White Paper on Remixes, First Sale, and Statutory Damages

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

White Paper on Remixes, First Sale, and Statutory Damages White Paper on Remixes, First Sale, and Statutory Damages Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE INTERNET POLICY TASK FORCE January 2016 Message from Secretary Penny Pritzker Since the founding of our nation, the United States has recognized the importance of copyright in encouraging creative expression by incentivizing people to produce and share the works that contribute to America’s leading role as a cultural and economic powerhouse. Our copyright system plays a critical role in promoting and disseminating works of authorship and provides diverse benefits for large and small businesses, consumers, authors, artists, and workers in the information, entertainment, and technology sectors. A healthy copyright system strikes important balances between rights and exceptions— delineating what is protectable and what is not, determining which types of uses require permission or payment, and establishing appropriate frameworks to effectively protect rights and foster creativity and innovation. These balances must be reviewed regularly to ensure they continue to function well as a foundation for America’s culture and economy. The Internet has transformed the world by introducing new ways for people to communicate, create, innovate, and conduct business in the global digital economy. The goals of our national copyright policy and our global Internet policy should work in tandem. The U.S. Department of Commerce has played a key role in addressing Internet policy-related issues since it launched the Internet Policy Task Force in April 2010. Two years ago, the Task Force published a Green Paper on Copyright Policy, Creativity and Innovation in the Digital Economy—the most comprehensive assessment of digital copyright policy issued by any Administration since 1995. The review process that culminated in this White Paper serves as a testament to the importance the Administration has placed on the development of updated and balanced copyright law in the digital environment. We hope the White Paper will stimulate discussion and lead to adoption of our recommendations. We continue to recognize the importance that copyright law plays in the digital environment and why it is necessary to achieve a result that takes into account the interests of all stakeholders. We will remain engaged and monitor these and other areas of copyright policy to ensure that our copyright system continues to adapt and thrive, furthering the Constitutional goal of “promot[ing] the Progress of Science and useful Arts.” Penny Pritzker U.S. Secretary of Commerce i ii FOREWORD This White Paper by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Internet Policy Task Force addresses important issues at the intersection of copyright law and Internet policy. It is the result of a comprehensive, multi-year review of three key topics: 1) the legal framework for the creation of remixes; 2) the relevance and scope of the first sale doctrine in the digital environment; and 3) the application of statutory damages in the context of individual file-sharers and secondary liability for large-scale online infringement. Led by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), the Internet Policy Task Force conducted a public meeting at USPTO headquarters; received and reviewed dozens of comments from a range of stakeholders including rights holder organizations, Internet-based companies, public interest groups, libraries, academics, and individual authors and artists; and held roundtables around the country to create a record upon which to analyze those issues.The input we received over the last two years has further underscored the importance that copyright law continues to play in the digital environment. Each section of the White Paper provides recommendations based on the stakeholder input received.In some areas, we believe now is the right time to consider legislative solutions.In others, we recommend bringing stakeholders together to develop best practices. We also recognize that the changing nature of market conditions and technology may call for future re- evaluation of some of our conclusions. This White Paper reflects indispensable contributions from members of our staffs who organized the consultation processes and engaged in the tasks of analysis and writing. At USPTO, the project was led by Shira Perlmutter, Chief Policy Officer and Director for International Affairs, working with a team including David Carson, Susan Allen, Ann Chaitovitz, and Ben Golant. The NTIA team was led by John Morris, Associate Administrator, working with Winter Casey, Camille Fischer, and Luis Zambrano Ramos. We appreciate the contributions of other agencies in the Administration that reviewed the White Paper and whose comments greatly improved the final draft. We are also grateful to the United States Copyright Office, and in particular to Associate Registers Karyn Temple Claggett, Director of Policy and International Affairs, and Jacqueline Charlesworth, General Counsel, for their participation in a number of our public discussions and for their valuable input on the Copyright Office initiatives mentioned in the White Paper. Effective and balanced copyright protection is critical in today’s digital environment. We are confident that the recommendations outlined in the White Paper will help advance copyright policy and ensure that the United States' creative and innovative industries can continue to strengthen our nation's culture and economy. Michelle K. Lee Lawrence E. Strickling Under Secretary of Commerce for Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Intellectual Property and Director, Administrator, National U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Telecommunications and Information Administration iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. OVERVIEW OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................. 4 A. REMIXES ............................................................................................................................... 4 B. FIRST SALE ........................................................................................................................... 4 C. STATUTORY DAMAGES ......................................................................................................... 5 III. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE CREATION OF REMIX ............................... 6 A. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 B. STAKEHOLDER VIEWS ........................................................................................................... 6 1. The Different Worlds of Remix ....................................................................................... 6 2. Legal Doctrines .............................................................................................................. 10 a. Fair Use....................................................................................................................... 10 b. Guidelines and Best Practices ..................................................................................... 11 c. Possible Changes in the Law ...................................................................................... 17 3. Current and Developing Licensing Mechanisms ........................................................... 19 4. The Relationship between Licensing and Fair Use ........................................................ 22 C. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................ 23 1. Overview ........................................................................................................................ 23 2. Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 24 a. Provide Greater Clarity for Fair Use: Guidelines and Best Practices ......................... 27 b. Improve Voluntary Licensing Options ....................................................................... 29 i. Micro-Licensing ...................................................................................................... 31 ii. Collective Licensing ............................................................................................... 32 iii. Intermediary Licensing ........................................................................................... 32 c. Sharing of Revenues Generated by Remixes ............................................................. 33 3. Relationship to Other Task Force Recommendations .................................................... 33 IV. FIRST SALE DOCTRINE AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSIONS .................................... 35 A. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 35 B. STAKEHOLDER VIEWS ......................................................................................................... 36 1. Benefits of the First Sale Doctrine ................................................................................. 36 a. Resale or Gift .............................................................................................................. 36 b. Lending or Rental ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • How Open Source Is Changing IP Risk in the Soft Ware Supply Chain
    A New Wave of IP Risks: How Open Source is Changing IP Risk in the Software Supply Chain Table of Contents Introduction . 3 Brief Overview of Open Source and Where It Stands Today . 3 The Interplay Between Open Source and IP Risk: . 5 Understanding the Challenges Specific IP Risks in the Open Source Software Supply Chain . 7 Copyright Infringement . 7 Reputation . 9 Exposing IP Secrets . 10 Impacts on the Partner/Customer Relationship . 11 Patent Infringement . 12 Looking Ahead: The Future of Open Source Litigation . 13 Conclusion . 14 I. Introduction Open source software has been integrated into nearly is a testament to the success of open source, it also gives every industry and sector today . According to a 2016 rise to unique challenges for businesses, particularly in survey, approximately 90% of today’s organizations report the area of intellectual property . If a company cannot using open source software .1 That percentage has almost even find all of its open source code or identify its open certainly grown since . One likely reason for open source’s source dependencies, they are also likely unable to boom in popularity is the distinct cost savings it gives ensure that they are remaining compliant with open companies who use it .2 The use of open source software is source licenses and protecting themselves from business now so widespread that many companies are unaware of or reputational risk . how and where it is used, and would be unable to identify all their open source code if asked to do so . In this paper, we will examine the most common IP risks that arise from the use of open source software today, As Mark Radcliffe, a partner in the Silicon Valley office of including copyright infringement, patent infringement, DLA Piper specializing in IP and open source, explains, reputational risk, exposure of IP secrets, and the impact on “virtually all software now has a large number of open the partner/customer relationship .
    [Show full text]
  • An N U Al R Ep O R T 2018 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT The Annual Report in English is a translation of the French Document de référence provided for information purposes. This translation is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Document de référence. The Annual Report is available on the Company’s website www.vivendi.com II –— VIVENDI –— ANNUAL REPORT 2018 –— –— VIVENDI –— ANNUAL REPORT 2018 –— 01 Content QUESTIONS FOR YANNICK BOLLORÉ AND ARNAUD DE PUYFONTAINE 02 PROFILE OF THE GROUP — STRATEGY AND VALUE CREATION — BUSINESSES, FINANCIAL COMMUNICATION, TAX POLICY AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT — NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 04 1. Profile of the Group 06 1 2. Strategy and Value Creation 12 3. Businesses – Financial Communication – Tax Policy and Regulatory Environment 24 4. Non-financial Performance 48 RISK FACTORS — INTERNAL CONTROL AND RISK MANAGEMENT — COMPLIANCE POLICY 96 1. Risk Factors 98 2. Internal Control and Risk Management 102 2 3. Compliance Policy 108 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF VIVENDI — COMPENSATION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS OF VIVENDI — GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANY 112 1. Corporate Governance of Vivendi 114 2. Compensation of Corporate Officers of Vivendi 150 3 3. General Information about the Company 184 FINANCIAL REPORT — STATUTORY AUDITORS’ REPORT ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — STATUTORY AUDITORS’ REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — STATUTORY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 196 Key Consolidated Financial Data for the last five years 198 4 I – 2018 Financial Report 199 II – Appendix to the Financial Report 222 III – Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 223 IV – 2018 Statutory Financial Statements 319 RECENT EVENTS — OUTLOOK 358 1. Recent Events 360 5 2. Outlook 361 RESPONSIBILITY FOR AUDITING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 362 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 30 Spring 2014
    SYRACUSE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LAW VOLUME 30 SPRING 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Mass Copyright Infringement Litigation: Of Trolls, Pornography, Settlement and Joinder Christopher Civil………………………………………………………………………………...2 Notice and Manifestation of Assent to Browse-Wrap Agreements in the Age of Evolving Crawlers, Bots, Spiders and Scrapers: How Courts Are Tethered to Their Application of Register and Cairo and Why Congress Should Mandate Use of the Robots Exclusion Standard to Prevent Circumvention of Responsibility Michael Laven…………………………………………………………………………………..56 Seeing Red: Christian Louboutin’s Protection of His Trademark Through His Battle with Yves St. Laurent Sachpreet Bains…………………………………………………………………………………73 I Need a Lawyer: Establishing Statewide New York Communication Access Fund to Secure Legal Accessibility to Deaf and Hard of Hearing Clients Through Video Remote Interpreting Services in Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act YooNa Lim………………………………………………………………………………………99 Can You Hear Me Now? Spectrum is Shaping the Telecommunication Industry in an Increasingly Connected America James Zino……………………………………………………………………………………..131 Review of “I Know What You’re Thinking: Brain Imaging and Mental Privacy” Edited by: Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees, and Sarah J.L. Edwards Jenna Furman…………………………………………………………………………………160 SYRACUSE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LAW VOLUME 30 SPRING 2014 2013-2014 EDITORIAL STAFF EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Brittany Jones MANAGING EDITOR Tanjeev Thandi LEAD ARTICLE EDITORS FORM & ACCURACY EDITORS Alessandra
    [Show full text]
  • Free Views Tiktok
    Free Views Tiktok Free Views Tiktok CLICK HERE TO ACCESS TIKTOK GENERATOR tiktok auto liker hack In July 2021, "The Wall Street Journal" reported the company's annual revenue to be approximately $800 million with a loss of $70 million. By May 2021, it was reported that the video-sharing app generated $5.2 billion in revenue with more than 500 million users worldwide.", free vending machine code tiktok free pro tiktok likes and followers free tiktok fans without downloading any apps The primary difference between Tencent’s WeChat and ByteDance’s Toutiao is that the former has yet to capitalize on the addictive nature of short-form videos, whereas the latter has. TikTok — the latter’s new acquisition — is a comparatively more simple app than its parent company, but it does fit in well with Tencent’s previous acquisition of Meitu, which is perhaps better known for its beauty apps.", In an article published by The New York Times, it was claimed that "An app with more than 500 million users can’t seem to catch a break. From pornography to privacy concerns, there have been quite few controversies surrounding TikTok." It continued by saying that "A recent class-action lawsuit alleged that the app poses health and privacy risks to users because of its allegedly discriminatory algorithm, which restricts some content and promotes other content." This article was published on The New York Times.", The app has received criticism from users for not creating revenue and posting ads on videos which some see as annoying. The app has also been criticized for allowing children younger than age 13 to create videos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fuzzy Software Patent Debate Rages On
    OPINION The Fuzzy Software Patent Debate Rages On By Heather J. Meeker LinuxInsider 02/23/05 5:00 AM PT Once upon a time, we intellectual property lawyers got to live peacefully in our ivory towers. Now it seems that intellectual property policy issues have become fraught with partisan rhetoric. Most open-source promoters are against software patents. Most corporate spokesmen side with patents, period, whether they cover software or not. But it is worth looking beyond the rhetoric. The European Commission recently tolled the death knell for the EU Software Patent Directive, or more precisely, the "Directive on the Patentability of Computer- Implemented Inventions." Like most Americans, I am fairly clueless about the EU political process, and I wouldn't presume to write about exactly how it was killed. But the decision may have been swayed by an eleventh-hour public relations pitch against the directive by open-source spokesmen from the United States. On that aspect, I will add my two cents. A delegation of open-source leaders, led by Linus Torvalds, published an "Appeal" at softwarepatents.com, calling software patents "dangerous to the economy at large, and particularly to the European economy." Look Beyond the Rhetoric Leaders of the open-source software movement have long been harsh critics of software patents. The GPL [license] itself says, "any free program is threatened constantly by software patents." The appeal contends that copyright provides adequate protection for the creations of software authors. The Appeal advocated reliance on copyright law, rather than patent law, for the protection of software. Not long afterward, in late January, the European Parliament's Legal Affairs Committee recommended scrapping the pending directive, extending the debate until at least the end From www.linuxinsider.com/story/40676.html 1 April 2011 of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • How Eliminating Search and Index Functionality Reduces Secondary Liability in Peer-To-Peer File-Sharing Cases Luke M
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UW Law Digital Commons (University of Washington) Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts Volume 7 | Issue 1 Article 4 7-1-2011 Off with the Head? How Eliminating Search and Index Functionality Reduces Secondary Liability in Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Cases Luke M. Rona Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjlta Part of the Internet Law Commons Recommended Citation Luke M. Rona, Off with the Head? How Eliminating Search and Index Functionality Reduces Secondary Liability in Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Cases, 7 Wash. J. L. Tech. & Arts 27 (2011). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wjlta/vol7/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rona: Off with the Head? How Eliminating Search and Index Functionality WASHINGTON JOURNAL OF LAW, TECHNOLOGY & ARTS VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1 SUMMER 2011 OFF WITH THE HEAD? HOW ELIMINATING SEARCH AND INDEX FUNCTIONALITY REDUCES SECONDARY LIABILITY IN PEER-TO-PEER FILE-SHARING CASES Luke M. Rona* © Luke M. Rona CITE AS: 7 Wash J.L. Tech. & Arts 27 (2011) http://digital.law.washington.edu/dspace-law/handle/1773.1/1050 ABSTRACT Peer-to-peer file-sharing service providers (P2Ps) allow Internet users to exchange electronic content, including music, movies, and other digital works.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Terrica Carrington Vice President
    Statement of Terrica Carrington Vice President, Legal Policy & Copyright Counsel Copyright Alliance before the HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY September 30, 2020 Good afternoon, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Jordan and members of the House Judiciary Committee, and thank you for the opportunity to testify at today’s hearing titled, “Copyright and the Internet in 2020: Reactions to the Copyright Office’s Report on the Efficacy of 17 U.S.C. § 512 After Two Decades.” My name is Terrica Carrington and I am VP, Legal Policy & Copyright Counsel at the Copyright Alliance, a non-profit, non-partisan public interest and educational organization dedicated to advocating policies that promote and preserve the value of copyright, and to protecting the rights of creators and innovators. The Copyright Alliance represents the copyright interests of over 13,000 organizations in the United States, across the spectrum of copyright disciplines, and over 1.8 million individual creators, including photographers, authors, songwriters, coders, bloggers, artists and many more individual creators and small businesses that rely on copyright law to protect their creativity, efforts, and investments in the creation and distribution of new copyrighted works for the public to enjoy. One of the greatest threats to the welfare of the creative community is piracy. Piracy is a persistent and evolving problem for virtually all types of copyrighted works and copyright owners and undermines the rights of creators and the value of copyright. It is essential that the copyright industries, including the millions of individual creators and small businesses across the country that rely on copyright law, be able to recoup their investments in order to fund the next wave of investment, create and distribute quality content for the public to enjoy, and ensure job stability for the nearly 5.7 million men and women these industries employ in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Blu-Raydefinition.Com » X — the Unheard Music: Silver Edition Blu-Ray
    Blu-rayDefinition.com » X — The Unheard Music: Silver Edition Blu-ray... http://www.blu-raydefinition.com/reviews/x-the-unheard-music-silver-edi... User Name Remember Me? Password Register Blu-rayDefinition.com Home News Reviews Hardware Contact Forum Community Movie Genre 20th Century Fox (91) 2L (5) A&E (15) ABC Family (1) ABC Studios (1) Accentus (7) Action (283) Adult Swim (2) Adventure (62) AIX (2) Anchor Bay Entertainment (39) Animation (157) Anime (82) Art House (44) Arthaus Musik (12) Artificial Eye (8) Asian Cinema (55) Astronomy (4) Australian (1) Automotive (4) Avant-garde (8) Ballet (15) BBC (41) Bel Air Classiques (1) BFI (31) Biopic (33) Blu-ray 3D (20) Blu-ray Audio (18) Blues (1) Bounty Films (2) British (52) 1 of 22 1/4/2012 2:20 PM Blu-rayDefinition.com » X — The Unheard Music: Silver Edition Blu-ray... http://www.blu-raydefinition.com/reviews/x-the-unheard-music-silver-edi... C Major (16) Capitol Records (2) Cartoon Network (4) Chamber Music (1) Chelsea Cinema (1) Choral/Oratorio (1) Classic Rock (3) Classical Music (85) Columbia Pictures (2) Columbia Records (1) Comedy (208) Comedy Central (2) Comic Books/Graphic Novels (19) Concert/Music (75) Crime (109) Criterion (50) Czech Language (1) Dacapo (1) Dance (16) Dark Comedy (20) Dark Sky Films (1) Demoscene (1) Dimension Films (2) Direct-to-Video (8) Discovery Channel (1) DisneyNature (3) Docudrama (31) Documentary (84) Drama (416) DreamWorks (6) Eagle Rock (32) Educational (19) Entertainment One (3) Environmental (1) Erotic (16) Eureka Entertainment (18) EuroArts (8) Exploitation (8) Fairy Tales (3) Family (34) Fan Service (2) Fantasy (96) Foreign (117) Fox Searchlight (9) French Language (22) French New Wave (8) Funimation (65) Fusecon (1) FX (1) German Language (1) Gospel/Christian Contemporary (1) 2 of 22 1/4/2012 2:20 PM Blu-rayDefinition.com » X — The Unheard Music: Silver Edition Blu-ray..
    [Show full text]
  • Monetizing Infringement
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2020 Monetizing Infringement Kristelia García University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Citation Information Kristelia García, Monetizing Infringement, 54 U.C. DAVIS L. REV. 265 (2020), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/1308. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monetizing Infringement Kristelia García* The deterrence of copyright infringement and the evils of piracy have long been an axiomatic focus of both legislators and scholars. The conventional view is that infringement must be curbed and/or punished in order for copyright to fulfill its purported goals of incentivizing creation and ensuring access to works. This Essay proves this view false by demonstrating that some rightsholders don’t merely tolerate, but actually encourage infringement, both explicitly and implicitly, in a variety of different situations and for one common reason: they benefit from it.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case: 10-55946 04/03/2013 ID: 8576455 DktEntry: 66 Page: 1 of 114 Docket No. 10-55946 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, TRISTAR PICTURES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLLP, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS, LLLP and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GARY FUNG and ISOHUNT WEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. _______________________________________ Appeal from a Decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. 06-CV-05578 · Honorable Stephen V. Wilson PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC BY APPELLANTS GARY FUNG AND ISOHUNT WEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IRA P. ROTHKEN, ESQ. ROBERT L. KOVSKY, ESQ. JARED R. SMITH, ESQ. ROTHKEN LAW FIRM 3 Hamilton Landing, Suite 280 Novato, California 94949 (415) 924-4250 Telephone (415) 924-2905 Facsimile Attorneys for Appellants, Gary Fung and isoHunt Web Technologies, Inc. COUNSEL PRESS · (800) 3-APPEAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Case: 10-55946 04/03/2013 ID: 8576455 DktEntry: 66 Page: 2 of 114 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Index of Authorities ..….....….....….....….....….....….....….....….....…....…... ii I. The Panel Decision Applies Erroneous Legal Standards to Find ..…... 1 Fung Liable on Disputed Facts and to Deny Him a Trial by Jury II. The Panel Decision and the District Court Opinion Combine to ……... 5 Punish Speech that Should Be Protected by the First Amendment III. The Panel Decision Expands the Grokster Rule in Multiple Ways ….. 7 that Threaten the Future of Technological Innovation A. The “Technological Background” set forth in the Panel ……….
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Singles Chart Rules
    Rules for Chart Eligibility for the IRMA Official Charts Singles Adopted by the Board of IRMA on the 30th June 2021 Rules for Irish Chart Eligibility June 2021 INTRODUCTION The following Chart Rules exist to determine eligibility for entry into the Irish Recorded Music Association CLG (IRMA) Official Charts. The aim of the Rules is to protect the integrity of the Charts and to ensure that they are an accurate reflection of the popularity of each recording by reference to genuine transactions. The Rules apply not only to members of IRMA but equally to all record producers and/or distributors of records. They set out the conditions upon which a record will be eligible for inclusion in the Charts. It should be noted that record producers and distributors remain free to package and market their products in any way they choose. However, releases which do not comply with the Rules will not be eligible to be included in the IRMA Official Charts. The Chart Rules are issued by the Official Charts UK Company (OCC) and IRMA. OCC is responsible for interpreting and applying the Chart Rules on a day-to-day basis under the supervision of IRMA. OCC may, at its discretion, refer any matter concerning the interpretation of the Chart Rules with respect to one or more recordings to the Council of Inquiry set up by IRMA, for a decision. A record producer or distributor that wishes to dispute a decision made by OCC may also apply to the Council of Inquiry of IRMA for a decision. The decision of the Council of Inquiry will be final.
    [Show full text]
  • Content & Technology Policy Report May
    1800 M Street NW | 5th Floor | Washington D.C. 20036 Tel: (202) 327-8100 | Fax: (202) 327-8101 CONTENT & TECHNOLOGY POLICY REPORT MAY 6, 2016 I. Congressional Updates: The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law has scheduled a hearing on May 11 at 2:30PM on Headlines and Highlights: “Examining the Proposed FCC Privacy Rules.” The hearing will feature witness testimony from Federal Communications The Supreme Court agrees Commission (FCC) Chairman Thomas Wheeler, FCC to hear case with Commissioner Ajit Pai, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) implications for copyright- Chairwoman Edith Ramirez, and FTC Commissioner Maureen eligibility Ohlhausen. The Copyright Office holds The House Ways and Means Tax Policy Subcommittee has public roundtables on its scheduled a hearing on Member proposals for improvements section 512 study to the U.S. tax system. The hearing will take place on May 12 at 10:00AM. Oral testimony will be limited to Members of TTIP leak reveals EU Congress who have either introduced or cosponsored tax concerns over protracted legislation. Notably, Subcommittee Chairman Charles U.S. copyright review Boustany (R-LA) and his colleague Richard Neal (D-MA) released a bipartisan discussion draft in 2015 for an Chinese Sci-Hub domain is “innovation box”; the draft legislation would create a shut down preferential tax rate for income derived from certain IP. In the Blogs: The Senate Finance Committee has scheduled an oversight hearing of the Customs and Border Protection Agency (CBP) Copyright Q&A on May 11 at 10:00AM. CBP Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske Copyright Alliance is scheduled to testify as the sole witness at the hearing.
    [Show full text]