 30% post consumer waste Divider pages (appendices): Hammermill Fore MP 30% post consumer waste PDF VERSION DESIGNED FOR DUPLEX PRINTING State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Sierra and Lassen Counties, California UPDATED: DECEMBER 2009 PREPARED FOR: California Department of Fish and Game North Central Region Headquarters 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Attention: Terri Weist 530.644.5980 PREPARED BY: Sustain Environmental Inc. 3104 "O" Street #164 Sacramento, California 95816 916.457.1856 APPRnvFn RY- Hallelujah Junction Wildlife Area Land Management Plan Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................i
    [Show full text]