DOCSLIB.ORG

“Refined Coal”? an Empirical Assessment of a Billion-Dollar Tax Credit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Refined Coal”? an Empirical Assessment of a Billion-Dollar Tax Credit How Clean is “Refined Coal”? An Empirical Assessment of a Billion-Dollar Tax Credit Brian C. Prest and Alan Krupnick Report 19-05 June 2019; rev. Nov. 2019, Feb. 2020, and Aug. 2020 How Clean is “Refined Coal”? An Empirical Assessment of a Billion-Dollar Tax Credit i About the Authors Brian C. Prest Brian Prest is an economist at Resources for the Future specializing in climate change, oil and gas, and electricity markets. Prest uses economic theory and econometric models to understand energy supply dynamics and improve the design of environmental policies. In his current work, he is assessing the impacts of poor incentive structures in electricity markets on plant emissions and negative prices. He is also working to establish an empirical basis for determining discount rates used in the social cost of carbon. His past work includes econometric analysis of the US oil and gas industry, modeling the intertemporal dynamics of climate change policy under policy uncertainty, and assessing household responses to dynamic electricity pricing. His work has appeared in the Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Energy Economics, and The Energy Journal. Prior to joining RFF, Prest earned his PhD at Duke University and previously worked in both the public and private sectors. At the Congressional Budget Office, he developed economic models of various energy sectors to analyze the effects of proposed legislation, including the 2009 Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill and related Clean Electricity Standards. At NERA Economic Consulting, he conducted electricity market modeling, project valuation, and discounted cash flow analysis of various infrastructure investments in the United States, Latin America, Europe, Africa, and Southeast Asia, with a focus on the power sector. Alan Krupnick is a Senior Fellow at Resources for the Future. Krupnick’s research focuses on analyzing environmental and energy issues, in particular, the benefits, costs and design of pollution and energy policies, both in the United States and abroad. He leads RFF’s research on the risks, regulation and economics associated with shale gas development and has developed a portfolio of research on issues surrounding this newly plentiful fuel. Krupnick also served as senior economist on the President‘s Council of Economic Advisers, advising the Clinton administration on environmental and natural resource policy issues. In 2011 he was elected President of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists and earlier that year was named an AERE Fellow. He has served on the Editorial Boards of a number of journals. He co-chaired a federal advisory committee counseling the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the implementation of new ozone and particulate standards. He is a regular member of expert committees from the National Academy of Sciences, the USEPA and various Canadian government and non-governmental institutions. Krupnick also consults with state governments, federal agencies, private corporations, the Canadian government, the European Union, the Asian Development Bank, the World Health Organization, and the World Bank. He received his PhD in Economics from the University of Maryland in 1980. Resources for the Future i About RFF Resources for the Future (RFF) is an independent, nonprofit research institution in Washington, DC. Its mission is to improve environmental, energy, and natural resource decisions through impartial economic research and policy engagement. RFF is committed to being the most widely trusted source of research insights and policy solutions leading to a healthy environment and a thriving economy. The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may differ from those of other RFF experts, its officers, or its directors. Sharing Our Work Our work is available for sharing and adaptation under an Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute our material in any medium or format; you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made, and you may not apply additional restrictions. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. For more information, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. How Clean is “Refined Coal”? An Empirical Assessment of a Billion-Dollar Tax Credit ii How Clean is \Refined Coal"? An Empirical Assessment of a Billion-Dollar Tax Credit Brian C. Prest∗ and Alan Krupnicky August 4, 2020 Abstract US tax law provides nearly $1 billion annually in tax credits for\refined coal", which is supposed to reduce local air pollution. Eligibility for the credit requires firms to demonstrate legally specified emissions reductions for three pollutants. Firms typically demonstrate eligibility through laboratory tests, but results from the lab can differ from those in practice. Using a nationally comprehensive boiler-level panel dataset, we find that emission reductions in practice are only about half of the levels required, and even then only arise when certain pollution controls are installed. We also show that the policy reduces social welfare, resulting in costs more than seven times the benefits, in part because of a \rebound" effect in which the subsidy increases coal use by extending the operational life of some coal plants. Because the tax credit is up for reauthorization in 2021, our work has immediate policy relevance. Keywords: coal, electricity, air pollution, taxes and subsidies ∗Corresponding author. Resources for the Future, 1616 P St NW, Washington, DC 20036. E-mail: prest@rff.org. We appreciate helpful comments, suggestions, and data provided by Jeremy Schreifels and Justine Huetteman, as well as comments from seminar participants at Resources for the Future, the En- vironmental Protection Agency Clean Air Markets Division, the AERE 2019 summer conference, and the ASSA 2020 annual conference, including our discussant Glenn Sheriff. We also appreciate suggestions from Daniel Shawhan and adept research assistance by Paul Picciano in running the E4ST model. The authors received no specific funding for this research. The paper was written while Prest was a Postdoctoral Fellow generously funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. yResources for the Future, 1616 P St NW, Washington, DC 20036. E-mail: krupnick@rff.org. 1 Introduction A significant and growing number of coal-fired power plants in the United States are using coal that has been \refined" prior to burning to supposedly emit less nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and mercury (Hg). This \refined" coal|if it meets certain restrictions and targeted reductions in these pollutants|qualifies for a tax credit of approximately $7 per ton of coal. This subsidy is not small. In 2017 this tax credit cost the US Treasury an estimated $1 billion, and this figure has been growing. The tax credit can be claimed by owners of coal refining facilities, which are often built on-site at power plants but are typically owned by third-party investors, who range from members of the pharmaceutical industry to large financial services companies.1 Because these third party investors who claim the credit are often distinct from the power plant owners, the investors typically have no role in the operation of the power plant. Coal power plant owners do benefit indirectly, however, as refiners pass on a portion of the tax credit to them in exchange for the right to refine the coal before it is burned. As tax instruments have a long history in economics dating back to Pigou (1920) as tools for achieving environmental goals, this policy might be socially valuable if the tax credit was designed well and actually led to the required reductions in these pollutants. In this paper, we find the policy fails on both counts. Not only is the policy's design economically inefficient, but the emissions reductions are often much smaller than the targets stipulated 2 in the tax law. We estimate emission rates of NOx, SO2, and Hg from burning refined coal and its unrefined counterpart. The tax law requires 20 percent reductions in NOx emissions rates (i.e., NOx emitted per unit of thermal energy burned) and 40 percent reductions in SO2 or Hg emissions rates, which are typically verified through laboratory tests unrelated to actual plant operations. By contrast, we estimate that in practice plants achieve negligible reductions in SO2 emissions rates, and the reductions in NOx and Hg rates fall far short of the targets in the tax law. One reason for this is that refined coal is only effective at reducing emissions when certain other pollution control technologies are installed (a necessary, but not suffi- cient, condition), but the tax law does not include any requirements regarding those other technologies. Further, even when those technologies are installed, we find that refined coal still does not achieve the 20 percent and 40 reduction requirements set forth in the tax 1According to Reuters, one firm alone has claimed a total of $850 million from this tax credit over the past decade (McLaughln 2019). 2While there are no academic papers looking at the performance of refined coal, the story in Reuters (McLaughln 2019) reports that total NOx emissions actually increased at many plants but did not control for other factors (such as electricity generation), or estimate emissions rates, which are the target of the refined coal legislation. 1 law. We find no evidence that any particular plant achieves the law's reduction targets{and significant evidence that on average they do not. Our analysis is robust to a number of sensitivity analyses, including considering possible changes in the use of NOx control devices and changes in coal sulfur or mercury content, which we present in the appendix.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle School - Round 14A
    MIDDLE SCHOOL - ROUND 14A TOSS-UP 1) Earth and Space – Short Answer What is the term for sediment with a particle size less than 2 microns? ANSWER: CLAY BONUS 1) Earth and Space – Multiple Choice Which of the following correctly describes the typical progression from dead organic matter to coal? W) Peat, lignite, bituminous [bih-TOOM-in-us], anthracite [AN-thrah-site] X) Lignite, peat, bituminous, anthracite Y) Lignite, bituminous, peat, anthracite Z) Peat, bituminous, anthracite, lignite ANSWER: W) PEAT, LIGNITE, BITUMINOUS, AND ANTHRACITE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TOSS-UP 2) Physical Science – Short Answer Chlorine has an atomic mass of 35.45. Given that chlorine has two naturally-occurring isotopes, chlorine-35 and chlorine-37, then, to the nearest whole number, what percentage of chlorine atoms have a mass number of 35.45? ANSWER: ZERO BONUS 2) Physical Science – Short Answer To the nearest gram, what is the mass of two moles of carbon dioxide? ANSWER: 88 Middle School - Round 14A Page 1 TOSS-UP 3) Math – Short Answer What is the slope of a line perpendicular to the line with equation 7x – 4y = –28? ANSWER: –4/7 BONUS 3) Math – Short Answer A fence is built along the perimeter of a 200-foot-by-300-foot rectangular field. Posts are placed at the four corners and every 5 feet thereafter. How many posts are required? ANSWER: 200 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TOSS-UP 4) Life Science – Short Answer In eukaryotes [YOO-care-ee-oats], DNA and histones are organized into what structures? ANSWER: CHROMOSOMES BONUS 4) Life Science – Short Answer What type of microscopy [my-CRAW-scah-pee] involves the use of a laser, photomultiplier detector, and a pinhole that ensures elimination of out-of-plane light emitted by the sample? ANSWER: CONFOCAL Middle School - Round 14A Page 2 TOSS-UP 5) Energy – Short Answer Researchers at the Joint BioEnergy Institute are studying ionic liquids as a solvent to break down cellulose before biofuel production.
    [Show full text]
  • Views on Coal Liquefaction, Used As a Basis for This Survey Are: M
    L~OLVENT REFINED COAL AND COAL-OIL MIXTURES/ A Thesis presented to The Faculty of the College of Engineering and Technology Ohio University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Avant! E-mbalia; June 13, 1981 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank his advisor, Professor Robert L. Savage, for his advice and guidance in bringing this work to a successful com­ pletion. The author wishes to thank the Pittsburgh Midway Coal Mining Company of Dupont, Washington for supplying SRCI and SRCII samples. Finally, the author also wishes to thank Louella Rich and Diana Miller at the Word Processing Center of The Standard Oil Co, Cleveland, Ohio, for the typing of this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 COAL-OIL MIXTURES 6 Coal-Oil Mixture Technology 6 Stability of Coal-Oil Mixture 7 Testing Procedures Used for Stability Study 8 Density of Coal-Oil Mixture 11 COAL LIQUEFACTION 12 Relations of Coal and Solvent for Extraction 13 Variables Important for Extraction 17 SRC Technology 19 OBJECTIVES 23 EQUIPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 25 Stability Study 25 Viscosity -and Density Measurements of Coal-Oil Mixtures 38 Coal-Oil Mixture Sample Preparation 41 Preparation of Low-Ash Coal 43 Apparatus 47 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 50 Stability Studies 50 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) PAGE Coal Concentration with Height 72 Tuned Circuit Detector 90 Viscosity of Coal-Oil Mixtures 104 Density of Coal-Oil Mixtures 117 Low-Ash Coal 121 CONCLUSIONS 130 RECOMMENDATIONS 132 REFERENCES 134 Appendix A- Derivation of the
    [Show full text]
  • Anthracite Coal 13
    Rock and Mineral 10-Specimen Kit Companion Book Presented by This mineral kit was also made possible through the generosity of the mining companies who supplied the minerals. If you have any questions or comments about this kit please contact the SME Pittsburgh Section Chair at www.smepittsburgh.org. For more information about mining, visit the following web site: www.smepittsburgh.org BSA’s www.scouting.org - search “Mining in Society” SME’s www.mineralseducationcoalition.org/ Updated July 2016 © SME Pittsburgh Section The SME Pittsburgh Section thanks the companies, mines, and individuals who provided mineral samples and donated time or services that made these mineral kits possible. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. CONSOL Energy, Inc. Coolspring Stone Supply John T. Boyd Company Morton Salt Murray Energy Corporation Newmont Mining Corporation Reed Gold Mine (State of North Carolina) Steelhead Specialty Minerals United States Gypsum Company US Steel Corporation United Taconite (Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc.) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 MINERAL IDENTIFICATION 5 FUELS 10 Bituminous Coal 12 Anthracite Coal 13 BASE METAL ORES 14 Iron Ore 15 Copper Ore 16 PRECIOUS METALS 17 Gold Ore 18 ROCKS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 19 Gypsum 21 Limestone 22 Marble 23 Salt 24 Zeolite 25 Note: many of the images reproduced here are from Wikipedia which allows non commercial use or from the Minerals Education Coalition web site http://www.mineralseducationcoalition.org/minerals. INTRODUCTION The effect rocks and minerals have on our daily lives is not always obvious, but this book will help explain how essential they really are. If you don’t think you come in contact with minerals every day, think about these facts below and see if you change your mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Lignite Mining Development Strategy
    Energy Strat egy and P olicy of Kos ovo White Paper LIGNITE MINING DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY STATEM ENT OF PRINCIPL E Recognizing that lignite will remain the principal fuel for electricity generation in the long term, the use of indigenous coal is encouraged in an environmentally and economically responsible manner, as well as reclamation of lands previously disturbed by mining. BACKGROUND Lignite is of outstanding importance to electricity generation in Kosovo. It contributes to 97% of the total electricity generation, 3% being hydro based pow er generation. Considering all the potential sources for pow er generation in Kosovo, coal safely maintains its leading position. The Kosovo lignite mines are operated at one of the most favorable lignite RESOURCE deposits in Europe due to its geological conditions. With an average ADVANTAGE ! stripping ratio of 1.7 m3 of w aste to 1 ton of coal, coal production at Kosovo mines could supply very competitive fuel to the pow er plants, compared to Sufficient for electricity international fuel sources and energy prices. The total estimated generation in decades economically exploited resources of approx. 10,000 Mt represent one of the to come. richest lignite sources in Europe, w hich would allow ambitious pow er generation and expansion schemes in the forth coming decades. Coal supply can rise in correlation w ith increasing electricity consumption. Coal can be supplied w ith the highest degree of security and with predictable price levels. By this, Kosovo can take advantage of its large reserves and of its location in centre of South East Europe, w here lack of electricity is to be expected in the mid to long ter m period.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Characteristics
    CCTR Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research COAL CHARACTERISTICS CCTR Basic Facts File # 8 Brian H. Bowen, Marty W. Irwin The Energy Center at Discovery Park Purdue University CCTR, Potter Center, 500 Central Drive West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022 http://www.purdue.edu/dp/energy/CCTR/ Email: [email protected] October 2008 1 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL FORMATION As geological processes apply pressure to peat over time, it is transformed successively into different types of coal Source: Kentucky Geological Survey http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/images/peatcoal.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/coalform.htm&h=354&w=579&sz= 20&hl=en&start=5&um=1&tbnid=NavOy9_5HD07pM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=134&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcoal%2Bphotos%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX 2 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL ANALYSIS Elemental analysis of coal gives empirical formulas such as: C137H97O9NS for Bituminous Coal C240H90O4NS for high-grade Anthracite Coal is divided into 4 ranks: (1) Anthracite (2) Bituminous (3) Sub-bituminous (4) Lignite Source: http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=4929705428518&lang=en-US&mkt=en-US&FORM=CVRE8 3 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR BITUMINOUS COAL Bituminous Coal: Great pressure results in the creation of bituminous, or “soft” coal. This is the type most commonly used for electric power generation in the U.S. It has a higher heating value than either lignite or sub-bituminous, but less than that of anthracite. Bituminous coal
    [Show full text]
  • 201520003 [Third Party Communication: Release Date: 5/15/2015 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY] Index Number: 45.00-00 Person to Contact: ------, ID No
    Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 Number: 201520003 [Third Party Communication: Release Date: 5/15/2015 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY] Index Number: 45.00-00 Person To Contact: ----------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. ----------- ------------------------------------------- Telephone Number: --------------------- -------------------- ------------------------------- Refer Reply To: CC:PSI:B06 PLR-128569-14 Date: December 10, 2014 LEGEND Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------- Parent = ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Corp A = --------------------------------------------------------------- Corp B = ------------------ Corp C = -------------------------------------------- Corp D = --------------------------------------------------------- Corp E = ------------------------------- State = ------------ Facility = ---------------------------------------- Power Plant = --------------------------------- Location 1 = ----------------------- Date 1 = --------------------- Date 2 = -------------------------- A = ----------------------------------- a = --- b = --- c = --- d = --- e = ----- Process = ----------- Process A = -------------- Process B = -------------- PLR-128569-14 2 Dear -------------: This is in response to your request, submitted by your authorized representative on Date 7, to supplement ruling PLR-141119-11 dated November 30, 2011, concerning the federal income tax consequences of the transaction described
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Coal Report July–September 2020
    Quarterly Coal Report July–September 2020 January 2021 Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy www.eia.gov Was hington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report July–September 2020 i January 2021 Contacts This publication was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). You can request general information about the data in this report by emailing [email protected]. You can send questions about coal statistics to the Office of Stakeholder Outreach and Communications at 202- 586-8800 or at [email protected]. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Quarterly Coal Report July–September 2020 ii January 2021 Preface EIA publishes this report to fulfill data collection and dissemination responsibilities under the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-275), as amended. The Quarterly Coal Report (QCR) provides information about U.S. coal production, exports, imports, receipts, prices, consumption, quality, stocks, and refined coal data to a wide audience, including Congress, federal and state agencies, the coal industry, and the general public. In addition, the QCR offers U.S. coke production, consumption, stocks, imports, and exports data. The third-quarter 2020 QCR includes detailed quarterly coal data for July 2020 to September 2020 and aggregated quarterly historical coal data for 2014 through third- quarter 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Coal Phaseout Law FACT SHEET
    The German Coal Phaseout Law FACT SHEET • On Friday, July 3, the German parliament passed the coal phaseout !"#$%&'"&"#()'$*+',-./0'1&"#()'234#5"26'27%#"'*&'&"8'"9"58#*5*8)'("&"#%8*3& law. It designs the path to phase out hard coal and lignite-fired electricity generation (combined ~30% of German electricity !$/&6"%'90:6% generation in 2019) by 2038 at the latest. ;7 +,- • The law requires to pay compensation for companies closing ,45.'90:6% 72D'+,-''' their coal plants as well as to regions where coal has a significant economic effect. In addition, also electricity-intensive companies <656:"=&6) 34(54#6 2>? +,- will receive compensation due to foreseen increase of power prices 781 +,- following from coal phase-out. !"# F40G")) D;'+,- • The coal will be substituted with renewable energy sources and !"# $%&'()*"#+ natural gas. The government’s target is to increase the share of -"%.'/0"& renewables in electricity production to 65% by 2030. 12 +,- E0&"% D1'+,- Launched in the 1990s, the Energiewende is an evolving concept !"#$%"&'(") -C.%090:6% 28'+,- ** +,- which aims at reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), increasing @4&'"5.'0#A6%'B0))4&'B$6&) energy efficiency and the share of renewables while phasing out 22 +,- nuclear power. While originally controversial in German politics, !"#$%&'()*+,()#-.&/0&$12-.(.&$(+-&$34&(#-.(,2//&$54$6/%7286(&9:9 the Energiewende has gained broad political consensus across all parties since the 2011 nuclear accident in Fukushima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
    [Show full text]
  • Production Tax Credit for Refined Coal Part
    Production Tax Credit for Refined Coal Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Notice 2009-90 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This notice sets forth interim guidance pending the issuance of regulations relating to the tax credit under § 45 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for refined coal. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND Sections 45(c)(7), (d)(8), and (e)(8) of the Code provide definitions and rules relating to the tax credit for refined coal (the refined coal credit). Section 45(e)(8) provides that the refined coal credit increases a taxpayer’s credit determined under the other provisions of § 45. The credit is allowed for qualified refined coal (1) produced by the taxpayer at a refined coal production facility during the ten-year period beginning on the date the facility is originally placed in service, and (2) sold by the taxpayer to an unrelated person during that ten-year period. Sections 45(c)(7), (d)(8), and (e)(8) were added to the Code by sections 710(a), (b)(1), and (b)(2), respectively, of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, 2 Pub. L. No. 108-357. These provisions were amended by sections 403(t) and 412(j)(1) and (2) of the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-135, and by sections 101 and 108 of the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008, Division B of Pub. L. No. 110-343. SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS, ETC. The following definitions apply for purposes of this notice: .01 Refined Coal. (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this section 3.01, the term “refined coal” means fuel that-- (a) is a liquid, gaseous, or solid fuel produced from coal (including lignite) or high carbon fly ash, including (except to the extent inconsistent with section 3.01(1)(b) of this notice) such fuel used as a feedstock; (b) is sold by the taxpayer (producer), to an unrelated person, with the reasonable expectation that it will be used for the purpose of producing steam; and (c) is certified by the taxpayer as resulting (when used in the production of steam) in a qualified emission reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Energy Uses of Coal
    CCC/ 291 NOVEMBER 2018 NON-ENERGY USES OF COAL DR IAN REID NON-ENERGY USES OF COAL IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E APSLEY HOUSE, 176 UPPER RICHMOND R OAD LONDON, SW15 2SH UNITED KINGDOM +44[0]20 3905 3870 WWW.IEA-COAL.ORG AUTHOR DR IAN REID IEA CCC REPORT NUMBER CCC/291 ISBN 978–92–9029–614–0 © IEA CLEAN COAL CENTRE PUBLICATION DATE NOVEMBER 2018 3 IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E – NON-ENERGY USES OF C OAL PREFACE This report has been produced by the IEA Clean Coal Centre and is based on a survey and analysis of published literature, and on information gathered in discussions with interested organisations and individuals. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. It should be understood that the views expressed in this report are our own, and are not necessarily shared by those who supplied the information, nor by our member organisations. The IEA Clean Coal Centre was established in 1975 and has contracting parties and sponsors from: Australia, China, the European Commission, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, the UAE, the UK and the USA. The overall objective of the IEA Clean Coal Centre is to continue to provide our members, the IEA Working Party on Fossil Fuels and other interested parties with independent information and analysis on all coal-related trends compatible with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. We consider all aspects of coal production, transport, processing and utilisation, within the rationale for balancing security of supply, affordability and environmental issues. These include efficiency improvements, lowering greenhouse and non-greenhouse gas emissions, reducing water stress, financial resourcing, market issues, technology development and deployment, ensuring poverty alleviation through universal access to electricity, sustainability, and social licence to operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Coal Consumption and Quality Report U.S
    Quarterly Coal Consumption and Quality Report U.S. Department of Energy Form Approved Energy Information Administration Manufacturing and Transformation/Processing Coal Plants and OMB No. 1905-0167 Form EIA-3 Expires: xx/xx/xxxx (April 2011) Commercial and Institutional Coal Users Burden: 1.25 Hours Page 1 Respondent ID # Please read the instructions provided before completing this form. NOTICE: This report is mandatory under the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-275). Failure to comply may result in criminal fines, civil penalties and other sanctions as provided by law. For further information concerning sanctions and data protections see the provision on sanctions and the provision concerning the disclosure of information in the instructions. Title 18 USC 1001 makes it a criminal offense for any person knowingly and willingly to make to any Agency or Department of the United States any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements as to any matter within its jurisdiction. I. Identification. Please read the instructions for Section I on page 11 before completing this section. A. Company Information Name of Company Contact Person: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Company Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Company Street Address: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Company City, State, Zip: _________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Solutions Acquisition and Refined Coal Update
    Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. Nasdaq: ADES Advancing Cleaner Energy Carbon Solutions Acquisition and Refined Coal Update November 16, 2018 © 2018 Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. SAFE HARBOR This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which provides a “safe harbor” for such statements in certain circumstances. The forward-looking statements include estimated future RC cash flows, projections on ADA Carbon Solutions, LLC (“Carbon Solutions”) revenues, Carbon Solutions’ EBITDA, amount of operating synergies from the potential combination and future RC cash flows, expectations about Carbon Solutions' business opportunities, timing of the closing of the proposed acquisition, the ability to monetize deferred tax assets, and potential transactions with tax-equity investors. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including, but not limited to, future demand for Carbon Solutions’ products, our ability to cost-effectively integrate Carbon Solutions and recognize anticipated synergies, the Company’s ability to secure appropriate financing, timing of new and pending regulations and any legal challenges to or extensions of compliance dates of them; as well as other factors relating to our business, as described in our filings with the SEC, with particular emphasis on the risk factor disclosures contained in those filings. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and to consult filings we have made and will make with the SEC for additional discussion concerning risks and uncertainties that may apply to our business and the ownership of our securities.
    [Show full text]