KLENOT Project 2002–2008 Contribution to NEO Astrometric Follow￿up

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

KLENOT Project 2002–2008 Contribution to NEO Astrometric Follow￿up KLENOT Project 2002-2008 contribution to NEO astrometric follow-up Item Type Article; text Authors Ticha, J.; Tichy, M.; Kocer, M.; Honkova, M. Citation Ticha, J., Tichy, M., Kocer, M., & Honkova, M. (2009). KLENOT Project 2002–2008 contribution to NEO astrometric followup. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 44(12), 1889-1895. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb01998.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 26/09/2021 15:11:35 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/656652 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 44, Nr 12, 1889–1895 (2009) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org KLENOT Project 2002–2008 contribution to NEO astrometric follow-up Jana TICHA1*, Milos TICHY1, Michal KOCER1, and Michaela HONKOVA1 1Klet Observatory, Zatkovo nabrezi 4, CZ-370 01 Ceske Budejovice South Bohemia, Czech Republic *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 23 November 2008; revision accepted 16 January 2009) Abstract–Near-Earth object (NEO) research plays an increasingly important role not only in solar system science but also in protecting our planetary environment as well as human society from the asteroid and comet hazard. Consequently, interest in detecting, tracking, cataloguing, and the physical characterizing of these bodies has steadily grown. The discovery rate of current NEO surveys reflects progressive improvement in a number of technical areas. An integral part of NEO discovery is astrometric follow-up crucial for precise orbit computation and for the reasonable judging of future close encounters with the Earth, including possible impact solutions. The KLENOT Project of the Klet Observatory (South Bohemia, Czech Republic) is aimed especially at the confirmation, early follow-up, long-arc follow-up, and recovery of near-Earth objects. It ranks among the world’s most prolific professional NEO follow-up programs. The 1.06 m KLENOT telescope, put into regular operation in 2002, is the largest telescope in Europe used exclusively for observations of minor planets and comets, and full observing time is dedicated to the KLENOT team. In this paper, we present the equipment, technology, software, observing strategy, and results of the KLENOT Project obtained during its first phase from March 2002 to September 2008. The results consist of thousands of precise astrometric measurements of NEOs and also three newly discovered near-Earth asteroids. Finally, we also discuss future plans reflecting also the role of astrometric follow-up in connection with the modus operandi of the next generation surveys. INTRODUCTION 22.0 mag. or brighter, i.e., whose estimated diameter exceeds about 140 meters. Currently, almost 1000 PHAs are known. There are various kinds of small bodies orbiting the Sun. NASA proposed the Spaceguard goal of discovering The near-Earth objects (NEOs) are the closest neighbors of 90 percent of all NEOs with a diameter greater than 1 km by the Earth-Moon system. NEO research is an expanding field the end of 2008. In 2007, the Spaceguard goal was modified of astronomy, important both for solar system science and for to detect, track, catalogue, and characterize 90 percent of all protecting human society from the asteroid and comet hazard. potentially hazardous objects (PHOs) larger than 140 m by NEOs are sources of impact risk and represent usually a low- the end of 2020. One can estimate that there may be about probability but potentially a very high-consequence natural 100,000 NEAs with diameters exceeding 140 m. hazard. Studies of NEOs contributed significantly to our Virtual impactors (VIs) are asteroids for which possible overall understanding of the solar system, its origin, and impact solutions, compatible with the existing observations, evolution. are known, and a very small but definitely non-zero, Near-Earth objects are asteroids and comets with probability of collision with Earth exists. Virtual impactors perihelion distance q less than 1.3 AU. The vast majority of are listed on the Sentry Impact Risk page hosted by the NASA NEOs are asteroids, referred to as near-Earth asteroids Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Chamberlin et al. 2001) and on the (NEAs). NEAs are divided into four groups (Amors, Apollos, NEODys Risk Page maintained by the University of Pisa Atens, and IEOs) according to their perihelion distance, which operates the impact risk monitoring system aphelion distance, and their semi-major axes. There are CLOMON2 (Milani et al. 2005). As new positional currently more than 5700 known NEAs. observations become available, the most likely outcome is Potentially hazardous asteroids (PHAs) are NEAs whose that the object’s orbit is improved, uncertainties are reduced, minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) with the Earth is impact solutions are ruled out for the next 100 years, and the 0.05 AU or less, and whose absolute magnitude H is H = object will eventually be removed from these lists. 1889 © The Meteoritical Society, 2009. Printed in USA. 1890 J. Ticha et al. Astrometric follow-up is essential also for targets of Minor Planet Center (MPC) (Marsden et al. 1998). Such NEO future radar observations, space mission targets and other candidates need rapid astrometric follow-up to confirm both observing campaigns. their real existence as a solar system body and the proximity The discovery rate of current NEO surveys reflects an of their orbits to that of the Earth. Some of new search incremental improvement in a number of technical areas, facilities produce discoveries fainter than m(V) = 20.0 mag. such as detector size and sensitivity, computing capacity and (for example, 1.5 m Mt. Lemmon, 1.8 m Spacewatch II) availability of larger telescope apertures. This has resulted in which need a larger telescope for confirmation and early an increase in the NEO discovery rate. There are currently a follow-up. A 1-meter-class telescope is also very suitable for dozen telescopes ranging in size from 0.5 to 1.8 meters confirmation of very fast moving objects and our larger field carrying out full or part time systematic surveying in both of view enables to search for NEO candidates having a larger hemispheres. Several new larger projects are in various stages ephemeris uncertainty. of preparation. An integral part of NEO discovery is rapid early follow- Follow-Up Astrometry of Poorly Observed NEOs up. Extensive follow-up on time scales of weeks and months is usually required for subsequent return recoveries, and may Newly discovered NEOs need astrometric data obtained become critical in ensuring that PHAs and VIs are not lost. over a longer arc during the discovery opposition when they Calculation of precise orbits and determination of impact get fainter. The highest priority has been given to virtual probabilities require enough precise astrometric impactors and PHAs. Special attention is also given to targets measurements covering appropriate orbit arcs. For brighter of future space missions or radar observations. It is necessary objects, many amateur volunteer observers use small or to find and use an optimal observing strategy to maximize moderate-size telescopes all over the world to help orbit improvement of each asteroid along with efficient use of accomplish this task. For fainter objects, just several observing time, because reasonable object selection is a key professional telescopes of 1 m class or larger are used part of the observation planning process. regularly for astrometric follow-up, mainly the JPL Table Mountain 0.6 m, Mt. John 0.64 m, Klet Observatory Recoveries of NEOs at the Second Opposition KLENOT 1.06 m, Spacewatch 1.8 m, and Mt. Lemmon 1.5 m telescopes (Larson 2007). For the determination of reliable orbits it is required to Considering the urgent need for astrometric follow-up of observe asteroids at more than one opposition. If the observed fainter and fast-moving objects, we decided to use resources arc in a discovery apparition is long enough, the chance for a of the Klet Observatory for building a 1-meter-size telescope recovery at the next apparition is good. If the observed arc at for such purposes. This KLENOT telescope was put into a single opposition is not sufficient and the ephemeris of operation in 2002 (Ticha et al. 2002). We report the results selected target is uncertain, then we usually plan to search obtained during six years of regular KLENOT operation as along the line of variation based on data from Minor Planet well as future plans based on technical improvement of the Center databases (Marsden, Williams, Spahr), Lowell KLENOT system and also inspired by the planned next Observatory databases (Bowell, Koehn), and Klet generation surveys. Observatory databases (Tichy, Kocer). For this purpose, a larger field of view is an advantage. KLENOT GOALS Analysis of Cometary Features The KLENOT project is a project of the Klet Observatory Near-Earth and Other Unusual Objects The majority of new ground-based discoveries of comets Observations Team (and Telescope). Our observing strategy comes from large surveys devoted, predominantly, to NEAs. is to concentrate particularly on fainter objects, up to a The first step in distinguishing these newly discovered limiting magnitude of m(V) = 22.0 mag. Reasonable object members of the population of cometary bodies consists of selection is a key part of the observation planning process. confirmatory astrometric observations along with detection Therefore.
Recommended publications
  • Meteorites and Impacts: Research, Cataloguing and Geoethics
    Seminario_10_2013_d 10/6/13 17:12 Página 75 Meteorites and impacts: research, cataloguing and geoethics / Jesús Martínez-Frías Centro de Astrobiología, CSIC-INTA, asociado al NASA Astrobiology Institute, Ctra de Ajalvir, km. 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain Abstract Meteorites are basically fragments from asteroids, moons and planets which travel trough space and crash on earth surface or other planetary body. Meteorites and their impact events are two topics of research which are scientifically linked. Spain does not have a strong scientific tradition of the study of meteorites, unlike many other European countries. This contribution provides a synthetic overview about three crucial aspects related to this subject: research, cataloging and geoethics. At present, there are more than 20,000 meteorite falls, many of them collected after 1969. The Meteoritical Bulletin comprises 39 meteoritic records for Spain. The necessity of con- sidering appropriate protocols, scientific integrity issues and a code of good practice regarding the study of the abiotic world, also including meteorites, is emphasized. Resumen Los meteoritos son, básicamente, fragmentos procedentes de los asteroides, la Luna y Marte que chocan contra la superficie de la Tierra o de otro cuerpo planetario. Su estudio está ligado científicamente a la investigación de sus eventos de impacto. España no cuenta con una fuerte tradición científica sobre estos temas, al menos con el mismo nivel de desarrollo que otros paí- ses europeos. En esta contribución se realiza una revisión sintética de tres aspectos cruciales relacionados con los meteoritos: su investigación, catalogación y geoética. Hasta el momento se han reconocido más de 20.000 caídas meteoríticas, muchas de ellos desde 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Marissa M. Tremblay
    Marissa M. Tremblay Purdue University Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA [email protected] | 765-494-1255 https://www.purdue.edu/science/geochronology/thermochron/ EDUCATION University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley) 2012–2017 Ph.D., Earth and Planetary Science (EPS) Dissertation: Reconstructing past Earth and planetary surface temperatures with cosmogenic noble gases Advisor: David L. Shuster Barnard College of Columbia University 2008–2012 B.A. Environmental Science, summa cum laude Thesis: Late Miocene tilting of the Resting Spring Range, California, with implications for models of crustal extension Advisors: Nicholas Christie-Blick and Sidney R. Hemming PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Assistant Professor, Purdue University 2019–present Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences (EAPS) Newton International Fellow of the Royal Society 2018–2019 Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC) Mentor: Darren Mark University of California President’s Postdoctoral Fellow 2017 University of California, Davis Mentor: Sujoy Mukhopadhyay Research & Teaching Assistant, UC Berkeley 2012–2017 HONORS AND AWARDS Citation for Excellence in Refereeing, American Geophysical Union 2018 Charles & Nancy Naeser Prize, Intl. Standing Committee on Thermochronology 2018 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (declined) 2018 The Royal Society Newton International Fellowship 2017 University of California President’s Postdoctoral Fellowship 2017 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Postdoctoral Fellowship (declined) 2017 Louderback Award, UC Berkeley EPS 2015 National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship 2014 Outstanding Graduate Student Mentor, NERDS program, UC Berkeley 2013 Richards Family Graduate Fellowship, UC Berkeley 2012 Departmental Honors, Barnard College Environmental Science 2012 Distinction, Senior Thesis, Barnard College Environmental Science 2012 Phi Beta Kappa 2011 Barry M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meteoritical Society Newsletter 2001
    SUPPLEMENT TO METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE, VOL. 36, 11 The Meteoritical Society Newsletter (November 2001) A report of the business carried out by the Society over the past year, edited by Edward Scott, Secretary. PRESIDENT'S EDITORIAL Nomenclature President's Editorial Gero Kurat There are some indications that SNC meteorites could originate from Mars, there are others that relate them to carbonaceous Things usually turn out somewhat different from what one expects chondrites. Among the advocates for a martian origin is also the them to be and this was exactly so also with my first few months in foremost expert on these meteorites, Hap McSween. Some colleagues office. I was positively surprised by the amount of activities initiated neglect the possibility that SNC meteorites could not come from Mars by members of our Society. The overwhelmingly constructive and call them "martian meteorites". Others prefer to call them contributions make investing time for the Society a joy. There are, "SNICs", for obvious reasons. Hap has this year been honored for however, also some unsolved problems which do not create instant his work on "martian meteorites". As the possibility for a non-martian joy but whose solution eventually could lead to improvements origin of SNC meteorites still exists, a curious conundrum emerges: beneficial for all of us. So joy is awaiting us afterwards. Us means how could Hap have done this wonderful work on something that the Council and in particular the Secretary of the Society who does possibly does not exist? Please help us to solve that riddle—the best an excellent job in spite of the bumpy communication between our three solutions will receive prizes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meteoritical Society Committee on Meteorite Nomenclature
    THE METEORITICAL SOCIETY COMMITTEE ON METEORITE NOMENCLATURE GUIDELINES FOR METEORITE NOMENCLATURE FEBRUARY 1980 Revised October 2000; October 2004; April 2005; October 2006; July 2010; March 2011; December 2011; May 2012; July 2012; August 2012; February 2015; July 2015; March 2019 [Addition of §4.2c] Contents GUIDELINES FOR METEORITE NOMENCLATURE ............................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Objectives. ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Scope. ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. APPLICATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF A METEORITE NAME ............................... 3 2.1 Unique names. ................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Distinctive names. ............................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Precedents. ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 International usage............................................................................................................. 4 3. NEW METEORITE NAMES ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Meteorite Source Regions in the Solar System
    Icarus 311 (2018) 271–287 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Identification of meteorite source regions in the Solar System ∗ Mikael Granvik a,b, , Peter Brown c,d a Department of Physics, P.O. Box 64, 0 0 014 University of Helsinki, Finland b Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Kiruna, Box 848, S-98128, Sweden c Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London N6A 3K7, Canada d Centre for Planetary Science and Exploration, University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5B7, Canada a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Over the past decade there has been a large increase in the number of automated camera networks that Received 27 January 2018 monitor the sky for fireballs. One of the goals of these networks is to provide the necessary information Revised 6 April 2018 for linking meteorites to their pre-impact, heliocentric orbits and ultimately to their source regions in the Accepted 13 April 2018 solar system. We re-compute heliocentric orbits for the 25 meteorite falls published to date from original Available online 14 April 2018 data sources. Using these orbits, we constrain their most likely escape routes from the main asteroid belt Keywords: and the cometary region by utilizing a state-of-the-art orbit model of the near-Earth-object population, Meteorites which includes a size-dependence in delivery efficiency. While we find that our general results for escape Meteors routes are comparable to previous work, the role of trajectory measurement uncertainty in escape-route Asteroids identification is explored for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies Final Report
    PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies Final Report Committee to Review Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies Space Studies Board Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study is based on work supported by the Contract NNH06CE15B between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Copies of this report are available free of charge from: Space Studies Board National Research Council 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meteoritical Society Newsletter
    The Meteoritical Society Newsletter November, 2000 A report of Society activities during the past year compiled by Ed Scott, Secretary Sections: President's address New Council Meteoritics & Planetary Science Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Society Awards and Honors Planetary Sciences Best Student Paper Award Annual Meetings Finances Other committees and activities Constitutional changes PRESIDENT'S EDITORIAL Michael J. Drake It's been another great year for the Meteoritical Society! Mini Wadhwa, Andy Davis, and colleagues did a wonderful job of organizing and running the Chicago meeting and associated functions. Chicago was revealed as a vibrant, elegant city. As always, there are special people and families who provide generous help to the Society. The Barringer family has continued its support of graduate student travel, the Barringer Medal, and the Barringer lecture, which was given by Torrence Johnson. The Society is extremely grateful for this generous support. Speaking of medals, this year's medallists were Guenter Lugmair (Leonard Medal), Ralph Baldwin (Barringer Medal), and Meenakshi Wadhwa (Nier Prize - and chocolate medallions!) Congratulations to Guenter, Ralph, and Mini! In Rome, the awardees will be Harry McSween (Leonard Medal), Sasha Basilevsky (Barringer Medal), and Larry Nittler (Nier Prize), again well-deserved recipients of our prestigious awards. There will be further changes in Officers of the Society. It is my great pleasure to announce that Gero Kurat assumes the office of President, Gary Huss Vice President, and Tim Swindle Treasurer of the Meteoritical Society. David Kring has graciously agreed to serve as Deputy Treasurer. As you are aware, this year was the first since the 1970s that we had a contested Presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • Milley 2010.Pdf (10.17Mb)
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Legacy Theses 2010 Physical Properties of Fireball-Producing Earth-Impacting Meteoroids and Orbit Determination through Shadow Calibration of the Buzzard Coulee Meteorite Fall Milley, Ellen Palesa Milley, E. P. (2010). Physical Properties of Fireball-Producing Earth-Impacting Meteoroids and Orbit Determination through Shadow Calibration of the Buzzard Coulee Meteorite Fall (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/17766 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/47937 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Physical Properties of Fireball-Producing Earth-Impacting Meteoroids and Orbit Determination through Shadow Calibration of the Buzzard Coulee Meteorite Fall by Ellen Palesa Milley A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCE CALGARY, ALBERTA April, 2010 ©c Ellen Palesa Milley 2010 The author of this thesis has granted the University of Calgary a non-exclusive license to reproduce and distribute copies of this thesis to users of the University of Calgary Archives. Copyright remains with the author. Theses and dissertations available in the University of Calgary Institutional Repository are solely for the purpose of private study and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Element Chemistry of Cumulus Ridge 04071 Pallasite with Implications for Main Group Pallasites
    Trace element chemistry of Cumulus Ridge 04071 pallasite with implications for main group pallasites Item Type Article; text Authors Danielson, L. R.; Righter, K.; Humayun, M. Citation Danielson, L. R., Righter, K., & Humayun, M. (2009). Trace element chemistry of Cumulus Ridge 04071 pallasite with implications for main group pallasites. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 44(7), 1019-1032. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb00785.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 23/09/2021 14:17:54 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/656592 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 44, Nr 7, 1019–1032 (2009) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Trace element chemistry of Cumulus Ridge 04071 pallasite with implications for main group pallasites Lisa R. DANIELSON1*, Kevin RIGHTER2, and Munir HUMAYUN3 1Mailcode JE23, NASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, Texas 77058, USA 2Mailcode KT, NASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, Texas 77058, USA 3National High Magnetic Field Laboratory and Department of Geological Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 06 November 2008; revision accepted 11 May 2009) Abstract–Pallasites have long been thought to represent samples from the metallic core–silicate mantle boundary of a small asteroid-sized body, with as many as ten different parent bodies recognized recently. This report focuses on the description, classification, and petrogenetic history of pallasite Cumulus Ridge (CMS) 04071 using electron microscopy and laser ablation ICP-MS.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Version of Record (PDF / 6MB)
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs An Isotopic Investigation Of Early Planetesimal Differentiation Processes Thesis How to cite: Windmill, Richard Joseph (2021). An Isotopic Investigation Of Early Planetesimal Differentiation Processes. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2020 Richard Joseph Windmill https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.00012472 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk AN ISOTOPIC INVESTIGATION OF EARLY PLANETESIMAL DIFFERENTIATION PROCESSES Richard J. Windmill Supervisors: Dr. I. A. Franchi Professor M. Anand Dr. R. C. Greenwood Submitted to the School of Physical Sciences at The Open University in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2020 School of Physical Sciences Robert Hooke Building The Open University Walton Hall Milton Keynes MK7 6AA United Kingdom Abstract The differentiation and early evolution of planetesimals is relatively poorly understood. The Main- Group pallasites (PMGs) and IIIAB irons are differentiated meteorite groups from deep planetesimal interiors. They provide a window into the early evolution of rocky planets because of the abundance of samples from these groups and because a common planetary provenance has been proposed. Oxygen isotope analyses are crucial in understanding these relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • PSRD: Meteorite Collection in Moscow, Russia
    PSRD: Meteorite collection in Moscow, Russia October 31, 2018 Better Know A Meteorite Collection: Fersman Mineralogical Museum in Moscow, Russia Written by Linda M. V. Martel Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology PSRD highlights places and people around the world who play central roles in caring for and analyzing meteorites. Join us as we visit the meteorite collection at the Fersman Mineralogical Museum in Moscow and talk with the people who help make history and discoveries come alive. Next to one of Moscow's oldest gardens (the Neskuchny, which aptly translates to "not boring" garden) stands the similarly fascinating Fersman Mineralogical Museum that celebrated its 300th anniversary in 2016. Among the museum's gem and mineral treasures is a collection of meteorites of historical significance, including Pallas' Iron found in 1749 in Siberia, also known as the Krasnojarsk pallasite, pictured above [Data link from the Meteoritical Bulletin]. PSRD had the golden opportunity to visit the Fersman Mineralogical Museum in July 2018, along with other attendees of the 81st Meteoritical Society meeting, in the company of Dr. Mikhail Generalov, Collection Chief Curator, pictured below standing next to a large sample of the Seymchan meteorite [Data link from Meteoritical Bulletin]. In this article we highlight a selection of the extraordinary pieces in this meteorite collection. http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Oct18/Meteorites.Moscow.Museum.html PSRD: Meteorite collection in Moscow, Russia Dr. Mikhail Generalov stands next to a large sample of the Seymchan meteorite. http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Oct18/Meteorites.Moscow.Museum.html PSRD: Meteorite collection in Moscow, Russia A closer view of the cut, polished, and etched surface of the Seymchan meteorite showing the large schreibersite mineral grains (darker areas) and Widmanstätten pattern in the iron-nickel metal.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorite Falls and the Fragmentation of Meteorites Daniel Momeni, Westmont High School, Campbell, CA 95008
    Meteorite Falls and the Fragmentation of Meteorites Daniel Momeni Westmont High School, Campbell, CA 95008 In order to understand the fragmentation of objects entering the atmosphere and why some produce more fragments than others, I have searched the Meteoritical Society database for meteorites >20 kg that fell in the USA, China, and India. I also studied the video and film records of 21 fireballs that produced meteorites. A spreadsheet was prepared that noted smell, fireball, explosion, whistling, rumbling, the number of fragments, light, and impact sounds. Falls with large numbers of fragments were examined to look for common traits. These were: The Norton County aubrite, explosion and a flare >100 fragments The Forest City H5 chondrite explosion, a flare, a dust trail 505 specimens. The Richardton H5 chondrite explosion and light 71 specimens. The Juancheng H5 chondrite explosion, a rumbling, a flare, 1000 specimens. a dust trail The Tagish Lake C2 chondrite explosion, flare, dust trail 500 specimens. I conclude that fragmentation is governed by the following: (1) Bigger meteors undergo more stress which results in more specimens; (2) Harder meteorites also require more force to break them up which will cause greater fragmentation; (3) Force and pressure are directly proportional during falls. General observations made were; (1) Meteorites produce fireballs sooner due to high friction; (2) Meteors tend to explode as well because of high stress; (3) Softer meteorites tend to cause dust trails; (4) Some falls produce light as they fall at high velocity. I am grateful to NASA Ames for this opportunity and Derek Sears, Katie Bryson, and Dan Ostrowski for discussions.
    [Show full text]