Draft Design Report / Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

DRAFT DESIGN REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OCTOBER 2014 Highway / Intersection Project P.I.N. 4531.07 Route 531 Terminus Improvement Monroe County Towns of Ogden and Sweden U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANDREW M. CUOMO, Governor JOAN MCDONALD, Commissioner OCTOBER 2014 Draft Design Report /Environmental Assessment PIN 4531.07 PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET (Pursuant to SAFETEA-LU Matrix) A. IPP Approval: The project is ready to be added to the Regional Capital Program and project scoping can begin. The IPP was approved by: 3/15/04 Kevin Bush, Regional Director B. Scope Approval: The project cost and schedule are consistent with the Regional Capital Program. The scope was approved by: 5/7/10 Kevin Bush, Regional Director C. Public Hearing A public hearing was held on 2014 in accordance with 23 USC 128. Certification (23 USC 128): 2014 Wesley Alden, Project Manager D. Recommendation for The project cost and schedule are consistent with the Regional Capital Program. Design Approval: Regional Program Manager E. Recommendation for All requirements requisite to these actions and approvals have been met, the Design and Nonstandard required independent quality control reviews separate from the functional group Feature Approval: reviews have been accomplished, and the work is consistent with established standards, policies, regulations and procedures, except as otherwise noted and explained. Regional Design Engineer F. Nonstandard Feature The nonstandard features have been adequately justified and it is not prudent to Approval: eliminate them as part of this project. Deputy Chief Engineer G. Design Approval: The required environmental determinations have been made and the preferred alternative for this project is ready for final design. Deputy Chief Engineer i OCTOBER 2014 Draft Design Report /Environmental Assessment PIN 4531.07 LIST OF PREPARERS Group Director Responsible for Production of the Design Approval Document: Frank Billittier, P.E., Regional Design Engineer, NYSDOT – Region 4 P.E. STAMP This report was prepared by the following Prime and subconsultant staff: James Hofmann, P.E., Principal, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.E. STAMP Description of Work Performed by Firm: Directed the preparation of the Design Approval Document in accordance with established standards, policies, regulations and procedures, except as otherwise explained in this document. Bryce A. Walker, P.E., Lead Design Engineer, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.E. STAMP Description of Work Performed by Firm: Prepared the Design Approval Document, developed the engineering solutions and coordinated the multi- disciplined efforts in accordance with established standards, policies, regulations and procedures, except as otherwise explained in this document. John C. Honan, P.E., Senior Manager, Watts Architecture & Engineering, P.C. P.E. STAMP Description of Work Performed by Firm: Directed the preparation of the Environmental Engineering Reports in accordance with established standards, policies, regulations and procedures, except as otherwise explained in this document. Nancy S. Gillette, P.E., Environmental Manager, Ravi Engineering & LS, P.C. P.E. STAMP Description of Work Performed by Firm: Directed the preparation of the Contaminated and Hazardous Materials & Asbestos Assessment in accordance with established standards, policies, regulations and procedures, except as otherwise explained in this document. Note: It is a violation of law for any person, unless they are acting under the direction of a licensed professional engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land surveyor, to alter an item in any way. If an item bearing the stamp of a licensed professional is altered, the altering engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land surveyor shall stamp the document and include the notation "altered by" followed by their signature, the date of such alteration, and a specific description of the alteration. This report was prepared by the following NYSDOT staff: Wes Alden, P.E., Design Project Manager, NYSDOT – Region 4 P.E. STAMP Description of Work Performed: Directly supervised the preparation of the Final Design Report in accordance with established standards, policies, regulations and procedures, except as otherwise explained in this document. ii OCTOBER 2014 Draft Design Report /Environmental Assessment PIN 4531.07 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER (Title / PIN / Location) PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET LIST OF PREPARERS CHAPTER 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ ... 1-3 1.2. Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ ........................ 1-3 1.3. What Alternatives Are Being Considered? ................................................................ ................... 1-4 1.4. How will the Alternatives Affect the Environment? ................................................................ ........ 1-6 1.5. What Are The Costs & Schedules? ................................................................ .............................. 1-8 1.6. Which Alternative is Preferred? ................................................................................................ ... 1-9 1.7. Wh at are the Opportunities for Public Involvment…………………………………………………….. 1-10 CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT CONTEXT: HISTORY, TRANSPORTATION PLANS, CONDITIONS AND NEEDS 2.1. Project History ................................................................................................ .............................. 2-1 2.2. Transportation Plans and Land Use ................................................................ ............................. 2-2 2.2.1. Local Plans for the Project Area......................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2. Transportation Corridor...................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3. Transportation Conditions, Deficiencies and Engineering Considerations ................................ ... 2-3 2.3.1. Operations (Traffic and Safety) & Maintenance................................................................. 2-3 2.3.2. Multimodal.......................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.3.3. Infrastructure...................................................................................................................... 2-14 2.3.4. Potential Enhancement Opportunities................................................................................ 2-18 2.3.5. Miscellaneous..................................................................................................................... 2-19 CHAPTER 3 – ALTERNATIVES 3.1. Alternatives Considered and Eliminated from Further Study ................................ ........................ 3-1 3.2. Feasible Build Alternatives ................................................................................................ ........... 3-3 3.2.1. Description of Feasible Alternatives................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.2 Preferred Alternative........................................................................................................... 3-15 3.2.3. Design Criteria for Feasible Alternative(s).......................................................................... 3-15 3.3. Engineering Considerations................................................................................................ .......... 3-21 3.3.1. Operations (Traffic and Safety) & Maintenance................................................................. 3-21 3.3.2. Multimodal.......................................................................................................................... 3-40 3.3.3. Infrastructure...................................................................................................................... 3-47 3.3.4. Landscape and Environmental Enhancements.................................................................. 3-55 3.3.5. Miscellaneous..................................................................................................................... 3-56 CHAPTER 4 - SOCIAL, ECONOMIC & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ ... 4-1 4.2. Social ................................................................................................................................ ........... 4-3 4.3 Economic ................................................................................................................................ ...... 4-15 4.4 Environmental................................................................................................ ................................ 4-16 4.5 Construction Effects………………..…………………………………………………………………… 4-51 iii OCTOBER 2014 Draft Design Report /Environmental Assessment PIN 4531.07 Appendices A Plans, Profiles & Typical Sections – Feasible Alternatives 2, 3 & 5 Environmental Information B • SHPO Correspondence / Finding Document • Correspondence Traffic Information • Accident Analysis, Safety Screen` C • Design Speed Review • Pedestrian Generator Checklist Public Involvement (PI) Plan and Input from
Recommended publications
  • AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS REPORT for P.I.N. 4531.07 ROUTE 531

    AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS REPORT for P.I.N. 4531.07 ROUTE 531

    AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS REPORT for P.I.N. 4531.07 ROUTE 531 TERMINUS IMPROVEMENTS TOWNS OF SWEDEN and OGDEN MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK MARCH 2013 Prepared For: STANTEC 61 COMMERCIAL STREET ROCHESTER NY 14614 For Submission To: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION FOUR 1530 JEFFERSON ROAD ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 14623 95 Perry Street, Suite 300 Buffalo, New York 14203 p: 716.206.5100 f: 716.206.5199 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope ...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Project Location ........................................................................................ 2 2.2 Project Description .................................................................................... 2 2.3 Existing Air Quality .................................................................................... 3 2.3.1 Regional Priority Pollutants ............................................................. 3 2.3.2 Attainment Classification ................................................................. 6 2.4 Conformity ............................................................................................... 6 3.0 MESOSCALE EMISSION ANALYSIS
  • Improving the Traffic Operations and Safety of Full Cloverleaf Interchanges

    Improving the Traffic Operations and Safety of Full Cloverleaf Interchanges

    fopoj-t No. FHWA-RD-75-J2G m«M THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS NO SAFETY OF FULL CLOVERLEAF INTERCHANGE T.J.Foody and l.Wny -« Of T«* h *4r£ s o» December 1975 final Report cn n,ca Service. ' '"formation Spr/nofielH \/ . -p'ingrieicl, Virginia 22161 Prepared for mUl HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Offices of Research & Development Washington, D.C. 20590 . 13 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 7. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-RD-75-126 - : . !£-&(* 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Improving the Traffic Operations and Safety August 1975 of Full Cloverleaf Interchanges 6. Performing Organization Code " 7. Author(s) ,8. Performing Organization Report No. Foody, Thomas J. and Wray, Jerry H. 9. Performing Orgoni ration Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Ohio Department of Transportation 31J2022 P. 0. Box 899 11. Controcf or Grant No. Columbus, Ohio 43216 DOT-FH-11-8277 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Addres* Department of Transportation Final Report Federal Highway Administration Washington, D. C. 20418 14. Sponsoring Agency Code L - ,.._ &0 3<3-< / 15. Supplementary Notes - — FHWA Contract Manager: Mrs. Julie A. Fee (HRS-41) " ' ~ 16. Abstroct ; criteria for altering existing full imnrn^rlhET^?- cloverleaf interchanges" 9 to ,C 0P ratl S and safet of thi " Particular . * configuratio Only SlSnS^He nar r?«vcloverleafi J ? configuration with a loop ramp and an outer connection in neach quadrant was considered in this study. The data Base from the Interstate C1 nt Ch S Udy U Pr0ject
  • In PDF Format

    In PDF Format

    Attachment 1 Page 1 of 41 TEA-21 HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS - FY 1999 ALLOCATIONS TEA-21 FY 1999 ALLOCATION DEMO ID SECT. 1602 STATE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ. NO. PROJECT STATE TOTALS AL002 957 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 1,500,000 Florence AL002 1498 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 150,000 Florence AL002 1837 Alabama Construct bridge over Tennessee River connecting Muscle Shoals and 150,000 Florence AL006 760 Alabama Construct new I-10 bridge over the Mobile River in Mobile, Alabama. 1,617,187 AL007 423 Alabama Construct the Montgomery Outer Loop from US-80 to I-85 via I-65 1,535,625 AL007 1506 Alabama Construct Montgomery outer loop from US 80 to I-85 via I-65 1,770,000 AL007 1835 Alabama Construct Montgomery Outer Loop from US 80 to I-85 via I-65 150,000 AL008 156 Alabama Construct Eastern Black Warrior River Bridge. 1,950,000 AL008 1500 Alabama Construction of Eastern Black Warrior River Bridge 1,162,500 AL009 777 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass from I-20 to Fort McClellan in 6,021,000 Calhoun County AL009 1505 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass from I-20 to Fort McClellan in 300,000 Calhoun County AL009 1832 Alabama Construct Anniston Eastern Bypass 150,000 AL011 102 Alabama Initiate construction on controlled access highway between the Eastern 450,000 edge of Madison County and Mississippi State line. AL015 189 Alabama Construct Crepe Myrtle Trail near Mobile, Alabama 180,000 AL016 206 Alabama Conduct engineering, acquire right-of-way and construct the 2,550,000 Birmingham Northern Beltline in Jefferson County.
  • Chapter 1 Executive Summary

    Chapter 1 Executive Summary

    DRAFT DESIGN REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Highway Project P.I.N. 4390.13 NYS Route 390/I-490/NYS Route 31 Interchange Improvements Monroe County Town of Gates, Town of Greece and City of Rochester [City/Village] of________ U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANDREW M. CUOMO, Governor JOAN MCDONALD, Commissioner DRAFT DESIGN REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (Appendices Bound Separately) March 2015 Highway Project P.I.N. 4390.13 NYS Route 390/I-490/NYS Route 31 Interchange Improvements Monroe County Town of Gates, Town of Greece and City of Rochester [City/Village] of________ U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANDREW M. CUOMO, Governor JOAN MCDONALD, Commissioner NYS 390 / I-490 / NYS 31 Interchange Improvements March 2015 Draft Design Report / Environmental Assessment PIN 4390.13 PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET (Pursuant to SAFETEA-LU Matrix) A. MIS Approval: The project is ready to be added to the Regional Capital Program and project scoping can begin. The MIS was approved by: 9/9/98 Karl H. Horn Secretary, Genesee Transportation Council B. EPP Approval: The project is recommended for advancement to the preliminary design phase. The EPP was approved by: Regional Director C. Scope Approval: The project cost and schedule are consistent with the Regional Capital Program. The scope was approved by: Regional Director D. Public Hearing A public hearing was held on August 28, 2013 in accordance with 23 USC 128. Certification (23 USC 128): Design Squad Leader or Project Manager E. Recommendation for The project cost and schedule are consistent with the Regional Capital Program.
  • Final Design Report / Environmental Assessment

    Final Design Report / Environmental Assessment

    FINAL DESIGN REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APRIL 2015 Highway / Intersection Project P.I.N. 4531.07 Route 531 Terminus Improvement Monroe County Towns of Ogden and Sweden U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANDREW M. CUOMO, Governor JOAN MCDONALD, Commissioner APRIL 2015 Final Design Report /Environmental Assessment PIN 4531.07 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER (Title / PIN / Location) PROJECT APPROVAL SHEET LIST OF PREPARERS CHAPTER 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 -3 1.2. Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................1 -3 1.3. What Alternatives Are Being Considered? ...................................................................................1 -4 1.4. How will the Alternatives Affect the Environment? ........................................................................1 -6 1.5. What Are The Costs & Schedules? ..............................................................................................1 -8 1.6. Which Alternative is Preferred? ...................................................................................................1 -9 1.7. What are the Opportunities for Public Involvment……………………………………………………..1 - 10 CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT CONTEXT: HISTORY, TRANSPORTATION PLANS, CONDITIONS AND NEEDS 2.1. Project History ..............................................................................................................................2
  • Noise Analysis Report

    Noise Analysis Report

    NOISE ANALYSIS REPORT for P.I.N. 4531.07 ROUTE 531 TERMINUS IMPROVEMENTS TOWNS OF SWEDEN and OGDEN MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK MAY 2013 Prepared For: STANTEC 61 COMMERCIAL STREET ROCHESTER NY 14614 For Submission To: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION FOUR 1530 JEFFERSON ROAD ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 14623 95 Perry Street, Suite 300 Buffalo, New York 14203 p: 716.206.5100 f: 716.206.5199 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................................ 1 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 1 2.0 DESIGN ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................... 3 2.1 NULL/NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................ 3 2.2 BUILD ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................ 3 3.0 NOISE CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................... 4 4.0 METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW .............................................................................. 6 5.0 RECEPTOR SITES ................................................................................................