Appendix-Management Plan for the 4-0 Ranch Unit of the Chief

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix-Management Plan for the 4-0 Ranch Unit of the Chief July 2019 Management Plan for the 4-0 Ranch Unit of the Chief Joseph Wildlife Area Appendix of the Blue Mountains Wildlife Areas Management Plan (2019) The mission of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife is to preserve, protect and perpetuate fish, wildlife and ecosystems while providing sustainable fish and wildlife recreational and commercial opportunities. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 1111 Washington Street, SE Olympia, WA 98501 Table of Contents Plan Purpose and Use ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Property Description ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Species Management & Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 8 Management Action Timeline ............................................................................................................................... 28 References ............................................................................................................................................................. 29 Appendix A: Parcel Table with Tax Lots and Parcel Maps .................................................................................... 30 Appendix B: Species to Benefit ............................................................................................................................. 34 Appendix C: Rare Plants ....................................................................................................................................... 37 Appendix D: Grazing Management ....................................................................................................................... 38 Photo cover by Justin Haug, WDFW Photo this page by Alan L. Bauer 1 Plan Purpose and Use This Management Plan was developed for the properties on the 4-0 Ranch Unit of the Chief Joseph Wildlife Area (Figures 1 and 2), acquired in fee title (from 2014 on) with financial support from the federal Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund’s Habitat Conservation Land Acquisition grants. Accordingly, these properties, listed in Table 1, are to be managed in perpetuity for the benefit of the federally listed bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), Snake River steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and Snake River fall Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), as well as other state species and other target species. This Management Plan is in effect from July 2, 2019 until it is updated, replaced, or supplemented by documents approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). WDFW will undertake management activities herein as funding and staffing allow. If any management activities on the property result in generating revenue, the revenue will only be used for management of the property in keeping with the grant purpose. The 4-0 Ranch Unit of the Chief Joseph Wildlife Area (part of the Blue Mountains complex) was purchased in five phases, from 2012 – 2016, with Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund’s Habitat Conservation Land Acquisition (CESCF) grants and Recreation Conservation Office (RCO) – Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) funding. This plan covers lands purchased in phases 4 and 5 (see Table 1 for properties purchased from 2014 on). It is included as an appendix to the Draft Blue Mountains Wildlife Areas Management Plan (expected to be completed in spring 2019). The 4-0 Ranch Unit is 10,451 acres, in two management sections, Grouse Creek, west of Wenatchee Creek, and Mountain View, east of Wenatchee Creek. This plan covers the western portion of the property, Grouse Creek, which is 4,069 acres. Management activities conducted on the Grouse Flats will also apply to and benefit the whole 4-0 Ranch Unit, as well as other properties in the Blue Mountains Wildlife Areas. This acquisition addresses two recovery objectives for bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), from the Snake River Salmon Recovery Board (2004, 2011): 1) Protect, restore, and maintain suitable habitat conditions for bull trout, and 2) Use all available conservation programs and regulations to protect and conserve bull trout and bull trout habitats. The entire project area supported by CESCF funds includes both Grouse Creek and Mountain View, and will protect approximately 15 miles of river and creek habitat for at least nine aquatic species covered by the Washington Forest Practices Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) including federally listed bull trout (see Figure 3). In the 10-year Draft Management Plan for the Blue Mountains Wildlife Areas, the overall vision of the Chief Joseph Wildlife Area, where the project is located, is “To protect native range and forest habitats, cultural resources, and big game winter range, while offering excellent hunting opportunities and world-class fisheries on the Snake and Grande Ronde Rivers.” The overall management objective of the 4-0 Ranch Unit is the conservation of a diversity of high quality habitat types, state and federally classified fish and wildlife species, and numerous plant species. 2 Property Description The Blue Mountains Wildlife Areas is made up of three wildlife areas: Asotin Creek, Chief Joseph, and W.T. Wooten, and cover 77,177 acres in Asotin, Garfield, Columbia, and Walla Walla counties of SE Washington (Figure 1). The 4-0 Ranch unit is part of the Chief Joseph Wildlife Area, in the Snake River and Grand Ronde River watersheds. The 4-0 Ranch unit is located about 30 miles southwest of Clarkston (Figure 2). Primary access to the unit is from Highway 129, to the Grande Ronde Road, to Grouse Creek Road. The unit is bordered by the Umatilla National Forest, US Bureau of Land Management, and private property. The creek that runs through the property appears as Wenatchee and Menatchee on different maps. In this plan it will be referred to as Wenatchee, the name on the legal documents and the locally used name. Elevations on the 4-0 Ranch Unit range from about 1,400 feet to 3,500 feet. Close to the Grande Ronde River, narrow canyons and steeps slopes are common. Above the major drainage breaks, broad ridges and gentle benches tend to prevail. The dominant drainage pattern is to the southwest toward the Grande Ronde River. Many relatively level areas have been under recent cultivation and or harvest. Average annual precipitation is approximately 19-21 inches. At the time of acquisition, WDFW’s interest in acquiring this property was due to its relatively ecologically intact and diverse landscape that will protect habitats and species, as well as connecting large blocks of public land. The unit includes ten miles of river and creek habitat, with parts of the Wenatchee, Cougar, Grouse, and Medicine Creek drainages, tributaries, and shorelines of the Grande Ronde River, a tributary of the Snake River. Various National Ecological Systems are present, with the Columbia Foothill and Dry Canyon Grassland and Northern Rocky Mountain Ponderosa Pine and Woodland Savanna predominating (see Figure 4). There have not been any significant recent fires on the 4-0 Ranch Unit. However, before fire suppression efforts began in the 1900’s, the forest and grasslands are thought to have burned every 16-40 years historically. Due to fuels accumulation over the last 100 years, changing vegetation conditions, and fire suppression, the surrounding areas have more recently experienced large, often stand-replacing wildfires such as the Grizzly Bear Complex fire of 2015 which burned over 82,000 acres and came within a few miles of the 4-0 Ranch Wildlife Area. Tribal Treaty Rights The Blue Mountains Wildlife Areas are in part of the aboriginal range of the Nez Perce, Walla Walla, Cayuse, Umatilla, and Palouse Tribes. The Nez Perce Tribe and Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation have treaty harvest rights within the subbasin. The tribes have retained the right to take fish at all “usual and accustomed” places, and to hunt, gather, and pasture livestock on open and unclaimed land. The Treaty of Walla Walla (June 9, 1855) and the Treaty with the Nez Perces (June 11, 1855), both signed at Camp Stevens, Walla Walla Valley, include language about these rights. Treaty tribes have been recognized as managers of their treaty-reserved resources, and have interest in the management decisions in the Blue Mountains Wildlife Area (US. v Washington 1974). WDFW honors and respects Tribal treaty reserved rights, and will take into consideration traditional 3 hunting and gathering sites in any actions in this plan that may affect them. Communicating and coordinating with tribes is an objective of the Blue Mountains Wildlife Areas Management Plan. Land Use Prior to the WDFW acquisition, the 4-0 Ranch was a well-managed working ranch, with agricultural fields and cattle grazing. The former town of Mountain View, which currently lies on the 4-0 Ranch Unit, had a post office until 1951 and a school until 1954 before purchase by a private ranching company. Part of the purchase agreement with WDFW allowed the seller to continue agricultural and grazing practices, but the seller ceased operations in 2017. In 2018, an agreement was reached with two new operators to graze cattle and grow crops in a similar fashion. Grazing is regulated under the terms of the management plan,
Recommended publications
  • Grizzly Bear Scientific Name: Ursus Arctos Species Code: M-URAR Status
    Grizzly Bear Scientific Name: Ursus arctos Species Code: M-URAR Status: Blue-listed Distribution • Provincial Range Grizzly bears are distributed throughout most of the mainland of the province. They are absent from Vancouver Island, the Queen Charlotte Islands and outer coastal islands. They occur in all biogeoclimatic zones in the province, except the Coastal Douglas Fir zone (CDF). They utilize a wide variety of habitats ranging from coastal estuaries to alpine meadows. • Elevational Range: Sea-Level to Alpine • Provincial Context Grizzly bears are most abundant in the coastal ecosystems and in areas in the southern Rocky Mountains (Flathead area and Glacier National Park). The current population estimate for grizzly bears in British Columbia is approximately 13,000 (Fuhr and Demarchi 1990). • Range in Project Area: Ecoprovince: Southern Interior Mountains Ecoregions: Columbia Mountains and Highlands, Southern Rocky Mountain Trench, Western Continental Ranges Ecosections: Eastern Purcell Mountains, East Kootenay Trench, Southern Park Ranges Biogeoclimatic Zones: IDFdm2; MSdk; ESSFdk, ESSFdku; ESSFdkp; ESSFwm; AT Ecology and Key Habitat Requirements Habitat use by grizzly bears is influenced primarily by food availability, the presence of suitable resting, denning and mating sites, the presence of other bears and by human development. They are very adaptable and inhabit a wide variety of habitat types from coastal coniferous forests through boreal forests to alpine/subalpine meadows and alpine tundra. Grizzly bears are omnivorous and opportunistic in their feeding habits. In late spring and early summer, the bulk of their diet is green leafy material. They will also feed on insects, fruits, berries, fish, carrion and small and large mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Brown Bear Ursus Arctos As Seed Disperser: a Case Study with the Bilberry Vaccinium Myrtillus
    The role of the brown bear Ursus arctos as seed disperser: a case study with the bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus Rola niedźwiedzia brunatnego Ursus arctos w rozprzestrzenianiu nasion: studium przypadku na przykładzie borówki czarnej Vaccinium myrtillus PhD thesis Alberto García-Rodríguez Kraków, 2021 To the memory of José Ignacio and Javier Rodríguez Val Female brown bear with two cubs of the year feeding on bilberry fruits in Tatra National Park (July 2020) “They thought they were burying you, they did not know they were burying a seed” Ernesto Cardenal, Nicaraguan priest, poet and politician PhD CANDIDATE mgr. ALBERTO GARCÍA-RODRÍGUEZ Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences Al. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Krakow, Poland SUPERVISOR dr. hab. NURIA SELVA FERNÁNDEZ Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences Al. Adama Mickiewicza 33, 31-120, Krakow, Poland CO-SUPERVISOR dr. JÖRG ALBRECHT Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F) Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. The PhD thesis was prepared during doctoral studies in the Doctoral Study of Natural Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Kraków. CONTENTS SUMMARY…………..……………..…………………………...………………………………………………...5 STRESZCZENIE……...………….……………………………………………………………………………….8 INTRODUCTION……………………...………………………………………………….……………………...11 PAPER I The role of the brown bear Ursus arctos as a legitimate megafaunal seed disperser………………..…30 PAPER II The bear-berry connection: ecological and management implications of
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Grande Ronde Lignite Field, Asotin County
    BRIAN J. BOYLE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS STATE OF WASHINGTON ART STEARNS, Supervisor RAYMOND LASMANIS, State Geologist DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE GRANDE RONDE LIGNITE FIELD, ASOTIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON By Keith L. Stoffel Report of Investigations 27 1984 BRIAN J. BOYLE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS STATE OF WASHINGTON ART STEARNS, Supervisor RAYMOND LASMANIS, State Geologist DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE GRANDE RONDE LIGNITE FIELD, ASOTIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON By Keith L. Stoff el Report of Investigations 27 Printed in the United States of America 1984 For sale by the Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington Price $4.00 CONTENTS Page Abstract t • t t Ott t t t t t I It t t t t t too It Ott It t It t It t t t Ott t t t t t t t I t t I It t It t t It 1 Introduction . 2 Location and geographic setting . 2 Purpose and scope of study . 3 Methods of study . 3 Acknowledgments . 4 Geology of the Columbia Plateau . 6 General geologic setting . 6 Stratigraphic nomenclature . 7 Columbia River Basalt Group . 7 Ellensburg and Latah Formations . 8 Stratigraphy . 8 Regional stratigraphy . 8 Imnaha and Picture Gorge Basalts . 8 Yakima Basalt Subgroup . 9 Grande Ronde Basalt . 9 Wanapum Basalt . 9 Saddle Mountains Basalt ... .............. .. ........ .... 10 Stratigraphy of the Grande Ronde lignite field . 11 Structure ................................. ...................... .. 13 Evolution of the Blue Mountains province . 13 Structural geology of the Grande Ronde River-Blue Mountains region .......... 15 Folds . ............. .................... .............. 15 Faults .
    [Show full text]
  • Auggie Creek Restoration/Fuels Project Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Plant Report Darlene Lavelle December 17, 2008
    Auggie Creek Restoration/Fuels Project Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Plant Report Darlene Lavelle December 17, 2008 Introduction The Seeley Lake Ranger District, Lolo National Forest (LNF), is proposing a restoration project designed to restore forest conditions on approximately 965 acres of Forest Service lands within the Auggie, Seeley, and Mountain Creek drainages. The vegetation treatments are designed to develop a diverse mix of vegetative composition and structure, reduce the risk of bark beetle infestations, and reduce the threat of sustained high intensity wildfire in the wildland-urban interface. Commercial and noncommercial treatments are proposed to reduce stand density, ladder fuels and ground litter, and some dead and down woody debris. Reducing fuels would thereby reduce the risk from insect and disease damage and also the potential for high intensity natural fires around private homes. Fire would also allow an increase of nutrients to plants on the site. Other project proposals include: • Herbicide treatment of weeds along the approximate 12.45 miles of timber haul routes and landings and the approximate 2.37 miles of stored or decommissioned roads mentioned below; • Build about 0.59 miles of temporary road for tree harvest and then decommission these roads. • Store about 1.78 miles of road (close roads to vehicular traffic but keep roads for future use) • Plant western larch and Douglas-fir on about 44 acres within the commercial treatment units to enhance species diversity. • Replace two culverts which are fish barriers, along Swamp Creek and Trail Creek. • Implement additional best management practices (BMPs) involving road drainage at the Morrell Creek Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Analysis of Plant Community Types of Writing-On-Stone Provincial Park
    Survey and Analysis of Plant Community Types of Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park Survey and Analysis of Plant Community Types of Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park FINAL REPORT Prepared for Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Resource Data Branch Edmonton, Alberta Prepared by Wildlands Ecological Consulting Ltd. #60 Neal Close, Red Deer, AB T4P 1N4 Office: (403) 346-1057 Fax: (403) 346-3257 March 29, 2004 ABSTRACT Identification and monitoring of biological diversity in Alberta is the primary mandate of Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre (ANHIC). A fundamental strategy in the preservation of functional ecosystems is to identify and preserve a full compliment of habitat types, which in return support a diversity of animals, plants, and other life forms. Vegetation is an integral component of habitat and provides a relatively easy means of inventory and monitoring of ecosystem health both spatially and temporally. The current study, in Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park, focuses on the identification of unique riparian and coulee plant associations, or plant community type. The study area is situated approximately 8 km north of the USA border and 40 km east of the town of Milk River and occurs at the interface between the Mixedgrass and Dry Mixedgrass Natural Subregions. Priority research is currently required to address gaps in the identification, description and distribution of plant associations within the coulee and riparian zones of these Subregions. Many of these communities recur over the landscape but may occur as very small patches of 1m2 or less. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (ASRD) Resource Data Division contracted Wildlands Ecological to complete an inventory of natural/semi-natural plant communities, statistically analyse the data, and describe potential plant community or association types.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife-Habitat Relationships of the Grande Ronde River
    Wildlife-Habitat Relationships of the Grande Ronde River by Aryn E. Hayden ABSTRACT In selecting habitat animal species require food, water and adequate cover. When these criteria are taken into account it appears that habitats utilized by terrestrial wildlife along the Grande Ronde River change longitudinally from mixed conifer forests to ponderosa pine forests in the headwaters and middle reaches to grassland and shrub-steppe in the lower reaches. Species diversity of mammals, birds and reptiles within these habitats will also decrease towards the lower reaches to some degree as habitat changes along the Grande Ronde River. A potential decrease in species diversity as habitat changes may indicate that habitat specialist species are more likely to be found in the headwaters of and middle reaches while habitat generalists are likely to be found in the middle and lower reaches of the Grande Ronde River. This concept of decreasing species diversity in a downstream gradient indicates that the River Continuum Concept, traditionally an aquatic hypothesis, may have some applicability to distributions of terrestrial wildlife in the context of riverine ecosystems. Species diversity of terrestrial wildlife is also heavily influenced by the presence of riparian vegetation along the river. Riparian vegetation is likely to be found within the headwaters and middle reaches of the Grande Ronde River and in patches pertaining to locations of physical complexity along the river such as confluences with tributaries. Riparian vegetation provides complex habitat for mammals and birds that live along the river and those that utilize riparian habitat for foraging, water requirements, migration or other activities necessary for survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Cougar Mountain Wilderness Evaluation
    May-June 2009 Cougar Mountain Wilderness Evaluation WILDERNESS EVALUATION Cougar Mountain - 621014 6,145 acres OVERVIEW History The first roadless area review and evaluation (RARE I) was completed in 1973 and the Cougar Mountain Roadless Area was identified but not chosen for future wilderness study. In 1979, the second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) was completed and the Cougar Mountain Roadless Area was not recommended for wilderness. The 2006 inventory removed approximately 189 acres from previous inventory due to nonconforming uses such as road construction and logging; 1,771 acres were added to the previous inventory as they met the criteria for a potential wilderness area (PWA) as described in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12, Chapter 70. The following chart depicts the current 1988 Colville National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan direction for the 2006 inventoried PWA. Table 1--Management area percentages (rounded) Colville National Forest MA1 MA3A MA3B MA5 MA6 MA7 MA8 Old Growth Recreation Recreation/ Scenic Scenic/ Wood/ Winter Dependant Wildlife Timber Winter Forage Range Species Range Habitat 27% 3% 35% 3% 2% 12% 18% Location and Access The PWA is located 51 miles west of Colville, Washington, and 17 miles southeast of Republic, Washington. The nearest large population center is Spokane, Washington, which is three hours driving time from the area. The southern boundary of the PWA is common with the Colville Indian Reservation. The north boundary parallels Ninemile Creek. The west boundary parallels State Highway 21. The east boundary is the Cougar Mountain Road (Forest Road #2054). Access to the area is from the Cougar Mountain Road (Forest Road #2054) on the north and from State Highway 21 on the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2019 to 06/30/2019 Wallowa-Whitman National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Regional Aquatic Restoration - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants In Progress: Expected:07/2019 07/2019 James Capurso Project - Watershed management Comment Period Public Notice 503-808-2847 EA 10/12/2018 [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The USFS is proposing a suite of aquatic restoration activities for Region 6 to address ongoing needs, all of which have completed consultation, including activities such as fish passage restoration, wood placement, and other restoration activities. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=53001 Location: UNIT - R6 - Pacific Northwest Region All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Clallam, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Douglas, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Mason, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Spokane, Stevens, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Whitman, Yakima, Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine,
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa-Grande Ronde River
    Wallowa-Grande Ronde River The Grande Ronde flows through the Blue Mountains of Northeast Oregon in an area the Native Americans called "the land of winding waters." It is a fast-flowing river through a canyon carpeted in green by a thick conifer forest. The rugged canyon walls rise from 3,000 to 4,000 feet above the river. The clear water and deep green forests accented by black outcroppings of basalt cliffs combine to create a stunning setting. The rapids are mild and this is the perfect river for family groups with young children, or people wanting to try inflatable kayaking for the first-time. We also use paddle rafts and for camp gear, oar rafts, which are also available to carry passengers. Along the way, we may be fortunate to see Rocky Mountain Elk, mule or white-tail deer and big horn sheep. This country is critical winter habitat for all these species and more. We'll certainly see various birds of prey, including the probability of bald eagles. Mergansers (a river duck) are frequently sighted, as well as countless song-birds. Fishermen will enjoy casting a line for the rainbow trout that live in the river. In 1988, in recognition of the outstanding resource values of the Grande Ronde River, Congress designated a 44-mile segment as a National Wild and Scenic River. Trips begin at the put-in at Minam, Oregon, on the Wallowa River. We travel around 10 miles the first day on the frolicking, fast-flowing Wallowa, passing through dramatic forested canyons. We reach the confluence with the Grande Ronde late afternoon and make camp shortly thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Availability and Grizzly Bear (Ursus Arctos) Selection of Post-Fire and Thinned Forests in the Mountain National Parks of Canada
    Food availability and grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) selection of post-fire and thinned forests in the mountain national parks of Canada by Charles Robert McLellan A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Biology Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta © Charles Robert McLellan, 2018 Abstract Human-caused mortality and habitat loss have led to the extirpation of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) across much of their North American range. Today, these factors continue to limit extant grizzly bear populations as productive habitats often occur in areas with elevated mortality risk creating ecological traps. Maintaining viable grizzly bear populations and preventing further range loss requires minimizing human-caused mortality and maintaining, or enhancing, productive habitats in secure locations. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of post-fire and forest thinning on grizzly bear habitat quality in Banff, Yoho, and Kootenay national parks to assess whether these disturbances enhance grizzly bear habitat. Specifically, I first estimated grizzly bear selection of post-fire habitats across different spatial and temporal scales using data from 26 radio-collared grizzly bears. Factors that influenced grizzly bear selection of burns were then used to predict locations (map) where prescribed burning will most effectively create habitat attractive to bears. Second, I compared the presence and abundance of 25 known grizzly bear foods between burns, thinned forests, and adjacent undisturbed forests testing which factors (climate, terrain, or disturbance) most contributed to their occurrence thus informing future burn or thinning prescriptions. Grizzly bear selection of burns was scale dependant.
    [Show full text]