DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of Cutting - the Birth of Cinema and Continuity Editing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of Cutting - the Birth of Cinema and Continuity Editing The History of Cutting - The Birth of Cinema and Continuity Editing Primitive Cinema Which pioneer of early cinema “accidentally” discovered the jump cut? _______________________________ He is also responsible for 3 other editing techniques: A tableau is a scene shot from the ______________________ angle. Beyond the Tableau: The Birth of the Edit Edwin S. Porter took ________________ footage and mixed it with staged scenes to create a narrative. Temporal Overlapse is: _________________________________________________________ In The Great Train Robbery, Porter was able to cut between scenes without fades or dissolves, but most importantly without letting the scene reach it’s __________________________ end. Editing has the ability to compress _____________________ in favor of impact over reality. The basic unit of film is the ____________________________. D.W. Griffith and Continuity Editing Griffith made ____________ films for Biograph between 1908-1911 He helped push cinema past the tableau mentality to the __________________ shot medium we know today. One of Griffith’s first inventions was the ____________________, used in the Greaser’s Gauntlet. Continuity Editing: _______________________________________________________________________ 180 Degree rule implies that you keep the camera on one side of ___________________________________ Intercutting / Cross-cutting: ________________________________________________________________ Griffith’s film The Birth of a Nation is considered the first ________________________________. Which of Griffith’s film was the influence on Soviet filmmakers to come up with Montage Theory? ___________________________________________________ The History of Cutting - The Soviet Theory of Montage The Birth of Soviet Cinema The Moscow Film School was founded in _________________ and became the world’s first film school. The news reels made here were for: _______________________ & _________________________________ Lev Kuleshov brought new insight into the _______________________________ workings of motion pictures. The Kuleshov Workshop His study group or workshop attracted ______________________ film students. They de-constructed the film _____________________________ to see the impact of different edits. The Kuleshov Effect: shots are exactly the _______________, but audiences read ___________________ in the actor’s face… ….it’s the same three shots, but the ___________________ changes the _____________________________. Kuleshov was proving that film can transcend _____________________ & ______________________ What does the word “montage” mean? _________________________________________________________ Sergei Eisenstein and the Theory of Montage What contribution did Eisenstein make as a pioneer of early editing? ______________________________________________________________________________ His film ___________________________________ would be his most influential film, even though it was pure _____________________________________ 5 Methods of Montage (from simplest to most complex) 1. _________________________________: cutting to the beat 2. _________________________________: concerned with the action in the shot 3. _________________________________: concerned with the tone of the shot 4. _________________________________: concerning how whole sequences play against each other 5. _________________________________: creating abstract ideas by relationships of intellectual concepts Editing is pushed even more with montage in the 1950s by the ____________________________ and Hollywood visionaries, like Alfred Hitchcock. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aural Expressionism and Montage in Hitchcock's Blackmail
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Summer 6-25-2012 There’s Something British about That: Aural Expressionism and Montage in Hitchcock’s Blackmail, Psycho, and The irB ds Laura D. Borger [email protected], [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp Recommended Citation Borger, Laura D., "There’s Something British about That: Aural Expressionism and Montage in Hitchcock’s Blackmail, Psycho, and The Birds" (2012). Research Papers. Paper 260. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/260 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THERE’S SOMETHING BRITISH ABOUT THAT: AURAL EXPRESSIONISM AND MONTAGE IN HITCHCOCK’S BLACKMAIL, PSYCHO, AND THE BIRDS by Laura Borger B.A., Southern Illinois University, 1998 B.S., Southern Illinois University, 1998 M.S., Southern Illinois University, 2003 A Research Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Department of English in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale August 2012 Copyright by Laura Borger, 2012 All Rights Reserved RESEARCH REPORT APPROVAL THERE’S SOMETHING BRITISH ABOUT THAT: AURAL EXPRESSIONISM AND MONTAGE IN HITCHCOCK’S BLACKMAIL, PSYCHO, AND THE BIRDS By Laura Borger A Research Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the field of English Approved by: Scott McEathron, PhD, Chair Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale June 25, 2012 AN ABSTRACT OF THE RESEARCH REPORT OF LAURA BORGER, for the MASTER OF ARTS degree in ENGLISH, presented on June 25, 2012, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
    [Show full text]
  • COM 320, History of the Moving Image–The Origins of Editing Styles And
    COM 320, History of Film–The Origins of Editing Styles and Techniques I. The Beginnings of Classical/Hollywood Editing (“Invisible Editing”) 1. The invisible cut…Action is continuous and fluid across cuts 2. Intercutting (between 2+ different spaces; also called parallel editing or crosscutting) -e.g., lack of intercutting?: The Life of An American Fireman (1903) -e.g., D. W. Griffith’s Broken Blossoms (1919) (boxing match vs. girl/Chinese man encounter) 3. Analytical editing -Breaks a single space into separate framings, after establishing shot 4. Continguity editing…Movement from space to space -e.g., Rescued by Rover (1905) 5. Specific techniques 1. Cut on action 2, Match cut (vs. orientation cut?) 3. 180-degree system (violated in Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)) 4. Point of view (POV) 5. Eyeline match (depending on Kuleshov Effect, actually) 6. Shot/reverse shot II. Soviet Montage Editing (“In-Your-Face Editing”) 1. Many shots 2. Rapid cutting—like Abel Gance 3. Thematic montage 4. Creative geography -Later example—Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds 5. Kuleshov Effect -Established (??) by Lev Kuleshov in a series of experiments (poorly documented, however) -Nature of the “Kuleshov Effect”—Even without establishing shot, the viewer may infer spatial or temporal continuity from shots of separate elements; his supposed early “test” used essentially an eyeline match: -e.g., man + bowl of soup = hunger man + woman in coffin = sorrow man + little girl with teddy bear = love 6. Intercutting—expanded use from Griffith 7. Contradictory space -Shots of same event contradict one another (e.g., plate smashing in Potemkin) 8. Graphic contrasts -Distinct change in composition or action (e.g., Odessa step sequence in Potemkin) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Idea Behind Editing in Narrative Film Is the Coordination of One Shot with Another in Order to Create a Coherent, Artistically Pleasing, Meaningful Whole
    Chapter 4: Editing Film 125: The Textbook © Lynne Lerych The general idea behind editing in narrative film is the coordination of one shot with another in order to create a coherent, artistically pleasing, meaningful whole. The system of editing employed in narrative film is called continuity editing – its purpose is to create and provide efficient, functional transitions. Sounds simple enough, right?1 Yeah, no. It’s not really that simple. These three desired qualities of narrative film editing – coherence, artistry, and meaning – are not easy to achieve, especially when you consider what the film editor begins with. The typical shooting phase of a typical two-hour narrative feature film lasts about eight weeks. During that time, the cinematography team may record anywhere from 20 or 30 hours of film on the relatively low end – up to the 240 hours of film that James Cameron and his cinematographer, Russell Carpenter, shot for Titanic – which eventually weighed in at 3 hours and 14 minutes by the time it reached theatres. Most filmmakers will shoot somewhere in between these extremes. No matter how you look at it, though, the editor knows from the outset that in all likelihood less than ten percent of the film shot will make its way into the final product. As if the sheer weight of the available footage weren’t enough, there is the reality that most scenes in feature films are shot out of sequence – in other words, they are typically shot in neither the chronological order of the story nor the temporal order of the film.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSCRIPT Editing, Graphics and B Roll, Oh
    TRANSCRIPT Editing, Graphics and B Roll, Oh My! You’ve entered the deep dark tunnel of creating a new thing…you can’t see the light of day… Some of my colleagues can tell you that I am NOT pleasant to be around when I am in the creative video-making tunnel and I feel like none of the footage I have is working the way I want it to, and I can’t seem to fix even the tiniest thing, and I’m convinced all of my work is garbage and it’s never going to work out right and… WOW. Okay deep breaths. I think it’s time to step away from the expensive equipment and go have a piece of cake…I’ll be back… Editing, for me at least, is the hardest, but also most creatively fulfilling part of the video-making process. I have such a love/hate relationship with editing because its where I start to see all the things I messed up in the planning and filming process. But it’s ALSO where - when I let it - my creativity pulls me in directions that are BETTER than I planned. Most of my best videos were okay/mediocre in the planning and filming stages, but became something special during the editing process. So, how the heck do you do it? There are lots of ways to edit, many different styles, formats and techniques you can learn. But for me at least, it comes down to being playful and open to the creative process. This is the time to release your curious and playful inner child.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheat Sheet Video Editing
    The Ultimate Video Editing Cheat Sheet /SunnyLenarduzzi Video & Social Media Coach, Consultant, YouTuber, Speaker and Broadcaster. Step 1: Pre-Production Did you know that the editing process begins before you even turn on your camera? Consider the following pre-production elements: Script Write a loose script that you'll use to guide you and the flow of your video. Break the script into sections i.e. intro, point #1, point #2, outro. If you promote your video across social platforms, write scripts that are specific to: Instagram: 15 sec. maximum Twitter: 30 sec. maximum Facebook: 20 min. maximum www.SunnyLenarduzzi.com Pre-Production Titles & Graphics To add a unique look and feel to your videos, be sure to create your intro graphic or animation that you can use in all of your videos moving forward. You can easily make these yourself in Canva or PicMonkey. Or you can hire someone to do it for as low as $5.00 on Fiverr. Shot List For each portion of your script, think about the visuals you'll need to support your points i.e. photos, extra video footage (b-roll), props, interviews, etc. Collect those creative elements and store them in a folder so they're organized for when it comes time to edit your video. Group shots with the same locations together to make the filming process easier; it's ok to film your video out of order. www.SunnyLenarduzzi.com Step 2: Production Lights, camera, action! Now that you have your ducks in a row, it's time to shoot your masterpiece.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash-Forward: the Future Is Now 2016
    Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Patricia Pisters Flash-Forward: The Future is Now 2016 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13486 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Sammelbandbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Pisters, Patricia: Flash-Forward: The Future is Now. In: Shane Denson, Julia Leyda (Hg.): Post-Cinema. Theorizing 21st- Century Film. Falmer: REFRAME Books 2016, S. 145–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13486. Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0/ Attribution - Non Commercial - No Derivatives 4.0/ License. For Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz more information see: finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 2.3 Flash-Forward: The Future is Now BY PATRICIA PISTERS 1. The Death of the Image is Behind Us Starting with the observation that “a certain idea of fate and a certain idea of the image are tied up in the apocalyptic discourse of today’s cultural climate,” Jacques Rancière investigates the possibilities of “imageness,” or the future of the image that can be an alternative to the often-heard complaint in contemporary culture that there is nothing but images, and that therefore images are devoid of content or meaning (1). This discourse is particularly strong in discussions on the fate of cinema in the digital age, where it is commonly argued that the cinematographic image has died either because image culture has become saturated with interactive images, as Peter Greenaway argues on countless occasions, or because the digital has undermined the ontological photographic power of the image but that film has a virtual afterlife as either information or art (Rodowick 143).
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Film & TV
    DiGiTal Film & TV Exam REVIEW GUIDE: Film Technologies & Cinematic Techniques Types of Questions 1. Short Answer-- Qualify your answers with illustrative examples which are drawn directly from the readings, shots, and film clips 2. Shot Composition and SEMIOTICS applied concepts, montage/sequence analysis (visual, audio, dialogue, editing tactics) 3. Application of Reading/Theory Questions Application of ideas from readings and screenings. Reading theory/concept to actual practice and examples 4. Film Development, Scripting, Conceptualization and PlanningKnowledge of the “behind the scenes” development and conceptual structure of filmmaking 5. SCREENINGS: Critical analysis of in and out of class screenings and semiotic moments 6. Strong and detailed working knowlegdge of Canon D70 cameras (the 18-135mm lens and tripod) – menus, options, settings, lens features, audio, etc. 7. Strong and detailed working knowledge of Premiere Pro CC— This includes Editing, Titling, Key Frames, working with hiRes stills, basic effects, Audio, Transitions, Exporting (Premiere—step-by-step sequence/approaches) 8. Working knowledge of Camtasia Studio 9. Working knowledge of Digital Memory Resources: This includes SD Cards, Portable/external hard drives, and Network (TLDAT) resources 10. Black Box ScreeningQuestion You’ll want to review: 1. Readings, terminology, class notes, course links, Premiere operations, screenings! DigiFilm&TV COURSE LINKS Page 2. Be able to CONVINCINGLY "deconstruct" the semiotics of film/TV stills and sequences using variety of terms
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Photography in Filmmaking Illustrations
    Elements of Photography in Filmmaking from Gilbert H. Muller and John A. Williams, Ways In: Approaches to Reading and Writing about Literature and Film (New York: McGraw Hill, 2003) Just as words make up the diction of literature, shots are the diction of filmmaking. Shots are defined as the images that are recorded continuously from the moment a camera is turned on to the time it is turned off. Describing shots involves the concepts of framing and image size. As in photography, all the information in a shot is contained within the frame. The size of the most important image in a frame (often the human figure) is an element that creates the difference between shots. The noted film authority Louis Gianetti defines them in six basic categories: the extreme long shot, the long shot, the full shot, the medium shot, the close-up, and the extreme close-up. The extreme long shot, often called the establishing shot, shows a whole environment of a scene from a distance. Typical examples include a whole building, a street, or a large part of a forest. The long shot presents a character in an important physical context. A typical long shot will show a man in a room, for example, where the shot is wide enough to show the details of the room in relationship to the human subject. The full shot displays exactly what it implies: the full human figure from head to toe. The medium shot reveals the figure from the waist up. The close-up concentrates on the human face or a small object (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Documentary: Data: Montage’ Jon Dovey & Mandy Rose
    1 ‘We’re Happy and We Know It : Documentary: Data: Montage’ Jon Dovey & Mandy Rose Abstract This article is concerned with the social praxis of documentary in the sea of ‘ubiquitous data’ that is both consequence and driver of online social mediation. The topic is given importance by the morphing of the character of video in the context of the latest web coding language, HTML5. Until now web video has been impervious to its networked context; reproducing the conditions of the TV screen in a hypermediated space. Now existing databases and live information drawn from social media can be connected to the documentary environment, offering opportunities for the production of new kinds of knowledge and application. The affordances of networked connectivity offer the potential to re-contextualise documentary material through mobilising the enormous co-creative potential of human discourse captured in the web. The challenge in these marriages of mass media form and rhizomatic network is to find new ways of shaping attention into a coherent experience. To do so we have to re-invent the social praxis of documentary, creating new visual and informational grammars. Contributor’s Details Jon Dovey is Professor of Screen Media at the University of the West of England. He is the Director of the Digital Cultures Research Centre (http://www.dcrc.org.uk/). He also heads up REACT, the AHRC Creative Economy Hub for Wales and the West that aims to connect arts research with the Creative Economy. He was a film maker and video artist before becoming an academic. He has been working with Mandy Rose and the iDocs team at DCRC, see more at http://i-docs.org/ .
    [Show full text]
  • Trespassing Hollywood: Property, Space, and the “Appropriation Film”
    An unauthorized partial recording of Christian Marclay’s The Clock as accessed on Vimeo, May 21, 2015 . Trespassing Hollywood: Property, Space, and the “Appropriation Film” RICHARD MISEk In the two decades since the first exhibition of Douglas Gordon’s 24 Hour Psycho (1993), “appropriation”—a mainstay of visual art since the mid-twentieth century—has become a common feature of experimental filmmaking and artists’ film and video. Many of the most prominent contemporary practitioners in these fields (including Cory Arcangel, Mark Leckey, Christian Marclay, and Nicolas Provost) have made their names by creating montages, collages, mash-ups, and other transformative works from preexisting moving images. Perhaps the clearest evidence so far of appropriation’s prominence within moving-image arts was the 2012 Turner Prize, in which the works of two of the four finalists (Luke Fowler and Elizabeth Price, who won) were videos constructed mainly from archival televi - sion footage. Of course, this artistic turn is symptomatic of a broader cultural turn that has seen media reuse spread to everyday practice. However artists’ audiovisual appropriations may differ from fan-made YouTube supercuts, the two share a cru - cial technological precondition: the ability to copy and transform source files with - out a significant reduction in quality. 1 Applied to video, Nicolas Bourriaud’s char - acterization of contemporary artistic practice as “postproduction” loops back to its original meaning. It describes not only the creative process of “selecting cultural objects and inserting them into new contexts” but also the technologies through which this process takes place: video-editing, sound-mixing, and visual-effects (i.e., “postproduction”) software.
    [Show full text]
  • Kubrick's Match Cut in 2001
    Kubrick’s Match Cut in 2001: A Space Odyssey Stanley Kubrick’s renowned film, 2001: A Space Odyssey, is one of peculiar filmmaking and storytelling strategies. From the farfetched implications of the technological advancements of the future from a 1968 perspective to the use of odd motifs throughout the film, Kubrick’s film gives audiences something to think about throughout and after watching. One of the most significant scenes of the entire movie is the use of a match cut between the shot of a primate with a bone and an unknown spacecraft floating through outer space. A “match cut” can be defined as two shots edited consecutively which both possess a similar visual structure; the objects in a match cut are to be in the same place in each frame and have the same type of focus structure, as to not break the continuity of a plot and ultimately create a greater meaning of the story. In the case of 2001: A Space Odyssey, a bone is matched in the same vertically flying pattern as a spaceship in the second shot. In the former shot, the bone is propelled into the air after the primate who was holding it found new uses for it; as it is thrown in the air, it is put into a slow motion single shot, as to imply something for the audience to figure out. In the latter shot, the spaceship is in the same diagonal alignment as the bone in the previous shot and has the same type of shape. This match cut provided an array of arguments between filmmakers and historians alike regarding the implications of the shot’s meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Choices in the Editing Room
    Choices in the Editing Room: How the Intentional Editing of Dialogue Scenes through Shot Choice can Enhance Story and Character Development within Motion Pictures Presented to the Faculty of Liberty University School of Communication & Creative Arts In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts in Strategic Communication By Jonathan Pfenninger December 2014 Pfenninger ii Thesis Committee Carey Martin, Ph.D., Chair Date Stewart Schwartz, Ph.D. Date Van Flesher, MFA Date Pfenninger iii Copyright © 2014 Jonathan Ryan Pfenninger All Rights Reserved Pfenninger iv Dedication: To Momma and Daddy: The drive, passion, and love that you have instilled in me has allowed me to reach farther than I thought I would ever be able to. Pfenninger v Acknowledgements I would like to thank my parents, Arlen and Kelly Pfenninger, for their love and support throughout this journey. As you have watched me grow up there have been times when I have questioned whether I was going to make it through but you both have always stood strong and supported me. Your motivation has helped me know that I can chase my dreams and not settle for mediocrity. I love you. Andrew Travers, I never dreamed of a passion in filmmaking and storytelling before really getting to know you. Thank you for the inspiration and motivation. Dr. Martin, your example as a professor and filmmaker have inspired me over the last three years. I have gained an incredible amount of knowledge and confidence under your teaching and guidance. I cannot thank you enough for the time you have invested in me and this work.
    [Show full text]