Eastern Illinois University The Keep

Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications

1981 Marlowe's Doctor Faustus Finds Reality: In the Comic Mask Eva Marie Enis Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in English at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program.

Recommended Citation Enis, Eva Marie, "Marlowe's Doctor Faustus Finds Reality: In the Comic Mask" (1981). Masters Theses. 2996. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2996

This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ( 'flll•:SIS RF:PHODlJCTION CERTIFIC ATE

T O : Graduate Deg ree Candidates who have written formal theses.

SU BJECT: Permission to reproduce theses.

The University Library i s receiving a number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their Library holdings. Although no copyright Laws are involved. we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtalned from the author before we allow theses ~o be copied.

P lease sign one of the following statements:

Booth L ibrary of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable c ollege or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or research holdings.

Date Author

I re s pectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University not a llow my thesis be reproduced because ------

Date Author

m MARLOWE'S DOCTOR FAUSTUS FINDS REALITY: IN THE CCMIC MASK (TITLE)

BY

ETA MARIE ENIS

THESIS

SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF

MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS

1981 YEAR

I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE

:;zg ~ !fl'/ ATE ' tt;

z ftftifl'jTE fl · MARI.DWE I S DOCTOR · FAUSTUS

FINre REALITY: IN THE COMIC MASK

BI

ETA MARIE ENIS

B• .A.. in Eng., College or St. Francie, 1968

~RACT OF A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the re~uirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English at the Graduate School of Eastern Illinois Uni versit7 CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1981 Schol.are have considered the protagonist of Christopher Marlowe's !h! Tragical History of~ Life~ Death ,!Z! Doctor Faustus from nearly every perspective, but, at the same time, they have been hesitant to recognize the humorous incidents, particularly the so-called clownish scenes, as having a legitimate place even though much comic incident appears in Marlowe' e source. Though scholars have acknowledged Marlowe's play- to be a morality, they have not viewed Faustus as a morality charac­ ter: whose comic mask is his reality. An examination of the morality tradition, with Marlowe's debt to the morality- in mind, justifies the inclusion of much humorous matter in a play often assumed to be tragic. The original morality was a Ps:,chomachia--an allegorical conflict of man's soul between good and m.1--whoee outcome was a triumph for good. Its dramatis personae-­ personifications ot good and evil forces--show that the comic characters vere always tied to evil effects. These comic-evil characters satirized the protagonist's sins through burlesque techniques. Thus exaggeration and distortion made his sins appear absurdly funny. After the Reforma­ tion, a new "hybrid" form--a homiletic tragedy-emerged. It provided for comic scenes that were longer and more vivid than the serious and, now emphasizing mankind's failings, reversed the usually triumphant ending. Also, a fusion of the good and the evil torcee into one character created the •Vice," a protagonist with a dualistic personality- comparable to mmldnd. When stage impersonations became a popular means for propaganda, the developed Vice--basicall:7 an abstraction--could be adapted by the playwright to variable situations when clothed with a proper name and matching costume. Marlowe's ingenuity- enabled him to weave historical and philosophical ideas into the script ot Doctor Faustus, whose pro­ tagonist ot the same name was modelled in part on the Vice character~ 11 Marlowe disguised his protagonist as a scholar who rejected the tradi­ tional culture (i.e., white magic) and selected the counter-culture

(i.e., black magic) in an attempt to overcome his existential dilemma.

Marlowe made Faustus represent two aspects or humanity. First, dressed in the scholar's robe, Faustus represents the intellectual with his "cool tranquil idealism," who is good. Second, when he rejects all known knowl­ edge and accepts the unknown, he discards the scholar's robe, ironically declares his own doom "Consummatum est," and unwittingly becomes a repre­ sentation o! the clown with "bestial impulses" in the '-'figure ot a tool," who is evil. Realizing his mistake, Faustus seeks an anodyne !or his fears. while he vacillates between th~ughts of good and evil. The insid- • • I • 1ous corruption or Faustus' mind creates his downfall; his cl,ownishness

11 a frivolous aftermath o! self-deception which creates his hell on earth and causes him to conclude his lite as a coward; dismembered psy­ chologically and literally.

In the play, humorous elements work as an an~e, as evocation ot the hybrid "Vice," and as a means to convey Faustus• psychological state after his "tall." The rollicking rhytl:ms ot the clowns . in the first part

or the play and the low lrumor with matching antics o! Faustus himself in the second part successfully lull the consciousness or the audience--up to a point--and it comes as a shock that Faustus is actually damned in. a reversal or the simple morality. As Vice, whose reality is the comic mask, Faustus is only a metaphorical f i gure, a personification ot an abetraction, hence an amoral non-being capable or performing exaggerated abeurdities to please his audience while displaying through speech and

actions the absurdity or mankind's aspirations, whether for "belly cheer" or infinite power and knowledge. 111 Wer tertig 1st, dem 1st nichts recht zu machen, Ein Werdender wird 1.mmer dankbar sein. vca lorspiel aut dem Theater in Goethe's FAUST Scholars have considered the protagonist of Christopher Marlowe's

!!!! Tragical Historz .2! !h! ~ ~ Death ,2! Doctor Faustus from near­ q every perspectiveJ but, at the same· time, they have been hesitant to r~cognize the humorous incidents, particularly' the so-called clownish scenes, as belonging to the original drama. Through an examination ot Marlowe's play, I hope to show that both the comical scenes in .the main plot and the low characters•. antics in the subplot are an integral part ot Marlowe's means to characterize the absurdi ty- ot an aspiring scholar who wishes to evade mankind's existential dilemma and who umdttingq becomes a clown. Anong critics who neglect or deplore the corde "intrusiona8 are

John Addington Symonds, u. M. Ellis-Fermor, John Bakelesa, Paul Kocher,

Harry- Lenn, and Wilbur Sanders. Symonds ana~es the •perplexities" 1 ot Faustus• •dinded spirit," but nowhere conaidera the low humor 2 that is also part ot 1 t. It is rather obvious that Ellis-Ferm.or does

not consider the middle part of the plq as belonging to it original~ because she states thats

The fora ot Faustus is a little like that of all ruins--the design is not obvious, but it can be perceived. Ir the roof' of a cathedral were broken in several places and patehed with rococo work and frivolous, degenerate ornaments, no architect would be deceived. Rather, hia first thought would take the form of Goethe's excluationa "Wie gross 1st allea angelegt!" The ribs or the original arches can be discerned, though their continuity is broken and their surface deformed.) 2

ET.1.dentq, she recogniua the clowning to be the work ot an interpolatar. It is somewhat difficult to assess John Bakelesa' opinion ot the comical scenes in Faustus. In his earlier book, Christopher Marlowet

,!h! !!!!! ~ .!t! Time (1937), Bakeless says that there is "not any doubt• that Doctor Faustus is a "re-writing of the English Faustbook,"" noting also that Marlowe "hard~ troubles to adapt its material but copies it almost Terbat1m.•S FiTe 7ears later, Bakeless discusses the clownish ecenes and wonders specitical~ whether or not Marlowe "had anything 6 to do vith them • • • • • Paul Kocher takes an even less humorless T.1.ev. Because, tor him, Marlon~ heroes are "projeeti.ons ot one man, one spirit••• Christopher Marlmre"7 and because he parallels the apostU7 and despair ot Faustus vi.th a possibq dark hour in the life of Marlowe, Kocher can on~ see Faustus• •sense ot the loss or God, his agonised despair• as •the gist ot the pla7."8 Bury- Lenn also tails to consider the pl,q' s comic aspects. Though he presents in graceful prose critical insights tor nearly en17 important serioua scene, ~T.l.n is not concerned with the middle section. He does not coru,ider these scenes to be the vork of Marlowe, and he is ready to dismiss the• as "unquestionabq veak." 9 In the same win, Wilbur Sanders notes that the comic scene~ are mereq "the nin ot undirected triTollt7.•lO

other critics have made rooa for •ome treatment ot come~ when couidering the character of Doctor Faustus. In particular, Robert Ornstein preaen18 an argument quite re leTant to the T.1.ev which I expect to take ot Faustus. .l!ter stating that the •ironiat often deals in elaental absurdities-the absurdity- ot eating children to cure pc,Tert7 or of mortcaging one I s i111110rtal eoul tor a piece of ntton (it it be . 3

well roasted),• Ornstein argues that Marlowe's interest in providing clownish entertainment may be to reflect mankind's ridiculous situation within Ute's •comedy of !utilit7.•11 Marlowe's creation "depicts the corrupt~on of the mind that destroys the s~ul,"12 according to

Ornstein. For he views Faustus' contract !or "infinite power• to be as ridiculous as the Clown's contract tor "belly cheer"; both resµlt in damnation. In hie discussion of comedy at both the main and subplot level.8, Ornstein shows how their eventual coalescing produces a di!!erent

Faustus, no longer the exalted Scholar of the first part of' the pl.a7, but now •the figure of' a fool," vhose only difference !r0nt the ~clown. . . · 13 ia one of' degree, not ot kind.• Onq a f'ev years later, Bernard SpiTak examined some enigmatic figures vhich appear in Elizabethan drana and discovered at their core the conventional iiorallt7 Vice character.14 Spivak'~ dissatisfaction vi.th the usual evasive eriticima relating to Sbakeepeare1a villains provoked hi.a correlation o! the - ambiguous "intriguers• (1.e., Iago) vith the evolution of the morality's peraonitications.15 His study thoroughly explains the fusion of' both the virtues and the Vices from the old morality into one figure called the "Vice" in the developed morality. If we measure Marlowe's Faustus by Spivak1a rule, numerous parallels will be discovered: a virtuous

Faustus 18 first presented to the audience in the disguise of a tower­ ing intellectual and after much vacillation a Faustus is then shown who indulges in life's Vices; Faustus is both a passive and an active pereonallt:,; be disp~s sadness and mirth; through his constant

Tacillation and indecision concerning. repentance, he becomes the in­ triguer' wbo weaves continuity; and, with the fusion ot both virtues 4

and vices in his character, Faustus clear~ portrays the many racets ot mankind. The discovery that Faustus incorporates Vice character­ ~stics ultimately lessens his tragic stature and places him more properly as a close relati ve to Falstaff. When Marlowe contrasts Faustus• ear~ intellectual achievements with his later gluttonous and sensual desires, Faustus reveals himself as a comed1 an or low humor similar to Falstaft. J.B. Steane bas noticed Faustus' ambiguity and, specitical]J', the incongruity of the play's subject matter:

Instability is fundamental in the play-, as a theme and a characteristi c. Faustus is a play ot violent contrasts within a rigorous struc­ tural unity. Hilarity and agony, seri ousneus and irresponsibility: even on the most cautious theories or authorship, Marlowe ie responsible at times for all these extremes.lb

Here, Steane signitlcantly consi ders the opposing polariti es which alternate throughout the play: the •hilarity" as opposed to "agony" and the "seriousness" as opposed to "irresponsibility," further stating that Marlowe is responsible for the radical changes. Apparent­ ~. Steane accepts the humor as part of the original play.

Another major step toward seeing humor as integral to the role of Faustus has been made by David Bevington, who claims that misunder­ standing ot Faustus results trom an inadequate knowledge ot the Chris­ tian hom.iletic tragedy1a functional burlesque humor.17 The original Christian homiletic morality p~ consistently shows mankind 1a ultimate epiritual triumph over evil, whereas the later developed homiletic tragedy' shows his defeat in keeping with the CalTinist doctrine ot · 5

18 retribution. Bevington notes that the earliest drama in England

•contained in its phases o! comic and grotesque degeneracy the a­

terials !or a tragic solution."19 DiscUBsing the history ot the

Psychomachia--the allegorical conflict of man• s soul between per­

sonified good and. evil forces--Bevington a~ that above all else it waa •ccnnposed of a mixture of the serious and the grotesque."20

. Then, epeaking particular~ of the comedy in Faustus, he says that

the plq' s "comic scenes are not placed haphazardly"; they are part

ot an •established pattern ot alternation between edification and amusement.•21 Within the comic scenes, Marlowe presents burlesque

hlmlor which atreats Faustus• heinous sins satirical~, by exposing

them to grotesque exaggeration and caricature. Things terrible in

th91'118elves are made absurdly funny," . Bevington says, because "we · 22 are meant to laugh at evil aa Vl911 as !ear it." Bevington notes

that there is a "trace of the Vice in bis ~auatus ~ universaliied acquaintance with eTil and bis penchant for practical humor.•23 I

vi.ah to go beyond Bevington and show that Faustus .!.I the Vice; be

ia both his own tempter and bis own worst enemy.

Michael Goldman, stephen Greenblatt, and Edvard A. Snow present evidence which I think Rpports the idea that Faustus is a Vice character. Goldman claias Faustus is a dissembler in the first part

ot the play who tells himself to •be a divine in show,• but that Faustus ie impatient to discard his disguise-his •111&8k"-to allow 24 •torbidden sensations and thoughts" to e0111pletel7 ravish him. This

briet description is characteristic of the Vice who serves didactically while charging bis "moral instruction w1 th humor and theatrical ex­ c1tement."2S As a ~composite ot farce and high moral seriousneas,"26 t.he Vice i a alw~ anxious to be done with the serious and to delve into mirth and mischief'. Goldman interestingly percei vee the irony of Marlowe 1a moral warning (to the playgoer and reader) not "to practice• but "to wonder" only II at unlawful things" after the vi car­ ious empatb;y of the audience and ot the reader has already been ae­ tua~zed by means or the stage action.27 Greenblatt considers the

Marlovian hero as a physical being whose restless activity in time and -space creates a mocke1"7 o! the abstract being so.that .the !inal cumulative effect is "not ao much heroic as grotesquely comic, it we accept Bergson's classic de!inition of the comic as the mechanical

~ 26 imposed upon the living." Greenblatt then deecrib«!ls Faustus a.s fashioning himself' when repeating Christ's final words• "ConlJUfflnlat'llPII m•• Fauatua, by positing himself' "as God, then aa dying man" now culminates "hia fantasies or making an end"; and it makes a "dee1s1ve 29 boundar,- in his lite.• Relative to the Vice, we might aq that lergeon1a ~lan vital ot the Vice ia, or course, a personification ot both virtues and vices but it ia the action of the T.lcea vho provide t.he energy. Similar to the Vi<:e in the h;ybrid mora].$.ty pl~s vho re­ presented only the virtues in the exposition and only the vices in the remainder or the plq, Faustus will take upon himself a new Oest<­ fora. Just as the Vice character of the old morality deceitfully em• ployed evil bT insinuation into the "innocent" heart of mankind, ao alao has Faustus deluded himaelt into thinking that he can gain power OYer 7

hie own llaitationa. Playing the part of the Vice, Faustus nov tempts ld..mselt toward another directions the "forbidden." The passive, in­ active, •non-being" good scholar disguise is replaced by an active, •ev11• entertainer. Speaking Platonically, Greenblat t says Christ

!! the Idea, but Faustus is neither an Idea nor a form ot the Idea, he is only an illusion.JO Greenblatt, like Ornstein, sees a deeper level in the comedy ot Marlowe, whose plays "spurn and subvert his culture's metapby'sical and ethical certainties.31 For E. A. Snow, it is merely a matter of semantics to explain the plight ot Faustus: a word like •end" presents a di!f!'rent connotation to ~rsons of dit•. terent beliefe but taken in "Faustian discourse" depicts a Faustus vho ha.a a •blind spot• at his c~nt~r• .32 Snov traces vorda like "end11 and its cognates throughout the play to show Faustus' failures to posit •ends• aa a means to project himself into death and survi.Tal beyond it.. Snow uses 11 end11 to explore Faustus' ·consciousness of externals u •traah• and his inner sense ot "isolation, dislocation, and abstraction,•33 which causes Faustus to ~tea contract covering eve17 conceivable point (bod;,, soul, ~d spirit) because Fauatua can- not locate himself. Cognisant ot Marlowe's intent to portrq a · •nothing• neae at the heart,• and interpreting •o Fauatua, the7 are come to fetch aw,q t~ sou1e• as a cowardly err, Snow claims ve miss the point unless ve recognise the "gentle laughter~ that ahoQld issue tr011 this drama­ ti11ation ot 11 childlikeness," while Faustua st.111altaneou.sly aim.a at and dreads the end.34

Critic w. L. Oodshalk baa shown the degeneration of Faustus the Scholar to Faustus the Clown.3S Oocisbalk contends that •Faustus is in 8

the main a simple trickster," a "virtually harmless" figure who, tbrough ael.r-delusion, sells-"bis immortal jewel to becane a eanedi­ an."36 Turning his critical searchlight on Marlowe's play, Godshalk finds ironic parallels between both the main and the subplots, and the high and the low characters. Godshalk states that

The Master and the servants are one, for in a sense, Faustus's pretensions are as comic as the clowns' . What be performs with his magic does not seriously affect the world. .. . · He is an entertainer and a cheater or in­ competents. His tragedy is that he sell,s­ bis soul to become less than he was--a clown. In the end, Faustus reaches tragic reality through the comic mask.37

Focueing on salient points ::::-egarding Faustus' clownish actions, God­ shalk leaves unexplored the tact that the "mask" itsel! may be the reality.

It is 1q contention that Marlowe's Doctor Faustus has suffered too long as a 11 tragic11 character, and I hope at least to decrease the emp~is on his tragic stature to allow for recognition of the integral humor. I agree with 0odsbalk that Faustus becomes a clown, though my interpretation ct the cause creating the effect differs troa his. Ornstein'a view or Faustus, ae a "figure or a tool• in ecbolarly disguise, parallels my interpretation or Faustus aa a hybrid morality Vice character. I first see Faustus as a mental giant who baa attai.ned more than bis university colleagues, having

11&Stered not one but all four disciplines ottered at that time. While seeking more knowledge, the admirable. but restless Faustus impul.81velJ" 9

rejects all known knowledge (in itself a foreshadowing of the "figure ot a tool•) for that which is unknown, thus propelling himself into an expansive time and space where there are no cont rols. This happens once he pronounces his nselt-tashioning"38 decree t "Conmnmnatum !.!!•"

Bow taking a different direction evokes a behavioral change. When his intellectual "wings," i.e., his "spirit ot enquiry, which vas regarded aa fatal to the aoul,w39 melt, Faustus !alls and becomes a practical .

.joker. Perhaps we could or should specif'i.cally say his "idealistic" vings melt because Faustus continues to plq the role ot a scbolar- l ever interested in the field ot metaphysics, ete., e~c., ~t n~ he becomes more able to !ace reality, to accept both principles--the better and the worse-inber1'nt in mankind 1 s nature. Hie passive II good- ness• ie Combined with hiO aetiYe "badness" to create a character that is at once admirable though depraved. When the legal contract is con-

8tllllll&ted between Faustus and Mephostophilis, it becomes incumbent upon

Fauatus to become a character in lov comedy because vi thin the morality tradition comic effects are always tied in with the ,devil.

Much comic incident appears in Marlowe's play because it was in hi.a source. But the tact that he allowed it to remain mq indicate that it served his purpose well and 11 meshedN with the element·s from the 111orallty tradition. Although Marlowe borrows the motifs frcn bis source, !h! Historz !!!. !,h! D&mlable Lite ~ Deserved Death 2!. Doctor

~ Faustus, he uaually uses only' the genn of an idea and puts it into another context than used in the sowceJ the comedy' ot dismemberaent appears to be the same, but Marlowe manipulates this device metaphorically~ 10

ClJJllUlatively to add ironic dimensions, finally, to the fate ot Faustus.

The Faustbook was basically a serious moral narrative of a Doctor o! Divinity who refused repentance and was consequently damned.ho Mar- lowe appears to use this same pattern of repentance-refusal and dm,ma­ tion, but, actuali,-, it is only' an "appearance." Accepting the serious ideas, Marlowe changed them to suit his own purpose. He did this also with the comedy routines which. appear seemingly without change. F. P. Wilson reminds us that the "jests about the Pope's buffet, the. courtier's horns, the horse-corser [sicj who pulled Faustus' leg from his body, the ·forty-dollar horse that ·vanished when-ridden into the .water, and . . 41 the consumption of the load of hay" were all available. Marlowe alternates scenes of good a.'ld evil in which dismemberment incidents prepare C'Uffl\llatively for a not-so-tragic outcome. F~llowing Bevington•s lead, we must look at the morality tradition that existed before Marlowe to see whether there is anything present in it that would account for the structure and tone and the effects of Marlowe's Doctor Faustus. Strange~ enough the morality play--:tor the most part, a serious form of drama--employed several conventions which provided humor for its audience. One of the conventions, comic digres­ sions, seems to have originated from the essence of the morality, which ' culminates in victory for the good. Because the same actors played in both the good and the evil ~oles, and because the Tudor ·itinerant . hl troupes were economical~ limited in number, the device called "doubling• resulted. With the same actor portraying both a good and an evil torce, the doubling necessarily caused the dramatist to ere.ate a scenario alter-

.....; . ·.•. : 11

bating the scenes between the two polarities. Thus, the playwrights traditional~ utilized a scenic pattern portraying the passively good, or serious, intent, alternating with the actively bad, or canical, intent. h2 ioth deVices, doubling and alternating, used originally from necessity, became fil"!Tl~ established ingredients of the 1'!lorallty tradition, and they were uoed by dramatists even after the increased size of the troupes made them unnecessary.43 It was, then, through the essence o.t the morality w1 th 1ts symmetrical portrayal of both good and evil that it was established that evil forces had to follow good forces, on stage, and this eventuated in the cOJ!rl.cal .digre~si ons_. These comic digreasi ons then became important subplots to mirror the activity of the main plot. The evil canedy' in the comic digressions . ... ~ - . --.. - was made "absurdly tunny" to provide a satirical treatment o.t the sins ot the drama I s hero b;r "exposing them to grotesque exaggeration and caricature.nh4 As Spivak succinctly reminds us, "While the virtues talked, the vices acted, and by their physical exuberance and verbal pungency transmuted the pious monotony of the homily into the profane exciteJ11ent of the play."4' Another convention of the morality, dramatis personae allegori­ cally' representing the Vices, provided humor for the .audience. The morality's personifications for hwnor were forces of eTil: the Seven

Deadly Sina, and the many cohorts o.t the Devil. Parti.cularly comical was the dramatisation of the vices, often in the guise o.t the Seven

Dead~ Sins, who created humor by exaggerating the protagonist's heinous sins to the point of absurd! ty. The _s·even Dead~ Sins were •moral 12

personifications in allegor1cal competition for the human sou1.•46

These sins were in man I s nature J consequently, they usual~ provided the greatest caricature of the hero's degradation. Dangerous to mankind, 47 they caused him to becorn; bawdy' in his speech and actions. 4e

In turn, the audience experienced comic relief--tension was reduced _.. - and greater comical irony realized when the audience consciously par­ ticipated through laughter allowing the "unconscious" level to be 49 •iees deeply stirred." A thorough ana~sis by Spivak explains the purpose ot the Seven Deadly Sins in their "comic portrayal of evila as

the degradation by caricature of a dangerous enemy, and an anodyne, therefore, applied to fear and · pain. And the method or this degradation is at least twofold: as an image of frustration it ex­ pressed the essential impotence and vulnerability ot evil, comforting the Christian with the pleasing vision ot its defeat by God's will and its subjec­ tion to His purpose; as an image of baseness it allowed him contempt and laughter for the nature of evil by depicting it as rudely physical and bestial, a mirror of what is lowest, because le~st spiritual, in lruman nature and in the universe.50

It vas generally true that the Seven Deadly Sj ns were given express! on in the actions and speech of the declining hero so much the more as he eought relief from his frustration and pain while he progressively° became 1nore degraded. In actuality, the sins became the hero's anodyne, or relief.

The Devil, too, was among those vho presented humor in the morality plq. In the "Christian mytbos• as the arather 01' evil,"Sl he became .. an •historical figure ••• a fallen arch-angel, the anthropomorphic

Adversary."'2 According to Hartnell, he had become a figure or caidc 1)

stature Yhen the i nterpolation of comic scenes was presented during the liturgical drama ot the Middle Ages: the "greatest comic character was Satan himself, with attendant devils, who after the last scene of the Last Judgment gleefully shovelled the lost souls i nto the Hell­ Mouth.n5J Because the audience liked "comic byplay," it was not un­ common for the devils to wander about on stage intrudi ng on many a scene that they "had no busi ness to be in."$4 A. M. Nagler relates some rubrics .from the Jeu d 1Adam describing the antics of the devils with Adam and Eves "certain ones shall push them on, others shall drag· them" while "other devils" perform a "great dancing and ju[?i­

lation ••• shout ••• and dash together their pots and kettles," followed by running "to and fro. n$5 Such chaos on the stage contimi­ ally attributed to the evil forces was certain to create laughter when

the Devil and Ms cohorts appeared. The most important personage among the dramati s personae who be­ came the tocal point of humor in the later moralities was the "Vice"

character. He is such an important personage in the English drama that

we must give greater attenti on to him than to any other convention. Older scholars have not been in agreement in defining the Vice. Accord­ ing to E. K. Chambers, the interludes had a fool who .was a dramatic character also known as the "Vi ce"; thus, the terms "fool" and "Vice" may be used synonymously.S6 On the other hand, L. w. Cushman states that the Vice is "distinct .from t he clown and the fool."$7 However,·

both Cushman and CbamberaS8 seem to agree in recognizing the Y~ce as the character later called the "buffoon." Abou~ the buffoon, Susanne 14

Langer writes that he has "absurd expectations11 and he "is neither a good man nor a bad one, but is genuinely amoral. •• •S 9 Spivak re- solves this confusion by stati ng that the Vi ce

springs, by a century-long process or doct rlnal emphasls and dramatic spect alization, from the numerous v1.ces, includi ng the Deadly Sins, who C8ll'le upon t he morality stage out Of the diffzse homiletic allegory or medieval Christianity. 0

All human weaknesses, or vices, were fused into the vice character, according to Spivak. These vices, however, were not coequal. That Yi.ce which was most dO!llinant, having exercised itself fir~t and more strongly than the others, was known as the radix malorum-the vice to . 61 ~hi.ch all other vices were subjected. In the sixteenth century, we recognize the radix malorum as the vice who was "offered hondletically to the audience as ••• precedi.ng all others in the destructive assault of evil upon the heart of man, the true reli.g5.on, or the structure of society, dependtng on the didactic focus of the play,•62 as the anti• protestan~ Vice during the reign or Mary Stuart, and aa the anti-papal lice during the time of Elizabeth. The Vice was a personifi cation, according to Spivak, and, as such, he vas totally exempt .from punish­ aent and passion. The humor or the Vi ce springs fro~ the fact that he vas both a personification and ainoral-..that is 11 .free"--and could •supply the craving or the popular audience for something besides high 6 aeriousness.•63 This character then was the "leader and governor" 4 vbo was tound on the stage during the sixteenth century. After the

Reformation, this important character wore m&n7 different coatUJl8s to lS

aatist7 the audience. It was probably no small delight to a Protestant audience to see the Devil appear in the garb usually identi fied w1 th a

Franciscan Friar or a Rom.an Pope. Regardless of the cost\D1le, the Vice character can always be re­ cognized as the leading character whose personality regales the audience with both joy and sorrow. His role when "ead" always included the coin­ peneating counterpart of' joy. He was full or mirth with "his laughter, bis sotigs, his jests, bis fustian gabble, his uninhibited wlgarity, 6 and his rallying familiarity with the W011ten in the audi ence." S His rapport with the audi ence was one or the important ~amatu.rgic effects that create humor. According to Spivak,

His role, in consequence, opens itself up to an expanding variety of comic moti fs. He appears as a practical joker and clever fool, delighting his audience by hl.s satirical wit, his frequent grossness, bis antics (both physi cal and verbal), and aggve all by his consummate arti.stry i n de­ ceit.

As the leading character in the later II hybrid" morality67 -a develop­ ment following the Reformation which deals with secular matter--the Vice ia the comic who intimateq addresses his audience with

asides and monologues--wi tty, ironic, s~tiric, and • • • who reveals through his behavior bis allegorical origin and moti vatton, and who is still sufficiently a homileti c f i gure so that hie actions are !fttended to demonstrate bis name and nature.

Be baa a combination or both sadness and mirth; and the latter degenerates final~, in the hybrid 11orality, to c~c depravit7. 69 According to lb

len.ngton, the l'ice is "intended to be both admirable and yet de­ praved.• 70 He ia a metaphorical figure aa long 8.8 he acta in allegor­ ical drama. When bi.a • dramatic world is no longer a metaphor," the l'ice will change to meet the needs or the time.71 It bu been noted that the Vice character had changed in the

·~id• moralit7, which had developed after the Reformation when the 11orality plays became an important political and religious

propaganda voice. The dramatic formula for this new hybrid, or

bamiletic tragedy, prov:l.ded tor comic scenes that were longer and more vivid than the serious, and th~ contained more . vari~d c~ae­ ters • which resulted in a "Jl'lounting eznphasis upon th! failings or . 73 ·manJd..nd, rather than the triuraphs," vi th a predOMinant satiric tone.

Tims, ve can see that the drama form changed and developed according to the needa ot a new generation. lapecial~ during the 1560's and the 15701s, the homiletic tragedy vith its concept ot mixed dr8JU takes on new meaning. It is drama with •-n.cious behavior• that "is at once~ and terrifying as a spectacle, admirable and yet grotesque, amusing but also edifying as a perverae dist.Ql'Uon or moral behavior" wherein the canic· licentiousness produced 74 its own catastrophe. Thia drama presented a gamut .of situationa

traa the extremely acceptable good to the ext.N!fte~ unacceptable ev.i.l

encountered by mankind f'rOlll birth to death. Pla.yvrigbta developed

scenarios requiring two protagonists to represent each segment, and these tvo were later fused into one protagonist--the Vice--with a dual

pereonality. ?S The factor which detendned the content of these dramas vaa audience approval, and the audience had a preference ten: hurncn:.

Ttda helps to explain the above noted statement thAt these dr8JT1&8 have longer and more varied comic scenes than those in the past. It also brings us again to the important humorous figure, the Vice charac­ ter. During the latter part of the sixteenth century, the Vice charac­ ter was still "on stage" while most of the other dramatis personae and . . the entire apparatus of the •old" morality had disa.ppearedJ the nev dr8Jlla incorporated the already mentioned politi cal and religious the?nes and needed a protagonist to act out its propaganda. So the Vice cbarac- . . . . ter robed himsel! in the latest costume of the Court dandies, took upon · 76 hblsel! a man's name, and stepped upon the boards, to become a charac- ter who v&a difficult to explain: whether a figure who had on a uniform or the soldier, or royalty, of historical tame, or ot legendary tame.

Ho longer was the protagonist !ought over by' the vices and the Virtues because they were incorporated into this one "intriguer" whose "protean nature and devious bistory"77 allowed him to portray both the good and the ml found in the human nature o! all mankind. According to Benng­ 78 ton, this character was a !1.gure of eternal d8.l'IIJ'lation, a.tter the Calvinist doctrine ot determinim was spread. But, in actuality, the 'Yice character was a composite o! eo maey variables that it is best not to designate hilft1 perhaps, as a particular figure unless to sq that he was a figure or ambiguity. In addition to the items already mentioned• certain conventions ot presentation helped to create an atmosphere of hum.or in the moralit7. 18

Sounds were important: JllU8iC and thun.der accompanied the descent ~ gods; the striking or a clock aroused suspense and denoted passage of 79 time. Devils a-opeared on stage with the fireworks which were a reg- 80 ular part o! their perfomance. Stage properties and equipment were used to evoke humor: separate parts of the human anatorrt7 when an actor 81 was dismembered--"the property bead wa.~ overworked;" special costUMes 82 worn as a disgu.i.se !or invisibility; mechanized equipment to open ~he jaws o! the Hell..Mouth,83 allow thrones to descend,84 and convey dragons 8 through the a1r. '

Although JnaD7 critics have commented on Marlowe.• s use o! t~e morali­ ty play or morality pla;y traditions, they have neglected to.note that this tradition contalns J11Ueh comic event or characterization. looking at Marlowe• s play- with this in mind, we can tfnd a justificat:1.on for the inclusion o! the comic interludes and, indeed, for the pree:rrlnence of comic antics on the part ot the "tragic" hero. Indeed, the ccm.c bebavior--even clowning--of Faustus finds a· theroatic justifjcation as part ot the portray-al ot the Tice character. As we continue to look at the morality tradition we find ¥.arlove'a justification for the "Gargantuan" amount of comedy in a plq that is 11 tragic.'' The old conventional morality was an allegorical presentation, as has already been noted. The roles presented in this older tradition were staged in a metaphorical dramatic world. This meant. the roles were not characterizations or real persons; they were merely personifications.

Aa a personification, the hero had a freedom not possessed by characters in later drama who portrayed real persons. 19

Alr$ady alluded to in regard to their exemption troui punishment, these heroes of the old convention were without the passions or joy, anger, sorrow, etc., which are realized by actual beings. The heroes in this old convention could "express themselves as moved by resentment, aml?ftion, hatred, professional and sexual jealouey, but t hey do not 86 behave as it they were so moved." Thus, the heroes trm this old tradition were untouched by the situations in which they found themselves even though they appear to have some feeling about a particular inc:.dent. These heroes do not become desperate when thei r aspirations are not ful­ filled; the appearances which they present can be most deceiT.lng in s1:1ch . . cases and are seldom-if ever, followed by any drastic action. Seeking

high ambitions and failing to attain them is not a hindrance to the attitude o! these ber<>t'!s. They are easily' grati fied~ U they despair,

they find it easy to regain composure. Marlowe uses the old morality tradi tion aa a dramatic frame tar

bis plq and uses the protagonist from the same tradition when be paints as an innocent Scholar mastering all the disciplines which are offered at the university. On~ after becoming a master ot logic, medici ne, la.v, and theology, does Marlowe's Faustus receive his Doctorate in

Div.tnity. Though Marlowe aggrandizes his Faustus b;y .these intellectual

achievements, he also undercuts the Scholar's accanplishlllents through humor. Marlowe's creation will stage both principles ot mankind's nature and we hear the chorus recite a toreshadowing ot another aspect ot the Doctori 20

, swolne with cunn1ng, ot a selfe conceit, Hie waxen wings did mount aboue hie reach, And melting, heauens conspir1 d his ouer-throw: For falling to a deuellishGX ercise, (sicl And glutted now with learnings golden gifts, He surfets vpon cursed Necromancie. (B-17-25) 87

This allusion to Icarus is a mocking comparison that creates a humoroua image (aa well as the usually cited rebellious image). Juxtaposing the image ot a vise scholar "excel),.ing all" (Prologue.B-18) with the iraage of a foolish boy whose "waxen wings" tlrst helped him to "mount," but, soon •melting," caused him to tall through the air, undermines the central character I s dignity i nmediately. . Like Icaru~, borne by wings which tailed him, Faustus has ascended and is destined to fall. Through the dramatic irony ot the Prologue, the playgoer is made aware ot Faustus' future "damnation," but the aspiring Faustus is unaware of the situation. Marlowe has implanted a contradictory image in the minds of the audiencei an intellectual type and, evidently, a humorous type. Marl

point has been centered upon the intellectual sphere to the exclusion of all else. a,.s .first soliloquy, though usually considered a serious piece

ot poetry by Marlovian scholars, may seem to paint a caricature of a .flighty Faustus who frivolously rejects all collected knowledge. I,nagine the Lord Admiral's Men's chief actor, Edward Alleyn, broad~ exaggerating as he sayss

Sweet Analitikes, tis thou hast rauisht me.

The word "rauisht," used by Greg in, both the A and the I texts, . connotes . . one's delight with the p}Grsical. This choice o.f words--in a section which is de.finitely designat ed as Marlovian-presents a man who can be seduced by what is normally thought to be one of the most arid sectiom ot Aristotle's works. It is ironical that Faustus thinks his ability

to dispute logically has achieved its tull potential; it is just this

inadequacy which will cause bis downfall. But he thinks that "a greater

8Ubiect t.itteth Faustus wit," (sic] and bids the subject of being and non-being "farewella (I.i.B-39-41). According to Michael Goldman, Faustus ie successful in his attempt to bid "being farewell, but not nonbeing."90 Then in the next .few lines, Faustus boasts ot the "bills" that are •hung-up as monuments /'Whereby whole Cities baue escap'd the plague/ And thousand desperate maladies beene cur'd". (I.i.~46-48). Yet, he decides that the profession of medicine is not "to be esteem'd" (I.i.B-2$), sillply:because he can not raise men from the dead as Jesus did Lazarus. Humor-*B.bsurd hwnor--has been created because Faustus• reasoning is so 22

absurd. Faustus now turns to the legal professton for consideration, bnt just as quickly decides that it "f'its a drudge, / Who aims at nothing but external trash" (I.i.1-60-61). It is ironical th&t

Faustus takes euch a radical attitude in designating "externals" as

•trash" since be has, in the past, dedicated himself to the study o! externals, and, in the future, will continue to abandon himself to that which is external, foreshadowing his end when he himselt will 91 be nothing but the "mere external trash he scorned." · Faustus then impulsively decides that Divinity is best, ·and continues•

StiR!3ndium peccati, ~ estt ha, stioendium, The reward of sin is deat~ that's hard: Si peccasse, negamus, fallimur, rnilla est in nobis veritas: n we say that we haue no sinne We deceiue our selues, and there is no truth in vs. Why then belike we must sinne, And so consequently die, I, we J1U8t die, an euerlasting death. What doctrine call you this? Che~, .!!!!:!: What will be, shall be; Diuinitie adeiw. {r.1.1-66.76)

Faustus bids divinity "adeiv" just eleven lines after he has declared that divinity is best. One need not see this enacted to realize the humor arising frOM such an uncertain, indecisive, vacillating man.

Li.ke Humpty Dumpty, he leans first one vay, then another. Having chosen divinity, or •white magic" 88 best, only 8 few lines later he leaves it for that which is its opposite, necromancy, or "black 111agie.• Fauatus formulates a logical fallacy deleting from his premises God's love and mercy, therefore arriving at a false conclusion that he must ain because be is eliJllinating all posai billtj es ot God• s love and God' a aerey trom his lite. Because Faustus ha.a created a syllogistic error, 2)

be will now inte11Bely follow the steps to his personal ndanse macabre"92

and the i dea that either way--with or without repentance--he wil l die; ~austus is incapable of transcending mankind's existential dilermna.

Even though "bills" have been hung as "monuments" to his fame, his

"Renaissance melancholy"-the idea of life's futi lity-wi 11 continue to haunt FaustU8 and to thrust him ever forward toward an anodyne which will alleviate his fear or death. ·Recall that Marlowe has in­

formed the audience that Faustus is "glutted ••• w:I. th learnings golden

gifts" (Prologue.B-2.3). The only knowledge that Faustus has n6t acquired is the "Metaphisicks of Magitiansn (I.i.B-75), which he

immediately equates with 0 heauenly" (B.76) infonnati on. Bis deter­

mination to fulfill bis desires through the practice of r.ecromancy propels Faustus to a fri volous rejection of knowledge that he has learned in the past.

In the next scene, Marlowe intensifies the vacill ation of Faustus

by presenting the Good and the Bad Angels which he borrowed from the morality tradition. As the Daimon--conscience--of Faustus, they make visible the two polarities of Faustus' personality. The solemn and "theatrically inert"9.3 virtuous preacher, the Good Angel, attempts to dissuade Faustus, but he hears his contrasting person:1.fication, the Bad Angel, outspokenly decla.tm: "Go forward, Faustus" (I.i.B-100); and Faustus chooses to follow his Bad Angel. The vacillation in Faustus'

JD.nd occurs because be desires more knowledge, and the Good Angel could

only mouth what was acceptable !or that period in t i me. Robert Ornstein

reminds us that we "see the world through the lenses of customs when false values pass current, even elemental truths appear distorted, naive, or absurd."94

l:n the prologue, Marlowe described an intellectual who had ac­ quired all known knowledge and who was still seeking for knowledge to tulfill--or satisfy, his desi res, even if he must seek that which wae the unknown or forbi dden "Magicke.11 The important point to be consid­ ered is that almost any UNKNOWN was believed to be "evil," and "re- 9; garded as tatal to the soul," that is, unless it was an unknown acceptable to those in authority (in the church). The "l'.agicke" that was performed by the church was "good." Knowledge ~r "magicke" that would }:under the traditional beliefs was all "evil." Given the spiritual and intellectual capacity ot Doctor Faustus, one can BYJll• pathize with his earnest desire to s~ek the summum bonW'll. Thus !ar, he seems to have been a victi m of "ever learni.ng and never (bei ng] able to come to the knowledge of the truth."96 He has never reached the sublimity and serenity of truth which he thinks that he wi 11 f i nd in magic. A true Renaissance man, Faustus is seeking his individual fulfillment. During the period when Marlowe wrote Doctor Faustus, a marked delineati on between magic and science had not yet occurred. . 97 Faustus, having found religion meaningless and WJ.thout hope, now selects another direction. By his own ambition, by his own free choice, Faustus has decided on a career in the "forbidden" area.

Faustus had previous~ talked about it with his two friends and now

~ tells them: "Gentle friends aid me in this attempt" CI.i.B-133).

Be is serious when he succumbs to the study of black magic for a greater 25

learning experience; but it is a hubristic personality which we realize bursting into full bloom when he sa:ys i

And I • • • Wi 11 be as cunning as Agrippa was, Whose shadow made all Europe honour him. (I.i.B-134-11.iO)

This self-comparison with the famous historical figure shows Faustus' aovement from a seeker of more truth to a seeker of fame and renown.

According to Ellis-Fermor,

Partly in the recklessness which is the natural reaction from his former patience, partly in the desire for consolation, he abandons the systematic search for that final understanding the desire for which has led him .forward, yet eluded him, all his life, ~d plunges defiantly into the practice of magic.9

s , ·: _To embrace evil, Faustus l!!g to do "comic" things, given the tradition of the morall ty. The sensual aspect has already begun to emerge frOIII Faustus' stage personality and will soon overshadow the intellectual. It should be noted that from the moment Faustus re­ jected traditional theological theories, there bas been a decided change in his thought processes. In lines omitted from the Quarto B-1616 text, the audience has heard Faustus says

Diuinitie is basest of the three, Ynpleasant, harsh, contemptible and vi.lde ••• (A-142-143)

Harlowe has hinted through line8 such as these the subconscious aspect

~ Faustus that now emerges in the third scene when Faustus openly invokes the appearance of the devils. . 26

In recalling that the Vice character or the morality tradition vas connected always vith comic e.fi'~cts, one begins to see the ex­ trinsic change in Faustus. Before Marlowe's incantation scene begins, we hear the sound of thunder. This is usualcy symbolical of the

11 99 "descent of the gods ; but whenever Marlowe has the sound of thun­ der in his Faustus stage directions, it is symbolic or the presence ot devils. Marlowe does not have just one devil, but he writes a stage direction for five-~.!\\. . The devils are on stage, and the audience now knows that this means something comical is about to take place. Thia is what they have been ·waiting· for, and vith relish they v~tch

Faustus draw the magic circle that is supposed to protect the ma• gician from evil. The scene is full of irony. The devils are already perched above the xheavens" as Faustus prepares to invoke their pres­ ence; Faustus believes that his drawn "characters" will inforce the spirits "to rise;" he steels himself to "fear not," to 11be resolute;" he is using names of saints and figures of heaven to invoke the pres­ ence ot a. devil; and, the thorough-going irony is the sight of this towering intellectual going through all the rigamarole to conjure a devil oncy to demand that (vhen appearing) be leave and return in the guise of a Franciscan Friar.

The spectacular merriment on stage is superabundant: when the drunners sound the thunder, Mepbostophilis appears, followed by the devils vho begin to make more noise vith their squibs as they run back and forth, in and out, creating a merry time tor everyone on stage and in the audience. Instead or showing any exhilaration at 27

the sight of Mephoatophilia, Faustus immediately rebukes him:

I charge thee to returne, and change thy shape. (I.ii.B-2SO) and preSUJnptuoua Faustus gloats:

I see there's Tertue in rrr:, heauenly words. Who would not be protic:i.ent in this Art? How pliant is this Mephostopbills? '-' Full ot obedience and bumi lity, . Such is the force of tlagicke, and nrr spels. (I.iii.B-255-259)

Faustus has become enamoured of bis own tricks and actually believes that he is in charge of Mephostophilis, ignoring f or . a while th., truth that the conjuring was not the sole reason of his appearance.

When Faustus uttered 11 Valeat ffllJl!en triplex Iehovae!" (aAway with the three-told spirit of Jehovah"), be had blasphemed against the TrinityJ and this autmatical.ly invoked the presence of devils, it was believed. Since the presence ot devils on stage was tied to comic effects, the action seems to imply an attempt by Marlowe to lampoon traditional religion. Also, since the magic helps to create Faustus• downfall,

Marlowe seems to lampoon the counter-culture, i.e., black magic.

To cry- "away" with the dogma of Tri nity lampoons trad:it:i.onal religion.

Though this dogma could not be proven, it had gripped the Minda ot men and women and hindered their •tree" thoughts of God's majesty. Using so-called saints• names and figures of heaven to invoke the presence of devils and comedy is a further lampoon on traditional religion. ld.kevise, Marlowe's ironical fashioning ot Faustus I voicing

a belief in the "vertue" ot his vorda (e.g.,the_ abilit7 to create a 28

•pliant• attitude in Mephostophilis and to colllll&l\d hie •obedience and hund. lit,j"), lampoons the counter-culture and helps to show the tallaey

ot pl&cing faith in the counter-culture. But Marlowe never lampoons

Faustus' desire to learn; throughout the play, Marlowe allows the spirit ot inquiry complete and uninhibited license. Marlowe presents

Faustus and Mephostophilis in a continuous dialectic regarding hell;

thq are often heard discussing astronomical theories ot the universe; they do not reach definite conclusions since answering all Faustus'

questions was an i!dpOssibility-Marlowe did not know the answers

(and even "today no one understands how the world functions11100).

But Marlowe was concerned with metaphysical queetions which

traditional culture answered wi. th absolutee. Kenneth Borke reminds

ua that •m;ytha are grounded in beliefs. And beliefs are 'myths I to 101 , . whoever doesn't believe them." Using this idea as a basis to

explore some of the subtle relationships between the beliefs postu­

lated bT Faustus and the actions performed by him on stage, we can

.formulate a Faustian "theology," or "mythology.• His doctrine includes

a belief in the naagiclan as a II Dem:i-goda (I .i .B-88) J he holds the

principle that Beelzebub is the Prince (I.iii.B-280-28)); he declares

that hell is "m Elizium• (B-285) and •mens [sic;] soules• are vain

t.rifles (B-287); he contra.ct.a to "be a spirit in tol'.1')8 and substance•

(II.1.B-488), so he believes in a spiritual world; he thinks "Bel's a table• (II.i.B-519); he believes in joys ot heaven but he does not

particular~ believe heaven-the universe-was made tor man; he sa7Bs •l! hea-n,n vas made tor man •••" (B-580). He believes God wu the 29

creator of the world (II.ii..B-643) and we know that his God has been divested of love and mercy. Therefore, with little or no internal

joy-, Faustus is eager to be through with the first part of his life,

to nmake an end immediately" (II.i.B-460). His final words when

J signing a twenty-f'our--year contract with Mephostophilis are: "Consummatum est" (II .1 .B-462). His imagination has seen words on ~s arm and his blood has congealed, but 'Faustus· determines to "go forward, n to throw off bis disguise and to live. Arriving at bis

first day of life to cOlllll'lence formerly' unknown experiences, Faustus

believes that be exists in time-space, at least, for twenty.four

years, during which Marlowe will--in the pla:y--"contain him, con-

centrate hira, 'dramatize' him. nl02 According to E. A. Suow,

Contingency and flux are trans.formed into "tl\Y f atall t ime,11 death from one moment among maey into "thine houre," the 11 finall ende" toward which all points and rushes. uEncilessness" is thus a matter ot crucial ambivalence for Faustus s if it is the goal that he pursues, it often seems in turn precisely what be is fleeing from. "0 no end is limited to damned eoules11 can be taken as a phenomenological definition ot damnation for Faustian consciousness, and not jur.t as an article of .fai th concerning the nature of existence in hell. The torm of' the expression makes ends and limitedness feel like things that are bestowed upon you, like grace •••• Without the imposition ot llmi ts, real or i maginary, there could be no striving, straining, aspiring, trans­ gressing, or overreaching-and this would surely be bell for the Faustian sensibility.103

For a while then, through means ot the contract, Faustus bas posited tor himself a •consciousness•--a seltJ and, after this sell-induced

action, he has hopes that he will live endleseq, 1.•., through bis dalnation. 30

Marlowe has shown a Faustus of serious m1 en during the first part of the play who had been "acted upon" in spite of his attempt to induce the action himself. Presumably, bis entire environment and education precluded a total freedom of choice since it was customar­ ily oriented toward predeterm:inism:, · a view that binds one to a self­ destructive obedience. In his impatient determination to "leuel at the end," we saw in Faustus "a growing _awareness of static self­ imprieonment; the gestures of an insatiable thirst for the profound gradually betray th(· existence of a grasp that turns everything it touches into •external trash. ,nl04 His training has propelled Faustus to view the world as "trash" and his peysical being as sinful. In his flight of fantasy to overcome temptation of his appetitive nature, he first fell prey to logic. Faustus the Scholar was first "seduced"

("rauisht" I.i.B-3.5) b;y logic; then he was seduced ("rauisht" I.i.

B-132) by the thought of studying magic; and now we will see him seduced by bis own nature. He is bis own worst enemy as he tempts himself and desires to feed upon the gluttonous spirits of the Seven

Deadly Sins. \ -~ Marlowe exposes the comic character of i'austus during his exami- nation of the Seven Deadly Sins "in their owne proper shapes and llkenesse11 (II .ii .B-671). Faustus announces that this "sight will be as pleasant ••• as paradise was to Adam the first day or his crea­ tion" (B-673-674). Since the viewing of sins in their true hideous ehapes will be pleasant to Faustus, this dialogue is a clue to two things: 1 t previews the forth-caning comed;y ,· and the simile implies 31

that this is the first day of Faustus• creati on. What does t his mean? It means that Faust us is going to remove his scholarly dis­ guise and expose another aspect o! himself: -not only i s he a solemn, studious scholar; he is also a joyful, mirthful ro.i schiei'-maker. He is a Vice cbaract·er out of the old morality traditi on, and it has been with impatience that be has worn his "mask" of "exalted appear­ ance."105 Even though there have been no stage directi ons or dialogue indicating that Faustus has changed either his "shape" or his costume, a change will soon be evident to the playgoer. Having left the lofty heights of the ivory tower, this intellectual now f i nds time to listen to the absurd wants and complaints of the Sins. As he queri es the first Si n l n the parade, Pride discovers her disposition to Faustus. Like Pride, Faustus, too, would enjoy the iti nerary of Ovid I s flea. After Pride, Covetousness, Envy, and Wrath tell their i nsipid little tales to Faustus, Gluttony requests a dinner invitation. Faustus' refusal provokes Gluttony to say: "The deuill chooke thee." Th& audience hears Faustus say: "Choke thyself Glutton" (II.ii.B-72)). Certainly, this is not the speech ot a scholar "graced with Doctor's name." The appearance of the Sins and Faustus on stage together means that the main plot bas reached its II symbolic center," lOS according to

Zucker. Faustus now• •reeds' ••• and jests with • • • bogies of the superstitious mind,n according to Ornstein, and he is "entranced by ~cifer's vaudeville show." 107 Faustus reacts to the "sillinessa with the "naive, egocentric delight or a child," according to E. A. Snow, who senses a "nothingness" at the heart of the "Faustian egotism.nl08 This is the point at which Faustus' inner being is • now reflected openly on stage by the Sins who relate tlwi r "bitter and petty frustrations"--each by a foolish, absurd, nonsensi cal speech which "suggests Faustus' own futility.nl09 Their fatuousness is acceptable to Faustus; thelr stupidity provides a risible situation through the cooperation of Faustus. Faustus has changed his shape, and he is not only on. stage with the low comedians, he is acting with them and talking with them; more specifically he is losing bis admi­ rable qualities and declining to their level. After the Pageant of the Seven Deadly Si ns, Faustus claims "this si ght doth delight my soule (II.11.B-131). Is this the noble-minded Scholar speaking? Yes, he is still in the scholar's costume ·when he speaks this line; but, after accepting a book from Lucifer, Faustus informs the audience that he will be able to turn him-"selfe into what shape" (B-737) he might desire--another lampoon on the. counter-culture because we will find that Faustus can not change his shape when he wishes to turn his body into air (B-2164). However, he~ change shape when he dons the red robe of the Cardinal and, later, "becomes" invis:f.ble.

In most of the clowning scenes we can see two patterns

in the main plot. The dramatic handling allows the playgoer to hear

Wagner parodying Faustus and attempting to speak logically with the aschollere" who "wonder what's becane of Faustus that was wont to make our schooles ri ng, with sic probo" (I.ii.B-190-191). Thus, the earlier "Si llogismes" (I.i.B-133) of Faustu:5 are mocked by Wagner,

who tails as miserab)J as does Faustus. Agai n parodying the main plot, Wagner attempts to coerce the Clowne i nto being his servant. The ribald language and jests of the Clowne entertai n the audience while Wagner begins to threaten that he will tear the Clowne "in

peeces" (I.iv.B.360). It is the same thr!;tat given by Mep~ostop~lis . to Faustus. Wagner's ability to conjure successfully two d~vils

(I.iv.B.374) is a dramatic rneans used by Marlowe to show that anyone

can conjure a devil if he is evil; and Wagner's threat of dismember­ ment is a !oreshadowi.ng of Faustus' future. These relati ve)J short comical digressions have been alternati ng with the "scholarly" serious

scenes and have provided the audience with a relief from the tension

caused b;r Faustus' conflict. In tha third scene of the second act, Robin and Dick's clowning is important for several reasons. It functions first as a parody of Faustus' forfeiture or his previous achievements to ~cquire the

magician I s power to conjure. Robin bas somehow managed to procure a magician's book; we see him draw the magic circle and begin an

incantation, elowly--since be ha:J difficulty reading the instructions. Harlowe reminds the audience through Dick ' s dialogue that Robin is an illiterate rustic. Nevertheless, his ·conjurati on later (in III,iii.B:-ll60) successful~ brings Mephostopbilis frOIU Constantinople to turn Robin and Dick into an ape and a dog, respectively. We hear, too, Robin jokingly promise Dick "a paire of hornes" (II.iii.B-760), which is a foreshadowing of Faustus' future acttons. Reiteration or Pride's previous description ot Ovid's flea becomes a confession when Robin confesses to Di.ck that he, Robin, already has caused Dick to wear those horns. Another important function of this scene is to include. the usual comedy fare so common to the morality in its grotesque and base form. Marlowe is simply following the normal pattern that had become a tradition in English drama. Last, but perhaps not le~t,

Robin's promise will occur in the future, and they will have a !ree

DTauerne" (II.iii .B-771) trek when they will "not pay one peey for it" (II.iii.B-773), afforded through the magical a.rt of Faustus (in IY.vii.B-1763-1769).

The dramatization or a not-so-tragic central figure takes place first in the episodes depicting travels. Faustus' curiosity_ to eee "bright resplendent Rome" (III.i.B-8.50-851) provides an unexpected and unseen audience with the Pope. First, Faustus dons the red robe of the usually fat Cardinals and succeeds in his comically ironic impersonation. Faustus now parodies hie own actions. in the first part of the play'. It is "travest7 or a high order," according to Ornstein, who states that

more correct~, as Faustus changes shape the tragic - comic contrast begins to coalesce. Scene by scene the apposing (~j images approach one another until at la.st we discover 3S

beneath the exalted appearance of the fearless rebel the figure of .a fool. When Faustus steals the Pope's cup and Robin steals the Tintner•s goblet the tragic and comic images nearly merge.110

Further, the "difference between hero and clown is one of degree, not of kind.nlll In Faustus then we have ~imultaneously a scholar and a clown but the clown emerges only after h~ has succumbed to his own •temptation" through the Angels--his Daimon. After bis deceptive role as Cardinal--deception being a typical trait of the Vice charac­ ter-wherein he "seduced" the Pope through his dissimulation, Faustus changes cost'lDlles for the robe of 11 invisibility" and participates mischievously in Peter•s feast. Faustus talces the Pope's food, steals bis wine, threatens-then boxes his ears, and, in general, makes a fool of the Pope and himself. · Another successful seduction! Here again Faustus seems to have all the characteristics of the Vice: he is successful in dissimulation, seduction, and intrigue, capable of providing both sadness and mirth for his audience. He has indeed AND in deed become a clown. There is no other way to describe such antics as he b::s perfomed in the presence of the Pope.

·' ·Here, Marlowe begins to show us shades of the comic-evil magician appearing in greater depth vi th each progressive episode. Later, Marlowe uses the Benvolio episode to reveal fully the depravity ot

Faustus, who has become well-known in his career and visits as a performer before the court of Charles Vat Innsbruck. During his performance, Faustus encounters a Knight, Benvollo, who disbelieves the magician's power. Something more than comedy is inherent in the attitude of Faustus in relation to Benvolio who, rather jokingly says:

I,I, and I am content tooi and thou bring .Alexander and his Paramour before the Emperour, Il'e be Acteon, and turne rrry sel!e to a Stagge. . (IV.11.B-1286-1288)

Glaring at Benvolio, Faustus replies: "And Il'e play Diana, and send you homes presently" {IT.ii.B-1290-1291). Faustus out of re­ ~nge tor Benvolio's scepticism places horns on Benvolio and leaves therl there for an indefinite period. Especially humorous is Faustus' denial when asked Benvolio:

Zounds Doctor, is this your villainy?

Faust. 0 say not so sir: the Doctor has no skill, No Art, no cunning, to present these Lords, Or bring before this royall F.mperour The mightie Monarch, warlicke Alexander. Ir Faustus do it, you are streight resolu1d, In bold Actons shape to turne a Stagge, And therefore my Lord, so please your Ma.iesty, Il1e raise a kennell of Hounds shall hunt him so, As . all bis f ootmanship shall scarce preuai le, . To keepe his Carkasse tram their bloud;y phangs. · (IV.ii.B-1338-1347)

Benvollo has been seduced by Faustus, and he .lias been .made a believer in Faustus• magic; so, he hollers "hold, hold" to Faustus when he begins to call up tba devils. The F.mperour attempts to entreat Faustus to re­ move the horns, while being at the S8Jl\e time delighted tor such a mirth­ ful pertonnance. But the horns remain. Faustus reprimands Benvolio to •1ooke you speake well ot Schollers" {IT .ii.B-1360). But angry Ben­

TOlio plots revenge, a complication which leads to the partial diSDtem­ berment ot Faustus. )7

As has already been noted in the discussion of the morality . . play1s conventions, dismemberment is a comical effect; it has been used by Marlowe to good advantage. Marlowe uses this separation of a character•s bead, arm, or leg to show the gradual build-up to the finale when Faustus is completely dismembered. Marlowe allows the idea of dismemberment to grow slowly. Beginning with only a stab in the arm (B-420), Faustus proves his love to Mephostopbilis. Next,

Benvolio plots revenge to "baue his Fs:ustus1 head" (IV .iii.B-1411), and boasts that "this blow ends all" {IV.iii.B-1414). In a spec­ tacular scene, Benvolio and his friends knock off the head of Faustus and are wholly amazed to realize he is alive "agen" (IT.111.B-J.443). When Frederick wants the head returned, Faustus demurs, saying, "Nay, keep i t 11 (IV .iii .B.141.i5). Faustus himself gives us a clue to his limited existence, as he continues:

Knew you not Traytors, I was lim1.tted For foure and twenty yeares, to breathe on earth~ And bad you cut my body with swords, Or hew'd this flesh and bones as small as sand, Yet in a m.i.nute had my spirit returned And I had breath' d a man made free from harme. (IV .iii.~1447-1452)

(And the phrase "free from harme" is also a direct explanation ot his final act of dismemberment as Vice.) The ambush by the Knights against

Faustus• life is a wild scene with soldiers on stage while the drums are beating and the devils are running around shooting oft fireworks. All the soldiers and Benvolio have "faces bloud;y, and besmear'd with JDUd and durt; all haui ng homes on their heads" (rf.iv.B-l.489.1491). .38

An event that started out as a mere joke by Benvolio has turned into a really bloody farce. The revenge theme certatnly seems out of proportion to the deed, but it has been a lively effect to keep the attention of his aud:ience--one of Marlowe's objectives. Tied in with this objective, of course, is his character's degeneration. The former admi.rable Scholar has turned into a corrupt fellow whose schadenfreude--a malicious joy in response to the discomfiture of others--has become apparent. But having fulfilled thi.s assignment in his role of Vice, Faustus returns to the lighter stde of mischief, leaving the Knights with horns on thei r heads as they ret;reat ~n shame to the country. Without the depth of real passion peculiar. only to human beings, Faustus totally forgets them and the terrible threats to his life.

There is only mirth as Faustus finds another vi.ctim to seduce.

This time it is the Horse-courser from whom Faustus received forty dollars for a horse which turned into hay. The ·Horse~ourser who wishes reimbursement f5nda Faustus sleeping, and, in an attempt to awaken him, pulls off r~s leg--another case of dismemberment. Faustus hollers: "O help, help, the villaine hath murder'd me •••• ·stop him, stop him, stop him---ha,ha,ha, Faustus hath his leg againe, and the

Horse-courser a bundle or bay" (IV.v.B-1563-1568). The final dismem­ berment of Faustus is once again foreshadowed.

Still entertainjng, Faustus is now at the Duke of Anholt's where he builds castles in the air and supplies a dish of "sweetest grapes" (IV.vii.B-1673) for the Duchess, when suddenly the Clown and other 39

minor vice characters are knocking and calling for Faustus. Finally,

Faustus is in an ordinary tavern again seducing by casting spells to charm the Clowns and the Horse-courser as each attempt to accuse him. When the hostess requests remunerat1.on for the service and she too i s spell-bound, it seems that Faustus has turned into an ordi nary cheat. The diS!'t\emberment motif is mentioned again after Faustus en­ counters the old man, and Faustus repents. This causes Mephostophilia to threaten Faustus with disr.iemberment of' his flesh "in peece-meale" for "disobedience"' (T.i.B-1848-1849). Therefore, it appears that either Faustus is to be tort~ed .(i.e. by the devils) if he repents,

or he will be damned (i.e. by the traditional religion, both Roman Catholic and Protestant) it he does not. Either alterna~.;i ve embodies tutility--a sense that Faustus has all along been doomed to expire (i.e. since his decision to reject the traditi onal culture and to

accept the counter-culture). Yet Faustus has seemed to have a choice whenever the Good Angel and the Bad Angel have appeared.· Through their appearances which have masked the reality of Faustus' doom,

Marlowe seems to be satirizing the prominent Calvinist doctrine of'

determinimn. 'what seems also to surface is the absurdity of mankind's

preoccupation with the end of lif'e, rather than devoting his intelli­ gence to present being. We have already noted Faustus• concern about hie ability to 0 leuell" at the end, which is an ironical foreshadowing of the p~'e conclusion. Marlowe has entertai.ned with clowns and even allowed his Doctor . Faustus to act the part of a clown to show his psychological descent 4V

to the ridiculous. When ve might have become critical ot the ad­ mirable-become depraved Faustus; we have been disarmed of criticism b.r the "nuances of Marlowe's own attitude toward this Faustian

egotism and the nothingness at the heart of it," and we have been moved, instead, to "gentle laughter.11112 . Ornstein, recalling the

absurdities used by ironists, remi.nds 'U8 that we smile because "we know that no man, however foolish, would "damn his soul to satisfy

bis belly-to gain infinite power, yea, but we consider such aspira­ tion heroic.nll3 Ornstei n shows the r i diculousness ot both desires and points to the ironic fate. of .Faustus who "dreamed or commanding . · 114 the powers" of the universe but who could not evade death. With magnificent insi ght into mankind's psychologic(il struggle with the presumably discrete entities of "good" and "evil," Marlowe contrasts the stoical Faustus who resolutely pursues bis anodyne-­ enjoying bel~ cheer during his final houre--with a frenetic, coward­

ly Faustus crying wildly when bis existential dilemma ~an no longer . ' . be ignored. ·. The fifth act begins nob~ enough I all substance has

been willed to Wagner, a party in bis home finds Faustus U8ing his magic to entertain hie friends, while the devils hustle and bustle back and forth as they carry covered dishes to the study and shoot

oft their fire-crackers. The merriment CafteS to an abrupt halt when Faustus reveals bis plight to the Scbolarst a contract that nseds tultillment. His nemesis has trom the Prologue been an absolute. Heither faith nor repentance can now help Faust\18. The entire play

·eeflllS to be ironical at this point, for Faustus with bis magic skill still can not overcome death. All that Faustus bad earlier accom­ plished as a scholar--the honors, the "monuments"--and all that he managed to encompass in his life as a magician have finally come to naught. He craves to be turned into a rain drop. Even such llmi ted reincarnation would be satisfactory, but his magic excludes actualiza­ tion or the Pythagorean theory of metempsychosis. Faustus is power­ less before and because of his final "end." (The damned were at least damned forever.) Unsucceesful in his earlier attempt to bid his non-being farewell, he will attain surcease only as soon as Marlowe pens the final line. Twice, Faustus calls himself a wretch and bas bis thoughts drawn away from suicide by the Old Man's inter­ cession. Fearful, yet, of death, Faustus cries:

I do repent, and yet I doe despaire, Hell striues with grace !or conquest in my breast: What shall I doe to shun the snares o! death? (V.i.B-1831-1833)

Still a humorous character, still vaci.llating, Faustus is here plagued by his lack or intellectual integrity. A person of inde­ cision all of his life, he exemplifies a eh:f.ldieh nat~e even yet. The cowardly shriek, "What shall I do ••• ?" substantiates Marlowe's thesis of the absurd Faustus whose mind is in chaos. His mind tor­ ments him even in his egoti sti cal final hour when he knows that 11 aF£uotus [sic] o!fence can nere be pardoned" (V.ii.B-1937). > But bis fear, or that unknown quality called death, remains. Soon he will come to his "end." And then it happens! The clock strikes, 42

the drums beat out the sound or thunder, and the devils swarm onto the stage firing their squibs and dancing about; finally, dancing around and picking up Faustus bodily, they leave with him riding on one of their backs, as the Vice was wont to do. Noise from fireworks and thunderous drums reverberates in combination with phenomenal spectacle which, in itself, rises to a crescendo when Faustus' limbs are strewn all over the stage as a reminder of his devilish fall. The flnale for the audience is to see, again, those same limbs or Faustus which had often been stretm across the stage in one hilar­ ious scene after another. Once more gracing the boards, these ;limbs . of Faustus call forth the Scholar's words: "• •• see here -are Faustus

[~icJ limbs, / All tome asunder by the hand of death" (V .iii .B-2099- 2100) and give the audience another occasion for "gentle laughter." The audience bas been as conditioned to laugh when presented with Faustus' dismemberment of limbs as Pavlov's dog to salivate. This ending, with the strewn limbs scattered everywhere, tlrus leaves the audience with more ridicule and contempt than sympatey for the absurd Faustus. It is possible now to see the dismemberment motif throughout the play as Marlowe's metaphorfcal manipulation of the comic events he found in his source, the Faustbook. The situation of Faustus becomes symbolic. The humorous staged decapitation of the hero tells us that the hero has lost his intellectual capacity to reason well through giving himsel.f to lucifer, to black magic, and the limbs strewn about the stage in the alternate ending illustrate a metaphysical idea that 43

the devils did not keep him in 11 hell11 where his body would feel the

· torture of fire and brimstone, that Faustus has already felt the torments of hell, and that the fate of mankind is finally nothingness following his danse macabre.

Taking an overview of Marlowe's play, we realize there is con­ siderable historical and artistic and philosophical justification for inclusion of so much humorous matter. We can now emnnerate various

reasons for its presence in a play often asswned to be tragic. First, the humor works here much as Spivak saw it working in the old ~mple morality. Specificall,y, it provides an anodyne reassuring the Chris• tian audience that evil, subject after all to an omnipotent God's

will, will finally be defeated. The audience accepts t he stern sennon that the wages of sin is death, but the p~ seemingly prepares for a more hopeful outcome than we get. The rollicking rhythms of the clowns

in the first part and the low hmnor with matching antics of Faustus himself in the second part successfully lull the consciousness of the audience-up to a point. Hence, it comes as a shock that Faustus is actually damned in an ending unlike that of the simple morality, but the on1,y possil-le conclusion in Marlowe's sixteenth century world. Second, the humor works to evoke a figure representative of hybrid

mankind, a compound of seriousness and foollslmess like the Vice in the hybrid morality. Incorporating both serious and cam.cal characteristics,

Faustus portrays what is generally conceived to be two separable aspects ot mankind's nature~ embracing the "evil" which custom dictates should

be partially masked or disguised. Faustus displays all the attributes or the Vice character--aorrow/mirth, passivity/activ1.ty, elevated humanity/low humanity. As Vice, however, he is only a metaphorical figure, a personification of an abstraction, hence an amoral non-being, capable of performing exaggerated absurdities to please his audience. To the extent that we recognize his status as a disembodied artistic creation, which can not exist beyond the limitations ascribed to him by the artist, we can laugh at this scholar-become-tool without worry­ ing about his potential damnation. Third, the more particular~ absurd humor involving the central character, taking on the quality of nightmare or hysteria, conveys

Faustus• psychological status after his "fall, n name~ the hell of an unquiet mind. Thus it shows Faustus experi encing--during his life­ time--the truth of Mephostophilis' statement, "Why this is hell: nor .. am I out of it" (I.iii.B-301) •. From· the moment of sealing bis involve- ment w.i th black magic, when Faustus himself pronounced his doom (".£2!:!­ sununatum m"), he has sought extr:i.nsie pleasure and satisfaction and thua ever increased his hellish torture. Later, Faustus rune the gamut trom foolish mischievousness (e.g., snatching the Pope's wine) to plain viciousness (e.g., the Benvolio episode). Throughout, his intellect appears to have perverted itself in the cause of diversion; but the intellectual activity, however debased as prankishness, provides an anodyne for his own pain and .fear. It appears that .Faustus may have departed from his search for "infinite riches• because of his fear. This caused him to act impulsive~, to reason later, and to conclude his life as a coward, dismembered psychologically and literally. When­ ever Mephostophilis threatens Faustus with dismemberment, Faustus grovels in fear and acquiesces, in spite of his former advice to Mephos- tophilio "Learne thou of Faustus manly fortitude" (I.iii.B-310).

The insidious corruption of Faustus' mind creates his downfall; his

clownishness is a significant aftermath of self-deception. His frenetic pursuit of the anodyne culmi nates in his fi.nal absurd pos­ ture as a clown. His bravura plunge into black magic thus leads

him to a hell be could not envision when he spoke of hell as a fable. Hence Faustus faces an existential dilemma: the search for satisfaction involves him in a hell of his own creation, and the attempt to escape from this hell provokes him to further antics,

which in turn heighten his sense of· being· in hell. Perhaps thr~ugh

this defeat Marlowe offers a philosophical view of the absurdity of mankind's aspirations, whether for "belly cheer" or infinite power

and knowledge. lJ. A. Symonds, Shakespeare I s Predecessors in the English Drama · (Hew York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1906), p. ~.-

2 Ibid., pp. 505-519. 3u. M. Ellis-Fermor, Christopher Marlowe (Hamden, Connecticut, Archon. Books, 196 7), p. 82. 4John Bakeless, Christopher Marlowe: . The Man in His Time (New Iorkt . William Morrow and Company., 1937), p.138. - - - Sibid.

· · 6Id8Jll, The Tragical Histoi) o~ Christopher Marlowe, vol.1 (Cambridge: Harvar~ University Press, 1942 , p. 302.

7Paul Kocher, ed., "Introduction," The Tragical History of ·Doctor Faustus (Nev York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1950), p.xiii. 8 . Ibid., PP• vi-xiii. 9 ~ Levin, The Overreacher 1 ! Stu? ot Christopher Marlowe (Caml;>ri.dge: Harvard University Press, 19 2), p. 124. 1 0w11bur Sanders, Th! Dramatist~ the Received Idea: Studies in !b! P~q; ot Marlowe~ Shakespeare-ZCambridge: The University ~ess, 1 8, p. 212.

11ttobert Ornstein, "The Comic Synthesis in Doctor Faustus,• Marlowei Doctor Faustus: A Casebook, ed. Jo}m Jump (Nashville: lurora Publishers Incorporated, 1970}, p. 167. 12 13 Ibid., pp. 167-170. . Ibid., p. 170.

14Bernard Spivak, Shakespeare and the Allegor.'f of Evil: The History ot & Metaphor ~n Relation to His /Iajor Villa1.ns New York: Columbia 'ffniversity Press, 1958), PP• 28- 9. · lS . Ibid., pp. 131-151.

16J. B. Steane, Marlowe: A Critical study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964), p. lb4. l7David Bevington, From Mankind~ Marlowe: Growth!}! Structure in the P~lar Drmna o'Trudor England (Cambridge i Harvard University Tress"; 1 2), P• 252 .- . 18 19 Ibid., p. 162. Ibid., P• 247. 21Ibid,- · 22Ibid., p. 2S.3. 23 Ibid., p. 2;N•~ 47

24M1chael Goldman, "Marlowe and the Histrionics of Ravishment," Two Renaissance Mythmaker~: Chr1.stopher Marlowe ~nd Ben Johnson: Selected Pa~rs from the Bnelish I nstltute 2 1975-76, ed. Alvin Kernan {Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977), pp. 37-38.

25spi.vak, p. 120.

27Gol.dnran, p. -39. 28 Stephen J. Greenblatt, "Marlowe and Renaissance Sell-Fashioning," !!!.2 Renaissance Mythmakers: Chr1_stopher Marlowe l'..nd Ben Johnsont Selected Papers from the English Institute. 1975-%, ed. Alvin Kernan (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977), p. 4.3. '

29Ibid., · p. 57 • .30rbid., p. 58. .32E. A. Snow, "Marlowe's Doctor Faustus and the Ends of Desire,° Two Renaissance Mn,maker s : Chrlstonher Marlowe and Ben Jolmson: 'Selected Papers~ the English Institute, 1975-Tu, ed. Alvin Kernan (Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977), PP• 75-94. ).3Ibid., p. 94 • J4Ibid., pp. 96-101.

.35w. L. Godsbalk, The Marlovian World Picture (The Hague: Mouton & Company, 1974), p. 37 •

.36Ibid., pp. 169-171. .37Ibid., p. 200 •

.38Gree~blatt, P• S7 •

.39w11l.iam Rose, ed., The History of the Damnable Lire and Deserved of Doctor John Faustus ~ Together-with ~he Second~ort_2! ~ austus: Containing His Appearances and the Deeds of Kagner ~(Nev York: E. P. Dutton& Company, n.d-:T, ~26. -

40ibid., pp. 65-208.

4~. P. Wi18on, Marlowe ~ ~ Early Shakespeare: The Clark lectures (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1953}, pp. 69-70.

42Ibid., p. 118. 4.3 Ibid., P• l\.O.IV. 4hr bid., P• 2~.3.r!

4.5-~ivak, P• 12). 46Ibid., P• 60.

47Bevington, P• 12;. 48aobert Boies Sharpe, Iro}t1 in the Drama: An Essa~ .2!! Imoersonatl on, Shock, and Catharsis (Chapel 111: The University of orth Carolina Press, 19$9 J, p. 86. 49Ibid. 51· soSpivak, P• 121. Ibid., p. 130. 52 Ibid., p. 132.

53phyllis Hartnoll~ Concise History of the Theatre (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1968;, pp. 4.5-46. - - 54Ibid.

55A. M. Nagler, A Source Book in Theatrical Histo~: (Sou:i·ces o! Theatrical History)-(l1ew Yoric:Dover Publications, nc., 1952), pp. 46-47. 56E. K. Chambers, The Elizabethan Stage, vol. 3 (London: Oxford _University Press, 192"3f,' p. 412. . .

57L. W. Cushman, The Devil and the Vice in the Engli~h Dral'l\atic ~terature Before Shakespeare {New Yor~The ~anities Press, 1970), p. 145. 5~. K. Chambers,~ Mediaeval Stage, vol. 2 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903), P• 204 • .

59susanne K. Langer, "The Great Dramatic Fonns: The Comic Rhythm," ~: P~s, Theory, and Criticism, ed. Marvin Felheim (New York: ~ourt, ace, & World-;-lnc., 1962), p. 249.

6n..~pivak, p. 135. 61Ibid., p. l42. 62Ibid. 63Ibid., . p. 19.8 64 · 6$ 66 Ibid., P• 142. Ibid., p. 201. Ibid., 198. 6 68 7Ibid., p. 227. Ibid., p. 148. 69Ibid. 70 Bevington, p. 253. 71spivak, p. 279.

72Bevington, p. 1,6. 73Ibid., p. 162. 74Ibid~, p. 161.

75Ibid., PP• 1$2-169.

76Spivak, p. 59. 77Ibid., p. 95. 78 Bevington, p. 162.

79~el Bradbrook, Themes~ Conventions of Elizabethan Trae-edy (Cambridge: The University Press, 1966), p. 19. 49

80Cushman, p. 40. 8 . 81Bradbrook, p. 18. 2Ibid., p. 1,. 83Nagler, pp. 46-47.

84Bradbrook, P• 18. 85Nagler, p. 47. 86spivak, p. 35. 87Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus: 1604-1616: Parallel Texts, ed. w. w. Greg (London: Oxford University Press, 1950), P• 163. Quarto B-1616 will be the standard text used for references in this paper unless otherwise indicated. It appears to be the general con­ senses of Marlovian scholars that Quaxto B-1616 most nearly represents what might have been Marlowe's original city performance of Doctor Faustus. Quarto A, the shorter text, seems probably to have been the ·text used by the itinerary troupes in the more provincial areas. 88Gilbert Highet, The Anatomy of Satire (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1962), p. 183. B9Ibid. 50ool~an, P• 34. 91Ibid., PP• 34-37. 92Chambers, p. 203. 93Spivak, p. 178. 946rnstein, p. 167.

95aor1e, p. 26. 96rr Timothy 3:7. 97Ellls-Fcn nor, p. 70. 98Ibid., p. 64. 99Bradbrook, P• 19. 100David Finkelstein, "Logos/Mythos," The Kenyon Review, 1, NS (Winter, 1979) :94• . lOl-- -Xenneth Burke, "Logology and Theology," The Kenyon Review, 1, NS (Winter, 1979):174. 102Snow, P• 101. 103Ibid., PP• 101-102. 104Ibid., P• 79.

1050rnstein, p. 170. 106 David Hard Zucker, Stage and Image in ~ Pla~s 2.f. Christopher Marlowe (Salzburg, Austria: Universitat--Salzburg ress, 1968), p. 1.47.

1070rnstein, p. 16B • 108s now, pp. n£7V-97. lO~Orn stein, p. 168 • 110:rbtd., p. 170. 111Ibid. 112Snow, p. 96. llJOrnstein, P• 167. ll4Ibid., P• 170. 11sLeo Kirschbaum, "Marlowe's Faustus: A Reconsideration," Christopher Marlowe's Doctor Faustusi Text and Ma~ CriticisM, ed. Irving Ribner

Bakeless, John. Christopher Marlowe: The Man in His Time. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1937.

----· The Tragical History of Christopher Marlowe. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1942.

Bevington, David M. From Mankind !2 Marlowe: Growth of Structure in the Popular Drama of Tudor England. Cambridge: Harvard "trniversity Press, 1962.

Bradbrook, Muriel c. Themes and Conventions of Elizabethan Tragedy. Cambridge: The University Press, 1966. ·

Burke, Kenneth. "Logology and Theology.11 Kenyon Review 1 (Winter 1979): 151-185.

Chambers, Edmund K. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 vols. London: Ox.ford University Press, 1923.

----· The Mediaeval Stage. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903. Cushman, L. W. The Devil and~ Vice i!! the English Dramatic Literature Before Sha.kespeare. New York: The Humanities Press, 1970.

Ellis.:F'ermor, U. M. Christopher Marlowe. · Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books, 1967.

Finkelstein, David. "Logos/Mythos." Kenyc~ Review.l (Winter 1979): 136-150.

· Godshalk, w. L. The Marlovian World Picture. The Hague: Mouton & Company, 1974.

Goldman, Michael. "Marlowe and the Histr:J.onics of Ravishment." !lig Renaissance Mythmakers: Christopher Marlowe and Ben Johnson: Selected Papers .f1:.2m the English Institute, 1972-76. ed. Alvin kernan. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977, pp. 22-40.

Greenblatt, Stephen J. "Marlowe and Renaissance Self.:F'ashioning." .'!'.!2 Renaissance Mythmakers: Christopher Marlowe and Ben Jchnson: Selected Papers from the English Institute, 1975-'7'6: ed. Alvin Xernan. Baltimore anDondon: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977, pp. 41-69. 5l.

Bartnoll, Phyllis. Concise Histo~ of the Theatre. New York: Charles Scribner•e Sons, 196 .- - Highet. Gilbert. The AnatTr or Satire. Princeton, New Jerseyi ~rinceton University ress, 1962. Kocher, Paul, ed. "Introduction." The Tra[i.cal History 2.£ Doctor Faustus. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1950.

Kirschbaum, Leo. "Marlowe's Faustus: A Reconsideration." Chris­ topher Marlowe I e Doctor Faustus: Text and ~a.jor Crit i d sm. ed. Irving Ribner. New Yorks The~ssey ress, Inc., 1966. Langer, Susanne K. "The Great Dramatic Forms s The Comic Rhytrnn." ~i Plfu, Theorr, ~ Critici$m. ed. Marvin Felheim. "Rev""York: court, Brace, & World, Inc., 1962.

Levin, Harry. The Overreacher: l Study of Christopher Marlowe. Boston: Beacon Press, 1952 • .

Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus: ~-1616. Parallel. Texts. w. w. Greg. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950. Nagler, A. M. ! Source Book in Theatrical Hi story (Sources of Theatr1cal Historz;;--l'few York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1952. Ornstein, Robert. "The Comic Synthesis in Doctor Faustus." Mar­ .!2!!= Doctor Faustus.! Casebook. ed. John Jump. Nashville: Aurora Publishers Incorporated, 1970. · Rose, William, ed. The His~ .2! the Damnable Life .!!".:.:.; Deserved Death ,g£ Doctor John Faustus lig Together ~ ·~i-, A Second Report .2! Faustus: Containj ng His Appearances .!!?.£! ~ Deeds Et. Wagner 1$.2!i. New Yorks E. P.Dutton & Company, n.d. Sanders, Wilbur. The Dramat:i.st and the Received I dea: Studies in !!?£ Playp otMarlowe and Shakespeare. Cambridge: The un1::- . versity ress, 1968. .

Sharpe1 Robert Boies. Irony in~ Drama: !!! ~seay 2.n Imoersonation, ::>hock, and Catharsi s. Chapel H111: The niversity of North Caroliria'"Press, 1959.

Snow, E. A. "Marlowe's Doctor Faustus and the Ende of Desire." Two Renaissance Mythmakers: Chr:i stopher Marlowe ~ Ben Johnson: Selected Paners f!:2!!! the English I nst i tute, 1975-"1Z': ed. Alvin Kernan. Baltimore and London: The Johna Hopkins University Press, 1977, pp. 70-110. 52

· Spivak, Bernard. Shakespeare .!!!9 the Alleeory of Evi 1: The History or.! Metaphor 1,E Relatlon j& H:i.s Ma.jor Villa:t.ns. New York: ColUJllbla University Press, 19.58.

Steane, J. B. Marlowe: ! Critlcal Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.

Symonds, J. A. Shakespeare's Predecessors in the English Drama. New York: Charles Scribner1s S~ns, 19C6.

Wilson, F. P. Marlowe and the Early Shakespeare: The Clark lectures. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1953.

Zucker, David Hard. Stage and Image 1!! the Plays Et, Christopher Marlowe. Salzburg, Austria: Universita.t Salzburg Press, 1968.