DOCSLIB.ORG

The Issues That Will Decide 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Issues That Will Decide 2020 October 2019 A Magazine from FreedomWorks FREEDOM WORKING Impeachment?Impeachment? THE ISSUES THAT WILL DECIDE 2020 (PG 4) WHAT LIBERALS HAVE PLANNED FOR US ALL (PG 14) SAVING AMERICANS FROM SOCIALIST SNAKE OIL (PG 19) Contents 12 4 President’s Overview: The Issues for 2020 Adam Brandon, President 6 The Sound Money Caucus? David Voegtle, Program Coordinator 8 Big Win Secured Noah Wall, Vice President of Advocacy 12 Member of Congress Spotlight: Congressman Thomas Massie Jason Pye, Vice President of Legislative Affairs 14 Federal Update: What Liberals Have Planned For Us All Jason Pye, Vice President of Legislative Affairs 16 Today’s ‘Flat Earthers’ John Tamny, Vice President 18 Digital Day of Action 19 Saving Americans From Socialist Snake Oil Emily Stack, Director of Grassroots 16 6 14 30 20 Grassroots Spotlight: Miriam Chu Emily Stack, Director of Grassroots 22 One of Ours: Time for District Statehood and Representation? Adam Brandon, President 23 Worth Repeating: Importing Drug Prices Stephen Moore, Senior Economic Contributor 24 Put “The Swamp” on Notice Daniel Savickas, Regulatory Policy Manager 26 An Interview with Jim Lamon Phil Bell, Director of External Affairs 28 Fall Book Preview Adam’s Book Club 29 Partner Profile: Young Americans for Liberty Colby Bledsoe, Director of Campaigns 30 Activist Event Highlight: FreedomWorks Activists’ August Blitz Emily Stack, Director of Grassroots 29 PRESIDENT’S OVERVIEW: THE ISSUES FOR 2020 By Adam Brandon If we’re honest with ourselves, we all knew this moment would come – the moment when the Washington, D.C. “Swamp” would boil over with the fever of impeaching this President. After all, Donald Trump committed the ultimate political crime by defeating the Washington, D.C. “Swamp’s” chosen candidate, Hillary Clinton, in 2016. From then on, it seemed like a matter of “when” – not “if.” The first excuse was when the President fired FBI Director James Comey – who was memorably described as “Leaker of the Free World” by the New York Post Then, it was the Mueller Report that was supposed to doom this President. But that turned out to be nothing but a dud. Now that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) are pressing forward once again with impeachment, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) is saying, “Impeachment is not good enough for Trump. He needs to be imprisoned & placed in solitary confinement.” 4 FREEDOMWORKING It’s not just President Trump that’s drawing the ire of conservative voices – was caught worrying aloud that today’s radical Left. Senator Elizabeth Warren would win the White House! The one-year anniversary of Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s On every issue – from the economy, to socialism versus confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court brought renewed free markets, to taxes, to the federal courts, to the Deep pressure by the Left to impeach him as well – buoyed by State, to immigration, to protecting the First Amendment – yet another laughable smear job by reporters for The New conservatives have reason to be optimistic. York Times. But it’s not going to happen without a fight – not with the Not long before, several Democrat Senators – including dirty tricks the opponents of freedom are now resorting to. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), The good news is, your support for FreedomWorks is Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Richard Durbin (D-IL), and Kirsten helping us lay the groundwork for a successful 2020. Gillibrand (D-NY) – sent a stunning threat to the U.S. In fact, in the following pages of this magazine, you’ll see Supreme Court. how your contributions are making a difference – whether With a new conservative majority, these Senators stated, that’s battling socialist price controls on prescription drugs, “The Supreme Court is not well. And people know it.” implementing our “Dirty Thirty” Campaign Plan to help take Then they proceeded to demand the court “heal” (i.e. back the House in 2020, our work educating the American follow left-wing marching orders) or “face restructuring.” people on free market economics through the Center for So what does all of this mean? Economic Freedom, or the Regulatory Action Center’s efforts It means that (if it wasn’t already near the top of the list) to unwind the Regulatory State. left-wing insanity just became one of the very biggest issues This magazine is reserved for investors as a way to on the docket as we head into 2020. say “thank you” for supporting us and show you how your For these radicals, impeaching the President and packing generosity is making an impact. the U.S. Supreme Court is just a “start.” I hope you like what you see. From there, they’ll ram through Alexandria Ocasio- With the impeachment battle raging and 2020 right Cortez’s “Green New Deal,” destroy American healthcare with around the corner, we’re counting on your support more than “Medicare for All,” and open our borders to ensure illegal ever. I know you understand the stakes. immigrants get the final say on who enters our country (not law-abiding Americans). And then they’ll ram through a massive anti-free speech Adam Brandon, President bill like H.R. 1 to ensure you and I can’t say a peep about it. Even Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg – who, along with other social media behemoths has worked to silence OCTOBER 2019 5 Re Photo: John Tamny (right) is pictured with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC). THE SOUND MONEY CAUCUS? THE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC FREEDOM HEADS TO CAPITOL HILL By David Voegtle When John Tamny joined FreedomWorks to serve as the toward this pressing issue for the American people, educating Director of the Center for Economic Freedom, he brought with lawmakers one by one to spread the gospel of sound money him a unique vision to reinvigorate discourse in Washington, D.C. when and where no one else is. about the importance of a sound, stable dollar. From there, CEF and FreedomWorks are working with these As Tamny saw it, the conversation about the wisdom of members to build a coalition in Congress dedicated to defining a sound, well-defined currency had faded to a whisper, the and thus stabilizing the dollar. champions of the cause all but gone silent. In the silence, a quiet From the beginning of this project, it was clear that John crisis had crept into the U.S. financial system – the dollar’s value, Tamny and CEF would have their work cut out for them. There once so reliable, was in a state of flux, largely due to its status as were no other groups making a significant effort to raise a “floating” currency. awareness on sound money issues in Congress. So Tamny and As Tamny understood, an unstable dollar discourages CEF would be going into Congress alone. investments by disrupting the real value of stock market Making the journey to Capitol Hill alone might have discouraged shares as the dollar’s value waxed and waned. The threat to the some people, but it only steeled Tamny’s resolve. Immediately, CEF American economy is real, yet hardly anyone talks about it. set to work developing a plan of action starting with research. Today, John Tamny and the Center for Economic Freedom Through an extensive study of committee assignments, (CEF) are taking the helm and steering the discussion back bill sponsorships, and press releases, CEF developed a list 6 FREEDOMWORKING Re of representatives and senators who might be receptive to a With the help of CEF, members of Congress looking to conversation about bringing stability back to the dollar. CEF address this issue would now have a partner willing to help make reached out to these offices to discuss sound money. this issue more of a priority. CEF, true to its goal of bringing As the CEF team began correspondence with offices on its free market principles to legislators in a bold new way, is Capitol Hill, it became apparent that there was a keen – if breaking new ground – and it’s only just getting started. untapped - interest in Congress about strengthening the dollar. By the end of July, CEF had held twenty-three meetings with In no time at all, John Tamny was scheduled for his first round of congressional offices, with eight more planned to take place meetings with more to follow soon after. after Congress’ summer recess. The meetings had demonstrated As Tamny entered the first round of meetings, it wasn’t clear plainly what John Tamny had suspected all along: that the idea of what CEF should expect. strengthening the dollar by tying it to something concrete could Would the offices be receptive to the case Tamny intended be brought back into the national conversation. to make for sound money, or would they reject it? Far from being a non-starter, many offices were eager to The answer became apparent almost immediately. As move forward and make sound money a part of their legislative the meetings continued, feedback from the offices was agenda. Some, like the office of Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV), had consistent: that Tamny was one of the only, if not the only, even proposed bills of their own advocating a return to the gold visitor they ever had specifically discussing the topic of standard in Congress prior to meeting with Tamny. sound money. As Tamny visited office after office, another But before CEF’s meetings on Capitol Hill, these offices had consistency became evident: that this was an idea that could been working mostly independently of one another, assuming there gain traction on Capitol Hill. was no existing coalition to turn to on matters of sound money.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who They Are and How American News Media Gets It Wrong
    Jeremy Abrams The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who they are and How American News Media Gets it Wrong Jeremy Abrams 1 Table of Content I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Defining Political Parties and their Role in Democracies ................................................................. 2 A. Generally ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Structurally .................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. How the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood Fit the Mold ................................................. 4 III. Brief Descriptions of the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood ............................................. 4 A. The Tea Party ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. History ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The System in Which it Operates ..................................................................................................... 9 3. Official Status ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • MAP Act Coalition Letter Freedomworks
    April 13, 2021 Dear Members of Congress, We, the undersigned organizations representing millions of Americans nationwide highly concerned by our country’s unsustainable fiscal trajectory, write in support of the Maximizing America’s Prosperity (MAP) Act, to be introduced by Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.). As we stare down a mounting national debt of over $28 trillion, the MAP Act presents a long-term solution to our ever-worsening spending patterns by implementing a Swiss-style debt brake that would prevent large budget deficits and increased national debt. Since the introduction of the MAP Act in the 116th Congress, our national debt has increased by more than 25 percent, totaling six trillion dollars higher than the $22 trillion we faced less than two years ago in July of 2019. Similarly, nearly 25 percent of all U.S. debt accumulated since the inception of our country has come since the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Now more than ever, it is critical that legislators take a serious look at the fiscal situation we find ourselves in, with a budget deficit for Fiscal Year 2020 of $3.132 trillion and a projected share of the national debt held by the public of 102.3 percent of GDP. While markets continue to finance our debt in the current moment, the simple and unavoidable fact remains that our country is not immune from the basic economics of massive debt, that history tells us leads to inevitable crisis. Increased levels of debt even before a resulting crisis slows economic activity -- a phenomenon referred to as “debt drag” -- which especially as we seek recovery from COVID-19 lockdowns, our nation cannot afford.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • After All the Hydra Heads of Trumpcare Had Been Chopped Off in One Roll
    After all the hydra heads of Trumpcare had been chopped off in one roll call after another, the Affordable Care Act and the healthcare system still lay in peril this week, subject to the whims of a vindictive president. But humiliating as it was for Republicans and scary for the 400,000 Arkansans and 20 millions other Americans who had gotten health insurance, the ugly congressional battle did one wholesome thing. It stripped away the political pretenses that all sides had conjured up for either defending or killing the 2010 health-insurance law that Republicans dubbed "Obamacare." It left standing the real issue from the health-care debate's beginning in 2009 until today: whether people have a right to medical care. If they do, then the government is obliged to find a way to provide it for everyone. That is what the Affordable Care Act, with all its interlocking and often confusing parts, was designed to do and what all the amendments and "replacement" bills set out to undo. They stripped away one or all the Affordable Care Act's mechanisms for helping people with incomes under 400 percent of the poverty line pay for coverage and to make it more affordable for those above the line. Every bill sank when the Congressional Budget Office and other analysts supplied the numbers: the millions who would lose access to healthcare. Although polls have long shown that most Americans think everyone should be insured, it is not a one-sided theoretical debate. Libertarians like Sen. Rand Paul and the so-called Freedom Caucus are frank about it: The government has no business subsidizing anyone's medical care.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontrunners Win in New York, Harriet Tubman to Go on the $20, and Could Facebook Tilt the Election?: US National Blog Roundup for 16 – 22 April
    blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/04/22/frontrunners-win-in-new-york-harriet-tubman-to-go-on-the-20-and-could-facebook-tilt-the- election-us-national-blog-roundup-for-16-22-april/ Frontrunners win in New York, Harriet Tubman to go on the $20, and could Facebook tilt the election?: US national blog roundup for 16 – 22 April USAPP Managing Editor, Chris Gilson looks at the best in political blogging from around the Beltway. Jump to The 2016 campaign and the New York Primary The Democratic Campaign and the Candidates The Republican Campaign and the Candidates The Beltway and the Supreme Court Foreign policy, defense and trade Obamacare and health policy The economy and society The 2016 Campaign and the New York Primary On Saturday, American Thinker looks at the election dynamics between the Democratic and Republican frontrunners, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and New York billionaire Donald Trump. They comment that while Clinton has a fairly firm floor (and fixed ceiling) of support, Trump has a fluid floor and ceiling, leading to a great deal of uncertainty as how he might perform as the GOP’s presidential nominee. FiveThirtyEight writes this week that, despite what some might think, Donald Trump does not have the monopoly on intolerant supporters; Clinton and Sanders’ supporters can be just as intolerant as well. Still on the subject of who might vote for whom, The Daily Signal says that only 2 million voters in seven battleground counties will actually decide who the next president will be.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Goveners Association America 2024 Namun 2019
    REPUBLICAN GOVENERS ASSOCIATION AMERICA 2024 NAMUN 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Letter from the Chair 4 Letter from the Director 5 Introduction 6 Definitions 6 Historical Background I: Federalism 7 Federalism in the United States 7 Federalism in the Constitution 7 Federalism in Reality 8 Federalism in Jurisprudence 8 Federalism and Presidentialism 9 Federalism and the Congress 10 Moving Forward: A New Federalist Framework? 12 Historical Context II: Contemporary American Politics 12 Donald Trump 12 2016 Election 13 Russian Interference in the 2016 Election and Wiki Leaks 13 2018 Congressional Elections 13 2020 Presidential Election 14 2022 Congressional Elections 14 2024 Presidential Election 14 Timeline 15 Issues 16 Overview 16 Republicans 16 Democrats 16 Economy 17 Healthcare 17 Repealing and Replacing Obamacare 18 Immigration 19 Race 19 Task of the Committee 20 2 www.namun.org / [email protected] / @namun2019 The State of Affairs 20 Call to Action 20 Questions to Consider 20 Sources 21 Appendices 23 Appendix A: 2016 Electoral Map 23 Appendix B: 2024 Electoral Map 23 Appendix C: “The Blue Wall.” 23 Appendix D: Total U.S National Debt 24 Appendix E: Intragovernmental Debt 24 Appendix F: Public Debt 25 Appendix G. Ideology Changes in the Parties 26 Bibliography 27 3 www.namun.org / [email protected] / @namun2019 Letter from the Chair Dear Delegates, It is with great pleasure that I welcome you the Republican Governors of America 2024. I’d like to thank you for expressing your interest in this committee. My name is Michael Elliott and I will be the chair for this committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War in the American Ruling Class
    tripleC 16(2): 857-881, 2018 http://www.triple-c.at The Civil War in the American Ruling Class Scott Timcke Department of Literary, Cultural and Communication Studies, The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago, [email protected] Abstract: American politics is at a decisive historical conjuncture, one that resembles Gramsci’s description of a Caesarian response to an organic crisis. The courts, as a lagging indicator, reveal this longstanding catastrophic equilibrium. Following an examination of class struggle ‘from above’, in this paper I trace how digital media instruments are used by different factions within the capitalist ruling class to capture and maintain the commanding heights of the American social structure. Using this hegemony, I argue that one can see the prospect of American Caesarism being institutionally entrenched via judicial appointments at the Supreme Court of the United States and other circuit courts. Keywords: Gramsci, Caesarism, ruling class, United States, hegemony Acknowledgement: Thanks are due to Rick Gruneau, Mariana Jarkova, Dylan Kerrigan, and Mark Smith for comments on an earlier draft. Thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers – the work has greatly improved because of their contributions. A version of this article was presented at the Local Entanglements of Global Inequalities conference, held at The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine in April 2018. 1. Introduction American politics is at a decisive historical juncture. Stalwarts in both the Democratic and the Republican Parties foresee the end of both parties. “I’m worried that I will be the last Republican president”, George W. Bush said as he recoiled at the actions of the Trump Administration (quoted in Baker 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Tiered Balancing and the Fate of Roe V. Wade: How the New Supreme Court Majority Could Turn the Undue-Burden Standard Into a Deferential Pike Test
    TIERED BALANCING AND THE FATE OF ROE V. WADE: HOW THE NEW SUPREME COURT MAJORITY COULD TURN THE UNDUE-BURDEN STANDARD INTO A DEFERENTIAL PIKE TEST By Brendan T. Beery* In one of the more noteworthy uses of his much-ballyhooed “swing vote”1 on the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Anthony Kennedy sided with Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan in striking down two Texas laws that restricted access to reproductive- healthcare facilities. The laws did so by imposing toilsome admitting privileges and surgical-facility standards that clinics had difficulty abiding. 2 The proposition that a woman has an unenumerated constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy, at least before the point of fetal viability, won the day in 1973.3 But, as 2018 fades into 2019, no judicial precedent is more endangered than the one that has evolved in a triumvirate of cases: Roe v. Wade,4 Planned Parenthood v. Casey,5 and Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt,6 save perhaps the principle * Professor of Law, Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School; B.A., Bradley University, 1995; J.D., summa cum laude, Thomas M. Cooley Law School, 1998. The author wishes to thank his friend and colleague, Professor Daniel R. Ray, for his assistance in conceptualizing this essay. The author also thanks the editors and staff of the Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy for their incisive feedback, professionalism, and hard work. 1 See Caitlin E. Borgmann, Abortion, the Undue Burden Standard, and the Evisceration of Women’s Privacy, 16 WM. & MARY J. WOMEN & L. 291, 292 (2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenp Eace.Org /Kochindustries
    greenpeace.org/kochindustries Greenpeace is an independent campaigning organization that acts to expose global environmental problems and achieve solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future. Published March 2010 by Greenpeace USA 702 H Street NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Tel/ 202.462.1177 Fax/ 202.462.4507 Printed on 100% PCW recycled paper book design by andrew fournier page 2 Table of Contents: Executive Summary pg. 6–8 Case Studies: How does Koch Industries Influence the Climate Debate? pg. 9–13 1. The Koch-funded “ClimateGate” Echo Chamber 2. Polar Bear Junk Science 3. The “Spanish Study” on Green Jobs 4. The “Danish Study” on Wind Power 5. Koch Organizations Instrumental in Dissemination of ACCF/NAM Claims What is Koch Industries? pg. 14–16 Company History and Background Record of Environmental Crimes and Violations The Koch Brothers pg. 17–18 Koch Climate Opposition Funding pg. 19–20 The Koch Web Sources of Data for Koch Foundation Grants The Foundations Claude R. Lambe Foundation Charles G. Koch Foundation David H. Koch Foundation Koch Foundations and Climate Denial pg. 21–28 Lobbying and Political Spending pg. 29–32 Federal Direct Lobbying Koch PAC Family and Individual Political Contributions Key Individuals in the Koch Web pg. 33 Sources pg. 34–43 Endnotes page 3 © illustration by Andrew Fournier/Greenpeace Mercatus Center Fraser Institute Americans for Prosperity Institute for Energy Research Institute for Humane Studies Frontiers of Freedom National Center for Policy Analysis Heritage Foundation American
    [Show full text]