DOCSLIB.ORG

Statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Results Survey 357528 Number of records in this query: 1000 Total records in survey: 1000 Percentage of total: 100.00% page 1 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QA1 I agree to these terms and want to participate in the survey. I confirm that I am 16 years of age or over. Answer Count Percentage Yes (A1) 1000 100.00% No answer 0 0.00% page 2 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ001) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [a. Check my email] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 893 89.30% Daily (A2) 92 9.20% Weekly (A3) 10 1.00% Monthly (A4) 2 0.20% Less than monthly (A5) 0 0.00% Never (A6) 3 0.30% No answer 0 0.00% page 3 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ002) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [b. Use instant messaging (e.g. WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger)] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 577 57.70% Daily (A2) 165 16.50% Weekly (A3) 87 8.70% Monthly (A4) 28 2.80% Less than monthly (A5) 33 3.30% Never (A6) 110 11.00% No answer 0 0.00% page 4 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ003) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [c. Make or receive phone and video calls over the Internet (e.g. Apple’s FaceTime, Microsoft’s Skype)] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 84 8.40% Daily (A2) 110 11.00% Weekly (A3) 320 32.00% Monthly (A4) 174 17.40% Less than monthly (A5) 217 21.70% Never (A6) 95 9.50% No answer 0 0.00% page 5 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ004) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [d. Read or write a blog] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 75 7.50% Daily (A2) 197 19.70% Weekly (A3) 258 25.80% Monthly (A4) 159 15.90% Less than monthly (A5) 166 16.60% Never (A6) 145 14.50% No answer 0 0.00% page 6 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ005) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [e. Participate in social networks such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or LinkedIn (e.g. posting messages or other contributions)] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 358 35.80% Daily (A2) 181 18.10% Weekly (A3) 177 17.70% Monthly (A4) 76 7.60% Less than monthly (A5) 78 7.80% Never (A6) 130 13.00% No answer 0 0.00% page 7 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ007) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [f. Watch or upload video on YouTube or another video platform] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 185 18.50% Daily (A2) 235 23.50% Weekly (A3) 310 31.00% Monthly (A4) 97 9.70% Less than monthly (A5) 98 9.80% Never (A6) 75 7.50% No answer 0 0.00% page 8 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ009) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [g. Watch movies or TV programs online through a streaming service such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc.] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 107 10.70% Daily (A2) 185 18.50% Weekly (A3) 279 27.90% Monthly (A4) 85 8.50% Less than monthly (A5) 114 11.40% Never (A6) 230 23.00% No answer 0 0.00% page 9 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ010) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [h. Listen to music online (e.g. through a streaming service, a radio station or otherwise)] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 214 21.40% Daily (A2) 216 21.60% Weekly (A3) 190 19.00% Monthly (A4) 101 10.10% Less than monthly (A5) 135 13.50% Never (A6) 144 14.40% No answer 0 0.00% page 10 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ011) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [i. Play online games] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 58 5.80% Daily (A2) 61 6.10% Weekly (A3) 77 7.70% Monthly (A4) 62 6.20% Less than monthly (A5) 179 17.90% Never (A6) 563 56.30% No answer 0 0.00% page 11 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ012) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [j. Buy or sell goods or services online (e.g. Expedia, Airbnb, Amazon, eBay, Uber)] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 27 2.70% Daily (A2) 50 5.00% Weekly (A3) 273 27.30% Monthly (A4) 307 30.70% Less than monthly (A5) 278 27.80% Never (A6) 65 6.50% No answer 0 0.00% page 12 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB1a(SQ013) How often do you go online and for which of the following activities (for private purposes)? [k. Use storage space on the Internet to save documents, pictures, music, video or other files (e.g. Google Drive, Dropbox, Windows OneDrive, iCloud, Amazon)] Answer Count Percentage Several times a day (A1) 302 30.20% Daily (A2) 196 19.60% Weekly (A3) 171 17.10% Monthly (A4) 101 10.10% Less than monthly (A5) 128 12.80% Never (A6) 102 10.20% No answer 0 0.00% page 13 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB2 Who provides Internet access at your home? Answer Count Percentage Fixed line telephone company (SQ001) 551 55.10% Cable television provider (SQ002) 271 27.10% Satellite television provider (SQ003) 37 3.70% Mobile phone company (SQ004) 292 29.20% Other (e.g. community network, municipal network, Wi-Fi) (SQ005) 133 13.30% page 14 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' Field summary for QB2b Please specify "Other" (e.g. community network, municipal network, Wi-Fi) Answer Count Percentage Answer 133 100.00% No answer 0 0.00% ID Response 78 Optical Fiber company 89 Wi-Fi 90 fibre connection owned by municipal power services, rented to independent small ISP 118 Fibre-to-home ISP 137 Fiberoptic cable is being installed. Not sure who the provider is. Television will still be going on the cable provider. 141 We are a privately owned high tower building which is connected to the MAN-network of the university. The building is a former dorm and the connection is being shifted into a paid rented one. I am the network administrator and also administrate the server and the firewall. 150 wireless via roof antenna 178 wi-fi 195 Commercial ISP 204 WiFi CenturyLink 207 the german community network "Freifunk" (see freifunk.net) 211 university 212 Freifunk community network 218 Freifunk, of course 229 fiber offered by municipality 268 fibreoptic service provider 270 dongles from different companies for different country use 289 Community network 305 BT the fixed line; someone bought Virgin the service and WIFI box; some services accessed by phone 308 Wi-Fi 313 No internet at home 316 ISP 319 wholesale-network-access-based service provider / reseller 326 Wi-Fi 328 Local Area Wifi Provider 334 TalkTalk 338 municipal network/Google Fiber 354 don't have internet at home 387 Fixed line internet provider 394 Relish 396 wi fi 398 Wi-FI 443 wifi 445 Re-seller of wholesale services who owns no fixed infrastructure but provides services via tarifed rates set by the national regulator 471 Wi-Fi 478 Wi-Fi 494 The Phone Coop 495 connection is provided by the landlord to the whole building 496 University through a contract with a fixed line provider. 534 It is a community network in a student residence 546 Wifi 550 University Wi-Fi 568 Wi-Fi 583 wiFi 587 university 602 Wi-Fi 617 community network page 15 / 226 Quick statistics Survey 357528 'Survey on Internet Attitudes' 668 Specialized Internet provider 688 fixed wireless acccess 692 Nomadic/Wifi 710 Public WiFi (e.g. Cafe, Hotel, & Restauran) & University WiFi 727 Fibre. 746 Wi-fi 761 Wi-Fi 768 Municipal network 769 block community network 770 Via my host 782 Internet over long-range Wi-Fi 784 Work; tethering 797 community fibre network 807 wi-fi 829 My own AS, my own fiber. 836 Fiber 1GB/s 858 FTTB 868 WI-FI 878 local isp, not municipal 887 Municipality 891 Wi-Fi 898 Wi-Fi 899 community network 901 guifi.net community network 910 Freifunk 911 Freifunk 912 Freifunk - see freifunk.net 916 municipal network 926 community network 940 Residence network. 963 wi-fi 970 wi fi 982 Fibre optic by a local company for most of the houses in the recent new development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Rule Based Approach for Spam Detection
    A RULE BASED APPROACH FOR SPAM DETECTION Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of degree of Master of Engineering In Computer Science & Engineering By: Ravinder Kamboj (Roll No. 800832030) Under the supervision of: Dr. V.P Singh Mrs. Sanmeet Bhatia Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Computer Science & Engineering Department of SMCA COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THAPAR UNIVERSITY PATIALA – 147004 JULY- 2010 i ii Abstract Spam is defined as a junk Email or unsolicited Email. Spam has increased tremendously in the last few years. Today more than 85% of e-mails that are received by e-mail users are spam. The cost of spam can be measured in lost human time, lost server time and loss of valuable mail. Spammers use various techniques like spam via botnet, localization of spam and image spam. According to the mail delivery process anti-spam measures for Email Spam can be divided in to two parts, based on Emails envelop and Email data. Black listing, grey listing and white listing techniques can be applied on the Email envelop to detect spam. Techniques based on the data part of Email like heuristic techniques and Statistical techniques can be used to combat spam. Bayesian filters as part of statistical technique divides the income message in to words called tokens and checks their probability of occurrence in spam e-mails and ham e-mails. Two types of approaches can be followed for the detection of spam e-mails one is learning approach other is rule based approach. Learning approach required a large dataset of spam e-mails and ham e-mails is required for the training of spam filter; this approach has good time characteristics filter can be retrained quickly for new Spam.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMO. Nº. 52/2017 – SCOM
    00100.096648/2017-00 MEMO. nº. 52/2017 – SCOM Brasília, 21 de junho de 2017 A Sua Excelência a Senhora SENADORA REGINA SOUSA Assunto: Ideia Legislativa nº. 76.334 Senhora Presidente, Nos termos do parágrafo único do art. 6º da Resolução do Senado Federal nº. 19 de 2015, encaminho a Vossa Excelência a Ideia Legislativa nº. 76.334, sob o título de “Criminalização Da Apologia Ao Comunismo”, que alcançou, no período de 09/06/2017 a 20/06/2017, apoiamento superior a 20.000 manifestações individuais, conforme a ficha informativa em anexo. Respeitosamente, Dirceu Vieira Machado Filho Diretor da Secretaria de Comissões Senado Federal – Praça dos Três Poderes – CEP 70.165-900 – Brasília DF ARQUIVO ASSINADO DIGITALMENTE. CÓDIGO DE VERIFICAÇÃO: CE7C06D2001B6231. CONSULTE EM http://www.senado.gov.br/sigadweb/v.aspx. 00100.096648/2017-00 ANEXO AO MEMORANDO Nº. 52/2017 – SCOM - FICHA INFORMATIVA E RELAÇÃO DE APOIADORES - Senado Federal – Praça dos Três Poderes – CEP 70.165-900 – Brasília DF ARQUIVO ASSINADO DIGITALMENTE. CÓDIGO DE VERIFICAÇÃO: CE7C06D2001B6231. CONSULTE EM http://www.senado.gov.br/sigadweb/v.aspx. 00100.096648/2017-00 Ideia Legislativa nº. 76.334 TÍTULO Criminalização Da Apologia Ao Comunismo DESCRIÇÃO Assim como a Lei já prevê o "Crime de Divulgação do Nazismo", a apologia ao COMUNISMO e seus símbolos tem que ser proibidos no Brasil, como já acontece cada vez mais em diversos países, pois essa ideologia genocida causou males muito piores à Humanidade, massacrando mais de 100 milhões de inocentes! (sic) MAIS DETALHES O art. 20 da Lei 7.716/89 estabeleceu o "Crime de Divulgação do Nazismo": "§1º - Fabricar, comercializar, distribuir ou veicular, símbolos, emblemas, ornamentos, distintivos ou propaganda que utilizem a cruz suástica ou gamada, para fins de divulgação do nazismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Today's Fraud Threats: Hackers, Rings, and Mobs
    Reducing Risks; What you need to know about Payment Fraud Wells Fargo Customer Training © 2016 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. All rights reserved. For public use. Agenda . Fraud trends . Online account takeover fraud . Impostor fraud . Call to action 1 Remain vigilant in payment fraud 72% 42% 48% of organizations of them report of organizations were experienced that the number exposed to wire attempted or actual of fraud incidents fraud– a significant payments fraud increased increase from the previous survey Source: 2016 AFP Payments Fraud and Control Survey 2 Online account takeover fraud What is account takeover fraud? 3 Social engineering strategies Classic phishing Email messages sent to large populations designed to obtain confidential information Emails purport to be from trustworthy sources with which victims have established relationships Vishing and smishing Spear-phishing Vishing is where fraudsters Targeted phishing attack connect with their victims via directed at a small group phone of potential victims Smishing is when a fraudulent Emails are focused, have a text message is sent to the high degree of believability victim and a high open rate 4 Phishing successes explained Cybercriminal excellence Social media explosion Accurate logos, professionally Users are sharing an alarmingly written communications, amount of information through personalization of content increase social media platforms believability Provides criminals with the fodder Targets are more likely to click on necessary to construct the links and/or open attachments, personalized and believable which download malware messages Credulous users Users are the first line of defense, yet organizations do not have robust training programs to heighten users’ sensitivity to phishing attempts Bottom Line: Phishing attempts are becoming more challenging and more difficult to address 5 1 in 244 Email malware rate Source: Symantec Internet Security Threat Report, Volume 20, April 2015 Malware improvements Malware has evolved to where it can now: .
    [Show full text]
  • Are Cookie Banners Indeed Compliant with the Law? Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Célestin Matte
    Are cookie banners indeed compliant with the law? Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Célestin Matte To cite this version: Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Célestin Matte. Are cookie banners indeed compliant with the law?: Deciphering EU legal requirements on consent and technical means to verify compli- ance of cookie banners. Technology and Regulation, Tilburg University, 2020, 2020, pp.91-135. 10.26116/TECHREG.2020.009. hal-02875447v2 HAL Id: hal-02875447 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02875447v2 Submitted on 23 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Are cookie banners indeed compliant with the law? Deciphering EU legal requirements on consent and technical means to verify compliance of cookie banners Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Célestin Matte Inria, France [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract In this paper, we describe how cookie banners, as a consent mechanism in web applications, should be designed and implemented to be compliant with the ePrivacy Directive and the GDPR, defining 22 legal requirements. While some are provided by legal sources, others result from the domain expertise of computer scientists. We perform a technical assessment of whether technical (with computer science tools), manual (with a human operator) or user studies verification is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Compromise Associated with Onepercent Group Ransomware
    TLP: WHITE The following information is being provided by the FBI, with no guarantees or 23 AUG 2021 warranties, for potential use at the sole discretion of recipients in order to protect against cyber threats. This data is provided to help cyber security Alert Number professionals and system administrators guard against the persistent malicious CU-000149-MW actions of cyber actors. This FLASH was coordinated with DHS-CISA. WE NEED YOUR HELP! This FLASH has been released TLP: WHITE. Subject to standard copyright rules, If you find any of TLP: WHITE information may be distributed without restriction. these indicators on your networks, or have related Indicators of Compromise Associated with OnePercent information, please contact Group Ransomware www.fbi.gov/con Summary tact-us/field- offices The FBI has learned of a cyber-criminal group who self identifies as the *Note: By reporting “OnePercent Group” and who have used Cobalt Strike to perpetuate any related ransomware attacks against US companies since November 2020. OnePercent information to the Group actors compromise victims through a phishing email in which an FBI, you are assisting in sharing attachment is opened by the user. The attachment’s macros infect the system information that with the IcedID1 banking trojan. IcedID downloads additional software to include allows the FBI to track malicious Cobalt Strike. Cobalt Strike moves laterally in the network, primarily with actors and PowerShell remoting. coordinate with private industry OnePercent Group actors encrypt the data and exfiltrate it from the victims’ and the United systems. The actors contact the victims via telephone and email, threatening to States Government to prevent future release the stolen data through The Onion Router (TOR) network and clearnet, intrusions and unless a ransom is paid in virtual currency.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Fraud and Internet Banking: Threats and Countermeasures
    Report Financial Fraud and Internet Banking: Threats and Countermeasures By François Paget, McAfee® Avert® Labs Report Financial Fraud and Internet Banking: Threats and Countermeasures Table of Contents Some Figures 3 U.S. Federal Trade Commission Statistics 3 CyberSource 4 Internet Crime Complaint Center 4 In Europe 5 The Many Faces of Fraud 6 Small- and large-scale identity theft 7 Carding and skimming 8 Phishing and pharming 8 Crimeware 9 Money laundering 10 Mules 10 Virtual casinos 11 Pump and dump 12 Nigerian advance fee fraud (419 fraud) 12 Auctions 14 Online shopping 16 Anonymous payment methods 17 Protective Measures 18 Scoring 18 Europay, MasterCard, and Visa (EMV) standard 18 PCI-DSS 19 Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Secured Layer (TLS) protocols 19 SSL extended validation 20 3-D Secure technology 21 Strong authentication and one-time password devices 22 Knowledge-based authentication 23 Email authentication 23 Conclusion 24 About McAfee, Inc. 26 Report Financial Fraud and Internet Banking: Threats and Countermeasures Financial fraud has many faces. Whether it involves swindling, debit or credit card fraud, real estate fraud, drug trafficking, identity theft, deceptive telemarketing, or money laundering, the goal of cybercriminals is to make as much money as possible within a short time and to do so inconspicuously. This paper will introduce you to an array of threats facing banks and their customers. It includes some statistics and descriptions of solutions that should give readers—whether they are responsible for security in a financial organization or a customer—an overview of the current situation. Some Figures U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CSCI-UA.9480 Introduction to Computer Security
    CSCI-UA.9480 Introduction to Computer Security Session 2.3 Designing Secure Network Systems Prof. Nadim Kobeissi Goals of today’s class. A look into some secure network systems: ● WireGuard: a modern VPN. ● A critical look at ProtonMail, a secure email service. WireGuard is an example of a well-designed secure network application. ProtonMail is an example of a badly designed network application. CSCI-UA.9480: Introduction to Computer Security – Nadim Kobeissi 2 WireGuard Following slides are by Jason A. 2.3a Donenfeld, author of WireGuard. CSCI-UA.9480: Introduction to Computer Security – Nadim Kobeissi 3 What is WireGuard? ▪ Layer 3 secure network tunnel for IPv4 and IPv6. ▪ Opinionated. Only layer 3! ▪ Designed for the Linux kernel ▪ Slower cross platform implementations also. ▪ UDP-based. Punches through firewalls. ▪ Modern conservative cryptographic principles. ▪ Emphasis on simplicity and auditability. ▪ Authentication model similar to SSH’s authenticated_keys. ▪ Replacement for OpenVPN and IPsec. ▪ Grew out of a stealth rootkit project. ▪ Techniques desired for stealth are equally as useful for tunnel defensive measures. Security Design Principle 1: Easily Auditable OpenVPN Linux XFRM StrongSwan SoftEther WireGuard 116,730 LoC 119,363 LoC 405,894 LoC 329,853 LoC 3,771 LoC Plus OpenSSL! Plus StrongSwan! Plus XFRM! Less is more. Security Design Principle 1: Easily Auditable WireGuard 3,771 LoC IPsec SoftEther OpenVPN (XFRM+StrongSwan) 329,853 LoC 119,363 419,792 LoC LoC Security Design Principle 2: Simplicity of Interface ▪ WireGuard presents a normal network interface: # ip link add wg0 type wireguard # ip address add 192.168.3.2/24 dev wg0 # ip route add default via wg0 # ifconfig wg0 … # iptables –A INPUT -i wg0 … /etc/hosts.{allow,deny}, bind(), … ▪ Everything that ordinarily builds on top of network interfaces – like eth0 or wlan0 – can build on top of wg0.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Spam Detection Techniques
    ISSN (Online) : 2278-1021 ISSN (Print) : 2319-5940 International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering Vol. 3, Issue 12, December 2014 A survey on spam detection techniques Anjali Sharma1, Manisha 2, Dr.Manisha 3 , Dr.Rekha Jain 4 1,2,3,4 Bansthali Vidyapith, Jaipur Campus, India Abstract: Today e-mails have become one of the most popular and economical forms of communication for Internet users. Thus due to its popularity, the e-mail is going to be misused. One such misuse is the posting of unwelcome, unwanted e-mails known as spam or junk e-mails [1]. E-mail spam has various consequences. It reduces productivity, takes extra space in mail boxes, extra time, extend software damaging viruses, and materials that contains potentially harmful information for Internet users, destroy stability of mail servers, and as a result users spend lots of time for sorting incoming mail and deleting unwanted correspondence. So there is a need of spam detection so that its consequences can be reduced [2]. In this paper, we present various spam detection techniques. Keywords: Spam, Spam detection techniques, Email classification I. INTRODUCTION Spam refers to unsolicited commercial email. Also known firewalls; therefore, it is an especially useful way for as junk mail, spam floods Internet users’ electronic spammers. It targets the users when they join any chat mailboxes. These junk mails can contain various types of room to find new friends. It spoils enjoy of people and messages such as pornography, commercial advertising, waste their time also. doubtful product, viruses or quasi legal services [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Gmail Hacker for Mac Free
    1 / 2 Gmail Hacker For Mac Free 11 сент. 2015 г. — First of all, personal email services weren't free if you wanted any ... Here are 10 apps that provide the best Gmail hacks on the list .... A powered-off MacBook can be compromised in less than three minutes. ... How To 10/03/2012 2:22 pm : Hack WiFi Passwords for Free Wireless Internet on Your .... 21 авг. 2020 г. — Gmail Hacker Keygen & Serial Key Full Free Download ... Secure hacking for passwords; IP and MAC Address hidden at all times .... A Simple Hack to Avail Free VPN Accounts . We try to all time … Read More online vpn hotspot ofvh. You use your Google account for Gmail, but you also might us.. For best result repeat the scan more than once, especially If your internet connection so slow *** If your internet connection so slow , feel that someone .... 8 мар. 2021 г. — Hack Gmail Account Free Mac. Hack Gmail Account 2020 – Today on SocialPositives.com, we are looking at Gmail Password Hack techniques 2018.. 12 февр. 2020 г. — Gmail Password Hacker has been rated 4.7/5 by 1991 votes! What is Gmail Password Hacker Gmail Password Hacker is a FREE account password ... Hack other players' devices and defend yours to build a reputation in the hacking world. Spyzie will allow you to hack the Gmail account password quickly. Free .... ... 2021 · Email Hacker is a free email hacking tool capable of hacking email ... of WhatsApp) Method 4: How to Hack WhatsApp via Spoofing the MAC Address.. Hack Gmail Password For Free Mac | Peatix.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Ethics (Former Journalist)
    DATAETHICS Nanna H Bach Pia Thomassen Pernille Tranberg Lili The Lazy Cocker Advisor in data ethics (former journalist) Author of 6 books incl FAKE IT (2012) and DataEthics - The New Competitive Advantage (2016) Co-founder of the ThinkDoTank DataEthics.eu Pernille Tranberg Privacy Tech findx.com adblockfast Cliqz FakeNameGenerator.com disconnect.me Hushfile startpage.com Protonmail wire.com IBVPN.COM TOR OPERA Consumers/Citizens ➤ 7 of 10 worried about their data ➤ Have started to ACT on their worry. E.g. w adblockers, 1 of 3 Europeans lie about their data (the younger the better) ➤ We trust the regulated and distrust those tracking us: social media, search, news ➤ We understand the value of our data and want control ➤ Convenience rules! But there is a creepiness limit Sources: datatilsynet.no Eurobarometer on DataProtection 2015, Symantec State of Privacy 2015, Erhvervsstyrelsen/IDA 2015 , Ctrl-Shift Sept 2016, Danmarks Statistik 2017, McKinsey Comscore Jan 2017 We are with data where we were with the environment in the beginning of 1960s The New Green digital mistrust Political & Commercial Manipulation Price discrimination or differentiaton Pay-as-you-behave ➤ Not based on solidarity or for the better of society ➤ It gives the employer or insurance company a lot of power over individuals who is responsible? Government ➤ enforce the law Companies & Institutions ➤ promote the new market ➤ create digital trust with data for privacy tech and data ethics ethics ➤ give customers control over ➤ be a role model own data shared responsibility ➤ Innovate w Privacy by Design Individuals ➤ digital selfdefense ➤ demand it from gov ➤ chose ethical alternatives Definition DATA ETHICS is responsible and sustainable use of personal data.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Anti-Spam Guide 1
    Asian Anti-Spam Guide 1 © MediaBUZZ Pte Ltd January 2009 Asian Anti-SpamHighlights Guide 2 • Combating the latest inbound threat: Spam and dark traffic, Pg. 13 • Secure Email Policy Best Practices, Pg. 17 • The Continuous Hurdle of Spam, Pg. 29 • Asian Anti Spam Acts, Pg. 42 Contents: • Email Spam: A Rising Tide 4 • What everyone should know about spam and privacy 7 • Scary Email Issues of 2008 12 • Combating the latest inbound threat: Spam and dark 13 • Proofpoint survey viewed spam as an increasing threat 16 • Secure Email Policy Best Practices 17 • Filtering Out Spam and Scams 24 • The Resurgence of Spam 26 • 2008 Q1 Security Threat landscape 27 • The Continuous Hurdle of Spam 29 • Spam Filters are Adaptive 30 • Liberating the inbox: How to make email safe and pro- 31 ductive again • Guarantee a clear opportunity to opt out 33 • The Great Balancing Act: Juggling Collaboration and 34 Authentication in Government IT Networks • The Not So Secret Cost of Spam 35 • How to Avoid Spam 36 • How to ensure your e-mails are not classified as spam 37 • Blue Coat’s Top Security Trends for 2008 38 • The Underground Economy 40 • Losing Email is No Longer Inevitable 42 • Localized malware gains ground 44 • Cyber-crime shows no signs of abating 45 MEDIABUZZ PTE LTD • Asian Anti-Spam Acts 47 ASIAN ANTI-SPAM GUIDE © MediaBUZZ Pte Ltd January 2009 Asian Anti-SpamHighlights Guide 3 • Frost & Sullivan: Do not underestimate spam, Pg. 65 • Unifying email security is key, Pg. 71 • The many threats of network security, Pg. 76 • The UTM story, Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Others for Future U.S. Army Operations in and Through the Information Environment CASE STUDIES
    C O R P O R A T I O N Lessons from Others for Future U.S. Army Operations in and Through the Information Environment CASE STUDIES Christopher Paul, Colin P. Clarke, Michael Schwille, Jakub P. Hlávka, Michael A. Brown, Steven S. Davenport, Isaac R. Porche III, Joel Harding For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1925z2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9997-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photos (clockwise from top left): Giorgio Montersino via Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0); U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Adawn Kelsey; U.S. Air Force photo by Tech Sgt John Gordinier; U.S. Air National Guard photo by Master Sgt Andrew J. Moseley; Russian Ministry of Defence (CC BY 4.0); North Korean national media Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous.
    [Show full text]