'Weeds' (Hollywood Does Cannabis)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nature Writing in Romania During the Post-War and Post-Communist Period
Emanuel Modoc Faculty of Letters, Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Romania [email protected] NATURE WRITING IN ROMANIA DURING THE POST-WAR AND POST-COMMUNIST PERIOD Recommended Citation: Modoc, Emanuel. “Nature Writing in Romania During the Post-War and Post- Communist Period”. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 3.2 (2017): https://doi.org/10.24193/mjcst.2017.4.04 Abstract: My proposal aims to investigate the changes in the Romanian literary discourse on nature and the effects of industrialization following the 1989 revolution in comparison to the ideological discourse of the post-war era. If Romanian post-war literary discourse is firmly tied to the underlying ideology of Communism, then any attempt to investigate the discourse on nature in this period must be made alongside a reading of the Communist discourse on nature. In this respect, the situation of Romanian post-1989 prose that contains aspects of the influence of Communist industrialization on nature provides an interesting case study on the effects of the post-industrial era on literature itself. Thus, my proposal will focus on a number of novels written after 1989 in an ecocritical mode of reading. Keywords: ecocriticism, nature, ideology, Romanian post-war literature, 1989 Revolution Seeing as Romanian post-war literary discourse is invariably subordinated to the Communist ideology, analysing nature writing, or any discourse on nature of this period for that matter, from an ecocritical perspective could be seen as both a productive and a fruitless endeavour. As paradoxical as it may seem, to talk about nature in Romanian Communism, and then to talk about the Communist discourse on nature implies a careful, exhaustive, and therefore productive analysis of its ideology. -
Supplemental Material for Cannabis Conditional Use Permit Applications
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL FOR CANNABIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS The following information is required to be submitted, as noted, as part of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for a cannabis project. Type of Cannabis CUP This application can be used to apply for one or more types of cannabis permits. Please mark which cannabis business(es) the application is for and the square footage in the building for the use(s). Production: ____ Cannabis cultivation: _________________________________ square feet ____ Cannabis distribution: _________________________________ square feet ____ Cannabis manufacturing: _______________________________ square feet Dispensary: ____ Cannabis dispensary, storefront: ________________________ square feet ____ Cannabis dispensary, delivery-only: _______________________ square feet Total building square footage: _________________________________ square feet If this application is to modify a previously approved CUP (aka - conditional use permit major or minor modification) please list previously approved file number(s) here and explain modification details in the Project Narrative on page 10 of the Planning Entitlement Application: Previous File Number(s): ________________________________________________________________ Neighborhood Context Map An accurate, straight-line drawing depicting the boundaries of the subject property, the boundaries of all other properties within 600 feet of the subject property, and the uses of those properties is required at time of CUP application submittal. If the completed map shows that the cannabis project site is within 600 feet of a public or private K-12 school, the application cannot be accepted. If the completed map shows that the site is within 600 feet of a neighborhood park or a community park (if dispensary application, all park types) as defined by the City of Sacramento Parks and Recreation Master Plan, the site does not qualify for Zoning Administrator review and must be reviewed by the Planning and Design Commission. -
Armortech ® THREESOME ® Label
2,4-D • MECOPROP-p • DICAMBA Threesome® Herbicide Selective broadleaf weed control for turfgrass including use on sod farms. To control clover, dandelion, henbit, plantains, wild onion, and many other broadleaf weeds. Also for highways, rights-of-way and other similar non-crop areas as listed on this label. Contains 2,4-D, mecoprop-p, and dicamba. ACTIVE INGREDIENTS KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN Dimethylamine Salt of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid* .......30.56% Dimethylamine Salt of (+)-R-2-(2-Methyl-4-Chlorophenoxy) DANGER – PELIGRO propionic Acid**‡ .......................................................................8.17% Si usted no entiende la etiqueta, busque a alguien para que se la Dimethylamine Salt of Dicamba (3,6-Dichloro-o-anisic Acid)*** 2.77% explique a usted en detalle. (If you do not understand the label, find someone to explain it to you OTHER INGREDIENTS: ......................................................................58.5% in detail.) TOTAL: ....................................................................................100.00% Isomer Specific Method, Equivalent to: *2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid ................................... 25.38%, 2.38 lbs/gal PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS **(+)-R-2-(2-Methyl-4-Chlorophenoxy)propionic Acid.... 6.75%, 0.63 lbs/gal HAZARDS TO HUMANS AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS ***3,6-Dichloro-o-anisic Acid .......................................... 2.30%, 0.22 lbs/gal Corrosive. Causes irreversible eye damage. Do not get in eyes, or on skin or clothing. ‡CONTAINS THE SINGLE ISOMER FORM OF MECOPROP-p Harmful if swallowed. FIRST AID IF • Call a poison control center or doctor immediately for treatment advice. HOT LINE NUMBER SWALLOWED: • Have person sip a glass of water if able to swallow. Have the product container or label with you when calling a poison control • Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by the poison control center or doctor. -
Weed Discrimination Using Ultrasonic Sensors
INSIGHTS DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00876.x Weed discrimination using ultrasonic sensors D ANDU´JAR*, A ESCOLA` , J DORADO* & C FERNA´NDEZ-QUINTANILLA* *Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, CSIC, Madrid, Spain, and Universitat de Lleida, Lleida, Spain Received 11 March 2011 Revised version accepted 7 June 2011 Subject Editor: Peter Lutman, UK sis revealed that the ultrasonic data could separate three Summary groups of assemblages: pure stands of broad-leaved A new approach is described for automatic discrimina- weeds (lower height), pure stands of grasses (higher tion between grasses and broad-leaved weeds, based on height) and mixed stands of broad-leaved and grass their heights. An ultrasonic sensor was mounted on the weeds (medium height). Dynamic measurements con- front of a tractor, pointing vertically down in the inter- firmed the potential of this system to detect weed row area, with a control system georeferencing and infestations. This technique offers significant promise for registering the echoes reflected by the ground or by the the development of real-time spatially selective weed various leaf layers. Static measurements were taken at control techniques, either as the sole weed detection locations with different densities of grasses (Sorghum system or in combination with other detection tools. halepense) and broad-leaved weeds (Xanthium strumar- Keywords: weed species discrimination, site-specific ium and Datura spp.). The sensor readings permitted the weed management, wide-row crops, ultrasound detec- discrimination of pure stands of grasses (up to 81% tion, patch, sonar. success) and pure stands of broad-leaved weeds (up to 99% success). Moreover, canonical discriminant analy- ANDU´JAR D, ESCOLA` A, DORADO J&FERNA´NDEZ-QUINTANILLA C (2011). -
EFFICACY of ORGANIC WEED CONTROL METHODS Scott Snell, Natural Resources Specialist
FINAL STUDY REPORT (Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May Court House, NJ) EFFICACY OF ORGANIC WEED CONTROL METHODS Scott Snell, Natural Resources Specialist ABSTRACT Organic weed control methods have varying degrees of effectiveness and cover a broad range of costs financially and in time. Studies were conducted at the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May Court House, New Jersey to examine the efficacy and costs of a variety of organic weed control methods: tillage, organic herbicide (acetic acid), flame treatment, solarization, and use of a smother cover crop. The smother cover and organic herbicide treatment plots displayed the least efficacy to control weeds with the average percent weed coverage of each method being over 97%. The organic herbicide plots also had the greatest financial costs and required the second most treatment time following the flame treatment plots. Although the flame treatment method was time consuming, it was effective resulting in an average of 12.14% weed coverage. Solarization required below average treatment time and resulted in an average of 49.22% weed coverage. The tillage method was found to be the most effective means of control and also had well below average financial costs and required slightly above average treatment time. INTRODUCTION The final results of the third biennial national Organic Farming Research Foundation’s (OFRF) survey found that organic producers rank weed control as one of the top problems negatively affecting their farms’ profitability (1999). Weed control options available for organic producers are far more limited than those of conventional production due to organic certification standards. -
Invasive Weeds of the Appalachian Region
$10 $10 PB1785 PB1785 Invasive Weeds Invasive Weeds of the of the Appalachian Appalachian Region Region i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………...i How to use this guide…………………………………ii IPM decision aid………………………………………..1 Invasive weeds Grasses …………………………………………..5 Broadleaves…………………………………….18 Vines………………………………………………35 Shrubs/trees……………………………………48 Parasitic plants………………………………..70 Herbicide chart………………………………………….72 Bibliography……………………………………………..73 Index………………………………………………………..76 AUTHORS Rebecca M. Koepke-Hill, Extension Assistant, The University of Tennessee Gregory R. Armel, Assistant Professor, Extension Specialist for Invasive Weeds, The University of Tennessee Robert J. Richardson, Assistant Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, North Caro- lina State University G. Neil Rhodes, Jr., Professor and Extension Weed Specialist, The University of Ten- nessee ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank all the individuals and organizations who have contributed their time, advice, financial support, and photos to the crea- tion of this guide. We would like to specifically thank the USDA, CSREES, and The Southern Region IPM Center for their extensive support of this pro- ject. COVER PHOTO CREDITS ii 1. Wavyleaf basketgrass - Geoffery Mason 2. Bamboo - Shawn Askew 3. Giant hogweed - Antonio DiTommaso 4. Japanese barberry - Leslie Merhoff 5. Mimosa - Becky Koepke-Hill 6. Periwinkle - Dan Tenaglia 7. Porcelainberry - Randy Prostak 8. Cogongrass - James Miller 9. Kudzu - Shawn Askew Photo credit note: Numbers in parenthesis following photo captions refer to the num- bered photographer list on the back cover. HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE Tabs: Blank tabs can be found at the top of each page. These can be custom- ized with pen or marker to best suit your method of organization. Examples: Infestation present On bordering land No concern Uncontrolled Treatment initiated Controlled Large infestation Medium infestation Small infestation Control Methods: Each mechanical control method is represented by an icon. -
Weeds: Control and Prevention
Weed Control and Prevention Sheriden Hansen Assistant Professor, Horticulture USU Extension, Davis County COURSE OBJECTIVES • What is the definition of a weed • Why are weeds so difficult to control? • Annuals vs. biennials vs. perennials • Methods of spread • Noxious weeds • How to control • Methods of control • Tips to win the weed war • Common weeds and how to beat them! What is a weed? • A plant out of place • An undesirable plant • An interfering plant • “A plant whose virtues have not yet been discovered.” Ralph Waldo Emmerson • A plant that has mastered every survival skill except how to grow in rows • A plant that someone will spend time and money to kill! What is a weed? • Any plant that interferes with the management objectives for a given area of land at a given point in time. Weeds are successful survivors! • Excellent reproducers • They grow FAST • They are hardy generalists and can live just about anywhere Multiple ways of spreading! • By seed production • Seeds remain viable for YEARS! • Produce copious seeds • Runners or rhizomes/stolons • They have adapted to being spread in creative ways • Animal fur • Wind • Bird, deer, lizard digestion • Wheels Photo: Missoula County Weed District and Extension Annual vs biennial vs perennial weeds • What is an annual? • Plant that performs its entire lifecycle from seed to flower to seed in a single growing season • Dormant seed bridges the gap from one generation to the next F.D. Richards, Flickr.com Annual vs biennial vs perennial weeds • Annual weeds spread by seed only • Spurge -
Cannabis Mobile Apps: a Content Analysis
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH Ramo et al Original Paper Cannabis Mobile Apps: A Content Analysis Danielle E Ramo1, PhD; Lucy Popova2, PhD; Rachel Grana2, MPH, PhD; Shirley Zhao1, BA; Kathryn Chavez1, BA 1Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States 2Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States Corresponding Author: Danielle E Ramo, PhD Department of Psychiatry University of California, San Francisco 401 Parnassus Avenue Box TRC 0984 San Francisco, CA, 94143 United States Phone: 1 415 476 7695 Fax: 1 415 476 7053 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: Mobile technology is pervasive and widely used to obtain information about drugs such as cannabis, especially in a climate of rapidly changing cannabis policy; yet the content of available cannabis apps is largely unknown. Understanding the resources available to those searching for cannabis apps will clarify how this technology is being used to reflect and influence cannabis use behavior. Objective: We investigated the content of 59 cannabis-related mobile apps for Apple and Android devices as of November 26, 2014. Methods: The Apple and Google Play app stores were searched using the terms ªcannabisº and ªmarijuana.º Three trained coders classified the top 20 apps for each term and each store, using a coding guide. Apps were examined for the presence of 20 content codes derived by the researchers. Results: Total apps available for each search term were 124 for cannabis and 218 for marijuana in the Apple App Store, and 250 each for cannabis and marijuana on Google Play. -
RANGE ROBBERS Vaidedetaide R4et9e Peapted
RANGE ROBBERS VAidedetaide R4et9e Peapted FEDERAL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE OREGON STATE COLLEGE,CORVALLIS Cooperative Extension work in Agriculture and Home Economics, F. E. Price, director. Oregon State College and the United States Department of Agriculture cooperating. Printed and distributed in furtherance Of Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Extension Bulletin 780 December 1958 IS THE THIRD in a series of Oregon Extension bulle- THIS1 tins on ranges and range management. The first was Ex- tension Bulletin 770, "Grass is the Wealth." It covered prin- ciples of grass growth. The second was "Extension Bulletin 772, "Ranchers, Ranges and Cows." It concerned livestock in relation to range feed. The principles listed applied to sheep as well as cattle. This bulletin, "Range Robbers," tells of the effects of sagebrush and other range weeds that steal moisture and plant food from useful range plants. Contents Page The Losses From Weeds 5 In former years the cattle thief was the villain of the range ; today weeds are stealing profit from the ranchers. I've Been Robbed 6 The rancher can organize his own system to get rid of the thieving weeds. What Tools Do the Robbers Use? 6 Weeds are encouraged and spread in many ways. Who Is Guilty? 7 Ranch owners may be innocent accomplices of thieving weeds. Make the Punishment Fit the Crime 8 Corrective measures vary for different weeds. Criminals Are Hard to Manage Keeping livestock off the range helps the situation, but other10 methods can speed up the improvement program. Rebuild Without Heavy Investment 10 Seven suggestions are given for range rebuilding. -
Jan. 23-27, 2017
UNICAMERAL UPDATE Stories published daily at Update.Legislature.ne.gov Vol. 40, Issue 4 / Jan. 23 - 27, 2017 Kintner State sales taxes for large resigns from online retailers proposed Legislature en. Bill Kintner of Papillion announced at a morning press Sconference Jan. 25 that he has resigned from the Legislature. Kintner said he had offered his res- ignation letter to Speaker Jim Scheer this morning. The letter states that his resignation is effective at 12:01 a.m. on Jan. 30. Kintner faced a surge of public an- ger this week after retweeting a com- ment about the re- cent Women’s March that appeared to Sen. Bill Kintner Members of the Revenue Committee listen to public testimony on two bills calling for sales make light of sexual assault. During tax on online purchases. floor debate on a separate issue yester- he Revenue Committee heard retailers every year. day, more than 20 senators rose to say two bills Jan. 27 that would If a retailer would refuse to collect Kintner should resign or face expulsion Trequire some online retailers the tax, it would be required to notify due to his pattern of behavior. Law- to collect sales taxes on Nebraska Nebraska purchasers that tax is due makers said they had received a flood transactions. and that the state requires them to of angry emails and phone calls from LB44, introduced by Sen. Dan file a sales or use tax return on their constituents calling for his dismissal. Watermeier of Syracuse, would require purchases. Each failure to notify would Last summer the Nebraska Account- online retailers without a physical result in a $5 penalty. -
Beta Cinema Presents a Purple Bench Films / Zero Gravity Films / Live Through the Heart Films / Barry Films / Furture Films Production “Walter” Andrew J
BETA CINEMA PRESENTS A PURPLE BENCH FILMS / ZERO GRAVITY FILMS / LIVE THROUGH THE HEART FILMS / BARRY FILMS / FURTURE FILMS PRODUCTION “WALTER” ANDREW J. WEST JUSTIN KIRK NEVE CAMPBELL LEVEN RAMBIN MILO VENTIMIGLIA JIM GRAFFIGAN BRIAN WHITE PETER FACINELLI VIRGINIA MADSEN WILLIAM H. MACY CASTING J.C. CANTU MUSIC DAN ROMER MUSIC SUPERVISOR KIEHR LEHMAN EDITING KRISTIN MCCASEY DIRCTOR OF PHOTOGRAPHY STEVE CAPITANO CALITRI PRODUCTION DESIGN MICHAEL BRICKER COSTUMES LAUREN SCHAD EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS BILL JOHNSON SAM ENGELBARDT JENNIFER LAURENT RICK ST. GEORGE JOHN FULLER CARL RUMBAUGH TIM HILL RICKY MARGOLIS SIMON GRAHAM-CLARE WOLFGANG MUELLER MICHEL MERKT ANNA MASTRO CO-EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS STEFANIE MASTRO MICHAEL DAVID MASTRO KEITH MATSON AND JOANNE MATSON CO-PRODUCER ANTONIO SCLAFANI ASSOCIATE PRODUCER MICHAEL BRICKER PRODUCED BY MARK HOLDER CHRISTINE HOLDER BRENDEN PATRICK HILL RYAN HARRIS BENITO MUELLER WRITTEN BY PAUL SHOULBERG DIRECTED BY ANNA MASTRO Director Anna Mastro (GOSSIP GIRL) Cast William H. Macy (SHAMELESS, FARGO) Virginia Madsen (SIDEWAYS) Peter Facinelli (TWILIGHT) Andrew J. West (THE WALKING DEAD) Justin Kirk (WEEDS, MR. MORGAN‘S LAST LOVE) Neve Campbell (SCREAM, WILD THINGS) Milo Ventimiglia (HEROS, THAT´S MY BOY) Genre Comedy / Drama Language English Length 88 min Produced by Zero Gravity, Purple Bench Films, Barry Films and Demarest Films WALTER SYNOPSIS Walter believes himself to be the son of God. As such, it is his responsibility to judge whether people will spend eternity in heaven or hell. That’s a lot to manage along with his job as a ticket- tearer at a movie theater, his loving but neurotic mother, and his growing but unspoken affection for his co-worker Kendall. -
Choose Making Intentional Relationship Choices
Choose Making Intentional Relationship Choices Brian Higginbotham, Utah State University Anthony Santiago, Iowa State University Allen Barton, University of Georgia Introduction What Choose Looks Like he central dimension of the NERMEM is Choose. Choose refers to deliberate and conscious decisions that help to create and strengthen healthy relationships. A � Being intentional: strong, healthy, long-lasting relationship does not just happen by chance. Healthy Deciding, not sliding relationships are determined by the initial choices a person makes when entering � Committing effort to T into a new relationship as well as the ongoing choices made to be committed, the relationship intentional, proactive, and strengths-focused in sustaining a relationship. Choose � Focusing on each conveys the importance of intentionality in establishing and nourishing healthy other’s strengths relationships and is inherent, expected, and necessary in all of the other dimensions that will be discussed in this guide. According to Doherty (2001), an intentional � Avoiding hurtful relationship is “one where the partners are conscious, deliberate, and planful about thoughts and behaviors maintaining and building their commitment and connection over the years” (p. 18). � Finding ways to Intentionally choosing to think, feel, and behave in ways that strengthen relationships strengthen and grow is essential to healthy and stable unions. the relationship Choose applies to singles who make decisions regarding whether or not to create � Envisioning a healthy relationships, as well as couples who are trying to maintain and strengthen their relationship and future relationships. For singles, choose applies not only to choosing who to be with, but together also choosing to protect one’s self and family.