Legislator Legislator Email Sen. Michael Barrett [email protected] Sen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Legislator Legislator Email Sen. Michael Barrett Mike.Barrett@Masenate.Gov Sen

Legislator Legislator Email Sen. Michael Barrett [email protected] Sen. Joseph Boncore [email protected] Sen. Michael Brady [email protected] Sen. Harriette Chandler [email protected] Sen. James Eldridge [email protected] Sen. Anne Gobi [email protected] Rep. Danielle Gregoire [email protected] Rep. Patricia Haddad [email protected] Sen. Ryan Fattman [email protected] Sen. Linda Forry [email protected] Sen. Donald Humason [email protected] Sen. Joan Lovely [email protected] Sen. Thomas McGee [email protected] Sen. Michael Moore [email protected] Sen. Patrick O'Connor Patrick.O'[email protected] Sen. Joan Lovely [email protected] Sen. Marc Pacheco [email protected] Rep. Daniel Cahill [email protected] Rep. Linda Campbell [email protected] Rep. Gailanne Cariddi [email protected] Rep. Mark Cusack [email protected] Rep. Josh Cutler [email protected] Rep. David DeCoste [email protected] Rep. Daniel Donahue [email protected] Rep. Kimberely Ferguson [email protected] Rep. William Galvin [email protected] Rep. Susan Gifford [email protected] Rep. Joseph McGonagle [email protected] Rep. Mathew Muratore [email protected] Rep. James O'Day James.O'[email protected] Rep. Keiko Orrall [email protected] Rep. Sarah Peake [email protected] Rep. Alice Peisch [email protected] Rep. Paul Schmid [email protected] Rep. Frank Smizik [email protected] Rep. William Straus [email protected] Rep. John Velis [email protected] Rep. David Vieira [email protected] Rep. James Kelcourse [email protected] Rep. Christopher Markey [email protected] Rep. Brad Hill [email protected] Rep. Michael Moran [email protected] Rep. Robert Koczera [email protected] Rep. Chris Walsh [email protected] Rep. Paul Tucker [email protected] Rep. Jerry Parisella [email protected].

Copy Link

Recommended publications

MARCH 19 Layout 1
Focus at MHA on Still no room Congresswoman Clark respect, integrity, sees value of loan repay compassion at the inn VIEWPOINTS: DITORIAL PROVIDER PROFILE: E : PAGE 5 PAGE 4 PAGE 3 Vol. 40 - No. 3 The Newspaper of the Providers’ Council March 2019 Roundtable Federal, state discussion policy work gone to pot in spotlight he Providers’ Council and Massa- Organizations need to chusetts Nonprofit Network sent Ta joint letter to Congressman update policies, train staff Richard Neal (D-Mass.), Chair of the he legalization of marijuana usage Joint Committee on Taxation, urging in Massachusetts – for both medic- the immediate repeal of the new income Tinal and recreational purposes – is tax on expenses incurred by nonprofits creating new challenges and questions for providing employee transportation for human services providers about use benefits, such as parking and transit by both employees and clients. passes. Together, the Council and MNN Nearly 40 people representing 27 represent nearly 1,000 nonprofit or- Providers’ Council member organizations ganizations throughout Massachusetts. attended an HR Roundtable on Mari- The new tax – officially Internal Rev- juana Legalization Policies and Proce- enue Code Section 512(a)(7) – is a part dures hosted by the Council on Feb. 20 of the sweeping tax code reform passed in Needham to discuss their challenges in 2017 and the first payments will be and learn about best practices. due in a matter of weeks. It imposes a A panel – including attorneys Jeffrey 21 percent tax on nonprofits offering Hirsch and Peter Moser from the law firm transportation-related benefits to em- Hirsch Roberts Weinstein LLP; Senior ployees.
[Show full text]
Protect Your Collective Bargaining Rights!
PROTECT YOUR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RIGHTS! On April 26th, a majority of the members of the Massachusetts of House Representatives voted to dramatically restrict the rights of municipal employees to collectively bargain over the issue of health insurance. It is critically important that you let your Representative know how you feel about their vote. These Representatives voted IN FAVOR of your collective bargaining rights: Democrats: Geraldo Alicea Denise Andrews Bruce Ayers Michael Brady Paul Brodeur Thomas Calter Christine Canavan James Cantwell Tackey Chan Nicholas Collins Edward Coppinger Geraldine Creedon Mark Cusack Marcos Devers James Dwyer Lori Ehrlich Christopher Fallon Robert Fennell John Fresolo Denise Garlick Coleen Garry John Mahoney Paul Mark James Miceli Kevin Murphy Rhonda Nyman James O’Day Thomas Petrolati Denise Provost Kathi-Anne Reinstein Carl Sciortino Joyce Spiliotis Thomas Stanley David Sullivan Walter Timilty Timothy Toomey Cleon Turner Marty Walsh Steven Walsh Alice Wolf Republicans: Bradford Hill Daniel Winslow If your state representative stood up for you, it is important that you call them and thank them for their support. You can say something like this: My name is ____________________ and I live in __________________. I work for the city/town of ___________ as a _____________. I am calling because Rep. ____________ voted in favor of maintaining collective bargaining rights for municipal workers like me. I wanted to thank Rep. ______________ for standing up for my union rights. These Representatives voted AGAINST
[Show full text]
Presidential Candidates Senate Candidates Congressional
Presidential Candidates Presidential Candidates Party Position Joe Biden Democrat Anti-Life Endorsed by Donald Trump* Republican Pro-Life the MCFL FedPAC Senate Candidates Senate Candidate Party Position Edward Markey* Democrat Anti-Life Kevin O'Connor Republican Congressional Candidates MCFL Fed PAC Congressional Candidates Candidate's Name Party Position Endorsements First District Richard E. Neal* Democrat Anti-Life James P. McGovern* Democrat Anti-Life Second District Tracy Lyn Lovvorn Republican Third District Lori L. Trahan* Democrat Anti-Life Jake Auchincloss Democrat Anti-Life Fourth District Julie A. Hall Republican Katherine M. Clark* Democrat Anti-Life Fifth District Endorsed by Caroline Colarusso Republican Pro-Life the MCFL Fed PAC Seth Moulton* Democrat Anti-Life Sixth District John P. Moran Republican Seventh District Ayanna S. Pressley* Democrat Anti-Life Eighth District Stephen F. Lynch* Democrat Anti-Life Bill Keating* Democrat Anti-Life Ninth District Helen Brady Republican State Senate Candidates Doctor- State Senate District Candidate's Name Party Abortion Prescribed Position Suicide Position Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin & Adam G. Hinds* Democrat Anti-Life Hampden Bristol & Norfolk Paul R. Feeney* Democrat Anti-Life First Bristol and Plymouth Michael J. Rodrigues* Democrat Mixed Anti-Life Second Bristol and Plymouth Mark C. Montigny* Democrat Anti-Life Cape & Islands Julian A. Cyr* Democrat Anti-Life First Essex Diana Dizoglio* Democrat Anti-Life Second Essex Joan B. Lovely* Democrat Anti-Life Third Essex Brendan P. Crighton* Democrat Anti-Life First Essex & Middlesex Bruce E. Tarr* Republican Mixed Second Essex & Middlesex Barry R. Finegold* Democrat Anti-Life Hampden Adam Gomez Democrat Anti-Life First Hampden & Hampshire Eric P. Lesser* Democrat Anti-Life John C.
[Show full text]
2013-2014 Legislative Scorecard
Legislative Scorecard Votes and Leadership 2013-14 LEGISLATIVE SESSION - 1 - This is the inaugural edition of the Environmental League of Massachusetts legislative scorecard. We produced this scorecard to inform citizens about how their legislators voted on important environmental issues. We are pleased and grateful for the support of so many environmental leaders in the legislature. The scorecard relies first on roll call votes on legislation that deals with environmental and energy issues. Because there are so few roll call votes each session—and often these votes are unanimous—we have scored additional actions by legislators to further distinguish environmental champions. Bonus points were awarded to legislators who introduced bills that were ELM priorities or who introduced important amendments, particularly budget amendments to increase funding for state environmental agencies. In addition, we subtracted points for legislators who introduced legislation or amendments that we opposed. We want to recognize leadership and courage, in addition to votes, and have made every attempt to be fair and transparent in our scoring. Much happens during the legislative process that is impractical to score such as committee redrafts, committee votes to move or hold a bill, and measures that would improve flawed legislation. We have not attempted to include these actions, but we recognize that they greatly influence the process and outcomes. None of the bills or amendments scored here should be a surprise to legislators in terms of ELM’s support or opposition. Going forward, ELM will include votes and other actions that support additional revenues for transportation and promote transit, walking and biking. George Bachrach, President Erica Mattison, Legislative Director Highlights of the Session projects.
[Show full text]
Advocacy for Policy Change
Advocacy for Policy Change Brandeis students work to reform Massachusetts law November 2020 Advocacy for Policy Change is a part of a national program, ENACT: The Educational Network for Active Civic Transformation. ENACT was made possible by a generous gift from Ethics Center International Advisory Board Member Norbert Weissberg and his wife, former Board Member Judith Schneider. In spring of 2019 ENACT was awarded a multi-year grant from the Teagle Foundation’s “Education for American Civic Life” initiative to expand to all 50 states and to enhance ENACT’s digital platform. t Norbert Weissberg and Judith Schneider at “Present and Defend: Projects from Advocacy for Policy Change,” April 2011. For more information about the projects in this report, visit www.brandeis.edu/ethics/atbrandeis/advocacy To learn about ENACT: The Educational Network for Active Civic Transformation, and to sign up for updates, visit go.brandeis.edu/ENACT Photos: David J. Weinstein except page 2: Mike Lovett and page 4 (bottom): Evan Berry Editorial Assistant: Elaina Pevide ’20 Table of Contents n Introduction 2 Melissa Stimell n A Message from Jay Kaufman ’68, MA ’73 4 n Required Project Components 5 n Ensuring Equitable Health Coverage for Children 6 Erin Chambers ’20 & Kalianni Neal Desatnik ’20 n Removing Obstacles and Expanding Abortion Access 12 Allia Service ’22 & Emma Wolters’20 n Fair Scheduling of Employees 18 Emily Rae Foreman ’20 & Elaina Pevide ’20 n Preventing Overdose Deaths and Increasing Access to Treatment 24 James Parkhill ’21 & Abby Smurzynski
[Show full text]
CLM Endorsed Legislation
40 COURT STREET, SUITE 410, BOSTON, MA 02108 | 617-695-1991 | WWW.CHILDRENSLEAGUE.ORG CLM Endorsed Legislation AN ACT RELATIVE TO MANDATED REPORTER REFORM (H.137) The bill establishes a Special Commission to review the existing mandated reporter law and make recommendations to improve the response and prevention of child abuse and neglect. The Commission will be composed of the OCA, DCF, EEC, the AG, CPCS, and CLM. FILED BY: SEN. JOAN LOVELY & REP. KAY KHAN LEAD BY: CHAIR KAY KHAN AN ACT RELATIVE TO EXPUNGEMENT (S.900) In 2018, Massachusetts passed legislation that created an opportunity to expunge juvenile and adult criminal records for folks whose offense was charged prior to their 21st birthday. The law created a significant limit: In order to expunge a record, there can only be one court case on the record. In effect, anyone who has a second or subsequent court case would be ineligible for expungement. This is a missed opportunity to tackle recidivism. This bill will close major gaps in the proposal by removing the only one court case restriction for cases charged prior to the individual’s 21st birthday and instead would limit eligibility by how long ago the individual had their last court case—allowing individuals to expunge their records if their last offense was three years (for misdemeanors) or seven years (for felonies) ago and they have no subsequent court case since. It will also reduce the number of offenses that are categorically ineligible for expungement (while keeping judicial discretion on the review of expungement requests), reduce the time to seal juvenile records for non- adjudications and allow for automatic sealing of eligible records.
[Show full text]
190Th General Court Senate, Alpha by Last Name 2018-02-23
Position Determined State Senate Candidates by Various Data State Senate District INCUMBENT IS CAPITALIZED Beginning of Life End of Life Third Middlesex MICHAEL J. BARRETT (D) Anti-life Anti-life First Suffolk and Middlesex JOSEPH BONCORE (D) Second Plymouth and Bristol MICHAEL BRADY (D) Second Suffolk and Middlesex WILLIAM N. BROWNSBERGER (D) Anti-life Anti-life First Worcester HARRIETTE L. CHANDLER (D) Anti-life Second Suffolk SONIA ROSA CHANG-DIAZ (D) Anti-life First Middlesex and Norfolk CYNTHIA STONE CREEM (D) Anti-life Anti-life Cape and Islands Julian Andre Cyr (D) Plymouth and Barnstable VINNY M. DEMACEDO (R) Pro-life Pro-life Middlesex and Suffolk SAL N. DIDOMENICO (D) Anti-life Fourth Middlesex KENNETH J. DONNELLY (D) Anti-life Anti-life First Middlesex EILEEN M. DONOGHUE (D) Anti-life Pro-life Middlesex and Worcester JAMES B. ELDRIDGE (D) Anti-life Anti-life Worcester and Norfolk RYAN C. FATTMAN (R) Pro-life Pro-life Bristol and Norfolk Paul Feeney (D) Anti-life Anti-life First Suffolk Vacant Worcester, Hampden, Hampshire and Middlesex ANNE M. GOBI (D) Anti-life Anti-life Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden Adam G. Hinds (D) Second Hampden and Hampshire DONALD F. HUMASON, SR. (R) Pro-life Pro-life Second Middlesex PATRICIA D. JEHLEN (D) Anti-life Anti-life Norfolk and Plymouth JOHN F. KEENAN (D) Anti-life Pro-life Second Essex and Middlesex BARBARA A. L'ITALIEN (D) Anti-life Anti-life First Hampden and Hampshire ERIC LESSER (D) Anti-life Fifth Middlesex JASON M. LEWIS (D) Anti-life Second Essex JOAN B. LOVELY (D) Anti-life Anti-life Second Bristol and Plymouth MARK C.
[Show full text]
HOUSE ...No. 4678
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 4846 FILED ON: 6/9/2016 HOUSE . No. 4678 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _________________ PRESENTED BY: Paul Tucker and Joan B. Lovely _________________ To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General Court assembled: The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill: An Act relative to the taxation of cider. _______________ PETITION OF: NAME: DISTRICT/ADDRESS: DATE ADDED: Paul Tucker 7th Essex 6/9/2016 Joan B. Lovely Second Essex 6/9/2016 David Paul Linsky 5th Middlesex 6/20/2019 John W. Scibak 2nd Hampshire 6/22/2016 Denise Provost 27th Middlesex 6/22/2016 James M. Cantwell 4th Plymouth 6/22/2016 Tricia Farley-Bouvier 3rd Berkshire 6/20/2019 Carlos Gonzalez 10th Hampden 6/20/2019 Thomas P. Walsh 12th Essex 6/22/2016 Kate Hogan 3rd Middlesex 6/22/2016 Byron Rushing 9th Suffolk 6/22/2016 Chris Walsh 6th Middlesex 6/22/2016 Ryan C. Fattman Worcester and Norfolk 6/27/2016 1 of 1 HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 4846 FILED ON: 6/9/2016 HOUSE . No. 4678 By Representative Tucker of Salem and Senator Lovely, a joint petition (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Paul Tucker and others relative to the taxation of certain alcoholic beverages. Revenue. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts _______________ In the One Hundred and Eighty-Ninth General Court (2015-2016) _______________ An Act relative to the taxation of cider. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1 SECTION 1.
[Show full text]
Legislative Profiles Spring 2019 |
Legislative Profiles Spring 2019 | Announcement Inside This Issue This portfolio contains the profiles of all legislators that belong to PG. 2: Forward key committees within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. PG. 4: House Bill – H.2366 Each key committee will play a role in the review and approval of the retirement bills that have been filed. PG. 8: Senate Bill – SD.1962 PG. 11: Joint Committee on Public Service – Profiles PG. 29: House Ways & Means – Profiles This portfolio is for the members of MCSA to use to determine PG. 63: House Committee on Third Reading – Profiles which members reside within their regions so contact can be made with each legislator for support of both retirement bills. PG. 67: Senate Ways & Means – Profiles PG. 86: Senate Committee on Third Reading – Profiles PG. 92: Talking Point Tips PG. 93: Legislative Members by MCSA Regions FORWARD Many of us do not have experience with advocating for legislation or meeting with our legislative representatives. This booklet was created with each you in mind to assist in determining which members reside within your region or represent your town and city. We request you contact your respective legislators for support of both retirement bills. If you are familiar with the legislative process and your representatives this may seem rudimentary. The Massachusetts Legislature is comprised of 200 members elected by the people of the Commonwealth. The Senate is comprised of 40 members, with each representing a district of approximately 159,000 people. The House of Representatives is comprised of 160 members, with each legislator representing districts consisting of approximately 40,000 people.
[Show full text]
Bristol County
YOUTH JUSTICE VOTER GUIDE AND LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD: MASSACHUSETTS 2020 BRISTOL COUNTY WELCOME LETTER Each year, thousands of young people in Massachusetts come in contact with the juvenile justice system. These young people are disproportionately children of color, children from the child welfare system, children coming from areas of concentrated poverty, and LGBTQ children. For the majority of these young people, interactions with the juvenile justice system are overwhelmingly negative, and lead to poor outcomes and even increased delinquency. Progress in reforming our legal system into one that is fair and works to create positive outcomes for all system-involved youth, creating stronger and safer communities for everyone, is dependent on elected officials who support or oppose these reforms. This non-partisan voter guide is intended to ensure that you, as a voter, know your rights and are informed in our decisions. The primary focus of this voter guide is to provide the voting record of state elected officials currently in office. We also compiled information on resources from MassVOTE and the Massachusetts Chapter of the League of Women Voters regarding candidate forums in contested elections. This voter guide is intended for educational purposes. The above not-for-profit, non-partisan organizations do not endorse any candidates or political parties for public office. Table of Contents WELCOME LETTER IMPORTANT VOTER INFORMATION IMPORTANT ELECTION DATES SPECIAL COVID-19 ELECTION LAWS: VOTE SAFELY BY MAIL THE KEY ISSUES QUESTIONS TO ASK CANDIDATES IN CONTESTED ELECTIONS VOTING RECORD METHODOLOGY KEY TO THE SCORECARD Bristol County State Senators Bristol County State Representatives PARTNERS IMPORTANT VOTER INFORMATION Am I eligible to vote? You must be at least 18 years old, a US citizen on election day and registered to vote at least 10 days before the election.
[Show full text]
View the Vote Chart
UPDATE THE BOTTLE BILL YES! I pledge to help. The Bottle Bill (5¢ deposit on some beverage containers) is the single most successful recycling tool in the country. But the Updated Bottle Bill—adding water, juice and sports drinks to the deposits—is being blocked by powerful business interests on Beacon Hill. The Updated Bottle Bill (H890/S1650) will reduce litter, increase recycling, and save cities and towns money in trash disposal and litter cleanup. In fact, 208 cities and towns, 375 small businesses, and 90 state and local organizations have endorsed our campaign and joined the effort to pass this bill. Despite this overwhelming support, the Updated Bottle Bill has been “bottled up” in the Legislature for more than a decade. It has never been brought to the floor for a vote, and we need your help now. No more delays! Here’s how you can help: STEP 1: To find out the name of your representative and senator, go to www.WhereDoIVoteMA.com STEP 2: Find out where your legislators stand on the Updated Bottle Bill. See the back of this flyer for a complete guide. STEP 3: Call your state senator and representative today. The State House main number is (617) 722- 2000. Ask for your senator (and then call back and ask for your representative). Tell them: “I am a voter in (name your town) and I support the Updated Bottle Bill. There should be no more delays, this bill needs to come up for a vote now.” (If your legislator supports the Updated Bottle Bill, make sure to thank them, if they are undecided or not supporting the bill, ask them to consider supporting the bill.) STEP 4: After you call, please email [email protected] to let us know your legislator’s response.
[Show full text]
The General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State House, Boston, MA 02133-1053
The General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State House, Boston, MA 02133-1053 April 7, 2020 David L. Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington DC 20240 Dear Secretary Bernhardt, We are deeply dismayed and disappointed with the Department of the Interior's recent decision to disestablish and take lands out of trust for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe on March 27, 2020. Not since the mid-twentieth century has an Interior Secretary taken action to disestablish a reservation. This outrageous decision comes as we mark 400 years since the arrival of the Pilgrims in 1620 and recognize the People of the First Light who inhabited these shores for centuries before contact. The Department’s capricious action brings shame to your office and to our nation. Your decision was cruel and it was unnecessary. You were under no court order to take the Wampanoag land out of trust. Further, litigation to uphold the Mashpee Wampanoag’s status as a tribe eligible for the benefits of the Indian Reorganization Act is ongoing. Your intervention was without merit and completely unnecessary. The fact that the Department made this announcement on a Friday afternoon in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates a callous disregard for human decency. Mashpee Wampanoag leaders were focused on protecting members of their tribe, mobilizing health care resources, and executing response plans when they received your ill-timed announcement. As you are well aware, the Department of the Interior holds a federal trust responsibility to tribes, which includes the protection of Native American lands.
[Show full text]