What You Need to Know
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In the Privy Council on Appeal from the Court of Appeal of Pitcairn Islands
IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF PITCAIRN ISLANDS No. of 2004 BETWEEN STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN First Appellant LEN CALVIN DAVIS BROWN Second Appellant LEN CARLISLE BROWN Third Appellant DENNIS RAY CHRISTIAN Fourth Appellant CARLISLE TERRY YOUNG Fifth Appellant RANDALL KAY CHRISTIAN Sixth Appellant A N D THE QUEEN Respondent CASE FOR STEVENS RAYMOND CHRISTIAN AND LEN CARLISLE BROWN PETITIONERS' SOLICITORS: Alan Taylor & Co Solicitors - Privy Council Agents Mynott House, 14 Bowling Green Lane Clerkenwell, LONDON EC1R 0BD ATTENTION: Mr D J Moloney FACSIMILE NO: 020 7251 6222 TELEPHONE NO: 020 7251 3222 6 PART I - INTRODUCTION CHARGES The Appellants have been convicted in the Pitcairn Islands Supreme Court of the following: (a) Stevens Raymond Christian Charges (i) Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961 and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x4); (ii) Rape contrary to s14 of the Judicature Ordinance 1970 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956. Sentence 4 years imprisonment (b) Len Carlisle Brown Charges Rape contrary to s7 of the Judicature Ordinance 1961, the Judicature Ordinance 1970, and s1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (x2). Sentence 2 years imprisonment with leave to apply for home detention The sentences have been suspended and the Appellants remain on bail pending the determination of this appeal. HUMAN RIGHTS In relation to human rights issues, contrary to an earlier apparent concession by the Public Prosecutor that the Human Rights Act 1978 applied to the Pitcairn Islands, it would appear not to have been extended to them, at least in so far as the necessary protocols to the Convention have not been signed to enable Pitcairners to appear before the European Court: R (Quark Fisheries Ltd) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2005] 3 WLR 7 837 (Tab ). -
The Sexual Offences Act
LAWS OF KENYA The Sexual Offences Act NO 3 OF 2006 Revised Edition 2009 (2008) Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney General. 2 No. 3 of 2006 Sexual Offences Act Rev. 2009] THE SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT No. 3 of 2006 Date of Assent: 14th July, 2006 Date of Commencement: 21st July, 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1- Short title. 2- Interpretation. 3- Rape. 4- Attempted rape. 5- Sexual assault. 6- Compelled or induced indecent acts. 7- Acts which cause penetration or indecent acts committed within the view of a child or person with mental disabilities. 8- Defilement. 9- Attempted defilement. 10- Gang rape. 11- Indecent act with child or adult. 12- Promotion of sexual offences with a child. 13- Child trafficking. 14- Child sex tourism. 15- Child prostitution. 16- Child pornography. 17- Exploitation of prostitution. 18- Trafficking for sexual exploitation. 19- Prostitution of persons with mental disabilities. 20- Incest by male persons. 21- Incest by female persons. 22- Test of relationship. 23- Sexual harassment. 24- Sexual offences relating to position of authority and persons in position of trust. 25- Sexual relationship which pre-date position of authority or trust. 26- Deliberate transmission of HIV or any other life threatening sexually transmitted disease. 27- Administering a substance with intent. 28- Distribution of substance by juristic persons. 29- Cultural and religious sexual offences. 30- Non-disclosure of conviction of sexual offences. 31- Vulnerable witnesses. 32- Vulnerable witnesses to be notified of protective measures. 33- Evidence of surrounding circumstances and impact of sexual offence. Rev. -
PDF/Stern Review Acc FINAL.Pdf> Accessed 25Th January 2010, 12
Durham E-Theses The role of human rights in determining whether complainants of a sexual oence and/or defendants charged with an oence under the Sexual Oences Act 2003 should receive anonymity Taylor, Laura How to cite: Taylor, Laura (2014) The role of human rights in determining whether complainants of a sexual oence and/or defendants charged with an oence under the Sexual Oences Act 2003 should receive anonymity, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9477/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 1 The role of human rights in determining whether complainants of a sexual offence and/or defendants charged with an offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 should receive anonymity By Laura Emily Taylor ABSTRACT A 2010 proposal to extend anonymity in rape cases to rape defendants underlined the continuation of a long running, highly politicised debate, centred on whether one or both parties in a rape case should receive anonymity. -
Sexual Offences Act
MINISTRY OF THELAWS ATTORNEY OF TRINIDAD GENERAL AND AND LEGAL TOBAGO AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT CHAPTER 11:28 Act 27 of 1986 Amended by 20 of 1994 31 of 2000 12 of 2012 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1–23 .. UNOFFICIAL VERSION L.R.O. UPDATED TO 31ST DECEMBER 2016 MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALLAWS OF AND TRINIDAD LEGAL AFFAIRS AND TOBAGOwww.legalaffairs.gov.tt 2 Chap. 11:28 Sexual Offences Note on Subsidiary Legislation This Chapter contains no subsidiary legislation. UNOFFICIAL VERSION UPDATED TO 31ST DECEMBER 2016 MINISTRY OF THELAWS ATTORNEY OF TRINIDAD GENERAL AND AND LEGAL TOBAGO AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt Sexual Offences Chap. 11:28 3 CHAPTER 11:28 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. Act inconsistent with Constitution. 2. Interpretation. PART I OFFENCES AND THE PROSECUTION AND PUNISHMENT OF OFFENCES 3. Indictable offences. 4. Rape. 4A. Grievous sexual assault. 5. (Repealed by Act No. 31 of 2000). 6. to. (Repealed by Act No. 12 of 2012). 8. 9.} Incest. 10. (Repealed by Act No. 12 of 2012). 11. 12.} Sexual intercourse with mentally subnormal person. 12A. Power of arrest. 13. Buggery. 14. Bestiality. 15. Indecent assault. 16. Serious indecency. 17. Procuration. 18. Procuring defilement of a person. 19. Detention of a person. 20. Abduction of a female. 21. (Repealed by Act No. 12 of 2012). 22. Suppression of brothels. UNOFFICIAL VERSION L.R.O. UPDATED TO 31ST DECEMBER 2016 MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALLAWS OF AND TRINIDAD LEGAL AFFAIRS AND TOBAGOwww.legalaffairs.gov.tt 4 Chap. -
Mulvihill, N. (2019). Is It Time to Drop the Term 'Prostitution' from Policy Discourse? Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 3(
Mulvihill, N. (2019). Is it time to drop the term ‘prostitution’ from policy discourse? Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 3(3), 385-393. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868019X15682997312551 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1332/239868019X15682997312551 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Policy Press at https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/tpp/jgbv/2019/00000003/00000003/art00009 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Journal of Gender-Based Violence • vol xx • no xx • 1–9 • © Centre for Gender and Violence Research University of Bristol 2019 • Print ISSN 2398-6808 • Online ISSN 2398-6816 https://doi.org/10.1332/239868019X15682997312551 open space Is it time to drop the term ‘prostitution’ from policy discourse? Natasha Mulvihill, [email protected] University of Bristol, UK In this paper, I wish to explore whether it is time to drop the use of the term ‘prostitution’ in English policy discourse. I argue here that ‘prostitution’ is a culturally loaded term and is insufficiently precise in describing the different contexts in which the exchange of sex for money or other resources between adults takes place. This lack of clarity has implications for policy action, which in turn materially affects the lives of those involved in the sex industry. -
Prostitution Legislation and Human Trafficking
International Relations and Security Network ETH Zurich Leonhardshalde 21, LEH 8092 Zurich Switzerland ISN Special Issue January 2007 Prostitution legislation and human trafficking This month's newsletter focuses on prostitution legislation and human trafficking. In the last decade a few European countries have reformed their laws on prostitution. These reforms were initiated for various reasons and with differing outcomes, some of which are still being investigated while others have come under heavy criticism. In the case of the UK, the laws in question were old and outdated, and therefore needed to be adjusted to the changed societal circumstances. Since 2000, the UK Home Office, which is responsible for this issue, has continuously sought to improve the situation for both people working in the business, as well as communities and citizens suffering from its effects in every-day life. The motive behind Sweden's law reform had been to work toward the abolition of prostitution and to better protect the sex worker. The sex worker law that was subsequently introduced in 1999 defined the customer of sexual services as the offender of the law, whereas the sex worker was seen as the victim. Whether it was effective in terms of the well-being of the workers to clearly define their customers as law offenders has now come under heavy criticism. Many argued that prostitution in Sweden now takes place less openly and therefore is less controllable, which may make it even more dangerous for sex workers, since they are forced to work in a "legal vacuum." Additionally, it becomes very difficult for police and the state to control prostitution and to persecute law offenders under these conditions. -
Sexual Offences Act
LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MINISTRY OF LEGAL AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT CHAPTER 11:28 Act 27 of 1986 Amended by 20 of 1994 31 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1–25 .. 1/2006 L.R.O. 1/2006 UPDATED TO DECEMBER 31ST 2007 LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MINISTRY OF LEGAL AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt 2 Chap. 11:28 Sexual Offences Note on Subsidiary Legislation This Chapter contains no subsidiary legislation. UPDATED TO DECEMBER 31ST 2007 LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MINISTRY OF LEGAL AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt Sexual Offences Chap. 11:28 3 CHAPTER 11:28 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. Act inconsistent with Constitution. 2. Interpretation. PART I OFFENCES AND THE PROSECUTION AND PUNISHMENT OF OFFENCES 3. Indictable offences. 4. Rape. 4A. Grievous sexual assault. 5. (Repealed by Act No. 31 of 2000). 6. Sexual intercourse with female under fourteen years. 7. Sexual intercourse with female between fourteen and sixteen years. 8. Sexual intercourse with male under sixteen years. 9. Incest. 10. Sexual intercourse with adopted minor, etc. 11. Sexual intercourse with minor employee. 12. Sexual intercourse with mentally subnormal person. 12A. Power of arrest. 13. Buggery. 14. Bestiality. 15. Indecent assault. 16. Serious indecency. 17. Procuration. 18. Procuring defilement of a person. 19. Detention of a person. 20. Abduction of a female. 21. Householder, etc., permitting defilement of a minor under sixteen years of age. 22. Suppression of brothels. L.R.O. 1/2006 UPDATED TO DECEMBER 31ST 2007 LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MINISTRY OF LEGAL AFFAIRS www.legalaffairs.gov.tt 4 Chap. -
A Popular Version of the Sexual Offence Act 2006 a SIMPLIFIED VERSION of the SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2006
A popular version of the Sexual Offence Act 2006 A SIMPLIFIED VERSION OF THE SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 2006 A popular version of the Sexual Offences Act 2006 Contents Pages Foreword i Acknowledgments ii 1. Background and Evolution and purpose of the Act 1 2. Important features of the Act 2 3. Part One – Offences created by the Act 3 • Section 3 – Rape 3 • Section 4 – Attempted Rape 3 • Section 5- Sexual Assault 3 • Exceptions to a charge of sexual assault 3 • Section 8– Defilement 3 • Defences to the offence of defilement 4 • Exceptions to the defences to defilement 4 4. Section 9- Attempted defilement 4 5. Section 10- Gang rape 4 6. Section 11- Indecent Act 5 • Defences to a charge of committing an indecent act 5 7. Section 12- Promotion of a sexual offence with a child 5 8. Section 13-Child Trafficking 6 9. Section 14- Child sex Tourism 7 10. Section 15- Child Prostitution 7 11. Section 16- Child Pornography 8 • Publications and activities which do not amount to child pornography 9 12. Section 17- Exploitation of Prostitution 9 A popular version of the Sexual Offence Act 2006 13. Section 19- Prostitution of persons with mental disabilities 9 14. section 20- Incest 9 15. Section 23- Sexual harassment 10 16. Section 24- Sexual offences by persons in positions of authority or trust 10 17. Section 26- Deliberate transmission of HIV and other S.T.D’s 10 18. Section 27- Administering a substance with intent 11 19. Section -29- Cultural and religious offences 11 20. Part 2- Provisions relating to adducing evidence 12 21. -
Sexual Offences Act, 1956 4 & 5 Eliz
Sexual Offences Act, 1956 4 & 5 ELIz. 2 CH. 69 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I OFFENCES, AND THE PROSECUTION AND PUNISHMENT OF OFFENCES Intercourse by force, intimidation, etc. Section 1. Rape. 2. Procurement of woman by threats. 3. Procurement of woman by false pretences. 4. Administering drugs to obtain or facilitate intercourse. Intercourse with girls under sixteen 5. Intercourse with girl under thirteen. 6. Intercourse with girl between thirteen and sixteen. Intercourse with defectives 7. Intercourse with an idiot or imbecile. 8. Intercourse with defective. 9. Procurement of defective. Incest 10. Incest by a man. 11. Incest by a woman. Unnatural offences 12. Buggery. 13. Indecency between men. Assaults 14. Indecent assault on a woman. 15. Indecent assault on a man. 16. Assault with intent to commit buggery. CH. 69 Sexual Offences Act, 1956 4 & 5 ELiz. 2 Abduction Section 17. Abduction of woman by force or for the sake of her property. 18. Fraudulent abduction of heiress from parent or guardian. 19. Abduction of unmarried girl under eighteen from parent or guardian. 20. Abduction of unmarried girl under sixteen from parent or guardian. 21. Abduction of defective from parent or guardian. Prostitution, procuration, etc. 22. Causing prostitution of women. 23. Procuration of girl under twenty-one. 24. Detention of woman in brothel or other premises. 25. Permitting girl under thirteen to use premises for intercourse. 26. Permitting girl between thirteen and sixteen to use premises for intercourse. 27. Permitting defective to use premises for intercourse. 28. Causing or encouraging prostitution of, intercourse with, or indecent assault on, girl under sixteen. -
Documenting Human Rights Violations of Sex Workers in Kenya
Documenting Human Rights Violations of Sex Workers i n K e n y a a Documenting Human Rights Violations of Sex Workers in Kenya A study conducted in Nairobi, Kisumu, Busia, Nanyuki, Mombasa and Malindi Supported by a Grant from the Open Society Institute © FIDA Kenya, 2008 Published by FIDA Kenya Designed & printed by Noel Creative Media Ltd Acknowledgements FIDA Kenya expresses its appreciation to the lead researcher Catherine Muyeka Mumma and our assistant MaryFrances Lukera for undertaking the in-depth research, whose findings form this report. We appreciate the following organisations for their tremendous contribution to successful completion of this study: Family Health Options Kenya, Kisumu AIDS Self Help Group, Women in Fishing Industry Program, Likii HIV/AIDS Home Based Care, Solidarity with Women in Distress, Solidarity with Girls in Distress, International Center for Reproductive Health, and Ganjoni Municipal Clinic. We sincerely thank the Office of the Police Commissioner and, in particular, the Director of Community Policing, Gender and Child Protection for mobilizing police officers for the purposes of this research. We also recognise the individual police officers who took part in the focus group discussion for their invaluable input. We are grateful to the sex workers who participated in focus groups and agreed to have individual interviews. We would also like to thank Penina Wanjiku, Triza Achieng, Tom Odhiambo, Jostina Wanjiku, Violet Kanyanga, Elizabeth Akinyi, Agnes Mailu, Claudette Jolebo, Dr. Geoffrey Lutta, and Dr. Lou Dierick for their support and mobilization of the respondents. We recognise the invaluable insights of Hon. Njoki Ndung’u, the Attorney General’s office, Kenya Law Reform Commission and the Judiciary and sincerely thank them for their support. -
The Parole Board for England and Wales Guidance to Members On
The Parole Board for England and Wales Guidance to members on LASPO Act 2012 – test for release Revised Guidance – December 2013 LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) NEW SENTENCES AND TESTS FOR RELEASE This Act came into force on 3 December 2012. The significant changes that affect the Parole Board are: 1. Abolition of the IPP/EPP 2. Introduction of a new extended determinate sentence (EDS) 3. Change in the test for release for existing DCR, 1967 and ‘old style’ extended sentence cases 4. Power given to the Secretary of State to change the release test by statutory instrument 5. Arrangements for determinate recalls 6. New automatic life sentence 1. ABOLITION OF THE IPP/EPP Anyone convicted (the date the offence was committed is immaterial) on or after 3 December 2012 will not be eligible for an IPP or EPP. Existing IPP prisoners’ status is unaffected. 2. EDS (Extended Determinate Sentence) Section 124 of LASPO creates the EDS by inserting a new section 224A into the 2003 Act. Schedule 18 of LASPO inserts a new Schedule 15B into the 2003 Act. Schedule 15B (attached at Annex A) lists 44 offences of the more serious kind. The longer list of specified offences still exists under Schedule 15 (attached at Annex B). An EDS will be imposed on an offender who, if over 18: • where he is convicted of a Schedule 15 offence on or after 3 December 2012 (regardless of when the offence was committed); and • is adjudged to present a significant risk to the public of serious harm; and • is not suitable for a life sentence; and either • he has a previous conviction for a Schedule 15B offence or • if the court was minded to impose an extended sentence, the custodial would be at least 4 years. -
Download 495 Kb
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS In the Dudgeon case, The European Court of Human Rights, taking its decision in plenary session in application of Rule 48 of the Rules of Court and composed of the following judges: Mr. R. RYSSDAL, President, Mr. M. ZEKIA, Mr. J. CREMONA, Mr. THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON, Mr. W. GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH, Mrs. D. BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT, Mr. D. EVRIGENIS, Mr. G. LAGERGREN, Mr. L. LIESCH, Mr. F. GÖLCÜKLÜ, Mr. F. MATSCHER, Mr. J. PINHEIRO FARINHA, Mr. E. GARCIA DE ENTERRIA, Mr. L.-E. PETTITI, Mr. B. WALSH, Sir Vincent EVANS, Mr. R. MACDONALD, Mr. C. RUSSO, Mr. R. BERNHARDT, and also Mr. M.-A. EISSEN, Registrar, and Mr. H. PETZOLD, Deputy Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 24 and 25 April and from 21 to 23 September 1981, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The Dudgeon case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission"). The case originated in an application against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission on 22 May 1976 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by a United Kingdom citizen, Mr. Jeffrey Dudgeon. 2. The Commission's request was lodged with the registry of the Court on 18 July 1980, within the period of three months laid down by Articles 32 par. 1 and 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47). The request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art.