DOCSLIB.ORG

Character Luck and Moral Responsibility: the Character of the Ordinary Person in Aristotle's Rhetoric and Politics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2017 Character Luck and Moral Responsibility: The Character of the Ordinary Person in Aristotle's Rhetoric and Politics Marcella Linn Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Linn, Marcella, "Character Luck and Moral Responsibility: The Character of the Ordinary Person in Aristotle's Rhetoric and Politics" (2017). Dissertations. 2594. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2594 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2017 Marcella Linn LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO CHARACTER LUCK AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY: THE CHARACTER OF THE ORDINARY PERSON IN ARISTOTLE’S RHETORIC AND POLITICS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN PHILOSOPHY BY MARCELLA LINN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2017 Copyright by Marcella Linn, 2017 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS So many have helped me in the preparation of this dissertation that I wonder how little I have contributed myself. To start, I would like to thank my director, Dr. Thomas Carson whose many, many comments aided enormously in refining my writing and developing the ideas in this dissertation. From the start, he has been encouraging and supportive, reading draft after draft after draft and guiding this project to its completion. My ability to think and write philosophically continues to be refined under his guidance. I am very fortune to have worked with him and to have thought through many of the ideas in this dissertation with him. I would also like to express my gratitude for the significant role Dr. Julie Ward has played in my development as a writer and thinker. My knowledge of Aristotle is indebted to her teaching and her guidance as director of my master’s paper and reader of my dissertation. On several occasions, she played a pivotal role in my interpretation and use of Aristotle, which helped my project evolve in original and interesting ways. The time she has so generously dedicated to me as her student is appreciated beyond measure. I am also so thankful for her advising over the years, which has helped me throughout my progress as a graduate student. I also thank Dr. J.D. Trout, who not only agreed to be a reader for this dissertation, but so generously agreed to read an earlier draft of one of my chapters. His comments on that draft helped me in each of my subsequent revisions by keeping me focused on some of the bigger questions about using Aristotle in relation to contemporary issues. In addition to his help on my dissertation, my work as his teaching and research assistant was crucial for my becoming iii familiar with the vast literature on cognitive biases. It was as his teaching assistant that I was first introduced to the situationist position. Many of the faculty at Loyola have advised me on various issues concerning coursework, teaching, proposing and writing a dissertation, and preparing for the job market. I would like to mention a few who have made a significant contribution in one way or another. I thank Dr. Victoria Wike for all the meetings, conversations, and email exchanges that helped me navigate the various intricacies of graduate student life. I thank Dr. Kristen Irwin for her enthusiastic support. Even though I was not her student, she advised me on several occasions on beginning a dissertation, preparing for the job market, and preparing for my first on-campus interview. I especially thank Dr. Jason Rheins who met with me when I was trying to figure out a topic for my dissertation and advised me on other occasions as well. He generously offered his time for a summer reading group on Aristotle with me and some other students. I also benefitted from the work I did for him as his teaching assistant, which helped me develop a familiarity with Ancient Greek philosophy. During this time, I was beginning work on my dissertation proposal and benefited a great deal from the conversations I had with Dr. Rheins about Aristotle, moral luck, and situationism. I have also benefited from the numerous conversations I have had with my fellow graduate students, be they during seminar, in the grad lounge, or over a post-seminar beer. I will always cherish their friendship and conversation and the community that we formed throughout our time at Loyola. iv I am thankful for the audience at the fall of 2016 History of Philosophy Roundtable meeting. I relied heavily on the comments I received there when revising. I am especially thankful for Robby Duncan and Dr. David Ozar’s comments and interest. I want to say a big thank you to all the department assistants who helped me on numerous occasions on matters small and large. Thank you: Holly, Bryn, Molly, Lauren, Lucas, and Miguel. I was also very lucky to have gotten the Pre-Doctoral Teaching Scholars Fellowship (2015-2016) and the Arthur J. Schmitt Dissertation Fellowship (2016-2017). Without this funding, I would not have been able to complete half the work I did over the last two years. I would like to express a special thank you to Dr. Gregory Dobrov for teaching me Greek and for being a wonderful and dedicated professor. Though his time on earth was too short, his work will outlast all of us. I can hardly read a word of Greek without recalling one of his animated lectures and without wishing I could hear just one more. All the contributions from the faculty, staff, and graduate students at Loyola would have been for nothing had I not had the support of my family. I’d like to thank my parents for an upbringing that made all the difference. I especially must thank my sister, Maria, who has been a second mother to my kids and a lifelong friend to me. I do not know that anyone has a sister as selfless as she. For over a decade, she has arranged her work schedule semester after semester in order to accommodate my childcare needs and continues to spend every day off helping me juggle work and childcare. She also generously offered her time to format this dissertation – a time consuming and frustrating process, especially given my struggles with technology. I cannot thank her enough for what she has done for my family, and I would be lucky to have the opportunity to return her generosity. v Lastly, I thank my husband, Joe, and our kids. Those kids have brought such joy and love to my life and have motivated me beyond measure. Throughout every difficulty, Joe has been an unending source of love and support. His kindness and thoughtfulness have sustained me each time I have felt depleted. And, his conversation and wisdom have inspired me. My life is full because of him, and every word I have written is for him. vi To Joe TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii ABSTRACT x CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER TWO: LUCK, MORAL LUCK, AND CHARACTER LUCK 14 I. A General Account of Luck 15 II. Transition from a General Account of Luck to Moral Luck 23 III. Moral Luck and Character Luck 36 IV. Character Luck and Responsibility 44 1. Sher on Blame for Traits 48 2. Moody-Adams on Acting Out of Character 50 3. Trianosky on Active Temperaments 53 4. Card on Forward-Looking Responsibility for Character 57 V. The Need for an Account of Ordinary Character and Responsibility 58 CHAPTER THREE: CHARACTER, CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ARISTOTLE’S NICOMACHEAN ETHICS 60 I. Habituation in EN II.1-3 63 II. EN III.1-5’s Conditions for Responsibility 74 III. Conclusion 82 CHAPTER FOUR: GENETIC INHERITANCES AND NATURAL TEMPERAMENTS: CHARACTER, CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ARISTOTLE’S RHETORIC 85 I. Responsibility in the EN and Ideal Candidates for Virtue 86 II. The Rhetoric on Temperament and Responsibility 88 1. Moral and Natural Development 90 2. Responsibility in the Rhetoric 93 III. Another Model of Responsibility 110 1. Natural Virtue and Habituated States 111 2. The Genus of the Temperaments of the Ordinary Citizen 114 3. Responsibility for a Temperament 116 IV. Conclusion 120 CHAPTER FIVE: SOCIAL INHERITANCES: CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT AND MORAL UNDERSTANDING IN ARISTOTLE’S POLITICS AND RHETORIC 122 I. Ethics, Politics, and the Non-Ideal in Aristotle 123 II. Aristotle’s Account of Moral Awareness in the Politics 127 1. The Roles of Law and Family in Upbringing and Moral Awareness 127 2. Moral Education and Moral Awareness 133 viii III. Character Development and Maintenance and One’s Circumstances 138 1. Rhetoric II.15-17 and Politics IV.11 on the Importance of Circumstances for Development and Moral Awareness 139 IV. Responsibility and One’s Upbringing 148 V. Conclusion 152 CHAPTER SIX: ARISTOTLE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: THE EMPIRICAL ADEQUACY OF CHARACTER 156 I. The Studies and Their Interpretations 160 1. Key Concepts 166 2. Doris and Local Traits 170 3. Miller and Global Traits 172 4. Assessing Miller and Doris 176 II. Aristotle and Situationism 178 1. Aristotle on Actual Virtue 179 2. Aristotle on Ordinary Virtues 187 3. Fragmented Character and Behavioral Inconsistencies 191 III. Ordinary Character as a Temperament: An Example 193 IV. Further Implications for Moral Education 201 V.
Recommended publications
  • Churchland Source: the Journal of Philosophy, Vol

    Churchland Source: the Journal of Philosophy, Vol

    Journal of Philosophy, Inc. Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States Author(s): Paul M. Churchland Source: The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, No. 1 (Jan., 1985), pp. 8-28 Published by: Journal of Philosophy, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2026509 Accessed: 07-08-2015 19:14 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Philosophy, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Philosophy. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 142.58.129.109 on Fri, 07 Aug 2015 19:14:45 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 8 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY structureof this idiom, moreover-its embeddingof a subordinate sentence-would have been clearly dictatedby its primitiveuse in assessing children's acquisition of observationsentences. Analogi- cal extension of the idiom to other than observation sentences would follow inevitably,and the developmentof parallel idioms for other propositional attitudeswould then come naturally too, notwithstanding their opacity from a logical point of view. Naturalness is one thing, transparencyanother; familiarityone, clarityanother. W. V. QtJINE Harvard University REDUCTION, QUALIA, AND THE DIRECT INTROSPECTION OF BRAIN STATES* DO the phenomenological or qualitative featuresof our sen- sations constitutea permanentbarrier to thereductive aspi- rations of any materialisticneuroscience? I here argue that theydo not.
  • The Absurd Author(S): Thomas Nagel Reviewed Work(S): Source: the Journal of Philosophy, Vol

    The Absurd Author(S): Thomas Nagel Reviewed Work(S): Source: the Journal of Philosophy, Vol

    Journal of Philosophy, Inc. The Absurd Author(s): Thomas Nagel Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 68, No. 20, Sixty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division (Oct. 21, 1971), pp. 716-727 Published by: Journal of Philosophy, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2024942 . Accessed: 19/08/2012 01:08 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Philosophy, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Philosophy. http://www.jstor.org 7i6 THE JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY The formerstands as valid only if we can findcriteria for assigning a differentlogical formto 'allegedly' than to 'compulsively'.In this case, the criteriaexist: 'compulsively'is a predicate, 'allegedly' a sentenceadverb. But in countless other cases, counterexamplesare not so easily dismissed.Such an example, bearing on the inference in question, is Otto closed the door partway ThereforeOtto closed the door It seems clear to me that betterdata are needed beforeprogress can be made in this area; we need much more refinedlinguistic classificationsof adverbial constructionsthan are presentlyavail- able, ifour evidenceconcerning validity is to be good enough to per- mit a richerlogical theory.In the meantime,Montague's account stands: thereis no reason to thinka morerefined theory, if it can be produced, should not be obtainable within the frameworkhe has given us.
  • Rosalind Hursthouse, on Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999

    Rosalind Hursthouse, on Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999

    Rosalind Hursthouse, On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. x, 275. Reviewed by Gilbert Harman, Department of Philosophy, Princeton Univer- sity Virtue ethics is atype of ethicaltheory in which the notion of virtue or good character plays a central role. This splendid new book describes a “program” for the development of a particular (“Aristotelian”) form of virtue ethics. The book is intended to be used as a textbook, but should be read by anyone interested in moral philosophy. Hursthouse has been a major contributor to the development of virtue ethics and the program she describes, while making use of the many contributions of others, is very much her program, with numerous new ideas and insights. The book has three parts. The first dispels common misunderstandings and explains how virtue ethics applies to complex moral issues. The sec- ond discusses moral motivation, especially the motivation involved in doing something because it is right. The third explains how questions about the objectivity of ethics are to be approached within virtue ethics. Structure Hursthouse’s virtue ethics takes as central the conception of a human be- ing who possesses all ethical virtues of character and no vices or defects of character—”human being” rather than “person” because the relevant char- acter traits are “natural” to the species. To a first approximation, virtue ethics says that a right action is an action among those available that a perfectly virtuous human being would charac- teristically do under the circumstances. This is only a first approximation because of complications required in order accurately to describe certain moral dilemmas.
  • Brilliant Star: Moral Character Development

    Brilliant Star: Moral Character Development

    MORAL AND CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT 1 Moral and Character Development Gordon Vessels and William Huitt Citation: Vessels, G., & Huitt, W. (2005). Moral and character development. Paper presented at the National Youth at Risk Conference, Savannah, GA, March 8-10. Retrieved [date], from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/papers/chardev.pdf Moral character development has been a topic of concern for thousands of years. It was central to the development of American schooling, but lost favor in the middle of the 20th century. Over the last several decades there has been increased attention paid to the importance of moral character as central to the purpose of schooling. This paper reviews the most important theories related to moral character development and suggests methods for including it in the school setting. The development of moral character has been the subject of philosophical and psychological investigation since Aristotle theorized three levels of moral character development: an ethics of fear, an ethics of shame, an ethics of wisdom (Kraut, 2001). Philosophers, psychologists, and educators as diverse as John Locke, John Stuart Mill, Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, and John Dewey, and as ancient as Confucius, Plato, and Aristotle have viewed the development of moral character as the primary purpose of schooling (Purpel & Ryan, 1976). From the beginning of American public education in the 1600s until the first third of the 20th century, our nation’s educators, working closely with parents and the community, performed this moral-educational role with commitment (McClellan, 1992). In the middle of the 20th century, moral character education in the schools (hereafter used interchangeably with the term character education) began to decline as a result of increased cultural diversity, perplexing and seemingly prohibitive First Amendment decisions, uncertainty about what values to teach and how to teach them, a preoccupation with social movements, and a Cold War emphasis on increasing academic achievement (Vessels & Boyd, 1996; Wynne & Walberg, 1997).
  • Immoral Acts and Their Resultant Effect Among the Muslim Society: an Islamic Exposition

    Immoral Acts and Their Resultant Effect Among the Muslim Society: an Islamic Exposition

    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 9, Issue 4, April 2019 440 ISSN 2250-3153 Immoral Acts and their Resultant Effect among the Muslim Society: An Islamic Exposition Dr. Attahir Shehu Mainiyo1 Department of Islamic Studies, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto [email protected] [email protected] +234 80 60060 197 +234 80 35534 192 Ahmad Bello Gidadawa, Admin and General Services, Office of the Head of service, Cabinet Office, Sokoto +2347066666577 DOI: 10.29322/IJSRP.9.04.2019.p8857 http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.04.2019.p8857 Abstract: High moral standard is said to be a core pillar which ensures prosperity of individuals and the society generally. Man therefore, is born with a moral sense which clearly enables him to differentiate between right and wrong, good and bad. That is why it is not out of place to say a society, shrouded in immoral acts is certain to breed wayward and unscrupulous elements. In order to actually submit to the good morality, one must speak the truth, keep promises, respect family ties, and help the poor, less privileged and weak ones. This possibly has not been unconnected with the fact that the Muslims took their guidance from the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W2.). Sadly enough, these moral qualities that ought to be imbibed by all and sundry diminish or were drastically absent among the Muslim society today. In order to get out of the bondage of servitude of one’s desire to commit certain immoral acts, everyone in the society desires efficient knowledge and skill, societal norms and values.
  • Distinguishing Science from Philosophy: a Critical Assessment of Thomas Nagel's Recommendation for Public Education Melissa Lammey

    Distinguishing Science from Philosophy: a Critical Assessment of Thomas Nagel's Recommendation for Public Education Melissa Lammey

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2012 Distinguishing Science from Philosophy: A Critical Assessment of Thomas Nagel's Recommendation for Public Education Melissa Lammey Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES DISTINGUISHING SCIENCE FROM PHILOSOPHY: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF THOMAS NAGEL’S RECOMMENDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION By MELISSA LAMMEY A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2012 Melissa Lammey defended this dissertation on February 10, 2012. The members of the supervisory committee were: Michael Ruse Professor Directing Dissertation Sherry Southerland University Representative Justin Leiber Committee Member Piers Rawling Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Warren & Irene Wilson iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is my pleasure to acknowledge the contributions of Michael Ruse to my academic development. Without his direction, this dissertation would not have been possible and I am indebted to him for his patience, persistence, and guidance. I would also like to acknowledge the efforts of Sherry Southerland in helping me to learn more about science and science education and for her guidance throughout this project. In addition, I am grateful to Piers Rawling and Justin Leiber for their service on my committee. I would like to thank Stephen Konscol for his vital and continuing support.
  • Character Education in Islamic Perspective

    Character Education in Islamic Perspective

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2, FEBRUARY 2013 ISSN 2277-8616 Character Education in Islamic Perspective Dindin Jamaluddin Abstract: - The purpose of the article is to explained the characters education in the perspective of Islam as a fundamental human lives. The method of analysis used is study of literature juxtaposed with actual phenomena that happen to community. The analysis and discussion shows that character education is essential to the national education curriculum implemented. Index Terms: - Character, Education, Islamic Perspective. ———————————————————— 1 INTRODUCTION Because of the love of Allah, man is not left without his In recent years, the study of civil society and the concern of direction and guidance on the value of how to say and behave. national education are the hot topics which are being If these values are obeyed, it will be a beautiful fence that will discussed. Slogan after slogan echoed, tried to raise “the new keep those who obey it from sliding to the abyss of deviation Indonesia”. Various concepts appears try to make the Ideal of negative behavior, not only for himself, but for the Indonesia come to reality. With the current globalization, community and environment. Abdul Hamid al-Shaidi al-Zantani education in Indonesia faced with enormous challenges. asserts that people need hidayah al-din that illuminates his These challenges often imply a shift in the religious and reasons, his knowledge, and his will. If everything is left to the cultural values that have existed in the midst of society. May 2, ability of his reason alone, he would be misguided, if 2010, Minister of National Education (now Minister of National everything is left to his knowledge alone, certainly he will not Culture and Education) declares the start of the national understand and will not comprehend.
  • The Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy

    The Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy

    Introduction n recent years the classical authors of Anglo-Saxon pragmatism have gar- Inered a renewed importance in international philosophical circles. In the aftermath of the linguistic turn, philosophers such as Charles S. Peirce, William James, George H. Mead, Ferdinand C. S. Schiller, and John Dewey are being reread alongside, for example, recent postmodern and deconstructivist thought as alternatives to a traditional orientation toward the concerns of a represen- tationalist epistemology. In the context of contemporary continental thought, the work of Jacques Derrida, Jean-Francois Lyotard, and Gilles Deleuze comprises just a few examples of a culturewide assault on a metaphysical worldview premised on what Michel Foucault called the empirico-transcendental doublet, and presents a wealth of potential exchange with the pragmatist critique of representationalism. In both cases, aspects of pragmatist thought are being used to add flexibility to the conceptual tools of modern philoso- phy, in order to promote a style of philosophizing more apt to dealing with the problems of everyday life. The hope for a pragmatic “renewing of phi- losophy” (Putnam) evidenced in these trends has led to an analytic reexami- nation of some of the fundamental positions in modern continental thought as well, and to a recognition of previously unacknowledged or underappreciated pragmatic elements in thinkers like Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein. Within the current analytic discussions, a wide spectrum of differing and at times completely heterogeneous forms of neopragmatism can be distinguished, which for heuristic purposes can be grouped into two general categories according to the type of discursive strategy employed. The first of these consists in a conscious inflation of the concept of pragmatism in order to establish it as widely as possible within the disciplinary discourse of philosophy.
  • Consequences of Pragmatism University of Minnesota Press, 1982

    Consequences of Pragmatism University of Minnesota Press, 1982

    estratto dal volume: RICHARD RORTY Consequences of Pragmatism University of Minnesota Press, 1982 INTRODUCTION 1. Platonists, Positivists, and Pragmatists The essays in this book are attempts to draw consequences from a prag- matist theory about truth. This theory says that truth is not the sort of thing one should expect to have a philosophically interesting theory about. For pragmatists, “truth” is just the name of a property which all true statements share. It is what is common to “Bacon did not write Shakespeare,” “It rained yesterday,” “E equals mc²” “Love is better than hate,” “The Alle- gory of Painting was Vermeer’s best work,” “2 plus 2 is 4,” and “There are nondenumerable infinities.” Pragmatists doubt that there is much to be said about this common feature. They doubt this for the same reason they doubt that there is much to be said about the common feature shared by such morally praiseworthy actions as Susan leaving her husband, Ameri- ca joining the war against the Nazis, America pulling out of Vietnam, Socrates not escaping from jail, Roger picking up litter from the trail, and the suicide of the Jews at Masada. They see certain acts as good ones to perform, under the circumstances, but doubt that there is anything gen- eral and useful to say about what makes them all good. The assertion of a given sentence—or the adoption of a disposition to assert the sentence, the conscious acquisition of a belief—is a justifiable, praiseworthy act in certain circumstances. But, a fortiori, it is not likely that there is something general and useful to be said about what makes All such actions good-about the common feature of all the sentences which one should ac- quire a disposition to assert.
  • THE HORNSWOGGLE PROBLEM1 Patricia Smith Churchland, Department of Philosophy, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

    THE HORNSWOGGLE PROBLEM1 Patricia Smith Churchland, Department of Philosophy, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

    Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, No. 5ñ6, 1996, pp. 402ñ8 THE HORNSWOGGLE PROBLEM1 Patricia Smith Churchland, Department of Philosophy, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Abstract: Beginning with Thomas Nagel, various philosophers have propsed setting con- scious experience apart from all other problems of the mind as ëthe most difficult problemí. When critically examined, the basis for this proposal reveals itself to be unconvincing and counter-productive. Use of our current ignorance as a premise to determine what we can never discover is one common logical flaw. Use of ëI-cannot-imagineí arguments is a related flaw. When not much is known about a domain of phenomena, our inability to imagine a mechanism is a rather uninteresting psychological fact about us, not an interesting metaphysical fact about the world. Rather than worrying too much about the meta-problem of whether or not consciousness is uniquely hard, I propose we get on with the task of seeing how far we get when we address neurobiologically the problems of mental phenomena. I: Introduction Conceptualizing a problem so we can ask the right questions and design revealing experiments is crucial to discovering a satisfactory solution to the problem. Asking where animal spirits are concocted, for example, turns out not to be the right question to ask about the heart. When Harvey asked instead, ëHow much blood does the heart pump in an hour?í, he conceptualized the problem of heart function very differently. The recon- ceptualization was pivotal in coming to understand that the heart is really a pump for circulating blood; there are no animal spirits to concoct.
  • JL Mackie – “The Subjectivity of Values” Thomas Nagel – “Ethics”

    JL Mackie – “The Subjectivity of Values” Thomas Nagel – “Ethics”

    Lecture 23: The Objectivity or Subjectivity of Morality J. L. Mackie – “The Subjectivity of Values” Thomas Nagel – “Ethics” 1 Agenda 1. J. L. Mackie 2. Thomas Nagel 3. Ethics versus Metaethics 4. What Does it Mean for Morality to be Objective? 5. Argument from Relativity 6. Argument from Queerness 2 J. L. Mackie • John Leslie Mackie (1917 – 1981) • Australian philosopher from Sydney. • Interested in metaphysics, philosophy of language, ethics, metaethics, and the philosophy of religion. • Professor of philosophy at the University of Otago in New Zealand from 1955 to 1959. The Challis Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sydney from 1959 to 1963. Chair of philosophy in the University of York from 1963-1967. 3 Thomas Nagel • 1931 – present • Professor of Philosophy and Law Emeritus at New York University. • Works in political philosophy, ethics, philosophy of mind, and epistemology. • PhD from Harvard. 4 Ethics versus Metaethics • First order moral questions concern how you ought to act. (Theoretical and Practical Ethics) • Second order moral questions concern the nature of morality. For example, is morality objective? (Metaethics) • Are first order and second order moral questions completely independent? 5 What Does it Mean for Morality to be Objective? • Mackie says that when he is denying the objectivity of morality, he is denying that any categorical imperative is objectively valid. “The objective values which I am denying would be action-directing absolutely, not contingently… upon the agent’s desires and inclinations” (2). • Mackie understands himself to be espousing an error theory, namely “a theory that although most people in making moral judgments implicitly claim… to be pointing to something objectively prescriptive, these claims are all false” (3).
  • Chapter 7 Moral-Character Education

    Chapter 7 Moral-Character Education

    289 Chapter 7 Moral-Character Education Daniel Lapsley and David Yeager Moral-Character Education This chapter addresses one of the foundational issues that confront parents and educators: What is to be done about the moral character formation of children? Few would doubt that raising children of strong moral character is a highly desirable goal for socialization. Most parents would be disappointed if their children entered adulthood with only slight acquaintance with moral norms, dispositions, or emotions, or evinced these qualities only on occasion. But not only parents. The development of moral character is also a broadly shared goal that animates the work of socialization agents in every contextual setting that involves children, including schools and churches, youth organizations and other community institutions. Indeed, the concern over the proper induction of the younger generation by the older into the norms and canons of good conduct is probably a universal of the human experience. Yet the terms of reference for moral character education (MCE) is broadly contested whatever the basic agreement on the desirability of its goals (Goodman & Lesnick, 2001). Historically, the terms moral education and character education have pointed to different psychological traditions, ethical theories, curricular objectives and pedagogical preferences. Whether one is a moral educator or a character educator is thought to reveal something about one’s paradigmatic allegiances, about where one stands in terms of certain defining issues that sorts one into rival camps, with each camp having its own professional society (e.g., Association for Moral Education, the Character Education Partnership) and professional journal (e.g., Journal of Moral Education, Journal of Research in Character Education).