DOCSLIB.ORG

The Honorable Charles Richey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Honorable Charles Richey THE HONORABLE CHARLES RICHEY Oral History Project The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit Oral History Project United States Courts The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit District of Columbia Circuit THE HONORABLE CHARLES RICHEY Interviews conducted by: Daniel Singer, Esquire April 10, 13 and 25, 1995, May 9, 1995, October 5, 1995 January 1996, February 19, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface.............................................................................................................................................. i Oral History Agreements Honorable Charles Richey ................................................................................................. iii Daniel Singer, Esquire ....................................................................................................... ix Oral History Transcripts of Interviews First Interview: April 10, 1995 ............................................................................................1 Second Interview: April 13, 1995, .....................................................................................56 Third Interview: April 25, 1995, ......................................................................................123 Fourth Interview: May 9, 1995 ........................................................................................175 Fifth Interview: October 5, 1995, ....................................................................................313 Sixth Interview: January 23, 1996 ...................................................................................387 Seventh Interview: February 19, 1996 .............................................................................436 Index ......................................................................................................................................... A-1 Table of Cases ..............................................................................................................................B-1 Biographical Sketches Honorable Charles Richey ...............................................................................................C-1 Daniel Singer, Esquire .................................................................................................... D-1 NOTE The following pages record interviews conducted on the dates indicated. The interviews were recorded digitally or on cassette tape, and the interviewee and the interviewer have been afforded an opportunity to review and edit the transcript. The contents hereof and all literary rights pertaining hereto are governed by, and are subject to, the Oral History Agreements included herewith. © 2017 Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit. All rights reserved. PREFACE The goal of the Oral History Project of the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit is to preserve the recollections of the judges of the Courts of the District of Columbia Circuit and lawyers, court staff, and others who played important roles in the history of the Circuit. The Project began in 1991. Oral history interviews are conducted by volunteer attorneys who are trained by the Society. Before donating the oral history to the Society, both the subject of the history and the interviewer have had an opportunity to review and edit the transcripts. Indexed transcripts of the oral histories and related documents are available in the Judges’ Library in the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse, 333 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress, and the library of the Historical Society of the District of Columbia With the permission of the person being interviewed, oral histories are also available on the Internet through the Society's Web site, www.dcchs.org. Audio recordings of most interviews, as well as electronic versions of the transcripts, are in the custody of the Society. i Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit Interviewee Oral History Agreement 1. In consideration of the recording and preservation of my oral history memoir by the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, Washington, D.C., and its employees and agents (hereinafter"the Society"), I, Charles R. Richey, except as otherwise provided herein and in Schedule B attached hereto, do hereby grant and convey to the Society and its successors and assigns all of my rights, title, and interest in the tape recordings and transcripts of interviews of me as described in Schedule A hereto, including literary rights and copyrights. All copies of the tapes and transcripts are subject to the same restrictions0 herein provided. 2. The foregoing transfer is subject to the exception specifiedin Schedule B hereto. 3. I reserve the right to use the tapes and transcripts andtheir content as a resource forany book, pamphlet, article or other "vriting of whjch I am anauthor or co-author. 4. I authorize the Society, subject to the exception in Schedule B attached hereto, to duplicate, edit, publish, or permit the use of said tape recordings and transcripts in any manner that the Society considers appropriate, and I waive any claims I may have or acquire to any royalties from such use. 5. It is my intention to donate a copy of the tapes and transcripts described on Schedule A hereto as additional gifts under Paragraph 3 of my Deed of Gift to Case Western Reserve University dated December 1, 1992. (For information, a copy of the Deed of Gift is attached as Schedule C. The terms of that Deed of Gift shall apply exclusively to such tapes and transcripts as I may donate to Case Western Reserve University and shall not othenvise affect this grant and conveyance to the Society.) Accordingly, upon my request, the Society shall deliver to Case Western Reserve Universitv one set of the materials described on Schedule A hereto. Charles R. Richey �V � -���� SWORN TO AND SUBSCRJB .,D before me this/� day of � �9 7'II,; Notary Public My Commission expires __________ � �ooi0 ACCEPTED this _rft..0_ day of U5t:.-� , 1-9� by Daniel M. Gribbon, President of the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit. Daniel M. Gribbon Schedule A Tapes recordings, digital recordings, transcripts, computer diskettes and electronic media resulting from four interviews of Charles Richey, conducted on the following dates: Pages of Interview No. and Date Number of Tapes or CDs Final Transcript No. 1 April 10, 1995 } 1-55 No. 2 April 13, 1995 } 56-122 No. 3, April 25, 1995 } All on one CD 123-174 No. 4, May 9, 1995 } 175-312 No. 5 October 5, 1995 } 313-386 No. 6 January, 1996 } 387-435 No. 7 February 19, 1996 } 436-505 The transcripts of the seven interviews are contained on one CD. Schedule B Exception to Ora! HistorY Agreement The materials described in Schedule A shall at all times be available to the Circuit Executive of the United States Courts for the District of Columbia Circuit, and members of his/her staff working on the Oral History P�ject. Until December 1, 201 7, access to such materials is restricted to me and to others only 'with my v..Tittenpermission or, in the event of my death, to my son, Charles �.Richey, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, and to others only with the writtenpermission of my son, Charles R. Richey, Jr., or his designee. This exception shall be of no effect on and after December 1, 2017. Schedule C PEEP or CIFT znstrume�t of Gift froa tbe 'Koborable Charles R. RicheJ �o tbe·case vesterA Reserve �niversity School of Lav I, Cha=les �. Richey (hereafter: Donor), hereby give, g1:ant, . ' convey on this ls� day of Decembe.r, 1992, title in, �nd se� over to the Case Western Reserve University for inclusion in the collections of all the Library o! the Schoo! ot La� (hereinafter: Library) and for aainis�ration therein, a collection ot all my p�pers, including all books and !�amed a�ards, and �ll records and papers from the tiroe I vas in la� -school ��.roughout my adult life, This includes fil�s pert�ining �o my �o�k �s a j�dge, copies of speeches �nd other writinss in con.,ection vi�h professional a�tivi�y ane servic� on various bo�ds ana coW?Lissions in ci�y, eounty, and state governme�t, and: in la� practice as vall a zederal �udge under Ar�icle III of ��e Constit�tionI of the Onitee States. I hera�y dedicate �o �he public all rights, in�luding copy=igh�s �hrougho�� the vorld, -in this property. The pi!.pers constitu-cing this gift shall be subject to the. eonditions hereina�t•r enl.!ltlerated: l. Aceess. With the exc•ption that the en�ire collection shall at all times be available to the staff of the Library £or administrative p�=poses, and that published and unp�blished opinions, 'books, scrapbooks, and phot.ograph.s and a.wards may be availabie to the public imfflediat�ly, access to the collections for th• next t�enty-five yea�s i� res�rieted �o me and to others only vi�h my �itten pe:-mission, or, in the event o! my d�at.1', to my son, Charles R, Richey, Jr., Esq,1ire or his designee. Thereafter, the collection shall be 111ade ·a.vaila.ble to the· !)Ul::ilie at the discretion of the Library. 2. B�rodµction- Person.$ granted access t0 the collection may procure at their o.-n expense singla-e0py raproductions of the unpublished writings contained in the collection. Sul::,ject to the restrictions in paragraph l, to-:- :ea.sons ot sec:urity, preserva'Cion, or ser,,ice, the Library, vhen cc�si>tent vith its policies, may r�produce, transcribe, transmi�� copy and/or publicly display or e�ibi� all or parts of the cellection . 3. .Agdi
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Blue Slip Process for US Circuit and District
    The Blue Slip Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: Frequently Asked Questions (name redacted) Analyst in American National Government October 2, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44975 The Blue-Slip Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: FAQs Summary The blue slip process used by the Senate Judiciary Committee (the committee) for U.S. circuit and district court nominations has received renewed interest from Senators. The committee’s use of the blue slip has been, since at least 1917, a feature of its consideration of U.S. circuit and district court nominations. After a President selects a nominee for a U.S. circuit or district court judgeship, the chairman sends a blue-colored form to the Senators representing the home state of the nominee. The form seeks the home state Senators’ assessment of the nominee. If a home state Senator has no objection to a nominee, the blue slip is returned to the chairman with a positive response. If, however, a home state Senator objects to a nominee, the blue slip is either withheld or returned with a negative response. Since the use of blue slips is not codified or included in the committee’s rules, the chairman of the committee has the discretion to determine the extent to which a home state Senator’s negative, or withheld, blue slip stops a President’s judicial nomination from receiving a committee hearing and a committee vote and, consequently, whether it reaches the Senate floor. Over the century of the use of the blue slip, different chairmen have used the blue slip in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Collision of Institutional Power and Constitutional Obligations: the Use of Blue Slips in the Judicial Confirmation Process
    The Collision of Institutional Power and Constitutional Obligations: The Use of Blue Slips in the Judicial Confirmation Process Ryan C. Black Michigan State University Ryan J. Owens University of Wisconsin Anthony J. Madonna University of Georgia The authors would like to thank Mitchell Sollenberger for making his data available. Additional thanks to Ryan Bakker, Jamie Carson and Richard Vining for helpful comments. Abstract In recent years, judicial nominations to lower federal courts have been blocked privately by negative blue slips returned by home state senators. We examine the conditions under which senators return these negative blue slips and whether judicial qualifications can mitigate the possible negative effects of ideological distance. We discover two results. First, consistent with existing work, ideology plays a strong role in blue slipping. Second, and more important, we find that nominee qualifications mitigate ideological extremism--but only for district court nominees. That is, while past presidents could nominate well-credentialed ideologues to the circuit courts of appeals and see them confirmed, today’s presidents cannot. In short, if presidents nominate ideologues--even those who are well qualified--to circuit courts, we will continue to observe lengthy vacancies and bitter nomination struggles between the president and Congress over those important courts. 1 Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once stated about government: “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants” (Brandeis 1913). While few would argue with the normative premise behind Brandeis's comment, many consequential policy decisions occur in private. Perhaps nowhere is the deviation from transparency-in-government more profound than in nomination politics, where the Senate's most unique institutional power (to defeat measures via obstruction) intersects with its most unique constitutional power (advice and consent) and can thwart the goals of nominating presidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald NS Unger. (Jun. 01, 2002). Anthony Fauci
    3/28/2021 College of the Holy Cross | Holy Cross Magazine [ Donald N. S. Unger. (Jun. 01, 2002). Anthony Fauci biographical profile, Summer 2002, Vol. 36, No. 03. Holy Cross Magazine. Reproduced for educational purposes only. Fair Use relied upon. ] Search | Site Index | Directions | Web Services | Calendar About HC | Admissions | Academics | Administration | Alumni & Friends | Athletics | Library Issue Home Readers Write "I saw people who were in pain" Editor's Note News from the Hill One of the country’s most visible and admired physicians and the director of the National Institute of Alumni / Advancement Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, Anthony S. Fauci, M.D.,’62 has led the fight against AIDS and, in the process, won the trust and respect of his one-time opponents. Athletics Book Notes By Donald N.S. Unger Class Notes One of the signal features of AIDS activism in the late 1980s was the In Memoriam vociferous attack mounted against federal agencies, like the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Road Signs the National Institutes of Health (NIH). These agencies were accused of doing too little, doing it too late, and often, of handcuffing individual Search the Magazine doctors and people with AIDS with medical regulations that were too cumbersome to deal with a fast moving and deadly epidemic. All Issues About the Magazine One of the most frequent accusers in this dialog was writer and activist Larry Kramer, founder of Act Up, the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, an organization founded in New York City in March of 1987, with the Campaign pdf avowed purpose—as its name implies—of taking a tactical line that might better be described as uncivil disobedience.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\19-4\NYL402.txt unknown Seq: 1 3-JAN-17 6:55 THE SENATE IN TRANSITION OR HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE NUCLEAR OPTION1 William G. Dauster* The right of United States Senators to debate without limit—and thus to filibuster—has characterized much of the Senate’s history. The Reid Pre- cedent, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s November 21, 2013, change to a sim- ple majority to confirm nominations—sometimes called the “nuclear option”—dramatically altered that right. This article considers the Senate’s right to debate, Senators’ increasing abuse of the filibuster, how Senator Reid executed his change, and possible expansions of the Reid Precedent. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 632 R I. THE NATURE OF THE SENATE ........................ 633 R II. THE FOUNDERS’ SENATE ............................. 637 R III. THE CLOTURE RULE ................................. 639 R IV. FILIBUSTER ABUSE .................................. 641 R V. THE REID PRECEDENT ............................... 645 R VI. CHANGING PROCEDURE THROUGH PRECEDENT ......... 649 R VII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION ........................ 656 R VIII. POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO THE REID PRECEDENT ........ 658 R A. Republican Reaction ............................ 659 R B. Legislation ...................................... 661 R C. Supreme Court Nominations ..................... 670 R D. Discharging Committees of Nominations ......... 672 R E. Overruling Home-State Senators ................. 674 R F. Overruling the Minority Leader .................. 677 R G. Time To Debate ................................ 680 R CONCLUSION................................................ 680 R * Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy for U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The author has worked on U.S. Senate and White House staffs since 1986, including as Staff Director or Deputy Staff Director for the Committees on the Budget, Labor and Human Resources, and Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Enforcing the Origination Clause in the House of Representatives
    Blue-Slipping: Enforcing the Origination Clause in the House of Representatives October 1, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46556 SUMMARY R46556 Blue-Slipping: Enforcing the Origination Clause October 1, 2020 in the House of Representatives James V. Saturno Article I, Section 7, clause 1, of the U.S. Constitution is known generally as the Origination Specialist on Congress and Clause because it requires that the Legislative Process All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills. As generally understood, this clause carries two kinds of prohibitions. First, the Senate may not originate any measure that includes a provision for raising revenue, and second, the Senate may not propose any amendment that would raise revenue to a House-passed non-revenue measure. However, the Senate may generally amend a House-originated revenue measure as it sees fit. Although the House may choose to enforce its prerogative through any of several methods, the most common is through the adoption of a privileged resolution returning the measure to the Senate. Because this resolution has historically been printed on blue paper, this is known as blue-slipping. This report also includes a table identifying all measures returned to the Senate as a result of a blue-slip resolution during the 102nd-116th Congresses (1991-2020). For more information on the Origination Clause and its enforcement, see CRS Report RL31399, The Origination Clause of the U.S. Constitution: Interpretation and Enforcement, by James V. Saturno. Congressional Research Service Blue-Slipping: Enforcing the Origination Clause in the House of Representatives Contents Tables Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstructing Agenda-Setting: Examining Blue Slip Behavior in the Senate
    The Forum Volume 9, Issue 4 2011 Article 9 GOVERNING THROUGH THE SENATE Obstructing Agenda-Setting: Examining Blue Slip Behavior in the Senate Ryan C. Black, Michigan State University Anthony J. Madonna, University of Georgia Ryan J. Owens, University of Wisconsin Recommended Citation: Black, Ryan C.; Madonna, Anthony J.; and Owens, Ryan J. (2011) "Obstructing Agenda- Setting: Examining Blue Slip Behavior in the Senate," The Forum: Vol. 9: Iss. 4, Article 9. DOI: 10.2202/1540-8884.1476 ©2012 De Gruyter. All rights reserved. Brought to you by | University of Wisconsin - Madison Libraries (University of Wisconsin - Madison Libraries) Authenticated | 172.16.1.226 Download Date | 7/11/12 5:57 PM Obstructing Agenda-Setting: Examining Blue Slip Behavior in the Senate Ryan C. Black, Anthony J. Madonna, and Ryan J. Owens Abstract Senators increasingly use obstructive tactics to stall or kill legislation. Unfortunately, because senators can obstruct privately, scholars have little understanding of the conditions under which they do so. Using previously unreleased data from 2001-2009, we examine Senate obstruction by focusing on blue slipping behavior. We find that extreme members who do not belong to the president's party are most likely to employ negative blue slips. Thus, as moderate senators continue to be replaced by more extreme members, senators will increasingly use obstructive tactics. KEYWORDS: Senate, agenda-setting, obstructive tactics Author Notes: Ryan C. Black ([email protected]) is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Michigan State University. His research and teaching interests focus on the federal courts, with a primary emphasis on the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS November 2'6, 19 79 Frederick A
    33534 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS November 2'6, 19 79 Frederick A. Rody, Jr., of Florida, to be ORDER FOR RECESS UNTIL 10:15 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Deputy Administrator of Drug Enforcement. A.M. TOMORROW Richard Cavins Matheron, of California, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Mr. ROBERT C. BYRD. Mr. Presi­ a Foreign Service officer of class 1, to be Sidney A. Diamond, of Arizona, to be Com­ Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipoten­ missioner of Patents and Trademarks. dent, I ask unanimous consent that tiary of the United States of America to the when the Senate completes its business DEPARTMENT OF STATE Kingdom of Swaziland. today, it stand in recess until the hour Patricia M. Byrne, of Ohio, a Foreign Serv­ Richard Cavins Matheron, of California, to of 10:15 a.m. tomorrow. ice officer of class 1, to be Ambassador Ex­ be Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipo­ traordinary and Plenipotentiary of the tentiary of the United States of America to The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. United States of America to the Socialist Re­ the Kingdom of Swaziland. public of the Union of Burma. Patricia M. Byrne, of Ohio, to be Ambassa­ Angler Biddle Duke, of New York, to be dor Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipoten­ United States of America to the Socialist tiary of the United States of America to the Republic of the Union of Burma. ORDER FOR RECOGNITION OF MR. LUGAR AND MR. TSONGAS ON TO­ Kingdom of Morocco. Angler Biddle Duke, of New York, to be MORROW Donald R. Toussaint, of Virginia, a For­ Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipoten­ eign Service officer of class 1, to be Am­ tiary of the United States of America to the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appointment Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: an Overview
    The Appointment Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: An Overview Updated June 17, 2016 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43762 The Appointment Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: An Overview Summary In recent decades, the process for appointing judges to the U.S. circuit courts of appeals and the U.S. district courts has been of continuing Senate interest. The responsibility for making these appointments is shared by the President and the Senate. Pursuant to the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, the President nominates persons to fill federal judgeships, with the appointment of each nominee also requiring Senate confirmation. Although not mentioned in the Constitution, an important role is also played midway in the appointment process by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Presidential Selection of Nominees The need for a President to make a circuit or district court nomination typically arises when a judgeship becomes or soon will become vacant. With almost no formal restrictions on whom the President may consider, an informal requirement is that judicial candidates are expected to meet a high standard of professional qualification. By custom, candidates whom the President considers for district judgeships are typically identified by home state Senators if the latter are of the President’s party, with such Senators, however, generally exerting less influence over the selection of circuit nominees. Another customary expectation is that the Administration, before the President selects a nominee, will consult both home state Senators, regardless of their party, to determine the acceptability to them of the candidate under consideration. In recent Administrations, the pre-nomination evaluation of judicial candidates has been performed jointly by staff in the White House Counsel’s Office and the Department of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grapes of Mcgrath: the Supreme Court and the Attorney General's
    The Grapes of McGrath: The Supreme Court and the Attorney General’s List of Subversive Organizations in Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath (1951) ROBERT JUSTIN GOLDSTEIN∗ The so-called Attorney General’s List of Subversive Organizations (AGLOSO) was one of the most central and widely publicized aspects of the post–World War II Red Scare, which has popularly—if inaccurately—become known as “McCarthyism.” Like many other elements of the Red Scare, the AGLOSO in fact predated the emergence of Senator Joseph McCarthy on the national political red-hunting scene. It originated in President Harry Truman’s Executive Order 9835 of March 21, 1947, which required all federal civil-service employees to be screened for “loyalty” and specified that one criterion to be used in determinations that “reasonable grounds exist for belief that the person involved is disloyal” would be a finding of “membership in, affiliation with or sympathetic association” with any organization determined by the Attorney General to be “totalitarian, Fascist, Communist, or subversive” or advocating or approving the forceful denial of constitutional rights to other persons or seeking “to alter the form of Government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”1 Beginning in late 1947, the federal government began publishing AGLOSO lists, which ultimately reached almost 300 organizations, without offering the targeted groups either hearings, specific charges, or advance notice. This led Washington Post editorial writer Alan Barth to term the Attorney General’s AGLOSO mandate “perhaps the most arbitrary and far-reaching power ever exercised by a THE GRAPES OF McGRATH 69 In 1947, President Harry Truman mandated that federal civil-service employees be screened for loyalty, with one consideration their membership in, affiliation with or sympathetic association; with organizations deter- mined by the Attorney General to be Communist, Fascist, totalitarian, or subversive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rearguard of Freedom: the John Birch Society and the Development
    The Rearguard of Freedom: The John Birch Society and the Development of Modern Conservatism in the United States, 1958-1968 by Bart Verhoeven, MA (English, American Studies), BA (English and Italian Languages) Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Arts July 2015 Abstract This thesis aims to investigate the role of the anti-communist John Birch Society within the greater American conservative field. More specifically, it focuses on the period from the Society's inception in 1958 to the beginning of its relative decline in significance, which can be situated after the first election of Richard M. Nixon as president in 1968. The main focus of the thesis lies on challenging more traditional classifications of the JBS as an extremist outcast divorced from the American political mainstream, and argues that through their innovative organizational methods, national presence, and capacity to link up a variety of domestic and international affairs to an overarching conspiratorial narrative, the Birchers were able to tap into a new and powerful force of largely white suburban conservatives and contribute significantly to the growth and development of the post-war New Right. For this purpose, the research interrogates the established scholarship and draws upon key primary source material, including official publications, internal communications and the private correspondence of founder and chairman Robert Welch as well as other prominent members. Acknowledgments The process of writing a PhD dissertation seems none too dissimilar from a loving marriage. It is a continuous and emotionally taxing struggle that leaves the individual's ego in constant peril, subjugates mind and soul to an incessant interplay between intense passion and grinding routine, and in most cases should not drag on for over four years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lawyer in Crisis Times: Joseph L. Raugh Jr., the Loyalty-Security Program, and the Defense of Civil Liberties in the Early Cold War Michael E
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 82 Number 5 Law, Loyalty, and Treason: How Can the Article 9 Law Regulate Loyalty Without Imperiling It? 6-1-2004 A Lawyer in Crisis Times: Joseph L. Raugh Jr., the Loyalty-Security Program, and the Defense of Civil Liberties in the Early Cold War Michael E. Parrish Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael E. Parrish, A Lawyer in Crisis Times: Joseph L. Raugh Jr., the Loyalty-Security Program, and the Defense of Civil Liberties in the Early Cold War, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 1799 (2004). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol82/iss5/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LAWYER IN CRISIS TIMES: JOSEPH L. RAUH, JR., THE LOYALTY-SECURITY PROGRAM, AND THE DEFENSE OF CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE EARLY COLD WAR MICHAEL E. PARRISH* This Article tells the story of Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., a lawyer who fought for American civil liberties during a time when they were in great peril. Rauh challenged the federal government's loyalty- security program during the height of McCarthyism and the Red Scare through his representation of government employees and contractors that were faced with termination and humiliation due to allegationsof disloyalty. This Article recounts Rauh's efforts by examining his representation of James Kutcher, William Remington, and Charles Allen Taylor, three men who were accused of disloyalty to the United States under the federal government's loyalty-security program.
    [Show full text]
  • Alwood, Edward, Dark Days in the Newsroom
    DARK DAYS IN THE NEWSROOM DARK DAYS in the NEWSROOM McCarthyism Aimed at the Press EDWARD ALWOOD TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS Philadelphia Temple University Press 1601 North Broad Street Philadelphia PA 19122 www.temple.edu/tempress Copyright © 2007 by Edward Alwood All rights reserved Published 2007 Printed in the United States of America Text design by Lynne Frost The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Alwood, Edward. Dark days in the newsroom : McCarthyism aimed at the press / Edward Alwood. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 13: 978-1-59213-341-3 ISBN 10: 1-59213-341-X (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 13: 978-1-59213-342-0 ISBN 10: 1-59213-342-8 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Anti-communist movements—United States—History—20th century. 2. McCarthy, Joseph, 1908–1957—Relations with journalists. 3. Journalists— United States—History—20th century. 4. Journalists—United States— Political activity—History—20th century. 5. Press and politics—United States—History—20th century. 6. United States—Politics and government— 1945–1953. 7. United States—Politics and government—1953–1961. I. Title. E743.5.A66 2007 973.921—dc22 2006034205 2 4 6 8 9 7 5 3 1 In Memoriam Margaret A. Blanchard Teacher, Mentor, and Friend Do the people of this land . desire to preserve those so carefully protected by the First Amendment: Liberty of religious worship, freedom of speech and of the press, and the right as freemen peaceably to assemble and petition their government for a redress of grievances? If so, let them withstand all beginnings of encroachment.
    [Show full text]