Mineral Deposits of Lake Valley Quadrangle, Grant, Luna, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mineral Deposits of Lake Valley Quadrangle, Grant, Luna, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico BULLETIN 37 Geology and Mineral Deposits of Lake Valley Quadrangle, Grant, Luna, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico BY HENRY L. JICHA, JR. Stratigraphy and structure of sedimentary and volcanic rocks and descriptions of mining districts 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ............ Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley .......................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts ........................................................... Albuquerque Holm O. Bursum, Jr. ................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ............................................................ Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ............................................................ Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz .............................................................................. Hobbs FRONTISPIECE VIEW OF LAKE VALLEY (circa 1905). TOWN OF LAKE VALLEY IN THE LAST DAYS OF THE SILVER BOOM. COMPARE WITH PLATE 2-A. Picture by Henry Schmidt, from the collection of Ray- mond Schmidt. Contents Page ABSTRACT ........................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 2 Geography and physiography ....................................................... 2 Nature of investigation ................................................................... 3 Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 3 Previous geologic work ....................................................................... 3 GEOLOGY .................................................................................. 4 The rocks ................................................................................... 6 Precambrian system .................................................................. 6 Cambro-Ordovician ................................................................ 6 Bliss sandstone .......................................................................................... 6 Ordovician system .......................................................................... 8 El Paso group .................................................................................... 8 Montoya group .................................................................... 11 Silurian system ................................................................................. 15 Fusselman limestone ..................................................................... 15 Devonian system ....................................................................... 15 Percha shale ........................................................................... 15 Mississippian system ........................................................................ 16 Caballero formation ........................................................... 16 Lake Valley formation ........................................................ 17 Kelly limestone .................................................................. 21 Pennsylvanian system ...................................................................... 21 Magdalena group ............................................................... 21 Permian (?) system ..................................................................... 24 Lobo formation ................................................................... 24 Cretaceous system ............................................................................ 26 Sarten sandstone ...................................................................... 26 Colorado shale ....................................................................... 27 Tertiary system ...................................................................... 27 Santa Fe (?) formation ................................................................... 28 Other sediments ................................................................. 30 Page Quaternary System ……………………………………………………….. 30 Pleistocene (?) gravels ............................................................. 30 Terrace gravels ................................................................ 30 Talus ............................................................................ 31 Bolson deposits and alluvium ................................................ 31 Summary ........................................................................... 31 Intrusive rocks ........................................................................... 37 Granodiorite porphyry ............................................................ 37 Tertiary volcanic rocks ........................................................ 38 Petrographic methods ................................................................. 38 Macho pyroxene andesites ........................................................ 39 Rubio Peak formation ......................................................... 40 Sugarlump tuffs ......................................................................... 42 Kneeling Nun rhyolite tuff .................................................. 44 Mimbres Peak formation ....................................................... 45 Pollack quartz latite ............................................................ 47 Razorback formation .......................................................... 47 Bear Springs basalt ................................................................... 48 Petrological notes .................................................................. 49 Dike rocks ............................................................................. 49 Structural geology ........................................................................ 54 Folds .............................................................................. 54 Faults ............................................................................. 54 Tectonic history .................................................................... 59 MINERAL DEPOSITS .................................................... 60 Cooks Peak and Jose mining districts ................................................. 60 Geologic relations ................................................................. 60 Character of the ores .................................................................... 60 Silicification ...................................................................... 62 Sources of the mineralizing solutions .......................................... 64 History and production ............................................................ 64 Future possibilities .................................................................. 65 Old Hadley (Graphic) mining district ......................................... 66 Occurrence .............................................................................. 67 Character of the ores .................................................................... 68 Page Lake Valley mining district .......................................................... 68 General geologic features of the district……..………………… 68 Nature and composition of the ores ............................................ 69 Nature, sequence, and source of mineralizing solutions ............ 70 Oxidation of the ores ............................................................. 70 History and Production……………………………………………..71 Future possibilities .................................................................. 74 Macho district .............................................................................. 74 Location and geologic setting .................................................... 74 Pattern of mineralization ........................................................... 75 Nature of the ores .................................................................... 77 Mine workings ................................................................ 79 History and production ............................................................ 79 Future possibilities .................................................................. 80 Victory claims ........................................................................... 80 Perlite deposits ..................................................................... 80 Regional features of mineralization .............................................. 81 Structural relations .............................................................. 81 Origin of the mineralizing solutions ......................................... 81 SUMMARY .......................................................................... 83 REFERENCES .................................................................... 84 APPENDIX ................................................................. 87 Explanation of the geologic sections accompanying the geologic map of Lake Valley quadrangle ................................................ 87 INDEX ............................................................................... 89 Illustrations Page TABLES 1. Generalized stratigraphic section of Lake Valley quadrangle . 4-5 2. Comparative thicknesses of the Lake Valley formation in various parts of Cooks Range and the Lake Valley area ......................... 19 3. Generalized
Recommended publications
  • Geology and Mineral Deposits of Lake Valley Quadrangle, Grant, Luna, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico
    BULLETIN 37 Geology and Mineral Deposits of Lake Valley Quadrangle, Grant, Luna, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico BY HENRY L. JICHA, JR. Stratigraphy and structure of sedimentary and volcanic rocks and descriptions of mining districts 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ............ Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley .......................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts ........................................................... Albuquerque Holm O. Bursum, Jr. ................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ............................................................ Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ............................................................ Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz .............................................................................. Hobbs FRONTISPIECE VIEW OF LAKE VALLEY (circa 1905). TOWN OF LAKE VALLEY IN THE LAST DAYS OF THE SILVER BOOM. COMPARE WITH PLATE 2-A. Picture by Henry Schmidt, from the collection of Ray- mond Schmidt. Contents Page ABSTRACT ........................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 2 Geography and physiography ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southward-Directed Subduction of the Farallon–Aluk Spreading Ridge and Its Impact on Subduction Mechanics and Andean Arc Magmatism: Insights From
    feart-08-00121 May 7, 2020 Time: 11:30 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 08 May 2020 doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.00121 Southward-Directed Subduction of the Farallon–Aluk Spreading Ridge and Its Impact on Subduction Mechanics and Andean Arc Magmatism: Insights From Edited by: Marina Manea, Geochemical and Seismic National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico Tomographic Data Reviewed by: 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,2 Luca Ferrari, Sofía B. Iannelli *, Lucía Fernández Paz , Vanesa D. Litvak , Guido Gianni , Geosciences Center, National Lucas M. Fennell1,2, Javiera González3, Friedrich Lucassen4, Simone Kasemann4, Autonomous University of Mexico, Verónica Oliveros3 and Andrés Folguera1,2 Mexico 1 2 Jiashun Hu, Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Instituto de Estudios 3 California Institute of Technology, Andinos ‘Don Pablo Groeber’, CONICET- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Departamento 4 United States de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile, MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences and Faculty of Geosciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany *Correspondence: Sofía B. Iannelli sofi[email protected] Since the initial proposal of the past existence of a southward-directed mid-ocean ridge–subduction interaction in the Andes during Late Cretaceous–Paleogene times, Specialty section: This article was submitted to several studies have been devoted to uncover the tectonomagmatic evidence of this Structural Geology and Tectonics, process. The collision of a spreading ridge against a subduction margin provokes a section of the journal important tectonomagmatic changes, including, between them, variations in arc-related Frontiers in Earth Science magmatic activity and in the plate-margin stress regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrography and Stratigraphy of Seville-Trident Exploration Wells Near Deming, New Mexico
    Petrographyandstratigraphy 0fSeville-Trident exploration wells near Deming,New Mexico byBusse// E. Clemons,Professor of geology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003 Abstract Methods Petrographicanalyses of cuttingsfrom four wildcatoil andgas exploration Well cuttings of varied intervalswere washed and scannedunder wellsdrilled by Seville-TridentCorp. near Deming, New Mexico,from 1981 a binocularmicroscope. The selectedintervals depended on the col- to 1983are reported. Thickness of upperTertiary-Quaternary basinfill south- lectionintervals available, types of lithologiespresent in the cuttings, eastof Demingis interpretedto be about4,000 ft. Basin-fillsediments overlie in lithologies.Eighty-five about5,000 ft of Miocene-Oligocenevolcaniclastic rocks and ash-flowtuffs. and bracketingdistinctive changes petro- TheMiocene-Oligocene rocks overlie up to 3,600ft of RubioPeak Formation (Eocene),which is intrudedby a fine-crystallinequartz monzonite The No. 2 City of Demingwell was drilled to a depth of 12,385ft and bottomedin o/ RubioPeak Formation. The o^ No. 1 McSherrywell wasdrilled to a depthof -1 tttl, 12,495ft, but cuttingsare available only to 12,430ft. About300 ft of probable 2r- PaleoceneLobo Formation is interpretedbeneath the RubioPeak Formation -A andabove about 570 ft of Precambrianmetamorphic rocks. The No. I Hurt z :: Hill Ranchwell, westof Deming,is reportedto have6een drilled to a totaldepth ,. t- of 7,723ft. About 2,300ft of basinfill, 4,800ft of Tertiaryvolcanic roiks intrudedby rhyolite of Red Mountain,and M0 ft of El Paio Dolomiteare \1, representedin the cuttings(deepest cuttings studied were from 7,640ft). Silve Introduction Seville-Trident Corp., of Carlsbad, California, drilled five wildcat oil and gas exploration wells in central Luna County from 198Lto 1983(Fig. 1.).All were completedas dry holes and no shows of oil Big Eurro j MrsMfs ,.='lr f+'$.X.{r,o.*'"""",-2/S.{fii| t,,i.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ordovician (Sardic) Felsic Magmatic Events in South-Western Europe: Underplating of Hot Mafic Magmas Linked to the Opening of the Rheic Ocean
    Solid Earth, 11, 2377–2409, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2377-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Comparative geochemical study on Furongian–earliest Ordovician (Toledanian) and Ordovician (Sardic) felsic magmatic events in south-western Europe: underplating of hot mafic magmas linked to the opening of the Rheic Ocean J. Javier Álvaro1, Teresa Sánchez-García2, Claudia Puddu3, Josep Maria Casas4, Alejandro Díez-Montes5, Montserrat Liesa6, and Giacomo Oggiano7 1Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC-UCM), Dr. Severo Ochoa 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain 2Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Ríos Rosas 23, 28003 Madrid, Spain 3Dpt. Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain 4Dpt. de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l’Oceà, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí Franquès s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 5Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Plaza de la Constitución 1, 37001 Salamanca, Spain 6Dpt. de Mineralogia, Petrologia i Geologia aplicada, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí Franquès s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 7Dipartimento di Scienze della Natura e del Territorio, 07100 Sassari, Italy Correspondence: J. Javier Álvaro ([email protected]) Received: 1 April 2020 – Discussion started: 20 April 2020 Revised: 14 October 2020 – Accepted: 19 October 2020 – Published: 11 December 2020 Abstract. A geochemical comparison of early Palaeo- neither metamorphism nor penetrative deformation; on the zoic felsic magmatic episodes throughout the south- contrary, their unconformities are associated with foliation- western European margin of Gondwana is made and in- free open folds subsequently affected by the Variscan defor- cludes (i) Furongian–Early Ordovician (Toledanian) activ- mation.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterarbeit
    MASTERARBEIT Titel der Masterarbeit Late Cretaceous Volcaniclastic Rocks in the Pontides (NW Turkey) verfasst von Katharina Böhm BSc angestrebter akademischer Grad Master of Science (M.Sc.) Wien, 2015 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 066 815 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Erdwissenschaften Betreuerin / Betreuer: Ao. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Michael Wagreich Declaration ”I hereby declare that this master’s thesis was authored by myself independently, without use of other sources than indicated. I have explicitly cited all material which has been quoted either literally or by content from the used sources. Further this work was neither submitted in Austria nor abroad for any degree or examination.” Contents Declaration2 1. Introduction8 1.1. Project.................................. 9 1.1.1. Goals............................... 9 1.2. Geographical setting.......................... 10 1.3. Geological setting............................ 12 1.3.1. The Pontides........................... 14 1.3.2. The Pontides in the Cretaceous................ 18 1.3.3. Correlation with relative ages.................. 24 2. Nomenclature 28 3. Methods 29 3.1. ICP-ES and ICP-MS........................... 29 3.2. PXRD.................................. 29 3.3. Heavy mineral extraction........................ 30 4. Results 31 4.1. Mineralogy................................ 31 4.1.1. Powder X-Ray diffraction.................... 31 4.1.2. Thin sections.......................... 33 4.1.3. Mineral Extraction: Dating of minerals............. 34 4.2. Geochemistry.............................. 36 5. Interpretation of the geochemical results 37 5.1. Mobility of elements........................... 37 5.2. Alteration of minerals.......................... 39 5.3. Determining the rock type........................ 41 3 5.4. Discriminating volcanic series..................... 48 5.5. Revealing the tectonic setting...................... 52 5.6. Plotting geochemical element patterns................. 60 5.7. Summary of the geochemical classification.............. 62 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cretaceous Igneous Rocks in Southeastern Guangxi and Their Implication for Tectonic Environment in Southwestern South China Block
    Open Geosciences 2020; 12: 518–531 Research Article Yang Liu, Nianqiao Fang*, Menglin Qiang, Lei Jia, and Chaojie Song The Cretaceous igneous rocks in southeastern Guangxi and their implication for tectonic environment in southwestern South China Block https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0160 Keywords: high-magnesian andesites 1, I-type granite 2, received January 9, 2020; accepted May 13, 2020 clastoporphyritic lava 3, Neo-Tethyan Subduction 4, Abstract: Southeastern Guangxi is located in the south- Southwestern South China Block 5 western South China Block and to the northwest of the South China Sea (SCS), with abundant records of the Cretaceous magmatism. A detailed study of igneous rocks will contribute to a better understanding of the late 1 Introduction Mesozoic tectonic environment. Zircon U–Pb dating yields ages of 93.37 ± 0.43 Ma for Yulin andesites and 107.6 ± South China Block lies between the Tethyan tectonic belt fi [ ] 1.2 Ma for Luchuan granites. Yulin andesites are hornblende and Paci c tectonic belt 1 .Itisacrucialperiodfor andesites, of which w(MgO) is between 7.72% and 8.42%, magmatic rocks and mineralization in southwestern South and Mg# is between 66.7 and 68.0, belonging to high China Block in Cretaceous, especially in the range of – [ ] magnesian andesites (HMAs) from peridotite sources. 100 90 Ma 2 . These magmatic rocks are a key to study Luchuan granites are medium- to fine-grained monzogra- the tectonic evolution in this region. More research has - nites. Monzogranites and clastoporphyritic lava are high-K been done by predecessors, including Kunlunguan bath calc-alkaline series and metaluminum to weakly peralumi- olith, Dali rock mass and Dachang dike group with nous series, which belong to the I-type granites.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest NM Publication List
    Southwest New Mexico Publication Inventory Draft Source of Document/Search Purchase Topic Category Keywords County Title Author Date Publication/Journal/Publisher Type of Document Method Price Geology 1 Geology geology, seismic Southwestern NM Six regionally extensive upper-crustal Ackermann, H.D., L.W. 1994 U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 94- Electronic file USGS publication search refraction profiles, seismic refraction profiles in Southwest New Pankratz, D.P. Klein 695 (DJVU) http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/ southwestern New Mexico ofr/ofr94695 Mexico, 2 Geology Geology, Southwestern NM Magmatism and metamorphism at 1.46 Ga in Amato, J.M., A.O. 2008 In New Mexico Geological Society Fall Field Paper in Book http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/g $45.00 magmatism, the Burro Mountains, southwestern New Boullion, and A.E. Conference Guidebook - 59, Geology of the Gila uidebooks/59/ metamorphism, Mexico Sanders Wilderness-Silver City area, 107-116. Burro Mountains, southwestern New Mexico 3 Geology Geology, mineral Catron County Geology and mineral resources of York Anderson, O.J. 1986 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Electronic file (PDF) NMBGMR search $10.00 for resources, York Ranch SE quadrangle, Cibola and Catron Resources Open File Report 220A, 22 pages. <http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publicatio CD Ranch, Fence Counties, New Mexico ns/openfile/details.cfml?Volume=2 Lake, Catron, 20A> Cibola 4 Geology Geology, Zuni Salt Catron County Geology of the Zuni Salt Lake 7 1/2 Minute Anderson, O.J. 1994 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and
    [Show full text]
  • Ammonoid Genus Argentiniceras from Kachchh (India) and Its Relevance to J Urassic/Cretaceous Boundary
    Newsl. Stratigr. Berlin · Stuttgart, 28. 3. 1991 Discovery of Lower Berriasian (Lower Creataceous) Ammonoid Genus Argentiniceras from Kachchh (India) and its Relevance to J urassic/Cretaceous Boundary by jAr KRISHNA with 1 plate, 2 figures and 4 tables Abstract. The ammonoid genus Argentiniceras SPATH 1924 (= Andesites GERTH 1925) is described and illustrated from Umia Member (Green Oolitic bed) North of Lakhapar, Western Kachchh, Gujarat. The genus Argentiniceras is a Lower Berriasian form known so far only from South America (Colombia, Peru, Chile, Argentina) and Antarctica (Alexander Island) i.e. the Andean marine fauna! province (also known as S. American or SE Pacific) and it is considered a good marker of Lower Berriasian. This is the first report of this genus from anywhere outside the Andean Province. Its discovery in Jurassic/Cretaceous passage beds helps more precise and better delineation of the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary in Kachchh. Further, together with the earlier reports of some South American Upper Tithonian genera from India, the present discovery also strengthens the evidence of direct marine connection between Andean and Indo-East-African marine fauna! provinces near the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary. Resume. Le genre Argentiniceras SPATH 1924 (= Andesites GERTH 1925) decouvert clans le membre Umia (couche oolithique verte) au Nord de Lakhapar (Gujarat, Ouest de l'Inde) est decrit et illustre. D'age Berriasien inferieur, il etait connu jusqu'a present uniquement du Sud de l'Amerique (Colombie, Perou, Chili, Argentine) et de l'Antarctique (Ile Alexander), c'est-a-dire de la province andine. Le genre est considere comme un bon marqueur stratigraphique du Berriasien inferieur et pour la premiere fois est cite en-dehors de la province andine, clans les couches de passage Jurassique-Cretace.
    [Show full text]
  • New Age Constraints for Early Paleogene Strata of Central Patagonia
    New age constraints for early Paleogene strata of central Patagonia, Argentina New age constraints for early Paleogene strata of central Patagonia, Argentina: Implications for the timing of South American Land Mammal Ages J. Marcelo Krause1,2,†, William C. Clyde3, Mauricio Ibañez-Mejía4,5, Mark D. Schmitz6, Timothy Barnum3, Eduardo S. Bellosi7, and Peter Wilf8 1CONICET–Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Avenida Fontana 140, 9100, Trelew, Argentina 2Departamento de Geología, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Ruta Provincial 1 s/n, 9000, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA 4Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 5Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA 6Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, Idaho 83725, USA 7CONICET–Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Ángel Gallardo 470, 1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina 8Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA ABSTRACT in our new magnetostratigraphic framework, rec ords of regional biotic responses to global we correlate the Peñas Coloradas Formation climatic events (e.g., Raigemborn et al., 2009, The Río Chico Group in the San Jorge to chrons C27n-26r (ca. 62.5 to ca. 61.6 Ma; 2014; Bellosi and González, 2010; Krause et al., Basin of central Patagonia (Argentina) pre- late Danian) and the section from the middle 2010; Dunn et al., 2015; Kohn et al., 2015; serves some of South America’s most signif- Las Flores to the uppermost Koluel-Kaike to Selkin et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 1997 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Cover: View looking south to the east side of the northeastern Organ Mountains near Augustin Pass, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Town of White Sands in distance. (Photo by Susan Bartsch-Winkler, 1995.) MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO By SUSAN BARTSCH-WINKLER, Editor ____________________________________________________ U. S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 97-521 U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Socorro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Shaefer, Interim Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Service Center Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES OF THE MIMBRES RESOURCE AREA IN SOUTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO Susan Bartsch-Winkler, Editor Summary Mimbres Resource Area is within the Basin and Range physiographic province of southwestern New Mexico that includes generally north- to northwest-trending mountain ranges composed of uplifted, faulted, and intruded strata ranging in age from Precambrian to Recent.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Jane E. Jenness, Kurt Roggensack, and David A. Lopez
    DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WRIR 83-4118-F MAP SHOWING OUTCROPS OF PRE-QUATERNARY ASH-FLOW TUFF AND LAHARIC BRECCIA, BASIN AND RANGE PROVINCE, NEW MEXICO Compiled by Jane E. Jenness, Kurt Roggensack, and David A. Lopez INTRODUCTION This map report is one of a series of geologic and hydrologic maps covering all or parts of States within the Basin and Range province of the' western United States. The map reports in this series contain detailed information on the geohydrology of the province, including the ground-water hydrology, ground-water quality, surface distribution of selected rock types, tectonic conditions, areal geophysics, Pleistocene lakes and marshes, and mineral and energy resources. This work is a part of the U.S. Geological Survey's program for geologic and hydrologic evaluation of the Basin and Range province to identify prospective regions for further study relative to isolation of high-level nuclear waste (Bedinger, Sargent, and Reed, 1984). This map report was prepared from published geologic maps and reports utilizing the project guidelines defined in Sargent and Bedinger (1984). The map shows the known occurrences of pre-Quaternary ash-flow tuff and laharic breccia and associated tuff breccia and agglomerate. The Description of Map Units includes the geologic age, radiometric age, if available, the lithology, thickness where available, and sources of data for the tuffs and laharic breccias in outlined and numbered areas in the counties of the study area. The radiometric ages do not necessarily represent the entire age range of the geologic units. Nomenclature of the geologic units in this map report is from published reports and does not necessarily conform to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Klondike Basin--Late Laramide Depocenter in Southern New Mexico
    KlondikeBasin-late Laramide depocenter insouthern New Mexico by TimothyF. Lawton and Busse// E. Clemons, Departmentof Earth Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003 Abstract It was deposited in alluvial-fan, fluvial, Basinis thusa memberof a groupof late and plava environments adiacent to the Laramidebasins developed in and ad- The Klondike Basindefined in this pa- Lund uftift. Conglomerates'inthe lower iacentto theforeland in Paleogenetime. per occurs mostly in the subsurfaceof part of the section were derived from southwestem New Mexico, north of the nearby sedimentary shata of the uplift; Introduction Cedar Mountain Range and southwest volcanic arenites in the middle and up- Mexico and of Deming. The basin is asymmetric, per part of the section were derived from In southwestern New thickening from a northern zero edge in older volcanic rocks, including the Hi- southeastern Arizona, the Laramide the vicinity of Interstate 10 to a maxi- dalgo Formation, lying to the west and orogeny created a broad belt of north- mum preservedthickness of2,750 ft (840 northwest, and possibly to the north as west-trending faults and folds during the m) of sedimentary strata about 3 mi (5 well. approximate time span of 75-55 Ma (Da- km) north of the sbuthembasin margin. The age of the Lobo Formation and vis, 1979;Drewes, 1988).In contrast with The southem basin margin is a reverse development of the Klondike Basin are Laramide deformation of the Rocky fault or fault complex that bounds the bracketedas early to middle Eocene.The Mountain region, extensivevolcanism ac- Laramide Luna uplift, alsodefined here. asdasts Hidalgo Formation, which occurs companied shortening in Arizona and New The uplift consists of Paleozoic strata in the Lobo, has an upper fission-track has been inter- overlain unconformably by mid-Tertiary ageof 54.9+2.7Ma (Marvinetal.,1978\.
    [Show full text]