Failing Oversight: Iraq's Unchecked Government

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Failing Oversight: Iraq's Unchecked Government FAILING OVERSIGHT: IRAQ’S UNCHECKED GOVERNMENT Middle East Report N°113 – 26 September 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION: RISING PUBLIC ANGER ............................................................. 1 A. INITIAL PROTESTS AND GOVERNMENT RESPONSE ........................................................................ 1 B. 100 DAYS WASTED ...................................................................................................................... 2 II. A SISYPHEAN BATTLE AGAINST CORRUPTION ................................................. 3 A. THE OVERSIGHT FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................... 4 B. AN UNCHECKED GOVERNMENT ................................................................................................... 4 1. The lawlessness of 2003-2008 ..................................................................................................... 4 2. Government manipulation ........................................................................................................... 5 3. Failure to enact reform ................................................................................................................. 8 C. AN EXPLOSIVE RISE IN CORRUPTION ........................................................................................... 9 D. SECURITY SINCE 2008: SPACE FOR REFORM ............................................................................... 10 III. IMPAIRED OVERSIGHT AGENCIES ....................................................................... 11 A. THE BOARD OF SUPREME AUDIT: EMASCULATED AT THE WRONG TIME .................................... 12 B. THE INTEGRITY COMMISSION: THE CPA’S PAPER TIGER ........................................................... 13 C. THE INSPECTORS GENERAL: OVERSIGHT’S ACHILLES’ HEEL ..................................................... 14 D. THE URGENT NEED FOR REFORM ............................................................................................... 16 1. Bureaucratic inefficiencies ......................................................................................................... 16 2. A deficient legal framework ...................................................................................................... 16 IV. PARLIAMENTARY PARALYSIS ............................................................................... 18 A. POWERFUL ON PAPER ................................................................................................................ 18 B. AN IMPAIRED LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION ...................................................................................... 19 1. Inexperience, nepotism and sectarianism ................................................................................... 19 2. Parliament or conference centre? ............................................................................................... 20 C. OVERSIGHT: FEAR NOT PARLIAMENT’S WRATH ......................................................................... 22 V. THE JUDICIARY: WEAK AND VULNERABLE TO POLITICAL INTERFERENCE .......................................................................................................... 23 A. CENTRALISATION OF CONTROL .................................................................................................. 23 B. POLITICAL INTERFERENCE ......................................................................................................... 24 VI. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 26 APPENDICES A. MAP OF IRAQ ................................................................................................................................... 28 B. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP .................................................................................... 29 C. CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS ON THE MIDDLE EAST SINCE 2008 .................................... 30 D. CRISIS GROUP BOARD OF TRUSTEES ................................................................................................ 32 Middle East Report N°113 26 September 2011 FAILING OVERSIGHT: IRAQ’S UNCHECKED GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS After years of uncertainty, conflict and instability, the Today judges are protected by interior ministry forces. Iraqi state appears to be consolidating by reducing violence The Council of Representatives (parliament) is reliant solely sufficiently to allow for a semblance of normalcy. Yet in on local police and private contractors for its security. the meantime, it has allowed corruption to become en- The state has resumed most of its functions. trenched and spread throughout its institutions. This, in turn, has contributed to a severe decay in public services. Prime Despite this improved environment, public services continue Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s government has exacerbated to be plagued by severe deficiencies, notably widespread the problem by interfering in anti-corruption cases, ma- corruption, which spread like a virus throughout state in- nipulating investigations for political advantage and in- stitutions during the years of lawlessness that prevailed timidating critics to prevent a replication of the type of until 2008. One of the major causes of this depressing popular movements that already have brought down three state of affairs is the state’s failing oversight framework, regimes in the region. The government’s credibility in the which has allowed successive governments to operate un- fight against corruption has eroded as a result, and this, checked. The 2005 constitution and the existing legal together with troubling authoritarian tendencies, is giving framework require a number of institutions – the Board of ammunition to the prime minister’s critics. To bolster its Supreme Audit, the Integrity Commission, the Inspectors faltering legitimacy, Maliki’s government will have to General, parliament and the courts – to monitor government launch a vigorous anti-corruption campaign, improve service operations. Yet, none of these institutions has been able delivery and create checks and balances in the state system. to assert itself in the face of government interference, in- transigence and manipulation, a deficient legal framework As violence spread following the 2003 U.S. invasion, the and ongoing threats of violence. state suffered in equal measure to the general population. In an environment of escalating kidnappings, explosions and These factors have caused senior officials to resign, in- assassinations, public services were thoroughly devastated. cluding most notably the head of the Integrity Commission In the wake of the dramatic February 2006 Samarra on 9 September 2011. Even civil society organisations – bombing, entire ministries were empty, as officials dared confronted by government intimidation in the form of not travel to work. Longstanding projects were abandoned anonymous threats, arrests of political activists and vio- overnight. Judges and parliamentarians found they had lence, including police brutality – have proved incapable of become targets. Oversight agencies, which should have placing a check on government. Although the perpetrators been less exposed to risk because of their lack of direct have yet to be found, the killing on 9 September 2011 of a contact with the general population, were forced to roll prominent journalist and leading organiser of weekly pro- back their operations, leaving state institutions without ef- tests against government corruption has contributed to ris- fective safeguards against corruption or abuse. As a result, ing fears of the Maliki government’s authoritarian streak. state output declined dramatically for a number of years, even as the annual budget steadily increased due to elevated The current oversight framework was established by the oil prices. The state’s paralysis contributed to the prolifera- U.S. Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) in 2004. The tion of criminal elements and vested interests throughout CPA enacted a number of ill-considered reforms from the the bureaucracy. start. It stripped the Board of Supreme Audit, previously Iraq’s only such institution, of significant powers, including By 2009, a combination of factors allowed the state to re- the exclusive authority to oversee public procurement and assert itself. The U.S. surge (2007-2009) was an important refer suspected corruption cases to the courts. The CPA initial factor in improving security, but insofar as institu- transferred that authority to the Integrity Commission, tions were concerned, the rebuilt security forces sufficiently an institution established in 2004 to act as the focal point enhanced safety to enable officials to go back to work for all anti-corruption activities. Despite having overcome without protection or assistance from the U.S. military. serious threats to its existence in its early years, the Com- mission to this day cannot carry out its investigations in- Failing Oversight: Iraq’s Unchecked Government Crisis Group Middle East Report N°113, 26 September 2011 Page ii dependently, as a result of staffing problems and restricted work’s deficiencies and will not significantly improve the access to certain government departments. It has, therefore, state’s performance. Until these, as well as other, actions been dependent on the Inspectors
Recommended publications
  • Exploring Corruption in Public Financial Management 267 William Dorotinsky and Shilpa Pradhan
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 39985 The Many Faces of Corruption The Many Faces of Corruption Tracking Vulnerabilities at the Sector Level EDITED BY J. Edgardo Campos Sanjay Pradhan Washington, D.C. © 2007 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved 2 3 4 5 10 09 08 07 This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crime of Genocide and International Law: a Perspective on the 1915 Events Erdoğan İşcan *
    GİFGRF 23 April 2021 The Crime of Genocide and International Law: A Perspective on the 1915 Events Erdoğan İşcan * * Ambassador (R) Erdoğan İşcan is Member of the United Nations Committee Against Torture. He also teaches international human rights law at Istanbul Kültür University. He served as Ambassador to Ukraine, South Korea (also accredited to North Korea) and the Council of Europe in Strasbourg. He is currently a member of the Global Relations Forum. The Genocide Convention There is unquestionable consensus on the fact that genocide is the gravest crime against humanity. The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (hereinafter the Genocide Convention or the Convention), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948 and entered into force on12 January 1951, sets specific legal standards with a view to defining and identifying the acts which may amount to the crime of genocide. Currently, 152 Member States of the United Nations are parties to the Convention. There are also 41 signatures not followed by ratifications. It would thus be safe to assert that the Convention enjoys universal recognition and it is a legally binding component of international law. Turkey acceded to the Convention on 31 July 1950 without any reservation. Many States have ratified the Convention with a number of reservations. One example is the United States that ratified the Convention on 25 November 1988 with two “reservations”, five “understandings”, and one “declaration”. Article I of the Convention establishes genocide as an international crime “whether committed in time of peace or in time of war”, inviting the States to prevent and punish this crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Informing the Blue Helmets: the United States, Un Peacekeeping Operations, and the Role of Intelligence
    INFORMING THE BLUE HELMETS INFORMING THE BLUE HELMETS: THE UNITED STATES, UN PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS, AND THE ROLE OF INTELLIGENCE Robert E. Rehbein Centre for International Relations, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada 1996 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Rehbein, Robert E., 1959– Informing the blue helmets : the United States, UN peace operations, and the role of intelligence (Martello papers, ISSN 1183-3661 ; 16) ISBN 0-88911-705-5 1. United Nations – United States. 2. Intelligence service – United States. 3. United Nations – Armed Forces. I. Queen’s University (Kingston, Ont.). Centre for International Relations. II. Title. III. Series. JX1977.2.U5RA 1996 341.2’373 C96-930235-5 © Copyright 1996 The Martello Papers The Queen’s University Centre for International Relations (QCIR) is pleased to present the sixteenth in its series of security studies, the Martello Papers. Taking their name from the distinctive towers built during the nineteenth century to defend Kingston, Ontario, these papers cover a wide range of topics and issues relevant to international strategic relations of today. Over the past several years, as peacekeeping activity has become more substan- tial in Europe and the Americas, the Centre has devoted increasing attention to it. The experience of peacekeepers in complex post-Cold War conflicts has under- lined the importance of intelligence capabilities in peacekeeping. Given the dearth of in-house intelligence resources in the United Nations system, it is frequently assumed that peacekeepers must rely to a considerable extent on national intelli- gence gathering capabilities, and notably those of the United States. This Martello Paper, by Robert Rehbein of the United States Air Force, addresses the question of US intelligence support for UN peace operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2020
    CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. #cpi2020 www.transparency.org/cpi Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of January 2021. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN: 978-3-96076-157-0 2021 Transparency International. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 DE. Quotation permitted. Please contact Transparency International – [email protected] – regarding derivatives requests. CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2020 2-3 12-13 20-21 Map and results Americas Sub-Saharan Africa Peru Malawi 4-5 Honduras Zambia Executive summary Recommendations 14-15 22-23 Asia Pacific Western Europe and TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE European Union 6-7 Vanuatu Myanmar Malta Global highlights Poland 8-10 16-17 Eastern Europe & 24 COVID-19 and Central Asia Methodology corruption Serbia Health expenditure Belarus Democratic backsliding 25 Endnotes 11 18-19 Middle East & North Regional highlights Africa Lebanon Morocco TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL 180 COUNTRIES. 180 SCORES. HOW DOES YOUR COUNTRY MEASURE UP?
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Overview of Corruption and Anti-Corruption
    www.transparency.org www.cmi.no Iraq: overview of corruption and anti-corruption Query Please provide an overview of corruption and anti-corruption efforts in Iraq. Purpose become increasingly aware of the enormous corruption challenges it faces. Massive embezzlement, We would like to provide all country offices with an anti- procurement scams, money laundering, oil smuggling corruption country profile to inform their contribution and widespread bureaucratic bribery have led the portfolio analysis country to the bottom of international corruption rankings, fuelled political violence and hampered Content effective state building and service delivery. 1. Overview of corruption in Iraq Although the country’s anti-corruption initiatives and framework have expanded since 2005, they still fail to 2. Anti-corruption efforts in Iraq provide a strong and comprehensive integrity system. 3. References Political interference in anti-corruption bodies and politicisation of corruption issues, weak civil society, insecurity, lack of resources and incomplete legal Caveat provisions severely limit the government’s capacity to This answer does not extensively deal with the efficiently curb soaring corruption. Ensuring the integrity specificities of the Kurdistan Regional Government of the management of Iraq’s massive and growing oil (KRG) and primarily focuses on corruption and anti- revenue will therefore be one of the country’s greatest corruption in the rest of Iraq. challenges in the coming years. Summary After a difficult beginning marked by institutional instability, Iraq’s new regime has in recent years Author(s): Maxime Agator, Transparency International, [email protected] Reviewed by: Marie Chêne, Transparency International, [email protected]; Finn Heinrich, Ph.D, [email protected] Date: April 2013 Number: 374 U4 is a web-based resource centre for development practitioners who wish to effectively address corruption challenges in their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Worse Than ISIS: Causes and Cures Cures for Iraqi Corruption
    Corruption Worse Than ISIS: Causes and Cures Cures for Iraqi Corruption Frank R. Gunter Professor of Economics, Lehigh University Advisory Council Member, Iraq Britain Business Council “Corruption benefits the few at the expense of the many; it delays and distorts economic development, pre-empts basic rights and due process, and diverts resources from basic services, international aid, and whole economies. Particularly where state institutions are weak, it is often linked to violence.” (Johnston 2006 as quoted by Allawi 2020) Like sand after a desert storm, corruption permeates every corner of Iraqi society. According to Transparency International (2021), Iraq is not the most corrupt country on earth – that dubious honor is a tie between Somalia and South Sudan – but Iraq is in the bottom 12% ranking 160th out of the 180 countries evaluated. With respect to corruption, Iraq is tied with Cambodia, Chad, Comoros, and Eritrea. Corruption in Iraq extends from the ministries in Baghdad to police stations and food distribution centers in every small town. (For excellent overviews of the range and challenges of corruption in Iraq, see Allawi 2020 and Looney 2008.) While academics may argue that small amounts of corruption act as a “lubricant” for government activities, the large scale of corruption in Iraq undermines private and public attempts to achieve a better life for the average Iraqi. A former Iraqi Minister of Finance and a Governor of the Central Bank both stated that the deleterious impact of corruption was worse than that of the insurgency (Minister of Finance 2005). This is consistent with the Knack and Keefer study (1995, Table 3) that showed that corruption has a greater adverse impact on economic growth than political violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary World Bank & International Monetary Fund Networkon
    PARLIAMENTARY NETWORK ON THE WORLD BANK & INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND Annual Conference2013 BAKU AZERBAIJAN 23-24 MAY Baku, Azerbaijan ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2013 DESCRIPTION The Annual Conference is the Parliamentary Network’s flagship event, bringing together over 200 network members, leaders from civil society and partner organizations, and top officials from International Financial Institutions including the World Bank and the IMF. The Annual Conference is both an annual general meeting for members to identify the Network’s policy foci for the upcoming year, as well as a conference on development and macroeconomic priorities. The agenda - which runs over two to three days - is packed with stimulating and informative sessions as well as many opportunities for discussion. Past attendees include the presidents of Brazil, Indonesia and Senegal. Previous participants attending the Annual Conference engaged with the President of the World Bank, the Managing Director of the IMF, Nobel Economics Laureates, high-level national officials, CSOs, academia, and private sector representatives. The Par- liamentary Network annual conferences are hosted by the Parliament and Government of countries where the event takes place. CONFERENCE OBJECTIVES The global financial crisis and subsequent Great Recession have had a significant impact on the world economy and on people’s lives. The global economy is now moving at different speeds. Some countries, particularly emerging market and developing economies, are doing well. Others are on the mend, for example the U.S. But other economies including the euro area and Japan - still have some distance to travel. The challenge for today’s policy makers - including parliamentarians - is to help turn this three-speed global economy into a full speed economy which delivers equitable growth and much needed employment, in particular for the world’s youth.
    [Show full text]
  • The MIT Press Journals
    The MIT Press Journals http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals This article is provided courtesy of The MIT Press. To join an e-mail alert list and receive the latest news on our publications, please visit: http://mitpress.mit.edu/e-mail The NGO Scramble Alexander Cooley and James Ron Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action Scholarly assessments of transnational actors are largely optimistic, suggesting they herald an emerg- ing global civil society comprising local civic groups, international organiza- tions (IOs), and international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs). This newcivil society, moreover, is widelyassumed to rest upon shared liberal norms and values that motivate INGO action and explain their supposedly be- 1 nignThe NGO Scramble inºuence on international relations. Alexander Cooley is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia University.James Ron is Canada Research Chair in Conºict and Human Rights, Department of Sociology, McGill University. A version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Associa- tion, NewOrleans, Louisiana, March 24–27, 2002. The authors are grateful for comments by Peter Andreas, Mark Blyth, Mlada Bukovansky, Elisabeth Jay Friedman, Kevin Hartigan, Patrick Jack- son, Paula Duarte Lopes, Larry Minear, Dominique Morel, Emma Naughton, Hendrik Spruyt, Jacques Stroun, Kellee Tsai, Peter Uvin, members of the nongovernmental organization commu- nity who have chosen to remain anonymous, and three anonymous reviewers for International Security. 1. For recent works, see John Boli and George M. Thomas, eds., Constructing World Culture: Interna- tional Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999); Ann Marie Clark, Diplomacy of Conscience: Amnesty International and Changing Human Rights Norms (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001); Martha Finnemore, National Interests in Interna- tional Society (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996); Margaret E.
    [Show full text]
  • U4 Helpdesk Answer
    U4 Helpdesk Answer U4 Helpdesk Answer 2020 11 December 2020 AUTHOR Corruption and anti- Jennifer Schoeberlein corruption in Iraq [email protected] Since the fall of Saddam Hussein in a US-led military operation in REVIEWED BY 2003, Iraq has struggled to build and maintain political stability, Saul Mullard (U4) safety and the rule of law. Deeply entrenched corruption [email protected] continues to be a significant problem in the country and a core grievance among citizens. Among the country’s key challenges, Matthew Jenkins (TI) and at the root of its struggle with corruption is its [email protected] consociationalist governance system, known as muhasasa, which many observers contend has cemented sectarianism, nepotism and state capture. Consecutive governments since 2003 have promised to tackle RELATED U4 MATERIAL corruption through economic and political reform. But, as yet, these promises have not been followed by sufficient action. This is Influencing governments on anti- partly due to an unwillingness to tackle the systemic nature of corruption using non-aid means corruption, weak institutions ill-equipped to implement reform Iraq: 2015 Overview of corruption efforts and strong opposition from vested interests looking to and anti-corruption maintain the status quo. As a result, Iraq is left with an inadequate legal framework to fight corruption and with insufficiently equipped and independent anti-corruption institutions. Trust in government and the political process has been eroded, erupting in ongoing country-wide protests against corruption, inadequate service delivery and high unemployment. This leaves the new government of Prime Minister Kadhimi, who has once more promised to tackle the country’s massive corruption challenges, with a formidable task at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq's Public Administrative Issues: Corruption
    inistrat dm ion A a c n li d b M u a P n Craciunescu, Review Pub Administration Manag 2017, 5:2 f a o Review of Public Administration g e w m DOI: 10.4172/2315-7844.1000207 e i e v n e t R ISSN: 2315-7844 and Management Research Article Open Access Iraq's Public Administrative Issues: Corruption Cosmina Ioana Craciunescu* Department of Public Policy Analysis, University of Babes-Bolyai, Romania *Corresponding author: Cosmina Ioana Craciunescu, Department of Public Policy Analysis, Romania, Tel: +40-741091904; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: March 20, 2017, Acc date: May 02, 2017, Pub date: May 04, 2017 Copyright: © 2016 Craciunescu CI. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Iraq has been deeply affected by corruption, particularly during the years of wars that left a heavy imprint on the country, at all levels of social functionality, including the public administrative system. Corruption is deeply rooted in Iraq, as it seemed to gain proportions with the coming of the Islamic State to power. The topic was chosen particularly because the issue of corruption represents a very important subject, also being a social phenomenon that affects the administration along with the society of Iraq. Moreover, with the coming of the Islamic State to power, corruption reached its peaks, as the organization gradually destroyed the administrative system. Along with the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Iraq suffered from the outcomes of the disastruous management at the level of government.
    [Show full text]
  • MSF and the War in the Former Yugoslavia 1991-2003 in the Former MSF and the War Personalities in Political and Military Positions at the Time of the Events
    MSF AND THE WAR IN THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA 1991 - 2003 This case study is also available on speakingout.msf.org/en/msf-and-the-war-in-the-former-yugoslavia P MSF SPEAKS OUT MSF Speaking Out Case Studies In the same collection, “MSF Speaking Out”: - “Salvadoran refugee camps in Honduras 1988” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - December 2013] - “Genocide of Rwandan Tutsis 1994” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “Rwandan refugee camps Zaire and Tanzania 1994-1995” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “The violence of the new Rwandan regime 1994-1995” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2003 - April 2004 - April 2014] - “Hunting and killings of Rwandan Refugee in Zaire-Congo 1996-1997” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [August 2004 - April 2014] - ‘’Famine and forced relocations in Ethiopia 1984-1986” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [January 2005 - November 2013] - “Violence against Kosovar Albanians, NATO’s Intervention 1998-1999” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [September 2006] - “War crimes and politics of terror in Chechnya 1994-2004’” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [June 2010-September 2014] - “Somalia 1991-1993: Civil war, famine alert and UN ‘military-humanitarian’ intervention” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [October 2013] - “MSF and North Korea 1995-1998” Laurence Binet - Médecins Sans Frontières [November 2014] - “MSF and Srebrenica 1993-2003”
    [Show full text]
  • Frank R. Gunter
    Frank R. Gunter M E P Produced by the Foreign Policy Research Institute. Author: Frank R. Gunter Edited by: Thomas J. Shattuck Designed by: Natalia Kopytnik © 2020 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute Our mission The Foreign Policy Research Institute is an independent nonpartisan 501(c)(3) non profit think tank based in Philadelphia, PA. FPRI was founded in 1955 by Robert Strausz-Hupe, a former U.S. ambassador. Today, FPRI’s work continues to support Strausz-Hupe’s belief that “a nation must think before it acts” through our five regional and topical research programs, education initiatives, and public engagement both locally and nationally. FPRI is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. About the Author Frank R. Gunter PhD is a Senior Fellow in the Foreign Policy Research Institute’s Middle East Program, a Professor of Economics at Lehigh University, and a retired U.S. Marine Colonel. After receiving his Doctorate in Political Economy from Johns Hopkins University in 1985, Dr. Gunter joined the faculty of Lehigh University where he teaches Principles of Economics, Economic Development, and the Political Economy of Iraq. He has won four major and multiple minor awards for excellence in undergraduate teaching. In 2005-2006 and 2008-2009, he served as an economic advisor to the U.S. Government in Baghdad for which he received the Bronze Star Medal and the Senior Civilian Service Award. Based on his experiences, he wrote, The Political Economy of Iraq: Restoring Balance in a Post-Conflict Society.
    [Show full text]