Spartan Wives: Liberation or Licence? Author(s): Paul Cartledge Source: The Classical Quarterly, New Series, Vol. 31, No. 1 (1981), pp. 84-105 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/638462 . Accessed: 23/09/2011 09:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Cambridge University Press and The Classical Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Classical Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org ClassicalQuarterly 31 (i) 84-105 (1981) Printedin GreatBritain 84 SPARTAN WIVES: LIBERATION OR LICENCE?* I The neologism 'sexist' has gained entry to an Oxford Dictionary, The Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, third edition (1974), where it is defined as 'derisive of the female sex and expressive of masculine superiority'. Thus 'sexpot' and 'sex kitten', which are still defined in exclusively feminine terms in the fifth edition of The Concise Oxford Dictionary (1976), have finally met their lexicographical match. This point about current English usage has of course a serious, and general, application. For language reflects,when it does not direct, prevailingsocial conceptions. Thus it is not accidental that there is no masculine counterpart to the word 'feminism'.