Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox V4.6

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox V4.6 ATTITUDE AND ORBIT CONTROL USING THE SPACECRAFT CONTROL TOOLBOX V4.6 by the Staff of Princeton Satellite Systems, Inc. The software described in this document is furnished under a license agreement. The software may be used, copied or translated into other languages only under the terms of the license agreement. Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox v4.6 (December 2000) © Copyright 1996-2000 by Princeton Satellite Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Any provision of Princeton Satellite System Software to the U.S. Government is with “Restricted Rights” as follows: Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions set forth in subparagraphs (a) through (d) of the Commercial Computer Restricted Rights clause at FAR 52.227-19 when applicable, or in subparagraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 252.227-7013, and in similar clause in the NASA FAR Supplement. Any provision of Princeton Satellite Systems documentation to the U.S. Government is with Limited Rights. The contractor/manufacturer is Princeton Satellite Systems, Inc., 33 Witherspoon Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08542. MATLAB is a registered trademark of The MathWorks, Inc. Macintosh is a registered trademark of Apple Computer, Inc. Silicon Graphics is a registered trademark os Silicon Graphics Adobe, Acrobat and FrameMaker are trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated. All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders. All other brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations. Printing History December 2000 First Printing Princeton Satellite Systems, Inc. 33 Witherspoon Street Princeton, New Jersey 08542 Technical Support/Sales/Info: http://www.psatellite.com For Marilyn and Eric Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 Introduction 21 Spacecraft Control 21 Introduction 21 Mnemonics 22 Control System Design 22 Dynamics and Modeling of Systems 22 Software Design 23 User Interface Design 24 Spacecraft Operations 24 The Spacecraft Control Engineer’s Job 24 This Book 24 ACS Terms 24 Pointing Accuracy 25 Pointing Knowledge 25 Pointing Stability 25 Jitter 25 What A Spacecraft Control Engineer Needs To Know 26 CHAPTER 2 Design Process 29 Introduction 29 Design Issues 29 Introduction 29 Requirements Evaluation and Interpretation 29 Databases 30 Configuration Management of Software and Documentation 31 Test Plans 31 Design Process 31 Steps in the Process 31 General Comments 33 CHAPTER 3 Preliminary Designs 35 Introduction 35 Requirements Analysis 36 Direct Requirements 36 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox 5 Indirect (or Derived) Requirements 37 Control System Requirements 37 Satellite Design 38 Selecting a Satellite Configuration 38 Selecting Actuators 39 Selecting Sensors 41 Cost 42 CHAPTER 4 Mathematics 45 Introduction 45 Vectors and Matrices 45 Notation 45 Vector and Matrix Representations of Operations 47 Matrix Operations 47 Special Matrices 48 The Matrix Inverse 48 Useful Matrix-Vector Identities 49 Floating Point Operations Required for Matrix Arithmetic 50 Spherical Geometry 50 Differential Equations 51 Introduction 51 Numerical Integration 52 Discontinuities 53 Stiff Equations 54 Probability 55 CHAPTER 5 Time 57 Introduction 57 Time Scales 57 CHAPTER 6 Coordinate Transformations 59 Coordinate Frames 59 Transformation Matrices 62 Quaternions 64 Introduction 64 Fundamental Properties of the Quaternion 65 Quaternion Nomenclature 66 Quaternion Operations 67 Quaternion Transformations 67 6 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox Quaternion Derivative 68 Linearization of the Quaternion 69 Small Angles 73 Physical Interpretation of the Quaternion 73 CHAPTER 7 Control Design 75 Introduction 75 The General Control System 75 Fundamental Relationships 76 Tracking Errors 79 State Space Closed Loop Equations 81 Approaches to Robust Control 82 Introduction 82 Modeling Uncertainty 83 Control Structure Design 86 Nyquist Like Techniques 86 Quantitative Feedback Theory 87 LQG Methods 88 H∞ and m synthesis 89 Single-Input Single-Output Control Design 91 Introduction 91 Elementary Loop Compensation 91 Digital Control 98 Introduction 98 Modified Continuous Design 99 Flexible Spacecraft Control 114 Introduction 114 Two Coupled Inertias 114 Lead Compensation of the Minimum Phase System 118 Non-Collocated Sensor and Actuator 120 CHAPTER 8 Command Distribution 125 Introduction 125 The Optimal Torque Distribution Problem 125 Examples 127 Reaction Wheels 127 Gimbaled Thrusters 128 Simplex 129 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox 7 CHAPTER 9 Attitude Dynamics 131 Introduction 131 Rigid Body 131 Multibody 133 Pivoted Momentum Wheel 135 Modeling Flexible Structures 139 CHAPTER 10 Orbits 143 Representations of Orbits 143 Propagating Orbits 144 CHAPTER 11 Budgets 147 Introduction 147 Pointing Budgets 147 Methodology 147 Beam Pointing Accuracy 148 Example Pointing Budget 148 Propellant Budgets 149 Introduction 149 Example Propellant Budget 150 CHAPTER 12 Sensors 153 Introduction 153 Types of Sensors 153 Optical Sensors 154 Star Trackers and Cameras 154 Horizon Sensors 155 Earth Sensors 156 Analog Sun Sensors 157 Digital Sun Sensors 158 Gyros 158 Other Sensors 159 Magnetometers 159 Accelerometers 159 CHAPTER 13 Actuators 161 Introduction 161 8 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox Types of Actuators 161 Stepping Motor Model 162 Introduction 162 Electromechanical Dynamics 162 Reaction Wheel Model 164 Introduction 164 Motor Model 164 Reaction Wheel State Equations 165 Tachometer 166 Control Moment Gyro 166 Introduction 166 Modeling 167 Torque Distribution 167 Thrusters 168 Introduction 168 Physics of Thrusters 168 Pulsewidth Modulation 168 Minimum Impulse Bit 169 Time Constants 169 Fuel System 170 Magnetic Torquers 170 Solenoids 171 Introduction 171 Derivation of the equations of motion for a dual coil solenoid 172 Derivation of the equations of motion for a single coil solenoid 176 CHAPTER 14 Simulation 181 Introduction 181 Linear 182 Creating a State Space System 182 Zero Order Hold 183 First Order Hold 183 Nonlinear 184 CHAPTER 15 Disturbances 185 Introduction 185 External Disturbances 185 Introduction 185 Gravity Gradient 186 Residual Dipole 187 RF 187 Solar Pressure 187 Thruster Plumes 188 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox 9 Internal Disturbances 189 Introduction 189 Fourier Series Representation 189 CHAPTER 16 Attitude Estimation 191 Introduction 191 Introduction to Estimation Theory 191 Gyro Model 193 Conversion of Continuous Time Data to Discrete 195 Simulation of Stochastic Processes 195 The Kalman Filter Algorithm 196 Batch Methods 197 Vector Measurements 199 CHAPTER 17 Geosynchronous Satellite Control 201 Introduction 201 Requirements 201 The Design Process 202 Transfer Orbit 202 Mission Orbit Design 203 The Geometry 205 Acquisition 205 Summary 207 CHAPTER 18 Geosynchronous Spacecraft Control Design 209 A Mission Architecture 209 Design Steps 211 Spacecraft Overview 211 Spinning Transfer Orbit 213 Dynamics 213 Actuators and Sensors 214 Changing the Spin Rate 216 Attitude Determination 217 Delta V Engine Firing 218 The Transfer Orbit Generator 218 Acquisition Using The Dual Spin Turn 219 Dynamics 219 Actuators and Sensors 219 10 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox Initialization 219 Simulation 219 Pitch Acquisition 220 Disturbances 220 Dynamics 221 Introduction 221 Normal Operations 221 Dual Spin Stability 223 Stationkeeping Operations 223 Actuators and Sensors 225 Control System Organization 225 Modes 226 Earth Sensor 226 Gyros 227 Noise Filtering 227 Momentum Wheel Pitch and Tachometer Loops 227 Low Bandwidth Roll/Yaw Control 228 Thruster Control 231 High Bandwidth Roll/Yaw and Pitch Control 231 Magnetic Torquer Control 232 Thruster Control 232 Actuator Saturation 233 Thruster Resolution 233 Summary 234 CHAPTER 19 Sun Nadir Pointing Control 235 Introduction 235 Coordinate Frames 236 Sun Nadir Pointing 237 Components 239 Sensors 239 Actuators 241 Attitude Determination 242 Roll 242 Pitch 243 Sun Sensor Eye Pre-Processing 243 Solar Array Pitch 243 Yaw 244 Control 245 Reaction Wheel Loop 245 Attitude Loop 246 Solar Array Control 246 Momentum Control 246 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox 11 CHAPTER 20 ACS Testing 249 Introduction 249 Industry Examples 249 Introduction 249 Telecom 1 250 MOS-1 251 IRAS 253 INSAT I 254 Intelsat V 257 Space Telescope 258 MBB 258 MSTI and DC-X 261 Summary 262 A Testing Methodology 263 Introduction 263 Requirements Flow and Testing 263 Testing Life-Cycle for the ACS Flight Software 264 Flight Vehicle Control System Testing 266 Test Levels (Preflight) 268 Test Levels (Flight) 269 CHAPTER 21 Fault Detection 271 Introduction 271 Failures 271 Failure Analysis 273 Fault Detection Isolation and Reconfiguration 274 Introduction 274 Approaches to Redundancy Management 276 The Fault Detection and Isolation System 278 An Example Using Detection Filters 281 CHAPTER 22 References 285 Introduction 285 Dynamics 285 Attitude Estimation 286 Control 286 Spacecraft Control 286 Astrodynamics 286 Propulsion 287 Real-Time Systems 287 12 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox Devices 287 Software 287 Ephemeris 287 Heat Transfer 287 Testing 288 Coordinates 288 Failures 289 CHAPTER 23 Glossary 291 Index 295 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft Control Toolbox 13 14 Attitude and Orbit Control Using the Spacecraft
Recommended publications
  • Juno Telecommunications
    The cover The cover is an artist’s conception of Juno in orbit around Jupiter.1 The photovoltaic panels are extended and pointed within a few degrees of the Sun while the high-gain antenna is pointed at the Earth. 1 The picture is titled Juno Mission to Jupiter. See http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA13087 for the cover art and an accompanying mission overview. DESCANSO Design and Performance Summary Series Article 16 Juno Telecommunications Ryan Mukai David Hansen Anthony Mittskus Jim Taylor Monika Danos Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California October 2012 This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement by the United States Government or the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Copyright 2012 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. DESCANSO DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE SUMMARY SERIES Issued by the Deep Space Communications and Navigation Systems Center of Excellence Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Joseph H. Yuen, Editor-in-Chief Published Articles in This Series Article 1—“Mars Global
    [Show full text]
  • THE ATTITUDE CONTROL and DETERMINATION SYSTEMS of the SAS-A Satellite
    THE ATTITUDE CONTROL and DETERMINATION SYSTEMS of the SAS-A SATElliTE F. F. Mobley, A high-speed wheel inside the satellite provides the basic attitude sta­ B. E. Tossman, bilization for SAS-A. Wobbling of the spin axis is removed by an G. H. Fountain ultra-sensitive nutation damper which uses a copper vane pendulum on a taut-band suspension to dissipate energy by eddy-currents. The spin axis can be oriented anywhere in space as required for the X-ray ex­ periment by a magnetic control system operated by commands from the ground station at Quito, Ecuador. Magnetic torquing is also used to maintain the satellite spin rate at 1/ 12 revolution per minute. These systems are outgrowths of APL developments for previous satellites, chosen for simplicity and maximum expectation of satisfactory performance in orbit. The in-orbit performance has been essentially flawless. Introduction HE ATTITUDE CONTROL SYSTEM is used to a simple and reliable open-loop system, using orient SAS-A so that the X-ray detectors can commands from the ground. This is very appealing Tscan the regions of the celestial sphere in an or­ since the weight and power limitations on the derly and efficient manner to detect and measure SAS-A satellite do not permit an elaborate closed­ new X-ray sources. The two X-ray collimators loop control system. are mounted perpendicular to the satellite spin In addition to detecting and analyzing new (Z) axis. As the satellite rotates slowly about its X-ray sources, the experimenter is interested in Z axis, the detectors scan a 5-degree-wide great correlating X-ray sources with known visible stars, circle path in the celestial sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Juno Spacecraft Description
    Juno Spacecraft Description By Bill Kurth 2012-06-01 Juno Spacecraft (ID=JNO) Description The majority of the text in this file was extracted from the Juno Mission Plan Document, S. Stephens, 29 March 2012. [JPL D-35556] Overview For most Juno experiments, data were collected by instruments on the spacecraft then relayed via the orbiter telemetry system to stations of the NASA Deep Space Network (DSN). Radio Science required the DSN for its data acquisition on the ground. The following sections provide an overview, first of the orbiter, then the science instruments, and finally the DSN ground system. Juno launched on 5 August 2011. The spacecraft uses a deltaV-EGA trajectory consisting of a two-part deep space maneuver on 30 August and 14 September 2012 followed by an Earth gravity assist on 9 October 2013 at an altitude of 559 km. Jupiter arrival is on 5 July 2016 using two 53.5-day capture orbits prior to commencing operations for a 1.3-(Earth) year-long prime mission comprising 32 high inclination, high eccentricity orbits of Jupiter. The orbit is polar (90 degree inclination) with a periapsis altitude of 4200-8000 km and a semi-major axis of 23.4 RJ (Jovian radius) giving an orbital period of 13.965 days. The primary science is acquired for approximately 6 hours centered on each periapsis although fields and particles data are acquired at low rates for the remaining apoapsis portion of each orbit. Juno is a spin-stabilized spacecraft equipped for 8 diverse science investigations plus a camera included for education and public outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • 19.1 Attitude Determination and Control Systems Scott R. Starin
    19.1 Attitude Determination and Control Systems Scott R. Starin, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center John Eterno, Southwest Research Institute In the year 1900, Galveston, Texas, was a bustling direct hit as Ike came ashore. Almost 200 people in the community of approximately 40,000 people. The Caribbean and the United States lost their lives; a former capital of the Republic of Texas remained a tragedy to be sure, but far less deadly than the 1900 trade center for the state and was one of the largest storm. This time, people were prepared, having cotton ports in the United States. On September 8 of received excellent warning from the GOES satellite that year, however, a powerful hurricane struck network. The Geostationary Operational Environmental Galveston island, tearing the Weather Bureau wind Satellites have been a continuous monitor of the gauge away as the winds exceeded 100 mph and world’s weather since 1975, and they have since been bringing a storm surge that flooded the entire city. The joined by other Earth-observing satellites. This weather worst natural disaster in United States’ history—even surveillance to which so many now owe their lives is today—the hurricane caused the deaths of between possible in part because of the ability to point 6000 and 8000 people. Critical in the events that led to accurately and steadily at the Earth below. The such a terrible loss of life was the lack of precise importance of accurately pointing spacecraft to our knowledge of the strength of the storm before it hit. daily lives is pervasive, yet somehow escapes the notice of most people.
    [Show full text]
  • + New Horizons
    Media Contacts NASA Headquarters Policy/Program Management Dwayne Brown New Horizons Nuclear Safety (202) 358-1726 [email protected] The Johns Hopkins University Mission Management Applied Physics Laboratory Spacecraft Operations Michael Buckley (240) 228-7536 or (443) 778-7536 [email protected] Southwest Research Institute Principal Investigator Institution Maria Martinez (210) 522-3305 [email protected] NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Operations George Diller (321) 867-2468 [email protected] Lockheed Martin Space Systems Launch Vehicle Julie Andrews (321) 853-1567 [email protected] International Launch Services Launch Vehicle Fran Slimmer (571) 633-7462 [email protected] NEW HORIZONS Table of Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................ 2 Quick Facts .............................................................................................................................. 3 Pluto at a Glance ...................................................................................................................... 5 Why Pluto and the Kuiper Belt? The Science of New Horizons ............................... 7 NASA’s New Frontiers Program ........................................................................................14 The Spacecraft ........................................................................................................................15 Science Payload ...............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Cubesat Attitude Control System Based on Embedded Magnetorquers in Photovoltaic Panels Mario Castro Santiago Junio De 2018
    Trabajo Fin de Grado en F´ısica Cubesat Attitude Control System based on embedded magnetorquers in photovoltaic panels Mario Castro Santiago Junio de 2018 Tutor: Andres´ Mar´ıa Roldan´ Aranda Departamento de Electr´onicay Tecnolog´ıade Computadores Universidad de Granada Abstract The use of magnetic actuation in order to stabilize and control a small 1U Cubesat is studied and analyzed, as a required step for the devel- opment of the future university satellite GranaSAT-I. This thesis gather crucial theoretical contents concerning the attitude control of a satellite in an orbit below 500 km, where the International Space Station is able to deploy nano-satellites. Moreover, these contents have been imple- mented in a MATLAB simulator. One stabilizing control law has been succesfully tested with this tool, and two different control algorithms have shown partial success when a 3-axis control has been required. In parallel, an autonomous Cubesat prototype has been manufactured in the GranaSAT Laboratory. The stabilizing algorithm has been imple- mented on the onboard computer. Telemetry data during tests reflect an adequate performance of the prototype. Resumen Se estudia el uso de actuadores magneticos´ con el objetivo de estabi- lizar y controlar un pequeno˜ Cubesat 1U, como paso necesario para el desarrollo futuro satelite´ universitario GranaSAT-I. Esta tesis recaba contenidos teoricos´ fundamentales respecto al control de orientacion´ de un satelite´ en una orbita´ por debajo de 500 km, donde la Estacion´ Espacial Internacional es capaz de lanzar nano-satelites.´ Ademas,´ esta teor´ıa ha sido implementada en un simulador en MATLAB. Con esta herramienta, se ha probado con exito´ un algoritmo de estabilizacion,´ y dos algoritmos de control han mostrado un exito´ parcial cuando un control en los tres ejes ha sido necesario.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Sector Brochure
    SPACE SPACE REVOLUTIONIZING THE WAY TO SPACE SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGIES PROPULSION Moog provides components and subsystems for cold gas, chemical, and electric Moog is a proven leader in components, subsystems, and systems propulsion and designs, develops, and manufactures complete chemical propulsion for spacecraft of all sizes, from smallsats to GEO spacecraft. systems, including tanks, to accelerate the spacecraft for orbit-insertion, station Moog has been successfully providing spacecraft controls, in- keeping, or attitude control. Moog makes thrusters from <1N to 500N to support the space propulsion, and major subsystems for science, military, propulsion requirements for small to large spacecraft. and commercial operations for more than 60 years. AVIONICS Moog is a proven provider of high performance and reliable space-rated avionics hardware and software for command and data handling, power distribution, payload processing, memory, GPS receivers, motor controllers, and onboard computing. POWER SYSTEMS Moog leverages its proven spacecraft avionics and high-power control systems to supply hardware for telemetry, as well as solar array and battery power management and switching. Applications include bus line power to valves, motors, torque rods, and other end effectors. Moog has developed products for Power Management and Distribution (PMAD) Systems, such as high power DC converters, switching, and power stabilization. MECHANISMS Moog has produced spacecraft motion control products for more than 50 years, dating back to the historic Apollo and Pioneer programs. Today, we offer rotary, linear, and specialized mechanisms for spacecraft motion control needs. Moog is a world-class manufacturer of solar array drives, propulsion positioning gimbals, electric propulsion gimbals, antenna positioner mechanisms, docking and release mechanisms, and specialty payload positioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Skylab Attitude and Pointing Control System
    I' NASA TECHNICAL NOTE SKYLAB ATTITUDE AND POINTING CONTROL SYSTEM by W. B. Chzlbb and S. M. Seltzer George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, Ala. 35812 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, 0. C. FEBRUARY 1971 I I TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM .. -, - ___.. 0132813 I. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMNT ACCESSION NO. j. KtLIPlbNl'b LAIALOb NO. - NASA- __ TN D-6068 I I 1 1. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE L February 1971 Skylab Attitude and Pointing Control System 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE __- I 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMlNG ORGANlZATlON REPORT # - W... -B. Chubb and S. M. Seltzer I 3. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. 908 52 10 0000 M211 965 21 00 0000 George C. Marshall Space Flight Center I' 1. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama 35812 L 13. TYPE OF REPORY & PERIOD COVERED - _-- .. .- __ 2. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AN0 ADORES5 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Note Washington, D. C. 20546 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE -. - - I 5. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Prepared by: Astrionics Laboratory Science and Engineering Directorate ~- 6. ABSTRACT NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center is developing an earth-orbiting manned space station called Skylab. The purpose of Skylab is to perform scientific experiments in solar astronomy and earth resources and to study biophysical and physical properties in a zero gravity environment. The attitude and pointing control system requirements are dictated by onboard experiments. These requirements and the resulting attitude and pointing control system are presented. 18 .- 0 1 STR inUT I ONSmTEMeNT Space station Control moment gyro Unclassified - Unlimited Attitude control -~ 9.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the New Horizons Spacecraft Glen H. Fountain, David Y
    The New Horizons Spacecraft Glen H. Fountain, David Y. Kusnierkiewicz, Christopher B. Hersman, Timothy S. Herder, Thomas B Coughlin, William T. Gibson, Deborah A. Clancy, Christopher C. DeBoy, T. Adrian Hill, James D. Kinnison, Douglas S. Mehoke, Geffrey K. Ottman, Gabe D. Rogers, S. Alan Stern, James M. Stratton, Steven R. Vernon, Stephen P. Williams Abstract The New Horizons spacecraft was launched on January 19, 2006. The spacecraft was designed to provide a platform for the seven instruments designated by the science team to collect and return data from Pluto in 2015 that would meet the requirements established by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Announcement of Opportunity AO-OSS-01. The design drew on heritage from previous missions developed at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) and other NASA missions such as Ulysses. The trajectory design imposed constraints on mass and structural strength to meet the high launch acceleration consistent with meeting the AO requirement of returning data prior to the year 2020. The spacecraft subsystems were designed to meet tight resource allocations (mass and power) yet provide the necessary control and data handling finesse to support data collection and return when the one way light time during the Pluto fly-by is 4.5 hours. Missions to the outer regions of the solar system (where the solar irradiance is 1/1000 of the level near the Earth) require a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) to supply electrical power. One RTG was available for use by New Horizons. To accommodate this constraint, the spacecraft electronics were designed to operate on less than 200 W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Gravitational Accelerations of the Cassini Spacecraft
    THE NON-GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATIONS OF THE CASSINI SPACECRAFT Mauro Di Benedetto (1), Luciano Iess (1), Duane C. Roth(2), [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (1) Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale e Astronautica, Università di Roma “Sapienza”, Italy (2) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA ABSTRACT Accurate orbit determination of interplanetary spacecraft requires good knowledge of non- gravitational accelerations. Unfortunately, design and ground tests do not provide enough information for accurate modeling. Indeed, effects such as solar torque induced thruster firings and variations of thermo-optical coefficients, controlling solar radiation pressure, cannot be predicted very accurately and require an in-flight estimation. The accuracy of such determination relies on good quality radio-metric data. Cassini, a large planetary mission devoted to the study of Saturn and its satellites, is endowed with a unique radio system, enabling highly stable, coherent radio links to ground in X- and Ka-band. The leading Cassini non-gravitational accelerations are due to solar pressure and anisotropic thermal emission from the three on-board radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs). With an initial area-to-mass ratio of about 0.0023 m2 kg-1, the effect of the solar radiation pressure decreased below that of the RTGs at about 2.7 AU. At the distance of the first radio science cruise experiment (6.65 AU) it was about 5×10-13 km s-2, approximately 1/6 of the acceleration due to the RTGs. The separation of the two sources of non-gravitational accelerations is complicated by the use of thrusters to control the spacecraft attitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Attitude Control
    A SunCam online continuing education course Spacecraft Subsystems Part 1 ‒ Fundamentals of Attitude Control by Michael A. Benoist, P.E. Spacecraft Subsystems Part 1 ‒ Fundamentals of Attitude Control A SunCam online continuing education course Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 Reference Frames........................................................................................................................ 6 Representations ........................................................................................................................... 7 Dynamics .................................................................................................................................. 11 2. Determination Methods ...................................................................................................... 12 Vector Algorithms .................................................................................................................... 15 Sensor Methods ......................................................................................................................... 18 Kalman Filter ............................................................................................................................ 20 Single-Axis Measurements ....................................................................................................... 22 3. Control Methods ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Experience of Cassini Spacecraft Attitude Control at Saturn
    Cassini-Huygens Flight Experience of Cassini Spacecraft Attitude Control at Saturn Thomas Burk Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Copyright 2011 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged 2011 AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit 1 August 10, 2011 Cassini-Huygens 2011 AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit 2 August 10, 2011 Cassini-Huygens Cassini Spacecraft Magnetometer Boom: 11 meters long Radio and Plasma Wave Antennas (1 of 3) 10 meters long (each) Radioisotope Thermal Generator (1 of 3) • RTGs produced 880W of power at launch in 1997. Today: 665 W • Spacecraft Mass at Launch: 5600 kg. Today: 2325 kg – Bi-Propellant Load at Launch: 3000 kg. Today: 142 kg (5%) – Hydrazine Load at Launch: 132 kg. Today: 62 kg (47%) 2011 AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit 3 August 10, 2011 Cassini-Huygens 2011 AIAA GNC Conference and Exhibit 4 August 10, 2011 Cassini-Huygens Attitude Estimator Design (Extended Kalman-Bucy Filter) • Attitude Determination modes: – Nominal mode: Combine data from Stellar Reference Unit (SRU) and Inertial Reference Units (IRU) • Stellar Reference Unit (SRU, Prime and B/U): Stellar reference via: – Five stars captured by star tracker, provides 3-axis attitude knowledge – An on-board star catalog – Star IDentification (SID) algorithm • Inertial Reference Unit (Prime and B/U): Propagate attitude knowledge from star update to update – Hemispheric Resonator Gyroscopes – Each IRU contains four gyros – Prime IRU used continuously since launch – SID Suspend mode: During Tour, Saturn, rings,
    [Show full text]