DOCSLIB.ORG

Where Does Jewish Teaching Come From? the 3 Parts of Our Bible

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Where Does Jewish Teaching Come From? the 3 Parts of Our Bible 12/11/2018 Understanding Jewish Religious Values & Their Role In Health Care A View From Jewish Tradition Rabbi James A. Gibson, Temple Sinai, Pittsburgh, PA Where Does Jewish Teaching Come From? Torah (5 Books of Moses) Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy (compiled from 1850-650 BCE) Seen as source of God’s authority in the world Understood by Jews as God’s will for the Jewish people Contains 613 Commandments knows as mitzvot Judaism, despite its many streams, sees its mission and integrity in interpreting and applying these laws to our lives These laws cover our relationship to God through ritual and every conceivable human interchange, from criminal jurisprudence to labor law, from marriage & divorce to how we treat animals The 3 Parts of our Bible: Torah, Prophets, Writings Total of 39 books: Torah – Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy Prophets - Joshua, Judges, I/II Samuel, I/II Kings, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi Writings - Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, I/II Chronicles 1 12/11/2018 The Five Books of the Torah Are More Authoritative than All Other Bible Books Example of Abortion – The Book of Jeremiah Jeremiah 1.5 The word of God came to me: Before I created you in the womb I selected you; Before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet concerning the nations. This verse is regularly used to infer that the Bible recognizes personhood of a fetus before birth Because the statement is from the Bible it is presumed to have the highest spiritual authority BUT… Torah’s View Trumps Jeremiah Example of Abortion - From the Torah Exodus 21.22: When men fight, and one of them pushes a pregnant woman and a miscarriage results, but no other damage ensues, the one responsible shall be fined according as the woman’s husband may exact from him…but if other damage ensues, the penalty shall be life for life… Torah law says that a fetus is protected with the threat of a monetary fine. A born person is protected with the threat of capital punishment. Therefore, fetal life is not equivalent to born life outside the womb How Can The Rest of the Bible Carry Less Weight? Only Torah is given in its entirety by God to the Jewish people in a mass revelation described in Exodus 19 More than 600,000 individuals at Mt. Sinai were there God wrote the Mitzvot (Commandments) endowing them with ultimate authority and perfection All other revelations of God’s will are to individuals or small groups. Miracles are not revelations 2 12/11/2018 613 Laws of The Torah Fulfilling the Mitzvot correctly is the goal of observant Jews – by doing so they fulfill the will of the Creator of the Universe who gave us Torah as a gift and an obligation There are (acc. to Rabbinic tradition) 613 commandments/mitzvot in the Torah 248 + commandments (bones in body) 365 – commandments (days of year) >300 have been null and void since the destruction of the 2nd Temple by the Romans in 70 CE Study of Torah and Talmud for their own sake is a primary religious act in Judaism Scholars take up the challenge of applying the laws to everyday modern life Torah’s laws are considered more authoritative for Jews than any other book or section of the Hebrew Bible – nothing trumps Torah! Later Rabbis Interpret & Apply the Commandments Core Rabbinic literature was composed between 200 BCE-550 CE It is composed of two main works/disciplines: Midrash – Interpretation of all Torah verses and the laws contained within Mishnah – Application of Torah laws through reasoning and experience Talmud – Composed of of Mishnah (200 BCE-200 CE) and the Gemara (200-550CE) There are two Talmuds, one composed in Babylon (Iraq) the other in the land of Israel (known as the Jerusalem Talmud) The Babylonian Talmud is considered the more authoritative of the two Talmud Discussions Redacted Into Codes Core Legal Codes in Judaism Mishneh Torah by Moses Maimonides (1135-1204) Shulchan Aruch by Yosef Karo (1488-1575) Karo’s code refined because of differences between Jewish practice in Mediterranean countries (Sephardic) and German/Eastern European countries (Ashkenazic) Moses Isserles (1522-1572) wrote interlinear notes to show how Ashkenazi Jews were to follow the laws set out in the Shulchan Aruch 3 12/11/2018 When The Law Isn’t Clear, Ask! Rabbis have served as judges on Jewish legal matters for more than 2,000 years Individual rabbinic decisions are known as responsa (sing. responsum) If a traditional Jew is not certain whether an act is permitted or prohibited or is not sure what course of action accords with the Torah, s/he asks a rabbi who either consults other rabbis or issues his own legal ruling Who Owns You? Clear in Jewish sources from the Torah through the Talmud that God owns us Only God has the authority to gives & take life Human decisions to end life are illegitimate: Murder Suicide (exceptions?) Abortion – a very complicated matter! (not for today) God Creates Humanity By Infusing Breath Then the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul (Genesis 2.6) Breathing is a condition of life The very word for soul in Hebrew is based on the verb “to breathe” Question: Does breath have to be initiated by the individual or can it be prompted by machine and still be called human life? 4 12/11/2018 God Ends Moses’ Life By Drawing Out His Breath So Moses the servant of the God died there in the land of Moab, by God’s word (literally: mouth). And he was buried in the valley in the land of Moab over against Beth- Peor; and no man knows of his burial place unto this day. And Moses was a hundred and twenty years old when he died: his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated. (Deuteronomy 34.1-7) V’chai Bahem – You Shall LIVE by Them (mitzvot) Leviticus 18.5 implies that we should follow the commandments in order to “live by them” This is taken to mean that living is itself a commandment and we are to use the means of science, medicine and faith to heal and further life For example – Normative Orthodox law now prohibits smoking as it causes premature death. Similarly it would ban illegal drug use or other human habits that might shorten life Why? Again, life is from God! End Of Life T’reifa – A person “…known for certain that he had a fatal organic disease and physicians say that his disease is incurable by human agency and that he would have died of it even if he had not been killed in another way.” Goses/Goseset – One who is dying, usually within 3 days of death Physician determines status of patient Rabbi yields to physician on the physical condition of the patient Niftar/Nif-t’ra – One who has died (literally, departed) 5 12/11/2018 Are We Allowed To Hasten Death? And so it is forbidden to cause the dead person to die quickly. Such as one who was dying for a long time and he could not separate, it is forbidden to remove the pillow or the mattress from underneath hum, because they say that there are feathers of some birds that cause this, and similarly they should not move him from his place. And similarly it is forbidden to place the keys of the synagogue under his head, in order that he take leave. But if there is something there that is causing delay in the departure of the soul, such as if there is a banging noise next to that house, such as a wood chopper, or there is salt on his tongue, and these are preventing the departure of the soul, it is permitted to remove it from there, that in this there is no activity at all, rather he removes the barrier. (Shulchan Aruch/Yoreh Deah 339.1) Responses Of Different Streams: Orthodox Orthodox Judaism teaches: “Any positive act designed to hasten the death of the patient is equated with murder in Jewish law, even if death is hastened by only a matter of minutes.” Rabbi J. David Bleich, quoted by Fred Rosner in Modern Medicine and Jewish Ethics, Ktav Publishing, NYC, 1991 YET… “However, he is not obligated to employ procedures which are themselves hazardous in nature and may potentially foreshorten the life of the patient. Nor is either the physician obligated to employ a therapy which is experimental in nature.” (ibid.) Reponses Of Different Streams: Conservative “[An act taken] with proper precautions to insure that such decisions are taken seriously...a decision to remove modes of medical intervention from such people in given cases may be taken in good conscience and in consonance with Jewish law, even though such action will lead to their deaths.” (from “A Jewish Approach to End- Stage Medical Care,” Rabbinical Assembly (Conservative Rabbis’ Association, 1991) “If the goses category is to be used to regulate care of the terminally ill, this policy permitting the withdrawal and withholding of aggressive treatments from such patients invokes the Jewish tradition's distinction between sustaining the life and prolonging the death of the moribund. The definition of the person to whom it applies (the goses), however, is broader than most Orthodox rabbis make it- but.. more in keeping with the intent of the tradition.” (ibid.) 6 12/11/2018 Responses Of Different Streams: Reform “When, however, a patient has entered the final stages of terminal disease, medical treatments and procedures which serve only to maintain this state of existence are not required.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sermon: How As a Christian Should I Respond? (Jen Goode 03‐04‐2018)
    Page 1 – Sermon: How as a Christian should I respond? (Jen Goode 03‐04‐2018) (Exodus 20:1‐17; Psalm 19; John 2:13‐22) Let us pray: Holy One, I pray that the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart will be acceptable in your sight, my rock and my redeemer. Amen. On January 13 of this year, I posted on my Facebook page a letter I had seen to a company called Scholastic. I’m not sure if you all know this company, but Scholastic encourages school‐aged children to purchase books through monthly flyers that are sent home in backpacks. This is the letter Jaime Brusehoff wrote: “Dear Scholastic: I’ve heard you’ve been targeted … for offering and celebrating books that are LGBTQ‐inclusive. I’m sorry they’re targeting you with their ignorance and miseducation. As the mom of a transgender child, I want to say thank you. What you are doing matters. Your books make a difference. Representation matters, and when my transgender daughter reads a book that features a transgender character, she feels seen, affirmed, and valued. She thrives knowing that her peers are reading books about kids like her too. When she meets a new friend who doesn’t quite understand what it means to be transgender, do you know what she does? She hands them a book. I regularly do trainings for educators and other professionals who work with youth, and when I come with my stack of children’s books that celebrate gender creative and transgender kids, they are so happy and relieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Maimonides on the First Commandment: Belief In
    Special for Shavuoth 5768 Is Belief in God a Miztvah? Maimonides on the First Commandment Rabbi Assaf Bednarsh The first of the Ten Commandments, which we will read with much fanfare on Shavuot morning, is “Anochi Hashem Elokecha” – I am the Lord your God. Or is it? The Torah never actually refers to ten commandments, but to “Aseret HaDibrot”, ten statements, that God uttered to the Jewish people at Sinai. While the importance of these ten statements has never been questioned, the question of whether they in fact constitute commandments is quite controversial, specifically with regard to the first of these statements. Rambam, in his Sefer HaMitzvot, counts belief in God as the very first mitzvah, and cites “Anochi Hashem Elokecha” as the Biblical source for the commandment of faith. Ramban, however, in his glosses to Sefer HaMitzvot, points out that the passuk is not phrased as a commandment – “Believe in the Lord your God”, but rather as a statement of fact – “I am the Lord your God.” Therefore, the earlier mitzvah compendium Halachot Gedolot did not count the first of the ten statements as one of the 613 commandments, viewing it rather as a statement of theological fact. Of course, Halachot Gedolot does not deny that a good Jew must believe in God, but he understands that this requirement is too basic to be counted as a mitzvah. Faith is the pillar which supports all the 613 mitzvot of the Torah, and thus is not considered one of them. Rav Soloveitchik once summarized this disagreement using halachic terminology –Rambam considers faith as a mitzvah, but Halachot Gedolot considers it a “hechsher mitzvah”, a necessary precondition of the mitzvot.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos
    Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos: Some Tentative Thoughts David Berger The deep and systemic tension between contemporary egalitarianism and many authoritative Jewish texts about gentiles takes varying forms. Most Orthodox Jews remain untroubled by some aspects of this tension, understanding that Judaism’s affirmation of chosenness and hierarchy can inspire and ennoble without denigrating others. In other instances, affirmations of metaphysical differences between Jews and gentiles can take a form that makes many of us uncomfortable, but we have the legitimate option of regarding them as non-authoritative. Finally and most disturbing, there are positions affirmed by standard halakhic sources from the Talmud to the Shulhan Arukh that apparently stand in stark contrast to values taken for granted in the modern West and taught in other sections of the Torah itself. Let me begin with a few brief observations about the first two categories and proceed to somewhat more extended ruminations about the third. Critics ranging from medieval Christians to Mordecai Kaplan have directed withering fire at the doctrine of the chosenness of Israel. Nonetheless, if we examine an overarching pattern in the earliest chapters of the Torah, we discover, I believe, that this choice emerges in a universalist context. The famous statement in the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 4:5) that Adam was created singly so that no one would be able to say, “My father is greater than yours” underscores the universality of the original divine intent. While we can never know the purpose of creation, one plausible objective in light of the narrative in Genesis is the opportunity to actualize the values of justice and lovingkindness through the behavior of creatures who subordinate themselves to the will 1 of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Readings on the Encounter Between Jewish Thought and Early Modern Science
    HISTORY 449 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA W 3:30pm-6:30 pm Fall, 2016 GOD AND NATURE: READINGS ON THE ENCOUNTER BETWEEN JEWISH THOUGHT AND EARLY MODERN SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR: David B. Ruderman OFFICE HRS: M 3:30-4:30 pm;W 1:00-2:00 OFFICE: 306b College Hall Email: [email protected] SOME GENERAL WORKS ON THE SUBJECT: Y. Tzvi Langerman, "Jewish Science", Dictionary of the Middle Ages, 11:89-94 Y. Tzvi Langerman, The Jews and the Sciences in the Middle Ages, 1999 A. Neher, "Copernicus in the Hebraic Literature from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century," Journal History of Ideas 38 (1977): 211-26 A. Neher, Jewish Thought and the Scientific Revolution of the Sixteenth Century: David Gans (1541-1613) and His Times, l986 H. Levine, "Paradise not Surrendered: Jewish Reactions to Copernicus and the Growth of Modern Science" in R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, eds. Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences (Boston, l983), pp. 203-25 H. Levine, "Science," in Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought, eds. A. Cohen and P. Mendes-Flohr, l987, pp. 855-61 M. Panitz, "New Heavens and a New Earth: Seventeenth- to Nineteenth-Century Jewish Responses to the New Astronomy," Conservative Judaism, 40 (l987-88); 28-42 D. Ruderman, Kabbalah, Magic, and Science: The Cultural Universe of a Sixteenth- Century Jewish Physician, l988 D. Ruderman, Science, Medicine, and Jewish Culture in Early Modern Europe, Spiegel Lectures in European Jewish History, 7, l987 D. Ruderman, Jewish Thought and Scientific Discovery in Early Modern Europe, 1995, 2001 D. Ruderman, Jewish Enlightenment in an English Key: Anglo-Jewry’s Construction of Modern Jewish Thought, 2000 D.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSGENDER JEWS and HALAKHAH1 Rabbi Leonard A
    TRANSGENDER JEWS AND HALAKHAH1 Rabbi Leonard A. Sharzer MD This teshuvah was adopted by the CJLS on June 7, 2017, by a vote of 11 in favor, 8 abstaining. Members voting in favor: Rabbis Aaron Alexander, Pamela Barmash, Elliot Dorff, Susan Grossman, Reuven Hammer, Jan Kaufman, Gail Labovitz, Amy Levin, Daniel Nevins, Avram Reisner, and Iscah Waldman. Members abstaining: Rabbis Noah Bickart, Baruch Frydman- Kohl, Joshua Heller, David Hoffman, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Jonathan Lubliner, Micah Peltz, and Paul Plotkin. שאלות 1. What are the appropriate rituals for conversion to Judaism of transgender individuals? 2. What are the appropriate rituals for solemnizing a marriage in which one or both parties are transgender? 3. How is the marriage of a transgender person (which was entered into before transition) to be dissolved (after transition). 4. Are there any requirements for continuing a marriage entered into before transition after one of the partners transitions? 5. Are hormonal therapy and gender confirming surgery permissible for people with gender dysphoria? 6. Are trans men permitted to become pregnant? 7. How must healthcare professionals interact with transgender people? 8. Who should prepare the body of a transgender person for burial? 9. Are preoperative2 trans men obligated for tohorat ha-mishpahah? 10. Are preoperative trans women obligated for brit milah? 11. At what point in the process of transition is the person recognized as the new gender? 12. Is a ritual necessary to effect the transition of a trans person? The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halkhhah for the Conservative movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Shulchan Arukh Amy Milligan Old Dominion University, [email protected]
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Women's Studies Faculty Publications Women’s Studies 2010 Shulchan Arukh Amy Milligan Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/womensstudies_fac_pubs Part of the History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the Yiddish Language and Literature Commons Repository Citation Milligan, Amy, "Shulchan Arukh" (2010). Women's Studies Faculty Publications. 10. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/womensstudies_fac_pubs/10 Original Publication Citation Milligan, A. (2010). Shulchan Arukh. In D. M. Fahey (Ed.), Milestone documents in world religions: Exploring traditions of faith through primary sources (Vol. 2, pp. 958-971). Dallas: Schlager Group:. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Women’s Studies at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women's Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spanish Jews taking refuge in the Atlas Mountains in the fifteenth century (Spanish Jews taking refuge in the Atlas Mountains, illustration by Michelet c.1900 (colour litho), Bombled, Louis (1862-1927) / Private Collection / Archives Charmet / The Bridgeman Art Library International) 958 Milestone Documents of World Religions Shulchan Arukh 1570 ca. “A person should dress differently than he does on weekdays so he will remember that it is the Sabbath.” Overview Arukh continues to serve as a guide in the fast-paced con- temporary world. The Shulchan Arukh, literally translated as “The Set Table,” is a compilation of Jew- Context ish legal codes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Tort Liability in Maimonides
    CHAPTER 2 TORT LIABILITY IN MAIMONIDES’ CODE (MISHNEH TORAH): THE DOWNSIDE OF THE COMMON INTERPRETATION A. INTRODUCTION: THE MODERN STUDY OF JEWISH TORT THEORY AS A STORY OF “SELF- MIRRORING” B. THE OWNERSHIP AND STRICT LIABILITY THEORY VS. THE FAULT-BASED THEORY (PESHIAH) (1) The Difficulties of the Concept of Peshiah (2) The Common Interpretation of the Code: The “Ownership and Strict Liability Theory” C. EXEGETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL DIFFICULTIES OF THE COMMON INTERPRETATION OF MAIMONIDES (1) Maimonides did not Impose Comprehensive Strict Liability on the Tortfeasor (2) Maimonides’ Use of the Term Peshiah in Different Places (3) The Theory of Ownership Contradicts Various Rulings in the Code (4) The Problem with Finding a Convincing Rationale for the Ownership Theory D. DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING SOME ELEMENTS OF TORT LIABILITY MENTIONED IN THE CODE (1) Rulings that are Difficult to Interpret according to Either Ownership or Fault-Based Theories (2) Providing a Rationale for the Exemption in Tort (3) Standard of Care in Damages Caused by a Person to the Property of Another: Absolute/Strict Liability or Negligence? (4) Deterrence of Risk-Causing Behavior E. RE-EXAMINING THE OPENING CHAPTER OF THE BOOK OF TORTS IN THE CODE: CONTROL AS A CENTRAL ELEMENT OF LIABILITY IN TORT F. CONCLUSION 1 A. INTRODUCTION: THE MODERN STUDY OF JEWISH TORT THEORY AS A STORY OF “SELF- MIRRORING” Isidore Twersky showed us that “[t]o a great extent the study of Maimonides is a story of ‘self- mirroring’,”1 and that the answers given by modern and medieval scholars and rabbis to some questions on the concepts of Maimonides “were as different as their evaluations of Maimonides, tempered of course by their own ideological convictions and/or related contingencies.”2 Maimonides’ opening passages of the Book of Torts (Sefer Nezikin) in the Code (Mishneh Torah) can also be described as a story of “self-mirroring”.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Critiques of Rabbinic Law Through the Lens of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Andrea Pemberton
    The ART of Producing Responsa: Feminist Critiques of Rabbinic Law through the Lens of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Andrea Pemberton Prior to the mid-twentieth century, when assisted reproductive technologies (ART) stepped on to the medical scene, supplications and prayers to God were the primary means for religious Jewish couples to cope with the issue of infertility. However, with the advent of artificial insemination techniques, fertility hormones, in vitro fertilization, and surrogacy, new medical technologies have successfully generated proactive methods for infertile individuals to have biological children of their own. Yet as these controversial technologies emerge, and prove to be of interest and use to Jewish persons, rabbis are compelled to contend with this new and challenging issue. In an effort to comply with halakha, or rabbinic law, modern rabbis have interpreted ART in various ways, putting restrictions on certain forms and implementing guidelines for their use in general. For religious Orthodox Jews, halakha is a prominent feature of everyday life that influences his or her actions and interactions in the most direct way. Because of this observance, Orthodox couples undergoing fertility treatment and utilizing ART take seriously the guidance of their rabbis, who are seen as authorities on halakha. Consequently, a potential problem that emerges from the halakhic discourse on assisted reproductive technologies is that this set of symbolically-loaded medical procedures takes place within the female body, yet is dictated by the tractates of a male-dominated religious legal system. The purpose of this paper, then, is to utilize feminist critiques of gender bias in legal systems to critically analyze Orthodox rabbinic discourse on assisted reproductive technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Status of Abuse
    HM 424.1995 FAMILY VIOLENCE Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff Part 1: The Legal Status of Abuse This paper was approved by the CJT,S on September 13, 1995, by a vote of' sixteen in favor and one oppossed (16-1-0). V,,ting infiwor: Rabbis Kassel Abelson, Ben :Lion BerBm<m, Stephanie Dickstein, £/liot JY. Dorff, S/wshana Gelfand, Myron S. Geller, Arnold i'H. Goodman, Susan Crossman, Judah f(ogen, ~bnon H. Kurtz, Aaron L. iHaclder, Hwl 11/othin, 1'H(~yer HabinoLviiz, Joel /t.,'. Rembaum, Gerald Slwlnih, and E/ie Kaplan Spitz. hJting against: H.abbi Ceraicl Ze/izer. 1he Committee 011 .lnuish L(Lw and Standards qf the Rabhinical As:wmbly provides f};ztidance in matters (!f halakhnh for the Conservative movement. The individual rabbi, hou;evet~ is the authority for the interpretation and application of all maltrrs of halaklwh. 1. Reating: According to Jewish law as interpreted by the Conservative movement, under what circumstance, if any, may: A) husbands beat their wives, or wives their husbands? B) parents beat their children? c) adult children of either gender beat their elderly parents? 2. Sexual abu.se: What constitutes prohibited sexual abuse of a family member? 3· verbal abuse: What constitutes prohibited verbal abuse of a family member? TI1e Importance of the Conservative Legal Method to These Issues 1 In some ways, it would seem absolutely obvious that Judaism would nut allow individu­ als to beat others, especially a family member. After all, right up front, in its opening l T \VOuld like to express my sincere thanks to the members or the Committee on Jew·isll Law and Standards for their hdpfu I snggc:-;tions for impruving an earlier draft of this rcsponsum.
    [Show full text]
  • Mattos Chassidus on the Massei ~ Mattos Chassidus on the Parsha +
    LIGHTS OF OUR RIGHTEOUS TZADDIKIM בעזרת ה ' יתבר A Tzaddik, or righteous person , makes everyone else appear righteous before Hashem by advocating for them and finding their merits. Kedushas Levi, Parshas Noach (Bereishis 7:1) MATTOS ~ MASSEI _ CHASSIDUS ON THE PARSHA + Dvar Torah – Mattos Keep Your Word The Torah states (30:3), “If a man takes a vow or swears an oath to G -d to establish a prohibition upon himself, he shall not violate his word; he shall fulfill whatever comes out of his mouth.” In relation to this passuk , the Midrash quotes from Tehillim (144:4), “Our days are like a fleeting shadow.” What is the connection? This can be explained, says Rav Levi Yitzchok, according to a Gemara ( Nedarim 10b), which states, “It is forbidden to say, ‘ Lashem korban , for G-d − an offering.’ Instead a person must say, ‘ Korban Lashem , an offering for G -d.’ Why? Because he may die before he says the word korban , and then he will have said the holy Name in vain.” In this light, we can understand the Midrash. The Torah states that a person makes “a vow to G-d.” This i s the exact language that must be used, mentioning the vow first. Why? Because “our days are like a fleeting shadow,” and there is always the possibility that he may die before he finishes his vow and he will have uttered the Name in vain. n Story The wood chopper had come to Ryczywohl from the nearby village in which he lived, hoping to find some kind of employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Admissions Policy and Procedures
    YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM Admission Requirements Students applying to Yeshiva Toras Chaim must meet one of the following requirements: 1. Have graduated high school and provide evidence of high school graduation 2. Have been homeschooled and provide documentation of homeschooling 3. Meet one of the recognized equivalents. Recognized equivalents include: a. GED/TASC/HISET b. Successful completion of an associate’s degree program; c. Successful completion of at least 60 semester or trimester credit hours or 72 quarter credit hours that does not result in the awarding of an associate’s degree, but that is acceptable for full credit toward a bachelor’s degree at any institution; or d. Enrollment in a bachelor’s degree program where at least 60 semester or trimester credit hours or 72 quarter credit hours have been successfully completed, including credit hours transferred into the bachelor’s degree program. Applicants to Yeshiva Toras Chaim must also meet the following requirements. Competence in the Chumash (Pentateuch) and commentaries Completion of 150 folio pages of Talmud Competence in the laws and customs codified in Shulchan Aruch Orach Chaim, along with a personal commitment to their observance Positive references from previous schools attended A commitment to fulfilling the institution’s mission and to conforming to its culture A commitment to high standards of morality and character Yeshiva Toras Chaim does not utilize an Ability to Benefit test for admitting students. Additionally, students must have: . A commitment to develop in the personal growth of character traits, and ethical and moral obligations . An interview and oral exam administered by the Rosh Yeshiva Before being granted an interview applicants are carefully vetted by contacting previous instructors and/or Rosh Yeshiva to make sure they will be a “good fit” to the Yeshiva.
    [Show full text]
  • Maimonides' Contradictory Positions Regarding
    MAIMONIDES’ CONTRADICTORY POSITIONS REGARDING THE KARAITES: A STUDY IN MAIMONIDEAN JURISPRUDENCE Yuval Sinai Netanya Academic College The contradictory positions that appear in Maimonides’ various writ- ings regarding the appropriate treatment of Karaites and heretics have merited extensive discussion in both modern and traditional scholarship.1 The problem is this. In a number of responsa and in the Epistle to Teiman (Yemen), Maimonides expresses a consistent attitude of ideological and practical vehemence towards hereticism.2 Thus, in a responsum, Maimonides prohibits counting Karaites in a prayer-quorum (minyan) or even including them for purposes of the group recitation of the Grace after Meals (zimun).3 In another responsum he states that “divorces performed by Karaites have no validity as divorces according to our Law.”4 And in the Epistle to Teiman Maimonides expressed himself scathingly against Karaites and heretics:5 It is incumbent upon you to know that the rule that nothing may be added to or diminished from the laws of Moses applies equally to the Oral Law, that is, to the traditional interpretation transmitted through the sages of blessed memory. Be cautious and on your guard lest any 1 See, e.g., comments of Y. Kapach in the Commentary on M. Hul. 1:2, n. 33; J. Faur, Studies in Rambam’s Mishneh Torah, pp. 136–144 ( Jerusalem, 1978); I. Shailat, Letters and Essays of Moses Maimonides (Maaleh Adumim, 1988), pp. 142, and pp. 668–669; D. Lasker, “The Karaite’s Influence on the Rambam,” in Sefunot 68 (2) (1991), pp. 146–149; G. Blidstein, “Maimonides’ Approach to the Karaites,” in Tehumin 8, pp.
    [Show full text]