Sempra Energy 2019 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
El Paso Energy Corporation (“El Paso”) and PG&E Corporation (“PG&E”) (Collectively The
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER TO AID PUBLIC COMMENT I. Introduction The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) has accepted for public comment from the El Paso Energy Corporation (“El Paso”) and PG&E Corporation (“PG&E”) (collectively the “Proposed Respondents”) an Agreement Containing Consent Order (“the Proposed Consent Order”). The Proposed Consent Order remedies the likely anticompetitive effects in the natural gas transportation markets in the Permian Basin production area, the San Antonio – Austin area, and the Matagorda offshore production area. El Paso has also reviewed a proposed draft of complaint (the “Proposed Complaint”) that the Commission contemplates issuing. The Proposed Consent Order is designed to remedy the likely competitive effects arising from the El Paso acquisition of all of the outstanding voting shares of PG&E Gas Transmission Teco, Inc., and PG&E Gas Transmission Texas Corporation, from PG&E (the “Acquisition”). II. Description of the Parties and the Proposed Acquisition El Paso Energy Corporation is an integrated energy company producing, transporting, gathering, processing, and treating natural gas. With over $21 billion in assets, El Paso Energy Corporation is one of the largest integrated natural gas-to-power companies in the world. El Paso Energy not only owns North America's largest natural gas pipeline system, but also has growing operations in merchant energy services, power generation, international project development, gas gathering and processing, and gas and oil production. El Paso has an interest in five pipeline systems in Texas: the Oasis pipeline, running from west Texas, through the San Antonio and Austin areas, to the Katy natural gas trading area (near Houston, Texas); the Channel Pipeline, extending from south Texas to the Houston Ship Channel; the Shoreline and Tomcat gathering systems, carrying gas from the Texas Gulf Coast to other larger transmission pipelines, and the Gulf States Pipeline, which runs from the Texas border to Ruston, Louisiana. -
2007 EPA Natural Gas STAR Program Accomplishments
EPA Natural Gas STAR Program Accomplishments Introduction stablished in 1993, the Natural Gas STAR Program is a flexible, voluntary partnership that encourages oil and natural gas companies—both domestically and internationally—to adopt proven, cost-effective technologies and practices that Eimprove operational efficiency and reduce methane emissions. Given that methane is the primary component of natural gas and is a potent greenhouse gas—23 times more powerful than carbon dioxide (CO2) in trapping heat in the atmosphere over a 100-year period—reducing these emissions can result in environmental, economic, and operational benefits. Natural Gas STAR industry partners have operations in all of the major industry sectors—production, gathering and processing, transmission, and distribution—and represent 60 percent of the natural gas industry in the United States, including 19 of the top 25 natural gas production companies. Also, with the launch of Natural Gas STAR International in 2006, the Program expanded to include companies world- wide, significantly increasing opportunities to reduce methane emissions from oil and natural gas operations. Today, the Program has more than 130 partner compa- nies and is endorsed by 20 major industry trade associations. This document highlights the methane emissions reductions Natural Gas STAR partners have achieved to date under this important voluntary partnership program. It also highlights a variety of technologies and practices implemented by partners to reduce methane emissions. The following diagram -
SHAPING the FUTURE “There Is an Energy Transition Occurring Across the Globe — and I Believe the 21St Century Will Be the Century of Energy.”
2019 | ANNUAL REPORT SHAPING THE FUTURE “ There is an energy transition occurring across the globe — and I believe the 21st century will be the Century of Energy.” — JEFFREY W. MARTIN Dear fellow shareholders: Together, we are shaping the future. This is an exciting We executed on that strategy by divesting certain time to be building new energy infrastructure in non-core assets and reinvesting sales proceeds into North America. our core markets: California, Texas and Mexico, and the liquefied natural gas (LNG) export market. After serving as a driver of change across so many industries throughout the past century, the global These markets enable us to focus on the delivery energy market has now reached an inflection point. of cleaner and more secure forms of energy to At Sempra Energy, we believe the energy industry consumers right here in North America as well as will experience significant disruption in the next abroad. Moreover, we are focusing our role in the 20 years. We view this as an opportunity. energy value chain on transmission and distribution investments that provide attractive risk-adjusted By delivering access to safer and more reliable, returns and higher value for our stakeholders. lower-carbon energy solutions, we have a unique opportunity to shape our company’s future. Our We have accomplished many of our goals and made employees are united around a vision to make a great progress in our journey to become North difference in the world by delivering energy with America’s premier energy infrastructure company. purpose, while supporting a high-performing corporate culture that serves all of our stakeholders. -
171 Ferc ¶ 61,243 United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
171 FERC ¶ 61,243 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Neil Chatterjee, Chairman; Richard Glick, Bernard L. McNamee, and James P. Danly. Betelgeuse Energy, LLC Docket No. RP20-521-000 v. El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. ORDER ON COMPLAINT (Issued June 18, 2020) On February 13, 2020, Betelgeuse Energy, LLC (Betelgeuse) filed a Complaint objecting to El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.’s (El Paso) rejection of Betelgeuse’s non-conforming bids in two open seasons for capacity under expiring contracts subject to a right of first refusal (ROFR).1 As discussed further below, we deny the Complaint. Background Betelgeuse states that it is a wholly owned subsidiary of Spica Energy Holdings, LLC, with its principal place of business in Gainesville, Florida. According to Betelgeuse, it is a newly established entity that was formed “to focus on the development 1 In Order No. 636, the Commission amended its regulations to permit pre-granted abandonment of transportation contracts but permitted customers taking service for one year or more at the maximum rate to continue to receive the historical service upon which they had relied by conditioning such pre-granted abandonment on a ROFR for the existing shipper. Pipeline Service Obligations and Revisions to Regulations Governing Self-Implementing Transportation; and Regulation of Natural Gas Pipelines After Partial Wellhead Decontrol, Order No. 636, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 30,939 (1992) (cross-referenced at 59 FERC ¶ 61,030); 18 C.F.R. § 284.221(d) (2019). A pipeline may also offer a ROFR to its customers separately on a non-discriminatory basis. -
SDG&E Gas Franchise
Caroline \\ 1inn Chief Ex~cutive OAicer P.O. Bux I g9$S I Sau Diego, A fJ'l 112 ) Tel: ( r, ) Ci50-61~5 A ~ Sempra Energy utilit/' [email protected] Hand Delivered April 16, 2021 Purchasing & Contracting Department Civic Center Plaza 1200 Third Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, California, 92101 (619) 236-5921 Re: SDG&E RESPONSETO INVITATION TO BID FOR A FRANCHISETO CONSTRUCT,MAINTAIN AND USE PIPESAND APPURTENANCESFOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTINGGAS IN THE STREETSOF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO SDG&E BID DETAILS BEGIN ON PAGE 3 OF THIS DOCUMENT Dear Purchasing & Contracting Department, Mayor Gloria, and Honorable Members of the City Council, San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E") is pleased to submit this responsive bid for a franchise to construct, maintain and use pipes and appurtenances for transmitting and distributing gas in the streets of the City of San Diego ("SDG&E Gas Franchise Bid"). We take this opportunity to thank the City of San Diego for its efforts to make this Invitation to Bid ("ITB") an open process, which has invited discussion on key terms in the 1TBand has engaged interested community stakeholders through an expansive community forum, survey, and outreach process in January and February 2021. As the Mayor's office announced, over 1,300 community organizations and leaders, city residents, employees, and elected officials had their voices heard before this solicitation was released. We are committed to participating in this process and look forward to an opportunity to discuss the details of our bid and the terms of the Gas Franchise in person. -
Natural Gas Issues in California
FYI: Natural Gas Issues in California April 2001 Limits in pipeline and storage capacity threaten to impose an effective ceiling on the amount of natural gas that can get into California, which relies heavily on imported supplies of this energy source to fuel the creation of electricity. Deliberate market manipulation also has been accused of squeezing supplies in the face of rising demand. This paper explores reasons for the wave of price jumps and outlines issues that hinge on the capacity of thousands of miles of pipeline to transport crucial supplies. It also notes other factors, such as patterns in well-drilling, that have played a role in shaping today’s natural gas market. Regional impacts created by these chains of events also are highlighted. We conclude the paper with a series of policy options for addressing these issues. Methods of Delivery and the Rising Use of Natural Gas The way natural gas is delivered to a customer depends on the size of the customer. The largest users of natural gas, called non-core customers by the industry, make their purchases directly from suppliers, marketers and brokers. Some non-core customers take deliveries directly from high-pressure interstate pipelines, bypassing the utility companies that supply other users. Smaller customers – whether residential, commercial, or small industrial users – have the option of procuring natural gas from the utility companies that serve their areas or from suppliers, marketers or brokers. These customers are the core users. Three large and two small investor-owned natural gas utilities do business in California. The big three are Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas) and San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E). -
Gas Debit/Credit Calculations for Fy 2013
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER GAS DEBIT/CREDIT CALCULATIONS FOR FY 2013 Act Program Cost: 59,361,000 Adj Tot Dtherms: 41,925,103,355 Adj Chg Factor: 0.0014158820 Original Adjusted Company Annual Annual 2013 Company Name Total Charge Charge Debit/Credit Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC (310) 598,453,571 854,467 847,340 -7,127 Alliance Pipeline L.P. (493) 653,476,488 933,028 925,246 -7,782 American Midstream (AlaTenn) LLC (199) 16,875,224 24,094 23,893 -201 American Midstream (Midla) LLC (12451) 44,515,010 63,558 63,028 -530 ANR Pipeline Company (12442) 1,522,401,449 2,173,672 2,155,541 -18,131 ANR Storage Company (36155) 14,861,983 21,220 21,043 -177 Arlington Storage Company, LLC (604) 28,843,723 41,183 40,839 -344 Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C. (1332) 28,358,133 40,489 40,152 -337 Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC (002443) 34,577,588 49,370 48,958 -412 Bison Pipeline LLC (302) 12,527,770 17,887 17,738 -149 Black Marlin Pipeline Company (1772) 7,508,118 10,720 10,631 -89 Blue Lake Gas Storage Company (1901) 20,868,502 29,796 29,547 -249 Bluewater Gas Storage, LLC (001154) 45,867,865 65,490 64,943 -547 Boardwalk Storage Company, LLC (14444) 9,048,660 12,920 12,812 -108 Bobcat Gas Storage (11144) 37,108,701 52,983 52,542 -441 Caledonia Energy Partners, L.L.C. (726) 5,501,232 7,855 7,789 -66 Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC (740) 4,357,002 6,221 6,169 -52 Carolina Gas Transmission Corporation (187) 121,925,357 174,084 172,632 -1,452 Centra Pipelines Minnesota Inc. -
SDG&E Electric Franchise
Caroline "'inu Chief Executive Oflicer P.O. Box 1,wss l San Diego, CA 9~ 11'.1 P. Td: ( . .58) (i50-61, .'i A ~ Sempra Energy utility® C\-Vi1111U.l.1sdve.eo111 Hand Delivered April 16, 2021 Purchasing & Contracting Department Civic Center Plaza 1200 Third Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, California, 92101 (619) 236-5921 Re: SDG&E RESPONSETO INVITATION TO BID FORA FRANCHISETO CONSTRUCT,MAINTAIN AND USE POLES,WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCESFOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTINGELECTRICITY IN THE STREETSOF THE CITYOF SAN DIEGO SDG&E BID DETAILS BEGIN ON PAGE 3 OF THIS DOCUMENT Dear Purchasing & Contracting Department, Mayor Gloria, and Honorable Members of the City Council, San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E") is pleased to submit this responsive bid for a franchise to construct, maintain and use poles, wires, conduits, and appurtenances for transmitting and distributing electricity in the streets of the City of San Diego ("SDG&E Electric Franchise Bid"). We take this opportunity to thank the City of San Diego for its efforts to make this Invitation to Bid {"ITB") an open process, which has invited discussion on key terms in the 1TBand has engaged interested community stakeholders through an expansive community forum, survey, and outreach process in January and February 2021. As the Mayor's office announced, over 1,300 community organizations and leaders, city residents, employees, and elected officials had their voices heard before this solicitation was released. We are committed to participating in this process and look forward to an opportunity to discuss the details of our bid and the terms of the Electric Franchise in person. -
1 United States of America Before The
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Mesquite Solar 2, LLC ) Docket No. ER16-_____-000 PETITION OF MESQUITE SOLAR 2, LLC FOR ORDER ACCEPTING MARKET-BASED RATE TARIFF FOR FILING AND GRANTING WAIVERS AND BLANKET APPROVALS AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED ACTION Pursuant to section 205 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),1 Rule 205 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission),2 and Part 35 of the Commission’s regulations under the FPA,3 Mesquite Solar 2, LLC (Applicant) hereby petitions the Commission for: (1) acceptance of its Market-Based Rate Tariff with an effective date of May 20, 2016; (2) waiver of certain Commission regulations under the FPA; and (3) the granting of certain blanket approvals. As described herein, Applicant respectfully requests issuance of an order granting the above requests no later than May 20, 2016. As discussed in Section IV of this application, Applicant also requests a blanket authorization under FPA § 204 and Part 34 of the Commission’s regulations to issue securities and assume liabilities. Applicant requests that the Commission issue a notice concerning the request for such blanket authorization under FPA § 204 and Part 34 of the Commission’s regulations at the same time, and with the same comment period, as that issued for the notice of 1 16 U.S.C. § 824d. 2 18 C.F.R. § 385.205. 3 18 C.F.R. Part 35. 1 Applicant’s FPA § 205 application for market-based rate authorization.4 Applicant further requests that the Commission grant its request for blanket authorization to issue securities and assume liabilities (without imposing any additional notice period) in the same order and at the same time it issues the order granting Applicant’s market-based rate authority so that such blanket authorization will be fully effective at the time of the order.5 I. -
Sempra Energy Completes $2.5 Billion Divestiture of US Renewables and Non-Utility Natural Gas Storage Assets
Sempra Energy Completes $2.5 Billion Divestiture Of US Renewables And Non-Utility Natural Gas Storage Assets April 22, 2019 SAN DIEGO, April 22, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Sempra Energy (NYSE: SRE), today announced that it has completed the divestiture of its U.S. renewables business and non-utility natural gas storage assets, generating approximately $2.5 billion in total cash proceeds. The announcement comes with today's completion of the sale of its remaining ownership interests in operating and development-stage wind assets to American Electric Power Company, Inc. (NYSE: AEP) for $584 million in cash, subject to customary post-closing adjustments. "We have a long and successful track record of actively managing our portfolio, including exiting businesses that are no longer consistent with our strategy," said Joseph A. Householder, president and chief operating officer of Sempra Energy. "The proceeds from the asset sales will be used to pay down debt and redeploy capital to support the strategic growth of Sempra Energy in North America." The sale to AEP included approximately 724 megawatts of net operating capacity comprising the following projects: Black Oak Getty Wind in Minnesota and Apple Blossom Wind in Michigan, as well as Sempra Energy's interests in jointly-owned projects with BP Wind Energy: Auwahi Wind in Hawaii (wind and battery storage), Flat Ridge 2 Wind in Kansas, Mehoopany Wind in Pennsylvania, Cedar Creek 2 Wind in Colorado, and Fowler Ridge 2 Wind in Indiana. AEP also acquired all of Sempra Energy's wind projects currently in development. In February, Sempra Energy completed the sale of its non-utility U.S. -
SDG&E Joins Settlement with Duke Energy
SDG&E joins settlement with Duke Energy SAN DIEGO, July 13, 2004 - San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) joined with other California parties today in announcing that they have reached a settlement with Duke Energy Corp. and some of its affiliates that will provide refunds concerning Duke's energy charges during the California energy crisis of 2000-01. The settlement resolves claims against Duke made by California's investor-owned electric utilities, the California Electricity Oversight Board, the California Department of Water Resources Electric Power Fund and the California attorney general. The attorneys general of Oregon and Washington also are participating in the settlement, as are a number of local California governments. "We are pleased that we have been able to resolve this issue, dating back to the beginning of the California energy crisis," said William L. Reed, senior vice president of regulatory and strategic planning at SDG&E. Reed noted that SDG&E had made the initial filing at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requesting relief from soaring energy prices in August 2000. The settlement calls for Duke to assign to the settling parties about $140 million in receivables owed to Duke for transactions during the period of the energy crisis. Duke also will contribute approximately $60 million in cash for a total settlement of more than $200 million. The cash payment includes $2.5 million that Duke previously paid in an earlier settlement negotiated with the FERC. SDG&E estimated that its customers' share of the settlement proceeds will be approximately $14 million. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) will determine how the refund will be distributed to customers. -
USV El Paso Natrual Gas Company
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NUMBER 1.95CV00067 Plaintiff, JUDGE: Harold H. Greene v. DECK TYPE: Antitrust EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY, DATE STAMP: 01/12/95 Defendant. COMPLAINT The United States of America, through its attorneys, acting under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, brings this civil action to obtain equitable and other relief against the defendant named herein and alleges as follows: I. NATURE OF THIS ACTION 1. The United States brings this civil antitrust action to obtain injunctive relief against an anticompetitive tying arrangement of the defendant El Paso Natural Gas Company ("El Paso") that violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. 2 . El Paso owns and operates a natural gas gathering system located in the San Juan Basin of the United States, which it uses to transport natural gas produced in the basin to points of connection with mainline interstate pipelines. El Paso's San Juan gathering system has market power for gas gathering for wells in the San Juan Basin. Many San Juan Basin producers have no alternative to El Paso for gas gathering. El Paso requires persons operating gas wells in the San Juan Basin to purchase meter installation service from it as a condition of connecting a well or wells to its gathering system. 3. El Paso's practice of tying meter installation to its gas gathering service has caused many well operators seeking to connect a well to El Paso's gathering system to purchase meter installation service at a cost higher than they otherwise would have paid, to wait longer for installation than otherwise necessary, or both.