DOCSLIB.ORG

A Neglected Tragedy: the Global Burden of Stillbirths. Report 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Neglected Tragedy: the Global Burden of Stillbirths. Report 2020 A Neglected Tragedy The global burden of stillbirths Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 UnUnitedited Natatioionsns This report was prepared by Danzhen You, Lucia Hug and Anu Mishra at the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); Hannah Blencowe at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; and Allisyn Moran at the World Health Organization (WHO). It was prepared on behalf of the United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME) and its Core Stillbirth Estimation Group (CSEG). Organizations and individuals involved in stillbirth estimation work UN IGME agencies United Nations Children’s Fund Lucia Hug, Anu Mishra, Sinae Lee, Danzhen You World Health Organization Allisyn Moran, Kathleen Louise Strong, Bochen Cao World Bank Group Emi Suzuki United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division Victor Gaigbe-Togbe Core Stillbirth Estimation Group, UN IGME Technical Advisory Group, UN IGME Leontine Alkema, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Leontine Alkema, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Dianna M. Blau, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (United States) Robert Black, Johns Hopkins University Hannah Blencowe, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Simon Cousens, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Simon Cousens, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Trevor Croft, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program, ICF Andreea Creanga, Johns Hopkins University Michel Guillot, University of Pennsylvania and French Institute for Trevor Croft, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program, ICF Demographic Studies (INED) Kenneth Hill (Chair), Stanton-Hill Research Kenneth Hill (Chair), Stanton-Hill Research K. S. Joseph, University of British Columbia and the Children’s Bruno Masquelier, University of Louvain and Women’s Hospital and Health Centre of British Columbia Colin Mathers, University of Edinburgh Salome Maswime, University of Cape Town Jon Pedersen, Mikro! Elizabeth McClure, RTI International Jon Wakefield, University of Washington Robert Pattinson, University of Pretoria Neff Walker, Johns Hopkins University Jon Pedersen, Mikro! Others Lucy K. Smith, University of Leicester Jennifer Zeitlin, Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), France Zhengfan Wang, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Miranda Fix, University of Washington Special thanks to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for supporting UN IGME’s stillbirth estimation work and to the foundation’s Amy Pollack, Kate Somers and Savitha Subramanian for their inputs. Thanks also to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (United Kingdom) for helping to initiate this work. In addition, many government agencies provided essential data and valuable feedback through the country consultation process. Thanks also to the Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health, the Euro-Peristat network, the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance program and the Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement for providing data, to Karen Avanesyan, Chris Coffey, Jing Liu, Yang Liu, Anne Rerimoi and Zitong Wang for their support in data processing and Guiomar Bay and Helena Cruz Castanheira from the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Population Division for their support. Thanks also go to Emily Carter, Victoria Chou and Neff Walker from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University for providing estimates of indirect impact of COVID-19 pandemic on stillbirths. We would also like to extend special thanks to UNICEF and WHO field office colleagues at UNICEF for supporting the country consultations. Special thanks also to Tedbabe Degefie Hailegebriel, Gagan Gupta and Najaf Zahra for providing valuable inputs to the report and to Vidhya Ganesh, Mark Hereward, Luwei Pearson, Yanhong Zhang, Lisa Adelson, Kurtis Albert Cooper, Karoline Hassfurter, Jacob Hunt, Yves Jaques, Laura Mhairi Anne Kerr, Daniele Olivetti, Sabrina Sidhu, David Sharrow, Anshana Ranck, Brian Sokol, Aleksi Tzatzev and Cecilia Silva Venturini at UNICEF; Anshu Banerjee, Olive Cocoman, Theresa Diaz and Ann-Beth Moller at WHO; Susannah Hopkins Leisher from the International Stillbirth Alliance; and Mary Kinney from Save the Children for their feedback and support. Naomi Lindt edited the report. Sinae Lee laid out the report. Yasmine Hage and Baishalee Nayak fact checked the report. Photo credits Cover page: © UNICEF/UN0283747/Tanhoa Copyright © 2020 by the United Nations Children’s Fund ISBN: 978-92-806-5141-6 The United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME) constitutes representatives of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. UN IGME stillbirth estimates were reviewed by countries through a country consultation process but are not necessarily the official statistics of United Nations Member States, which may use a single data source or alternative rigorous methods. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNICEF, WHO, the World Bank Group or the United Nations Population Division concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. United Nations Children’s Fund World Bank Group 3 UN Plaza, New York, New York, 10017 USA 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20433 USA World Health Organization United Nations Population Division Avenue Appia 20, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland 2 UN Plaza, New York, New York, 10017 USA A Neglected Tragedy The global burden of stillbirths Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 A GLOBAL HEALTH PROBLEM 9 ENORMOUS BURDEN AND LOSS 20 SLOW PROGRESS IN PREVENTING STILLBIRTHS 31 THE FUTURE WE WANT THE WAY FORWARD: ESSENTIAL ACTIONS 41 AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 ANNEX A woman experiencing labour pain from West Bengal, India, waits for the doctor. © UNICEF/UNI194346/Kaur A GLOBAL HEALTH PROBLEM 3 A Global Health Problem One stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds. This means to 0.38. In sub-Saharan Africa, the number of that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn. stillbirths is rising: They increased from 0.77 million This loss reaches far beyond the loss of life. The in 2000 to 0.82 million in 2019, as the growth in total psychological costs, such as maternal depression, are births outpaced the decline in the region’s stillbirth profound, not to mention the financial consequences rate. And in some high-income countries – despite for parents and long-term economic repercussions very low levels of neonatal mortality – more stillbirths for society.1 Though the difficult impacts on families than neonatal deaths occur, and in some cases, even – and most especially on women – are severe and surpass the number of infant deaths. long lasting, stigma and taboo hide the hardship of stillbirths, even in high-income countries.2 Slow progress in preventing stillbirths means the losses have been enormous. In the past two But this traumatic loss of life remains a neglected decades, the world suffered a total of 48 million issue. Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data stillbirths. If current trends continue, an additional 20 tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem million stillbirths will take place before 2030, placing hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes immense and unjust strain on women, families and and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. society. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)3 and are Preventable losses still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.4 Why are we losing so many babies before they take their first breath? Why is progress in reducing the A growing public health issue stillbirth rate so slow? There are a variety of reasons: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy Over the past two decades, progress in lowering the and birth; lack of investment in preventative stillbirth rate has not kept pace with achievements interventions and the health workforce; inadequate in saving mothers’ lives or those of newborns in the social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; first 28 days of life. In the first two decades of this measurement challenges and major data gaps; century, the annual rate of reduction in the stillbirth absence of global and national leadership; and no rate was just 2.3 per cent, compared to a 2.9 per established global targets, such as the Sustainable cent reduction in neonatal mortality and 4.3 per cent Development Goals (SDGs). among children aged 1–59 months.5 Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality What makes these deaths even more tragic is that decreased by 2.9 per cent.6 the majority could have been prevented with high- quality monitoring and care antenatally7 and at birth.8, Available data demonstrate that stillbirths are an 9, 10 Over 40 per cent of all stillbirths occur during increasingly critical global health problem. In 2000, labour – a loss that could be avoided with improved the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of monitoring and timely access to emergency obstetric under-five deaths was
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maternal and Foetal Mortality in Placenta Praevia"
    J Obs Gyn Brit Emp 1962 V-69 MATERNAL AND FOETAL MORTALITY IN PLACENTA PRAEVIA" BY C. H. G. MACAFEE,C.B.E., D.Sc., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.O.G. Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Queen's Universiiy of Belfast W. GORDONMILLAR, F.R.F.P.S., F.R.C.S., M.R.C.O.G. Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Royal Injirmary, Perth; formerly Lecturer in Department qf Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Queen's University of Belfast AND GRAHAMHARLEY, M.D., M.R.C.O.G. Lecturer, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Queen's University of Belfast IN the 95 years between 1844-1939 the foetal During the first eight-year period 206 patients mortality from placenta praevia remained at were dealt with and in the second period the between 54 per cent and 60 per cent, while the number was 219. These two figures correspond maternal mortality fell from 30 per cent to 5 so closely that they permit a good statistical per cent. comparison to be made between the two eight- year periods. TABLE I Maternal Foetal Expectant Treatment Author Date Mortality Mortality In recent years the value of this treatment has been recognized and is becoming more 01,'O % SimDson . .. 1844 30 60 widely accepted even though it entails the Berkeley . 1936 7 59 occupation of antenatal beds sometimes for Browne . 1939 5 54 weeks. It is obvious that the nearer the preg- Belfast series . 1945-52 nil 14.9 nancy can be carried to full term the more 1953-60 0.9 11.1 favourable the outlook for the baby.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesarean Section for Placenta Praevia (Consent Advice No
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Consent Advice No. 12 December 2010 CAESAREAN SECTION FOR PLACENTA PRAEVIA This is the first edition of this guidance. This paper provides additional advice for clinicians in obtaining consent of a woman to undergo caesarean section in the specific circumstance of current pregnancy with placenta praevia with or without previous caesarean section. It is designed to be used in conjunction with Consent Advice No. 7: Caesarean section.1 The aim of this paper is to highlight the additional and specific consequences of caesarean section performed in the presence of placenta praevia. The information should, where possible, be provided during the antenatal period in the form of an information sheet to allow the woman to understand the situation and to provide ample opportunities for her to ask any questions she may have and to antenatally meet providers of additional services that may become necessary, such as interventional radiologists. Depending on local clinical governance arrangements, an additional consent form may be used with the addition- al risks highlighted, or the additional risks may be incorporated in a specific consent form for the whole procedure. CONSENT FORM 1. Name of proposed procedure or course of treatment Caesarean section for placenta praevia. 2. The proposed procedure Describe the nature of caesarean section and emphasise how a procedure in the presence of placenta praevia varies in comparison with one performed in the presence of a normally sited placenta. Explain the procedure as described in the patient information. 3. Intended benefits The aim of the procedure is to secure the safest route of delivery to avoid the anticipated risks to the mother and/or baby of the heavy bleeding that would occur during labour and attempted vaginal delivery owing to the position of the placenta.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Subsequent Pregnancy After an Unexplained Stillbirth
    Journal of Perinatology (2010) 30, 305–310 r 2010 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved. 0743-8346/10 $32 www.nature.com/jp STATE-OF-THE-ART Management of subsequent pregnancy after an unexplained stillbirth SJ Robson1 and LR Leader2 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia and 2School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, Australia they face in a subsequent pregnancy, as well as potential Purpose: To review the management of pregnancy after an unexplained management strategies to optimize future pregnancy outcomes.2–4 stillbirth. Unfortunately, as many as one-third of such cases remain Epidemiology: Approximately 1 in 200 pregnancies will end in ‘unexplained’ and unexplained stillbirth is now the commonest stillbirth, of which about one-third will remain unexplained. Unexplained single contributor to perinatal mortality. stillbirth is the largest single contributor to perinatal mortality. There is no evidence that extensive research efforts over the last Subsequent pregnancies do not appear to have an increased risk of two decades have yielded a reduction in the incidence of this 2,5 stillbirth, but are characterized by increased rates of intervention distressing outcome. Virtually all of the published literature is (induction of labor, elective cesarean section) and iatrogenic adverse concerned with population-based strategies for primary prevention outcomes (low birth weight, prematurity, emergency cesarean section and of unexplained stillbirth. However, the commonest situation in post-partum hemorrhage). which clinicians will find themselves is management of women in their next pregnancy after an unexpected unexplained stillbirth. Conclusions: There is no level-one evidence to guide management in Effective care of women in their next pregnancy after an this situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Preterm Delivery and Risk of Breast Cancer
    British Journal of Cancer (1999) 80(3/4), 609–613 © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Article no. bjoc.1998.0399 Preterm delivery and risk of breast cancer M Melbye, J Wohlfahrt, A-MN Andersen, T Westergaard and PK Andersen Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Summary To explore the risk of breast cancer in relation to the length of a pregnancy we tested whether a preterm delivery carries a higher risk of breast cancer than does a full-term delivery. Based on information from the Civil Registration System, and the National Birth Registry in Denmark, we established a population-based cohort of 474 156 women born since April 1935, with vital status and detailed parity information, including the gestational age of liveborn children and stillbirths. Information on spontaneous and induced abortions was obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Registry and the National Registry of Induced Abortions. Incident cases of breast cancer in the cohort (n = 1363) were identified through linkage with the Danish Cancer Registry. The period at risk started in 1978 and continued until a breast cancer diagnosis, death, emigration, or 31 December, 1992, whichever occurred first. After adjusting for attained age, parity, age at first birth and calendar period, we observed the following relative risks of breast cancer for different lengths of the pregnancy: < 29 gestational weeks = 2.11 (95% confidence interval 1.00–4.45); 29–31 weeks = 2.08 (1.20–3.60); 32–33 weeks = 1.12 (0.62–2.04); 34–35 weeks = 1.08 (0.71–1.66); 36–37 weeks = 1.04 (0.83–1.32); 38–39 weeks = 1.02 (0.89–1.17); 40 weeks = 1 (reference).
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Abuse in Pregnant Women: Effects on the Fetus and Newborn, Mode of Action and Maternal Treatment
    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 364-379; doi:10.3390/ijerph7020364 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Review Alcohol Abuse in Pregnant Women: Effects on the Fetus and Newborn, Mode of Action and Maternal Treatment Asher Ornoy 1,* and Zivanit Ergaz 1,2 1 Laboratory of Teratology, The Institute of Medical Research Israel Canada, Hadassah Medical School and Hospital, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Ein Kerem, P.O. Box 12271, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Neonatology, Hadassah Medical School and Hospital, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, P.O. Box 24035, Jerusalem, 91240, Israel * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +972-50-624-2125. Received: 16 December 2009 / Accepted: 22 January 2010 / Published: 27 January 2010 Abstract: Offspring of mothers using ethanol during pregnancy are known to suffer from developmental delays and/or a variety of behavioral changes. Ethanol, may affect the developing fetus in a dose dependent manner. With very high repetitive doses there is a 6–10% chance of the fetus developing the fetal alcoholic syndrome manifested by prenatal and postnatal growth deficiency, specific craniofacial dysmorphic features, mental retardation, behavioral changes and a variety of major anomalies. With lower repetitive doses there is a risk of "alcoholic effects" mainly manifested by slight intellectual impairment, growth disturbances and behavioral changes. Binge drinking may impose some danger of slight intellectual deficiency. It is advised to offer maternal abstinence programs prior to pregnancy, but they may also be initiated during pregnancy with accompanying close medical care.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Factors and Outcomes of Placenta Praevia in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo
    Open Access Austin Journal of Pregnancy & Child Birth Research Article Risk Factors and Outcomes of Placenta Praevia in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo Ndomba MM1, Mukuku O2*, Tamubango HK2, Biayi JM1, Kinenkinda X1, Kakudji PL1 and Abstract 1 Kakoma JB Introduction: Placenta Praevia (PP) is frequently associated with severe 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of maternal bleeding leading to an increased risk for adverse outcome of mother Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo and infant. This study aims to determine the prevalence, and to evaluate potential 2Higher Institute of Medical Techniques, Democratic risk factors and respective outcomes of pregnancies with PP in Lubumbashi, Republic of Congo Democratic Republic of Congo. *Corresponding author: Olivier Mukuku, Higher Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients diagnosed Institute of Medical Techniques, Lubumbashi, with PP at 4 hospitals in Lubumbashi between January 2013 and December Democratic Republic of Congo 2016. All women who gave birth to singleton infants were studied. Differences Received: January 11, 2021; Accepted: February 02, between women with PP and without PP were evaluated. Adjusted Odds Ratios 2021; Published: February 09, 2021 (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals for risk factors, and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with PP were estimated in multivariable logistic regression. Results: The overall prevalence of PP was 1.49% (227/15,292). The following risk factors were independently associated with PP: multiparity ≥6 (aOR=2.36; 95% CI: 1.13-4.91), previous cesarean section (aOR=6.74; 95% CI: 2.99-15.18), and no antenatal care visit during pregnancy (aOR=7.15; 95% CI: 4.86-10.53).
    [Show full text]
  • What Steps Should You Take to Improve Your Voice? Singing Sensation Claire Richards Tells All… Submitted By: Bray Leino Wednesday, 13 January 2010
    What steps should you take to improve your voice? Singing sensation Claire Richards tells all… Submitted by: Bray Leino Wednesday, 13 January 2010 From warbling classics in the shower to booming out the latest track whilst at the wheel on the M4, never before have so many Brits had aspirations to become singers. With The X-Factor inspiring a whopping 12 million people to audition – twice the number of people living in London - and home karaoke games such as Sing Star and Rock Band selling out at Christmas, it seems everyone wants to get in on the act. But how should all our aspiring singers take the best care of their voices and give themselves the best possible shot at fame – whether on stage or in your living room? Jakemans (http://www.jakemans.com), the soothing menthol cough sweet popular with professional singers, has teamed up with Steps star Claire Richards to provide some tips on how to enhance the singing voices that Mother Nature gave us. With a string of hit singles including ‘5,6,7,8’, ‘Tragedy’ and ‘Last Thing On My Mind’, Claire was a key member of the pop quintet and is keen to continue her singing career after her second child is born later this year. Her top tips for aspiring performers everywhere include: 1.Wherever possible, avoid alcohol, especially before singing 2.Swap your usual cuppa for a herbal tea or hot honey and lemon 3.Make sure you warm up your voice properly 4.Steam your throat regularly by breathing in hot water vapours 5.Sip warm or tepid water rather than cold 6.Suck Jakemans before performing, the menthol vapors lubricate the vocal cords 7.Don’t gargle if you have a sore throat – it’s a myth 8.If you have a cold, try and clear your throat gently rather than big strong coughs 9.Avoid throat sprays that numb the throat, they’ll give you a false sense of security and damage your vocal cords more 10.Finally, try and rest your voice whenever you can, particularly before singing.
    [Show full text]
  • Postdates Pregnancy MANAGEMENT of the UNCOMPLICATED POSTDATES PREGNANCY Approved – January 2007, April 2011 for Review – April 2013
    Department of Midwifery Postdates Pregnancy MANAGEMENT OF THE UNCOMPLICATED POSTDATES PREGNANCY Approved – January 2007, April 2011 For Review – April 2013 Acknowledgements PRINCIPAL AUTHORS Yarra Vostrcil, RM Chloe Dayman, RM CONTRIBUTORS Department of Midwifery Guidelines Committee Andrea Mattenley (Chair), RM Carole Miceli, RM Cora Beitel, RM Corina Pautler, RM Amelia Doran, RM Katie McNiven‐Gladman, RM Jennifer Duggan, RM Thea Parkin, RM Leslie Gunning, RM Mandy Reid, RM Kelly Hayes, RM Laura Willihnganz, RM Carolyn Hunt, RM Preamble Guidelines outline recommendations, informed by both the best available evidence and by midwifery philosophy, to guide midwives in specific practice situations and to support their process of informed decision‐making with clients. The midwifery philosophy recognizes the client as the primary decision maker in all aspects of her care and respects the autonomy of the client (1). The best evidence is helpful in assisting thoughtful management decisions and may be balanced by experiential knowledge and clinical judgment. It is not intended to demand unquestioning adherence to its doctrine as even the best evidence may be vulnerable to critique and interpretation. The purpose of practice guidelines is to enhance clinical assessment and decision‐making in a way that supports practitioners to offer a high standard of care. This is supported within a model of well‐informed, shared decision‐ making with clients in order to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. Background The College of Midwives of British Columbia supports registered midwives in providing primary care for women with post‐dates pregnancies. This guideline is intended to assist midwives in offering choices to these women. Definitions The following are World Health Organization (WHO) definitions (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Mortality Perinatal Subset, 2013
    ICD-10 Mortality Perinatal Subset (2013) Subset of alphabetical index to diseases and nature of injury for use with perinatal conditions (P00-P96) Conditions arising in the perinatal period Note - Conditions arising in the perinatal period, even though death or morbidity occurs later, should, as far as possible, be coded to chapter XVI, which takes precedence over chapters containing codes for diseases by their anatomical site. These exclude: Congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalities (Q00-Q99) Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases (E00-E99) Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes (S00-T99) Neoplasms (C00-D48) Tetanus neonatorum (A33 2a) A -ablatio, ablation - - placentae (see alsoAbruptio placentae) - - - affecting fetus or newborn P02.1 2a -abnormal, abnormality, abnormalities - see also Anomaly - - alphafetoprotein - - - maternal, affecting fetus or newborn P00.8 - - amnion, amniotic fluid - - - affecting fetus or newborn P02.9 - - anticoagulation - - - newborn (transient) P61.6 - - cervix NEC, maternal (acquired) (congenital), in pregnancy or childbirth - - - causing obstructed labor - - - - affecting fetus or newborn P03.1 - - chorion - - - affecting fetus or newborn P02.9 - - coagulation - - - newborn, transient P61.6 - - fetus, fetal 1 ICD-10 Mortality Perinatal Subset (2013) - - - causing disproportion - - - - affecting fetus or newborn P03.1 - - forces of labor - - - affecting fetus or newborn P03.6 - - labor NEC - - - affecting fetus or newborn P03.6 - - membranes
    [Show full text]
  • Song Title Version 1 More Time Daft Punk 5,6,7,8 Steps All 4 L0ve Color Me Badd All F0r Y0u Janet Jackson All That I Need Boyzon
    SONG TITLE VERSION 1 MORE TIME DAFT PUNK 5,6,7,8 STEPS ALL 4 L0VE COLOR ME BADD ALL F0R Y0U JANET JACKSON ALL THAT I NEED BOYZONE ALL THAT SHE WANTS ACE OF BASE ALWAYS ERASURE ANOTHER NIGHT REAL MCCOY BABY CAN I HOLD YOU BOYZONE BABY G0T BACK SIR MIX-A-LOT BAILAMOS ENRIQUE IGLESIAS BARBIE GIRL AQUA BLACK CAT JANET JACKSON BOOM, BOOM, BOOM, BOOM!! VENGABOYS BOP BOP BABY WESTUFE BRINGIT ALL BACK S CLUB 7 BUMBLE BEE AQUA CAN WE TALK CODE RED CAN'T BE WITH YOU TONIGHT IRENE CANT GET YOU OUT OF MY HEAD KYLIE MINOGUE CAN'T HELP FALLING IN LOVE UB40 CARTOON HEROES AQUA C'ESTLAVIE B*WITCHED CHIQUITITA ABBA CLOSE TO HEAVEN COLOR ME BADD CONTROL JANET JACKSON CRAZY FOR YOU MADONNA CREEP RADIOHEAD CRY FOR HELP RICK ASHLEY DANCING QUEEN ABBA DONT CALL ME BABY MADISON AVENUE DONT DISTURB THIS GROOVE THE SYSTEM DONT FOR GETTO REMEMBER BEE GEES DONT LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD SANTA ESMERALDA DONT SAY YOU LOVE ME M2M DONT TURN AROUND ACE OF BASE DONT WANNA LET YOU GO FIVE DYING INSIDE TO HOLDYOU TIMMY THOMAS EL DORADO GOOMBAY DANCE BAND ELECTRIC DREAMS GIORGIO MORODES EVERYDAY I LOVE YOU BOYZONE EVERYTHING M2M EVERYTHING COUNTS DEPECHE MODE FAITHFUL GO WEST FATHER AND SON BOYZONE FILL ME IN CRAIG DAVID FIRST OF MAY BEE GEES FLYING WITHOUT WINGS WESTLIFE FOOL AGAIN WESTLIFE FOR EVER AS ONE VENGABOYS FUNKY TOWN UPS INC GET DOWN TONIGHT KC & THE SUNSHINE BAND GET THE PARTY STARTED PINK GET UP (BEFORE THE NIGHT IS OVER) TECHNOTRONIC GIMME GIMME GIMME ABBA HAPPY SONG BONEY M.
    [Show full text]
  • Propylthiouracil Tablets, Usp
    PROPYLTHIOURACIL TABLETS, USP WARNING Severe liver injury and acute liver failure, in some cases fatal, have been reported in patients treated with propylthiouracil. These reports of hepatic reactions include cases requiring liver transplantation in adult and pediatric patients. Propylthiouracil should be reserved for patients who cannot tolerate methimazole and in whom radioactive iodine therapy or surgery are not appropriate treatments for the management of hyperthyroidism. Propylthiouracil may be the treatment of choice when an antithyroid drug is indicated during or just prior to the first trimester of pregnancy (see Warnings and Precautions). DESCRIPTION Propylthiouracil is one of the thiocarbamide compounds. It is a white, crystalline substance that has a bitter taste and is very slightly soluble in water. Propylthiouracil is an antithyroid drug administered orally. The structural formula is: Each tablet contains propylthiouracil 50 mg and the following inactive ingredients: corn starch, docusate sodium, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, pregelatinized starch, sodium benzoate, and sodium starch glycolate. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Propylthiouracil inhibits the synthesis of thyroid hormones and thus is effective in the treatment of hyperthyroidism. The drug does not inactivate existing thyroxine and triiodothyronine that are stored in the thyroid or circulating in the blood, nor does it interfere with the effectiveness of thyroid hormones given by mouth or by injection. Propylthiouracil inhibits the conversion of thyroxine
    [Show full text]
  • Stillbirth: a Healthcare Professional's Role
    Stillbirth: A Healthcare Professional’s Role The loss of a baby due to stillbirth remains a sad reality for many families and takes a serious toll on the families’ health and well-being. Here’s how you can help. How You Can Provide Support Helping parents understand as much as possible about what happened to their baby can be an essential part of the grieving process. Talking with the family about the importance of a thorough evaluation of the stillborn child can often provide Overview valuable answers that help in the healing process. What is stillbirth? Every family deserves the A stillbirth (or fetal death) is the death of opportunity to discuss the a baby in utero before or during delivery. specifics of their loss so as In the United States, a miscarriage to help them decide which, usually refers to a fetal loss less than 20 if any, tests they would weeks after a woman becomes pregnant, like done. and a stillbirth refers to a loss 20 or more weeks after a woman becomes pregnant. Communication Be sensitive: Family members are often devastated and bewildered How common is stillbirth? following such a tragic and unexpected loss. Healthcare providers Each year in the United States should be sensitive to these feelings while still explaining the approximately 24,000 babies are importance of an evaluation. This will allow the family to make an stillborn. Stillbirths occur almost 10 informed decision. times more often than Sudden Infant Explain possible next steps: Explaining the evaluation process as part Death Syndrome (SIDS). There is also a of grief counseling service has proven useful in many institutions.
    [Show full text]