DOCSLIB.ORG

Unravelling an American Dilemma:The Demonization Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unravelling an American Dilemma:The Demonization Of UNRAVELING AN AMERICAN DILEMMA: THE DEMONIZATION OF MARIHUANA A Masters Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Pepperdine University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts By John Craig Lupien April, 1995 Acknowledgments First and foremost I would like to express my unbounded gratitude to my parents, Brooks H. Lupien and Celia R. Lupien, who have allowed me the opportunity to complete this project. Without their love and support I would not have been able to finish this thesis. Special thanks to my parents’ dear friend, Raymond Gagné, who helped me focus my thoughts and produce the paper before you. For his patience and timely advice, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. John McClung. Likewise, for his patience and belief in my abilities, I would like to thank Dr. Paul Randolph. Thank you to all the wonderful women at the DEA who helped me during my brief hiatus in Washington, DC. For understanding and friendship thanks to everyone at the Westchester County Records and Archives Center. And last but not least thanks to the Tortolanis and Amelios for extending their gracious hospitality to me in New York. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ii Table of Contents • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • iii Introduction: Hidden Motives • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Chapter 1: An Old Path to a New Frontier • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Chapter 2: The Evolution of the Marihuana Issue in America • • • • • • 42 Chapter 3: The Final Assault • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 63 Chapter 4: The Immediate Repercussions of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 101 Conclusion: The Aftermath of the Prohibition of Marihuana • • • • • • 136 Bibliography • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 151 About the Author • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 160 Abstract of Masters Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Division of Humanities of Pepperdine University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts UNRAVELING AN AMERICAN DILEMMA: THE DEMONIZATION OF MARIHUANA By John Craig Lupien April, 1995 Chair: John McClung, Ph. D. The primary goal of this thesis is to reveal a new perspective with regard to the dilemma of the prohibition of marihuana. In particular, the subject matter delves into the specific history of the hemp industry of the 1930s. According to this author’s research, the circumstances surrounding the evolution of the marihuana issue in the United States were directly effected by certain developments in the hemp and wood pulp industries of the 1930s. Aspects of this thesis are not entirely original and the author is indebted to the efforts of previous researchers. However, the main arguments of this thesis have been based upon original material. Chair: _________________________ Members:___________________________ ___________________________ Introduction Hidden Motives Since the dawn of civilization, people have cultivated the plant known scientifically as cannabis and agriculturally as hemp for its fiber, seed, and pharmaceutical properties. Throughout the world, the records of archaeology and history reveal that humanity universally recognized the benefits of this unique plant. Such recognition ended abruptly in 1930, when the newly created Federal Bureau of Narcotics began to educate the American public about marihuana, as hemp had been known colloquially in the Sonoran region of Mexico.1[1] Between 1930 and 1934, the Bureau compiled a body of misinformation which suggested that the use of marihuana was directly linked to crime, induced violent behavior, and caused insanity. Then, suddenly, in 1935, the Bureau flooded the nation with educational propaganda against marihuana use. During this act of demonization, the Bureau continuously cited its own accumulated body of misinformation as a precedent for legislation on the federal level. Through this 1[1]Jack Herer, The Emperor Wears No Clothes (Van Nuys, California: HEMP Publishing, 1991) p. 25. Herer also explains that “marihuana” is the Americanized spelling. The correct spelling is “marijuana.” To avoid confusion, the spelling which will be used throughout this paper, will be the Americanized version, “marihuana.” The use of “h” appears in the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 and the records of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. Also see the Oxford English Dictionary listing for “marijuana, marihuana.” studied deception, the Bureau effectively lobbied for the passage of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, which considerably restricted the usage, distribution, and production of marihuana. Significantly, restrictions on marihuana automatically implied restrictions on the cultivation of hemp.2[2] Several highly suspicious circumstances surround the Federal Bureau of Narcotics’ demonization of marihuana in the 1930s. First, there never was a marihuana problem; this manufactured malady was a great media spoof. Secondly, the misinformation, which was disseminated to the public by the Bureau, was based on conjecture and hearsay; the objective truth and the scientific method were summarily discarded. Furthermore, the Bureau even suppressed and ignored information which was unbiased, objective, and contradicted its own special brand of demonization. The whole scenario of the Bureau’s “marihuana education” program is an amazing example of how 2[2]Richard J. Bonnie and Charles H. Whitebread II, The Marihuana Conviction: A History of Marihuana Prohibition in the United States (Charlottesville, Virginia: University of Virginia Press, 1974) pp. 93-126; Ernest L. Abel, Marihuana: The First Twelve Thousand Years (New York: Plenum Press, 1980) pp. 237-247; David F. Musto, The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987) Chapter 9, “Marihuana and the FBN;” Jack Herer, Hemp & The Marijuana Conspiracy: The Emperor Wears No Clothes (Van Nuys, California: HEMP Publishing, 1991) pp. 15-30; Jack Frazier, The Great American Hemp Industry (Peterstown, West Virginia: Solar Age Press, 1991) pp. 40-71; Chris Conrad, HEMP: Lifeline to the Future (Los Angeles, California: Creative Xpressions Publications, 1993) pp. 38-55; Michael Schaller, “The Federal Prohibition of Marihuana” Journal of Social History 4, no. 1 (1970): 61-74. National Archives: Washington National Research Center, Suitland, Md, Record Group 170, Accession Number: W 170-74-0005 (boxes 1-5), “Marihuana Tax Act of 1937” [Hereafter cited as “Marihuana Tax Act of 1937,” National Archives]. easily the American public could be deceived by a slick propaganda campaign. In retrospect, this trail of deceitful acts raises the possibility that the Bureau’s decision to demonize marihuana may have been prompted by hidden motives. 3[3] By strange coincidence the final assault of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics on marihuana occurred simultaneously with its own awareness of the emergence of a new hemp industry in America in 1935. This new hemp industry was based on the commercial practicability of producing raw cellulose pulp from hemp for the manufacture of paper. The Bureau seems to have demonized marihuana for motives that went far beyond its mandate to legally regulate the production and distribution of the drug. Specifically, the Bureau provided the perfect vehicle for vested interests who wanted to terminate the movement to develop a hemp-based paper industry. Marihuana was demonized by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics in the 1930s because of the hemp plant’s promising economic future.4[4] This hypothesis, that the demonization of marihuana was a result of the hemp plant’s economic potential, is not entirely original. In large part it is based on the observations of previous researchers. Their insights into why the Federal Bureau of Narcotics demonized marihuana in the 1930s are particularly relevant to this hypothesis. Because of this relevancy, it is necessary to briefly introduce the basic arguments of these 3[3]The set of conclusions which have been presented in this paragraph will be developed and thoroughly explained in Chapter 2: “The Evolution of the Marihuana Issue in America;” and Chapter 3: “The Final Assualt.” 4[4]Herer, The Emperor, pp. 15-30; Frazier, Great American Hemp Industry, pp. 40- 71; Conrad, HEMP, pp. 38-55; “Marihuana Tax Act of 1937,” National Archives. previous researchers. The arguments may be easily separated into two sets of explanations. The first explanation was provided by the decriminalization movement, which started in the late 1960s.5[5] According to decriminalization scholars, the prohibition of marihuana should be understood as an unfortunate result of the ideological climate of the day. Typically, modern historians use the term Progressive to describe the ideological climate of the early twentieth century. This period of time was characterized by strong convictions favoring the ideals of Calvinistic Protestantism, Scientific Materialism, and Uninhibited Capitalism. Aspects of these three philosophies were blended in America and became manifest in Progressivism, the ideology of the predominantly WASP upper- and middle-classes.6[6] 5[5]The following books are the foundation of the decriminalization movement: Richard J. Bonnie and Charles H. Whitebread II, The Marihuana Conviction: A History of Marihuana Prohibition in the United States (Charlottesville, Virginia: University of Virginia Press, 1974). Ernest L. Abel, Marihuana: The First Twelve Thousand Years (New York: Plenum Press, 1980). David
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hemp Fibers for Production of Speciality Paper and Board Grades
    Hemp fibers for production of speciality paper and board grades Janja Zule, Marjeta Černič, Matej Šuštaršič Bled, November 22, 2012 Papermaking fibers Origin • Softwood - spruce, fir, pine • Hardwood - eucalyptus, aspen, birch • Annual plants – hemp, flax, kenaf, bagasse, cotton, straw Properties • morphological • chemical • physical, mechanical • optical HEMP fibers in papermaking • the oldest surviving piece of paper from hemp – China (140 – 87 B.C.) • the first European papermaking in the 16th century • until the 19th century - rags (hemp and flax fibers) • growing need for paper - rag supply insufficient • exploitation of wood – abundant and cheap • today, only about 5 % of world s paper is made from annual plants (hemp, flax,…) HEMP fibers in papermaking • renewed interest in hemp – environmental reasons • excessive deforestation (TREES - oxygen supply, CO2 removal, natural balance) • 1 t of PAPER – 3 t of WOOD - up to 17 TREES • HEMP has about 4 times higher yield / hectare compared to TREES (20 years) • TREES need 50-100 years to grow, HEMP can be cutivated in 100 days HEMP fibers in papermaking Hemp bast Hemp core cellulose 70 % 35 % hemicellulose 15 % 35 % lignin 5 % 23 % length, mm 5 - 40 0,5 diameter, µm 25 - 50 22 thickness, µm 10 - 25 1,4 HEMP fibers in papermaking hemp bast hemp core long fibers short fibers HEMP fibers – charactesristics WOOD HEMP cellulose 40 – 50 % 70 % hemicellulose 25 – 35 % 15 % lignin 25 – 35 % 5 % Fibers SW HW length, mm 3 - 6 (0,5 - 1,8) 5 - 40 diameter, µm 25 - 45 (10 - 36) 25 - 50 thickness, µm
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais Alexandra Lauren Corrêa
    1 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Alexandra Lauren Corrêa Gabbard The Demonization of the Jew in Chaucer's “The Prioress's Tale,” Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice and Scott's Ivanhoe Belo Horizonte 2011 2 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Alexandra Lauren Corrêa Gabbard The Demonization of the Jew in Chaucer's “The Prioress's Tale,” Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice and Scott's Ivanhoe Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada à Faculdade de Letras da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, como requisito para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Letras: Estudos Literários. Orientador: Thomas LaBorie Burns Belo Horizonte 2011 3 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the issue of anti-Semitism throughout three different eras in chosen classics of the English literature- “The Prioress’s Tale” from the Canterbury Tales, The Merchant of Venice and Ivanhoe- comparing and contrasting the demonization of the Jewish characters present in the texts. By examining the three texts, I intend to show the evolution of the demonization of Jews in literature throughout different periods in history. The historical and cultural aspects of the works will be taken into consideration, for anti- Semitism can be clearly traced as an ideology built throughout Western culture as a form of domination and exclusion of minorities. The Lateran Council of 1215 resurrected the spectrum of anti-Semitism by imposing laws such as the prohibition of intermarriage between Jews and Christians or the obligation of different dress for Jews. This is especially visible in the chosen works, for Jews are stigmatized as demonic, pagan, heretic and unclean. A particular trope present in two of the texts in the Christian aversion to usury- a task that was conveniently attributed to the Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemp (Cannabis) Overview
    More than a drug Hemp as a natural resource and its use for society Hemp (Cannabis) Overview Introduction People in many cultures have prejudices against hemp because of its sources of drugs. But Cannabis is more than a drug. It is a useful renewable resource for an ecological way of living, and in a sustainability-based society, hemp would play a more important role than it does today. Biology Cannabis indica (Latin: of India) → psychoactive substances Cannabis ruderalis (Latin: weedy) → wild and not domesticated Cannabis sativa (Latin: cultivated) → industrial hemp for fibre and seed production → all products shown here Cannabis (hemp) belongs – together with Humulus (hops) and Celtis (hackberry) – to the familiy of Canna- binaceae. Uses for the Cannabis Plant Hemp can be used in 25,000 different products, from clothing to food to toiletries. Building Materials Figure 1: Cannabis sativa Paper (1) (2) Printing paper Insulation THC/CBD Food (6) Fine/Specialty paper Caulking (5) Filter paper Fiberboard Salad or Cooking Oil Newsprint Fiberglass substitute Medicine Supplements Cardboard/Packaging Cement Recreation Chocolate Stucco and mortar Cereal, Dessert, Drinks Hemp Nut Body Care Bast Hurd Leaves Flowers (7) Fibre (pulp) Soap Shampoo Hemp Oil Hand Cream Cosmetics Industrial Consumer Textiles Textiles Stalk Seed (3) (4) Technical Products (8) Rope Apparel Canvas Denim Seed Cake Oil paints Twine Bags Varnishes Fabrics Socks Printing inks Nets Diapers Light green (whole plant) Diesel Fuel Tarps Shoes = Boiler fuel Animal feed Lubricants Carpets On display Pyrolysis feedstock Protein-rich fiber Coatings ☼ David Grothe ☼ Final Project ☼ More than a drug Hemp as a natural resource and its use for society Agriculture Cultivation Hemp is usually planted between March and May in the northern hemisphere, be- tween September and November in the southern hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds an End to Antisemitism!
    Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds An End to Antisemitism! Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman Volume 5 Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman ISBN 978-3-11-058243-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067196-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067203-9 DOI https://10.1515/9783110671964 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2021931477 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, Lawrence H. Schiffman, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com Cover image: Illustration by Tayler Culligan (https://dribbble.com/taylerculligan). With friendly permission of Chicago Booth Review. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com TableofContents Preface and Acknowledgements IX LisaJacobs, Armin Lange, and Kerstin Mayerhofer Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds: Introduction 1 Confronting Antisemitism through Critical Reflection/Approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Hemp in the United States: Status and Market Potential
    Industrial Hemp in the United States: Status and Market Potential Abstract Industrial hemp has been the focus of official interest in several States. However, hemp and marijuana are different varieties of Cannabis sativa, which is classified as a con- trolled substance in the United States. With Canada now allowing hemp production, questions have been raised about the demand for hemp products. U.S. markets for hemp fiber (specialty textiles, paper, and composites) and seed (in food or crushed for oil) are, and will likely remain, small, thin markets. Uncertainty about longrun demand for hemp products and the potential for oversupply discounts the prospects for hemp as an eco- nomically viable alternative crop for American farmers. Keywords: industrial hemp, markets, bast fiber, hurds, seed, oil. The use of commercial or trade names does not imply approval or constitute endorse- ment by USDA. Washington, DC January 2000 Contents Executive Summary . .iv Introduction . .1 Identification: Industrial Hemp or Marijuana? . .2 History . .3 Industrial Hemp in Canada . .3 Plant Characteristics and Growing Requirements . .4 Harvesting, Retting, and Fiber Separation . .5 Harvesting . .5 Retting . .5 Fiber Separation . .5 U.S. Hemp Fiber and Fabric Imports . .9 Fiber Markets . .10 Specialty Textiles . .10 Paper and Composites . .13 Other Potential Uses . .13 Hemp Hurds . .14 Seed Markets . .15 Potential U.S. Production and Processing . .17 Possible Yields . .17 Processing . .17 Estimated Costs and Returns . .18 U.S. Experience With Kenaf and Flax . .23 State Study Findings . .24 Conclusions . .25 References . .27 Appendix I: Health Canada—Commercial Production of Industrial Hemp . .29 Appendix II: Oversupply of Small, Thin Markets .
    [Show full text]
  • “The Devil Made Me Do It” the Deification of Consciousness and the Demonization of the Unconscious
    CHAPTER 5 “The Devil Made Me Do It” The Deification of Consciousness and the Demonization of the Unconscious John A. Bargh Other chapters in this book on the social psychology of good and evil address important questions such as: What are the psychologi- cal processes that lead to positive, selfless, prosocial, and constructive behavior on the one hand or to negative, selfish, antisocial, and destruc- tive behavior on the other? Such questions concern how the state of a per- son’s mind and his or her current context or situation influences his or her actions upon the outside world. In this chapter, however, the causal direc- tion is reversed. The focus is instead on how the outside world of human beings—with its religious, medical, cultural, philosophical, and scientific traditions, its millennia-old ideologies and historical forces—has placed a value on types of psychological processes. It is on how these historical forces, even today, slant the field of psychological science, through basi- cally a background frame or mind set of implicit assumptions, to consider types of psychological processes themselves as being either good or evil (or at least problematic and producing negative outcomes). There exists a long historical tendency to consider one type of mental process to be the “good” one—our conscious and intentional, deliberate thought and behavior processes—and another type as the “bad” and even “evil” one—our automatic, impulsive, unintentional, and unconscious 69 Miller_Book.indb 69 12/8/2015 9:46:24 AM 70 CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVES ON GOOD AND EVIL FIGURE 5.1. Satan tempting John Wilkes Booth to the murder of President Abra- ham Lincoln (1865 lithograph by John L.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications for Industrial Hemp
    Applications for Industrial Hemp Half Moon Seminars October 18, 2019 Lombard, IL Phillip Alberti, Extension Educator Commercial Agriculture NW IL Phillip Alberti- [email protected] or 815-599-3644 or @NorthernILCrops What Does Hemp Look Like to You? Talking Points • Brief History • Medicinal Uses • Paper • Textiles • Biodegradable Plastics • Construction Materials • Fuel • Food Image Credit: Aaron Cadena Bryan Parr David Williams Steve Tomlins Industrial Hemp • Cannabis sativa • Hemp vs Marijuana • Dicotyledonous Plant • Primarily Dioecious • Hemp is Photoperiod Dependent • Short-Day • 10-12 hours darkness Image Credit: Aaron Cadena Slide Credit: Sean Murphy Slide Credit: Sean Murphy Slide Credit: Sean Murphy CBD Hemp (Specialty Crop) • Planting Stock: Transplants • Planting Method: Transplanter • Planting Rate: 1000- 2000 plants/acre • Harvest Method: Hand • Post Harvest: Plants are hung to dry in drying sheds or warehouse CBD Hemp Production Cannabinoids • Cannabis hemp contains at least 85 types of cannabinoids • Bind to receptor sites throughout our brain and body (65 cellular targets) • Different cannabinoids have different effects depending on the receptors they bind to Image Credit: SatiMed USA Cannabinoids Cannabinoids Cannabinoids • May help treat symptoms of many medical conditions • Mood/Eating/GI disorders • Neurological disorders • Pain/Sleep disorders • Different cannabis varieties produce different ratios of cannabinoids • Pretreatment with CBD significantly reduced anxiety, cognitive impairment and discomfort in their
    [Show full text]
  • HEMP VS. MARIJUANA: the FEDERAL BATTLE to CONTROL the MEANING of CANNABIS Carrie Lynn Torrella Submitted to the Faculty of the U
    HEMP VS. MARIJUANA: THE FEDERAL BATTLE TO CONTROL THE MEANING OF CANNABIS Carrie Lynn Torrella Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History, Indiana University December 2011 Accepted by the Faculty of Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. ________________________________ Michael David Snodgrass, Ph.D., Chair Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________ Robert G. Barrows, Ph.D. ______________________________ Nancy Marie Robertson, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my thanks to all the people who helped me complete this project. The staff at both the Advertising Council Archives at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the Harry J. Anslinger Papers at Penn State Special Collections Library assisted my research. My thesis committee members, Dr. Nancy Robertson and Dr. Robert Barrows, offered me valuable insight and suggestions for improvements. My thesis chair, Dr. Michael Snodgrass, has patiently read chapter drafts and given me thoughtful comments and suggestions. My parents, Marlene and Renè Torrella, have given me unconditional love and limitless support and prodded me to complete this project. I would also like to thank my sisters Tracy and Abigail, my brother Andrew and my dear friends Jesica, Anne, Veda, and Will for their support. Most of all, I would like to thank my daughters Claudia and Natasha for giving me the motivation
    [Show full text]
  • CBD: Weeding Through the Controversy
    ATrain Education, Inc CBD: Weeding Through the Controversy Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons. CBD: Weeding Through the Controversy Author: Tracey Long, RN, PhD, APRN Contact hours: 1.5 Course price: $10 Course Summary This course explains the medicinal use of cannabis, in the forms of CBD. It introduces the endocannabinoid system, addresses the legal issues, outlines therapeutic indications, and examines the claims of various products. Course Objectives Upon completion of this course you will be able to: 1. Explain 3 differences between CBD, marijuana, and cannabis. 2. Relate 4 unique features of the cannabis plant. 3. State 5 therapeutic uses for cannabis. 4. Discuss 3 common routes of administration of cannabis. 5. Describe elements of patient and family education regarding CBD. Criteria for Successful Completion 80% or higher on the post test, a completed evaluation form, and payment where required. No partial credit will be awarded. COI Support Accredited status does not imply endorsement by ATrain Education or other accrediting agency of any products discussed or displayed in this course. The planners and authors of this course have declared no conflict of interest and all information is provided fairly and without bias. Commercial Support No commercial support was received for this activity. ATrain Education, Inc CBD: Weeding Through the Controversy Instructions for Mail Order Once you’ve finished studying the course material: 1. Record your test answers on the answer sheet. 2. Complete the course evaluation. 3. Complete your registration and payment*. Mail the completed forms with your payment to: ATrain Education, Inc 5171 Ridgewood Rd Willits, CA 95490 *Check or money order payable to ATrain Education, Inc (or enter your credit card information on the registration form).
    [Show full text]
  • An Attempt to Legalize Hemp Farming in Tennessee Is Getting Pushback, Despite Its Economic Potential
    TENNESSEE TITANS Deja vu all over again Neil O’Donnell explains what Fitzpatrick faces taking over at QB. ENTER Murphy’sTAINMENT law: P17 Nashville Hoops over U2 From Elvis to The Boss, the MTSU venue has seen some DaviDson • Williamson • sUmnER • ChEatham • Wilson RUthERFoRD • R great acts. But that was then. Ledger Brian Patterson Photos / shutterstock.com P16 oBERtson • maURY • DiCkson • montGomERY | October 4 – 10, 2013 www.nashvilleledger.com The power of information. Vol. 39 | Issue 40 F oR mer lY WESTVIEW sinCE 1978 An attempt to legalize hemp Page 13 farming in Tennessee is getting pushback, despite Dec.: Dec.: Keith Turner, Ratliff, Jeanan Mills Stuart, Resp.: Kimberly Dawn Wallace, Atty: Mary C Lagrone, 08/24/2010, 10P1318 its economic potential In re: Jeanan Mills Stuart, Princess Angela Gates, Jeanan Mills Stuart, Princess Angela Gates,Dec.: Resp.: Kim Prince Patrick, Angelo Terry Patrick, Gates, Atty: Monica D Edwards, 08/25/2010, 10P1326 In re: Keith Turner, TN Dept Of Correction, www.westviewonline.com TN Dept Of Correction, Resp.: Johnny Moore,Dec.: Melinda Atty: Bryce L Tomlinson, Coatney, Resp.: Pltf(s): Rodney A Hall, Pltf Atty(s): n/a, 08/27/2010, 10P1336 In re: Kim Patrick, Terry Patrick, Pltf(s): Sandra Heavilon, Resp.: Jewell Tinnon, Atty: Ronald Andre Stewart, 08/24/2010,Dec.: Seton Corp 10P1322 Insurance Company, Dec.: Regions Bank, Resp.: Leigh A Collins, In re: Melinda L Tomlinson, Def(s): Jit Steel Transport Inc, National Fire Insurance Company, Elizabeth D Hale, Atty: William Warner McNeilly, 08/24/2010, Def Atty(s): J Brent Moore, 08/26/2010, 10C3316 10P1321 Dec.: Amy In Tennessee, the idea of hemp is hot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demonization of Judaism
    Klaus S. Davidowicz The Demonization of Judaism “Jew-hatred is the eldest social, cultural, religious and political prejudiceofhuman kind; Jew-hatred occurs in segregating and stigmatizingstereotypes, long beforediscrimination and bruteforce makethis resentment public, i.e. in passed down conceptions of the minor- ity by the majority,passed on uncriticallyfromgeneration to generation.”¹ Is there some continuity in antisemitism from Antiquitytothe Shoah up to the present,orare these rather separated periods because of the large local and his- torical differences?Inresearch on antisemitism,aline is drawnbetween the re- ligiously motivated Jew-hatred and the national and racist antisemitism that de- velopedinthe nineteenth century.Isthereacontinuous “history of anti‐Semitism” as described by Léon Poliakov in his four-volume book (1955– 1977) of the sametitle?² Shulamit Volkov put it aptlywhen she talked about the development of antisemitism as “continuity and discontinuity,”³ similar to the wayRaulHilbergshowed the connection between medieval Jew-hatred and National Socialist antisemitisminhis standard work TheDestruction of the European Jews (1961), but he alsodid not fail to point out the differences be- tween the two. Certainly,religion-basedanti-Judaism, racialantisemitism, and anti-Zionist antisemitism are forms of the same root—Jew-hatred, aphenomenon that can be encountered throughout the entire history of the Jews. Of course,there are large and importantdifferentiations between cultural and racist antisemitism, between primary and secondary antisemitism, just as there are surprising continuities with the phenomena of Jew-hatred. Certain antisemitic pictures from antiquity up to the present can be established that cre- ate new,often bizarre, bondsthat survive preposterous to reason. One of the cen- tral antisemitic perceptions is the alleged relation between Judaism and the devil, which will be shown here.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesse Ventura's Marijuana Manifesto
    JESSE VENTURA’S MARIJUANA MANIFESTO BY JESSE VENTURA WITH JEN HOBBS 2 Studies Cannabis kills tumor cells http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ articles/PMC1576089 pubmed/16818650 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/20090845 pubmed/17952650 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/616322 pubmed/20307616 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/14640910 pubmed/16616335 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/19480992 pubmed/16624285 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/15275820 pubmed/10700234 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/15638794 pubmed/17675107 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/14617682 pubmed/16893424 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/17342320 pubmed/15026328 3 Studies (continued) Uterine, testicular, and pancreatic cancers http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20925645 Brain cancer http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11479216 Mouth and throat cancer http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20516734 Breast cancer http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18454173 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16728591 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9653194 Lung cancer http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25069049 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22198381 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21097714 Prostate cancer http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
    [Show full text]