DOCSLIB.ORG

100 Years MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE for PHYSICS Editorial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
100 Years MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE for PHYSICS Editorial 100 years MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PHYSICS Editorial POISED f o r n e w DISCOVERIES Our Institute is celebrating its 100th birthday – Prof. Dr. Allen Caldwell and with this magazine we want to give you a Managing Director brief and entertaining glimpse into our history, at the Max Planck Institute for Physics our research past and present, and some of the people who worked here at various times. Max Planck, Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg – scientists who are very closely intertwined with our history and are still revered by physicists and non-physicists alike. Without a doubt, the largest part of our universe still lies hidden. The matter we are familiar with covers only about five percent. What does »dark matter« consist of? And even the constituents we know about still puzzle us: Why is there more matter than antimatter? Is there a unified theory of all the natural forces – gravitation, electromagnetism, and the weak and strong interactions? We are prepared for new discoveries, in both theoretical and experimental physics, and look ahead to the future with high expectations. Table of Contents 06 History 06 100 years of research at the Max Planck Institute for Physics 12 Research Particle physics: How scientists investigate the tiniest building blocks of the universe 12 26 Profiles People who do research and work at the Institute 26 38 Basic research Research without immediate practical application – to what end? 38 42 What are the next steps? 42 The projects of the future 43 Imprint Abbreviations, contact, photo credits 43 The Universe 04 The evolution of the universe Formation of elementary particles and fundamental forces When and how did Background radiation (380,000 years) elementary particles form? What are the First stars properties of matter? How can we explain Evolution of galaxies, stars and planets physical phenomena which are not yet understood? The Max Planck Institute for Physics is pursuing these questions – with the aim of solving BIG BANG the mysteries of the universe. 13.7 billion years Guiding Principle 05 »RESEARCH ON THE smallest scale TO UNDERSTAND THE grand scale« Guiding principle of the research at the Max Planck Institute for Physics History 100 years MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PHYSICS 06 THE INSTITUTE WAS FOUNDED under the name of the »Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physics« before the end of the First World War. It was initially housed in Albert Einstein’s living room, before it moved into its own building in Berlin-Dahlem in 1937. The research covered a broad spectrum encompassing relativity theory, quantum, nuclear, low temperature and high- voltage physics. In 2017, the Max Planck Institute for Physics concentrates on particle and astroparticle physics. 3 The Swedish king presents the Nobel Prize to Heisenberg 1 The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin 2 Werner Heisenberg as a young man 1 3 07 9, 1922 of the German military of the German military , then professor at the University 1, 1917 2 awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for his services for his services in Physics the Nobel Prize awarded built in Berlin-Dahlem. built in Berlin-Dahlem. of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physics, Berlin. Wilhelm Institute for Physics, of the Kaiser ctober of Leipzig, awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics. in Physics. the Nobel Prize awarded of Leipzig, New Institute Debye. Director: Peter 1932 (awarded 1933) Heisenberg Werner 1936/37 1939 Placed under the command of with the aim ordnance office (uranium research fission). nuclear for application of fields possible investigating O Foundation Einstein (until 1933). Albert Director: November Einstein Albert to theoretical physics. Albert Einstein Existing Existing fundamental theories: fundamental Left: · Quantum mechanics theories: And colleagues (Heisenberg 1923) on November 11, Electrodynamics, 1931 in Berlin 1917 · Existence of the neutrino Theory of Relativity 1940 (from left to right: (Pauli 1930) Walther Nernst, Known particles: – Albert Einstein, · Theory of radioactive beta Max Planck, Protons, Electrons decay caused by weak Robert Millikan, interaction (Fermi 1934) Max von Laue) World view of cosmology: Known particles: Planets, Stars, 1920 Neutrons (Chadwick 1932), Galaxies, Universe Muons, Positrons, Pions assumed to be (Anderson 1932/36) static World view of cosmology: Expanding universe (Friedmann 1922, Lemaitre 1927, Hubble 1929) 5 Workshop at the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Göttingen 4 After the German surrender, allied forces 5 A staff member evaluates search the Haigerloch research site particle collisions 08 4 for theoretical physics for theoretical physics fission material Max Planck Institute for Max Planck Hechingen Hechingen , Werner Heisenberg again Director. Heisenberg again Werner , 5 moved to moved are dropped. Institute returned are dropped. Institute returned 1945 two departments: – by American and Soviet troops. American and Soviet by Heisenberg becomes Director. in Göttingen in Göttingen atomic bomb For the first For time, and experimental Weizsäcker) von (head: Carl Friedrich Wirtz). (head: Karl physics Loss of equipment and library; internment Directors Loss and several Institute members. April/May 1945 Occupation 1946 New building and reopened as Physics for an (see box). Wilhelm Society to the Kaiser Werner in the southwest of Germany. and Haigerloch 1942 uranium 235 as to enrich Attempts 1943 of the Institute Parts What was Werner Heisenberg’s role in the uranium program of the Third Reich? Together with other scientists, including In 1941, Heisenberg had several discussions Otto Hahn and Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, with his Danish friend and mentor Niels he was called up to work on the German Bohr on the issue of »nuclear weapons«. In 1945 army weapons program. In the uranium addition, between 1950 and 1960 Bohr wrote project initiated there, the researchers were several letters to Heisenberg, but never sent – to investigate possible applications for them. Studying these sources does not nuclear fission – whereby the focus was allow a final assessment of Heisenberg’s certainly on developing an atomic bomb. role in the uranium project either. Attempts to enrich uranium 235 and thus to Klaus Gottstein, Emeritus Scientific Member 1933 make it »critical« were abandoned in 1942. of the Max Planck Institute for Physics and a Niels Bohr and There are different interpretations as to how scientific companion of Heisenberg for Werner Heisenberg this came about, however: Some science many years, discusses the most important 1924 historians are convinced that Heisenberg questions and answers in his article deliberately delayed the uranium project so »Werner Heisenberg and the German as not to provide the Nazi government with Uranium Project (1939 – 1945). Myths and atomic weapons. According to other Facts«. The text is published at authors, the group working with Heisenberg www.heisenberg-gesellschaft.de. There are failed purely and simply because the task also further references to biographical was too difficult. publications. 6 The new building of the Max Planck Institute for Physics 8 Clockwise from top left: Hans-Peter Dürr, Norbert Schmitz, Léon Van Hove, Klaus Gottstein, Ulrich Stierlin 7 Centaur-type rockets transported scientific instruments into space 8 : 09 7 made made 1, 1958 Max Planck Institute for Physics Max Planck 1, 1971 Director: Werner Heisenberg (retired 1970). Werner Director: Board of Directors 6 . Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics Institute for Extraterrestrial Institute for Plasma Physics 28, 1960 , father of supersymmetry, appointed appointed , father of supersymmetry, Institute for Astrophysics Max Planck Institute for Physics and Astrophysics. Astrophysics. and Institute for Physics Max Planck September as the to Munich Relocation October the first For time, a Members up of several Scientific manages the October 1979 The 1990 Wess Julius Institute for Physics. as Director at the Max Planck and Astrophysics relocates to Garching. June Independent 1963 of the Founding of space with on the physics Research of balloons, probes and satellites. the aid becomes a spin-off in the form of GmbH. Existing fundamental theories: Existing fundamental theories: · Parity violation in weak interaction · Development of the Standard Model (Lee, Wang, Wu 1956/57) of particle physics (Glashow, Salam, Weinberg) – order is brought to the · Dark matter (Zwicky) 1980 1960 particle zoo! · Nucleosynthesis (formation of – – · Quark model nuclei, e. g. helium, lithium) in the universe · Quantum chromodynamics Known particles: Known particles: Kaons, lambda particles – the term Quarks (up, down, strange, charm, 1960 1940 »particle zoo« is coined bottom), Leptons, Vector bosons (W, Z), Gluon as exchange particle of the strong World view of cosmology: interaction Big Bang theories for the creation of World view of cosmology: the universe (Gamow, Bethe) Discovery of cosmic background radiation (»echo of the Big Bang«, Penzias, Wilson 1964) 9 CRESST uses crystals of calcium tungstate to detect dark matter particles 11 Cleanroom laboratory at the MPI for Physics: Installing a component for the GERDA experiment 10 The ATLAS detector at CERN 10 10 »Max Planck Institute for Physics« Institute for Physics« »Max Planck is established. string theory research field string theory research ATLAS experiment ATLAS 9 phenomenology inaugurated – the second follows in 2009. 1991 CRESST experiment CRESST to search for dark matter begins. begins. for dark matter to search Teshima. head: Director Masahiro Current at CERN. Head: Director Siegfried
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hendrik Antoon Lorentz's Struggle with Quantum Theory A. J
    Hendrik Antoon Lorentz’s struggle with quantum theory A. J. Kox Archive for History of Exact Sciences ISSN 0003-9519 Volume 67 Number 2 Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. (2013) 67:149-170 DOI 10.1007/s00407-012-0107-8 1 23 Your article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works, as long as the author of the original work is cited. You may self- archive this article on your own website, an institutional repository or funder’s repository and make it publicly available immediately. 1 23 Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. (2013) 67:149–170 DOI 10.1007/s00407-012-0107-8 Hendrik Antoon Lorentz’s struggle with quantum theory A. J. Kox Received: 15 June 2012 / Published online: 24 July 2012 © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract A historical overview is given of the contributions of Hendrik Antoon Lorentz in quantum theory. Although especially his early work is valuable, the main importance of Lorentz’s work lies in the conceptual clarifications he provided and in his critique of the foundations of quantum theory. 1 Introduction The Dutch physicist Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1853–1928) is generally viewed as an icon of classical, nineteenth-century physics—indeed, as one of the last masters of that era. Thus, it may come as a bit of a surprise that he also made important contribu- tions to quantum theory, the quintessential non-classical twentieth-century develop- ment in physics. The importance of Lorentz’s work lies not so much in his concrete contributions to the actual physics—although some of his early work was ground- breaking—but rather in the conceptual clarifications he provided and his critique of the foundations and interpretations of the new ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Mistakes
    Einstein’s Mistakes Einstein was the greatest genius of the Twentieth Century, but his discoveries were blighted with mistakes. The Human Failing of Genius. 1 PART 1 An evaluation of the man Here, Einstein grows up, his thinking evolves, and many quotations from him are listed. Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at 14 Einstein at 26 Einstein at 42 3 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at age 61 (1940) 4 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Born in Ulm, Swabian region of Southern Germany. From a Jewish merchant family. Had a sister Maja. Family rejected Jewish customs. Did not inherit any mathematical talent. Inherited stubbornness, Inherited a roguish sense of humor, An inclination to mysticism, And a habit of grüblen or protracted, agonizing “brooding” over whatever was on its mind. Leading to the thought experiment. 5 Portrait in 1947 – age 68, and his habit of agonizing brooding over whatever was on its mind. He was in Princeton, NJ, USA. 6 Einstein the mystic •“Everyone who is seriously involved in pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man..” •“When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe that way?” •His roguish sense of humor was always there. •When asked what will be his reactions to observational evidence against the bending of light predicted by his general theory of relativity, he said: •”Then I would feel sorry for the Good Lord. The theory is correct anyway.” 7 Einstein: Mathematics •More quotations from Einstein: •“How it is possible that mathematics, a product of human thought that is independent of experience, fits so excellently the objects of physical reality?” •Questions asked by many people and Einstein: •“Is God a mathematician?” •His conclusion: •“ The Lord is cunning, but not malicious.” 8 Einstein the Stubborn Mystic “What interests me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the world” Some broadcasters expunged the comment from the soundtrack because they thought it was blasphemous.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman
    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years of Quantum Hall Effect
    S´eminaire Poincar´e2 (2004) 1 – 16 S´eminaire Poincar´e 25 Years of Quantum Hall Effect (QHE) A Personal View on the Discovery, Physics and Applications of this Quantum Effect Klaus von Klitzing Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Festk¨orperforschung Heisenbergstr. 1 D-70569 Stuttgart Germany 1 Historical Aspects The birthday of the quantum Hall effect (QHE) can be fixed very accurately. It was the night of the 4th to the 5th of February 1980 at around 2 a.m. during an experiment at the High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Grenoble. The research topic included the characterization of the electronic transport of silicon field effect transistors. How can one improve the mobility of these devices? Which scattering processes (surface roughness, interface charges, impurities etc.) dominate the motion of the electrons in the very thin layer of only a few nanometers at the interface between silicon and silicon dioxide? For this research, Dr. Dorda (Siemens AG) and Dr. Pepper (Plessey Company) provided specially designed devices (Hall devices) as shown in Fig.1, which allow direct measurements of the resistivity tensor. Figure 1: Typical silicon MOSFET device used for measurements of the xx- and xy-components of the resistivity tensor. For a fixed source-drain current between the contacts S and D, the potential drops between the probes P − P and H − H are directly proportional to the resistivities ρxx and ρxy. A positive gate voltage increases the carrier density below the gate. For the experiments, low temperatures (typically 4.2 K) were used in order to suppress dis- turbing scattering processes originating from electron-phonon interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Klaus Von Klitzing
    Curriculum Vitae Professor Dr. Klaus von Klitzing Name: Klaus von Klitzing Born: 28 June 1943 Major Scientific Interests: Solid State Research, Experimental Solid Physics, Low Dimensional Electron Systems, Quantum Hall Effect Nobel Prize in Physics 1985 Academic and Professional Career since 1985 Director at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research and Honorary Professor at Stuttgart University, Germany 1980 - 1984 Professor at the Technical University Munich, Germany 1978 Habilitation 1972 Ph.D. in Physics 1969 - 1980 University of Würzburg, Germany 1962 - 1969 Diploma in Physics Technical University Braunschweig, Germany Functions in Scientific Societies and Committees (Selection) 2011 Scientific Advisory Board Graphene Flagship 2008 Scientific Committee Bayer Climate Award Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina www.leopoldina.org 1 2007 EURAMET Research Council 2006 Board of Trustees “Institute of Advanced Studies” of TUM 2005 Jury Member START-Wittgenstein Program Austria 2005 Scientific Committee International Solvay Institutes 2000 NTT - Basic Research Laboratory Advisory Board 1992 Bord of Trustees of the German Museum Munich, Germany 1989 Bord of Trustees of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig Honours and Awarded Memberships (Selection) 2019 Member of Orden Pour le Mérite 2012 TUM Distinguished Affiliated Professor 2011 Honorary Degree of the National University of Mongolia 2011 Honorary Degree of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 2010 Honorary Member of the Deutsche Hochschulverband
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Einstein's Science And
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 63 (1997) Giuseppe Castagnetti, Hubert Goenner, Jürgen Renn, Tilman Sauer, and Britta Scheideler Foundation in Disarray: Essays on Einstein’s Science and Politics in the Berlin Years ISSN 0948-9444 PREFACE This collection of essays is based on a series of talks given at the Boston Colloquium for Philosophy of Science, March 3 – 4, 1997, under the title “Einstein in Berlin: The First Ten Years.“ The meeting was organized by the Center for Philosophy and History of Science at Boston University and the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, and co-sponsored by the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Although the three essays do not directly build upon one another, we have nevertheless decided to present them in a single preprint for two reasons. First, they result from a project that grew out of an earlier cooperation inaugurated by the Berlin Working Group “Albert Einstein.“ This group was part of the research center “Development and Socialization“ under the direction of Wolfgang Edel- stein at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education.1 The Berlin Working Group, directed by Peter Damerow and Jürgen Renn, was sponsored by the Senate of Berlin. Its aim was to pursue research on Einstein in Berlin with particular attention to the relation between his science and its context. The research activities of the Working Group are now being continued at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science partly, in cooperation with Michel Janssen, John Norton, and John Stachel.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Planck Society's Careful Planning Reaps Benefits
    briefing Within the east German research insti- “We were not treated unfairly, according tutes of the Leibniz Society, three-quarters of to western rules,” he says. “But the rules were institute directors, and over a third of depart- ost see the against us. For example, the selection process ment heads, come from west Germany. The West German was in English, whereas we could have done directors of the three new national research M better in Russian, and publication record was centres are west Germans, and 55 per cent of ‘takeover’ as having a major criterion, whereas we had had few department heads are from west Germany chances to publish in western journals.” with a further eight per cent coming from been inevitable There were also cultural differences. “We abroad. all spoke German, yet after 40 years of cultur- Even more extreme ratios exist in the 20 peared for the good of east Germany’s scien- al divide it was hard to really talk to each Max Planck institutes, with only three of the tific future, he says. At his own Institute for other,” says Horst Franz Kern, dean of sci- 240 institute directors and department Plant Biochemistry, from which he retired as ence at the University of Marburg, who heads being east Germans. In contrast to director at the end of 1997, “even those hired chaired the Wissenschaftsrat’s committee on universities and other research organiza- on temporary grant money come increas- biology and medicine at the time of the tions, 40 per cent of these top jobs are occu- ingly from west Germany”.
    [Show full text]
  • Klaus Von Klitzing 1985 NOBEL PRIZE in PHYSICS Yoseph Imry, Tel Aviv (School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University)
    europhysics BULLETIN OF THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY news J.A. Volume 16 Number 11/12 November/December 1985 Klaus von Klitzing 1985 NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS Yoseph Imry, Tel Aviv (School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University) An October 16, 1985, the Swedish meanwhile been surpassed by an order Academy of Sciences announced the of magnitude and the result was found award of the 1985 Nobel Prize in Physics to be universal — independent of mate­ to Klaus von Klitzing of the Max-Planck rial and sample properties. The plateaux Institute in Stuttgart, for the discovery were also observed by Kawaji and of the Quantized Hall Effect (QHE). The Wakabayashi 2). QHE was reported in 1980 in a paper1) Besides its sheer beauty, this striking by von Klitzing in collaboration with G. result touches upon several topics of Dorda of Siemens and M. Pepper of fundamental interest, has important ap­ Cambridge. As shown in Fig. 1, the Hall plications to precision measurements Klaus von Klitzing now aged 42 began his conductance Gxy of a 2D electron gas in and metrology, has motivated and will physics studies at the Technical University an MOS was found, for finite ranges of undoubtedly lead to novel develop­ in Braunschweig and then in 1972 moved to the gate voltage in which the regular ments. Moreover, it relies on the physics the University of Wurzburg gaining his Habi­ conductance, Gxx, was severely reduc­ of devices of great industrial interest 3). litation in 1978 after spending a period at the ed, to be quantized with plateaux having Before explaining the effect briefly University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for the Gentle Tremble
    Flashback_Gravitational Waves The Search for the Gentle Tremble Gravitational waves are some of the most spectacular predictions of the 1915 general theory of relativity. However, it wasn’t until half a century later that physicist Joseph Weber attempted to track them down. In the early 1970s, Max Planck scientists also began working in this research field, and developed second-generation detectors. The groundwork laid by these pioneers meant the waves in space-time ceased to be just figments of the imagination: in September 2015 they were finally detected. TEXT HELMUT HORNUNG Albert Einstein is beset by doubt: it will never be possible to de- of relativity ultimately benefits gravitational waves, too, which tect gravitational waves – the tremble in space-time is simply too strike a chord with at least one physicist: Joseph Weber. weak! Yet it was he himself who had postulated their existence, Born in 1919 in New Jersey, the researcher at the University of which follows from the general theory of relativity he put forward Maryland has an idea for a simple experiment: he suspends an in- in November 1915. A short time later, in 1916 and again in 1918, he credibly heavy aluminum cylinder – 1.5 meters long and 60 centi- devotes a paper to this phenomenon. meters across – in a steel wire loop and attaches piezo sensors to Two decades later, he suddenly has a change of heart: “I have its middle to register oscillations. The whole test rig is housed in been working with a young colleague [Nathan Rosen] and we have a vacuum chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • A Solution of the Interpretation Problem of Lorentz Transformations
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 July 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0705.v1 Article A Solution of the Interpretation Problem of Lorentz Transformations Grit Kalies* HTW University of Applied Sciences Dresden; 1 Friedrich-List-Platz, D-01069 Dresden, [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected], Tel.: +49-351-462-2552 Abstract: For more than one hundred years, scientists dispute the correct interpretation of Lorentz transformations within the framework of the special theory of relativity of Albert Einstein. On the one hand, the changes in length, time and mass with increasing velocity are interpreted as apparent due to the observer dependence within special relativity. On the other hand, real changes are described corresponding to the experimental evidence of mass increase in particle accelerators or of clock delay. This ambiguity is accompanied by an ongoing controversy about valid Lorentz-transformed thermodynamic quantities such as entropy, pressure and temperature. In this paper is shown that the interpretation problem of the Lorentz transformations is genuinely anchored within the postulates of special relativity and can be solved on the basis of the thermodynamic approach of matter-energy equivalence, i.e. an energetic distinction between matter and mass. It is suggested that the velocity-dependent changes in state quantities are real in each case, in full agreement with the experimental evidence. Keywords: interpretation problem; Lorentz transformation; special relativity; thermodynamics; potential energy; space; time; entropy; non-mechanistic ether theory © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 July 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0705.v1 2 of 25 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Spectroscope
    Nuncius 18, fasc. 2 (2003), 808-823 AN UNCONVINCING TRANSFORMATION? MICHELSON’S INTERFERENTIAL SPECTROSCOPY Sean F. Johnston∗ Introduction Albert Abraham Michelson (1852-1931), the American optical physicist best known for his precise determination of the velocity of light and for his experiments concerning aether drift, is less often acknowledged as the creator of new spectroscopic instrumentation and new spectroscopies. His researches on the velocity of light (1878-9) and aether drift (1881-7)1 exploited his excellence in precision optical measurement and metrology. They were closely followed by work on standards of length (1887- 93) and the diameters of stars (1890-1). The measurement of the standard meter brought Michelson to the exploration of spectroscopy. He devised a new method of light analysis relying upon his favourite instrument – a particular configuration of optical interferometer – and published investigations of spectral line separation, Doppler-broadening and simple high-resolution spectra (1887-1898). Contemporaries did not pursue his method. Michelson himself discarded the technique by the end of the decade, promoting a new device, the ‘echelon spectroscope’, as a superior instrument. High-resolution spectroscopy was taken up by others at the turn of the century using the echelon, Fabry-Pérot etalon and similar instruments. Michelson’s ‘Light Wave Analysis’ was largely forgotten, but was ‘rediscovered’ c1950 and developed over the following three decades into a technique rechristened ‘Fourier transform spectroscopy’.2
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Quant-Ph/0510180V1 24 Oct 2005 Einstein and the Quantum
    TIFR/TH/05-39 27.9.2005 Einstein and the Quantum Virendra Singh Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005, India Abstract We review here the main contributions of Einstein to the quantum theory. To put them in perspective we first give an account of Physics as it was before him. It is followed by a brief account of the problem of black body radiation which provided the context for Planck to introduce the idea of quantum. Einstein’s revolutionary paper of 1905 on light-quantum hypothesis is then described as well as an application of this idea to the photoelectric effect. We next take up a discussion of Einstein’s other contributions to old quantum theory. These include (i) his theory of specific heat of solids, which was the first application of quantum theory to matter, (ii) his discovery of wave-particle duality for light and (iii) Einstein’s A and B coefficients relating to the probabilities of emission and absorption of light by atomic systems and his discovery of radiation stimulated emission of light which provides the basis for laser action. We then describe Einstein’s contribution to quantum statistics viz Bose- Einstein Statistics and his prediction of Bose-Einstein condensation of a boson gas. Einstein played a pivotal role in the discovery of Quantum mechanics and this is briefly mentioned. After 1925 Einstein’s contributed mainly to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics. We arXiv:quant-ph/0510180v1 24 Oct 2005 choose to discuss here (i) his Ensemble (or Statistical) Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and (ii) the discovery of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlations and the EPR theorem on the conflict between Einstein-Locality and the completeness of the formalism of Quantum Mechanics.
    [Show full text]