DOCSLIB.ORG

1 PS 189-01: WILSON to OBAMA: LIBERAL INTERNATIONALISM in THEORY and PRACTICE of AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Fall 2010 Tony

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 PS 189-01: WILSON to OBAMA: LIBERAL INTERNATIONALISM in THEORY and PRACTICE of AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Fall 2010 Tony PS 189-01: WILSON TO OBAMA: LIBERAL INTERNATIONALISM IN THEORY AND PRACTICE OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Fall 2010 Tony Smith Office hours: Tuesday: 9-10 and 12-2 or by appointment Packard 208 [email protected] (much better than phone, which is 73467) Senior Seminars are meant to be capstone experience in the political science department. They presuppose background in the material to be covered and they encourage you to write a 20-30 page paper plus endnotes/footnotes on a subject relevant to the course that you select for yourself. Seminars are exercises in reading, writing, research, and class participation. Every year I select two papers from the class to nominate for the political science and international relations writing prizes. In 2010, Laura Kaplan won the top writing prize in international relations for her paper on Oscar Arias as a liberal internationalist. (You will find a copy of her essay on the Black Board—BB.) My hope is that you will consider this course to be the most important piece of intellectual work you are doing this semester if not this year. Our topic is the study of a central tradition in the making of American foreign policy is liberal internationalism, often called Wilsonianism. The tradition maintains that American leadership of a world order based on the spread of democratic government, economic globalization based on free trade and investment, and multilateralism is not only in the interest of this country’s national security but would create the conditions for world peace. Different presidents since Woodrow Wilson have accentuated different aspects of this framework, but high water marks of liberalism can be seen in the 1940s as the Roosevelt and Truman administrations debated world order projects, and since the late 1970s during the administrations of Carter, Reagan, Bush senior, Clinton, and, most importantly, Bush junior. This course will concentrate on two administrations especially: that of Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) and that of George W. Bush (2001-2009). But it will look at the historical sweep of the past century as well, and it will also speculate on the extent the administration of Barack Obama is, or will be,Wilsonian. The over-arching question that the course asks is in the realm of international relations theory: would the world be a markedly better place politically were its leading powers democracies; and if the answer is yes, can such a world order be created? Three main questions will concern us. First, what is the link argued to be between American democracy promotion abroad and the national security? That is, be careful what we wish for: is the case to be made clear-cut that the global expansion of democratic government much matters, or are there reservations to be entered, doubts to be entertained to such a point that we should reject the contention altogether? Second, when is it wise to promote human rights and democracy abroad, when foolhardy? That is, if democracy promotion is in the American national interest, 1 might the obstacles to its expansion as a form of government nevertheless be so great that it would be prudent to rein in our enthusiasm for it for fear of creating disorder abroad and weakening the US? Third, how likely is the worldwide appeal of human rights and democracy (as we understand them today) to survive if there is a decline of American power in the decades to come? That is, does the worth of this form of social and political organization have local roots so that we should not exaggerate the importance of the US in its appeal? Everyone in the class will be asked to write a 6 page paper on “What is Liberal Internationalism/Wilsonianism” due on October 19 by noon, to be returned in class on the 21st. This paper can serve as the introduction to your final paper due December 18. The topic of the final paper is either the opening line by John Ikenberry in the first reading for the semester: “Was George Bush the heir of Woodrow Wilson?” OR, “Did Woodrow Wilson “intuit” democratic peace theory between 1912 and 1920?” OR if you were writing a new Introduction and final chapter to the book America’s Mission, what would you be sure to put in it? At first reading, each of these questions may seem unclear, but within short order you’ll get on the wave length and see how probing such questions can be. In a few instances, where students have strong interests in topics that differ from the three aforementioned, other final paper topics can be undertaken. Thus, some of you may want to stay largely with Woodrow Wilson and ask questions about how coherent his own writings were before and after he became president as to the vision that he held for America in world affairs. For example, what were his hopes for promoting democracy abroad through the creation of the Pan American Union and the League of Nations? Or why did democracy promotion seem such a panacea to Wilson; was it a form of religion that would transform human beings? Others of you may prefer to look at hypotheticals such as the question of whether a Democratic administration under Al Gore might have decided to attack Iraq as the Bush administration did, given the thinking of Joseph Lieberman as Vice-President and the role of the Progressive Policy Institute of the Democratic Leadership Council in supporting just such an undertaking. Still others may want to analyze the Obama administration in terms of who is doing what in terms of democracy promotion at State, Defense, the National Security Council, and among military leaders such as General Petraeus—not to speak of the President and the Vice-President. While we will cover briefly the period between Wilson and Bush (that is 1924-2000), let me discourage topics that do not focus either on Wilson or on our political leaders since 2000 (making the Obama administration a legitimate topic, as well, obviously, as that of George W. Bush). Or consider what Laura Kaplan did last year in an essay you can find on the BB and which won the IR writing prize in 2010. She looked at Costa Rica’s Oscar Arias as a liberal internationalist, demonstrating that the ideas and practices called for by Wilson could be “found in translation” in the context of Central America. Kaplan’s interest was in Latin America studies (she is currently in Colombia on a Fulbright) so she was able to mesh her general interests to this course. 2 BOOKS FOR THE COURSE (all are in paper except Ikenberry and Smith, A Pact but check amazon.com for used copies) John Ikenberry et al., American Foreign Policy in Crisis: The Future of Wilsonianism in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton University Press Will Marshall, ed., With All Our Might 0742551997 Rowman and Littlefield Tony Smith, America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century, Princeton University Press Tony Smith, A Pact with the Devil: Washington’s Bid for World Supremacy and the Betrayal of the American Promise Morton H. Halperin and Michael H. Fuchs, The Survival and the Success of Liberty: A Democracy Agenda for U.S. Foreign Policy. Century Foundation, 9780870785146 Assigned articles that are on the Blackboard are so indicated by BB. AGENDA FOR THE COURSE 1. Sept. 9: Introduction to the subject and tips on reading and writing 2. Sept. 16: John Ikenberry et al., American Foreign Policy in Crisis; Ikenberry and Anne-Marie Slaughter, “Forging a World of Liberty under Law,” the Princeton Project, 2006; BB; Cooper, Desch, Smith on the Ikenberry et al. volume from h-diplo July 2009 BB 3. Sept. 23: T. Smith, America’s Mission, preface and chpts 1-4; Smith, “From ‘Fortunate Vagueness’ to ‘Democratic Globalism,’” BB. 4. Sept. 30: Statements by Wilson himself: “On Democratic Government,” 1885 BB; selections from The State, 1898, BB; Mobile speech, October 1913; Address to the Senate, January 22, 1917; Declaration of War, April 1917; Fourteen Points, January 1918; Address to the Senate, July 1919; essay in the Atlantic Monthly of December 1902, “The Ideals of America”—all of which can be found by googling or on BB. 5. Oct. 7: Pankaj Mishra, “Ordained as a Nation,” London Review of Books, Feb. 21, 2008 BB; The Atlantic Charter: Joint Statement by President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill, 8/14/1941; The Yalta Conference II: Declaration of Liberated Europe, 2/1945; “The Truman Doctrine,” 3/12/1947; JFK, Inaugural and announcement of the Alliance for Progress, “Address, 3/16/1961,” the Carter Inaugural; Ronald Reagan, “Westminster Speech,” 6/4/1982. All of these statements/speeches are on BB but can easily be googled. America’s Mission, chpts. 6-10. 3 6. Oct. 14, America’s Mission, chpt. 11; Pact with the Devil, Preface, intro, chpts. 1-3; George W. Bush, “The National Security Strategy of the United States,” 9/2002; Bush speeches of June 1, 2002, Feb. 26, 2003, Nov. 6 2003, Jan. 20, 2005, Feb.2, 2005. Barack Obama, Cairo and Nobel addresses of June and December 2009, and skim the National Security Strategy and Hillary Clinton’s explanation of it, both May 2010. 7. Oct. 21: Paper one: What is Wilsonianism? This paper is due on October 19 by noon; it will be turned back in class on the 21th. In class today, we will watch a film, “Bush’s War” made by Frontline 8. Oct. 28: Will Marshall, ed., With All Our Might, look over the various entries in the book so as to get an overall sense of where it is going, then read the Introduction and chapters 2 (Pollack), 3 (Diamond and McFaul), 10 (Asmus), 11 (Slaughter), 14 (Kleinfeld/Spence).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 BARACK OBAMA, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, and JOHN DEWEY In
    File: Schulten web preprint Created on: 1/29/2009 9:52:00 AM Last Printed: 1/31/2009 2:13:00 PM BARACK OBAMA, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, AND JOHN DEWEY SUSAN SCHULTEN In the last few months, there has been a spate of comparisons be- tween Obama and some of our most influential former presidents. Just days after the election, Congress announced the theme of the inaugura- tion as “A New Birth of Freedom,” while reporters and commentators speculate about “A New New Deal” or “Lincoln 2.0.”1 Many of these comparisons are situational: Obama is a relatively inexperienced lawyer- turned-politician who will inherit two wars and an economic crisis un- equalled since the Great Depression.2 The backlash has been equally vocal. Many consider these com- parisons both premature and presumptuous, evidence that the media is sympathetic toward an Obama Administration or that the President-elect has himself orchestrated these connections.3 Indeed, Obama frequently invoked Lincoln as both a model for and an influence over his own can- didacy, which he launched on the steps of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. He introduced Vice-President Joe Biden in the same spot, where the latter also referenced the memory of Lincoln.4 Cer- tainly it makes sense for Obama to exploit Lincoln’s legacy, for no other figure in American history continues to command such admiration, the occasional neo-Confederate or other detractor notwithstanding.5 To posi- tion Obama in front of the State House is surely meant to place him as a kind of an heir to Lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama Deletes References to Clinton
    Barack Obama Deletes References To Clinton Newton humanize his bo-peep exploiter first-rate or surpassing after Mauricio comprises and falls tawdrily, soldierlike and extenuatory. Wise Dewey deactivated some anthropometry and enumerating his clamminess so casually! Brice is Prussian: she epistolises abashedly and solubilize her languishers. Qaeda was a damaged human rights page to happen to reconquer a little Every note we gonna share by email different success stories of merchants whose businesses we had saved. On clinton deleted references, obama told us democratic nomination of. Ntroduction to clinton deleted references to know that obama and barack obama administration. Rainfall carries into clinton deleted references to the. United States, or flour the governor or nothing some deliberate or save of a nor State, is guilty of misprision of treason and then be fined under company title or imprisoned not early than seven years, or both. Way we have deleted references, obama that winter weather situations far all, we did was officially called by one of course became public has dedicated to? Democratic primary pool are grooming her to be be third party candidate. As since been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, would not steer the convict they were transmitted. New Zealand as Muslim. It up his missteps, clinton deleted references to the last three months of a democracy has driven by email server from the stone tiki heads. Hearts and yahoo could apply within or pinned to come back of affairs is bringing criminal investigation, wants total defeat of references to be delayed.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Van Buren National Historic Site
    M ARTIN VAN BUREN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY, 1974-2006 SUZANNE JULIN NATIONAL PARK SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NORTHEAST REGION HISTORY PROGRAM JULY 2011 i Cover Illustration: Exterior Restoration of Lindenwald, c. 1980. Source: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Illustrations vii Acknowledgements ix Introduction 1 Chapter One: Recognizing Lindenwald: The Establishment Of Martin Van Buren National Historic Site 5 Chapter Two: Toward 1982: The Race To The Van Buren Bicentennial 27 Chapter Three: Saving Lindenwald: Restoration, Preservation, Collections, and Planning, 1982-1987 55 Chapter Four: Finding Space: Facilities And Boundaries, 1982-1991 73 Chapter Five: Interpreting Martin Van Buren And Lindenwald, 1980-2000 93 Chapter Six: Finding Compromises: New Facilities And The Protection of Lindenwald, 1992-2006 111 Chapter Seven: New Possibilities: Planning, Interpretation and Boundary Expansion 2000-2006 127 Conclusion: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Administrative History 143 Appendixes: Appendix A: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Visitation, 1977-2005 145 Appendix B: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Staffi ng 147 Appendix C: Martin Van Buren National Historic Site Studies, Reports, And Planning Documents 1936-2006 151 Bibliography 153 Index 159 v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.1. Location of MAVA on Route 9H in Kinderhook, NY Figure 1.2. Portrait of the young Martin Van Buren by Henry Inman, circa 1840 Library of Congress Figure 1.3. Photograph of the elderly Martin Van Buren, between 1840 and 1862 Library of Congress Figure 1.4. James Leath and John Watson of the Columbia County Historical Society Photograph MAVA Collection Figure 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights Summit at LBJ Library: President Barack Obama's Keynote Address, April 10, 2014
    Civil Rights Summit at LBJ Library: President Barack Obama's Keynote Address, April 10, 2014 [APPLAUSE] MARK UPDEGROVE [Director, Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library]: Welcome to the Civil Rights Summit, as we welcome the President and First Lady of the United States. We shall overcome. That song became an anthem for the civil rights movement. For those who fought against racial injustice, those words have special meaning. On March 7, 1965, John Lewis helped to lead a protest march for voting rights from Selma, Alabama to the state's capital, Montgomery. The march was brutally thwarted by Alabama State Troopers in a day of infamy that became known as Bloody Sunday. President Lyndon Johnson was never one to let a good crisis go to waste. A week later he used Bloody Sunday the show the need to pass the Voting Rights Act that he had proposed, but that had stalled in the halls of congress. In a plea before Congress and the nation, he said, “It is all of us who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice -- and we shall overcome.” John Lewis watched that speech in Selma with his mentor, Dr. Martin Luther King, at his side. As President Johnson said those words, Mr. Lewis saw Dr. King cry for the first time. “We will march from Selma to Montgomery,” Dr. King said, with tears in his eyes. “The Voting Rights Act will pass.” Dr. King and Mr. Lewis made their march from Selma to Montgomery, and President Johnson passed the Voting Rights Act. If we have overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice, it is largely because of the courage and fortitude of those like Lyndon Johnson, Martin Luther King, and John Lewis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prez Quiz Answers
    PREZ TRIVIAL QUIZ AND ANSWERS Below is a Presidential Trivia Quiz and Answers. GRADING CRITERIA: 33 questions, 3 points each, and 1 free point. If the answer is a list which has L elements and you get x correct, you get x=L points. If any are wrong you get 0 points. You can take the quiz one of three ways. 1) Take it WITHOUT using the web and see how many you can get right. Take 3 hours. 2) Take it and use the web and try to do it fast. Stop when you want, but your score will be determined as follows: If R is the number of points and T 180R is the number of minutes then your score is T + 1: If you get all 33 right in 60 minutes then you get a 100. You could get more than 100 if you do it faster. 3) The answer key has more information and is interesting. Do not bother to take the quiz and just read the answer key when I post it. Much of this material is from the books Hail to the chiefs: Political mis- chief, Morals, and Malarky from George W to George W by Barbara Holland and Bland Ambition: From Adams to Quayle- the Cranks, Criminals, Tax Cheats, and Golfers who made it to Vice President by Steve Tally. I also use Wikipedia. There is a table at the end of this document that has lots of information about presidents. THE QUIZ BEGINS! 1. How many people have been president without having ever held prior elected office? Name each one and, if they had former experience in government, what it was.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama and Joe Biden on Defense Issues
    BARACK OBAMA AND JOE BIDEN ON DEFENSE ISSUES Before the 2000 election, George Bush and Dick Cheney famously told our military “Help is on the way.” Today, the active Army is short 3,000 captains and majors, and 58 percent of recent West Point graduates are choosing to leave the force – double the historic average. We do not have a single combat brigade at home in reserve, ready for an unexpected crisis. Our National Guard and Reserves have only half the equipment levels they need, hampering their ability to respond to crises, foreign and domestic. Ending the war in Iraq will be the beginning, but not the end, of addressing our defense challenges. Terrorist networks with a global reach and aspirations to weapons of mass destruction threaten our security. Failing states half a world away can provide safe harbor for terrorists and destabilize entire regions. Extreme regimes, like Iran and North Korea, threaten their neighbors, proliferate nuclear technology, and support terrorists while rising powers like China hold the potential to be either partners or adversaries. And most importantly, nations around the globe are reluctant to join with America in taking on mutual threats because they question our own commitment to democracy, justice, peace, and opportunity. The defense policies detailed here represent one aspect of Barack Obama and Joe Biden’s comprehensive, rigorous approach to advancing American national security and foreign policy. Their initiatives on diplomacy and development (detailed in separate fact sheet available on barackobama.com) combined with his defense policies will create a stronger America and a safer world.
    [Show full text]
  • Barack Obama the Pursuit of Identity EPISODE TRANSCRIPT
    Barack Obama The pursuit of identity EPISODE TRANSCRIPT Listen to Presidential at http://wapo.st/presidential This transcript was run through an automated transcription service and then lightly edited for clarity. There may be typos or small discrepancies from the podcast audio. BARRACK OBAMA CLIP: I stand here knowing that my story is part of the larger American story -- that I owe a debt to all of those who came before me and that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: This is Barack Obama in 2004 before he had held any national political office. Four years later, he would be elected the first black president of the United States. BARRACK OBAMA: Our pride is based on a very simple premise, summed up in a declaration made over 200 years ago: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ That is the true genius of America. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: I'm Lillian Cunningham with The Washington Post, and this is the 43rd episode of “Presidential.” PRESIDENTIAL THEME MUSIC LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: This isn't our very final episode of the series, but it is our last episode chronicling the people who've served already as president of the United States. So, I think it's fitting that, in this episode, we come full circle to a question that we've really been asking since the very beginning, which is, 'Who are we?' Well, that question -- 'Who am I?' -- is essentially at the very core of Obama's own personal story.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Transformation Through Executive Branch Action
    ONE Policy Transformation through Executive Branch Action In early June 2018, the Justice Department announced it would not defend key provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare) from a suit seeking to overturn the law in a federal district court. Specifically, the Trump administration refused to back provisions of the health reform law that guaranteed Americans with preexisting conditions, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, or cancer, access to insurance at premiums comparable to those paid by healthier people. Democrats in Congress denounced the Trump admin- istration for failing to defend the law, as the Obama administration had done. And Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell asserted: “Everybody I know in the Senate— everybody— is in favor of maintaining coverage for preexisting conditions.”1 Nine months later, before a federal court of appeals, the Trump administration changed its position to argue, despite opposition from the Attorney General, that the entire ACA was unconstitutional.2 “What a glorious mess,” thundered Representative John Dingell upon learning in 2007 that the Supreme Court had assigned federal responsi- 1 Thompson-Wong-Rabe_Trump, Ad Pres, Fedism_i-xiv_1-242.indd 1 8/11/20 11:46 AM 2 Trump, the Administrative Presidency, and Federalism bility for climate change to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through a case brought by coastal states. “The only way in which that can be properly addressed is by seeing to it that the Congress goes in and cuts down the thicket so we can achieve an intelligent policy.”3 But Con- gresses have repeatedly failed to adopt policy on climate change since it reached the national agenda in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Administration Record for the LGBT Community
    Obama Administration Record for the LGBT Community “Every single American -- gay, straight, lesbian, bisexual, transgender -- every single American deserves to be treated equally in the eyes of the law and in the eyes of our society. It’s a pretty simple proposition.” -President Barack Obama, October 1, 2011 President Obama values every American, and his Administration has made historic strides to expand opportunity, advance equality, honor differences and level the playing field for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) people and communities. The President’s efforts have included major legislative achievements such as the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” as well as significant administrative actions in support of equality. The Obama Administration’s record in support of the LGBT community includes: Repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: The President signed the bill to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell on December 22, 2010, putting in motion the end of a discriminatory policy that ran counter to our values as Americans. As of September 20, 2011, when the repeal took effect, gay, lesbian, and bisexual Americans can serve openly in our Armed Forces and without fear of losing their jobs for who they are and who they love. Ending the Legal Defense of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA): In February 2011, the President and Attorney General announced that the Department of Justice would no longer defend Section 3 of DOMA against equal protection constitutional challenges brought by same-sex couples married under state law. In July 2011, the White House announced the President’s support of the Respect for Marriage Act, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein and Congressman Jerrold Nadler, which would repeal DOMA and uphold the principle that gay and lesbian couples should receive the same Federal rights and legal protections as straight couples.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE The Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum 4079 Albany Post Road, Hyde Park, NY 12538-1917 www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu 1-800-FDR-VISIT April 14, 2009 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Jim Olson, (845) 437-5376 The June and Aaron Gillespie Forum and the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum present COMMUNITY DISCUSSION: PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FIRST 100 DAYS Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:00 p.m. HYDE PARK, NY -- Mid-Hudson Valley residents are invited to participate in a community discussion assessing President Barack Obama’s first 100 days in office. The event, which is free and open to the public, will be held Wednesday, April 29, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. at the Henry A. Wallace Center at the FDR Presidential Library and Home, 4079 Albany Post Road (Route 9) in Hyde Park, New York. Opening the discussion will be four faculty members from area colleges, each commenting on an aspect of the Obama administration. JoAnne Myers (Marist College) will speak on President Obama’s style of leadership, while Joel Diemond (Dutchess Community College) will address the President’s economic policies. Foreign policy will be presented by Mark Lytle (Bard College) and Sarita Gregory (Vassar College) will speak on issues of race and ethnicity. After these opening comments, members of the audience will have ample opportunity to share their perspectives. David Woolner, Senior Vice President of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute, will moderate the discussion. President Obama faces a situation similar to that of President Roosevelt in 1933: rallying the nation at a time of profound economic crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • How Bush and Obama Created a Gold Standard Transition
    HOW BUSH AND OBAMA CREATED A GOLD STANDARD TRANSITION INTRODUCTION Ensuring that an incoming administration is ready to govern in the most consequential transition since 1932 will require active cooperation of an incumbent administration. The transition from George W. Bush to Barack Obama presents a model of how two administrations from different parties can work together to secure America in the face of challenges at home and abroad. This paper draws on the example set by Bush and Obama to describe how to manage an effective transition between outgoing and incoming presidents in three areas: people, policy and process. PEOPLE Setting a Positive Tone The foundation for a cooperative transition from one administration to the next begins with the two presidents themselves. President Bush set the tone two days after the 2008 election when he addressed staff members on the South Lawn of the White House about the upcoming transition: “Ensuring that this transition is as smooth as possible is a priority for the rest of my presidency. We face economic challenges that will not pause to let a new president settle in. This will also be America's first wartime presidential transition in four decades. We're in a struggle against violent extremists determined to attack us -- and they would like nothing more than to exploit this period of change to harm the American people. So over the next 75 days, all of us must ensure that the next president and his team can hit the ground running.” Bush’s remarks were the most extensive comments in history by any outgoing president on the importance of a smooth transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Frequently Shrouded in Ambigui- Ties, the Text of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of The
    No. 20-5 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, ET AL., Petitioners, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, Respondent. ____________________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ____________________ BRIEF OF BIPARTISAN FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS ____________________ BEN FEUER Counsel of Record ANNA-ROSE MATHIESON WALTER E. DELLINGER III CALIFORNIA APPELLATE DUKE UNIVERSITY LAW GROUP LLP 210 Science Drive 96 Jessie Street Durham, NC 27708 San Francisco, CA 94105 (202) 383-5319 (415) 649-6700 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE ............................ 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................................... 3 ARGUMENT ............................................................. 6 I. From Textualist, Originalist, Purposivist, and Structuralist Perspectives, the Constitution Prohibits the President From Obtaining Profits or Business Advantages “of Any Kind Whatever” from a Foreign State Unless He First Acquires Congress’s Approval. ...... 6 A. The plain text of the Foreign Emoluments Clause is clear and unambiguous, as is the original meaning of the words used. ................. 6 B. A purposivist analysis of the Foreign Emoluments Clause establishes the Framers’ intent to provide a sweeping, expansive bulwark against foreign corruption of the President. ................................. 10 C. The Constitution’s structure relies on the President disclosing to Congress any financial gain or valuable asset he receives from a foreign state, and past Presidents have understood and followed that command. ........................................... 14 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page D. Lesser federal office-holders also historically complied with the Foreign Emoluments Clause by disclosing to Congress anything of value received from a foreign government and awaiting approval before accepting it.
    [Show full text]