DOCSLIB.ORG

Approximate Universal Relations for Neutron Stars and Quark Stars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Approximate Universal Relations for Neutron Stars and Quark Stars Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars Authors: Kent Yagi and Nicolas Yunes NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Physics Reports. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Physics Reports, VOL# 681, (March 2017). DOI# 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.03.002 Yagi, Kent , and Nicolas Yunes. "Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars." Physics Reports (March 2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.03.002. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars Kent Yagi a,b,*, Nicolás Yunes b a Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA b eXtreme Gravity Institute, Department of Physics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA Abstract Neutron stars and quark stars are ideal laboratories to study fundamental physics at supra nuclear densities and strong gravitational fields. Astrophysical observables, however, depend strongly on the star's internal structure, which is currently unknown due to uncertainties in the equation of state. Universal relations, however, exist among certain stellar observables that do not depend sensitively on the star's internal structure. One such set of relations is between the star's moment of inertia (I), its tidal Love number (Love) and its quadrupole moment (Q ), the so-called I–Love–Q relations. Similar relations hold among the star's multipole moments, which resemble the well-known black hole no-hair theo- rems. Universal relations break degeneracies among astrophysical observables, leading to a variety of applications: (i) X-ray measurements of the nuclear matter equation of state, (ii) gravitational wave measurements of the intrinsic spin of inspiraling compact objects, and (iii) gravitational and astrophysical tests of General Relativity that are independent of the equation of state. We here review how the universal relations come about and all the applications that have been devised to date. Contents 1. The ubiquity of universality ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Universality in black holes........................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Universality in non-vacuum spacetimes .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Why universality matters ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4. Layout and conventions ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars in general relativity .......................................................................................... 6 2.1. Neutron stars, quark stars and approximation schemes ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1. The structure of compact stars .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2. Useful approximations ................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2. I–Love–Q ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1. Newtonian results......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.2. Relativistic results......................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3. No-hair relations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1. Newtonian results......................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3.2. Relativistic results......................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. Extensions of universality in general relativity ...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1. Different normalizations to strengthen universality ................................................................................................................. 15 3.2. Rotation......................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1. Rapid uniform rotation................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.2.2. Differential rotation...................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.3. Magnetic fields ............................................................................................................................................................................. 19 3.4. Anisotropic pressure .................................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.5. Non-barotropic equations of state .............................................................................................................................................. 22 3.6. Dynamical tides ............................................................................................................................................................................ 22 4. Connection to other universal relations .................................................................................................................................................. 23 4.1. Multipole Love relations .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 4.1.1. No rotation .................................................................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.2. Slow rotation................................................................................................................................................................. 26 4.2. Binary love relations .................................................................................................................................................................... 27 4.3. I–Love–Q and oscillation frequencies ........................................................................................................................................ 29 4.4. I–Love–Q and compactness......................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.4.1. Numerical analysis........................................................................................................................................................ 30 4.4.2. Analytic investigation................................................................................................................................................... 31 4.5. Darwin–Radau relation ................................................................................................................................................................ 32 5. Why universality holds............................................................................................................................................................................. 33 5.1. The Newtonian limit .................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5.2. The black hole limit...................................................................................................................................................................... 35 5.3. An approximate emergent symmetry......................................................................................................................................... 36 6. I–Love–Q in modified gravity and exotic compact objects ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plasma Physics and Pulsars
    Plasma Physics and Pulsars On the evolution of compact o bjects and plasma physics in weak and strong gravitational and electromagnetic fields by Anouk Ehreiser supervised by Axel Jessner, Maria Massi and Li Kejia as part of an internship at the Max Planck Institute for Radioastronomy, Bonn March 2010 2 This composition was written as part of two internships at the Max Planck Institute for Radioastronomy in April 2009 at the Radiotelescope in Effelsberg and in February/March 2010 at the Institute in Bonn. I am very grateful for the support, expertise and patience of Axel Jessner, Maria Massi and Li Kejia, who supervised my internship and introduced me to the basic concepts and the current research in the field. Contents I. Life-cycle of stars 1. Formation and inner structure 2. Gravitational collapse and supernova 3. Star remnants II. Properties of Compact Objects 1. White Dwarfs 2. Neutron Stars 3. Black Holes 4. Hypothetical Quark Stars 5. Relativistic Effects III. Plasma Physics 1. Essentials 2. Single Particle Motion in a magnetic field 3. Interaction of plasma flows with magnetic fields – the aurora as an example IV. Pulsars 1. The Discovery of Pulsars 2. Basic Features of Pulsar Signals 3. Theoretical models for the Pulsar Magnetosphere and Emission Mechanism 4. Towards a Dynamical Model of Pulsar Electrodynamics References 3 Plasma Physics and Pulsars I. The life-cycle of stars 1. Formation and inner structure Stars are formed in molecular clouds in the interstellar medium, which consist mostly of molecular hydrogen (primordial elements made a few minutes after the beginning of the universe) and dust.
    [Show full text]
  • Negreiros Lecture II
    General Relativity and Neutron Stars - II Rodrigo Negreiros – UFF - Brazil Outline • Compact Stars • Spherically Symmetric • Rotating Compact Stars • Magnetized Compact Stars References for this lecture Compact Stars • Relativistic stars with inner structure • We need to solve Einstein’s equation for the interior as well as the exterior Compact Stars - Spherical • We begin by writing the following metric • Which leads to the following components of the Riemman curvature tensor Compact Stars - Spherical • The Ricci tensor components are calculated as • Ricci scalar is given by Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we can calculate Einstein’s equation as 휇 • Where we used a perfect fluid as sources ( 푇휈 = 푑푖푎푔(휖, 푃, 푃, 푃)) Compact Stars - Spherical • Einstein’s equation define the space-time curvature • We must also enforce energy-momentum conservation • This implies that • Where the four velocity is given by • After some algebra we get Compact Stars - Spherical • Making use of Euler’s equation we get • Thus • Which we can rewrite as Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we introduce • Which allow us to integrate one of Einstein’s equation, leading to • After some shuffling of Einstein’s equation we can write Summary so far... Metric Energy-Momentum Tensor Einstein’s equation Tolmann-Oppenheimer-Volkoff eq. Relativistic Hydrostatic Equilibrium Mass continuity Stellar structure calculation Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Recapitulando … “Feed” with diferente microscopic models Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Compare predicted properties with Observed data. Rotating Compact Stars • During its evolution, compact stars may acquire high rotational frequencies (possibly up to 500 hz) • Rotation breaks spherical symmetry, increasing the degrees of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Pulsars
    High-energy astrophysics Explore the PUL SAR menagerie Astronomers are discovering many strange properties of compact stellar objects called pulsars. Here’s how they fit together. by Victoria M. Kaspi f you browse through an astronomy book published 25 years ago, you’d likely assume that astronomers understood extremely dense objects called neutron stars fairly well. The spectacular Crab Nebula’s central body has been a “poster child” for these objects for years. This specific neutron star is a pulsar that I rotates roughly 30 times per second, emitting regular appar- ent pulsations in Earth’s direction through a sort of “light- house” effect as the star rotates. While these textbook descriptions aren’t incorrect, research over roughly the past decade has shown that the picture they portray is fundamentally incomplete. Astrono- mers know that the simple scenario where neutron stars are all born “Crab-like” is not true. Experts in the field could not have imagined the variety of neutron stars they’ve recently observed. We’ve found that bizarre objects repre- sent a significant fraction of the neutron star population. With names like magnetars, anomalous X-ray pulsars, soft gamma repeaters, rotating radio transients, and compact Long the pulsar poster child, central objects, these bodies bear properties radically differ- the Crab Nebula’s central object is a fast-spinning neutron star ent from those of the Crab pulsar. Just how large a fraction that emits jets of radiation at its they represent is still hotly debated, but it’s at least 10 per- magnetic axis. Astronomers cent and maybe even the majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Structure of Quark Stars with Magnetic Fields
    PRAMANA °c Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 67, No. 5 | journal of November 2006 physics pp. 937{949 Surface structure of quark stars with magnetic ¯elds PRASHANTH JAIKUMAR Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We investigate the impact of magnetic ¯elds on the electron distribution of the electrosphere of quark stars. For moderately strong magnetic ¯elds of B » 1013 G, quantization e®ects are generally weak due to the large number density of electrons at surface, but can nevertheless a®ect the photon emission properties of quark stars. We outline the main observational characteristics of quark stars as determined by their surface emission, and briefly discuss their formation in explosive events termed as quark-novae, which may be connected to the r-process. Keywords. Quark stars; magnetic ¯elds; nucleosynthesis. PACS Nos 26.60.+c; 24.85.+p; 97.60.Jd 1. Introduction There is a renewed interest in the theory and observation of strange quark stars, which are believed to contain, or be entirely composed of, decon¯ned quark mat- ter [1]. An observational con¯rmation of their existence would be conclusive ev- idence of quark decon¯nement at large baryon densities, an expected feature of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Furthermore, discovery of a stable bare quark star a±rms the Bodmer{Terazawa{Witten conjecture [2], that at high enough den- sity, strange quark matter, composed of up, down and strange quarks, is absolutely stable with respect to nuclear matter. This intriguing hypothesis is over three decades old, and bare quark stars are but one possible realization put forward in the intervening years.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars
    Chandra X-Ray Observatory X-Ray Astronomy Field Guide Neutron Stars Ordinary matter, or the stuff we and everything around us is made of, consists largely of empty space. Even a rock is mostly empty space. This is because matter is made of atoms. An atom is a cloud of electrons orbiting around a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons. The nucleus contains more than 99.9 percent of the mass of an atom, yet it has a diameter of only 1/100,000 that of the electron cloud. The electrons themselves take up little space, but the pattern of their orbit defines the size of the atom, which is therefore 99.9999999999999% Chandra Image of Vela Pulsar open space! (NASA/PSU/G.Pavlov et al. What we perceive as painfully solid when we bump against a rock is really a hurly-burly of electrons moving through empty space so fast that we can't see—or feel—the emptiness. What would matter look like if it weren't empty, if we could crush the electron cloud down to the size of the nucleus? Suppose we could generate a force strong enough to crush all the emptiness out of a rock roughly the size of a football stadium. The rock would be squeezed down to the size of a grain of sand and would still weigh 4 million tons! Such extreme forces occur in nature when the central part of a massive star collapses to form a neutron star. The atoms are crushed completely, and the electrons are jammed inside the protons to form a star composed almost entirely of neutrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Detection of Wormholes Carlos Sabín
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Quantum detection of wormholes Carlos Sabín We show how to use quantum metrology to detect a wormhole. A coherent state of the electromagnetic field experiences a phase shift with a slight dependence on the throat radius of a possible distant wormhole. We show that this tiny correction is, in principle, detectable by homodyne measurements Received: 16 February 2017 after long propagation lengths for a wide range of throat radii and distances to the wormhole, even if the detection takes place very far away from the throat, where the spacetime is very close to a flat Accepted: 15 March 2017 geometry. We use realistic parameters from state-of-the-art long-baseline laser interferometry, both Published: xx xx xxxx Earth-based and space-borne. The scheme is, in principle, robust to optical losses and initial mixedness. We have not observed any wormhole in our Universe, although observational-based bounds on their abundance have been established1. The motivation of the search of these objects is twofold. On one hand, the theoretical implications of the existence of topological spacetime shortcuts would entail a challenge to our understanding of deep physical principles such as causality2–5. On the other hand, typical phenomena attributed to black holes can be mimicked by wormholes. Therefore, if wormholes exist the identity of the objects in the center of the galaxies might be questioned6 as well as the origin of the already observed gravitational waves7, 8. For these reasons, there is a renewed interest in the characterization of wormholes9–11 and in their detection by classical means such as gravitational lensing12, 13, among others14.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Black Holes
    Quantum Black Holes Xavier Calmet Physics & Astronomy University of Sussex Standard Model of particle physics It is described by a quantum field theory. Like athletes, coupling constants run (with energy)…. fast or slow When does gravity become important? The Planck mass is the energy scale A grand unification? at which quantum Is there actually only gravitational effects one fundamental interaction? become important. Doing quantum gravity is challenging • We do not know how to do calculations in quantum gravity. • Unifying gravity and quantum mechanics is difficult. • One can however show a few features such a theory should have, most notably: there is a minimal length in nature (e.g. XC, M. Graesser and S. Hsu) which corresponds to the size of the quantum fluctuations of spacetime itself. • New tools/theories are needed: string theory, loop quantum gravity, noncommutative geometry, nonperturbative quantum gravity… maybe something completely different. Quantization of gravity is an issue in the high energy regime which is tough to probe experimentally Dimensional analysis: 19 MP ~10 GeV but we shall see that it does not need to be the case. Since we do not have data: thought experiments can give us some clues. Why gravity do we need to quantize gravity? One example: linearized gravity coupled to matter (described by a quantum field theory) is problematic: See talk of Claus Kiefer We actually do not even know at what energy scale quantum gravity becomes strong! Let me give you two examples TeV gravity extra-dimensions where MP is the effective Planck scale in 4-dim ADD brane world RS warped extra-dimension Running of Newton’s constant XC, Hsu & Reeb (2008) • Consider GR with a massive scalar field • Let me consider the renormalization of the Planck mass: Like any other coupling constant: Newton’s constant runs! Theoretical physics can lead to anything… even business ideas! A large hidden sector! • Gravity can be strong at 1 TeV if Newton’s constant runs fast somewhere between eV range and 1 TeV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Star Newsletter
    THE HOT STAR NEWSLETTER ? An electronic publication dedicated to A, B, O, Of, LBV and Wolf-Rayet stars and related phenomena in galaxies No. 25 December 1996 http://webhead.com/∼sergio/hot/ editor: Philippe Eenens http://www.inaoep.mx/∼eenens/hot/ [email protected] http://www.star.ucl.ac.uk/∼hsn/index.html Contents of this Newsletter Abstracts of 6 accepted papers . 1 Abstracts of 2 submitted papers . .4 Abstracts of 3 proceedings papers . 6 Abstract of 1 dissertation thesis . 7 Book .......................................................................8 Meeting .....................................................................8 Accepted Papers The Mass-Loss History of the Symbiotic Nova RR Tel Harry Nussbaumer and Thomas Dumm Institute of Astronomy, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092 Z¨urich, Switzerland Mass loss in symbiotic novae is of interest to the theory of nova-like events as well as to the question whether symbiotic novae could be precursors of type Ia supernovae. RR Tel began its outburst in 1944. It spent five years in an extended state with no mass-loss before slowly shrinking and increasing its effective temperature. This transition was accompanied by strong mass-loss which decreased after 1960. IUE and HST high resolution spectra from 1978 to 1995 show no trace of mass-loss. Since 1978 the total luminosity has been decreasing at approximately constant effective temperature. During the present outburst the white dwarf in RR Tel will have lost much less matter than it accumulated before outburst. - The 1995 continuum at λ ∼< 1400 is compatible with a hot star of T = 140 000 K, R = 0.105 R , and L = 3700 L . Accepted by Astronomy & Astrophysics Preprints from [email protected] 1 New perceptions on the S Dor phenomenon and the micro variations of five Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs) A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Galactic Nuclei: a Brief Introduction
    Active Galactic Nuclei: a brief introduction Manel Errando Washington University in St. Louis The discovery of quasars 3C 273: The first AGN z=0.158 2 <latexit sha1_base64="4D0JDPO4VKf1BWj0/SwyHGTHSAM=">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</latexit> <latexit sha1_base64="H7Rv+ZHksM7/70841dw/vasasCQ=">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</latexit> The power source of quasars • The luminosity (L) of quasars, i.e. how bright they are, can be as high as Lquasar ~ 1012 Lsun ~ 1040 W. • The energy source of quasars is accretion power: - Nuclear fusion: 2 11 1 ∆E =0.007 mc =6 10 W s g−
    [Show full text]
  • Immirzi Parameter Without Immirzi Ambiguity: Conformal Loop Quantization of Scalar-Tensor Gravity
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aberdeen University Research Archive PHYSICAL REVIEW D 96, 084011 (2017) Immirzi parameter without Immirzi ambiguity: Conformal loop quantization of scalar-tensor gravity † Olivier J. Veraguth* and Charles H.-T. Wang Department of Physics, University of Aberdeen, King’s College, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, United Kingdom (Received 25 May 2017; published 5 October 2017) Conformal loop quantum gravity provides an approach to loop quantization through an underlying conformal structure i.e. conformally equivalent class of metrics. The property that general relativity itself has no conformal invariance is reinstated with a constrained scalar field setting the physical scale. Conformally equivalent metrics have recently been shown to be amenable to loop quantization including matter coupling. It has been suggested that conformal geometry may provide an extended symmetry to allow a reformulated Immirzi parameter necessary for loop quantization to behave like an arbitrary group parameter that requires no further fixing as its present standard form does. Here, we find that this can be naturally realized via conformal frame transformations in scalar-tensor gravity. Such a theory generally incorporates a dynamical scalar gravitational field and reduces to general relativity when the scalar field becomes a pure gauge. In particular, we introduce a conformal Einstein frame in which loop quantization is implemented. We then discuss how different Immirzi parameters under this description may be related by conformal frame transformations and yet share the same quantization having, for example, the same area gaps, modulated by the scalar gravitational field. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.084011 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hole Formation the Collapse of Compact Stellar Objects to Black Holes
    Utrecht University Institute of Theoretical Physics Black Hole Formation The Collapse of Compact Stellar Objects to Black Holes Author: Michiel Bouwhuis [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. Tomislav Prokopec [email protected] February 17, 2009 Theoretical Physics Colloquium Abstract This paper attemps to prove the existence of black holes by combining obser- vational evidence with theoretical findings. First, basic properties of black holes are explained. Then black hole formation is studied. The relativistic hydrostatic equations are derived. For white dwarfs the equation of state and the Chandrasekhar limit M = 1:43M are worked out. An upper bound of M = 3:6M for the mass of any compact object is determined. These results are compared with observational evidence to prove that black holes exist. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Black Holes Basics 5 2.1 The Schwarzschild Metric . 5 2.2 Black Holes . 6 2.3 Eddington-Finkelstein Coordinates . 7 2.4 Types of Black Holes . 9 3 Stellar Collapse and Black Hole Formation 11 3.1 Introduction . 11 3.2 Collapse of Dust . 11 3.3 Gravitational Balance . 15 3.4 Equations of Structure . 15 3.5 White Dwarfs . 18 3.6 Neutron Stars . 23 4 Astronomical Black Holes 26 4.1 Stellar-Mass Black Holes . 26 4.2 Supermassive Black Holes . 27 5 Discussion 29 5.1 Black hole alternatives . 29 5.2 Conclusion . 29 2 Chapter 1 Introduction The idea of a object so heavy that even light cannot escape its gravitational well is very old. It was first considered by British amateur astronomer John Michell in 1783.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMOGENEOUS EINSTEIN METRICS on SU(N) MANIFOLDS, HOOP CONJECTURE for BLACK RINGS, and ERGOREGIONS in MAGNETISED BLACK HOLE SPACE
    HOMOGENEOUS EINSTEIN METRICS ON SU(n) MANIFOLDS, HOOP CONJECTURE FOR BLACK RINGS, AND ERGOREGIONS IN MAGNETISED BLACK HOLE SPACETIMES A Dissertation by ABID HASAN MUJTABA Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Christopher Pope Committee Members, Bhaskar Dutta Stephen Fulling Ergin Sezgin Head of Department, George R. Welch May 2013 Major Subject: Physics Copyright 2013 Abid Hasan Mujtaba ABSTRACT This Dissertation covers three aspects of General Relativity: inequivalent Einstein metrics on Lie Group Manifolds, proving the Hoop Conjecture for Black Rings, and investigating ergoregions in magnetised black hole spacetimes. A number of analytical and numerical techniques are employed to that end. It is known that every compact simple Lie Group admits a bi-invariant homogeneous Ein- stein metric. We use two ans¨atzeto probe the existence of additional inequivalent Einstein metrics on the Lie Group SU(n). We provide an explicit construction of 2k + 1 and 2k inequivalent Einstein metrics on SU(2k) and SU(2k + 1) respectively. We prove the Hoop Conjecture for neutral and charged, singly and doubly rotating black rings. This allows one to determine whether a rotating mass distribution has an event horizon, that it is in fact a black ring. We investigate ergoregions in magnetised black hole spacetimes. We show that, in general, rotating charged black holes (Kerr-Newman) immersed in an external magnetic field have ergoregions that extend to infinity near the central axis unless we restrict the charge to q = amB and keep B below a maximal value.
    [Show full text]