Violence, Community, and the Struggle for LGBTQ Justice in the Mennonite Church USA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Violence, Community, and the Struggle for LGBTQ Justice in the Mennonite Church USA Pacifist Battlegrounds: Violence, Community, and the Struggle for LGBTQ Justice in the Mennonite Church USA By Copyright 2015 Stephanie Krehbiel Submitted to the graduate degree program in American Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Randal Jelks ________________________________ Sherrie Tucker ________________________________ Ben Chappell ________________________________ Akiko Takeyama ________________________________ Marike Janzen Date Defended: April 13, 2015 The Dissertation Committee for Stephanie Krehbiel certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Pacifist Battlegrounds: Violence, Community, and the Struggle for LGBTQ Justice in the Mennonite Church USA ________________________________ Chairperson Randal Jelks Date approved: April 13, 2015 ii Abstract This dissertation focuses on the movement for LGBTQ inclusion within the Mennonite Church USA, a Christian denomination of just under 100,000 members. Mennonites are part of a nearly five century Christian tradition known as Anabaptism, known for an ethic of nonviolence. Yet Mennonite communities and institutions have been and continue to be sites of intense patriarchal and gendered interpersonal violence. While LGBTQ Mennonites and their supporters have been engaged in visible advocacy and grassroots organizing for the past forty years, they continue to struggle for recognition and acceptance within a denomination that mirrors many other U.S. Christian groups in its sharp divisions over sexual politics. Mennonites’ polity tends towards congregational rather then hierarchical arrangements, and church policies are determined and debated at congregational, regional, and national levels through processes known as “discernment.” Discernment is seen as a peaceful approach to settling communal conflict. However, LGBTQ Mennonites often experience such processes as abusive and violent. Thus Mennonite conflicts over LGBTQ inclusion are also struggles over how violence should be defined. This study draws on interviews, oral histories, ethnographic fieldwork, and archival evidence from the past four decades, arguing that LGBTQ Mennonites and their allies have played an integral role in subverting and revealing the hidden abuses of power enabled by Mennonite communal discourses. It brings together a feminist and queer theory-based analysis of discursive violence with a critique of de-historicized multiculturalism in institutional life. iii Acknowledgements In the years that I have spent working on this dissertation, more people than I can possibly name have had an impact on its shape, scope, and arguments. My advisor, Randal Jelks, took interest in this project almost immediately upon my arrival at University of Kansas, and from the beginning his encouragement helped me to proceed with the confidence that my work mattered. This study has benefitted tremendously from his deep and expansive knowledge of U.S. Christianity, his commitment to scholarship with conscience, and his tireless insistence that religious belief be taken seriously as a factor in social change. My other committee members also had substantial roles in shaping my dissertation. Conversations with Ben Chappell about the theoretical underpinnings and ethical motivations of my work always helped me pull myself out of the inevitable ruts of the writing process; every chapter owes a debt to his thoughtful guidance. Sherrie Tucker taught me to be an interdisciplinary scholar, to trust my hunches, and to weather the backlash. Akiko Takeyama was invaluable in helping me to keep at least one foot grounded in women’s studies. Marike Janzen, while technically serving as my outside member, was anything but; her critical approach to her own Mennonite experiences has challenged and inspired me at several key moments in my process. David Roediger has also been a generous mentor and source of career guidance, as well as an incredibly forgiving boss for a research assistant in the throes of dissertating. The Hall Center for the Humanities made it possible for me to write without teaching during a key year on the project. Thanks especially to Victor Bailey and Sally Utech for your support of my work. iv Tami Albin is the superhero librarian behind this project. Very few graduate students benefit from the kind of interdisciplinary research support that I’ve had from Tami. I know how lucky I am. Liam Lair and Ashley Mog have been the best writing partners I could possibly imagine. All three have been indispensible friends to me. Liam, Ashley, Tami: I can’t imagine my life without the three of you, let alone this dissertation. Many friends sustained and cared for me in countless ways for the duration of this project. Thanks in particular to Oniel Chambers, Ellie Vainker, Cat Jacquet, Ruth Harder, and Caleb Lazaro. I also want to thank Jesse Graber, Lora Enfield, Gaywyn Moore, Rebecca Barrett-Fox, Sarah Weber, Phil Graber, Andrea Yoder Graber, Susan Gaeddert, and Katie Hastings Lewis, for friendship and much more. My fellow graduate students in KU AMS have been a fantastic group and source of support: a particular shout out to Chris Robinson, Sean Malone, Hai Cao, and Pete Williams. Jennifer Yoder and Carol Wise, in addition to serving as indispensible sources of knowledge for my study, were pillars of solidarity and activist love when the Mennonite world felt like more than I could handle. I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude all to the organizers, advocates, and activists of Pink Menno and Brethren Mennonite Council on LGBT Interests, both past and present, particularly the following: Lisa Pierce, Patrick Ressler, Luke Miller, Justin Yoder, Christian Parks, Arthur Kauffman, Adam Hostetter, Kirsten Freed, Katie Hochstetler, Annabeth Roeschley, Christian Yoder, John Linscheid, Tim Nafziger, Wilma Harder, Larry E. Miller, and Su Flickinger. Special thanks to Amy Short for sharing the phenomenal source material of the BMC Oral History Project, and to Frank Trnka, for giving me access to his amazing attic archive and BMC drag photos, as well as for valuable elder guidance. I first met Audrey Roth Kraybill in the convention v center hallway on my first evening in Pittsburgh and within an hour we were both crying and drinking beer. She has been my fiercest supporter ever since. Do not mess with the Pink Menno Mama Bear. Thanks also to Hugo Saucedo, Tyler Zabriskie, Donna Sider, Jonathan Miller, Stephen Wilcox, Fidele Lumeya, Doris Bartel, Charles Cristano, Sara Person, Harold Miller, Leann Toews, Joanna Shenk, Heidi Regier Kreider, Hannah Heinzekehr, Glen Geissinger, and Arlene Geissinger. While not all your names appear in this text, all of your perspectives have informed and shaped it. I have learned a great deal from the Mennonite pastors who have taken social and professional risks in support of queer inclusion. Special thanks to Joanna Harader, Ruth Harder, and Cynthia Lapp, for your knowledge and for your friendships. Many thanks also to Sarah Klaassen, Michelle Burkholder, Ron Adams, Theda Good, Megan Ramer, Joetta Schlabach, and Joel Miller. My final chapter on sexualized violence would have been impossible without the close and regular counsel and friendship of Ruth Krall, Barbra Graber, Carolyn Heggen, Lisa Schirch, and Rachel Halder. Thanks also to Rachel Waltner Goossen, Regina Shands Stoltzfus, Felipe Hinojosa, and Gerald Mast. I owe all of you a substantial intellectual debt, and your personal generosity to me has meant more than I can say. I also thank Clarence Rempel, Elizabeth Soto Albrecht, Samuel Schrag, Isaac Villegas, and Ervin Stutzman. All of you have given time and energy to me in one way or another, and while I know that not all of you will welcome or agree with my interpretations, I appreciate your willingness to engage with me. vi My final and most heartfelt thanks goes to my family. It is impossible to trace all the ways that the influence of my parents, Dwight and Bonnie Krehbiel, is present in this text. Their love and support has been constant and unconditional. Thanks also to Arleen Cook and Darrell Wiens, Galen Cook-Wiens, Donna and Richard Zerger, Twila and Ed Wiens, and Randy and Myrna Krehbiel, all of whom have been constant in their interest in and support of this project. Finally, most of all, to my spouse and partner Eric Cook- Wiens: your faith in me is the reason this project exists. I love you. And to my cats, Billy and Xander: you are my heart, and I blame you for all the typos. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................. 24 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................. 65 CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................................... 105 CHAPTER 4 ............................................................................................................................... 134 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................... 181 BIBLIOGRAPHY .....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Clarification on Mennonite Church USA Polity and the Role of The
    1 2 Clarification on Mennonite Church USA Polity and the 3 Role of the Membership Guidelines of Mennonite Church USA 4 5 For consideration by the Delegate Assembly, May 2022, Kansas City, Missouri 6 7 Background 8 1. The Membership Guidelines for the formation of Mennonite Church USA were created to define the 9 expectations for member conferences as they joined MC USA. Denominations had differing polity 10 around the roles of area conferences that led to how each denomination handled pastors’ officiating 11 same-sex marriages. 12 2. In 1999, the Membership Guidelines failed to pass due to a lack of clarity around the status of dual 13 conference congregations disciplined by one denomination but not the other for allowing openly gay 14 members. 15 3. For integration to move forward, section III was added to the Membership Guidelines to clarify MC 16 USA’s expectations for area conferences on these matters. Both delegate bodies approved these 17 guidelines in 2001. 18 4. The Membership Guidelines for the formation of MC USA were created to facilitate the integration of 19 Mennonite Church and General Conference into a new denomination. The guidelines were to be 20 reviewed for their ongoing usefulness in six years (2007). 21 5. In 2007, the Constituency Leaders Council (CLC) began a review of the Membership Guidelines. Still, 22 conflict over gay persons in the church made the review process difficult, and it didn’t move forward. 23 6. In 2013, the Executive Board (EB) submitted a revised version of the guidelines to the delegate body 24 as an administrative update.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Data 23
    # of Congregations 2000 Population # of Congregations per 100,000 VA 7,736 7104587 108.89 Pittsylvania 125 61785 202.31 Danville City 64 48240 132.67 Caswell 47 23,550 199.58 # of Congregations per 100,000 250.00 202.31 199.58 200.00 132.67 150.00 108.89 100.00 # of Congregations per 100,000 50.00 0.00 VA Pittsylvania Danville City Caswell *The “Unadjusted Totals” come from the 1990 and 2000 data collected by representatives of the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). While quite comprehensive, this data excludes most of the historically African‐ http://www.thearda.com/mapsReports/reports/sta American denominations and some other major groups. As a result, these numbers will be an underestimate of the total adherence rate, particularly in areas with a large African‐American population. The 2000 data included 149 religious group and the final results are published in Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States 2000. Copyright © 2002, All rights reserved. The 1990 data included 132 groups and the final results are published in Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1990 Copyright © 1990, All rights reserved. Published by Glenmary Research Center, 1312 Fifth Ave., North, Nashville, TN 37208. www.glenmary.org/grc [More information on the data collection] **The “Adjusted Totals” include all adherents in the denominations counted by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and estimates adherent totals for the historically African‐American denominations
    [Show full text]
  • Advent at Home 2020 We Wait for Jesus
    We Wait for Jeus Advent 2020 to Epiphany 2021 At Home Worship Guide Advent to Epiphany At Home 2020 November 29, 2020 through January 6, 2021 Written by Talashia Keim Yoder Edited by Shana Peachey Boshart and Wil LaVeist Designed by Caleb Gingerich This material may be reproduced and adapted by Mennonite Church Canada and Mennonite Church USA congregations free of charge. If making changes, please add an explanatory note to acknowledge adaptations and credit those who made the changes. We would love to hear how you are using this material, and we are interested in your suggestions for making it more useful and accessible. Contact: Shana Peachey Boshart, Denominational Minister for Faith Formation, Mennonite Church USA 574-523-3070 [email protected] MennoniteUSA.org/FF © Talashia Keim Yoder and Mennonite Church USA Page 2 CONTENTS 4 Introduction 6 The Advent Wreath 8 Advent Week 1, November 29: Hope 10 Advent Week 2, December 6: Peace 13 Advent Week 3, December 13: Joy 15 Advent Week 4, December 20: Love 17 Christmas Day, December 25: Jesus 19 Christmas Week 2, January 3, 2021 21 Epiphany Day, January 6, 2021 Page 3 ADVENT AT HOME 2020 WE WAIT FOR JESUS Introducing Advent What is Advent? • The word “Advent” comes from the Latin word adventus, which means “coming” or “visit.” In the season with this name, we keep in mind both “advents” of Christ: the first in Bethlehem and the second yet to come. • A time to remember we need a Savior. Without divine help, we are unable to live in peace with God, ourselves or each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae: Jonathan Tran
    Curriculum Vitae: Jonathan Tran Contact Information & Personal Details Address Baylor University Department of Religion One Bear Place #97284 Waco, TX 76798-7284 Tel. (O) +1 254 710 6723 (C) +1 678 756 1073 E-mail [email protected] Education Education University of California at Riverside (grad. 1994) Qualification B.A., Phi Beta Kappa, Political Science Education Duke University, Divinity School (grad. 2002) Qualification M.Div., summa cum laude Education Duke University, Department of Religion (grad. 2006) Qualification Ph.D., Theology and Ethics (Director: Stanley Hauerwas) Academic Employment History Institution Baylor University Positions George W. Baines Professor of Religion (2018-Present) Associate Professor of Religion (2012-Present) Faculty Steward, Honors Residential College (2015-2018) Assistant Professor of Religion (2006-2012) Key activities Department of Religion Graduate Faculty (2009-Present) University Tenure Committee (2012-2015); Chair (2014-2015) Affiliate Faculty: Medical Humanities; Baylor Center for Christian Philosophy Significant & Endowed Lectures 2021 Fuller Theological Seminary AAPI Chapel Lecture 2017 Baylor University Fall Academic Convocation, “Finding Love in College” 2017 Baylor University Collins Outstanding Professor Award Address, “My Life with Students: Wittgensteinian Thoughts on Baylor Students” 2016 Fellowship for Protestant Ethics Inaugural Keynote Lectures, “The Case for and of Protestant Christian Ethics” 2015 Kendrick-Poerschke Memorial Lecture at Furman University, “Drone Dreaming Along the Border: Trump, Immigration, and Rhetorics of Nostalgia” 2015 Asian American Heritage Lectures at Seattle Pacific University • 1 2014 Leuschner Lectures, Seventh & James Baptist Church, “The End of Words: Bodies, Animals and Language” (October 22, October 29, November 5, and November 12) 2013 “The Difference Christ Makes: Celebrating the Life, Work, and Friendship of Stanley Hauerwas” Plenary Address at Duke Divinity School, Duke University, “Anne and the Difficulty of Hauerwas’ Church” 2012 The T.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Mennonite Church USA and Mennonite Church Canada CONGREGATIONAL and PASTORAL PRIORITIES
    Mennonite Church USA and Mennonite Church Canada CONGREGATIONAL and PASTORAL PRIORITIES NOTE: This worksheet is for use in combination with the 2020 Ministerial Leadership Information (MLI) form. If a pastoral candidate completed an MLI before January 2020, congregations should use the earlier Twenty Pastoral Area/Tasks form, also on the website at mennoniteusa.org/resource/ministerial-transitions-committee-packet/. This worksheet is filled out by both pastors and congregations to be used in the search process. It is designed to identify the perceived needs/priorities of the congregation and the priorities and vision of pastoral candidates. It is an initial screen that helps identify general agreement between what the church is seeking and the priorities a pastor has for their ministry. It can also serve as a useful discussion guide between a pastoral candidate and a search committee/congregation. The questions are categorized using the six core competencies of Mennonite Church USA and Mennonite Church Canada. • Pastoral Candidates: Focus on how you would prioritize your time and energy in pastoral ministry. • Congregations: Focus on what your perceived needs and expectations are for the pastor you are seeking to hire and how they may use their time and energy. • Search Committees: Page 4 includes more information for interpreting the results. Instructions for both a congregation and a pastor Click (electronic) or check (hard copy) the box to indicate your answer for each priority. Make sure you select only one box for each priority. 1☐ 2☐ 3☒ 4☐ 5☐ 6☐ 7☐ Mark only six (6) in the high range Mark only twelve (12) in the medium range Mark only six (6) in the low range Congregational and Pastoral Priorities Low Medium High 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Biblical Story 1 Pastor prepares and delivers Bible-based sermons.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Mennonite Church USA and Its Current Realignment Mennonite Church USA Was Formed on February 1, 2002, By
    A Short History of Mennonite Church USA and Its Current Realignment Mennonite Church USA was formed on February 1, 2002, by the joining of two Mennonite denominations: Mennonite Church (organized as Mennonite General Conference in 1898) and the General Conference Mennonite Church (founded in 1860). The intersection of Mennonites in alternative service during World War II led to increasing cooperation of the two Mennonite bodies, most notably in the partnership of Mennonite Biblical Seminary and Goshen Biblical Seminary as Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminaries in 1958. Subsequently, many new urban churches affiliated with both denominations and carried dual memberships. The two denominations held their first joint session in Bethlehem, PA in 1983 and resolved to form an Integration Exploration Committee. To prepare the way, Confession of ​ Faith in a Mennonite Perspective was adopted in 1995 in Wichita, KS along with a new vision statement: ​ God calls us to be followers of Jesus Christ and, by the power of the Holy Spirit, to grow as communities of grace, joy and peace, so that God's healing and hope flow through us to the world. The focus of the new denomination was on being missional – seeing where God is at work and joining God in that redemptive work in your community. “God invites us; Jesus sends us; and the Holy Spirit empowers us to share the message and ministry of reconciliation through Christ’s death and resurrection.” New agencies were created to provide resources for pastors and churches and to extend God’s kingdom across the street and around the world. ● Mennonite Mission Network provides service opportunities for young and old through Mennonite Voluntary Service, Service Adventure, SOOP, Youth Venture and International Ministries.
    [Show full text]
  • Organizational Strategy Culture and Structure
    Organizational Strategy Culture and Structure for Mennonite Church USA 2001 - 2011 January 30, 2001 Prepared by the Transformation Team Tim Burkholder, Ron Byler, Donella Clemens, Jim Harder, Miriam Martin, Dwight McFadden, Jim Schrag, Karl Sommers, George Stoltzfus, Ted Stuckey CONTENTS Page(s) Preface ...................................................................................................................1 Part I: Organizational strategy of Mennonite Church USA........................2-11 Biblical and theological understandings.......................................................2-3 Vision .............................................................................................................. 4 Mission and role.............................................................................................. 5 Societal and cultural context (2001) • Challenges to the church............................................................................ 6 • Internal strengths and limitations of the church......................................... 7 Core strategies..............................................................................................8-9 Goals................................................................................................................ 9 Imagining the future: 2001 to 2011..........................................................10-11 Part II: Culture and structure of Mennonite Church USA .......................12-16 Primary relationships....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Winnipeg Regional Mennonite-Catholic Dialogue
    Minutes Winnipeg Mennonite-Catholic Dialogue, Meeting No. 32 Meeting held on 19 January 2011 at the Fort Garry Mennonite Church Present: Paul Doerksen, Michelle Gallant, Helmut Harder, Richard Lebrun, John Long, Luis Melo, Ron Penner, Donna Peters-Small, Lynda Trenholm, and Nancy Wood. 1. Introduction – Helmut began by welcoming new participants to the dialogue and reporting that Adolf Ens, Henry Loewen, Janet Kozak, and Joe Langan have dropped out of the group since our last meeting, and noted that Dora Dueck, an ongoing member was away visiting family. He then gave a brief explanation of the history of the group. Round of Introductions: Helmut noted that he and Luis had “invented” the group ten years ago. He had been involved in the international Catholic-Mennonite dialogue, through which he had gotten to know James Puglisi, S.A. (who was involved with Luis’ doctoral thesis in Rome). Thinking that he should be doing something about Mennonite Catholic dialogue in Winnipeg, he contacted Luis. Helmut said that he was from southern Ontario, that he had taught at the Canadian Mennonite Bible College (now Canadian Mennonite University), served as general secretary of Mennonite Church Canada, and that his wife is a musician. They had one daughter who passed away, and two married sons. Richard is a retired prof (history, University of Manitoba, St. Paul’s College), married more than 56 years, with six children, nine grandchildren (one deceased), and nine great- grandchildren. He has also been a member of this group since the beginning, and is active in St. Ignatius Parish. Lynda is a pastoral associate at St.
    [Show full text]
  • A Believers Church Perspective. by John Howard Yoder. Gayle Gerber Koontz and Andy Alexis-Baker, Eds
    BOOK REVIEWS Theology of Mission: A Believers Church Perspective. By John Howard Yoder. Gayle Gerber Koontz and Andy Alexis-Baker, eds. Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic. 2014. Pp. 432. $45. In his writings on the Psalms, Walter Brueggemann suggests that the psalmists lead us through a process of ‚orientation, disorientation and new orientation.‛1 I have found Brueggemann’s comments helpful in guiding me through the recent discussions surrounding John Howard Yoder’s sexual misconduct. Yoder has provided me—as he has with so many others—my plumb line ‚orientation‛ to the world. As Wilbert R. Shenk’s introduction point outs, Yoder’s vision and theological commitments were instrumental in shaping the work of Mennonite Board of Missions among African Independent Churches in Cote d’Ivoire, West Africa, where my parents served as missionaries and where I grew up. As a young adult, I attended and was baptized at Prairie St. Mennonite Church—the congregation Yoder called home for many years. And as a student at Fuller Seminary, Yoder’s writings have been, and continue to be, some of the most powerful and formative in shaping my missiological grid. Given Yoder’s influence in my own life, I now find myself experiencing a period of ‚disorientation.‛ I am baffled by Yoder’s destructive tendencies and wonder what should have been done in terms of accountability. Like the psalmists, I am trying to get to a place of ‚reorientation,‛ one that narrates how God rescues us from sin in a decisive way and that includes experiencing God’s grace, peace, and love, trusting that it will lead to reconciliation with Yoder’s legacy.2 While John Howard Yoder is best known for his work on issues of war and peace, the editors of this volume note that the theology of mission preoccupied him as a scholar, teacher, missionary, and ecumenical dialogue partner for most of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2019 Enrollment Data Disaggregated
    ATS ENROLLMENT 2019 ENROLLMENT SUMMARY OF STUDENTS BY RACE AND GENDER FALL DATA WESTERN SEMINARY Respondent Reid A. Kisling Vice-President of Student Development | Title Chief Information and Effectiveness Officer Phone 503-517-1820 Email [email protected] PART A - ENROLLMENTS FOR FALL REPORT PERIOD RACIAL / Basic Programs Oriented Toward Ministerial Leadership ETHNIC CATEGORIES MDiv MRE/MCE/MA in MCM/MSM MA in _____ MPS/MAPS RelEd/CE (Special) Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Visa or 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Nonresident Alien Black 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 Non-Hispanic American Indian Alaskan Native or 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inuit Asian or 25 0 0 0 0 0 15 26 0 0 Pacific Islander Hispanic 15 0 0 0 0 0 5 11 0 0 White 132 21 0 0 0 0 64 103 0 0 Non-Hispanic Multiracial 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 Not Available 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 HEAD COUNT 178 24 0 0 0 0 92 155 0 0 SUBTOTAL Men & Women Men & Women Men & Women Men & Women Men & Women Head Count 202 0 0 247 0 Credit Hours 1193 0 0 1537 0 FTE Data 119.3 0.0 0.0 153.7 0.0 LEGEND: Approved degree Unapproved degree Auto calculated field ATS ENROLLMENT 2019 ENROLLMENT SUMMARY OF STUDENTS BY RACE AND GENDER FALL DATA PART B - ENROLLMENTS FOR FALL REPORT PERIOD RACIAL / Basic Programs Advanced Programs Oriented Toward Ministerial Leadership ETHNIC Oriented Toward CATEGORIES General Theological Studies MA/MAR/MTS/ DMin DMiss DEdMin/EdD DMA/DCM Doctor in _____ MARS/MATS (Special) Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Visa or 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Nonresident Alien Black
    [Show full text]
  • The Article Title: This Is the Title of the Article)
    Princeton Theological Review Vol. 19, No. 1 | Spring 2016 Prolegomena 3 CHRIS WAKS The Violent Shadow 5 Considering John Howard Yoder’s Sexual Misconduct from a Jungian Psychological Perspective SARAH BIXLER Catholic Ecclesiology and Hans Urs von Balthasar 21 The Unity-in-Difference of the Marian and Petrine Principles of the Church MATTHEW KUHNER The Deceitful Savior and the Emasculated King 39 Heterosexist Violence in Judges 3:12–30 DAVID B. SMITH Book Reviews 51 About the Princeton Theological Review 59 Prolegomena CHRIS WAKS Executive Editor, Princeton Theological Review “Peace is a deeper reality than violence,” writes Stanley Hauerwas in his memoir Hannah’s Child, “but it takes some getting used to.”1 If peace does in fact take some getting used to, it is because of the countless acts of violence we hear about today. We hear about wars happening in neighboring parts of the world, and many feel warred upon in their own homes. Yet, violence does not always come on such a grand scale. As Christians we must also wrestle with the violence of the biblical text. Divine wrath, Israel’s conquests, and the Crucifixion are things that Christians must wrestle with. This issue of the Princeton Theological Review continues on its trajectory of offering a resource that intersects the practical and the theoretical, the Church and the academy. Scholars were challenged to think how their discipline speaks towards issues of violence for the Church proper. While one issue cannot, and does not, cover every facet of violence in this issue, these essays can serve as a contribution to the conversation imaginative look at what it means for the Church to think about and speak about violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Participation, Perfection, and Political Discipleship: the Christological Bases of Mission
    Participation, Perfection, and Political Discipleship: The Christological Bases of Mission by Nate Kerr I I want to talk about some the theological problems associated with the idea of “Christian mission.” That is, I am going to talk about mission at, at least, one remove and this will inevitably be unsatisfactory. I have suggested in my subtitle that I will be doing this by questioning what precisely are the Christological “bases” of mission. But for the most part, I will be spending a good deal of time just talking about Jesus, and what it means to follow him. This, too, I’m guessing, will inevitably register a certain amount of dissatisfaction. Of course, I think this is as it should be. I am wholly in agreement in the end with the view that mission is the heart of the Christian life, that mission is the very matter of this thing we call “discipleship.” But what I want to say about this – and I’m not sure I will say it convincingly – is that if we are going to make serious sense of the idea that the Christian life is mission we are going to have to think more rigorously than ever mission as action rooted in and living from apocalyptic irruption of God’s reign in Jesus of Nazareth. All talk of “mission” is going to have to take its meaning and point from the “apocalyptic historicity” of Jesus Christ, the reality of which is the stark concreteness and visibility of that cruciform, suffering love which the Seer of Revelation refers us always back to in his talk of the resurrection of a slain lamb.
    [Show full text]