DOCSLIB.ORG

Subfamilies and Genera of the Soricidae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subfamilies and Genera of the Soricidae Subfamilies and Genera of the Soricidae GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 565 Subfamilies and Genera of the Soricidae By CHARLES A. REPENNING GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 565 Classification, historical zoogeography, and temporal correlation of the shrews UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 67-175 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 50 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Diagnoses and contents of subfamilies Continued Page Abstract.___-_--------__-_____________________-____ 1 Subfamily Soricinae Fischer von Waldheim, 1817.____ 27 Introduction.______________________________________ 1 Tribe Soricini Fischer von Waldheim, 1817._______ 29 Evaluation of characters...-_________________________ 3 Genus Crocidosorex Lavocat, 1951______________ 29 Diagnoses and contents of subfamilies.____________ ____ 7 Crocidosorex piveteaui Lavocat.___________ 29 Subfamily Heterosoricinae Viret and Zapfe, 1951.____ 7 Crocidosorex antiquus (Pomel)____________ 29 Genus Domnina Cope, 1873____________________ 7 Genus Antesorex Repenning, n. gen______________ 30 Domnina thompsoni Simpson._-_-_--_.___ 8 Antesorex compressus (Wilson)_____---_-_- 31 Domnina gradata Cope._____--.---.._.._ 8 Genus Sorex Linnaeus, 1758.___________________ 31 Domnina greeni Macdonald______________ 9 Genus Drepanosorex Kretzoi, 1941 ___-____-____- 32 Domnina n. sp________________________ 9 Genus Microsorex Baird, 1877_-___-_-_-_-_---_- 33 Genus Paradomnina Hutchison, 1966____________ 10 Genus Alluvisorex Hutchison, 1966___-___-___-_- 33 Genus Trimylus Roger, 1885.__________________ 10 Genus Petenyia Kormos, 1934__________________ 34 Trimylus compressus (Galbreath)_________ 11 Genus Blarinella Thomas, 1911____--__--__----- 34 Trimylus aff. neumayrianus (Schlosser)__ 11 Blarinella kormosi (Schlosser)____________ 35 Trimylus neumayrianus (Schlosser)______ 12 Blarinella quadraticauda (Milne-Edwards). 35 Trimylus dakotensis Repenning, n. sp_.__ 12 Soricini incertae sedis_______________-_---------- 35 Trimylus roperi Wilson._________________ 13 "Sorex" stehlini Doben-Florin.________--------- 35 Trimylus mawbyi Repenning, n. sp________ 13 "Sorex" hibbardi SulimskL_________-_____--_-_- 36 Trimylus sansaniensis (Lartet)___________ 14 Genus Zelceina Sulimski, l962_-_-_------------- 36 Genus Ingentisorex Hutchison, 1966.____________ 15 Tribe Blarinini Stirton, 1930___________________ 37 Subfamily Crocidurinae Milne-Edwards, 1868-1874. _ _ 15 Genus Adeloblarina Repenning, n. gen__ _________ 37 "Sorex" pusilliformis Doben-Florin____________ 15 Adeloblarina berklandi Repenning, n. sp 37 "Sorex" dehmiVirei and Zapfe________________ 15 Genus Cryptotis Pomel, 1848_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - 39 Genus Crocidura Wagler, 1832..________________ 16 Cryptotis adamsi (Hibbard)______________ 39 Crocidura sp., Butler and Hopwood_______ 17 Cryptotis"? meadensis Hibbard- .__-_____ 40 Corcidura wongi Pei.____________________ 17 Cryptotis kansasensis Hibbard-___________ 40 Crocidura taungsensis Broom.____________ 17 Cryptotis parva (Say)___-_-_-_-__--_----- 41 Crocidura kornfeldi Kormos__-___-_-__-_ 17 Cryptotis mexicana (Coues). __________ 41 Crocidura obtusa Kretzoi________________' 17 Genus Paracryptotis Hibbard, 1950 ___________ 41 Crocidura zorzii Pasa__________________ 17 Genus Shikamainosorex Hasegawa, 1957_________ 42 Genus Diplomesodon Brandt, 1853_-__------_-_- 17 "Sorex" dehrieli KowalskL_________----_---_--- 42 Diplomesodon fossorius Repenning._______ 18 Genus Blarina Gray, 1838__._..__--------- - 42 Genus Feroculus Kelaart, 1852________________ 18 Blarina gidleyi Gazin ______-_-_------- 43 Genus Miosorex Kretzoi, 1959._________________ 18 Genus Blarinoides Sulimski, 1959.___-_--__---_- 44 Miosorex grivensis (Depe"ret)_____________ 19 Blarinini? incertae sedis.___________------------- 44 Genus Myosorex Gray, 1838.___________________ 19 "Sorex" kretzoii Sulimski______________-_--_-- 44 Myosorex robinsoni Meester._____________ 20 Peisorex pohaiensis Kowalski and Li __________ 45 Genus Paracrocidura Balsac, 1956_____________ 20 Tribe Neomyini Repenning, new name.____-_----- 45 Genus Praesorex Thomas, 1913_-_-_-__-___-_-__ 20 Genus Neomys Kaup, 1829___--------_--------- 46 Genus Scuti orex Thomas, 1913_ ________________ 21 Genus Petenyiella Kretzoi, 1956_____-_---------- 46 Genus Solisorex Thomas, 1924__________________ 21 Genus Episoriculus Eilerman and Morrison-Scott, Genus Soricella Doben-Florin, 1964.____________ 21 1951.___--__.___-------------------- 47 Genus Suncus Ehrenberg, 1832__-_---____-_____ 21 Episoriculus gibberodon (Petenyi) ___-__--- 48 Suncus sp., Meester_____________________ 22 Genus Chodsigoa Kastschenko, 1907__________-_- 48 Genus Surdisorex Thomas, 1906._______________ 22 Chodsigoa bohlini (Young)_________-___-- 50 Genus Sylvisorex Thomas, 1905_________________ 22 Genus Beremendia Kormos, 1934_____----------- 50 Crocidurinae? incertae sedis________________________ 23 Genus Nesiotites Bate, 1945.______-----_------- 51 "Limnoecus" micromorphus Doben-Florin._______ 23 Genus Nectogale Milne-Edwards, l870__-_----__- 51 "Sorex" collongensis Mein______________________ 24 Genus Soriculus Elyth, 1854._______ ____--_- 52 Genus Chimarrogale Anderson, 1877__---_-_----- 53 Crocidura?, Mein.____________________________ 24 Genus Anourosorex Milne-Edwards, 1870. _______ 53 Subfamily Limnoecinae Repenning, new name___. ____ 24 Genus Amblycoptus Kormos, 1926____----------- 54 Genus Angustidens Repenning, n. gen___________ 25 Genus Hesperosorex Hibbard, 1957__-_---------- 55 Angustidens vireti (Wilson)_______________ 25 Genus Notiosorex Baird, 1877_---------------- 55 Genus Limnoecus Stirton, 1930.________________ 26 Genus Megasorex Hibbard, 1950.________---_--- 56 Limnoecus tricuspis Stirton_____________ 26 Neomyini? incertae sedis___________-__--------- 57 Limnoecus niobrarensis Macdonald-_ ______ 27 Deinsdorfia franconia Heller._______----_------- 57 m IV CONTENTS Diagnoses and contents of subfamilies Continued Page Diagnoses and contents of subfamilies Continued Page Subfamily Allosoricinae Fejfar, 1966.__________ 57 Names of fossil genera not used in text_________ 58 "Sorex" gracilidens Viret and Zapfe._______ 57 Ancestry of the Soricidae_______________________ 58 Paleozoogeography and correlation______________ 59 Genus Allosorex Fejfar, 1966._____________ 57 Key to living and fossil genera of the Soricidae____ 63 Soricidae incertae sedis_______________________ 57 References.___________________________________ 66 Podihik kura Deraniyagala._______________ 57 Index_ _______________________________________ 71 ILLUSTRATIONS [Figs. 1-41 are drawings of the Soricidae] Page Page FIGURE 1. Taxonomically significant differences. 22. Alluvisorex chasseae- _____________________ 33 2. Domnina thompsoni. 23. Petenyia hungarica-.--------------------- 34 3. Domnina gradata. ______ 9 24. Blarinella quadraticauda __________________ 35 4. Domnina n. sp_________ 10 25. Adeloblarina berklandi-.------------------ 38 5. Trimylus compressus. 11 26. Cryptotis adamsi,.---------- ------------- 39 6. Trimylus dakotensis _____ 12 27. Cryptotis parva------------------------ _ 1 40 7. Trimylus mawbyi _______ 14 28. Paracryptotis rex...---------------------- 41 8. Crocidura russu'a. ______ 16 29. Blarina brevicauda- ______________________ 43 9. Diplomesodon pulchellum- 17 30. Blarina gidleyi-------------------------- 43 10. Miosorex grivensis______ 18 31. Neomys jodiens-------------------------- 46 11. Myosorex varius. _______ 19 32. Episoriculus caudatus_____________________ 47 12. Praesorex goliath. _______ 20 33. Chodsigoa hypsibia,---------------------- 49 13. Suncus caeruleus.. ______ 22 34. Chodsigoa salenskii - ____________________ 49 14. Surdisorex norae. _______ 23 35. Beremendia fissidens______________________ 50 15. Sylvisorex lunaris. ______ 23 36. Nectogale elegans ----------------------- 51 16. Angustidens vireti. ______ 25 37. Soriculus nigrescens. _____________________ 52 17. Limnoecus tricuspis. 26 38. Chimarrogale himalayica,------------------ 53 18. Limnoecus niobrarensis_ _ 27 39. Anourosorex squamipes. __________________ 54 19. Antesorex compressus.... 30 40. Notiosorex crawfordi.--------------------- 56 20. Sorex araneus. _________ 31 41. Megasorex gigas__________________________ 56 21. Microsorex hoyi- ________ 32 42. Diagram of a phylogeny of the Soricidae ___ 61 SUBFAMILIES AND GENERA OF THE SORICIDAE By CHARLES A. KEPENNING ABSTRACT largely on the basis of masticatory modifications; this basis of The shrews constitute a distinct and uniform but phylo- separation is supplemented by characters in the teeth. The genetically diverse family in which five subfamilies, one sub­ tribe Soricini contains at least 3 extinct genera, about 30 ex­ divided into three tribes, can be recognized by consistent mor­ tinct species, and 4 living genera. It is characterized by lit­ phologic differences. These differences are traceable back tle modification of its mandibular articulation or teeth and by a prominent entoconid crest on lf±. The tribe Blarinini con­ through the late and middle Tertiary shrews and point to a hypothetical common ancestor. The trends of the morphologic tains at least 4 extinct genera, 10 extinct species, and 2 living change within the subfamilies rather clearly indicate what this genera. It is characterized by slight to great modification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Small Mammal Populations in Riparian Zones of Different-Aged Coniferous Forests
    SMALL MAMMAL POPULATIONS IN RIPARIAN ZONES OF DIFFERENT-AGED CONIFEROUS FORESTS R. G. ANTHONY, E. D. FORSMAN, G. A. GREEN, G. WITMER, AND S. K. NELSON ABSTRACT— Small mammals were trapped in riparian zones in young, mature, and old-growth coniferous forests during spring and summer of 1983. Peromyscus manicu- latus was the most abundant species and comprised 76% and 83% of the total captures during spring and summer, respectively. More species, but fewer individuals, were captured on the streamside transects in comparison to the riparian fringe transects, which were 15-20 m from the stream. Six species of Insectivora, including five species of Sorex, were captured in these riparian zones. No species was solely dependent on riparian zones in old-growth forests; however, additional studies are needed to define the specific habitat requirements of Sorex bendirii, Sorex palustris, Neurotrichus gibbsii, Phenacomys albipes, and Microtus richardsoni. Riparian zones recently have been recognized for their uniqueness and intrinsic value as wildlife habitat. To date, much attention has been focused on the most conspicuous riparian zones, such as those found in semiarid lands or along major rivers and streams (Johnson and Jones 1977, Thomas et al. 1979). Studies on wildlife populations in riparian zones dominated by coniferous forests are less numerous (Swanson et al. 1982), although riparian zones along low-order (second-, third-, and fourth-order streams at the head of watersheds) mountain streams are an integral part of the forest ecosystem (Swanson et al. 1982). Harvest of old-growth forests has become a major forestry-wildlife issue, because these forests provide unique wildlife habitat and they are rapidly being logged (Meslow et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrews Are Known As Insectivores, All Shrews Eat Insects & Arachnids
    C O M M O N , P Y G M Y & S H R E W S W A T E R Sorex araneus, Sorex minutus, Neomys fodiens Ecology I N T R O D U C T I O N D I E T Shrews are known as insectivores, All shrews eat insects & arachnids. The eating a wide range of critters which common shrew will also eat slugs, they hunt out with their highly snails and earthworms where as the developed sense of smell, sound and Water shrew loves a caddis fly nymph touch. & freshwater shrimp. They are highly territorial, defending Shrews must eat ever few hours & their patch aggressively preferring to consume more than their own body spend their time alone. weight every day. Their conservation status is considered to be of Least Concern however their population trend can not be T H E I R I M P O R T A N C E determined due to lack of information. As with all rodents they are immensely important within the food chain. They are essential for Owls - I D E N T I F I C A T I O N both tawny and barn - stoats, weasels, They are all similar in appearance badgers, foxes, kestrels & other but the main differences are: raptors. Common - Brown back, pale sides, However, they are unpalatable due to very pale underneath. Tail half the a musky scent secreted from their body length with little hair. scent glands but it doesn't seem to stop Pygmy - Brown back with pale them being an important food source.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Micromammals of the Early Pliocene Locality of Almenara MB: Biostratigraphical and Palaeoecological Implications
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PALAEONTOLOGY Fossil micromammals of the early Pliocene locality of Almenara MB: biostratigraphical and palaeoecological implications Samuel MANSINO1,2*, Vicente Daniel CRESPO1,2, María LÁZARO1, Francisco Javier RUIZ- SÁNCHEZ1,2,3, Juan ABELLA3,4 & Plinio MONTOYA1 1 Departament de Geologia, Universitat de València, Doctor Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] 2 Museu Valencià d’Història Natural, L’Hort de Feliu, P.O. Box 8460, 46018 Alginet, Valencia, Spain 3 INCYT-UPSE, Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena, 7047, Santa Elena, Ecuador 4 Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifi ci ICTA-ICP, Carrer de les Columnes s/n, Campus de la UAB, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193 Barcelona, Spain * Corresponding author Mansino, S., Crespo, V.D., Lázaro, M., Ruiz-sánchez, F.J., Abella, J. & Montoya, P. 2016. Fossil micromammals of the early Pliocene locality of Almenara MB: biostratigraphical and palaeoecological implications. [Micromamíferos fósiles de la localidad del Plioceno inferior de Almenara MB: implicaciones bioestratigráfi cas y paleoecológicas]. Spanish Journal of Palaeontology, 31 (2), 253-270. Manuscript received 20 October 2015 © Sociedad Española de Paleontología ISSN 2255-0550 Manuscript accepted 04 March 2016 ABSTRACT RESUMEN In this work, we have studied the fossil rodent, insectivore En este trabajo hemos estudiado los roedores, insectívoros and chiropteran faunas, of a new locality from the Almenara- y quirópteros fósiles de una nueva localidad del complejo Casablanca karstic complex, named ACB MB (Castellón, kárstico de Almenara-Casablanca, denominada ACB east Spain).
    [Show full text]
  • Late Miocene Soricidae (Mammalia) Fauna from Tardosbánya (Western Hungary)
    Hantkeniana 2, 103-125 (1998) Budapest Late Miocene Soricidae (Mammalia) fauna from Tardosbánya (Western Hungary) Lukács Gy. MÉszÁRos Eötvös Loránd University, Department ofPalaeontology H-I083 Budapest, Ludovika tér 2, Hungary (Wi th 5 figures, 6 tables and 4 plates) The Soricidae (Mamrnalia, Insectivora) elements of the rich and well preserved fossil vertebrate fauna from Tardosbánya limestone quarry (Western Hungary, Gerecse Mountains) are presented. Five species could have been identified from the material: Amblycoptus oligodon KORMOS 1926, Crusafontina konnosi (BACHMAYER& WILSON, 1970), Blarinella dubia (BACHMAYERand WILSON, 1970), Episoricuius gibberodon (PETÉNYI, 1864) and Paenelimnoecus repenningi (BACHMAYER & WILSON, 1970). The occurrence of Crusafantina, B. dubia and P. repenningi indicates that the age of the sarnple is Late Miocene. The morphometrical studies on C. konnosi, and the morphology and the low relative frequency of A. oligodon suggest that the fauna is correlative with the Turolian MN 12 Zone. The occurrence of A. oligodon, C. konnosi and E. gibberodon indicates well watered, forested environment. Introduction The Late Miocene vertebrate fauna from Tardosbánya quarry was colleeted by D. JÁNOSSY Locality (Hungarian Natural History Museum) in 1975. He gave a prelinúnary faunal list of the sample (1981, Tardosbánya is situated at the northern margin only in manuscript form) and deposited the material of the Transdanubian Central Range (Western in the Geological Museum of Hungary (GMH) (in Hungary), about 10 km north from Tatabánya (see the Geological Institute of Hungary). JÁNOSSYlisted Fig. 1). The remains have been found in a sediment- the following soricids: filled fossil shaft in the Jurassic limestone of the Gerecse Mountains, excavated by exploitation in the - "Petenyia" "red marble" quarry near Tardosbánya.
    [Show full text]
  • Uropsilus, Talpidae): Implications for Taxonomy and Conservation Tao Wan1,2†, Kai He1,3† and Xue-Long Jiang1*
    Wan et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:232 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/232 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Multilocus phylogeny and cryptic diversity in Asian shrew-like moles (Uropsilus, Talpidae): implications for taxonomy and conservation Tao Wan1,2†, Kai He1,3† and Xue-Long Jiang1* Abstract Background: The genus Uropsilus comprises a group of terrestrial, montane mammals endemic to the Hengduan and adjacent mountains. These animals are the most primitive living talpids. The taxonomy has been primarily based on cursory morphological comparisons and the evolutionary affinities are little known. To provide insight into the systematics of this group, we estimated the first multi-locus phylogeny and conducted species delimitation, including taxon sampling throughout their distribution range. Results: We obtained two mitochondrial genes (~1, 985 bp) and eight nuclear genes (~4, 345 bp) from 56 specimens. Ten distinct evolutionary lineages were recovered from the three recognized species, eight of which were recognized as species/putative species. Five of these putative species were found to be masquerading as the gracile shrew mole. The divergence time estimation results indicated that climate change since the last Miocene and the uplift of the Himalayas may have resulted in the diversification and speciation of Uropsilus. Conclusions: The cryptic diversity found in this study indicated that the number of species is strongly underestimated under the current taxonomy. Two synonyms of gracilis (atronates and nivatus) should be given full species status, and the taxonomic status of another three potential species should be evaluated using extensive taxon sampling, comprehensive morphological, and morphometric approaches. Consequently, the conservation status of Uropsilus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 - Introduction
    EURASIAN MIDDLE AND LATE MIOCENE HOMINOID PALEOBIOGEOGRAPHY AND THE GEOGRAPHIC ORIGINS OF THE HOMININAE by Mariam C. Nargolwalla A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Anthropology University of Toronto © Copyright by M. Nargolwalla (2009) Eurasian Middle and Late Miocene Hominoid Paleobiogeography and the Geographic Origins of the Homininae Mariam C. Nargolwalla Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Toronto 2009 Abstract The origin and diversification of great apes and humans is among the most researched and debated series of events in the evolutionary history of the Primates. A fundamental part of understanding these events involves reconstructing paleoenvironmental and paleogeographic patterns in the Eurasian Miocene; a time period and geographic expanse rich in evidence of lineage origins and dispersals of numerous mammalian lineages, including apes. Traditionally, the geographic origin of the African ape and human lineage is considered to have occurred in Africa, however, an alternative hypothesis favouring a Eurasian origin has been proposed. This hypothesis suggests that that after an initial dispersal from Africa to Eurasia at ~17Ma and subsequent radiation from Spain to China, fossil apes disperse back to Africa at least once and found the African ape and human lineage in the late Miocene. The purpose of this study is to test the Eurasian origin hypothesis through the analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of distribution, in situ evolution, interprovincial and intercontinental dispersals of Eurasian terrestrial mammals in response to environmental factors. Using the NOW and Paleobiology databases, together with data collected through survey and excavation of middle and late Miocene vertebrate localities in Hungary and Romania, taphonomic bias and sampling completeness of Eurasian faunas are assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, a New Species of Crocidura (Soricomorpha: Soricidae) From
    Zootaxa 2345: 60–68 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Crocidura (Soricomorpha: Soricidae) from southern Vietnam and north-eastern Cambodia PAULINA D. JENKINS1, ALEXEI V. ABRAMOV2,4, VIATCHESLAV V. ROZHNOV3,4 & ANNETTE OLSSON5 1The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab., 1, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 3A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii pr., 33, Moscow, 119071, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 4Joint Vietnam-Russian Tropical Research and Technological Centre, Nguyen Van Huyen, Nghia Do, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam. E-mail: [email protected] 5Conservation International – Cambodia Programme, P.O. Box 1356, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Knowledge of the Soricidae occurring in Vietnam has recently expanded with the discovery of several species previously unknown to science. Here we describe a new species of white-toothed shrew belonging to the genus Crocidura from lowland areas in southern Vietnam and from a river valley in north-eastern Cambodia. This small to medium sized species is diagnosed on the basis of external features, cranial proportions and morphology of the last upper and lower molars. Comparisons are made with other species of Crocidura known to occur in Vietnam and the biogeography of the regions where the new species has been found, is briefly discussed. Key words: white-toothed shrew, Vietnam, Cambodia Introduction Knowledge of the soricid fauna of South-East Asia and particularly that of Vietnam is still poorly understood, while that of Cambodia is virtually unknown (Jenkins, 1982; Heaney & Timm, 1983; Jenkins & Smith, 1995; Motokawa et al., 2005; Jenkins et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Mobatviruses (Hantaviridae) in Myanmar and Vietnam
    viruses Article Molecular Phylogeny of Mobatviruses (Hantaviridae) in Myanmar and Vietnam Satoru Arai 1, Fuka Kikuchi 1,2, Saw Bawm 3 , Nguyễn Trường Sơn 4,5, Kyaw San Lin 6, Vương Tân Tú 4,5, Keita Aoki 1,7, Kimiyuki Tsuchiya 8, Keiko Tanaka-Taya 1, Shigeru Morikawa 9, Kazunori Oishi 1 and Richard Yanagihara 10,* 1 Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan; [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (F.K.); [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (K.T.-T.); [email protected] (K.O.) 2 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan 3 Department of Pharmacology and Parasitology, University of Veterinary Science, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 15013, Myanmar; [email protected] 4 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam; [email protected] (N.T.S.); [email protected] (V.T.T.) 5 Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam 6 Department of Aquaculture and Aquatic Disease, University of Veterinary Science, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 15013, Myanmar; [email protected] 7 Department of Liberal Arts, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan 8 Laboratory of Bioresources, Applied Biology Co., Ltd., Tokyo 107-0062, Japan; [email protected] 9 Department of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan; [email protected] 10 Pacific Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Research, John A.
    [Show full text]
  • When Beremendiin Shrews Disappeared in East Asia, Or How We Can Estimate Fossil Redeposition
    Historical Biology An International Journal of Paleobiology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20 When beremendiin shrews disappeared in East Asia, or how we can estimate fossil redeposition Leonid L. Voyta , Valeriya E. Omelko , Mikhail P. Tiunov & Maria A. Vinokurova To cite this article: Leonid L. Voyta , Valeriya E. Omelko , Mikhail P. Tiunov & Maria A. Vinokurova (2020): When beremendiin shrews disappeared in East Asia, or how we can estimate fossil redeposition, Historical Biology, DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2020.1822354 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2020.1822354 Published online: 22 Sep 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ghbi20 HISTORICAL BIOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2020.1822354 ARTICLE When beremendiin shrews disappeared in East Asia, or how we can estimate fossil redeposition Leonid L. Voyta a, Valeriya E. Omelko b, Mikhail P. Tiunovb and Maria A. Vinokurova b aLaboratory of Theriology, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia; bFederal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The current paper first time describes a small Beremendia from the late Pleistocene deposits in the Received 24 July 2020 Koridornaya Cave locality (Russian Far East), which associated with the extinct Beremendia minor. The Accepted 8 September 2020 paper is the first attempt to use a comparative analytical method to evaluate a possible case of redeposition KEYWORDS of fossil remains of this shrew.
    [Show full text]
  • Generality and Antiquity of the Island Rule Mark V
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2013) 40, 1427–1439 SYNTHESIS Of mice and mammoths: generality and antiquity of the island rule Mark V. Lomolino1*, Alexandra A. van der Geer2, George A. Lyras2, Maria Rita Palombo3, Dov F. Sax4 and Roberto Rozzi3 1College of Environmental Science and ABSTRACT Forestry, State University of New York, Aim We assessed the generality of the island rule in a database comprising Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA, 2Netherlands 1593 populations of insular mammals (439 species, including 63 species of fos- Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, 3Dipartimento di Scienze sil mammals), and tested whether observed patterns differed among taxonomic della Terra, Istituto di Geologia ambientale e and functional groups. Geoingegneria, Universita di Roma ‘La Location Islands world-wide. Sapienza’ and CNR, 00185, Rome, Italy, 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Methods We measured museum specimens (fossil mammals) and reviewed = Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, the literature to compile a database of insular animal body size (Si mean 02912, USA mass of individuals from an insular population divided by that of individuals from an ancestral or mainland population, M). We used linear regressions to investigate the relationship between Si and M, and ANCOVA to compare trends among taxonomic and functional groups. Results Si was significantly and negatively related to the mass of the ancestral or mainland population across all mammals and within all orders of extant mammals analysed, and across palaeo-insular (considered separately) mammals as well. Insular body size was significantly smaller for bats and insectivores than for the other orders studied here, but significantly larger for mammals that utilized aquatic prey than for those restricted to terrestrial prey.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolutionary View on the Japanese Talpids Based on Nucleotide Sequences
    Mammal Study 30: S19–S24 (2005) © the Mammalogical Society of Japan An evolutionary view on the Japanese talpids based on nucleotide sequences Akio Shinohara1,*, Kevin L. Campbell2 and Hitoshi Suzuki3 1 Department of Bio-resources, Division of Biotechnology, Frontier Science Research Center, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan 2 Department of Zoology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada 3 Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-0810, Japan Abstract. Japanese talpid moles exhibit a remarkable degree of species richness and geographic complexity, and as such, have attracted much research interest by morphologists, cytogeneticists, and molecular phylogeneticists. However, a consensus hypothesis pertaining to the evolutionary history and biogeography of this group remains elusive. Recent phylogenetic studies utilizing nucleotide sequences have provided reasonably consistent branching patterns for Japanese talpids, but have generally suffered from a lack of closely related South-East Asian species for sound biogeographic interpretations. As an initial step in achieving this goal, we constructed phylogenetic trees using publicly accessible mitochondrial and nuclear sequences from seven Japanese taxa, and those of related insular and continental species for which nucleotide data is available. The resultant trees support the view that four lineages (Euroscaptor mizura, Mogera tokuade species group [M. tokudae and M. etigo], M. imaizumii, and M. wogura) migrated separately, and in this order, from the continental Asian mainland to Japan. The close relationship of M. tokudae and M. etigo suggests these lineages diverged recently through a vicariant event between Sado Island and Echigo plain. The origin of the two endemic lineages of Japanese shrew-moles, Urotrichus talpoides and Dymecodon pilirostris, remains ambiguous.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiannual Dynamics of Shrew (Mammalia, Soricomorpha, Soricidae) Communities in the Republic of Moldova
    Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii úi comunicări. ùtiinĠele Naturii. Tom. 27, No. 2/2011 ISSN 1454-6914 MULTIANNUAL DYNAMICS OF SHREW (MAMMALIA, SORICOMORPHA, SORICIDAE) COMMUNITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA NISTREANU Victoria Abstract. The paper is based on the existing bibliographical data, on the collection of vertebrate animals of the Institute of Zoology of AùM and on personal studies performed in the last years on the whole territory of Moldova. During the last 50 years considerable modification of shrew communities in various types of ecosystems on the whole territory of Moldova were registered. The most well adapted species is the common shrew, being dominant in the majority of the studied periods. The bicolour shrew, which was a rare, endangered species, introduced in the Red Book of Moldova, 2nd edition, became one of the most common among shrews in the last few years, while the Mediterranean water shrew that was one of the most abundant in the past century, at present became very rare, because of the pollution and transformation of wet and water habitats. The pygmy shrew is wide spread in various types of ecosystems, but its abundance is always below 25%. The lesser shrew is the most synanthropic species among shrews, its frequency in urban and rural area reaching 80%. The shrew species are good ecological indicators. Further measures on the protection of natural and water habitats must be taken. Keywords: shrew, dynamics, natural and anthropogenic ecosystems. Rezumat. Dinamica multianuală a comunităĠilor de chiĠcani (Mammalia, Soricomorpha, Soricidae) în Republica Moldova. Articolul are la bază datele bibliografice existente, colecĠia de vertebrate terestre a Institutului de Zooogie al AùM úi cercetările personale ale autorului efectuate pe tot teritoriul Moldovei în ultimii ani.
    [Show full text]