Risky Business 

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risky Business  RECOMMENDATIONS As part of its overhaul of UK financial 6. The Financial Services Authority should regulation, the government should ensure launch a full investigation into the findings that the listings regime for the London of this report, specifically the relationship Stock Exchange and oversight of companies between Kazakhmys plc’s senior by the Financial Services Authority and its management and President Nazarbayev of successors are significantly tightened. Kazakhstan, in order to determine whether this could materially affect the company. FOR THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY FOR KAZAKHMYS PLC 7. The company should make public 1. Any company wishing to list on the London disclosures which fully address all the Stock Exchange should disclose the matters raised in this report, including: ultimate beneficial owners of its shares for the five years prior to the time of its listing. • the relationship between its senior management and President Nazarbayev, 2. Senior managers or board members • the issue of political donations to the of such a company should disclose ruling party of Kazakhstan, any relationships with government • the sale of an aircraft to the presidential officials which could materially affect the fleet of Kazakhstan, company, explaining the nature of these • the reasons for the appointment of Bolat relationships and their potential impact. Nazarbayev to the board of Kazakhmys in August 2004, 3. Any research carried out on companies • the reason why the company was sent by their sponsors before listing should be President Nazarbayev’s bill from the verified by a third party to check for errors Lanesborough Hotel in 2006. or omissions. 8. The company should increase to at least 4. Listed companies that operate in the 50% plus one share the percentage of oil, gas and mining sectors should be shares the company sells on the market, required to publicly disclose all the so that the majority of the company payments that they make to foreign is outside of the control of its senior governments, whether in cash or in kind, managers and the Kazakh government on a country-by-country basis. until the above matters are clarified by the company and the FSA. Alternatively, 5. The UK should discard the “comply or Vladimir Kim should step down as the explain” model of corporate governance executive chairman of Kazakhmys plc and instead should enforce compliance in and a new wholly independent chairman listed companies. should be appointed. Front Cover: stock broker photograph REUTERS/Stringer Russia. Coal miners in Kazakhstan REUTERS/Arko Datta. Inside cover: Proggie/Creative Commons Back cover detail Scott Barbour/Getty Images GLOBAL WITNESS | JULY 2010 | RISKY BUSINESS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RIskY BUSINEss Reuters THE FINANCIAL COLLAPSE The near-collapse of the global financial natural resource-rich countries where the HAS RAISED NEW QUESTIONS system has brought home to investors rule of law can be overridden by corrupt ABOUT CORPORATE RISK. the urgent need to understand the true government officials. So investors in oil and picture of risks facing their investments. mining have to be sure that they have all The crisis has prompted deep thinking of the information they need in order to about whether the current regulations for properly assess these risks. They also need financial markets are rigorous enough to to be sure that the regulatory regime and ensure that investors have the information the regulators of securities markets are that they need to assess risk, and to strong enough to address the risk that oil protect the public interest in securities and mining companies may be subject to markets being efficient, orderly and fair. interference from corrupt foreign officials. Few sectors of the economy are as risky In recent years, mining companies from the as the oil and mining industries, which former Soviet Union, a region both rich in often make significant investments in natural resources and notorious for high 2 GLOBAL WITNESS | JULY 2010 | RISKY BUSINESS PRESIDENT NAZARBAYEV (LEFT) OPENS THE DAY’S TRADING AT THE LONDON StOCK EXCHANGE WHILE ON AN OFFICIAL VISIT TO THE UK IN 2006. Scott Barbour/Getty Images levels of corruption, have gained listings • Global Witness believes that Kazakhmys on the main market of the London Stock plc’s listing prospectus may not have Exchange. The first of these companies provided certain information that would was Kazakhmys plc, a copper mining have been necessary for an individual company operating predominantly in the to make a fully informed decision about Central Asian nation of Kazakhstan. investing in the company. As this report will explain, Kazakhmys plc’s listing Kazakhmys is a member of the prestigious prospectus omitted potentially key FTSE 100 share index, meaning that information about the biographies of institutional investors such as pension its senior managers and its beneficial funds which hold the savings of ordinary ownership. Global Witness has also citizens are exposed to its performance. discovered discrepancies in the reporting of its shareholding structure A company intending to list must issue a before the company’s incorporation in prospectus for potential investors. Listing the UK and subsequent listing (see p23). regulations state that this prospectus must provide information that is “necessary to • These gaps in the prospectus matter enable investors to make an informed because, as this report will also show, the assessment of the assets and liabilities, company faces allegations from numerous financial position, profits and losses and Kazakh sources, some of them former prospects of the issuer.”1 Since investors members of the country’s ruling elite, that rely on the prospectus to assess the risks senior executives of the company (who of investing in a company, it is crucial that are also its controlling shareholders) owe the information in this document is as their positions to the country’s autocratic comprehensive and impartial as possible. head of state, President Nursultan Nazarbayev (see Chapters 4-8). GLOBAL WITNESS | JULY 2010 | RISKY BUSINESS 3 • These allegations cannot be proven primarily in the interests of the ruling beyond reasonable doubt but have been family and its associates. Members of voiced by sources from various spheres Nazarbayev’s family are reportedly of Kazakh life – politics, civil society worth billions of dollars6 and hold senior and journalism. They need to be taken positions in state businesses.7 As recent seriously because they raise legitimate events in neighbouring Kyrgyzstan show, concerns that President Nazarbayev kleptocracies can lead to instability, may be able to unduly influence the disorder and ethnic violence, as citizens decisions taken by the company, remain poor while the elite get richer. should he choose, in a way that may be detrimental to other shareholders. They Against this background, it becomes all also imply a risk that, should Nazarbayev the more important to ascertain what ever be replaced by a political rival, due diligence was done on Kazakhmys the close association of Kazakhmys’ plc by regulators before the decision was senior executives with Nazarbayev made to allow the company to list. The himself could lead to punitive actions London Stock Exchange is regulated by by a successor government that would the Financial Services Authority (FSA). damage the interests of the company However, when Global Witness turned to and its shareholders. Global Witness has the FSA with a Freedom of Information also found evidence which appears to request on this subject, the request show a closer relationship between the was refused on the grounds that it was company and the government than has not in the public interest to reveal such been disclosed (see Chapter 10). information. But as this report will show, the public interest clearly requires greater The political risks of an investment in a transparency than the FSA has provided. Kazakh-based company should not be underestimated. Nazarbayev has been Global Witness also sent Kazakhmys plc a set president for the last 20 years and was of detailed questions about the allegations recently granted by his parliament the title detailed in this report. The company of “the leader of the nation”, which gives him declined to answer individual questions but immunity from prosecution2 despite the said: “As you can appreciate, the process fact that he was accused of receiving bribes in the 1990s from foreign oil companies. This scandal, dubbed Kazakhgate, led to an ongoing trial in the United States of an American businessman who is alleged to have paid US$78 million in bribes to two top Kazakh officials.3 As Global Witness detailed in its 2004 report, Time for Transparency, court filings indicate that one of these officials was President Nazarbayev himself.4 Little has changed in Kazakhstan since then to suggest that the risk of corruption has abated and the US State Department has continued to voice concerns over the dominance of Kazakhstan’s ruling elite.5 Indeed, Kazakhstan shows signs of being a ‘kleptocracy’ – a country run 4 GLOBAL WITNESS | JULY 2010 | RISKY BUSINESS the financial markets, these responses are simply not adequate. The Kazakhmys case flags wider issues that need to be addressed by securities market regulators. Kazakhmys plc is the first company from the former Soviet Union to list on London’s main market. The risk in such countries where the rule of law is weak is that companies will be subject to undue pressure from ruling elites seeking favours, payments or even influence over management, to the detriment of shareholders. Investors need to be confident that they have full information about the political risks facing companies that operate in such countries. They need to be sure that a company is not being unduly influenced Alastair Grant-Pool/Getty Images from behind the scenes, and that its financial relationships with governments NAZARBAYEV WITH undertaken to prepare the [company are not contributing to corruption.
Recommended publications
  • Nurzhan Subkhanberdin, Accused Aliyev of Organizing Death Squads to Murder Prominent Businessmen in Kazakhstan in 2005 and 2006 Without Nazarbayev’S Knowledge
    KAZAKHSTAN AND TURKMENISTAN: A Look at Political and Regulatory Environments April 30, 2009 1 STRATFOR 700 Lavaca Street, Suite 900 Austin, TX 78701 Tel: 1-512-744-4300 www.stratfor.com KAZAKHSTAN AND TURKMENISTAN: A Look at Political and Regulatory Environments Kazakhstan Country Overview Since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, Kazakhstan has been the most important of the Central Asian states. It is the largest, most resource-rich of the region’s five countries and tends to serve as a bellwether for the region’s politics. Kazakhstan is strategically and geographically the middleman between its fellow Central Asian states (all of which it borders except Tajikistan) and Russia and China. With an estimated 100 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 27 billion barrels of oil, Kazakhstan boasts more energy reserves than all four of the other Central Asian countries combined. Kazakhstan was the first Central Asian country in which Westerners seriously began developing oil and natural gas wealth after the Soviet collapse. Because of this, Kazakhstan has received more foreign direct investment than any other former Soviet state (including Russia). And most other Central Asian states with energy resources — Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, for example — must traverse Kazakhstan to reach their customers, whether those customers are Russia, China or Europe, making Kazakhstan essential to any outsider with designs on the region. But its geographic location and size have proved to be a mixed blessing. Kazakhstan is roughly one-third the size of the lower 48 U.S. states, but has only 5 percent of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Businessmen V. Investigators: Who Is Responsible for the Poor Russian Investment Climate?
    BUSINESSMEN V. INVESTIGATORS: WHO IS ReSPONSIBLE FOR THE POOR RUSSIAN INVESTMENT CLIMATE? Dmitry Gololobov, University of Westminster (London, UK) This article aims to examine the extent to which Russian investigations into economic and financial crimes are influenced by such factors as systemic problems with Russian gatekeepers, the absence of a formal corporate whistle-blowing mechanism and the continuous abuse of the law by the Russian business community. The traditional critical approach to the quality and effectiveness of Russian economic and financial investigations does not produce positive results and needs to be reformulated by considering the opinions of entrepreneurs. The author considers that forcing Russian entrepreneurs, regardless of the size of their business, to comply with Russian laws and regulations may be a more efficient way to develop the business environment than attempting to gradually improve the Russian judicial system. It is also hardly possible to expect the Russian investigatory bodies to investigate what are effectively complex economic and financial crimes in the almost complete absence of a developed whistle-blowing culture. Such a culture has greatly contributed to the success of widely-publicised corporate and financial investigations in the United States and Europe. The poor development of the culture of Russian gatekeepers and the corresponding regulatory environment is one more significant factor that permanently undermines the effectiveness of economic investigations and damages the investment climate. Key words: Russia; investigation; economic crime; gatekeepers; whistleblowing. 1. Introduction The aim of this article is to analyse the ongoing conflict between Russian investigators and the Russian business community, and to make one more attempt at answering the long-standing question regarding how a satisfactory balance between the interests of effective investigation and the protection of the business community can be reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy 2013 Human Rights Report
    ITALY 2013 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Italy is a multi-party parliamentary democracy with a bicameral parliament consisting of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. The constitution vests executive authority in the Council of Ministers, headed by a prime minister, whose official title is President of the Council. The President of the Republic, who is the head of state, nominates the prime minister after consulting with the leaders of all political parties in parliament. International observers considered the national parliamentary elections February 24-25 free and fair. The law requires the government maintain civilian control over all security forces. Civilian authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over the security forces, and there were some reports security forces committed human rights abuses. Principal human rights problems included substandard living conditions in detention centers for undocumented mixed migrant populations, governmental corruption, societal prejudice, and municipal government policies permitting the mistreatment of Roma, which exacerbated their social exclusion and restricted their access to education, health care, employment, and other social services. Other human rights problems included excessive and abusive use of force by police in some cases, overcrowded prisons, the continued incarceration of pretrial detainees with convicted criminals, an inefficient judicial system that did not always provide speedy justice, violence, and harassment against women, sexual exploitation of children, and anti-Semitic vandalism. Trafficking for sexual and labor exploitation occurred. Observers also reported cases of violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons and labor discrimination based on sexual orientation. Child labor and labor exploitation of irregular workers were also problems, especially in the service sector and the southern agricultural region.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dialog Foundation Within the Framework of Consultations of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
    www.odfoundation.eu How to create and maintain space for the free and independent activities of civil society (taking Kazakhstan as an example) Recommendations of the Open Dialog Foundation within the framework of consultations of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Report published: 26 June, 2015 www.odfoundation.eu The Open Dialog Foundation was established in Poland, in 2009, on the initiative of Lyudmyla Kozlovska (who is currently the President of the Foundation). The statutory objectives of the Foundation include the protection of human rights, democracy and rule of law in the post-Soviet area. Particular attention of the Foundation is focused on the region’s largest countries: Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. The Foundation pursues its goals through the organisation of observation missions, including election observation and monitoring of the human rights situation in the post-Soviet area. Based on these activities, the Foundation creates its reports and distributes them among the institutions of the EU, the OSCE and other international organisations, foreign ministries and parliaments of EU countries, analytical centres and media. In addition to observational and analytical activities, the Foundation is actively engaged in cooperation with members of parliaments involved in foreign affairs, human rights and relationships with the post-Soviet countries, in order to support the process of democratisation and liberalisation of their internal policies. Significant areas of the Foundation's activities also include support programmes for political prisoners and refugees. The Foundation has its permanent representative offices in Warsaw, Kiev and Brussels. Copyright: The Open Dialog Foundation, June 2015. 00-580 Warsaw Aleja Jana Chrystiana Szucha 11а, lok.
    [Show full text]
  • France Recognised the Political Nature of the Prosecution of Mukhtar Ablyazov, a Longtime Opponent of Nursultan Nazarbayev
    www.odfoundation.eu France recognised the political nature of the prosecution of Mukhtar Ablyazov, a longtime opponent of Nursultan Nazarbayev. The need to obtain ‘additional testimonies’ against Ablyazov led to the intensification of a ‘hunt’ for former top managers of BTA Bank. In particular, the Kazakhstani authorities have kidnapped Zhaksylyk Zharimbetov from Turkey and are seeking the extradition of Anatoliy Pogorelov and Roman Solodchenko. Report was published on 10 February, 2017 www.odfoundation.eu The Open Dialog Foundation was established in Poland, in 2009, on the initiative of Lyudmyla Kozlovska (who is currently the President of the Foundation). The statutory objectives of the Foundation include the protection of human rights, democracy and rule of law in the post­Soviet area. The Foundation focuses particular attention on the region’s largest countries: Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine. The Foundation pursues its goals through the organisation of observation missions, including election observation and monitoring of the human rights situation in the post­Soviet area. Based on these activities, the Foundation produces reports and distributes them among the institutions of the EU, the OSCE and other international organisations, foreign ministries and parliaments of EU countries, analytical centres and the media. In addition to observational and analytical activities, the Foundation is actively engaged in cooperation with members of parliaments involved in foreign affairs, human rights and relationships with the post­Soviet countries in order to support the process of democratisation and liberalisation of internal policies in the post­Soviet area. Significant areas of the Foundation's activities also include support programmes for political prisoners and refugees.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Elections in Kazakhstan
    INSIGHTi Parliamentary Elections in Kazakhstan January 22, 2021 Kazakhstan, a U.S. partner in areas such as regional security, counterterrorism, and nuclear nonproliferation, held parliamentary elections on January 10, 2021. According to the official tally, the ruling Nur Otan party won 71% of the vote, followed by Ak Zhol (11%) and the People’s Party of Kazakhstan (9%), granting each party 76, 12, and 10 seats, respectively, in the lower house of parliament. Two other parties, Auyl (5%) and Adal (4%), did not meet the 7% threshold to secure parliamentary mandates. No opposition parties participated in the elections, and the results yield a seat distribution broadly similar to the previous convocation of parliament, which included the same three parties. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) concluded that the elections “lacked genuine competition,” noting that the electoral contest highlighted the necessity of the government’s promised reform program. Kazakhstan’s authoritarian government has touted recent legislative changes as furthering the democratization and modernization of the country’s political system. Critics argue, however, that these initiatives remain largely superficial. Kazakhstan is a presidential republic with power heavily concentrated in the executive. Although constitutional amendments passed in 2017 devolved some powers to the legislature, the dominant Nur Otan party is closely aligned with the executive branch. The bicameral parliament comprises a 49- member Senate, designed to be nonpartisan, in which 34 senators are indirectly elected and 15 are appointed by the president, and a 107-member lower chamber, the Majilis. Nine Majilis deputies are selected by the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan (APK), a constitutional body representing the interests of Kazakhstan’s various ethnic groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan Implications for Policy and Stability in Central Asia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2007-09 Leadership transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan implications for policy and stability in Central Asia Smith, Shane A. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/3204 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS LEADERSHIP TRANSITION IN KAZAKHSTAN AND UZBEKISTAN: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND STABILITY IN CENTRAL ASIA by Shane A. Smith September 2007 Thesis Advisor: Thomas H. Johnson Second Reader: James A. Russell Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2007 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Leadership Transition in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan: 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Implications for Policy and Stability in Central Asia 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Misuse of Interpol's Red Notices and Impact on Human Rights
    STUDY Requested by the DROI committee Misuse of Interpol’s Red Notices and impact on human rights – recent developments Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union PE 603.472 - January 2019 EN DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY Misuse of Interpol’s Red Notices and impact on human rights – recent developments ABSTRACT International organisations continue to report the abuse by some states of Interpol’s Notice System to persecute national human rights defenders, civil society activists and critical journalists in violation of international standards of human rights. Available case studies, written reports and interviews with organisations working in the field confirm the reported abuses. Recent Interpol reforms have made significant impact on safeguarding individuals both substantially and procedurally. Nevertheless, and especially considering the significant increase in the number of Notices and Diffusions in the Interpol system, reforms remain to be fully implemented and transparency and enforcement mechanisms continue to leave room for improvement. Taking as a point of departure the responses from the EU institutions and bodies, and EU Member States, the study recommends taking further steps for Interpol to ensure full implementation of recent reforms, a fully transparent system and consistent legal and procedural safeguards for individuals in the Interpol Notice System. EP/EXPO/B/COMMITTEE/FWC/2013-08/Lot8/22 EN January2019 - PE 603.472 © European Union, 2019 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This paper was requested by the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Human Rights (DROI) English-language manuscript was completed on 17 January 2019. Printed in Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Mukhtar Ablyazov the Case of Tatiana Paraskevich The
    www.odfoundation.eu The case of Mukhtar Ablyazov The case of Tatiana Paraskevich The case of Alma Shalabayeva The case of Muratbek Ketebayev The case of Alexandr Pavlov www.odfoundation.eu Contents 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… (page 3) 2. The case of Mukhtar Ablyazov……………………………………………………………………………….. (page 7) 3. The case of Tatiana Paraskevich……………………………………………………………………………… (page 14) 4. The case of Alma Shalabayeva……………………………………………………………………………….. (page 17) 5. The case of Muratbek Ketebayev…………………………………………………………………………… (page 21) 6. The case of Alexandr Pavlov…………………………………………………………………………………… (page 23) 7. The cooperation of the intelligence services of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Ukraine and the Russian Federation and the prevalence of torture in these (page 28) countries……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8. Examples of misuse of the Interpol system by the countries in which human rights are violated………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… (page 32) 9. Conclusions and recommendations……………………………………………………………………….. (page 35) Appendix 1. Documents relating to the cooperation between Kazakh and Italian security agencies through Interpol channels on the case of Alma Shalabayeva………….. (page 39) Appendix 2. The inquiry of the members of the Polish Sejm, Marcin Święcicki and Ligia Krajewska to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland, Radosław (page 43) Sikorski, regarding the deportation of activists of political opposition to Kazakhstan… Appendix 3. The response of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland to the inquiry of the members of the Polish Sejm, Marcin Święcicki and Ligia (page 45) Krajewska…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 www.odfoundation.eu 1. INTRODUCTION During its 22nd annual meeting, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly expressed its regret that some OSCE participating states, seeking the arrest of opponents on politically motivated charges, continue to misuse the Interpol system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan
    Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Bremen Arbeitspapiere und Materialien No. 107 – March 2010 The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study By Andreas Heinrich Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen Klagenfurter Straße 3, 28359 Bremen, Germany phone +49 421 218-69601, fax +49 421 218-69607 http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Arbeitspapiere und Materialien – Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen No. 107: Andreas Heinrich The Formal Political System in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. A Background Study March 2010 ISSN: 1616-7384 About the author: Andreas Heinrich is a researcher at the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen. This working paper has been produced within the research project ‘The Energy Sector and the Political Stability of Regimes in the Caspian Area: A Comparison of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan’, which is being conducted by the Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen from April 2009 until April 2011 with financial support from the Volkswagen Foundation. Language editing: Hilary Abuhove Style editing: Judith Janiszewski Layout: Matthias Neumann Cover based on a work of art by Nicholas Bodde Opinions expressed in publications of the Research Centre for East European Studies are solely those of the authors. This publication may not be reprinted or otherwise reproduced—entirely or in part—without prior consent of the Research Centre for East European Studies or without giving credit to author and source. © 2010 by Forschungsstelle Osteuropa, Bremen Forschungsstelle Osteuropa Publikationsreferat Klagenfurter Str. 3 28359 Bremen – Germany phone: +49 421 218-69601 fax: +49 421 218-69607 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.forschungsstelle.uni-bremen.de Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2014 | Kazakhstan Country Report
    BTI 2014 | Kazakhstan Country Report Status Index 1-10 5.05 # 81 of 129 Political Transformation 1-10 3.85 # 102 of 129 Economic Transformation 1-10 6.25 # 47 of 129 Management Index 1-10 4.67 # 74 of 129 scale score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2014. It covers the period from 31 January 2011 to 31 January 2013. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2014 — Kazakhstan Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2014. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. BTI 2014 | Kazakhstan 2 Key Indicators Population M 16.8 HDI 0.754 GDP p.c. $ 13916.6 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.4 HDI rank of 187 69 Gini Index 29.0 Life expectancy years 68.9 UN Education Index 0.839 Poverty3 % 1.1 Urban population % 53.5 Gender inequality2 0.312 Aid per capita $ 3.1 Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2013 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2013. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary At the close of Kazakhstan’s chairmanship of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), 2011 began on a note of optimism. However, by the end of the year, 2011 would be called “one of the hardest and most tragic” in the 20 years of Kazakhstani independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Kazakhstan: a Case of Good Economics, Bad Politics?
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 14554 The Political Economy of Kazakhstan: A Case of Good Economics, Bad Politics? Simon Commander Ruta Prieskienyte JULY 2021 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 14554 The Political Economy of Kazakhstan: A Case of Good Economics, Bad Politics? Simon Commander Altura Partners, IE Business School and IZA Ruta Prieskienyte University of Bath JULY 2021 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 14554 JULY 2021 ABSTRACT The Political Economy of Kazakhstan: A Case of Good Economics, Bad Politics?* Can autocracies and their associated institutions successfully implement economic policies that promote growth and investment? Can ‘good economics’ somehow offset the effects of ‘bad’ politics? Kazakhstan is a case where an autocratic regime has actively projected market-friendly policies and attracted significant amounts of incoming investment.
    [Show full text]