SM a o v t i o n n n s I i n n o E i t d u c a Successful Charter Schools u.s. department of education office of innovation and improvement SM a o v t i o n n n s I i n n o E i t d u c a Successful Charter Schools u.s. department of education office of innovation and improvement This report was produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-01-CO-0012, Task Order D010, with WestEd. U.S. Department of Education Rod Paige Secretary Office of Innovation and Improvement Nina S. Rees Deputy Under Secretary Michael J. Petrilli Associate Deputy Under Secretary for Innovation and Improvement John Fiegel Director, Parent Options and Information June 2004 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement, Innovations in Education: Successful Charter Schools, Washington, D.C., 2004. To order copies of this report, write to: ED Pubs, Education Publications Center, U.S. Department of Education, P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD 20794-1398; or fax your request to: (301) 470-1244; or e-mail your request to: [email protected]; or call in your request toll-free: 1-877-433-7827 (1-877-4-ED-PUBS). If 877 service is not yet available in your area, call 1-800-872-5327 (1-800-USA-LEARN). Those who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a teletypewriter (TTY), should call 1-800-437-0833; or order online at: www.edpubs.org/. This report is also available on the Department’s Web site at: http://www.ed.gov/admins/comm/choice/charter. On request, this publication is available in alternate formats, such as Braille, large print, or computer diskette. For more information, please contact the Department’s Alternate Format Center at (202) 260-9895 or (202) 205-8113. Contents Foreword v Introduction 1 Part I: Elements of Effective Charter Schools 5 Getting a Good Start 5 Leading With a Mission 6 Innovating Across the School Program 6 Promoting a Community of Continuous Learning 13 Partnering With Parents and the Community 14 Governing for Accountability 16 Implications 19 Part II: Charter School Profiles 21 The Arts and Technology Academy Public Charter School 23 BASIS School, Inc. 27 Community of Peace Academy 31 KIPP Academy Houston 35 Oglethorpe Charter School 39 Ralph A. Gates Elementary School 43 Roxbury Preparatory Charter School 47 The School of Arts and Sciences 51 Acknowledgments 55 Appendix A: Research Methodology 57 Appendix B: Resources 59 Notes 61 iii Innovations in Education: Successful Charter Schools LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Demographics of Profiled Charter Schools 2 Figure 2. Framework for Site Analysis 4 Figure 3. Mosaica and the Arts and Technology Academy 7 Figure 4. The School of Arts and Sciences Thematic Instruction Rubric 8 Figure 5. BASIS Course Requirements 9 Figure 6. KIPP Student Incentive System (Excerpt) 12 Figure 7. Community of Peace Parent Compact 15 Figure 8. Oglethorpe Parent Volunteer Options 16 Figure 9. Gates Adult Education Program 17 Figure 10. Roxbury Prep Annual Accountability Plan (Excerpts) 18 iv Foreword I am pleased to introduce the third publication in the Innovations in Education series: Successful Charter Schools. This series, published by my Department’s Office of Innovation and Improvement, identifies concrete, real-world ex- amples of innovations flourishing throughout this great land in six important areas: public school choice, supplemen- tal educational services, charter schools, magnet schools, alternative teacher certification, and school leadership. Twelve years after the first charter school was launched, the charter school movement is now entering its adolescence. Like many pre-teens, it’s had its share of growing pains, but I am confident that it is about to hit a growth spurt. That is because charter schools are enormously popular with their primary clients—parents and students—and because they are starting to show promising results in terms of student achievement. The basic tenets of charter schools—give them room to be innovative, hold them accountable for results, and let parents decide if they meet the needs of their children—are perfectly aligned with the historic No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which also focuses on accountability for results in return for more flexibility, and with providing more options for parents than ever before. One of the promises of charter schools is that they can serve as laboratories of innovation—they can be public education’s “R&D” arm. Because they have greater autonomy than traditional public schools, and since they tend to attract pioneering educators, they can try out new approaches to education that, if proven effective, can be trans- planted back into the larger public education system. It is in this spirit that we highlight eight of the most successful charter schools in the United States. These schools were chosen after an exhaustive national search. They were primarily selected because they have demonstrated success over time in boosting student achievement. Surely many more charter schools could have been identified, and these should not be considered “the best” charter schools in the nation. Nevertheless, they are among the best, and each has much to teach other charter schools—and traditional public schools—about teaching and learning, management strategies, staff development, and many other topics. One of the most striking features of these schools is their diversity. While they are all producing impressive results—and meeting the “Adequate Yearly Progress” requirements of NCLB—they span the educational spectrum. Some are fairly traditional, with a laser-like focus on the basics. Others are much more open-ended and “progressive,” with a more flexible approach to learning. None of these schools is a “testing factory,” a stripped down place with no art, music, or time for community. This is an important point, because critics of NCLB—and of standards, testing, and accountability more generally—have voiced concerns that a focus on student achievement will lead schools to do nothing but teach reading and math. These eight schools demonstrate the fallacy of that argument. Excellent schools have always fo- cused on delivering a well-rounded education. Certainly that’s the kind of education the children of our nation’s elite have always enjoyed, and it’s the kind of education all of our children deserve. I congratulate the schools highlighted herein and urge all educators to consider whether the practices described can help your school serve its students better. Let me finish by quoting one of the slogans of the KIPP Academy Houston—which I am proud to have helped get off the ground: “If there’s a better way, we find it.” What a wonderful outlook for our entire public education system—and what a fitting description of the ethos of charter schools. Rod Paige, U.S. Secretary of Education June 2004 v Introduction The promise charter schools hold for public school innovation and reform lies in an unprecedented combination of freedom and accountability. Underwritten with public funds but run independently, charter schools are free from a range of state laws and district policies stipulating what and how they teach, where they can spend their money, and who they can hire and fire. In return, they are held strictly accountable for their academic and financial performance. To represent what such flexibility and ac- countability look like in practice, this guide provides a glimpse into the inner workings of eight American charter schools whose freedom to experiment is raising the level of student learning. Free to experiment how? To lengthen the school day, educational results. “Deliver a quality product,” as Finn mix grades, require dress codes, put teachers on their et al. put it, “or you won’t have students.”1 school boards, double up instruction in core subject areas like math or reading, make parents genuine part- In this guide we take a look at what contributes to ners in family-style school cultures, adopt any instruc- a ”quality product” as well as how eight particular tional practice that will help achieve their missions— charter schools (see figure 1) help their students free, in short, to do whatever it takes to build the skills, achieve success. knowledge, and character traits their students need to The first charter school legislation was passed in Min- succeed in today’s world. nesota in 1991, and as of January 2004, there were By allowing citizens to start new public schools with 2,996 charter schools operating in the United States.2 this kind of autonomy, making them available tuition- Across 40 states and the District of Columbia, about free to any student, and holding them accountable for 750,000 students take part in this form of public edu- results and family satisfaction, proponents hope that cation under varying charter laws.3 this new mix of choice and accountability will not only provide students stronger learning programs than lo- Parents choose to enroll their children in charter schools, cal alternatives, but will also stimulate improvement usually entering a lottery for selection when schools are of the existing public education system. With charter oversubscribed. The schools are free to determine their schools, it is accountability that makes freedom prom- own governing structures, which include parents and ising. No charter is permanent; it must be renewed— teachers as active members. In all these configurations, or revoked—at regular intervals. Continued funding, autonomy gives charter schools the flexibility to allo- which is tied to student enrollment, also depends on cate their budgets; hire staff; and create educational 1 Innovations in Education: Successful Charter Schools programs with curriculum, pedagogy, organizational structures, and ways of involving parents and commu- nity members that may not be typical of their neigh- FIGURE 1.