AMD 21 Flora & Fauna Assessment.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AMD 21 Flora & Fauna Assessment.Pdf APPENDIX B GHD FLORA AND FAUNA ASSESSMENT Landcorp Report for Karratha Land Release - Amendment 21 Flora and Fauna Assessment September 2011 This Karratha Land Release – Amendment 21 Flora and Fauna Assessment Report (“Report”): 1. has been prepared by GHD Pty Ltd (“GHD”) for LandCorp; 2. may only be used and relied on by LandCorp; 3. must not be copied to, used by, or relied on by any person other than LandCorp without the prior written consent of GHD; GHD and its servants, employees and officers otherwise expressly disclaim responsibility to any person other than LandCorp arising from or in connection with this Report. To the maximum extent permitted by law, all implied warranties and conditions in relation to the services provided by GHD and the Report are excluded unless they are expressly stated to apply in this Report. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report: x were limited to those specifically detailed in section 3.4 of this Report; GHD expressly disclaims responsibility for any error in, or omission from, this Report arising from or in connection with any of the Assumptions being incorrect. Subject to the paragraphs in this section of the Report, the opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the time of preparation and may be relied on until 12 months, after which time, GHD expressly disclaims responsibility for any error in, or omission from, this Report arising from or in connection with those opinions, conclusions and any recommendations. 61/27315/113497 Karratha Land Release Flora and Fauna Assessment Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Study Area 1 1.3 Scope of Works 2 2. Desktop Assessment 4 2.1 Climate 4 2.2 Biogeography 4 2.3 Land Systems 5 2.4 Botanical District 5 2.5 Vegetation Types, Extent and Status 5 2.6 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities 7 2.7 Conservation Significant Flora 8 2.8 Conservation Significant Fauna 9 3. Methodology 12 3.1 Vegetation and Flora 12 3.2 Fauna 12 3.3 Nomenclature 13 3.4 Limitations 13 4. Results and Discussion 14 4.1 Vegetation Associations 14 4.2 Flora Diversity 20 4.3 Vegetation Condition 20 4.4 City Centre (DA-40) 22 4.5 Existing Townsite (DA-31) 24 4.6 Gap Ridge/Seven Mile (DA-13 and DA-26) 26 4.7 Nickol/Baynton (DA-27, DA-28 and DA-29) 29 4.8 The Links (DA-35) 32 4.9 Karratha Hills (DA-16, DA-32, DA-38 and DA-42) 35 4.10 Regals Valley (DA-14 and DA-15) 39 4.11 Airport (DA-30) 41 4.12 Karratha Industrial Estate (DA-17, DA41 and DA43) 43 5. Assessment against the Ten Clearing Principles 47 61/27315/113497 Karratha Land Release Flora and Fauna Assessment 6. Conclusion 52 7. References 55 Table Index Table 1 Precinct, Development Areas and size of development area in hectares 1 Table 2 Climatic data for Karratha Aero 4 Table 3 Vegetation association, extent and status within the study area 6 Table 5 Listing of potentially occurring Threatened and Priority fauna species within 10 km of the study area, with information source. 11 Table 6 Vegetation types recorded within the study area 15 Table 7 Vegetation condition rating scale 21 Table 8 Recorded location of Pebble-mound Mouse mounds 37 Table 9 Assesment against the Ten Clearing Principles 48 Table 10 Summary of flora and fauna constraints based on the field survey 53 Table 11 Conservation categories and definitions for EPBC Act listed flora and fauna species 61 Table 12 Conservation codes and descriptions for DEC Declared Rare and Priority flora species 61 Table 13 Western Australian Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 Conservation Codes for fauna 62 Table 14 DEC Priority fauna codes (Species not listed under the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950, but for which there is some concern) 62 Table 15 Flora species recorded within the Karratha study area 66 Table 16 Fauna species recorded within each site during the field survey 74 Appendices Appendix A 61/27315/113497 Karratha Land Release Flora and Fauna Assessment Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E 61/27315/113497 Karratha Land Release Flora and Fauna Assessment 1. Introduction 1.1 Background The Shire of Roebourne is currently updating the Karratha Town Planning Scheme No 8 as a part of its ‘City Growth Plan’. The City Growth Plan is to develop Karratha as the major City of the North and make it an attractive choice for future development. Part of the proposed Amendment 21 is to re-zone a number of sites which have been identified as having potential for development. The Amendment is designed to coordinate the growth of Karratha to include the infill of existing areas and support expansion of current residential and industrial zones. LandCorp has commissioned GHD to undertake a flora and fauna assessment of a number of Development Areas (DAs) proposed for re-zoning to identify constraints based on the conclusions of the Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment (PEIA) prepared by GHD (GHD, 2011). 1.2 Study Area The study srea lies within the Shire of Roebourne in the Pilbara Region of Western Australia, and contains 18 DAs from 9 precincts (identified in the City Growth Plan) in and around Karratha. Table 1 identifies the DAs surveyed as part of this flora and fauna assessment, the precinct in which they occur and the area they cover. The location of the 18 DAs (study area) is presented in Figure 1, Appendix A. Table 1 Precinct, Development Areas and size of development area in hectares Precinct Development Area (DA) Area (Ha) City Centre DA 40 22.3 Existing Townsite DA 31 5.3 Gap Ridge / Seven Mile DA 13 189.5 DA 26 194.5 Nickol / Baynton DA 27 79.9 DA 28 91.0 DA 29 18.0 The Links DA 35 19.1 Karratha Hills DA 16 71.8 DA 32 79.8 DA 38 21.4 DA 42 91.6 Regals Valley DA 14 406.4 61/27315/113497 Karratha Land Release 1 Flora and Fauna Assessment Precinct Development Area (DA) Area (Ha) DA 15 578.9 Airport DA 30 112.9 Karratha Industrial Estate DA 17 253.3 DA 41 84.1 DA 43 229.9 1.3 Scope of Works The flora and fauna assessment included both field and desktop assessments. The desktop assessment included: A review of the Department of Environment and Conservation’s (DEC) Rare and Threatened Flora database; A review of the DEC’s Threatened Fauna database; A review of local and regional significance of plant communities; A review of the Western Australian Museum database for threatened and endangered fauna; A review of the DEC’s Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs); and A review of the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts (DEWHA) database for areas listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The field survey verified the desktop study and provided a detailed assessment of the existing environment in the survey area and its relationship to adjoining areas. The field survey included the following actions and details: An inventory of the vascular plant species in the study area, undertaken by assessment of 50 m x 50 m quadrats and walking transect survey methods; A review of, and search for, significant flora species; An inventory of dominant exotic plants, including declared noxious plants and environmental weed species; Advice on whether weeds are likely to spread to and result in environmental harm to adjacent areas of native vegetation that is in good or better conditions; A description and location, including mapping, of plant communities; A rating of condition of the vegetation communities or areas using a published rating scale, as used in the assessment of vegetation in Bush Forever Sites (Government of Western Australia, 2000); A review of the local and regional significance of the plant communities in terms of their intrinsic value, extent, rarity and condition; 61/27315/113497 Karratha Land Release 2 Flora and Fauna Assessment Assessment of potential clearing against the Environmental Protection Act’s Ten Clearing Principles (Schedule 5). Each principle has been assessed in accordance with the DEC’s Guideline to Assessment – Clearing of Native Vegetation; An inventory of the vertebrate fauna species observed in the survey areas through targeted searches and opportunistic recordings of species; A night time spotlighting survey of areas likely to support cryptic and nocturnal species; An assessment of the habitat available for all species and particularly of the significant fauna species listed in the Preliminary Assessment. 61/27315/113497 Karratha Land Release 3 Flora and Fauna Assessment 2. Desktop Assessment 2.1 Climate The study area is located within the Pilbara region of Western Australia. The Pilbara region is subject to an arid-tropical climate with two distinct seasons; a hot summer from October to April and a mild winter from May to September. The average yearly evaporation exceeds rainfall by as much as 2,500 mm per year. Seasonally low but unreliable rainfall, together with high temperatures and high diurnal temperature variations are also characteristic climatic features of the region. The majority of the Pilbara has a bimodal rainfall distribution, resulting in two rainfall maxima per year. From January to March, rain results from storms penetrating from the north, producing sporadic and intense thunderstorms. Tropical cyclones and depressions moving southwards from northern Australian waters also cause heavy rainfall events. From May to June cold fronts move easterly across Western Australia and may occasionally reach the Pilbara Region.
Recommended publications
  • Seed Ecology Iii
    SEED ECOLOGY III The Third International Society for Seed Science Meeting on Seeds and the Environment “Seeds and Change” Conference Proceedings June 20 to June 24, 2010 Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Editors: R. Pendleton, S. Meyer, B. Schultz Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Preface Extended abstracts included in this proceedings will be made available online. Enquiries and requests for hardcopies of this volume should be sent to: Dr. Rosemary Pendleton USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station Albuquerque Forestry Sciences Laboratory 333 Broadway SE Suite 115 Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 87102-3497 The extended abstracts in this proceedings were edited for clarity. Seed Ecology III logo designed by Bitsy Schultz. i June 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Table of Contents Germination Ecology of Dry Sandy Grassland Species along a pH-Gradient Simulated by Different Aluminium Concentrations.....................................................................................................................1 M Abedi, M Bartelheimer, Ralph Krall and Peter Poschlod Induction and Release of Secondary Dormancy under Field Conditions in Bromus tectorum.......................2 PS Allen, SE Meyer, and K Foote Seedling Production for Purposes of Biodiversity Restoration in the Brazilian Cerrado Region Can Be Greatly Enhanced by Seed Pretreatments Derived from Seed Technology......................................................4 S Anese, GCM Soares, ACB Matos, DAB Pinto, EAA da Silva, and HWM Hilhorst
    [Show full text]
  • (Caesalpiniaceae) D.E
    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 18(2): 101-102 (1998) SENNA PHYLLODINEA A NEW COMBINATION IN SE1VNA (CAESALPINIACEAE) D.E. Symon State Herbarium of South Australia, Botanic Gardens of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 Abstract The combination Senna phyllodinea (R. Br.)Symon is made to facilitate the use of the name for those who wish to distinguish it from Senna artemisioides ssp. petiolaris. Introduction The presence of agamospermy, polyploidy and hybridity (Randell 1970) has resulted in a bewildering array of morphological forms in Senna in our arid areas. The discovery of abundant polyembryony (Symon 1956) led Randell (1970) to examine its causes and with this new understanding to present a new taxonomic account of the genus in Australia (Randell 1988, 1989, 1990). The division of the genus Cassia L. into three genera Cassia L. s.str., Senna Miller and Chamaecrista Moench has been widely accepted. It is ahnost solely in Australia in Senna ser. Subverrucosae that the taxonomic problems are acute. Randell (1989) has grouped the variants under three core taxa, S. glutinosa, S. cardiosperma and S. artemisioides, and one can agree with much of this grouping with some particular misgivings. A problem Under S. artemisioides ssp. petiolaris Randell has grouped all the variants that possess a flaftened petiole. Within this grouping are three widespread entitiesthat may be summarised as follows:- 1. A form with relatively broad phyllodes, green in aspect, straight or slightly curved, pubescent with minute appressed hairs, the lamina readilyvisible,glabrescent, sometimes pruinose, often with generally short, flattened, terminal leaflets. The pods are (6-) 7 (-9) mm wide, straight or slightly curved.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Inaequilatera Domin
    Acacia inaequilatera Domin Identifiants : 196/acaina Association du Potager de mes/nos Rêves (https://lepotager-demesreves.fr) Fiche réalisée par Patrick Le Ménahèze Dernière modification le 29/09/2021 Classification phylogénétique : Clade : Angiospermes ; Clade : Dicotylédones vraies ; Clade : Rosidées ; Clade : Fabidées ; Ordre : Fabales ; Famille : Fabaceae ; Classification/taxinomie traditionnelle : Règne : Plantae ; Sous-règne : Tracheobionta ; Division : Magnoliophyta ; Classe : Magnoliopsida ; Ordre : Fabales ; Famille : Fabaceae ; Genre : Acacia ; Synonymes : In the past often confused with Acacia pyrifoli ; Nom(s) anglais, local(aux) et/ou international(aux) : baderi , Partirri ; Rapport de consommation et comestibilité/consommabilité inférée (partie(s) utilisable(s) et usage(s) alimentaire(s) correspondant(s)) : Rapport de consommation et comestibilité/consommabilité inférée (partie(s) utilisable(s) et usage(s) alimentaire(s) correspondant(s)) : Données absentes/manquantes et/ou insuffisantesµ{{{(dp*)µ. Les graines vertes sont consommées néant, inconnus ou indéterminés.néant, inconnus ou indéterminés. Illustration(s) (photographie(s) et/ou dessin(s)): Autres infos : dont infos de "FOOD PLANTS INTERNATIONAL" : Distribution : Il pousse dans les zones arides. Il convient aux climats chauds et secs. Il a besoin d'un sol bien drainé et d'une Page 1/2 position ensoleillée{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : It grows in arid areas. It suits hot dry climates. It needs a well drained soil and a sunny position{{{0(+x). Localisation : Australie*{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : Australia*{{{0(+x). Notes : Il existe environ 1350 espèces d'Acacia. Plus de 1 000 se produisent en Australie. Aussi comme Mimosaceae{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : There are about 1,350 Acacia species. Over 1,000 occur in Australia. Also as Mimosaceae{{{0(+x).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List
    Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Lake Havasu City Recommended Landscaping Plant List Disclaimer Lake Havasu City has revised the recommended landscaping plant list. This new list consists of plants that can be adapted to desert environments in the Southwestern United States. This list only contains water conscious species classified as having very low, low, and low-medium water use requirements. Species that are classified as having medium or higher water use requirements were not permitted on this list. Such water use classification is determined by the type of plant, its average size, and its water requirements compared to other plants. For example, a large tree may be classified as having low water use requirements if it requires a low amount of water compared to most other large trees. This list is not intended to restrict what plants residents choose to plant in their yards, and this list may include plant species that may not survive or prosper in certain desert microclimates such as those with lower elevations or higher temperatures. In addition, this list is not intended to be a list of the only plants allowed in the region, nor is it intended to be an exhaustive list of all desert-appropriate plants capable of surviving in the region. This list was created with the intention to help residents, businesses, and landscapers make informed decisions on which plants to landscape that are water conscious and appropriate for specific environmental conditions. Lake Havasu City does not require the use of any or all plants found on this list. List Characteristics This list is divided between trees, shrubs, groundcovers, vines, succulents and perennials.
    [Show full text]
  • Palatability of Plants to Camels (DBIRD NT)
    Technote No. 116 June 2003 Agdex No: 468/62 ISSN No: 0158-2755 The Palatability of Central Australian Plant Species to Camels Dr B. Dorges, Dr J. Heucke, Central Australian Camel Industry Association and R. Dance, Pastoral Division, Alice Springs BACKGROUND About 600,000 camels (Camelus dromedarius) are believed to inhabit the arid centre of Australia, mainly in South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Most of these camels are feral. A small camel industry has developed, which harvests selected animals for domestic and export markets, primarily for meat. Camels can eat more than 80% of the common plant species found in Central Australia. Some plant species are actively sought by camels and may need to be protected. METHOD Observations of grazing preferences by camels were made periodically for up to 12 years on five cattle stations in Central Australia. Where camels were accustomed to the presence of humans, it was possible to observe their grazing preferences from a few metres. Radio transmitters were fitted on some camels for easy detection and observation at any time. These evaluations were used to establish a diet preference or palatability index for observed food plants. Table 1. Palatability index for camels Index Interpretation 1 only eaten when nothing else is available 2 rarely eaten 3 common food plant 4 main food plant at times 5 preferred food plant 6 highly preferred food plant 7 could be killed by camel browsing More information can be obtained from the web site of the Central Australian Camel Industry Association http://www.camelsaust.com.au 2 RESULTS Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Identification CONTACT in the Northern and Yorke Region
    Government of South Australia Northern and Yorke Natural FACT SHEET NO 2.018 Resources Management Board September 2011 NRM Plan Native plant identification CONTACT In the Northern and Yorke Region Main Office Basic plant identification is a vital skill for Northern and Yorke NRM Board land managers. It assists in appreciating PO Box 175 the vegetation around you and managing 41-49 Eyre Road that vegetation. Does a plant belong on a Crystal Brook SA 5523 site or is it a weed? Ph: (08) 8636 2361 Fx: (08) 8636 2371 This fact sheet introduces some of the www.nynrm.sa.gov.au common plant groups of the Northern and Yorke Region and how to identify them. All living things have been categorized into what is known as the Linnaean System of classification. Plants are grouped using common attributes until each plant is given a unique Classification. The steps of Classification are: • Kingdom • Division • Class • Order • Family • Subfamily • Genus • Species This results in a unique Botanical or Scientific name consisting of Genus and Species. Some plants are further split into sub species. Most plants have at least one common name. These are non scientific and often vary from region to region. Some plants may have the same common name, this often causes confusion so it is important to use the Botanical name. The plants right would be referred to as Eucalyptus leucoxylon subspecies leucoxylon or the South Australian Blue Gum. This plant is known as Yellow Gum in Victoria. Glossary of common botanical terms Annual A plant that completes its life within one year.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-2016
    Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-2016 J.S. Gillen June 2017 Report to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Canberra Disclaimer The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of use of the information contained herein as to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board and its employees expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. © South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board 2017 This report may be cited as: Gillen, J.S. Vegetation and soil assessment of selected waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-16. Report by Australian National University to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, Pt Augusta. Cover images: Warburton River April 2015; Cowarie Crossing Warburton River May 2016 Copies of the report can be obtained from: Natural Resources Centre, Port Augusta T: +61 (8) 8648 5300 E: [email protected] Vegetation and Soil Assessment 2 Contents 1 Study Aims and Funding Context 6 2 Study Region Characteristics 7 2.1 Location 7 2.2 Climate 7 3 The Diamantina: dryland river in an arid environment 10 3.1 Methodology 11 3.2 Stages 12
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 8399/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: EII Gas Transmission Service WA (Operations) Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Pipeline Licence PL60 Pipeline Licence PL63 Local Government Area: Shire of East Pilbara Town of Port Hedland Colloquial name: Telfer Gas Pipeline 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 265.449 Mechanical Removal Gas Pipeline Maintenance 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 12 September 2019 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description The vegetation of the application area is broadly mapped as the following Beard vegetation associations: 41: Shrublands; teatree scrub; 93: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; kanji over soft spinifex; 101: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; Acacia pachycarpa over soft spinifex; 117: Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; soft spinifex; 134: Mosaic: Hummock grasslands, open low tree steppe; desert bloodwood and feathertop spinifex on sandhills / Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; mixed shrubs over spinifex between sandhills; 157: Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; hard spinifex, Triodia wiseana ; 171: Hummock grasslands, low tree steppe; snappy gum over soft spinifex and Triodia brizioides ; 173: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; kanji over soft spinifex and Triodia wiseana on basalt; 589: Mosaic: Short bunch grassland - savanna / grass plain (Pilbara) / Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; soft spinifex; 619: Medium woodland; river gum ( Eucalyptus camaldulensis ); and 647: Hummock grasslands, dwarf-shrub steppe; Acacia translucens over soft spinifex (GIS Database).
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Botanical Significance Vol1 Part1
    Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Prepared By Matthew White, David Albrecht, Angus Duguid, Peter Latz & Mary Hamilton for the Arid Lands Environment Centre Plant Species and Sites of Botanical Significance in the Southern Bioregions of the Northern Territory Volume 1: Significant Vascular Plants Part 1: Species of Significance Matthew White 1 David Albrecht 2 Angus Duguid 2 Peter Latz 3 Mary Hamilton4 1. Consultant to the Arid Lands Environment Centre 2. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory 3. Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (retired) 4. Independent Contractor Arid Lands Environment Centre P.O. Box 2796, Alice Springs 0871 Ph: (08) 89522497; Fax (08) 89532988 December, 2000 ISBN 0 7245 27842 This report resulted from two projects: “Rare, restricted and threatened plants of the arid lands (D95/596)”; and “Identification of off-park waterholes and rare plants of central Australia (D95/597)”. These projects were carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Program. This volume should be cited as: White,M., Albrecht,D., Duguid,A., Latz,P., and Hamilton,M. (2000). Plant species and sites of botanical significance in the southern bioregions of the Northern Territory; volume 1: significant vascular plants. A report to the Australian Heritage Commission from the Arid Lands Environment Centre. Alice Springs, Northern Territory of Australia. Front cover photograph: Eremophila A90760 Arookara Range, by David Albrecht. Forward from the Convenor of the Arid Lands Environment Centre The Arid Lands Environment Centre is pleased to present this report on the current understanding of the status of rare and threatened plants in the southern NT, and a description of sites significant to their conservation, including waterholes.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix AMA LWUPL
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • (Cassia) Sennas Are Native to the Warm Regions of Australia And
    Senna (Cassia) Sennas are native to the warm regions of Australia and Africa and North America. Most sennas have fine textured foliage and bloom from late winter through spring. Most are evergreen, but those that bloom during the summer tend to be deciduous. While sennas have many uses in the landscape, they are most widely used for screening, and can reach a mature height and width of six to eight feet. They have varying degrees of cold hardiness, and require full sun. Sennas toler- ate heavier soils if given infrequent, deep watering, but prefer soils that drain rapidly. Sennas are extremely drought tolerant and require little or no supplemental fertilization or irrigation once estab- lished in the landscape (after 2 – 3 years). Their abundant color display is followed by a prolific crop of seed pods. The natural round form of sennas reduces the need for severe pruning, but lightly pruning after flowering will minimize the production of seed pods. As with most flowering plants, the butter-yellow flowers will attract pollina- tors including butterflies and bees. Plant your landscape carefully, keeping the ultimate size of the species in mind. Senna artemisioides Feathery Senna Feathery senna’s fine, gray, needle-like foliage provides a great backdrop for its fragrant yellow flowers. It contrasts well with other colors and textures in the landscape. Feathery senna is espe- cially suited for mass plantings, informal screens, and natural desert or wild gardens that require little or no maintenance. Feathery senna is a native of Australia. It requires full sun and the flowers can be damaged during late winter frosts.
    [Show full text]