Theologia and Oikonomia: the Soteriological Ground of Gregory of Nazianzus's Trinitarian Theology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Durham E-Theses THEOLOGIA AND OIKONOMIA: THE SOTERIOLOGICAL GROUND OF GREGORY OF NAZIANZUS'S TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY. JASHI, ZURAB How to cite: JASHI, ZURAB (2010) THEOLOGIA AND OIKONOMIA: THE SOTERIOLOGICAL GROUND OF GREGORY OF NAZIANZUS'S TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/619/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THEOLOGIA AND OIKONOMIA THE SOTERIOLOGICAL GROUND OF GREGORY OF NAZIANZUS’S TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY by ZURAB JASHI A thesis submitted for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Theology and Religion University of Durham September, 2010 Abstract This dissertation explores the soteriological ground of the trinitarian theology of Gregory of Nazianzus and establishes a consistent link in his thought between the spheres of oikonomia and theologia . His writings are studied against the background of contemporary theological and philosophical trends thus demonstrating the context within which he elaborated his main theological concepts as well as their novelty. Although Gregory drew heavily on the heritage of his intellectual master Origen, he significantly changed his perspective from cosmological speculations to reflections on the historical embodiment of Christ’s salvific activity. This shift was to lead Gregory towards a positive view of the body and of bodily desire which he considered a vital force in human existence capable of union with God in the process of deification. Gregory thus fully identified Christ with humanity in its total manifestation, including the human mind with its fallen and rebellious desire, now assumed and redeemed in the incarnation. Hence Gregory placed the suffering image of Christ at the heart of his trinitarian theological construction. As this thesis argues, around this image evolves the whole dogmatic edifice of Gregory’s theology. Christ’s divine sovereignty is understood not in separation and independence from the passion on Cross. Rather, its full manifestation is only possible because of the cross, because of Christ’s free and willing acceptance of it. The whole set of interrelationships between the suffering Christ and the Father and the Holy Spirit are depicted according to the logic of coincidence of sovereignty and humiliation. It is precisely in this combination of theological themes – expressed with our new concept of “kenotic sovereignty” – that the focus of the present thesis is located. This innovative spiritual disposition shapes both Gregory’s theological epistemology and his hermeneutical strategy. Arguing for the possibility of knowing the divine in and through human bodily existence and corroborating this view with suitably interpreted Scriptural evidence, he opens the horizons for the human ascension to the realm of the divine trinitarian life. In this way Gregory envisages access to the transcendent theology of the Trinity which is understood by him in purely personal terms, insofar as it implies the intimate conversation of God with us “as friends” (Or. 38.7). This unique reworking of classical and Christian themes is possible because of Gregory’s insistence that divine sovereignty and transcendence become intelligible exclusively in the context of Easter. Thus the habitually neglected narrative of the cross and resurrection of Christ in the thought of the Theologian is the only key to unlock his understanding of the luminous mystery of the Trinity. Contents Introduction _________________________________________________________ 5 a) The scope of this study ____________________________________________________ 5 b) The contributions of this study _____________________________________________ 6 c) The methodology and structure of the dissertation _____________________________ 7 d) Literature Review: The complexity of the definition of Gregory of Nazianzus’s theology___________________________________________________________________ 7 Part One: The Interrelationship between the Son of God and Human Nature ___ 23 1.1. The Anthropological Foundations of the Interrelation between the Son of God and Human Nature. ___________________________________________________________ 24 1.1.1. Interrelation of Logos with the Human Soul. _________________________________________ 24 1.1.2. The Interrelation between Logos and the Human Body. ________________________________ 36 1.2. The Christological Foundations of the Interrelationship between the Son of God and Human nature. ____________________________________________________________ 45 1.2.1. The Unity of Christ._____________________________________________________________ 46 1.2.2. The Deification of the Humanity in Christ ___________________________________________ 49 1.3. Conclusion______________________________________________________ 57 Part Two: The Interrelationship between the Persons of the Trinity in the Economy ___________________________________________________________________ 58 2.1. The Interrelation between the Son and the Father ___________________________ 59 2.1.1. Mediatorship in the Creation______________________________________________________ 59 2.1.2. The Mediatorship in the Knowledge of God _________________________________________ 68 2.1.3. The Mediatorship of the Son in the Salvific Activity and Will ___________________________ 71 2.1.4. The Priesthood of the Son ________________________________________________________ 74 2.2. The Interrelationship between the Son and the Holy Spirit in the Economy ______ 80 2.2.1. The Spirit as a Gift of the Salvation ________________________________________________ 81 2.2.2. The Dwelling of the Spirit in the Son in Their Relationship with the Father ________________ 88 2.3. Conclusion ____________________________________________________________ 94 Part Three: The Knowledge of the Immanent Trinity _______________________ 96 3.1. The Theological Epistemology ______________________________________ 97 3.1.1. The Desire for the Substance of God _______________________________________________ 98 3.1.2. The Spirit of the History of Salvation______________________________________________ 109 3.2. Theology: The Ontology of Paradox ________________________________ 113 3.2.1. The Triune Light ______________________________________________________________ 114 3.2.2. The Triune Movement__________________________________________________________ 123 3.3. Conclusion_____________________________________________________ 133 General Conclusion _________________________________________________ 135 Bibliography_______________________________________________________ 141 Declaration of Authorship and Note on Copyright: The material presented in the thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree in this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published in any format, including electronic and the Internet, without the author’s prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must be acknowledged appropriately. Introduction This study aims to explore the ways of formation of the trinitarian theology on the basis of the divine economy in the thought of Gregory of Nazianzus. There is a story how Thales could not notice a pit and fell in it while observing the sky. So during the centuries and even now there prevails the tendency to conceive the doctrine of the Trinity as a sky of abstract intellectual speculations that deprives us from seeing the actual problems in our interrelationship with God and with our fellow human beings. The last century, however, has seen a revival in the study of the Trinity. Prominent theologians of various Christian confessions began exploring the vital importance of the Trinity for the life of the Church as well as for each human person. Their striving to respond to the challenges of contemporary life by way of returning to the wisdom of the Church tradition is a very valuable enterprise. Yet, sometimes one is obliged to acknowledge that what people are finding in the tradition is what they already know. Thus modern theories of the so called social trinitarianism have failed to justify their claim to be heirs of the Trinitarian theology of the Church Father and especially of the Cappadocian Fathers. This agenda in contemporary theology inspires the present study as well. The spiritual disposition of the theologians of that past which has motivated them to construct such a paradoxical vision of God represents great challenge for our minds today. Chief among the patristic thinkers who fall in this category is Gregory of Nazianzus. Perhaps more than anywhere else it is in his writings that we find an understanding of the Trinity which is at the same time an unreachable final mystery and an attainable “crown” of our saving confession. a) The scope of this study The research will be engaged with the elucidation