DOCSLIB.ORG

Submissions Cover Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submissions Cover Sheet Submissions cover sheet Post your submission with this cover sheet to: Submissions 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission GPO Box 4358, Melbourne VIC 3001 Email your submission with this cover sheet to: [email protected] Title: Mr First Name: David Surname: Maughan / Organisation represented by your submission (if applicable): I Private submission Email address: Postal address: Telephone: IXI Policy, preparation and planning of governments, emergency services Buildings Preparation and planning by communities and households I3 Insurance Response to the bushfires Other (please state): Dangers of wind turbines in bushfire prone areas. $ 1 McHarg Ranges, Tooborac, Central Victoria I Please provide a general description of what materials you are providing as part of your submission I (eg. Letter; document; DVD, photos. Please do not send originals): I Letter, documents already in Commissions hands. I 1 Letter from Department of Planning & Community Dev. I Confidentiality The Commission will consider all requests for confidentiality. Should you wish for your submission, or parts of your submission, to be treated as confidential, please clearly state the reason in the space provided below. If you require more room, please attach a separate page and provide together with your submission. Should the Commission consider the request for confidentiality not to be appropriate you will be provided with an opportunity to withdraw your submission or re-submit it in a form suitable for publication. Please select one of the following options IX] I acknowledge that my submission will be treated as a public document and may be published, quoted or summarised by the Commission. I request that my submission, or parts of my submission, be treated as confidential, and not published quoted or summarised by the Commission, for the reasons stated here: Acknowledgements I understand that: I can be contacted by the Royal Commission in relation to my submission. Anonymous submissions will not be accepted. The name and town or suburb of each submitter will be identified as part of every published submission. Other contact details will be removed before publishing. The Commission will not publish submissions if it believes that the submission material is or could be n or anti-vilification legislation or is outside the scope Or if sending electronically please&onfinn your acknowledgment by ticking this box Date 11.4.201 0 Department of Planning and Community Development I Spr~ngStreet , 5 Melbourne Victoria 3000 GPO Box 2392 Melboume Victoria 300 1 Our Ref: CMINO1785'2 Australia File: PL-PW05/0153 Telephone: (03) 9208 3333 Facsimile (03) 9208 3680 www.dpcd.vic.gov.au Mr Peter McLaughlin 0 1 APR 2010 Dear Mr McLaughlin WIND ENERGY FACILITY - MCHARG RANGES Thank you for the correspondence tabled at our meeting on 26 February 2010 with Justin Madden MLC, Minister for Planning, Mr Ben Hardman NIP, Mr David Maughan and Mr Ian Rhode, which raises a number of matters relating to the development of a Wind Energy Facility ("WEF") in the McHarg Ranges. In considering your comments I have confined my response to the planning issues that have been raised. Amendment C32 to the Mitchell Planning Scheme was prepared by Mitchell Shire Council at the request of the CFA. A public information session was held in January 2005, at the CFA station in Seymour, and CFA officers also took part in a number of meetings with landowners on selected properties. I can advise that prior to Amendment C32, only the western and Seymour areas of the shire were affected by the Wildfire Management Overlay (WMO), as the Overlay was previously only in the former McIvor and Seymour Planning Schemes that are now incorporated in the new format Mitchell Scheme. This is because the Shire of Mitchell (which was created in November 1994) comprises parts of the former Rural City of Seymour and areas of the former Shires of Broadford and McIvor, and all of the former Shires of Pyalong and Kilmore. Only the former Rural City of Seymour and the former Shire of McIvor had identified fire prone areas in their planning scheme maps. A Planning Panel was appointed in June 2005 to consider and hear submissions and prepare a report on the amendment. In discussing the WMO Site Selection Criteria the Panel noted that the WMO was "based on criteria considered valid at the time of its introduction but is inconsistent with that currently in use, and which would not satisJL present day assessment methodology. ,, Privacy Statement Any persor~oliiformatiorr abotrt yo11 or. a tlrird party 01 yoto. correspondence will be protected tmder the pravisioru of' the Information Privacy Act 2000. It will only be rued or disclosed to appropriate Ministerial, Stahltory The PlaceTo Be A~rtlrority,or depnrtrner~talstaff in regard to tlre p~rrposefor wliiclr it war provided, rinless required or a~rfl~orbedby law. Enqtriries about access to inforntatiorl abotit yo11 held by t11e Department sl1011ldbe directed to the Manager- Privacy, Department ofP1annirrg and Con~n~rrr~i@Developnter~t, PO Box 500, Eart Melbolirne, 3002. Overall, Amendment C32 increased the areas to which the Wildfire Management Overlay applied, with particular areas affected being the Tallarook area, Wandong area, land west of Beveridge, land south of Pyalong, land north of Tooborac and the Strathbogie Ranges area in the northeast. In relation to your comments regarding the New South Wales Parliament's General Purpose Standing Committee Number 5 ("the Committee") into rural wind farms, it is noted that the report of the Committee was tabled on 16 December 2009 and that the NSW Government is yet to provide a response to the recommendations. Executive Director Planning Services & Development Facilitation .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Victoria Government Gazette No
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 346 Thursday 9 July 2020 By Authority of Victorian Government Printer Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 Section 200 DIRECTION FROM DEPUTY CHIEF HEALTH OFFICER (COMMUNICABLE DISEASE) IN ACCORDANCE WITH EMERGENCY POWERS ARISING FROM DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY Area Directions (No. 3) I, Dr Annaliese van Diemen, Deputy Chief Health Officer (Communicable Disease), consider it reasonably necessary to protect public health to give the following directions pursuant to section 200(1)(b) and (d) of the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic.) (PHW Act): 1 Preamble (1) The purpose of these directions is to address the serious public health risk posed to Victoria by Novel Coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV). (2) These directions identify areas within Victoria which have a higher prevalence of, or risk of exposure to, 2019-nCoV and which are subject to specific directions which are reasonably necessary to protect public health. (3) These directions must be read together with the Directions currently in force. 2 Citation (1) These directions may be referred to as the Area Directions (No. 3). (2) A reference in any other direction to the Area Directions or the Area Directions (No. 2) is taken to be a reference to these directions. 3 Commencement and revocation (1) These directions apply beginning at 11:59:00 pm on 8 July 2020 and ending at 11:59:00 pm on 19 July 2020. (2) The Area Directions (No. 2) are revoked at 11:59:00 pm on 8 July 2020. 4 Restricted Area For the purposes of the Directions currently in force, the Restricted Area means the aggregate area consisting of the municipal districts, suburbs, localities and addresses within greater Melbourne and the Shire of Mitchell.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020
    Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020 Version: 1.1 Date approved: 22 December 2015 Reviewed: 15 January 2019 Responsible Department: Planning Related policies: Nil 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 5 4 Scope .................................................................................................................... 5 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 6 Gambling and EGMs in the City of Casey ........................................................... 6 7 City of Casey Position on Electronic Gaming Machines ................................... 7 7.1 Advocacy & Partnerships ....................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Economy ....................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Consultation & Information Provision ...................................................................... 9 7.4 Community Wellbeing ............................................................................................ 9 7.5 Planning Assessment ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Policy
    Drivers of land use change Driver Research Phase Background Report No. 9 Land use policy Department of Sustainability and Environment Department of Primary Industries Author John Ford For more information about this publication contact John Ford, Social Research Officer, Department of Primary Industries, Office and Institute of Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture, Tatura, Victoria 3616. Phone: (03) 5833 5222 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The author would like to thank regional agency staff and organisations for their assistance in the development of this report, in particular the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority and Strathbogie Shire Council. The Drivers of Land Use Change (DLUC) project is funded under the Ecologically Sustainable Agriculture Initiative (a joint initiative of the Department of Primary Industries and the Department of Sustainability and Environment). © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, September 2004 This publication is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior written permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Primary Industries. All requests and enquiries should be directed to the Nominated Officer, Copyright, 5/250 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002. ISBN 1 74152 100 9 Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The District Encompasses Central Victoria and the Lower Part of Central New South Wales
    The District encompasses central Victoria and the lower part of central New South Wales. It extends north to Deniliquin, across to Holbrook, Corryong and south to Melbourne's northern suburbs from Heidelberg to Eltham in the east and Sunbury in the west. Rotary District 9790, Australia consists of 61 Clubs and approximately 1800 members. The Rotary Club of Albury is the oldest in the District, being admitted to Rotary International on 2nd November, 1927. In 1927 the District system was first introduced and Albury was in District 65, the territory being the whole of Australia. Other Clubs of our present District followed; Corowa (July) 1939 and Benalla (November) 1939, Wangaratta 1940, Euroa and Yarrawonga-Mulwala 1946, and Shepparton 1948. In 1949 District 65 became District 28, being Tasmania, part of Victoria east of longitude 144 Degrees and part of New South Wales. Deniliquin came in 1950, Wodonga 1953, Myrtleford, Cobram and Seymour 1954 and Heidelberg and Coburg 1956. In 1957 Districts were renumbered and District 28 became District 280, then came Numurkah 1957, Bright and Finley 1959, Kyabram and Preston 1960, Tatura and Broadmeadows 1962, Albury North and Nathalia 1963, Tallangatta and Mooroopna 1964, followed by Alexandra and Thomastown in 1966, Mansfield and Corryong 1967, Greenborough 1968, Reservoir 1969, Albury West 1970 and Appin Park 1972 (now Appin Park Wangaratta). On July 1, 1972 District 280 was divided into two, and the above Clubs became the new District 279. Since then the following Clubs have been admitted to Rotary International: Kilmore/Broadford (1972) (now Southern Mitchell); Sunbury, Eltham, Beechworth and Heidelberg North (1973) (now Rosanna); Shepparton South and Belvoir-Wodonga (1974); Fawkner (1975); Pascoe Vale (1976); Strathmore-Gladstone Park (1977) (now Strathmore), Albury Hume and Healesville (1977); Shepparton Central (1983); Wodonga West (1984); Tocumwal, Lavington, Craigieburn, Holbrook and Mount Beauty (1985); Jerilderie, Yea and Bellbridge Lake Hume (1986); Rutherglen, Bundoora and Nagambie (1987).
    [Show full text]
  • European Cultural Heritage Assessment
    Cultural Heritage Assessment Report European Cultural Heritage Assessment. Kilmore‐ Wallan Bypass Historical Assessment. Heritage Victoria Report 4066 By: Vicki Vaskos, Laura Donati and Fiona Schultz Date: 19 November 2012 Client Name: VicRoads Kilmore‐ Wallan Bypass Historical Assessment. Heritage Victoria Report 4066 European Cultural Heritage Assessment. Kilmore‐ Wallan Bypass Historical Assessment. Heritage Victoria Report 4066 By: Vicki Vaskos, Laura Donati and Fiona Schultz Date: 19 November 2012 Client Name: VicRoads VR08 Page | ii Kilmore‐ Wallan Bypass Historical Assessment. Heritage Victoria Report 4066 Ownership and Disclaimer Ownership of the intellectual property rights of ethnographic information provided by Aboriginal people remains the property of those named persons. Ownership of the primary materials created in the course of the research remains the property of Australian Cultural Heritage Management (Victoria) Pty Ltd. This report remains the property of VicRoads. This report may not be used, copied, sold, published, reproduced or distributed wholly or in part without the prior written consent of VicRoads. The professional advice and opinions contained in this report are those of the consultants, Australian Cultural Heritage Management (Victoria) Pty Ltd, and do not represent the opinions and policies of any third party. The professional advice and opinions contained in this report do not constitute legal advice. Spatial Data Spatial data captured by Australian Cultural Heritage Management (Victoria) Pty Ltd in this
    [Show full text]
  • List of Parishes in the State of Victoria
    List of Parishes in the State of Victoria Showing the County, the Land District, and the Municipality in which each is situated. (extracted from Township and Parish Guide, Department of Crown Lands and Survey, 1955) Parish County Land District Municipality (Shire Unless Otherwise Stated) Acheron Anglesey Alexandra Alexandra Addington Talbot Ballaarat Ballaarat Adjie Benambra Beechworth Upper Murray Adzar Villiers Hamilton Mount Rouse Aire Polwarth Geelong Otway Albacutya Karkarooc; Mallee Dimboola Weeah Alberton East Buln Buln Melbourne Alberton Alberton West Buln Buln Melbourne Alberton Alexandra Anglesey Alexandra Alexandra Allambee East Buln Buln Melbourne Korumburra, Narracan, Woorayl Amherst Talbot St. Arnaud Talbot, Tullaroop Amphitheatre Gladstone; Ararat Lexton Kara Kara; Ripon Anakie Grant Geelong Corio Angahook Polwarth Geelong Corio Angora Dargo Omeo Omeo Annuello Karkarooc Mallee Swan Hill Annya Normanby Hamilton Portland Arapiles Lowan Horsham (P.M.) Arapiles Ararat Borung; Ararat Ararat (City); Ararat, Stawell Ripon Arcadia Moira Benalla Euroa, Goulburn, Shepparton Archdale Gladstone St. Arnaud Bet Bet Ardno Follett Hamilton Glenelg Ardonachie Normanby Hamilton Minhamite Areegra Borug Horsham (P.M.) Warracknabeal Argyle Grenville Ballaarat Grenville, Ripon Ascot Ripon; Ballaarat Ballaarat Talbot Ashens Borung Horsham Dunmunkle Audley Normanby Hamilton Dundas, Portland Avenel Anglesey; Seymour Goulburn, Seymour Delatite; Moira Avoca Gladstone; St. Arnaud Avoca Kara Kara Awonga Lowan Horsham Kowree Axedale Bendigo; Bendigo
    [Show full text]
  • North-West-Victoria-Historic-Mining-Plots-Dunolly
    NORTH WEST VICTORIA HISTORIC MINING PLOTS (DUNOLLY, HEATHCOTE, MALDON AND RUSHWORTH) 1850-1980 Historic Notes David Bannear Heritage Victoria CONTENTS: Dunolly 3 Heathcote 48 Maldon 177 Rushworth 268 DUNOLLY GENERAL HISTORY PHASE ONE 1853/55: The Moliagul Police Camp had been down at the bottom end of Commissioners Gully near Burnt Creek from January 1853 until June 1855. This camp included a Sub Inspector, two Sergeants, a Corporal, six mounted and twelve-foot Constables, a Postmaster, Clerk and Tent Keeper. For a while this was the headquarters for the entire Mining District. 1 1853 Moliagul: Opened in 1853 along with Surface Gully. Their richness influenced the moving of the settlement from Commissioners Gully to where the township is now. 2 1853: Burnt Creek, the creek itself, was so-called before gold digging started, but Burnt Creek goldfield, situated about two miles south of Dunolly, started with the discovery of gold early in 1853, and at a rush later that year ... Between August and October 1853 the Commissioners’ Camp at Jones Creek was shifted to Burnt Creek, where there had been a rush ... By April 1854 there had been an increase in population at Burnt Creek, and there were 400 diggers there in July. Digging was going on in Quaker’s Gully and two large nuggets were found there in 1854, by October there were 900 on the rush, and the Bet Bet reef was discovered. By November 1854 the gold workings extended three miles from Bet Bet to Burnt Creek and a Commissioners’ Camp was started at Bet Bet, near where Grant’s hotel was later.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallan to Heathcote Rail Trail
    OCTOBER 2017 Wallan to Heathcote Rail Trail Feasibility report – Volume I Mitchell Shire Council 135 Mollison Street, Bendigo, Victoria 3550 (03) 5441 4821 – rmcg.com.au Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 1.1 BACKGROUND 2 1.2 RAIL TRAILS 2 1.3 STRATEGIC MERIT 3 1.4 EXISTING RAIL TRAILS 6 1.5 LESSONS FROM THE O’KEEFE RAIL TRAIL 7 1.6 FEASIBILITY METHODOLOGY 7 1.7 SUPPORTING INFORMATION 7 2 The route alignment 8 2.1 CONTEXT 8 2.2 PRELIMINARY ROUTE 8 2.3 LINKS TO OTHER TRAILS 16 2.4 CONCLUSIONS 19 3 Engineering assessment 20 3.1 INTRODUCTION 20 3.2 ASSUMPTIONS 20 3.3 LAND ACCESS 21 3.4 COST ESTIMATE 21 3.5 ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY 23 4 Economic assessment 24 4.1 INTRODUCTION 24 4.2 USAGE 24 4.3 BENEFITS 24 4.4 COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS 25 5 Landowner and community views 26 5.1 INTRODUCTION 26 5.2 WIDER COMMUNITY FEEDBACK 26 WALLAN TO HEATHCOTE RAIL TRAIL 5.3 LANDHOLDER FEEDBACK 28 5.4 KEY STAKEHOLDER GROUPS 29 5.5 SUMMARY 30 6 Ecological assessment 31 6.1 INTRODUCTION 31 6.2 GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION AND POLICY 31 6.3 NATIVE VEGETATION AND FAUNA HABITAT 31 6.4 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 7 Cultural assessment 34 7.1 DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 34 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 34 8 Conclusion and next steps 36 8.1 CONCLUSION 36 8.2 NEXT STEPS 37 8.3 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 41 WALLAN TO HEATHCOTE RAIL TRAIL Executive Summary This report explores the feasibility of a 78 km rail trail joining the towns of Heathcote Junction (and nearby Wandong and Wallan) north to Kilmore, Pyalong, Tooborac and Heathcote.
    [Show full text]
  • Murrindindi Map (PDF, 3.1
    o! E o! E E E E E E E E E E # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Mt Camel # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Swanpool # # Rushworth TATONG E Forest RA Euroa # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # +$ TATONG - TATO-3 - MT TATONG - REDCASTLE - # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # MITCHELL RD (CFA) TATONG WATCHBOX CHERRY TREE TK # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # CREEK +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # LONGWOOD - # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # REDCASTLE WITHERS ST # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # - PAVEYS RD Lake Nagambie # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # CORNER (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # LONGWOOD Joint Fuel # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Nagambie +$ - WITHERS # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # E STREET (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # E LONGWOOD - MAXFIELD ST +$ SAMARIA PRIVATE PROPERTY (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # - MT JOY +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # +$ +$+$ LONGWOOD - REILLY LA - +$+$ +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # +$ +$ PRIVATE PROPERTY (CFA) # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # REDCASTLE - +$+$ OLD COACH RD LONGWOOD +$ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Management LONGWOOD # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Graytown d - PUDDY R - PRIMARY # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # n LANE (CFA) i # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # a SCHOOL (CFA) M # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # e i # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Ordinary Council Meeting
    ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 17 FEBRUARY 2020 7 ADVOCACY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 7.1 PLACEBASED PLANNING PROJECT - SECOND PHASE ROLLOUT Author: Jo Wilson - Manager Community Strengthening File No: CSC/20/005 Attachments: Nil SUMMARY This report discusses a second phase place-based community planning approach to follow on from the phase one pilot program that commenced in 2019 in Beveridge, Tooborac and Pyalong. Council’s place-based planning approach is founded in the principles of Asset Based Community Development which mobilises the community to come together, to draw on its strengths and to lead initiatives which have the potential to transform community life. The report revisits the rationale for the selection of the three pilot place-based planning approach sites; it proposes five communities for the second-phase rollout – Wandong, Heathcote Junction, Reedy Creek, Tyaak and Clonbinane; and proposes the application of a place-based planning framework to capture and consolidate current and pipeline projects in Wallan ahead of a future immersive community planning process. As with the pilot, the second phase presents an opportunity to deliver place-based outcomes both in small, rural communities and in a growth community setting. RECOMMENDATION THAT Council endorse the second phase place-based approach rollout in the communities of Wandong, Heathcote Junction, Reedy Creek, Tyaak, Clonbinane and Wallan. BACKGROUND In February 2019, Council endorsed the rollout of a place-based community planning approach in three pilot communities – Beveridge, Tooborac and Pyalong. Since that time, community plans have been developed for each of these communities capturing a range of social connection, township improvement and advocacy priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Ymca Superannuation Fund
    21 YEAR EVENT TIME LINE 1989-2010 prepared by Bob Tomkins 21 August 2010 1989 60+ financial members August Val & Jerry McKenna invited public into her home for a slide show and talk given by ACF Save Antarctica campaigner Margaret Moore. 60+ people attended. 18 Aug Because of this large number of people in the Broadford area interested in the natural environment a public meeting, chaired by Bill Coppinger, was held in the Broadford Shire Hall. A Steering Committee of Val McKenna, Colin Officer, Joan Amos, Bill Coppinger, Geoff Vale, John Rauris, Bernadette Cornfoot, Wayne Pappin and Bob Tomkins was nominated to form and run this group. We were temporarily known as the “Broadford Conservation Action Group”, or even the “Broadford Community Action Movement” but we soon settled on “Broadford Environmental Action Movement”, or BEAM. Broadford Native Plants Preservation Committee, an active group formed in 1984 by Colin Officer and Jenny Divers, amalgamated with BEAM. 19 September Public meeting where the 10 member steering committee presented a group structure and operating proposal for consideration and approval. Office bearers were confirmed. 20 September Application #2065 lodged for planning permit by Federation of Gold Mines Nl for mineral exploration and prospecting on area including Mt Piper. October? BEAM lodges objection to recent application for mineral exploration and prospecting on Mt Piper. October BEAM commences and maintains intense public campaign in local press and door knocking residents to oppose mineral exploration and prospecting on Mt Piper. October State and federal parliamentarians and members of opposition join in public outcry against mineral exploration on Mt Piper.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport
    MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL. PUBLIC TRANSPORT. Improving Public Transport in Mitchell Shire Preliminary Business Case May 2018 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 1 Part 1 Problem ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Definition of the Problem......................................................................................... 12 1.3 Evidence of the Problem ......................................................................................... 12 1.4 Timing Considerations ............................................................................................ 20 1.5 Consideration of the Broader Context ..................................................................... 20 2 Part 2 Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Benefits to be Delivered .......................................................................................... 21 2.2 Importance of the Benefits to Government .............................................................. 21 2.3 Evidence of Benefit Delivery ................................................................................... 22 2.4 Interdependencies .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]