Quick viewing(Text Mode)

In the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore

In the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT

DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL

W.P.Nos. 23939-958/2014 (Excise) BETWEEN

1. MICKAEL PINTO S/O JAWAHAR PINTO AGED 24 YEARS, CL-9 LICENSEE, M/S GRAND MAGRATH, NO.30, MAGRATH ROAD, BANGALORE-560025.

2. M/S SIDDI ENTERPRISES REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, CL-9 LICENSE, NO.185, II FLOOR, DEENA BUILDING , BANGALORE, BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER P.M.ANANTH NARAYANA, S/O MANIKYA PRABHU, AGED 40 YEARS.

3. P M ANANTHANARAYANA S/O MANIKYA PRABHU, AGED 40 YEARS, CL-9 LICENSEE, 2 ND & 3RD FLOOR, PERELIAN MALL, CHURCH STREET, BANGALORE.

4. R RAVINDRA SINGH AGED 61 YEARS, OVAL BAR & RESTAURANT, CL 9 LICENSE, NO.1, 3RD FLOOR, MALL,

2

SARIGE ROAD, , BANGALORE-560003.

5. PAN FOOD SOLUTIONS PVT LTD A COMAPNY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT AND UNDER CL-9, LICENSE BY ITS DIRECTOR, RAJIV SINGH, NO.2006, 2ND FLOOR, 100 FT ROAD, , BANGALORE.

6. M/S SADHWANI BROTHERS CL-9 LICENSEE, NO.1 CHURCH STREET, BANGALORE-560001, BY ITS PARTNERS ASHOK SADHWANI S/O LATE ARJUN DAS SADHWANI AGED 47 YEARS.

7. M/S SADHWANI ENTERPRISES CL-9 LICENSEE, LAKSHMI PLAZA, NO.65, RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE-560025, BY ITS PATNER ASHOK SADHWANI, S/O LATE ARJUN DAS SADHWANI, AGED 47 YEARS

8. M/S SADHWANI VENTURES CL-9 LICENSEE, NO.1 ST AND 2 ND MEZZANINE FLOOR, SAI COMPLEX, NO.114/1, M.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560001, BY ITS PARTNER ASHOK SADHWANI S/O ARJUN SADHWANI, AGED 47 YEARS.

9. K B VENKATESH S/O BASAVANNAPPA, CL 9 LICENSEE, 2ND FLOOR, COPPER CHIMNEY RESTAURANT 100 FT ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038.

3

10.ANGAD BHATHIJA S/O VIJAY BHATHIJA AGED 33 YEARS, CL-9 LICENSEE, PUNJABI TIMES, NO.23, 24 AND 25, 3RD FLOOR, OUTER RING ROAD, VILLAGE, BANGALORE.

11.M/S JUDY KOSHI CL 9 LICENSEE, 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR, NO.40, MILLER ROAD, BANGALORE-560052.

12.V RAJESH S/O PERUMAL NAIOV, CL-9 LICENSEE, NO.3, PALACE GROUNDS, RAMANA MAHARSHI ROAD, BANGALORE.

13.M/S SANGRILA BAR AND RESTAURANT CL 9 LICENSEE, CHOKKANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, R.K.HEGDENAGARA, BY TIS MANAGING PARTNER, LASA DHOLMA

14.B Y RAMACHANDRA S/O YATHIRAJULU NAIDU, CL-9 LICENSEE, NO.30, 1ST FLOOR, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560053.

15.M/S SIDHI LEISURE AND LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITD, CL-9 LICENSEE RVB LE ROCK PUB CAFE, NO.3, SWADESHI TOWERS, REST HOUSE ROAD, OFF BRIGADE ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.

4

16.R JAYARATHNA CL 9 LICENSEE LEGENDS OF ROCK, NO.905, 2ND FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, 6TH BLOCK, 80 FT ROAD, , BANGALORE-560095.

17.M/S SIROCCO HOTELS PVT.LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT & CL-9 LICENSEE, BY ITS DIRECTOR, G.R.GANESH, S/O G.S.RAMACHANDRAPPA, NO.8/6, ROAD, BANGALORE.

18.M/S ASCOT HOTELS REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, CL-7 LICENSEE, NO.39, BRIGADE ROAD, BY TIS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HARISH S.LAKIHANI

19.A L SATYNARAYANA GUPTA S/O LATE A.S.LAKSHMIKANTH SETTY, AGED 54 YEARS, CL-2, SUNDAR WINES, 149, BYRASANDRA MAIN ROAD, 1ST BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE.

20.A L SATYANARAYANA GUPTA S/O LATE A.S. LAKSHMIKANTH SETTY, AGED 54 YEARS, CL-2, MANJUANTHA WINES, BTS MAIN ROAD, , BANGALORE. ... PETITIONERS

(BY SRI G.K. BHAT, ADV.)

5

AND

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, , BANGALORE-560001.

2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER IN KARNATAKA, 2ND FLOOR, TTMC BUILDING, "A" BLOCK, BMTC DEPOT COMPLEX, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027

3. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE.

4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER , BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENTS

************

THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED MEMO AS PER ANNX-A DT.19.3.2014 ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND ETC.

THESE PETITIONS ARE COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Though these matters are listed for non-compliance of office objections, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that in view of the judgment in W.P.Nos.22422-

22512/2014 and connected cases, it has become unnecessary

6

to pursue the writ petitions and hence, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.

Placing the memo on record, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- JUDGE

VP

Top View