Shifting Towards Offshore Wind Energy—Recent Activity and Future Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shifting Towards Offshore Wind Energy—Recent Activity and Future Development Energy Policy 53 (2013) 136–148 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol Shifting towards offshore wind energy—Recent activity and future development J.K. Kaldellis n, M. Kapsali Lab of Soft Energy Applications & Environmental Protection, TEI of Piraeus, P.O. Box 41046, Athens 12201, Greece HIGHLIGHTS c An overview of the activity noted in the field of offshore wind energy is carried out. c Emphasis is given on the current status and future trends of the technology. c Wind energy production and availability issues are discussed. c Economic issues such as investment and energy production costs are also analysed. article info abstract Article history: To date, most of the existing wind farms have been built on-land but during the last few years many Received 10 February 2012 countries have also invested in offshore applications. The shift towards offshore wind project Accepted 11 October 2012 developments has mainly been driven by European energy policies, especially in north-west countries. Available online 21 November 2012 In offshore sites the winds are stronger and steadier than on-land, making wind farms more productive Keywords: with higher capacity factors. On the other hand, although offshore wind energy is not in its infancy Availability period, most of the costs associated with its development are still much higher from onshore Reliability counterparts; however some recent technological progress may have the potential to narrow this Levelized cost gap in the years to come. In the present work, an overview of the activity noted in the field of offshore wind energy is carried out, with emphasis being given on the current status and future trends of the technology employed, examining at the same time energy production and availability issues as well as economic considerations. & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Up to now, wind energy development has mainly taken place onshore. Offshore wind power technology comprises a relatively During the last 20 years, many countries all over the world new challenge for the international wind industry with a demon- have invested in the wind power sector in view of facing the stration history of around twenty years and about a ten-year rapidly increasing population and the limited fossil fuel resources commercial history for large, utility-scale projects. In the end of along with the adverse impacts of conventional power generation 2011, worldwide wind power capacity reached 240 GW (WWEA, on climate and human health. Wind energy is currently consid- 2012), from which, 2% comprised offshore installations. The main ered as an indigenous, competitive and sustainable way to motivation for moving offshore, despite the low or even null achieve future carbon reductions and renewable energy targets impact on humans and the opportunity of building wind farms in but issues such as the scarcity of appropriate on-land installation coastal areas close to many population centres, stemmed from the sites or public concerns related to noise, visual impact, impact on considerably higher and steadier wind speeds met in the open birdlife and land use conflicts often block its future development sea, even exceeding 8 m/s at heights of 50 m. Compared to the (Esteban et al., 2011; Kaldellis et al., 2012). As a result, a onshore counterpart, offshore wind energy has greater resource substantial shift towards the vast offshore wind resources has potential, which generally increases with distance from the shore. been made and an incipient market has emerged, i.e. offshore This fact results to considerably higher energy yield (Pryor and wind power. Barthelmie, 2001), as the power output is theoretically a function of the cube of the wind speed. However, the net gains due to the higher specific offshore energy production are counterbalanced n by the higher capital, installation and maintenance costs and so Corresponding author. Tel.: þ30 210 5381237; fax: þ30 210 5381467. E-mail address: [email protected] (J.K. Kaldellis). the economic prospects of offshore wind energy utilisation are URL: http://www.sealab.gr (J.K. Kaldellis). not necessarily better than the onshore ones. 0301-4215/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.032 J.K. Kaldellis, M. Kapsali / Energy Policy 53 (2013) 136–148 137 As far as the technology employed is concerned, it should be In the following years, relatively small offshore wind power noted that the design of offshore wind power projects has been projects were installed in the United Kingdom, Denmark, the based considerably on the long-term experience gained from Netherlands and Sweden, at distances of up to 7 km from the on-shore wind farms and from the oil and gas industry, while coast and depths of up to 8 m. Multi-megawatt wind turbines the commercial wind turbines used, currently having capacity appeared later, along with the opportunity of experiencing deeper ratings up to 5 MW, comprise adaptations from land-based counter- waters in the sea. In 2000, the construction of the first large-scale parts. However, offshore wind turbine technology is evolving at a offshore wind farm of ‘‘Middelgrunden’’ with a total rated power fast pace and thus much larger machines are expected in the of 40 MW (20 wind turbines of 2 MW each) ended 2 km outside of foreseeable future, specifically constructed for offshore use, which the harbour of Copenhagen in Denmark, where the seabed is will likely benefit from economies of scale resulting in significant situated between 2.5 and 5 m under sea level. The demonstration cost reduction. project of ‘‘Middelgrunden’’ in Denmark led the way for two All the above issues are analysed in this work. More precisely, larger offshore wind power projects, i.e. Horns Rev I (160 MW) in the objective of the present study is to provide a short review of 2002 and Nysted (165.2 MW) in 2003. However, the construction the activity noted in the field of the offshore wind energy at a costs of these projects were higher than anticipated, while some global level, emphasising on global market issues, current status unexpected failures occurred, resulting mainly from the turbines’ and future trends of the technology employed, examining at the exposure to harsh wind and wave conditions. It was such draw- same time energy production and availability issues as well as backs that held back development of the offshore wind power economic considerations such as investment and associated costs market for a respectable time period (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, great of electricity generation. efforts made by manufacturers and developers in order to identify and improve problems associated with this stage (Musial et al., 2010) eventually led the way for a number of new commercial offshore wind farm installations, all located in European waters. 2. Global offshore wind energy activity The year 2010 was a record-breaking year for the European offshore wind energy market. New installations accounted for According to the existing literature, the first documented about 900 MW (Fig. 1) (which was about 10% of all new wind theoretical concepts for installing wind turbines at sea were power installations) (EWEA, 2011). As for the end of 2011, 235 developed in Germany in the early 1930s by Hermann Honnef. new offshore wind turbines, with a total capacity of about Almost forty years later, off the coast of Massachusetts, Professor 870 MW, were fully connected to the power grids of the UK, William E. Heronemus introduced the idea of large floating wind Germany, Denmark and Portugal. In total, as for the end of 2011, turbine platforms (Heronemus, 1972). None of these early visions there were almost 1400 offshore wind turbines fully grid con- became reality however. The first offshore wind power test nected with a total capacity of about 3.8 GW (Fig. 1) comprising facility was eventually set up in Sweden, twenty years later, in 53 wind farms spread over ten European countries. 1990. It was a single wind turbine of 220 kW rated power, located As of February 2012, the Walney wind farm in the United at a distance of 250 m from the coast, supported on a tripod Kingdom is the largest offshore wind farm in the world structure anchored to the seabed about 7 m deep. (367 MW), followed by the Thanet offshore wind project The first full-scale development of offshore wind power projects (300 MW), in the UK. The London Array (630 MW) is the largest was driven largely by commercial aspirations of the European wind project currently under construction which is also located in the industry, considering oceans as a feasible solution to compensate UK. In total, 18 new wind farms, totalling 5.3 GW are currently for the scarcity of onshore sites. The first commercial offshore wind under construction and 18 GW are fully-consented in twelve farm was commissioned in 1991 in Denmark, in shallow water European countries with Germany possessing almost 50% of the (2–6 m deep), 1.5–3 km north from the coast of the island of total consented installations (EWEA, 2012). Once completed, Lolland, near the village of ‘‘Vindeby’’. This small wind farm, which Europe’s offshore wind power capacity will reach 27 GW. is still in operation, consists of eleven stall controlled wind turbines Up till now vast deployment has taken place in Northern of total rated power 4.95 MW (450 kW each) all being placed on Europe, a situation expected to continue for the next few years as gravity-based foundations. The cost of construction for this project well. Actually, more than 90% of the global offshore wind farms is stated to be approximately 10 million Euros (SEAS-NVE, 2011).
Recommended publications
  • Analysing Changes in Electricity Industries Against Actors and Technologies: Utility to Business Transformations in Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain
    Received February 28, 2012 / Accepted June 9, 2012 J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2012, Volume 7, Issue 2 Analysing Changes in Electricity Industries Against Actors and Technologies: Utility to Business Transformations in Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain Mari Ratinen1, Peter Lund Abstract Liberalization of electricity markets, governmental policies for renewable electricity and technology development are transforming national electricity industries. However, there are considerable national differences in how these industries have changed and which businesses have been developed. We propose a typology for comparing changes in electricity industry based on the changes in the actors and technologies. Wind power and solar photovoltaic are used here as technology examples. A qualitative analysis of the changes in electricity industries in four EU member states is presented. Based on the preliminary findings, we conclude that if the industry consists of many, small firms with relatively loose ties with the government the industry is more likely to change than if it consists of few large firms with strong relations with the government. Keywords: electricity industry; liberalization; technology development; wind energy; solar photovoltaic 1Aalto University, School of Sciences, P.O. Box 11000, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland. email: [email protected] ISSN: 0718-2724. (http://www.jotmi.org) Journal of Technology Management & Innovation © Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 87 J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2012, Volume 7, Issue 2 1. Introduction fluence energy policies. Citizens influencing by voting green parties, supporting anti-nuclear movements or parties with National electricity industries are undergoing fundamen- environmental programs have brought about changes in en- tal changes, which are brought about by three interlinked ergy policies and technologies (O’Neill, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 Tnuos Tariffs
    Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 1 Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs This information paper contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) that National Grid will use in the calculation of Generation TNUoS charges from April 2018. October 2017 October 2017 Contents Executive Summary 4 Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 5 Table 1: Annual Load Factors By Generating Station 5 Table 2: Generic Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 10 Changes to the Draft ALFs 11 The Onshore Wind Generic ALF has changed 11 Edinbane 11 Pen Y Cymoedd 11 Inactive Generators 12 How Are ALFs Calculated? 13 Five Years Of Data 13 Four Years Of Data 14 Three Years Of Data 14 Fewer Than Three Years Of Data 14 Calculation Of Partial Year ALFs 15 Generic ALFs 15 Next Steps 15 Appendix A: Generation Charging Principles 16 CMP268 16 The TNUoS Wider Tariff 16 Other Charges 17 Contact Us If you have any comments or questions on the contents or format of this report, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us. Team Email & Phone [email protected] 01926 654633 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 3 Executive Summary This document contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) to be used in the calculation of generator Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs for 2018/19, effective from 1 April 2018. The ALFs are based on generation data for five years from 2012/13 until 2016/17.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA Wind Task 26
    Work Package 1 Final Report IEA Wind Task 26 Multi-national Case Study of the Financial Cost of Wind Energy Leading Authors Paul Schwabe: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Sander Lensink: Energy Research Center of the Netherlands Maureen Hand: National Renewable Energy Laboratory IEA Wind Task 26 Multi-national Case Study of the Financial Cost of wind Energy Work Package 1 Lead Authors: Paul Schwabe: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Sander Lensink: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands Maureen Hand: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Contributing Authors: Athanasia Arapogianni: European Wind Energy Association Alberto Ceña: Spanish Wind Energy Association Karlynn Cory: National Renewable Energy Laboratory Markus Geissmann: Swiss Federal Office of Energy Klaus Hammes: Swedish Energy Agency Stefan Luxembourg: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands Ángeles Mora Sánchez: Spanish Wind Energy Association Edward James-Smith: Ea Energy Analyses Jan Wallasch: Deutsche WindGuard Paul Wilczek: European Wind Energy Association The IEA Wind agreement, also known as the Implementing Agreement for cooperation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems, functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings, and publications of IEA Wind do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of all its individual member countries. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 1617 Cole Boulevard NREL/TP-6A2-48155 Golden, Colorado 80401 March 2011 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages of Wind Power
    Moravian Women’s Association Home and Overseas Paper – April 2013 Wind power Blow me down The North wind blew on Monday As the East wind got the flu The West wind blew on Tuesday As the South wind never knew The North East wind had Wednesday As the South West wasn’t chuffed The North West blew on Thursday As the South East hardly puffed The East and West blew Friday As the others had a rest The North and South blew Saturday As the weekends were the best The lot of them had Sunday As the winds turned into storm The whole of them had Monday off As the week got back to norm © 2008 David Threadgold Rambling Riddles & Rhymes This poem seems to capture how we have been at the mercy of what seems like one of the worst winters for cold, wet, windy weather we have had for a long time. In the UK we now have wind farms, both on land, and offshore. While those on land are most obvious and cause most controversy, the offshore Walney Wind Farm produces 367 megawatts and the Thanet Offshore Wind Project 300 megawatts. The London Array in the Thames estuary (630 megawatts) which opened in March 2013, is the largest wind farm in the world, and when complete, it will cover 90 square miles. Its 175 turbines will be capable of generating enough energy to power nearly half a million homes – two thirds of the homes in Kent, and reduce CO2 emissions by over 900,000 tonnes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Walney Extension Scoping Report
    Walney Extension offshore wind farm – EIA Scoping Report September 2010 Walney Extension offshore wind farm rights, 2010. All rights reserved. For other chart data copyright see Appendix C. Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Co-ordinated by: Ferdinando Giammichele and Trine Hoffman Sørensen. Prepared by: Ferdinando Giammichele, Stuart Livesey, Nicola Barberis-Negra, Trine Hoffman Sørensen, Jennifer Brack, Joanne Myers, Thomas Walsh, Emily Marshall, Aja Brodal, and Shiu-Yeung Hui. Checked by: Ferdinando Giammichele, Trine Hoffman Sørensen, Jesper Krarup Holst, and Hans Lyhne Borg. Approved by: Jesper Krarup Holst. DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. 33 Grosvenor Place, Belgravia, London, SW1X 7HY Additional contributions and review by: Project Management Support Services Ltd., Brown & May Marine Ltd. and Bond Pearce LLP. Version: Final. Date: September 27th 2010. Submitted to the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) on September 27th 2010. © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd, 2010. All rights reserved. This report is also downloadable from the Walney offshore wind farm website at: www.walneyextension.co.uk or a paper copy can be requested by writing to: [email protected] . Pictures: © Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd., 2010. Front cover picture: Horns Rev 2 offshore wind farm off the western Danish coast at Esbjerg, September 2009 © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd., 2010. Charts: © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd., 2010. United Kingdom Hydrographic Office admiralty charts: © SeaZone Solutions Ltd. Licence no. 092008.004 to DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. United Kingdom coastline and background raster tiles (1:250,000 and 1:10,000) contain OS OpenData: Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and database DONG Energy Page 2 of 151 Walney Extension offshore wind farm – EIA Scoping Report September 2010 Table of Contents Summary ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Codes and Section 106 Agreements
    NIPA Insights II Programme Research Project Preparing a Flexibility Toolkit Project B Mechanisms to support flexibility: Requirements and codes Professor Janice Morphet and Dr Ben Clifford May 2019 Mechanisms to support flexibility (Requirements and codes): Summary report Contents Introduction 2 Scope for flexibility in NSIPs 4 Requirements 7 Codes and Section 106 agreements 11 Case studies 15 Suggestions for the toolkit 24 Appendices 31 Acknowledgements 37 About the authors 37 1. Mechanisms to support flexibility (Requirements and codes): Summary report 1. Introduction When the 2008 Planning Act was introduced, it was intended to create a system that guaranteed decision making about national infrastructure projects within a specified time and a process where consent for the project is granted through a Statutory Instrument, usually with some form of detailed design then following consent. The approach to flexibility and light touch on detail was enshrined in the philosophy of the Act, given that previous experience of obtaining planning consent for major infrastructure projects had frequently been lengthy. This meant that there was a focus on obtaining the Development Consent Order (DCO) for the project, leaving the flexibility required for later delivery to follow at a later stage. Since 2008, the definition of NSIPs and the requirement to assess their environmental consequences have allowed for some flexibility in the delineation of their site boundary, using the Rochdale Envelope However, in practice, some more detailed aspects of a project have been required to be included within the DCO. This included the requirements over use of land and associated Compulsory Acquisition powers. As NSIPs moved from consent to construction, the assumed flexibility in the system was found to be limited in some cases, requiring changes to the DCO.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Energy Potential for Bahrain Via Multi-Criteria Evaluation
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 18 December 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202012.0474.v1 Research Article Offshore Wind Energy Potential for Bahrain via Multi-criteria Evaluation Mohamed Elgabiri 1, Diane Palmer 1,*, Hanan Al Buflasa 2 and Murray Thomson 1 1 Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK; [email protected] 2 University of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bahrain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44 1509 635604. ORCID 0000-0002-5381-0504 Abstract: Current global commitments to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases encourage national targets for renewable generation. Due to its small land mass, offshore wind could help Bahrain to fulfill its obligations. However, no scoping study has yet been carried out. The methodology presented here addresses this research need. It employs Analytical Hierarchy Process and pairwise comparison methods in a Geographical Information Systems environment. Publicly available land use, infrastructure and transport data are used to exclude areas unsuitable for development due to physical and safety constraints. Meteorological and oceanic opportunities are ranked, then competing uses are analyzed to deliver optimal sites for wind farms. The potential annual wind energy yield is calculated by dividing the sum of optimal areas by a suitable turbine footprint, to deliver maximum turbine number. Ten favourable wind farm areas were identified in Bahrain’s territorial waters, representing about 4% of the total maritime area, and capable of supplying 2.68 TWh/yr of wind energy or almost 10% of the Kingdom’s annual electricity consumption. Detailed maps of potential sites for offshore wind construction are provided in the paper, giving an initial plan for installation in these locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Kirksanton
    Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Kirksanton EN-6: Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation Planning for new energy infrastructure October 2010 Preface: Appraisal of Sustainability of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement The Appraisal of Sustainability (AoS), incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement (Nuclear NPS) has been undertaken at a strategic level. It considers the effects of the proposed policy at a national level and the sites to be assessed for their suitability for the deployment of new nuclear power stations by 2025. These strategic appraisals are part of an ongoing assessment process that started in March 2008 and, following completion of this AoS, will continue with project level assessments when developers make applications for development consent in relation to specific projects. Applications for development consents to the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) will need to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement having been the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The AoS/SEA Reports are presented in the following documents: AoS Non-Technical Summary Main AoS Report of revised draft Nuclear NPS Introduction Approach and Methods Alternatives Radioactive Waste Findings Summary of Sites Technical Appendices Annexes to Main AoS Report: Reports on Sites Site AoS Reports Technical Appendices All documents are available on the website of the Department of Energy and Climate Change at http://www.energynpsconsultation.decc.gov.uk This document is the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Kirksanton. This report has been prepared by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) with expert input from a team of specialist planning and environmental consultancies led by MWH UK Ltd with Enfusion Ltd, Nicholas Pearson Associates Ltd, Studsvik UK Ltd and Metoc plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Networks Connections Update
    Transmission Networks Connections Update May 2015 SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO Back to Contents TNCU – May 2015 Page 01 Contents Foreword ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 02 1. Introduction /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 03 2. Connection timescales ///////////////////////////////////////////// 04 Illustrative connection timescales /////////////////////////////////////// 04 Connections by area /////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 05 3. GB projects by year ///////////////////////////////////////////////// 06 Contracted overall position /////////////////////////////////////////////// 08 Renewable projects status by year ///////////////////////////////////// 10 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Excluding Nuclear /// 11 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Nuclear only ////////// 12 Interconnector projects status by year //////////////////////////////// 13 4. Additional data by transmission owner ///////////////////////// 14 National Grid Electricity Transmission plc //////////////////////////// 16 Scottish Hydro Electricity Transmission plc ////////////////////////// 18 Scottish Power Transmission Limited ///////////////////////////////// 20 5. Connection locations /////////////////////////////////////////////// 22 Northern Scotland projects map //////////////////////////////////////// 25 Southern Scotland projects map /////////////////////////////////////// 28 Northern England projects map /////////////////////////////////////////
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Wind Power
    CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Wind Power R�S� Amano University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Madison, WI, USA. Abstract Wind power is a well-proven and cost-effective technology and expected to be the main way in which industry responds to the Government’s targets – so becoming an important source of electricity in years to come� In this book, we have focused on basic and some advanced topics needed to understand the current situation in the win power engineering� This chapter provides introductory materials for the wind energy� Keywords: Introduction to renewable energy, wind energy in the world, fundamen- tals in wind turbines. 1 Introduction As the clean energy industry emerges from initial stage caused by the global eco- nomic downturn, it is entering a new stage of rapid change of business� The world- wide demand for energy is expected to double by the year 2030 and triple by 2050, when fossil fuels will account for no more than two-thirds of all energy consumed, compared with 79% of the energy consumed today� Traditional fossil sources such as oil, gas and coal are not renewable and cause pollution by releasing huge quanti- ties of carbon dioxide and other pollutants into the atmosphere, thereby damaging the environment in many ways, from acid rain to climate change� To help combat these problems, many states in the United States are seeking ways to use renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar and biomass� Along with its environmental and cost benefits, renewable energy is a rapidly growing industry with vast potential for economic growth
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis
    Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Annual Market Assessment Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Client Contact Michael Hahn, Patrick Gilman Award Number DE-EE0005360 Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington, MA 01803-5154 781.270.8314 www.navigant.com February 22, 2013 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Annual Market Assessment Document Number DE-EE0005360 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Michael Hahn Patrick Gilman Prepared by: Navigant Consulting, Inc. Lisa Frantzis, Principal Investigator Lindsay Battenberg Mark Bielecki Charlie Bloch Terese Decker Bruce Hamilton Aris Karcanias Birger Madsen Jay Paidipati Andy Wickless Feng Zhao Navigant Consortium Member Organizations Key Contributors American Wind Energy Association Jeff Anthony and Chris Long Great Lakes Wind Collaborative John Hummer and Victoria Pebbles Green Giraffe Energy Bankers Marie DeGraaf, Jérôme Guillet, and Niels Jongste National Renewable Energy Laboratory Eric Lantz Ocean & Coastal Consultants (a COWI company) Brent D. Cooper, P.E., Joe Marrone, P.E., and Stanley M. White, P.E., D.PE, D.CE Tetra Tech EC, Inc. Michael D. Ernst, Esq. Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Page ii Document Number DE-EE0005360 Notice and Disclaimer This report was prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. for the exclusive use of the U.S. Department of Energy – who supported this effort under Award Number DE-EE0005360. The work presented in this report represents our best efforts and judgments based on the information available at the time this report was prepared. Navigant Consulting, Inc. is not responsible for the reader’s use of, or reliance upon, the report, nor any decisions based on the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwec – Global Wind Report | Annual Market Update 2015
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2015 Opening up new markets for business “It’s expensive for emerging companies to enter new markets like China. The risk of failure is high leading to delays and high costs of sales. GWEC introduced us to the key people we needed to know, made the personal contacts on our behalf and laid the groundwork for us to come into the market. Their services were excellent and we are a terrific referenceable member and partner.” ED WARNER, CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER, SENTIENT SCIENCE Join GWEC today! www.gwec.net Global Report 213x303 FP advert v2.indd 2 8/04/16 8:37 pm TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 4 Preface 6 Global Status of Wind Power in 2015 8 Market Forecast 2016-2020 20 Australia 26 Brazil 28 Canada 30 PR China 32 The European Union 36 Egypt 38 Finland 40 France 42 Germany 44 Offshore Wind 46 India 54 Japan 56 Mexico 58 Netherlands 60 Poland 62 South Africa 64 Turkey 66 Uruguay 68 United Kingdom 70 United States 72 About GWEC 74 GWEC – Global Wind 2015 Report 3 FOREWORD 015 was a stellar year for the wind industry and for Elsewhere in Asia, India is the main story, which has now the energy revolution, culminating with the landmark surpassed Spain to move into 4th place in the global 2Paris Agreement in December An all too rare triumph of cumulative installations ranking, and had the fifth largest multilateralism, 186 governments have finally agreed on market last year Pakistan, the Philippines, Viet Nam, where we need to get to in order to protect the climate Thailand, Mongolia and now Indonesia are all ripe
    [Show full text]