DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplemental Ecms Advanced Information – January 28, 2016 (All Work to Be Completed to Appear in the Proposal) Philadelphia Co

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplemental Ecms Advanced Information – January 28, 2016 (All Work to Be Completed to Appear in the Proposal) Philadelphia Co SUPPLEMENTAL ECMS ADVANCED INFORMATION – JANUARY 28, 2016 (ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED TO APPEAR IN THE PROPOSAL) Updated January 8, 2016 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY – SR 0000(LS1) #105118 PROPOSAL:$33.60 The description and location of the project is as follows: High priority replacement of parts or repairs to large sign structures and other miscellaneous construction, as indicated on the approved drawings included in the bid package for VARIOUS STATE ROUTES, including but not limited to - 0001, 0013, 0076, and 0095 - SECTION LS1, in PHILADELPHIA COUNTY in the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA as indicated on the BMS Location Maps. DBE 6%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 3-14-16, Required Completion 9-1-17. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ SUPPLEMENTAL ECMS ADVANCED INFORMATION – JANUARY 28, 2016 (ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED TO APPEAR IN THE PROPOSAL) Updated January 7, 2016 LANCASTER COUNTY – SR 0000(MUL) #95716 PROPOSAL:$26.38 PLANS:$25.30 12X18:$31.05 24X36:$448.50 X-SEC:$7.92 12X18:$9.72 24X36:$140.40 This project consist of milling and overlaying Mulberry Street from Vine Street to James Street with ADA upgrades, incorporating green infrastructure elements such as curb bump outs with rain gardens, underground infiltration areas and porous pavers, as well as a bike lane. Mulberry Street will be converted from one-way northbound to two-way operation from King Street to James Street and includes traffic signal and pavement marking modifications to accommodate two way travel, all as indicated on the approved drawings included in the Bid Package for MULBERRY STREET, in LANCASTER COUNTY, CITY OF LANCASTER, from Vine Street to James Street, from Sta. 21+29.57 to Sta. 58+66.91, for an overall project length of 3660.58 linear feet (0.693 mile). DBE 5%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 3-14-16, Required Completion 10-21-16. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ SUPPLEMENTAL ECMS ADVANCED INFORMATION – JANUARY 28, 2016 (ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED TO APPEAR IN THE PROPOSAL) Updated January 5, 2016 MONROE COUNTY – SR 1010(01B) #11737 PROPOSAL:$20.76 PLANS:$12.10 12X18:$14.85 24X36:$214.50 X-SEC:$1.76 12X18:$2.16 24X36:$31.20 EXSTRUCT:$0.66 12X18:$0.81 24X36:$11.70 The description and location of the project is as follows: The proposed project is the replacement of the Snow Hill Road Bridge carrying SR 1010 over Stony Creek in Price Township, Monroe County. The project includes the demolition and removal of the existing single span non composite rolled steel I-beam bridge, and construction of a single span composite prestressed concrete spead box beam bridge. Also included is full depth paving, guiderail installation, new pavement markings and signing, and other miscellaneous construction, as indicated on the approved drawings included in the bid package for STATE ROUTE 1010, SECTION 01B in MONROE COUNTY, PRICE TOWNSHIP from approximately 0 feet north of Spring Run Lane at segment 0030 offset 3214 to approximately 300 feet south of Stoney Run Road at segment 0040 offset 0273. DBE 5%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 2-29-16, Required Completion 10-8-16. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ PHILADELPHIA COUNTY – SR 611(AA2) #105285 PROPOSAL:$15.84 The description and location of the project is as follows: The milling and resurfacing with bituminous material and general maintenance of SR 0611 from JFK Blvd. to Spring Garden Street and SR 3022 around City Hall in Philadelphia County, Engineering District 6-0, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Anticipated Notice to Proceed 3-14-16, Required Completion 5-26-16. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 SUPPLEMENTAL ECMS ADVANCED INFORMATION – JANUARY 28, 2016 (ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED TO APPEAR IN THE PROPOSAL) Updated December 30, 2015 CHESTER COUNTY – SR 0000(WGS) #72912 PROPOSAL:$78.36 PLANS:$9.68 12X18:$11.88 24X36:$171.60 The description and location of the project is as follows: The replacement and upgrade of pedestrian sidewalk, ramps and push buttons at the signalized intersection, installation of signing and pavement markings for pedestrian crossings, on-street parking and lane configuration and other miscellaneous construction, all as indicated on the drawings approved for STATE ROUTE 3026/0841, SECTION WGS, in Chester COUNTY West Grove BOROUGH from approximately 600' East of Guernsey Ave at segment 3026/0280 offset 1187 to approximately Quaker Alley at segment 0841/0181 offset 0903 to approximately Walnut St at segment 0841/0160 offset 2811. DBE 10%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 4-25-16, Required Completion 10-15-16. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ MCKEAN COUNTY – SR 6(ST5) #104649 PROPOSAL:$24.48 PLANS:$5.72 12X18:$7.02 24X36:$101.40 The description and location of the project is as follows: For the improvement of certain sections of STATE HIGHWAYS in MCKEAN and POTTER COUNTIES, VARIOUS TOWNSHIPS and BOROUGHS, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Group 2-16-ST5. For the improvement to 12 State Routes having a combined construction length of approximately 331144 linear feet (62.7 miles); involving various combinations of milling, scratch and resurfacing, using various Superpave Asphalt Mixture Designs for binder and wearing courses, curbing, sidewalks, detectable warning surfaces, guide rail, various pavement markings and legends, and miscellaneous construction as indicated on the approved drawings. Anticipated Notice to Proceed 3-14-16, Required Completion 9-27-16. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAYETTE COUNTY – SR 166(04R) #98423 PROPOSAL:$16.80 PLANS:$10.12 12X18:$12.42 24X36:$179.40 The description and location of the project is as follows: This project consists of milling, resurfacing, adding 4' shoulders and updating the guide rail, signing and pavement markings, minor drainage upgrades, washout repairs, adding type 6-SP shoulders, and other miscellaneous construction as indicated on the approved drawings included in the bid package for STATE ROUTE 0166, SECTION 04R, in FAYETTE COUNTY, Springhill Township and Nicholson Township, beginning at the S.R. 0119/S.R. 0166 intersection (segment 0010 offset 0000) and ending approximately 200' south of Tom Cat Hollow Road (S.R. 3003) (segment 0092 offset 1738). DBE 4%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 3-14-16, Required Completion 7-20-16. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ WESTMORELAND COUNTY – SR 366(21R) #101813 PROPOSAL:$16.68 PLANS:$11.66 12X18:$14.31 24X36:$206.70 The description and location of the project is as follows: This project consists of milling, resurfacing, and updating the guide rail, signing and pavement markings, minor drainage upgrades, washout repairs, and other miscellaneous construction as indicated on the approved drawings included in the bid package for STATE ROUTE 0366, SECTION 21R, in WESTMORELAND COUNTY, Upper Burrell Township, City of Lower Burrell, City of New Kensington, Plum Borough, Murrysville Borough, beginning at approximately 1,725 feet west of Old Greensburg Road (SR 4109) and ending at approximately 1,160 feet east of Logan's Ferry Road (SR 4085).(segment 0172 offset 2718 to segment 0062 offset 0216). DBE 2%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 4-4-16, Required Completion 8-5-16. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ HUNTINGDON COUNTY – SR 994(10B) #23066 2 PROPOSAL:$38.40 PLANS:$53.24 12X18:$65.34 24X36:$943.80 The description and location of the project is as follows: This project is for the replacement of two existing structures in Huntingdon County that carries SR 0994 over Aughwick Creek and over Three Springs Creek. The existing Reinforced Concrete T-Beam over Aughwick Creek will be replaced with a 2-Span Composite P/S Concrete Bulb-Tee Beam Bridge. The existing Single Span Concrete Encased Steel I-Beam Bridge over Three Springs Creek will be replaced with a 1-Span Composite P/S Concrete Spread Box Beam Bridge. The proposed work is for the replacement of the two bridges including roadway approach work and other miscellaneous construction, as indicated on the approved drawings included in the bid package for STATE ROUTE 0994, SECTION 10B, in HUNTINGDON COUNTY, CROMWELL, CLAY TOWNSHIPS, THREE SPRINGS BOROUGH at the following locations: SR 0994, Section 105B STATION 190+50.00 TO STATION 206+20.00 SEGMENT 0540, OFFSET 3062 TO SEGMENT 0550, OFFSET 0828 SR 0994, Section 11B STATION 18+85.00 TO STATION 28+00.00 SEGMENT 0490, OFFSET 1871 TO SEGMENT 0500, OFFSET 0503. DBE 6%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 3-14-16, Required Completion Completion 11-3-17. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ BEAVER COUNTY – SR 7206(LOC) #92314 PROPOSAL:$31.44 PLANS:$7.26 12X18:$8.91 24X36:$128.70 X-SEC:$1.32 12X18:$1.62 24X36:$23.40 The description and location of the project is as follows: For the bridge replacement, bituminous approach, guide rail, pavement marking, and other miscellaneous construction, all within a length of 320 linear feet (0.061 miles), as indicated on the approved drawings included in the bid package for TOWNSHIP ROUTE T-656, SECTION B61, in BEAVER COUNTY, FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This project being situated as follows: From Station 500+75 to Station 504+75. DBE 4%, Anticipated Notice to Proceed 4-27-16, Required
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Class a Wild Trout Streams
    CLASS A WILD TROUT STREAMS STATEWIDE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS REVIEW STREAM REDESIGNATION EVALUATION Drainage Lists: A, C, D, E, F, H, I, K, L, N, O, P, Q, T WATER QUALITY MONITORING SECTION (MAB) DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS BUREAU OF POINT AND NON-POINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION December 2014 INTRODUCTION The Department of Environmental Protection (Department) is required by regulation, 25 Pa. Code section 93.4b(a)(2)(ii), to consider streams for High Quality (HQ) designation when the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission (PFBC) submits information that a stream is a Class A Wild Trout stream based on wild trout biomass. The PFBC surveys for trout biomass using their established protocols (Weber, Green, Miko) and compares the results to the Class A Wild Trout Stream criteria listed in Table 1. The PFBC applies the Class A classification following public notice, review of comments, and approval by their Commissioners. The PFBC then submits the reports to the Department where staff conducts an independent review of the trout biomass data in the fisheries management reports for each stream. All fisheries management reports that support PFBCs final determinations included in this package were reviewed and the streams were found to qualify as HQ streams under 93.4b(a)(2)(ii). There are 50 entries representing 207 stream miles included in the recommendations table. The Department generally followed the PFBC requested stream reach delineations. Adjustments to reaches were made in some instances based on land use, confluence of tributaries, or considerations based on electronic mapping limitations. PUBLIC RESPONSE AND PARTICIPATION SUMMARY The procedure by which the PFBC designates stream segments as Class A requires a public notice process where proposed Class A sections are published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin first as proposed and secondly as final, after a review of comments received during the public comment period and approval by the PFBC Commissioners.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTORATION PLAN Conewago Creek
    Conewago Creek Dauphin, Lancaster and Lebanon Counties Pennsylvania May 2006 Tri-County Conewago Creek Association P.O. Box 107 Elizabethtown, PA 17022 [email protected] UTH www.conewagocreek.netU RESTORATION PLAN Prepared by: RETTEW Associates, Inc. 3020 Columbia Ave. Lancaster, PA 17603 3 ____________________________________________________ ConewagoU Creek Restoration Plan May 2006 ____________________________________________________ This plan was developed for use by the Tri-County Conewago Creek Association. “A nonprofit volunteer organization committed to monitoring, preserving, enhancing and promoting the Conewago Creek Watershed through education, community involvement and watershed improvement projects.” This plan was developed with technical and financial support of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the United States Environmental Protection Agency through the section 319 program under the federal Clean Water Act. This plan was prepared by RETTEW Associates, Inc. 4 TABLEU OF CONTENTS PageU I. Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 II. Background ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 III. Data Collection ---------------------------------------------------------------- 10 IV. Modeling ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 V. Results ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 VI. Restoration Recommendations ----------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Conewago Creek Watershed York and Adams Counties
    01/09/01 INCOMPLETE DRAFT DEP Bureau of Watershed Management DO NOT COPY FOR PUBLIC Watershed Restoration Action Strategy (WRAS) State Water Plan Subbasin 07F (West) Conewago Creek Watershed York and Adams Counties Introduction The 510 square mile Subbasin 07F consists of the West Conewago Creek watershed in York and Adams Counties, which enters the west side of the Susquehanna River at York Haven. Major tributaries include Bermudian Creek, South Branch Conewago Creek, Little Conewago Creek, and Opossum Creek. A total of 903 streams flow for 1104 miles through the subbasin. The subbasin is included in HUC Area 2050306, Lower Susquehanna River a Category I, FY99/2000 Priority watershed in the Unified Watershed Assessment. Geology/Soils The geology of the subbasin is complex. The majority of the watershed is in the Northern Piedmont Ecoregion. The Triassic Lowlands (64a) consisting of sandstone, red shale, and siltstone of the Gettysburg and New Oxford Formations are interspersed throughout the watershed with the Diabase and Conglomerate Uplands (64b) consisting of Triassic/Jurassic diabase and argillite. 64a is an area of low rolling terrain with broad valleys and isolated hills. The soils derived from these rocks are generally less fertile than those derived from Piedmont limestone rocks but are more fertile than those derived from Piedmont igneous and metamorphic rocks. The sandstone and shale of the Gettysburg and New Oxford Formations are poorly cemented and have good porosity and permeability. These soils generally have moderate to high infiltration rates and yield a good supply of groundwater. The red Triassic sandstone is quarried for use as brick and stone building blocks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Votes Loyalsock As PA River of the Year Perkiomen TU Leads
    Winter 2018 Publication of the Pa. Council of Trout Unlimited www.patrout.org Perkiomen TU Students to leads restoration research brookies project on on Route 6 trek By Charlie Charlesworth namesake creek PATU President By Thomas W. Smith Perkiomen Valley TU President In summer 2018, six college students from our PATU 5 Rivers clubs will spend a The Perkiomen Valley Chapter of month trekking across Pennsylvania’s U.S. Trout Unlimited partnered with Sundance Route 6. Their purpose will be to explore, Creek Consulting, the Montgomery do research, collect data and still have time County Conservation District, Penn State do a little bit of fishing in the northern tier’s Master Watershed Stewards and Upper famed brook trout breeding grounds. Perkiomen High School for a stream They will be supported by the PA Fish restoration project on Perkiomen Creek, and Boat Commission, three colleges in- Contributed Photo which was carried out over five days in Volunteers work on a stream restora- cluding Mansfield, Keystone and hopefully See CREEK, page 7 tion project along Perkiomen Creek. See TREK, page 2 Public votes Loyalsock as PA River of the Year By Pennsylvania DCNR Home to legions of paddlers, anglers, and other outdoors enthusiasts in north central Pennsylvania, Loyalsock Creek has been voted the 2018 Pennsylvania River of the Year. The public was invited to vote online, choosing from among five waterways nominated across the state. Results were pariveroftheyear.org Photo See RIVER, page 2 Loyalsock Creek was voted 2018 Pennsylvania River of the Year. IN THIS ISSUE Keystone Coldwater Conference ..........................3 How to become a stream advocate.......................6 Headwaters .............................................................4 Minutes ....................................................................8 Treasurer’s Notes ...................................................5 Chapter Reports ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018
    Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018 Prepared by Douglas L. Moyer and Joel D. Blomquist, U.S. Geological Survey, March 2, 2020 The Chesapeake Bay nontidal network (NTN) currently consists of 123 stations throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Stations are located near U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream-flow gages to permit estimates of nutrient and sediment loadings and trends in the amount of loadings delivered downstream. Routine samples are collected monthly, and 8 additional storm-event samples are also collected to obtain a total of 20 samples per year, representing a range of discharge and loading conditions (Chesapeake Bay Program, 2020). The Chesapeake Bay partnership uses results from this monitoring network to focus restoration strategies and track progress in restoring the Chesapeake Bay. Methods Changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended-sediment loads in rivers across the Chesapeake Bay watershed have been calculated using monitoring data from 123 NTN stations (Moyer and Langland, 2020). Constituent loads are calculated with at least 5 years of monitoring data, and trends are reported after at least 10 years of data collection. Additional information for each monitoring station is available through the USGS website “Water-Quality Loads and Trends at Nontidal Monitoring Stations in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed” (https://cbrim.er.usgs.gov/). This website provides State, Federal, and local partners as well as the general public ready access to a wide range of data for nutrient and sediment conditions across the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In this summary, results are reported for the 10-year period from 2009 through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Conewago Creek Watershed Implementation Plan Update
    Conewago Creek Watershed Implementation Plan Update Plan Sponsors: Tri-County Conewago Creek Association Report Prepared by: January 2021 Contents Figures ......................................................................................................................................................... ii Tables .......................................................................................................................................................... iii Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... v Units of Measure ......................................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction and Project Background ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Previous Watershed Planning in the Conewago Creek Watershed ............................................. 1 1.2 Clean Water Act Section 319 Eligibility ......................................................................................... 3 2. Watershed Description .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Land use ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Soils ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................... 2 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WATERSHED .................................................................................. 3 3.1 Relationship Between Recharge and Geologic Setting .......................................... 3 4.0 APPLICATION OF USGS HYDROGEOLOGIC MODEL .............................................. 5 4.1 Discussion of Hydrogeologic Units ....................................................................... 5 4.2 Calculation of Recharge ......................................................................................... 8 5.0 COMPARISON OF CALCULATED BASE FLOW WITH STREAM FLOW DATA ... 9 5.1 Comparison with Longer-Term Stream Gage Records .......................................... 9 5.2 Comparison with More Recent Stream Gage Records ........................................ 10 5.3 Comparison with StreamStats .............................................................................. 11 6.0 IMPERVIOUS COVER ................................................................................................... 12 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 15 7.1 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................... 15 7.2 Recommendations ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster County Incremental Deliveredhammer a Creekgricultural Lititz Run Lancasterload of Nitro Gcountyen Per HUC12 Middle Creek
    PENNSYLVANIA Lancaster County Incremental DeliveredHammer A Creekgricultural Lititz Run LancasterLoad of Nitro gCountyen per HUC12 Middle Creek Priority Watersheds Cocalico Creek/Conestoga River Little Cocalico Creek/Cocalico Creek Millers Run/Little Conestoga Creek Little Muddy Creek Upper Chickies Creek Lower Chickies Creek Muddy Creek Little Chickies Creek Upper Conestoga River Conoy Creek Middle Conestoga River Donegal Creek Headwaters Pequea Creek Hartman Run/Susquehanna River City of Lancaster Muddy Run/Mill Creek Cabin Creek/Susquehanna River Eshlemen Run/Pequea Creek West Branch Little Conestoga Creek/ Little Conestoga Creek Pine Creek Locally Generated Green Branch/Susquehanna River Valley Creek/ East Branch Ag Nitrogen Pollution Octoraro Creek Lower Conestoga River (pounds/acre/year) Climbers Run/Pequea Creek Muddy Run/ 35.00–45.00 East Branch 25.00–34.99 Fishing Creek/Susquehanna River Octoraro Creek Legend 10.00–24.99 West Branch Big Beaver Creek Octoraro Creek 5.00–9.99 Incremental Delivered Load NMap (l Createdbs/a byc rThee /Chesapeakeyr) Bay Foundation Data from USGS SPARROW Model (2011) Conowingo Creek 0.00–4.99 0.00 - 4.99 cida.usgs.gov/sparrow Tweed Creek/Octoraro Creek 5.00 - 9.99 10.00 - 24.99 25.00 - 34.99 35.00 - 45.00 Map Created by The Chesapeake Bay Foundation Data from USGS SPARROW Model (2011) http://cida.usgs.gov/sparrow PENNSYLVANIA York County Incremental Delivered Agricultural YorkLoad Countyof Nitrogen per HUC12 Priority Watersheds Hartman Run/Susquehanna River York City Cabin Creek Green Branch/Susquehanna
    [Show full text]