Math 551 Lecture Notes Complex Variables: a Very Short Practical Guide (Fundamentals and Contour Integrals)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Math 551 Lecture Notes Complex Variables: a Very Short Practical Guide (Fundamentals and Contour Integrals) MATH 551 LECTURE NOTES COMPLEX VARIABLES: A VERY SHORT PRACTICAL GUIDE (FUNDAMENTALS AND CONTOUR INTEGRALS) Topics covered • Complex functions ◦ Complex differentiability; analytic functions ◦ Cauchy-Riemann equations (connection to harmonic functions) ◦ Multiple-valued functions and branch cuts • Preparing for contour integrals ◦ Poles and meromorphic functions ◦ Cauchy integral formula, Laurent series ◦ Contour integrals; contour deformation (in general) ◦ Residue theorem, calculating residues ◦ Trick for simple poles Introduction The main goal here is to introduce the fundamentals of complex analysis required to work with contour integrals that arise in the Fourier and Laplace transforms and the nice prop- erties of complex functions that inform the solutions. Our focus will be on these transform methods for solving PDEs, but it will be necessary to first learn the methods for computing contour integrals in general. As such, the treatment here is minimal and is by no means a thorough look at this rather deep subject. We will leave out some topics in favor of having more time to focus on the intended applications. Notation: The following notation will be used (refer back as needed): p • i = −1 (the imaginary unit) and z = x+iy is a complex number with real/imaginary parts x and y. A point z in the complex plane C is associated with (x; y) in R2. • A complex function f(z) with real/imaginary parts u and v can be written f(z) = f(x + iy) = u(x; y) + iv(x; y) • Γ is a contour in the complex plane, often parameterized by z(t) = (x(t); y(t)) R H • Γ f dz is a contour integral in the complex plane and Γ f dz is a contour integral over a closed contour (or `closed loop') 1. Review of complex numbers p • Complex numbers: C is the space of complex numbers z = x + iy where i = −1 is the `imaginary unit' and x = Re(z) = `real part'; y = Im(z) = `imaginary part': 1 2 COMPLEX VARIABLES Addition is component-wise as in R2 but i2 = −1 so z1z2 = (x1 + y1i)(x2 + y2i) = x1x2 − y1y2 + (y1x2 + x1y2)i: While tempting to compare to the plane R2, the `complex plane' has much more structure due to the multiplication of complex numbers. The conjugate (with an overbar) of z = x + iy and the modulus jzj (`magnitude') are p p z = x − yi; jzj = zz = x2 + y2: The conjugate distributes over sums/products (vw = vw etc.) and 1 1 Re(z) = (z + z); Im(z) = (z − z): 2 2 • Polar form: A complex number z can be written in rectangular or polar coordinates: z = x + iy or z = r cos θ + ir sin θ; r2 = x2 + y2; θ = arg z = tan−1(y=x) The values r and θ are the modulus and argument, respectively. Euler's formula and n-th roots: A critical result is Euler's formula, cos θ + i sin θ = eiθ (so z = reiθ in polar form) In particular, note that this implies that e2πi = 1 and zn = 1; n ≥ 1 an integer =) z = e2πik=n; k = 0; ··· n − 1 More generally, solving zn = c is done in polar form: zn = reiα =) z = r1=neiα/ne2πik=n; k = 0; ··· ; n − 1 iθ −iθ iθ1 iθ2 i(θ1+θ2) Other arithmetic is also easy in this form e.g. e = e and r1e · r2e = r1r2e : • Functions: A general complex function is a function of two variables, typically written as f(z; z) or a function of x; y for the input z = x + iy. It can be written in terms of real/imaginary components: f(z; z) = u(x; y) + iv(x; y) where u; v are real functions from the plane to R. Most real functions f(x) have `complexi- fied’ versions f(z) (just a function of z) e.g. f(x) = x2 =) f(z) = (x + iy)2 = x2 − y2 + i2xy: COMPLEX VARIABLES 3 2. Multi-valued functions, branch cuts A complex function can be multi-valued due to the formula e2πik = 1 for all integers k: Most functions are still single-valued dspite this, e.g. f(z) = z2 =) f(ze2πik) = z2e4πik = z2: However, multi-valued functions are also common. For example, consider f(z) = z1=2: Evaluating in polar coordinates with z = reiθ, f(reiθ) = f(reiθ · 1) = f(reiθ+i2πk) = r1=2eiθ=2eiπk; k = 0 or 1: That is, there are two versions of f that can be defined: ( f(z) = jzj1=2eiθ=2 (k = 0) f(z) = −|zj1=2eiθ=2 (k = 1) The two definitions are the branches of f. We must choose one branch to have a single val- ued function. The k = 0 version is called the principal branch of the function. Regardless of which branch is chosen, there is a jump across some line (segmaent) in the complex plane: The location of this line depends on the choice of argument. If we take θ 2 [−π; π] then there is a jump at θ = π since f(eiθ) ! i as θ increases to π ; f(eiθ) ! −i as θ decreases to −π so there is a jump at θ = π. The problem is that the argument θ = arg z is periodic , but ei arg z=2 has different values for θ's separated by 2π. We could also choose θ 2 [0; 2π], in which case the jump is across θ = 0 instead. The segment across which f is discontinuous is the branch cut and the endpoints are the branch points. In this case, we have one branch point at 0 and another `at 1' (at −∞ + 0i with θ 2 [−π; π] and 1 + 0i for θ 2 [0; 2π]. • Logarithms: An important example is the natural logarithm: ln(z) = ln(reiθe2πik) = ln(r) + iθ + 2πik = ln jf(z)j + i arg(z) + 2πik 4 COMPLEX VARIABLES with infinite number of branches (one for each integer k). The principal branch is ln(z) = ln(r) + iθ: This function has a branch cut where arg(z) jumps and a branch point at the origin, and discontinuous across this jump (by a value of 2πi). • Typically, the branch cut occurs where arg(z) jumps, and the range of θ determines the placement of the branch cut. For more complicated functions (to be discussed later), branch cuts can be segments or centered at branch points other than the origin. • Roots in general: Using the natural logarithm we may determine branch cuts for `n-th roots' and other powers using the definition zp = ep ln z: 1=m For example, consider (z − z1) : Using the above and the formula for ln z, 1 2πik (z − z )1=m = exp( ln(z − z )) = jz − z j1=m exp( arg(z − z )) 1 m 1 1 m 1 iα With z − z1 = re , this reads 1=m 1=m (z − z1) = r exp(2πikα=m): Each distinct value of exp(2πikα=m) yields a branch; there may be finite or infinitely many depending on the number of distinct values. Example (branch cut): Suppose we wish to define a branch of z4 so that f(z) = z4; f(1) = i; f is continuous along the real axis (except 0): There are four choices for z4, from the calculation f(ze2πik) = jzj1=4eiθ=4eπik=2: The one with f(1) = i is (plug in z = ei0) z4 = jzj1=4eiθ=4eiπ=2: The branch cut occurs at the endpoint of the range for θ = arg z: We needed continuity at θ = 0 and θ = π so the branch cut must be placed somewhere else e.g. by taking [−π=2; 3π=2] (any range including 0; π inside). This puts the branch cut at −π=2 . COMPLEX VARIABLES 5 3. Analytic functions A complex function f(z; z) has the form z + z z − z f(z; z) = u(x; y) + iv(x; y); x = ; y = : (3.1) 2 2 The function is called analytic or holomorphic if it is well-defined and solely a function of z. The `brute force' meaning of this is that if the expressions for x; y are plugged into (3.1), the z's cancel, leaving only z (so f = f(z)). This is equivalent to no dependence on z, written succinctly as @f f = f(z) () = 0: (3.2) @z The complex derivative of an analytic function is f(z + ∆z) − f(z) f 0(z) = lim : (3.3) ∆z!0 ∆z The limit can be taken over ∆z = ∆x + i∆y as ∆x; ∆y ! 0 in any way. Thus (3.3) is really two partial derivatives. However, when f is analytic, (3.3) is well-defined - the limit in any direction (∆x; ∆y ! 0 by any path) will give the same value f 0(z): To understand why f 0(z) is well defined, let z = x + iy, let f be analytic and write f(z) = u(x; y) + iv(x; y) We can take the derivative along the `real' or `imaginary' directions: 8 ∆x ! 0; ∆y = 0 (real) <> ∆z = ∆x + i∆y ! 0 with or :>∆x = 0; i∆y ! 0 (imaginary) This gives two values for f 0(z), which are f(z + ∆x) − f(z) @u @v f 0(z) = lim = + i ∆x!0 ∆x @x @x f(z + i∆y) − f(z) @u @v f 0(z) = lim = −i + ∆y!0 i∆y @y @y Equating the two, we obtain the Cauchy-Riemann equations, which also characterize analytic functions. Putting the results in a nice box: Analytic functions: For f = u(x; y) + iv(x; y), the following are equivalent: • f is well-defined and `a function of z only' (f = f(z) or equiv.
Recommended publications
  • Informal Lecture Notes for Complex Analysis
    Informal lecture notes for complex analysis Robert Neel I'll assume you're familiar with the review of complex numbers and their algebra as contained in Appendix G of Stewart's book, so we'll pick up where that leaves off. 1 Elementary complex functions In one-variable real calculus, we have a collection of basic functions, like poly- nomials, rational functions, the exponential and log functions, and the trig functions, which we understand well and which serve as the building blocks for more general functions. The same is true in one complex variable; in fact, the real functions we just listed can be extended to complex functions. 1.1 Polynomials and rational functions We start with polynomials and rational functions. We know how to multiply and add complex numbers, and thus we understand polynomial functions. To be specific, a degree n polynomial, for some non-negative integer n, is a function of the form n n−1 f(z) = cnz + cn−1z + ··· + c1z + c0; 3 where the ci are complex numbers with cn 6= 0. For example, f(z) = 2z + (1 − i)z + 2i is a degree three (complex) polynomial. Polynomials are clearly defined on all of C. A rational function is the quotient of two polynomials, and it is defined everywhere where the denominator is non-zero. z2+1 Example: The function f(z) = z2−1 is a rational function. The denomina- tor will be zero precisely when z2 = 1. We know that every non-zero complex number has n distinct nth roots, and thus there will be two points at which the denominator is zero.
    [Show full text]
  • MATH 305 Complex Analysis, Spring 2016 Using Residues to Evaluate Improper Integrals Worksheet for Sections 78 and 79
    MATH 305 Complex Analysis, Spring 2016 Using Residues to Evaluate Improper Integrals Worksheet for Sections 78 and 79 One of the interesting applications of Cauchy's Residue Theorem is to find exact values of real improper integrals. The idea is to integrate a complex rational function around a closed contour C that can be arbitrarily large. As the size of the contour becomes infinite, the piece in the complex plane (typically an arc of a circle) contributes 0 to the integral, while the part remaining covers the entire real axis (e.g., an improper integral from −∞ to 1). An Example Let us use residues to derive the formula p Z 1 x2 2 π 4 dx = : (1) 0 x + 1 4 Note the somewhat surprising appearance of π for the value of this integral. z2 First, let f(z) = and let C = L + C be the contour that consists of the line segment L z4 + 1 R R R on the real axis from −R to R, followed by the semi-circle CR of radius R traversed CCW (see figure below). Note that C is a positively oriented, simple, closed contour. We will assume that R > 1. Next, notice that f(z) has two singular points (simple poles) inside C. Call them z0 and z1, as shown in the figure. By Cauchy's Residue Theorem. we have I f(z) dz = 2πi Res f(z) + Res f(z) C z=z0 z=z1 On the other hand, we can parametrize the line segment LR by z = x; −R ≤ x ≤ R, so that I Z R x2 Z z2 f(z) dz = 4 dx + 4 dz; C −R x + 1 CR z + 1 since C = LR + CR.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1207.1472V2 [Math.CV]
    SOME SIMPLIFICATIONS IN THE PRESENTATIONS OF COMPLEX POWER SERIES AND UNORDERED SUMS OSWALDO RIO BRANCO DE OLIVEIRA Abstract. This text provides very easy and short proofs of some basic prop- erties of complex power series (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, rearrangement, composition, differentiation, uniqueness, Taylor’s series, Prin- ciple of Identity, Principle of Isolated Zeros, and Binomial Series). This is done by simplifying the usual presentation of unordered sums of a (countable) family of complex numbers. All the proofs avoid formal power series, double series, iterated series, partial series, asymptotic arguments, complex integra- tion theory, and uniform continuity. The use of function continuity as well as epsilons and deltas is kept to a mininum. Mathematics Subject Classification: 30B10, 40B05, 40C15, 40-01, 97I30, 97I80 Key words and phrases: Power Series, Multiple Sequences, Series, Summability, Complex Analysis, Functions of a Complex Variable. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 2 3. Absolutely Convergent Series and Commutativity 3 4. Unordered Countable Sums and Commutativity 5 5. Unordered Countable Sums and Associativity. 9 6. Sum of a Double Sequence and The Cauchy Product 10 7. Power Series - Algebraic Properties 11 8. Power Series - Analytic Properties 14 References 17 arXiv:1207.1472v2 [math.CV] 27 Jul 2012 1. Introduction The objective of this work is to provide a simplification of the theory of un- ordered sums of a family of complex numbers (in particular, for a countable family of complex numbers) as well as very easy proofs of basic operations and properties concerning complex power series, such as addition, scalar multiplication, multipli- cation, division, rearrangement, composition, differentiation (see Apostol [2] and Vyborny [21]), Taylor’s formula, principle of isolated zeros, uniqueness, principle of identity, and binomial series.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 336 Sample Problems
    Math 336 Sample Problems One notebook sized page of notes will be allowed on the test. The test will cover up to section 2.6 in the text. 1. Suppose that v is the harmonic conjugate of u and u is the harmonic conjugate of v. Show that u and v must be constant. ∞ X 2 P∞ n 2. Suppose |an| converges. Prove that f(z) = 0 anz is analytic 0 Z 2π for |z| < 1. Compute lim |f(reit)|2dt. r→1 0 z − a 3. Let a be a complex number and suppose |a| < 1. Let f(z) = . 1 − az Prove the following statments. (a) |f(z)| < 1, if |z| < 1. (b) |f(z)| = 1, if |z| = 1. 2πij 4. Let zj = e n denote the n roots of unity. Let cj = |1 − zj| be the n − 1 chord lengths from 1 to the points zj, j = 1, . .n − 1. Prove n that the product c1 · c2 ··· cn−1 = n. Hint: Consider z − 1. 5. Let f(z) = x + i(x2 − y2). Find the points at which f is complex differentiable. Find the points at which f is complex analytic. 1 6. Find the Laurent series of the function z in the annulus D = {z : 2 < |z − 1| < ∞}. 1 Sample Problems 2 7. Using the calculus of residues, compute Z +∞ dx 4 −∞ 1 + x n p0(z) Y 8. Let f(z) = , where p(z) = (z −z ) and the z are distinct and zp(z) j j j=1 different from 0. Find all the poles of f and compute the residues of f at these poles.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Logarithm
    Complex Analysis Math 214 Spring 2014 Fowler 307 MWF 3:00pm - 3:55pm c 2014 Ron Buckmire http://faculty.oxy.edu/ron/math/312/14/ Class 14: Monday February 24 TITLE The Complex Logarithm CURRENT READING Zill & Shanahan, Section 4.1 HOMEWORK Zill & Shanahan, §4.1.2 # 23,31,34,42 44*; SUMMARY We shall return to the murky world of branch cuts as we expand our repertoire of complex functions when we encounter the complex logarithm function. The Complex Logarithm log z Let us define w = log z as the inverse of z = ew. NOTE Your textbook (Zill & Shanahan) uses ln instead of log and Ln instead of Log . We know that exp[ln |z|+i(θ+2nπ)] = z, where n ∈ Z, from our knowledge of the exponential function. So we can define log z =ln|z| + i arg z =ln|z| + i Arg z +2nπi =lnr + iθ where r = |z| as usual, and θ is the argument of z If we only use the principal value of the argument, then we define the principal value of log z as Log z, where Log z =ln|z| + i Arg z = Log |z| + i Arg z Exercise Compute Log (−2) and log(−2), Log (2i), and log(2i), Log (−4) and log(−4) Logarithmic Identities z = elog z but log ez = z +2kπi (Is this a surprise?) log(z1z2) = log z1 + log z2 z1 log = log z1 − log z2 z2 However these do not neccessarily apply to the principal branch of the logarithm, written as Log z. (i.e. is Log (2) + Log (−2) = Log (−4)? 1 Complex Analysis Worksheet 14 Math 312 Spring 2014 Log z: the Principal Branch of log z Log z is a single-valued function and is analytic in the domain D∗ consisting of all points of the complex plane except for those lying on the nonpositive real axis, where d 1 Log z = dz z Sketch the set D∗ and convince yourself that it is an open connected set.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis
    Complex Analysis Andrew Kobin Fall 2010 Contents Contents Contents 0 Introduction 1 1 The Complex Plane 2 1.1 A Formal View of Complex Numbers . .2 1.2 Properties of Complex Numbers . .4 1.3 Subsets of the Complex Plane . .5 2 Complex-Valued Functions 7 2.1 Functions and Limits . .7 2.2 Infinite Series . 10 2.3 Exponential and Logarithmic Functions . 11 2.4 Trigonometric Functions . 14 3 Calculus in the Complex Plane 16 3.1 Line Integrals . 16 3.2 Differentiability . 19 3.3 Power Series . 23 3.4 Cauchy's Theorem . 25 3.5 Cauchy's Integral Formula . 27 3.6 Analytic Functions . 30 3.7 Harmonic Functions . 33 3.8 The Maximum Principle . 36 4 Meromorphic Functions and Singularities 37 4.1 Laurent Series . 37 4.2 Isolated Singularities . 40 4.3 The Residue Theorem . 42 4.4 Some Fourier Analysis . 45 4.5 The Argument Principle . 46 5 Complex Mappings 47 5.1 M¨obiusTransformations . 47 5.2 Conformal Mappings . 47 5.3 The Riemann Mapping Theorem . 47 6 Riemann Surfaces 48 6.1 Holomorphic and Meromorphic Maps . 48 6.2 Covering Spaces . 52 7 Elliptic Functions 55 7.1 Elliptic Functions . 55 7.2 Elliptic Curves . 61 7.3 The Classical Jacobian . 67 7.4 Jacobians of Higher Genus Curves . 72 i 0 Introduction 0 Introduction These notes come from a semester course on complex analysis taught by Dr. Richard Carmichael at Wake Forest University during the fall of 2010. The main topics covered include Complex numbers and their properties Complex-valued functions Line integrals Derivatives and power series Cauchy's Integral Formula Singularities and the Residue Theorem The primary reference for the course and throughout these notes is Fisher's Complex Vari- ables, 2nd edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis (Princeton Lectures in Analysis, Volume
    COMPLEX ANALYSIS Ibookroot October 20, 2007 Princeton Lectures in Analysis I Fourier Analysis: An Introduction II Complex Analysis III Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces Princeton Lectures in Analysis II COMPLEX ANALYSIS Elias M. Stein & Rami Shakarchi PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Copyright © 2003 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Control Number 2005274996 ISBN 978-0-691-11385-2 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available The publisher would like to acknowledge the authors of this volume for providing the camera-ready copy from which this book was printed Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ press.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 5 7 9 10 8 6 To my grandchildren Carolyn, Alison, Jason E.M.S. To my parents Mohamed & Mireille and my brother Karim R.S. Foreword Beginning in the spring of 2000, a series of four one-semester courses were taught at Princeton University whose purpose was to present, in an integrated manner, the core areas of analysis. The objective was to make plain the organic unity that exists between the various parts of the subject, and to illustrate the wide applicability of ideas of analysis to other fields of mathematics and science. The present series of books is an elaboration of the lectures that were given. While there are a number of excellent texts dealing with individual parts of what we cover, our exposition aims at a different goal: pre- senting the various sub-areas of analysis not as separate disciplines, but rather as highly interconnected.
    [Show full text]
  • A Formal Proof of Cauchy's Residue Theorem
    A Formal Proof of Cauchy's Residue Theorem Wenda Li and Lawrence C. Paulson Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge fwl302,[email protected] Abstract. We present a formalization of Cauchy's residue theorem and two of its corollaries: the argument principle and Rouch´e'stheorem. These results have applications to verify algorithms in computer alge- bra and demonstrate Isabelle/HOL's complex analysis library. 1 Introduction Cauchy's residue theorem | along with its immediate consequences, the ar- gument principle and Rouch´e'stheorem | are important results for reasoning about isolated singularities and zeros of holomorphic functions in complex anal- ysis. They are described in almost every textbook in complex analysis [3, 15, 16]. Our main motivation of this formalization is to certify the standard quantifier elimination procedure for real arithmetic: cylindrical algebraic decomposition [4]. Rouch´e'stheorem can be used to verify a key step of this procedure: Collins' projection operation [8]. Moreover, Cauchy's residue theorem can be used to evaluate improper integrals like Z 1 itz e −|tj 2 dz = πe −∞ z + 1 Our main contribution1 is two-fold: { Our machine-assisted formalization of Cauchy's residue theorem and two of its corollaries is new, as far as we know. { This paper also illustrates the second author's achievement of porting major analytic results, such as Cauchy's integral theorem and Cauchy's integral formula, from HOL Light [12]. The paper begins with some background on complex analysis (Sect. 2), fol- lowed by a proof of the residue theorem, then the argument principle and Rouch´e'stheorem (3{5).
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Complex Analysis
    4 Complex Analysis “He is not a true man of science who does not bring some sympathy to his studies, and expect to learn something by behavior as well as by application. It is childish to rest in the discovery of mere coincidences, or of partial and extraneous laws. The study of geometry is a petty and idle exercise of the mind, if it is applied to no larger system than the starry one. Mathematics should be mixed not only with physics but with ethics; that is mixed mathematics. The fact which interests us most is the life of the naturalist. The purest science is still biographical.” Henry David Thoreau (1817 - 1862) We have seen that we can seek the frequency content of a signal f (t) defined on an interval [0, T] by looking for the the Fourier coefficients in the Fourier series expansion In this chapter we introduce complex numbers and complex functions. We a ¥ 2pnt 2pnt will later see that the rich structure of f (t) = 0 + a cos + b sin . 2 ∑ n T n T complex functions will lead to a deeper n=1 understanding of analysis, interesting techniques for computing integrals, and The coefficients can be written as integrals such as a natural way to express analog and dis- crete signals. 2 Z T 2pnt an = f (t) cos dt. T 0 T However, we have also seen that, using Euler’s Formula, trigonometric func- tions can be written in a complex exponential form, 2pnt e2pint/T + e−2pint/T cos = . T 2 We can use these ideas to rewrite the trigonometric Fourier series as a sum over complex exponentials in the form ¥ 2pint/T f (t) = ∑ cne , n=−¥ where the Fourier coefficients now take the form Z T −2pint/T cn = f (t)e dt.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Complex Analysis
    Chapter 2 Complex Analysis In this part of the course we will study some basic complex analysis. This is an extremely useful and beautiful part of mathematics and forms the basis of many techniques employed in many branches of mathematics and physics. We will extend the notions of derivatives and integrals, familiar from calculus, to the case of complex functions of a complex variable. In so doing we will come across analytic functions, which form the centerpiece of this part of the course. In fact, to a large extent complex analysis is the study of analytic functions. After a brief review of complex numbers as points in the complex plane, we will ¯rst discuss analyticity and give plenty of examples of analytic functions. We will then discuss complex integration, culminating with the generalised Cauchy Integral Formula, and some of its applications. We then go on to discuss the power series representations of analytic functions and the residue calculus, which will allow us to compute many real integrals and in¯nite sums very easily via complex integration. 2.1 Analytic functions In this section we will study complex functions of a complex variable. We will see that di®erentiability of such a function is a non-trivial property, giving rise to the concept of an analytic function. We will then study many examples of analytic functions. In fact, the construction of analytic functions will form a basic leitmotif for this part of the course. 2.1.1 The complex plane We already discussed complex numbers briefly in Section 1.3.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Note for Math 220A Complex Analysis of One Variable
    Lecture Note for Math 220A Complex Analysis of One Variable Song-Ying Li University of California, Irvine Contents 1 Complex numbers and geometry 2 1.1 Complex number field . 2 1.2 Geometry of the complex numbers . 3 1.2.1 Euler's Formula . 3 1.3 Holomorphic linear factional maps . 6 1.3.1 Self-maps of unit circle and the unit disc. 6 1.3.2 Maps from line to circle and upper half plane to disc. 7 2 Smooth functions on domains in C 8 2.1 Notation and definitions . 8 2.2 Polynomial of degree n ...................... 9 2.3 Rules of differentiations . 11 3 Holomorphic, harmonic functions 14 3.1 Holomorphic functions and C-R equations . 14 3.2 Harmonic functions . 15 3.3 Translation formula for Laplacian . 17 4 Line integral and cohomology group 18 4.1 Line integrals . 18 4.2 Cohomology group . 19 4.3 Harmonic conjugate . 21 1 5 Complex line integrals 23 5.1 Definition and examples . 23 5.2 Green's theorem for complex line integral . 25 6 Complex differentiation 26 6.1 Definition of complex differentiation . 26 6.2 Properties of complex derivatives . 26 6.3 Complex anti-derivative . 27 7 Cauchy's theorem and Morera's theorem 31 7.1 Cauchy's theorems . 31 7.2 Morera's theorem . 33 8 Cauchy integral formula 34 8.1 Integral formula for C1 and holomorphic functions . 34 8.2 Examples of evaluating line integrals . 35 8.3 Cauchy integral for kth derivative f (k)(z) . 36 9 Application of the Cauchy integral formula 36 9.1 Mean value properties .
    [Show full text]
  • PSI Lectures on Complex Analysis
    PSI Lectures on Complex Analysis Tibra Ali August 14, 2014 Lecture 4 1 Evaluating integrals using the residue theorem Recall the residue theorem. If f (z) has singularities at z1, z2,..., zk which are enclosed by a contour C then C z1 z2 zK+1 z3 zk z4 zk+2 zk+3 Figure 1: Using the residue theorem I k f (z)dz = 2pi ∑ Res of f (z) at z = zi C i=1 1 2 Examples 2.1 Trigonometric Integrals First we consider integrals of the form Z 2p 1 I = dq, with a > b > 0 and (a, b) 2 R. 0 a + b cos q Since this is an integral on the circle we can choose our contour C to be the unit circle on the complex plane. We set z = eiq which implies −idz = dq. z However, we want as our integrand to be a meromorphic function whose residues are easy to compute. So let us choose z + 1/z cos q = . 2 Then our integral becomes I dz I = −2i . C 2za + b + bz2 So we have to find the zeros of the polynomial P(z) = bz2 + 2za + b that lie inside the unit circle. The two zeros are p a a2 − b2 z± = − ± . b b a 2 2 Note that since a > b, we have − b < −1 as well as a − b > 0. Thus we see that z− < −1 and hence outside the unit circle. On the other hand p ! p ! a a2 − b2 a a2 − b2 z+z− = − + − − b b b b = 1. This implies jz+j < 1.
    [Show full text]