A Haptic Archaeology of the English Cathedral Dead
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Handling the dead: a haptic archaeology of the English Cathedral dead Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Nugent, Ruth Citation Nugent, R. (2015). Handling the dead: a haptic archaeology of the English Cathedral dead. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Download date 09/10/2021 13:18:30 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/620390 Handling the Dead: A Haptic Archaeology of the English Cathedral Dead Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Chester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ruth Helen Nugent October 2015 Abstract This thesis takes a longue dureé approach to the manifold ways in which those engaging with English cathedrals have been able to physically interact with the bodies, burials, and monuments of the dead. Three themes are explored to that effect: Haptic Experiences, Haptic Interactions, and Haptic Connections. Haptic Experiences takes a fresh, nuanced look at the evolution of English shrine architecture in relation to tensions between the sight and touch of pilgrims. Haptic Interactions employs new and different data surveyed from monuments within five cathedral interiors: historic graffiti, iconoclastic damage, and haptic erosion and staining. This is explored through a lens of touch as a component of early modern masculinities. Haptic Connections explores the presencing of the absent and displaced dead through touch and bodiliness of both the living and the dead in the (late) modern cathedral. Such an approach requires a multi-strand methodology, harnessing archaeological and documentary evidence, and multiple datasets. This allows the thesis to examine both period-specific practices and recurring themes of touch and emotion, identity, and re-connection which have been central to haptic explorations of the dead in past and present incarnations of the English cathedral. Contents Chapter 1: Introduction: In Touch with the Dead p.1 Chapter 2: Cathedral Mortuaryscapes p.47 Chapter 3: Haptic Approaches to the Dead p.82 Chapter 4: Haptic Experiences of the Saints p.118 Chapter 5: Haptic Interventions with the Dead p.192 Chapter 6: Haptic Connections between the Displaced Dead p.310 Chapter 7: Conclusion p.395 Bibliography p.416 Appendix 1: Gazetteer of the Five Cathedrals CD-ROM Appendix 2: Cathedral Monument Database CD-ROM Appendix 3: Tomb Openings in the 18th and 19th Centuries CD-ROM Appendix 4: Haptic Erosion Dataset CD-ROM List of Figures Fig. 4.1. Plan of Ripon Cathedral’s crypt (Hall, 2011). p.124 Fig. 4.2. Ripon Cathedral: crypt: 13th century grave markers p.127 Fig. 4.3. St Peter’s Basilica, Rome (Richardson, 2014) p.128 Fig. 4.4. Ripon Cathedral: crypt p.132 Fig. 4.5. Ripon Cathedral: Wilfridian crypt p.135 Fig. 4.6. Shrine and burial of St Edward the Confessor p.141 (© Cambridge University Library, n.d.) Fig. 4.7. St Thomas Becket’s foramina tomb (Wall, 1905, 155). p.142 Fig. 4.8. Canterbury Cathedral, Trinity Chapel: Cure of Richard of Sunieve, p.145 Becket Miracle Window 6 (© Barritt/Getty Images, n.d) Fig. 4.9. Ripon Cathedral, Crypt, Wilfrid’s Needle p.147 Fig. 4.10. Plan of Ripon’s Wilfridian crypt following the 1881 excavation p.148 (Micklethwaite, 1892, 193). Fig.4.11. King Harold of England swears on holy relics in the Bayeux Tapestry p.159 c.1080 (Wikipedia Creative Commons License). Fig.4.12. King Henry II of England kisses the corpse of Edward the Confessor p.159 (Wall, 1905, 225). Fig.4.13. Pilgrims visiting the tomb of St Hedwig, Berlin 1335 (Blick, 2005, p.164 fig.39). Fig.4.14. St Albans Cathedral: St Amphibalus’ Shrine polychromy p.168 Fig.4.15. Pilgrim's Badge of the Shrine of St. Thomas Becket at p.173 Canterbury, 1350–1400 (Metropolitan Museum, Acc. 2001.310). Fig.4.16. Pilgrim's Badge of the Shrine of St. Thomas Becket at Canterbury p.175 (Museum of London, image 005668 ©). Fig. 4.17. Supposed sketch shrine of St Thomas (Crook, 2011, 217). p.176 Fig.4.18. Disabled men collect holy oil from the shrine of St William of York p.179 c.1415. Window at York Minster. Dean & Chapter of York © (Eavis, 2010). Fig.4.19. Man cured by eating mortar from the shrine of St William of York p.179 c.1415. Window at York Minster (Wikipedia Creative Commons License). Fig.4.20. Chester Cathedral: Haptic erosion inside prayer niches of St p.184 Werburgh’s shrine Fig.5.1. Exeter Cathedral: Bishop Branscombe p.210 Fig.5.2. Ripon Cathedral: Thomas Markenfield’s effigy p.211 Fig.5.3. Exeter Cathedral: Robert Stapledon p.211 Fig.5.4. Exeter Cathedral: Humphrey de Bohun and Henry de Ralegh p.212 Fig.5.5. Exeter Cathedral: Cadaver effigy p.213 Fig.5.6. Non-Effigy Tombs with Iconoclasm p.215 Fig. 5.7 Proportion of Eligible Effigy Monuments Contributed to Dataset p.220 Fig. 5.8. Percentage of Surviving Effigy Monuments with Iconoclasm per p.222 century Fig.5.9. Comparison of Period A and Period B Iconoclastic Damage p.224 Fig.5.10. Effigies and Effigy Monuments with Iconoclasm p.226 Fig.5.11. Percentage of all effigy bodies with iconoclastic damage per cathedral p.227 Fig.5.12. Canterbury Cathedral: Hales Memorial p.228 Fig.5.13. Canterbury Cathedral: St Michael’s Chapel p.228 Fig.5.14. Comparison of Period A and Period B Iconoclasm of Effigies p.235 Fig.5.15. Comparison of Hand Damage across Iconoclastic Effigies p.235 Fig.5.16. Body Parts Damaged by Iconoclasm p.237 Fig.5.17. Effigies with Iconoclastic Damage Gender and Status p.240 Fig.5.18. Nose/Face - Hand/Arm damage per social group across both periods p.244 Fig.5.19. Comparison of Period A and Period B Body Part Damage p.247 Fig.5.20. Effigies with missing limbs p.252 Fig.5.21. Black Prince’s Funeral Achievements p.262 Fig.5.22. Archbishop Walter p.264 Fig.5.23. Archbishop Courtenay p.264 Fig.5.24. Dorothea Doderidge p.264 Fig.5.25. Lady Holland p.265 Fig.5.26. Abbot De La Mare’s brass p.266 Fig.5.27. Brass Clippings p.267 Fig.5.28. Bishop Carey’s tomb p.269 Fig.5.29. Valentine Carey’s tomb p.269 Fig.5.30. Hollar’s 17th century ichnographies of Canterbury and St Paul’s p.282 Cathedrals (University of Toronto Digital Hollar Collection, n.d.). Fig.5.31. Canterbury nave pillar graffiti p.283 Fig.5.32. Robert Berkeley’s tomb p.285 Fig.5.33. Robert Berkeley’s tomb p.286 Fig.5.34. Robert Berkeley’s tomb p.287 Fig.5.35. Robert Berkeley’s tomb p.288 Fig.5.36. Graffiti at Chester Cathedral p.290 Fig.5.37. Graffiti on the Markenfield Tomb p.291 Fig.5.38. Graffiti on Bishop Stafford p.293 Fig.5.39. Graffiti on Bishop Stafford p.294 Fig.5.40. Graffiti on Bishop Stafford p.295 Fig.5.41. Graffiti on Bishop Stafford p.296 Fig.5.42. Graffiti on Anthony Harvey’s tomb p.297 Fig.5.43. Graffiti on Dorothea Doderidge’s tomb p.298 Fig.5.44. Graffiti on The Holland tomb p.300 Fig.6.1. Duke Humphrey’s Vault in 1815 (St Albans, 1815, 125) p.323 Fig.6.2. Trapdoor entrance to Duke Humphrey’s Vault (Mason, 1884, 92). p.325 Fig. 6.3. Ripon Cathedral Bone-House (Anon, 1838, 63). p.328 Fig.6.4. Charnel at St Leonard's Church and Rothwell Church (Historic England AL0196/007/02; St Leonard’s Church, n.d; Francis Frith collection neg. p.330 R322015). Fig.6.5. St Albans Cathedral watchloft (Wall, 1905, Plate XII). p.331 Fig.6.6. Canterbury Cathedral: The Black Prince’s tomb. (Taylor, 1875, 371). p.335 Fig.6.7. Canterbury Cathedral: Trinity Chapel and Corona. (Britton, 1826, Plate p.336 X). Fig.6.8. Canterbury Cathedral: North-West Transept (Britton, 1826, Plate VIII). p.337 Fig.6.9. St Albans Cathedral: Dean Walter Lawrance (d.1914; North Transept) p.340 and Bishop Michael Furze (d.1945; Retro Choir). Fig.6.10. Heat Map of Haptic Erosion p.341 Fig.6.11. Canterbury Cathedral: Haptic Erosion of Archbishop Tait’s effigy p.343 Fig.6.12. Canterbury Cathedral: Tombs with Haptic Erosion p.344 Fig.6.13. Exeter Cathedral: Haptic Erosion of Valentine Carey’s Effigy p.345 Fig.6.14. Exeter Cathedral: Haptic Erosion of Edward Cotton’s face p.345 Fig. 6.15. Canterbury Cathedral: Haptic Erosion of Archbishop Temple’s tomb p.350 Fig. 6.16. Exeter Cathedral: Votives and Mementoes at Tombs p.351 Fig. 6.17. Chester Cathedral: St Werburgh’s Shrine p.354 Fig. 6.18. Chester Cathedral: Bishop Pearson’s Tomb p.355 Fig.6.19. Ripon Cathedral: Crypt p.356 Fig.6.20. St Albans Cathedral: St Amphibalus’ Shrine and St Alban’s Mensa p.357 Fig.6.21. St Albans Cathedral: St Alban’s reconstructed shrine p.358 Fig.6.22. St Albans Cathedral: ‘Tomb of the Hermits’ p.359 Fig.6.23. Worshippers physically interacting with the relics of St. Thérèse of p.360 Lisieux (Catholic Church of England and Wales, 2009). Fig.6.24. Extant Mortuary Monuments by Cathedral p.365 Fig.6.25. Frequency of the most common extant mortuary monuments p.365 Fig.6.26. Extant Cathedral Mortuary Monument Types Over Time p.367 Fig. 6.27. Signpost at Ripon Cathedral p.368 Fig. 6.28.