ZIRCON and APATITE (U-Th)/He DATES and INTERPRETATION of HIGH-DAMAGE ZIRCON from the SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS, FRONT RANGE, COLORADO By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ZIRCON and APATITE (U-Th)/He DATES and INTERPRETATION of HIGH-DAMAGE ZIRCON from the SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS, FRONT RANGE, COLORADO By “INVERTED” ZIRCON AND APATITE (U-Th)/He DATES AND INTERPRETATION OF HIGH-DAMAGE ZIRCON FROM THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS, FRONT RANGE, COLORADO by JOSHUA E. JOHNSON B.A., Middlebury College, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science Department of Geosciences 2015 This thesis entitled: “Inverted” zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He dates and interpretation of high-damage zircon from the Southern Rocky Mountains, Front Range, Colorado written by Joshua E. Johnson has been approved for the Department of Geosciences (Dr. Rebecca Flowers) (Dr. Kevin Mahan) (Dr. Craig Jones) Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Johnson, Joshua E. (MSc., Geosciences) “Inverted” zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He dates and interpretation of high-damage zircon from the Southern Rocky Mountains, Front Range, Colorado Thesis directed by Associate Professor Rebecca Flowers Radiation damage in zircon has a profound influence on helium retentivity. This study is aimed at understanding the He systematics of high-damage zircons since this end of the damage spectrum has received the least attention in prior work. We acquired 121 zircon (U-Th)/He (ZHe) dates from 29 samples from an ~50 km east-west transect across the Colorado Front Range that span the full range of alpha dosages (radiation damage) encompassed by previous diffusion experiments. Date-eU patterns within our ZHe dataset are broadly consistent with the expected influence of radiation damage, showing positive and then negative correlations. ZHe dates from the range core in Rocky Mountain N.P. record cooling to near-surface temperatures during the Laramide Orogeny (65-45 Ma). Closer to the range front, there is a sharp transition to Oligo-Miocene ZHe dates despite the presence of Laramide apatite He (AHe) dates in the immediate vicinity. Titanite He (THe) dates from the area record cooling through ~200 °C in the Neoproterozoic, precluding reheating above that temperature in the last 600 myr. High-damage zircons (>1018 α/g) from Big Thompson Canyon have ~20 Ma ZHe dates that are “inverted” with respect to 65-45 Ma AFT and AHe dates from the same area. This inversion implies that these zircons are sensitive to temperatures of <70 °C, significantly lower than their nominal closure temperature of ~180 °C. At these high damage levels, there is a disconnect between the retentivity predicted by the current damage-diffusivity model, model ZHe dates, and relevant geologic and geochronologic constraints. Despite this disconnect, our results show that damaged zircons can serve as low-temperature chronometers. The utility of applying ZHe in this manner is demonstrated by the detection of a previously unrecognized reheating event on the order of ~50 °C in the Oligo-Miocene, implied by the ~20 Ma ZHe dates. Our preferred explanation for this event invokes the reburial of the range front under ~1 km of sediment derived from erosion of the high topography of the range core followed by the subsequent unroofing in the early Miocene, possibly recorded by the basal units of the Ogallala Formation on the High Plains. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have many people to thank for helping me throughout the thesis process. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Becky Flowers for her unwavering support and incredibly helpful feedback. Jim Metcalf provided incalculable analytical assistance – this project could not have happened without his help. David Liefert, a CU undergraduate, provided excellent field assistance and helped tremendously with the lab work that followed. Dr. Graham Baird (University of Northern Colorado) and Dr. Shari Kelley (New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology) graciously provided mineral separates that were used in this study. Kevin Mahan (CU) provided valuable information on the geology of Big Thompson Canyon. Paul McLaughlin and others at Rocky Mountain National Park assisted with the permitting process required to conduct research in the park. Nigel Kelley (CU) and Eric Ellison (CU) assisted with the collection and interpretation of Raman data. Ken Cochran (University of Northern Colorado) assisted with the collection of CL images. Lastly, thanks to all my fellow grad students and friends that let me bounce ideas off them these past two years. This project would not have been possible without generous funding from the Rocky Mountain Conservancy, the Geological Society of America, the Colorado Scientific Society, and the Dept. of Geosciences at CU. iv CONTENTS CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................1 II. GEOLOGIC SETTING ............................................................................4 2.1 Regional Geologic Setting ............................................................4 2.2 Big Thompson Canyon .................................................................9 2.3 Rocky Mountain National Park ..................................................12 III. PREVIOUS THERMOCHRONOLOGY IN THE COLORADO ROCKIES ...............................................................................................13 IV. SAMPLES AND METHODS ................................................................15 4.1 Samples .......................................................................................15 4.2 Cathodoluminescence Imaging and Raman Spectroscopy .............................................................................15 4.3 (U-Th)/He Thermochronology ....................................................18 V. RESULTS ...............................................................................................21 5.1 Zircon Characterization: CL Imaging and Raman Spectroscopy .............................................................................21 5.2 (U-Th)/He Thermochronology ....................................................24 VI. DISCUSSION .........................................................................................32 6.1 (U-Th)/He Systematics of High-Damage Zircons ......................32 6.1.1 Alpha dose of analyzed zircons .........................................32 6.1.2 Reproducibility and temperature sensitivity of He data from high-damage zircons ..............................36 6.1.3 Testing the high-damage end of the damage-diffusivity model .................................................38 6.2 Geologic Implications .................................................................41 VII. CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................49 REFERENCES….……………………..…………………………………………51 v TABLES Table 1. (U-Th)/He data ..............................................................................................25 vi FIGURES Figure 1. Simplified geologic map of the northern Front Range ...................................5 2. Map of sample locations and plots of ZHe data ...........................................16 3. CL and Raman data .......................................................................................22 4. Age-elevation plot for Longs Peak ...............................................................29 5. Plots of AHe and THe data ...........................................................................30 6. Simplified date-eU plot of all ZHe data ........................................................31 7. Alpha dose comparison plot ..........................................................................34 8. HeFTy simulation results ..............................................................................40 SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES Figure 1. Results by individual sample and lithology ..................................................50 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Zircon’s impressive durability, longevity, ubiquity, and ability to incorporate uranium and other trace elements into its structure have enabled a wide array of geochronologic, trace element, and isotopic investigations with extensive insights into the geologic record. Zircon is now increasingly applied as a (U-Th)/He thermochronometer (ZHe), with initial diffusion work suggesting a nominal closure temperature of ~180 °C (Reiners et al., 2002; Reiners, 2005). It is well known that zircon’s typically high U-Th concentrations can cause significant radiation damage accumulation within its crystal structure (e.g., Meldrum et al., 1998). Recent work has shown that zircon He diffusion is strongly dependent on its accrued radiation damage (Guenthner et al., 2013). Recent publication of a zircon radiation damage-He diffusion kinetic model unlocks the potential to understand and exploit the ZHe data dispersion that is a consequence of this effect. The effect of radiation damage on He diffusion kinetics was first recognized in apatite, where damage accumulation decreases the He diffusivity (Shuster et al., 2006; Flowers et al., 2009). For some thermal histories, this phenomenon is evident as a positive correlation between date and effective uranium concentration (eU = U + 0.235 × Th). eU serves a proxy for the rate of alpha production, and hence, relative radiation damage in a suite of crystals that have experienced the same thermal history (Flowers et al., 2007). In zircon, progressive damage accumulation initially causes a decrease in He diffusivity that is interpreted
Recommended publications
  • Denudation History and Internal Structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, Based on Apatite-Fission-Track Thermoc
    NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 41 Denudation history and internal structure of the Front Range and Wet Mountains, Colorado, based on apatite­fission­track thermochronology 1 2 1Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Shari A. Kelley and Charles E. Chapin 2New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract An apatite fission­track (AFT) partial annealing zone (PAZ) that developed during Late Cretaceous time provides a structural datum for addressing questions concerning the timing and magnitude of denudation, as well as the structural style of Laramide deformation, in the Front Range and Wet Mountains of Colorado. AFT cooling ages are also used to estimate the magnitude and sense of dis­ placement across faults and to differentiate between exhumation and fault­generated topography. AFT ages at low elevationX along the eastern margin of the southern Front Range between Golden and Colorado Springs are from 100 to 270 Ma, and the mean track lengths are short (10–12.5 µm). Old AFT ages (> 100 Ma) are also found along the western margin of the Front Range along the Elkhorn thrust fault. In contrast AFT ages of 45–75 Ma and relatively long mean track lengths (12.5–14 µm) are common in the interior of the range. The AFT ages generally decrease across northwest­trending faults toward the center of the range. The base of a fossil PAZ, which separates AFT cooling ages of 45– 70 Ma at low elevations from AFT ages > 100 Ma at higher elevations, is exposed on the south side of Pikes Peak, on Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • To See the Hike Archive
    Geographical Area Destination Trailhead Difficulty Distance El. Gain Dest'n Elev. Comments Allenspark 932 Trail Near Allenspark A 4 800 8580 Allenspark Miller Rock Riverside Dr/Hwy 7 TH A 6 700 8656 Allenspark Taylor and Big John Taylor Rd B 7 2300 9100 Peaks Allenspark House Rock Cabin Creek Rd A 6.6 1550 9613 Allenspark Meadow Mtn St Vrain Mtn TH C 7.4 3142 11632 Allenspark St Vrain Mtn St Vrain Mtn TH C 9.6 3672 12162 Big Thompson Canyon Sullivan Gulch Trail W of Waltonia Rd on Hwy A 2 941 8950 34 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Stone Mountain Round Mtn. TH B 8 2100 7900 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Mt Olympus Hwy 34 B 1.4 1438 8808 Big Thompson Canyon 34 Round (Sheep) Round Mtn. TH B 9 3106 8400 Mountain Big Thompson Canyon Hwy 34 Foothills Nature Trail Round Mtn TH EZ 2 413 6240 to CCC Shelter Bobcat Ridge Mahoney Park/Ginny Bobcat Ridge TH B 10 1500 7083 and DR trails Bobcat Ridge Bobcat Ridge High Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 2000 7000 Point Bobcat Ridge Ginny Trail to Valley Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 1604 7087 Loop Bobcat Ridge Ginny Trail via Bobcat Ridge TH B 9 1528 7090 Powerline Tr Boulder Chautauqua Park Royal Arch Chautauqua Trailhead by B 3.4 1358 7033 Rgr. Stn. Boulder County Open Space Mesa Trail NCAR Parking Area B 7 1600 6465 Boulder County Open Space Gregory Canyon Loop Gregory Canyon Rd TH B 3.4 1368 7327 Trail Boulder Open Space Heart Lake CR 149 to East Portal TH B 9 2000 9491 Boulder Open Space South Boulder Peak Boulder S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Table 1, Camp Area Summary
    Backcountry/Wilderness Management Plan and Environmental Assessment Appendix C Appendix C Table 1, Camp Area Summary Designated Areas/Sites Individual Camp Areas Campsites People East Side 60 109 763 West Side 59 88 616 Total 119 197 1379 Group Camp Areas Campsites People East Side 10 10 120 West Side 11 11 132 Total 21 21 252 Accessible Camp Areas Campsites People East Side 1 1 12 West Side 0 0 0 Total 1 1 12 Wood Fire Camp Areas Campsites East Side 8 13 West Side 9 13 Total 17 26 Stock Areas/Sites Individual Camp Areas Campsites People Stock East Side 3 3 18 24 West Side 3 3 18 24 Total 6 6 36 48 Group Camp Areas Campsites People Stock East Side 2 2 24 32 West Side 2 2 24 32 Total 4 4 48 64 Llama only Camp Areas Campsites People Stock East Side 2 2 14 10 West Side1175 Total 3 3 21 15 Wood Fire Camp Areas Campsites East Side 8 13 West Side 9 13 Total 17 26 Rocky Mountain National Park C-1 Backcountry/Wilderness Management Plan and Environmental Assessment Appendix C Crosscountry Areas Areas Parties People East Side 9 16 112 West Side 14 32 224 Total 23 48 336 Summer Totals for Designated, Stock and Crosscountry Areas Camp Areas Campsites/Parties People East Side 80 136 1004 West Side 84 131 969 Total 164 267 1973 Bivouac Areas Areas People East Side 11 88 West Side 0 0 Total 11 88 Winter Areas Areas Parties People East Side 32 136 1632 West Side 23 71 852 Total 55 207 2484 Rocky Mountain National Park C-2 Backcountry/Wilderness Management Plan and Environmental Assessment Appendix C Appendix C Table 2, Designated Camp Area/Sites Number
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park News U.S
    National Park Service Rocky Mountain National Park News U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper of Rocky Mountain National Park Summer - 2013 July 19 - September 2 2nd Edition Bear Lake Road Reconstruction continues. Expect up to two, 20 minute delays in each direction between Moraine NPS/Ann Schonlau Park Visitor Center and the Park & Ride. Welcome to Your Park! Visitor Centers Rocky Mountain National Park is a special place in the hearts of many people. These mountains are home to flowers, forests and wildlife. For East of the Divide – Estes Park Area generations, this place has nourished the human spirit and connected us to the natural world. We invite you to explore your park, make your own Alpine Visitor Center memories, and discover what Rocky means to you. Enjoy it, protect it Open daily 9 a.m.-5 p.m. (weather permitting) Features extraordinary views of alpine tundra, displays, information, and be safe out there. bookstore, adjacent gift shop, cafe, and coffee bar. Call (970) 586-1222 for The Staff of Rocky Mountain National Park Trail Ridge Road conditions. Beaver Meadows Visitor Center Looking for Fun? Open daily 8 a.m.- 6 p.m. Features spectacular free park movie, Rocky Mountain National Park has something for everyone! Make information, bookstore, large park orientation your trip memorable with these tips: map, and backcountry permits in an adjacent building. Be inspired – How many times can you say, “Wow!” Find out by driving Fall River Visitor Center Alpine Visitor Center up Trail Ridge Road for spectacular views. Open daily 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (Elevation 8,640 Ft)
    1 NCSS Conference 2001 Field Tour -- Colorado Rocky Mountains Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:00 AM Depart Ft. Collins Marriott 8:30 Arrive Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (elevation 8,640 ft) 8:45 "Soil Survey of Rocky Mountain National Park" - Lee Neve, Soil Survey Project Leader, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:00 "Correlation and Classification of the Soils" - Thomas Hahn, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MLRA Office 6, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:15-9:30 "Interpretive Story of the Lawn Lake Flood" - Rocky Mountain National Park Interpretive Staff, National Park Service 10:00 Depart 10:45 Arrive Alpine Visitors Center (elevation 11,796 ft) 11:00 "Research Needs in the National Parks" - Pete Biggam, Soil Scientist, National Park Service 11:05 "Pedology and Biogeochemistry Research in Rocky Mountain National Park" - Dr. Eugene Kelly, Colorado State University 11:25 - 11:40 "Soil Features and Geologic Processes in the Alpine Tundra"- Mike Petersen and Tim Wheeler, Soil Scientists, Natural Resources Conservation Service Box Lunch 12:30 PM Depart 1:00 Arrive Many Parks Curve Interpretive Area (elevation 9,620 ft.) View of Valleys and Glacial Moraines, Photo Opportunity 1:30 Depart 3:00 Arrive Bobcat Gulch Fire Area, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 3:10 "Fire History and Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Efforts" - Carl Chambers, U. S. Forest Service 3:40 "Involvement and Interaction With the Private Sector"- Todd Boldt; District Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 4:10 "Current Research on the Fire" - Colorado State University 4:45 Depart 6:00 Arrive Ft. Collins Marriott 2 3 Navigator’s Narrative Tim Wheeler Between the Fall River Visitors Center and the Lawn Lake Alluvial Debris Fan: This Park, or open grassy area, is called Horseshoe Park and is the tail end of the Park’s largest valley glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Trail System
    Rocky Mountain National Park Trail Map HOURGLASS RESERVIOR Rocky M4ountain National Park Trail System 1 TRAP LAKE Y TWIN LAKE RESERVIOR W PETERSON LAKE H JOE WRIGHT RESERVIOR O L O C ZIMMERMAN LAKE MIRROR LAKE R E P P U , S S A P Y M Corral Creek USFS Trail Head M (! U M LAKE HUSTED 4 HWY 1 LOST LAKE COLO PPER LAKE LOUISE LOST LAKE, U #*Lost Falls Rowe Mountain LAKE DUNRAVEN LOST LAKE 13184 , LOWER Dunraven USFS Trail Head LONG DRAW RESERVIOR D (! Rowe Peak 13404 Hagues PeaDk 13560 D MICHIGAN LAKES TH LAKE AGNES E S SNOW LAKE La Poudre Pass Trail Head AD Mummy Mountain (! DL E 13425 D Fairchild Mountain 13502 D CRYSTAL LAKE LAWN LAKE TH UN Ypsilon Mountain DE R 13514 PA B SS D L A C R K PE C P SPECTACLE LAKES A , U N ER Chiquita, Mount Y IV D O R ST 13069 N E WE , DR IL U U A Y P O 4 TR P P P 3 TE Chapin Pass Trail Head S E Bridal Veil Falls LAKE OF THE CLOUDS Y U (! IL W O R #* H S N ER Cow Creek Trail Head U L K, LOW (! R A REE K OW C E C E V C(!rater Trail Head I (! U R POUDRE LAKE Cache La Poudre Trail Head S H O (! W D Milner Pass Trail Head Chasm Falls Y A #* R 3 Horseshoe Falls 4 Rock Cut Trail Head O ! #* L ( Thousand Falls O #* C Lawn Lake Trail Head FAN LAKE (! Colorado River Trail Head SHEEP LAKES (! Timber Lake Trail Head (! Beaver Ponds Trail Head (! CASCADE LAKE HIDDEN VALLEY BEAVER PONDS Lumpy Ridge Trail Head Ute Crossing Trail Head (! (! FOREST LAKE Deer Mountain/ Deer Ridge Trail Head ARROWHEAD LAKE ROCK LAKE (! U TE T TOWN OF RA LAKE ESTES IL Never Summer Trail Head INKWELL LAKE EA ESTES PARK (! ST U Upper Beaver Meadows
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Geology of Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado
    A Guide to the Geology of ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK COLORADO For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 15 cents A Guide to the Geology of ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK [ COLORADO ] By Carroll H. Wegemann Former Regional Geologist, National Park Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAROLD L. ICKES, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE . NEWTON B. DRURY, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1944 Table of Contents PAGE INTRODUCTION in BASIC FACTS ON GEOLOGY 1 THE OLDEST ROCKS OF THE PARK 2 THE FIRST MOUNTAINS 3 The Destruction of the First Mountains 3 NATURE OF PALEOZOIC DEPOSITS INDICATES PRESENCE OF SECOND MOUNTAINS 4 THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS 4 Time and Form of the Mountain Folding 5 Erosion Followed by Regional Uplift 5 Evidences of Intermittent Uplift 8 THE GREAT ICE AGE 10 Continental Glaciers 11 Valley Glaciers 11 POINTS OF INTEREST ALONG PARK ROADS 15 ROAD LOGS 18 Thompson River Entrance to Deer Ridge Junction 18 Deer Ridge Junction to Fall River Pass via Fall River .... 20 Fall River Pass to Poudre Lakes 23 Trail Ridge Road between Fall River Pass and Deer Ridge Junction 24 Deer Ridge Junction to Fall River Entrance via Horseshoe Park 29 Bear Lake Road 29 ILLUSTRATIONS LONGS PEAK FROM BEAR LAKE Front and back covers CHASM FALLS Inside back cover FIGURE PAGE 1. GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE iv 2. LONGS PEAK FROM THE EAST 3 3. PROFILE SECTION ACROSS THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS 5 4. ANCIENT EROSIONAL PLAIN ON TRAIL RIDGE 6 5. ANCIENT EROSIONAL PLAIN FROM FLATTOP MOUNTAIN ... 7 6. VIEW NORTHWEST FROM LONGS PEAK 8 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • TRATL RIDGE ROAD Rocky' Mountain National Park Between
    TRATL RIDGE ROAD HAER No. CO-31 Rocky' Mountain National Park Between Estes Park and Grand Lake Estes Park vicinity Larimer County COLO Colorado 7- y PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior P.O. Box 37127 Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD TRAIL RIDGE ROAD Rocky Mountain National Park 7- HAER NO. CO-31 Location: Traversing Rocky Mountain National Park from Estes Park to Grand Lake, Colorado. Quadrangle and UTM: East end: Fall River Entrance Estes Park quad 13/448191/4470700 West end: Grand Lake Entrance Grand Lake quad 13/428765/4456351 Construction Date 1926-1949 Present Owner: Rocky Mountain National Park, National Park Service Present Use: Park scenic highway Significance: Trail Ridge Road has national, state, and local significance as an engineering feat-- the highest continuous highway in the United States—and for its role in the development of the Rocky Mountain National Park road system. Project Information: Documentation of Trail Ridge Road is part of the National Park Service Roads and Bridges Recording Project, conducted during the summer of 1993 under the co-sponsorship of HABS/HAER and Rocky Mountain National Park. Richard Quin, HAER Historian, August 1993 TRAIL RIDGE ROAD HAER NO. CO-31 (page 2) II. HISTORY The highest road in the national park system, and the highest continuous paved highway in the United States, the Trail Ridge Road is the principal highway crossing Rocky Mountain National Park between the park border communities of Estes Park and Grand Lake. The road was constructed largely between 1929 and 1932 to replace the Fall River Road; after its completion, the western portion of the old road was abandoned, and the eastern segment became a one-way uphill road.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Dedication and Acknowledgements............................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 5 Alpine Environments...................................................................................................................................................5 Flooding......................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Never Summer Runners' Handbook
    NEVER SUMMER 100K & 60K: JULY 30 – AUG 1 Start: Gould Community Center, Gould, Colorado Distance: 100km (64.0 miles & 14,450′) or 60km (37.6 & 8,850′) Min/Max Elevation: 8,450′ / 11,852′ Average Elevation: 10,220′ Terrain: Trail, dirt road, rough trail, high alpine, rocks Fauna: Moose, elk, deer, black bears, bighorn sheep UTMB Points: 100km – 4 points; 60km – 3 points Registration Caps: 500 total (100km – 350; 60km – 150) Time Allowance: 100km – 24hrs; 60km – 15hrs Date: 60km: Friday July 30, 2021, 5:30am 100km: Saturday July 31, 2021, 5:30am Following recommendations from the State of Colorado and Jackson County Public Health, at this point we do not anticipate any mandatory COVID protocols for runners or crews at our event. The race will continue increased sanitization and encourage those who are unvaccinated to wear masks. (6/18/21) In light of the recent tragedy of 21 deaths at a mountain 100k in China, we will be more strongly enforcing our required gear list, including a gear check as part of packet pickup. This applies to both the 100k and 60k. Required Gear: Jacket (Wind/Waterproof Recommended) Warm Hat / Beanie / Buff Gloves Whistle Reusable Cup Water Capacity of 32oz/1L Recommended Gear: Cell Phone Light + Spare Light/Batteries Extra Top Layer Space Blanket The Never Summer 100km & 60km races will take place almost entirely within the boundaries of State Forest State Park and run between the Never Summer Mountains on the northern border of Rocky Mountain National Park and the Medicine Bow Mountains to the north of Cameron Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Communities That Are Fostered in Respect and Trust
    FALL ISSUE... 2018 The Cheley PACK RAT CHELEY COLORADO CAMPS 1-800-CAMPFUN WWW.CHELEY.COM Building Communities That Are EMAIL: [email protected] Fostered in Respect and Trust BACORATAC – Building a community of respect and trust at Cheley. Imagine if we all focused on building communities that were fostered in respect and trust. Imagine if our young people were presented daily with examples of respectful behavior. Respecting other people’s views, beliefs, backgrounds, and aspirations. Rather than the responses of negativity and disdain for opposing views, we could all improve in our IN THIS ISSUE... responses to differing Building Communities That Are views and demonstrate Fostered in Respect and Trust ........... 1 respect. This would make Camp Dates for 2019 Season ............ 2 a huge impact on our communities. Hopefully Family Camp 2018 ............................. 2 this summer, each of our Cheley/Childrens’ Burn Camp 2018 .. 2 campers and staff were Teen Summit Camp 2018 .................. 3 introduced to different Cheley Mini Camp 2018 .................... 3 cultures, values, and Lower Chipeta 2018 ........................... 4 opinions. By spending time building relationships with people from different cultures, each of Lower Ski Hi 2018 .............................. 5 us have broadened our understanding of the world. Chipeta 2018...................................... 7 This summer Shawn Ness, our Director of Operations, consistently Ski Hi 2018 ......................................... 8 reminded us to consider positive presuppositions when talking or Senior Chipeta 2018 .........................10 working with others. The idea is that we start each conversation or Haiyaha 2018 ................................... 12 thought by giving everyone the benefit of the doubt. For example, Girls’ Trail’s End 2018 ........................14 when someone shows up late, often we think “they are lazy, they don’t Boys’ Trail’s End 2018 .....................
    [Show full text]